XML 44 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Immaterial Restatement
6 Months Ended
Jul. 01, 2012
Composite Depreciation Retirment Method Immaterial Restatement [Abstract]  
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections [Text Block]
Immaterial Restatement:

The Partnership uses the composite depreciation method for the group of assets acquired as a whole in 1983, as well as for groups of assets in each subsequent business acquisition. Upon the normal retirement of an asset within a composite group, the Partnership's practice generally has been to extend the depreciable life of that composite group beyond its original estimated useful life. In conjunction with the preparation of the Partnership's financial statements for the three months ended July 1, 2012, management determined that this methodology was not appropriate. As a result, the Partnership has revised the useful lives of its composite groups to their original estimated useful life (ascribed upon acquisition) and corrected previously computed depreciation expense (and accumulated depreciation). Management has evaluated the amount and nature of these adjustments and concluded that they are not material to either the Partnership's prior annual or quarterly financial statements. Nonetheless, the historical financial statement amounts included in this filing have been corrected for this error. The Partnership expects to likewise correct previously presented historical financial statements to be included in future filings, including the annual financial statements to be included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2012.

The tables below detail the effects of such depreciation adjustments (including the related deferred income tax impact) on previously presented historical financial statement amounts:

Balance Sheet
 
 
 
 
12/31/2011
 
6/26/2011
Accumulated depreciation
 
 
 
As originally filed
$
(1,044,589
)
 
$
(992,971
)
Correction
(18,599
)
 
(17,421
)
As restated
$
(1,063,188
)
 
$
(1,010,392
)
Total assets
 
 
 
As originally filed
$
2,074,557

 
$
2,173,732

Correction
(18,599
)
 
(17,421
)
As restated
$
2,055,958

 
$
2,156,311

Deferred Tax Liability
 
 
 
As originally filed
$
135,446

 
$
129,499

Correction
(1,679
)
 
(1,296
)
As restated
$
133,767

 
$
128,203

Limited Partners' Equity
 
 
 
As originally filed
$
182,438

 
$
75,525

Correction
(16,920
)
 
(16,125
)
As restated
$
165,518

 
$
59,400








Statement of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
Twelve months ended
 
 
6/26/2011
 
6/26/2011
 
6/26/2011
Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
As originally filed
 
$
42,764

 
$
46,554

 
$
125,472

Correction
 
621

 
855

 
2,036

As restated
 
$
43,385

 
$
47,409

 
$
127,508

Income (loss) before tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
As originally filed
 
$
8,431

 
$
(95,860
)
 
$
(29,437
)
Correction
 
(621
)
 
(855
)
 
(2,036
)
As restated
 
$
7,810

 
$
(96,715
)
 
$
(31,473
)
Provision (benefit) for taxes
 
 
 
 
As originally filed
 
$
3,765

 
$
(15,834
)
 
$
38,008

Correction
 
(237
)
 
(237
)
 
(590
)
As restated
 
$
3,528

 
$
(16,071
)
 
$
37,418

Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 
As originally filed
 
$
4,666

 
$
(80,026
)
 
$
(67,445
)
Correction
 
(384
)
 
(618
)
 
(1,446
)
As restated
 
$
4,282

 
$
(80,644
)
 
$
(68,891
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per limited partner unit:
 
 
 
 
As originally filed
 
$
0.08

 
$
(1.45
)
 
$
(1.22
)
Correction
 

 
(0.01
)
 
(0.02
)
As restated
 
$
0.08

 
$
(1.46
)
 
$
(1.24
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
 
 
 
 
As originally filed
 
$
0.08

 
$
(1.45
)
 
$
(1.22
)
Correction
 

 
(0.01
)
 
(0.02
)
As restated
 
$
0.08

 
$
(1.46
)
 
$
(1.24
)

Had the 2011 annual financial statements been restated, net income (loss) would have decreased $1.4 million and the provision (benefit) for taxes would have decreased $0.6 million.  If the 2010 annual financial statements had been restated, net income (loss) would have decreased $1.5 million and the provision (benefit) for taxes would have decreased $0.6 million.  If the 2009 annual financial statements had been restated, net income (loss) would have decreased $1.2 million and the provision (benefit) for taxes would have decreased $0.4 million.  The balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 has already been corrected in this Form 10-Q.