XML 17 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
2.
     
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the sale of
the Company’s products and services are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred (or services have been rendered), the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company generally ships products F.O.B. shipping point. There is
no
conditional evaluation on any product sold and recognized as revenue. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue on the balance sheet.
 
There is
no
right of return provided for distributors
or customers. For sales of products made to distributors, the Company considers a number of factors in determining whether revenue is recognized upon transfer of title to the distributor, or when payment is received. These factors include, but are
not
limited to, whether the payment terms offered to the distributor are considered to be non-standard, the distributor history of adhering to the terms of its contractual arrangements with the Company, the level of inventories maintained by the distributor, whether the Company has a pattern of granting concessions for the benefit of the distributor, and whether there are other conditions that
may
indicate that the sale to the distributor is
not
substantive. The Company currently recognizes revenue primarily on the sell-in method with its distributors.
 
Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into units of accounting if certain criteria are met, including whether the deliverable item(s) has (have) value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Revenue for each unit of accounting is recognized as the unit of accounting is delivered. Arrangement consideration is allocated to each unit of accounting based upon the relative estimated selling prices of the separate units of accounting contained within an arrangement containing multiple deliverables. Estimated selling prices are determined using vendor specific objective evidence of value (
“VSOE”), when available, or an estimate of selling price when VSOE is
not
available for a given unit of accounting. Significant inputs for the estimates of the selling price of separate units of accounting include market and pricing trends and a customer’s geographic location. The Company accounts for training and installation, and service agreements and the collection, processing and testing of the umbilical cord blood and the storage as separate units of accounting.
 
Service revenue generated from contracts for providing maintenance of equipment is amortized over the life of the agreement.
Revenue generated from storage contracts is deferred and recorded ratably over the life of the agreement, up to
21
years.
All other service revenue is recognized at the time the service is completed.
 
Revenues are net of normal discounts. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net revenues, while the related costs are included in cost of revenues.
 
Fair Value
Measurements
In accordance with ASC
820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
,” fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date.
 
The guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs
that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. The guidance establishes
three
levels of inputs that
may
be used to measure fair value:
 
 
Level
1:
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level
2:
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
 
Level
3:
Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity
’s own assumptions.
 
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivabl
e and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short duration. The fair value of the Company’s derivative obligation liability is classified as Level
3
within the fair value hierarchy since the valuation model of the derivative obligation is based on unobservable inputs.
 
Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), or decision making group, whose function is to allocate resources to and assess the performance of the operating
segments. The Company has identified its chief executive officer and chief operating officer as the CODM. In determining its reportable segments, the Company considered the markets and the products or services provided to those markets.
 
The Company has
two
reportable business segments:
 
T
he Clinical Development Division, is devel
op
ing autologous (utilizing the patient’s own cells) stem cell-based
therapeutics
that address significant unmet medical needs for applications within the
vascular, cardiology and orthopedic
markets.
 
T
he Device Division, engages in the development and commercialization of automated technologies for c
ell-based t
herapeutics
and bio-processing. The device division is operated through the Company’s ThermoGenesis subsidiary.
 
Net Loss per Share
Net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The calculation
of the basic and diluted earnings per share is the same for all periods presented, as the effect of the potential common stock equivalents is anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss position for all periods presented. Anti-dilutive securities consisted of the following at
September 30:
 
   
2017
   
2016
 
Vested Series A warrants
   
404,412
     
404,412
 
Unvested Series A warrants
(1)
   
698,529
     
698,529
 
Warrants
– other
   
3,725,782
     
3,725,782
 
Stock options
   
420,185
     
270,016
 
Restricted stock units
   
9,163
     
161,170
 
Total
   
5,258,071
     
5,259,909
 
 
 
(
1
)
The unvested Series A warrants were subject to vesting based upon the amount of funds actually received
by the Company in the
second
close of the
August 2015
financing which never occurred. The warrants will remain outstanding but unvested until they expire in
February 2021
.
 
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
In
March 2016,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2016
-
09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic
718
): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”.
ASU
2016
-
09
simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU
2016
-
09
effective
July 1, 2017.
The Company has elected to continue its current policy of estimating forfeitures rather than recognizing forfeitures when they occur. Adoption of the new standard did
not
have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
 
In
July 2015,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2015
-
11,
Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
”, that requires inventory
not
measured using either the last in,
first
out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable cost of completion, disposal and transportation. The Company adopted ASU
2015
-
11
effective
July 1, 2017.
Adoption of the new standard did
not
have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
 
Recently Issued Accounting
Standards
In
May 2014,
the FASB issued ASU
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
)
” (“ASU
2014
-
09”
). ASU
2014
-
09
supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic
605,
“Revenue Recognition” and some cost guidance included in ASC Subtopic
605
-
35,
"
Revenue Recognition
 
- Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts
.” The core principle of ASU
2014
-
09
is that revenue is recognized when the transfer of goods or services to customers occurs in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU
2014
-
09
requires the disclosure of sufficient information to enable readers of the Company’s financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. ASU
2014
-
09
also requires disclosure of information regarding significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU
2014
-
09
provides
two
methods of retrospective application. The
first
method would require the Company to apply ASU
2014
-
09
to each prior reporting period presented. The
second
method would require the Company to retrospectively apply ASU
2014
-
09
with the cumulative effect recognized at the date of initial application. ASU
2014
-
09
will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal
2018
as a result of ASU
2015
-
14,
"
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
): Deferral of the Effective Date
," which was issued by the FASB in
August 2015
and extended the original effective date by
one
year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the available methodologies of ASU
2014
-
09
and
2015
-
14
upon its financial statements in future reporting periods. The Company is also in the process of evaluating the new standard against its existing accounting policies, including the timing of revenue recognition, and its contracts with customers to determine the effect the guidance will have on its financial statements and what changes to systems and controls
may
be warranted.