XML 30 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2016
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial assets or liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.  The asset’s or liability’s classification within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  The Company has not elected a fair value option on any assets or liabilities. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. Generally, this includes debt and equity securities that are traded on an active exchange market (e.g., New York Stock Exchange) as well as certain U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2 Inputs – Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, etc.) or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 Inputs – Valuations based on models where significant inputs are not observable.  The unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use.

The availability of observable market data is monitored to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy.  Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another.  In such instances, the transfer is reported at the beginning of the reporting period.  There were no transfers in or out of levels 1, 2 or 3 during fiscal years 2016, 2015 or 2014.

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis is summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy in the following table.

  
Balance at July 31, 2016
 
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
 
  
(in thousands)
 
Assets
            
Investment securities available for sale
 
$
1,598
  
$
---
  
$
---
  
$
1,598
 

  
Balance at July 31, 2015
 
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
 
  
(in thousands)
 
Assets
            
Investment securities available for sale
 
$
1,434
  
$
---
  
$
---
  
$
1,434
 

The Company recorded gross unrealized gains (losses) of less than $0.1 million related to investment securities available for sale in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at July 31, 2016 and 2015 and 2014.  The Company did not record any sales of investment securities during the twelve months ended July 31, 2016.

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value at July 31, 2016 and 2015.  These assets were classified as level 1 instruments at both dates.
 
Long-term debt consists of bank loans and capitalized equipment leases.  Lines of credit consist of borrowings for working capital requirements.  Based on the Company's assessment of the current financial market and corresponding risks associated with the debt and line of credit borrowings, management believes that the carrying amount of these liabilities approximated fair value at July 31, 2016 and 2015.  These liabilities were classified as level 2 instruments at both dates.  Refer to Note 10 and Note 11 of these consolidated financial statements for additional disclosures regarding the Company’s lines of credit, debt and capital lease obligations.