XML 62 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair value measurements
Fair value measurements
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis, a three-level hierarchy of measurements based upon observable and unobservable inputs is used to arrive at fair value. Observable inputs are developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our assumptions about valuation based on the best information available in the circumstances. Depending on the inputs, we classify each fair value measurement as follows:
Level 1—based upon quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets,
Level 2—based upon quoted prices for similar instruments, prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or model-derived valuations, all of whose significant inputs are observable, and
Level 3—based upon one or more significant unobservable inputs.
The following section describes key inputs and assumptions in our valuation methodologies:
Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash Equivalents—We classify highly liquid investments, with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase, including U.S. Treasury bills, federal agency securities, and commercial paper, as cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these instruments.
Marketable Securities—Our marketable securities portfolios are classified as available-for-sale and primarily include investments in U.S. government and commercial paper with a maturity of greater than 90 days at the date of purchase. We use quoted prices from active markets to determine fair value.
Derivative Assets and Liabilities—We measure the fair value of derivatives assuming that the unit of account is an individual derivative transaction and that each derivative could be sold or transferred on a stand-alone basis. We classify within Level 2 our derivatives that are traded over-the-counter and valued using internal models based on observable market inputs. In certain cases, market data is not available and we estimate inputs such as in situations where trading in a particular commodity is not active. Measurements based upon these unobservable inputs are classified within Level 3. For more information regarding derivatives, see Note 11, Financial instruments and commodity contracts.
Retained Interests—We retain certain interests in receivables sold in off-balance sheet securitization transactions prior to November 1, 2010. We estimate the fair value of retained interests using internal valuation models that incorporate market inputs and our own assumptions about future cash flows. The fair value of retained interests is estimated based on the present value of monthly collections on the sold finance receivables in excess of amounts accruing to investors and other obligations arising in securitization transactions. In addition to the amount of debt and collateral held by the securitization vehicle, the three key inputs that affect the valuation of the retained interests include credit losses, payment speed, and the discount rate. We classify these assets within Level 3. 
Guarantees—We provide certain guarantees of payments and residual values to specific counterparties.  Fair value of these guarantees is based upon internally developed models that utilize current market-based assumptions and historical data.  We classify these liabilities within Level 3.  For more information regarding guarantees, see Note 12, Commitments and contingencies.
The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
 
January 31, 2012
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury bills
 
$
199

 
$

 
$

 
$
199

Other U.S. and non-U.S. government bonds
 
220

 

 

 
220

Other
 
20

 

 

 
20

Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
 

 

 

 

Commodity contracts
 

 
1

 

 
1

Total assets
 
$
439

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
440

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
 
$

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

Commodity contracts
 

 
4

 

 
4

Guarantees
 

 

 
7

 
7

Total liabilities
 
$

 
$
5

 
$
7

 
$
12

 
 
As of October 31, 2011
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury bills
 
$
283

 
$

 
$

 
$
283

Other U.S and non-U.S. government bonds
 
415

 

 

 
415

Other
 
20

 

 

 
20

Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
 

 

 
1

 
1

Foreign currency contracts
 

 
3

 

 
3

Total assets
 
$
718

 
$
3

 
$
1

 
$
722

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
 
$

 
$
3

 
$
3

 
$
6

Cross currency swaps
 

 
4

 

 
4

Guarantees
 

 

 
6

 
6

Total liabilities
 
$

 
$
7

 
$
9

 
$
16


The table below presents the changes for those financial instruments classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:
 
Three Months Ended January 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
Guarantees
 
Retained interests
 
Commodity contracts
 
Guarantees
 
Retained interests
 
Commodity contracts
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at November 1
$
6

 
$

 
$
(2
)
 
$

 
$
53

 
$
2

Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized) included in earnings(A)

 

 
(1
)
 

 
1

 
4

Transfers into Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3

 

 
2

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

Issuances
1

 

 

 

 

 

Settlements

 

 
1

 

 
(54
)
 
(1
)
Balance at January 31
$
7

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
5

Change in unrealized gains on assets and liabilities still held
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
3

_____________ 
(A)
For commodity contracts, gains (losses) are included in Costs of products sold. For retained interests, gains recognized are included in Finance revenues.
The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
 
 
Level 2
 
 
January 31, 2012
 
October 31, 2011
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
Finance receivables(A)
 
$
7

 
$
5

 _____________
(A)
Certain impaired finance receivables are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. An impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the receivables exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of remarketing costs. As of January 31, 2012, impaired receivables with a carrying amount of $17 million had specific loss reserves of $10 million and a fair value of $7 million. As of October 31, 2011, impaired receivables with a carrying amount of $15 million had specific loss reserves of $10 million and a fair value of $5 million. Fair values of the underlying collateral are determined by reference to dealer vehicle value publications adjusted for certain market factors.
In addition to the methods and assumptions we use for the financial instruments recorded at fair value as discussed above, we use the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value for our other financial instruments that are not marked to market on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and accounts payable approximate fair values because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these instruments. Finance receivables generally consist of retail and wholesale accounts and retail and wholesale notes. The carrying amounts of trade and other receivables and retail and wholesale accounts approximate fair values as a result of the short term nature of the receivables. Fair values of wholesale notes approximate amortized cost as a result of the short-term nature and variable interest rate terms charged on wholesale notes. Due to the nature of the aforementioned financial instruments, they have been excluded from the fair value amounts presented in the table below. The fair values of our retail notes are estimated by discounting expected cash flows at estimated current market rates. We also use quoted market prices, when available, or the present value of estimated future cash flows to determine fair values of debt instruments.
The carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments are summarized in the table below:
 
 
January 31, 2012
 
October 31, 2011
 
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair  Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair  Value
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail notes
 
$
856

 
$
805

 
$
958

 
$
902

Notes receivable
 
43

 
42

 
47

 
47

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Manufacturing operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021
 
871

 
995

 
967

 
1,131

3.0% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2014(A)
 
502

 
665

 
497

 
633

Debt of majority-owned dealerships
 
92

 
88

 
94

 
88

Financing arrangements
 
137

 
125

 
114

 
112

Loan Agreement related to 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040
 
225

 
246

 
225

 
234

Promissory Note
 
38

 
38

 
40

 
39

Asset-Based Credit Facility
 
100

 
100

 

 

Other
 
42

 
39

 
39

 
26

Financial services operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at various rates, due serially through 2018
 
1,371

 
1,395

 
1,664

 
1,695

Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2013 through 2017
 
997

 
985

 
1,072

 
1,091

Commercial paper, at variable rates, due serially through 2012
 
63

 
63

 
70

 
70

Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2017
 
72

 
71

 
70

 
70

___________________ 
(A)
The carrying value represents the financial statement amount of the debt after allocation of the conversion feature to equity, while the fair value is based on quoted market prices for the convertible note which includes the equity feature.