2.2.0.25falsefalse0205 - Disclosure - Commitments and Contingenciestruefalsefalse1falsefalseUSDfalsefalse1/1/2010 - 12/31/2010 USD ($) USD ($) / shares $Jan-01-2010_Dec-31-2010http://www.sec.gov/CIK0000805022duration2010-01-01T00:00:002010-12-31T00:00:00USDStandardhttp://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217USDiso42170SharesStandardhttp://www.xbrl.org/2003/instancesharesxbrli0USDEPSDividehttp://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217USDiso4217http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instancesharesxbrli0USDUSD$2true0bpl_CommitmentsAndContingenciesAbstractbplfalsenadurationCommitments And Contingencies.falsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00falsefalsefalsefalsefalseOtherxbrli:stringItemTypestringCommitments And Contingencies.falsefalseCommitments and Contingencies [Abstract]3false0us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlockus-gaaptruenadurationNo definition available.falsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalseverboselabel1falsefalsefalse00  <div style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',Times,serif"> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 12pt"><b>5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES</b> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt; margin-left: 1%"><i>Claims and Proceedings</i> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various claims and legal proceedings, some of which are covered by insurance. We are generally unable to predict the timing or outcome of these claims and proceedings. Based upon our evaluation of existing claims and proceedings and the probability of losses relating to such contingencies, we have accrued certain amounts relating to such claims and proceedings, none of which are considered material. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In June 2009, the Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) proposed penalties totaling approximately $0.6 million as a result of alleged violations of various pipeline safety requirements raised as a result of PHMSA’s 2008 integrated inspection of our procedures and records for operations and maintenance, operator qualification, and integrity management as well as field inspections of locations in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan and Colorado. We are contesting portions of the proposed penalty. The timing or outcome of final resolution of this matter cannot reasonably be determined at this time. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In April 2010, PHMSA proposed penalties totaling approximately $0.5 million in connection with a tank overfill incident that occurred at our facility in East Chicago, Indiana, in May 2005 and other related personnel qualification issues raised as a result of PHMSA’s 2008 Integrity Inspection. We are contesting the proposed penalty. The timing or outcome of this appeal cannot reasonably be determined at this time. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In January 2011, PHMSA issued us a final order with penalties totaling $0.2 million in connection with issues related to documentation, inspection and physical signage of certain of our pipelines raised as a result of PHMSA’s 2005 — 2006 inspection of certain facilities in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan as well as compliance records. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In January 2011, PHMSA issued us a final order with penalties totaling $0.1 million in connection with an employee’s failure to follow certain pipeline-marking procedures in connection with a product release that occurred in New York, New York in November 2009. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     On July 30, 2010, a putative class action was filed by a unitholder against BGH, MainLine Management LLC (“MainLine Management”), BGH GP and each of MainLine Management’s directors in the District Court of Harris County, Texas under the caption <i>Broadbased Equities v. Forrest E. Wylie, et. al. </i>In the Petition, the plaintiff alleged that MainLine Management and its directors breached their fiduciary duties to BGH’s public unitholders by, among other things, acting to facilitate the sale of BGH to Buckeye in order to facilitate the gradual sale by BGH GP of its interest in BGH and failing to disclose all material facts in order that the BGH unitholders can cast an informed vote on the Merger Agreement. Among other things, the Petition sought an order certifying a class consisting of all BGH unitholders, a determination that the action is a proper derivative action, damages in an unspecified amount, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     On August 2, 2010, a putative class action was filed by a unitholder against BGH, MainLine Management, Merger Sub, Buckeye, Buckeye GP and each of MainLine Management’s directors in the District Court of Harris County, Texas under the caption <i>Henry James Steward v. Forrest E. Wylie, et. al. </i>In the Petition, the plaintiff alleged that MainLine Management and its directors breached their fiduciary duties to BGH’s public unitholders by, among other things, failing to disclose all material facts in order that the BGH unitholders can cast an informed vote on the Merger Agreement. The Petition also alleged that Buckeye, Buckeye GP and Merger Sub aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty. Among other things, the Petition sought an order certifying a plaintiff class consisting of all of BGH unitholders, an order enjoining the Merger, rescission of the Merger, damages in an unspecified amount, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     On August 2, 2010, a putative class action was filed by a unitholder against BGH, MainLine Management, BGH GP, ArcLight, Kelso & Company (“Kelso”), Buckeye, Buckeye GP and each of MainLine Management’s directors, in the District Court of Harris County, Texas under the caption <i>JR Garrett Trust v. Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. et al. </i>In the Petition, the plaintiff alleged that MainLine Management and its directors breached their fiduciary duties to BGH’s public unitholders by, among other things, accepting insufficient consideration, failing to condition the Merger on a majority vote of public unitholders of BGH, and failing to disclose all material facts in order that the BGH unitholders can cast an informed vote on the Merger Agreement. The Petition also alleged that Buckeye, Buckeye GP, BGH GP, ArcLight and Kelso aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty. Among other things, the Petition sought an order certifying a class consisting of all of BGH’s unitholders, an order enjoining the Merger, damages in an unspecified amount, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     On August 24, 2010, the District Court of Harris County, Texas, entered an order consolidating three previously filed putative class actions (<i>Broadbased Equities v. Forrest E. Wylie, et. al</i>., <i>Henry James Steward v. Forrest E. Wylie, et. al.</i>, and <i>JR Garrett Trust v. Buckeye GP Holdings L.P., et al.,</i>) under the caption of <i>Broadbased Equities v. Forrest E. Wylie, et al. </i>and appointing interim co-lead class counsel and interim co-liaison counsel. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a consolidated amended class action and derivative complaint on September 1, 2010 (the “Complaint”). The Complaint purports to be a putative class and derivative action alleging that MainLine Management and its directors breached their fiduciary duties to BGH’s public unitholders in connection with the Merger by, among other things, accepting insufficient consideration and failing to disclose all material facts in order that BGH’s unitholders may cast an informed vote on the Merger Agreement, and that we, Buckeye GP, MainLine Management, Merger Sub, BGH GP, ArcLight and Kelso aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty. </div>   </div>  <div style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',Times,serif"> <div align="center" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 0pt"> <b> </b> <b> </b> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     On October 29, 2010, the parties to the litigation entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) in connection with a proposed settlement of the class action and the Complaint. The MOU provides for dismissal with prejudice of the litigation and a release of the defendants from all present and future claims asserted in the litigation in exchange for, among other things, the agreement of the defendants to amend the Merger Agreement to reduce the termination fees payable by BGH upon termination of the Merger Agreement and to provide BGH’s unitholders with supplemental disclosure to BGH’s and our joint proxy statement/prospectus, dated September 24, 2010. The supplemental disclosure is set forth in a joint proxy statement/prospectus supplement, dated October 29, 2010, which was filed with the SEC on November 1, 2010. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In addition, the MOU provides that, in settlement of the plaintiffs’ claims (including any claim against the defendants by the plaintiffs’ counsel for attorneys’ fees or expenses related to the litigation), the defendants (or their insurers) will pay a cash payment of $900,000, subject to final court approval of the settlement. On January 25, 2011, pursuant to the MOU, the parties signed a Stipulation of Settlement. The Stipulation of Settlement has not yet been filed with the court. The proposed settlement is subject to several conditions, including, without limitation, court approval. There is no assurance that the court will approve the settlement. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     We and the other defendants vigorously deny all liability with respect to the facts and claims alleged in the Complaint, and specifically deny that any modifications to the Merger Agreement or any supplemental disclosure was required or advisable under any applicable rule, statute, regulation or law. However, to avoid the substantial burden, expense, risk, inconvenience and distraction of continuing the litigation, and to fully and finally resolve the claims alleged, we and the other defendants agreed to the proposed settlement described above. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt; margin-left: 1%"><i>Environmental Contingencies</i> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In accordance with our accounting policy, we recorded operating expenses, net of insurance recoveries, of $8.5 million, $10.6 million and $10.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to environmental expenditures unrelated to claims and proceedings. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt; margin-left: 1%"><i>Ammonia Contract Contingencies</i> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     On November 30, 2005, BDL (formerly Buckeye Gulf Coast Pipe Lines, L.P.) purchased an ammonia pipeline and other assets from El Paso Merchant Energy-Petroleum Company (“EPME”), a subsidiary of El Paso Corporation (“El Paso”). As part of the transaction, BDL assumed the obligations of EPME under several contracts involving monthly purchases and sales of ammonia. EPME and BDL agreed, however, that EPME would retain the economic risks and benefits associated with those contracts until their expiration at the end of 2012. To effectuate this agreement, BDL passes through to EPME both the cost of purchasing ammonia under a supply contract and the proceeds from selling ammonia under three sales contracts. For the vast majority of monthly periods since the closing of the pipeline acquisition, the pricing terms of the ammonia contracts have resulted in ammonia costs exceeding ammonia sales proceeds. The amount of the shortfall generally increases as the market price of ammonia increases. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     EPME has informed BDL that, notwithstanding the parties’ agreement, it will not continue to pay BDL for shortfalls created by the pass-through of ammonia costs in excess of ammonia revenues. EPME encouraged BDL to seek payment by invoking a $40.0 million guaranty made by El Paso, which guaranteed EPME’s obligations to BDL. If EPME fails to reimburse BDL for these shortfalls for a significant period during the remainder of the term of the ammonia agreements, then such unreimbursed shortfalls could exceed the $40.0 million cap on El Paso’s guaranty. To the extent the unreimbursed shortfalls significantly exceed the $40.0 million cap, the resulting costs incurred by BDL could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. To date, BDL has continued to receive payment for ammonia costs under the contracts at issue. BDL has not called on El Paso’s guaranty and believes only BDL may invoke the guaranty. EPME, however, contends that El Paso’s guaranty is the source of payment for the shortfalls, but has not clarified the extent to which it believes the guaranty has been exhausted. We have been working with EPME to terminate the ammonia sales contracts and ammonia supply contracts and, at no out of pocket cost to us, have terminated one of the ammonia sales contracts. Given, however, the uncertainty of future ammonia prices and EPME’s future actions, we continue to believe we may have risk of loss and, at this time, are unable to estimate the amount of any such losses we might incur in the future. We are assessing our options in the event that we and EPME are unable to terminate the remaining contracts or otherwise mitigate the remaining risk, including potential recourse against EPME and El Paso, with respect to this matter. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt; margin-left: 1%"><i>Customer Bankruptcy</i> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     One of our customers filed for bankruptcy in October 2009 and approximately $4.1 million remained payable to us from the customer pursuant to a pre-bankruptcy contract. In June 2010, we entered into a court approved settlement with the bankrupt customer and its largest creditor pursuant to which we were to be paid at least $2.0 million in cash, and we were released from both asserted and unasserted claims. In August 2010, we received a settlement payment of $2.0 million. As a result of the settlement, our Development & Logistics segment recognized approximately $2.1 million in expense related to the write-off of a portion of the outstanding receivable balance during the year ended December 31, 2010. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt; margin-left: 1%"><i>Leases —Where We are Lessee</i> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     We lease certain property, plant and equipment under noncancelable and cancelable operating leases. Lease expense is charged to operating expenses on a straight-line basis over the period of expected benefit. Contingent rental payments are expensed as incurred. Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $21.3 million, $21.2 million and $20.2 million, respectively. The following table presents minimum lease payment obligations under our operating leases with terms in excess of one year for the years ending December 31 (in thousands): </div> <div align="center"> <table style="font-size: 10pt; text-align: left" cellspacing="0" border="0" cellpadding="0" width="80%">  <tr valign="bottom"> <td width="64%"> </td> <td width="5%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> <td width="5%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> <td width="3%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> <td width="5%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> <td width="3%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> <td width="5%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 8pt" valign="bottom"> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2"><b>Office space</b></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2"><b>Land</b></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2"> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 8pt" valign="bottom"> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #000000"><b>and other</b> (1)</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #000000"><b>Leases</b> (2)</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #000000"><b>Total</b></td> <td> </td> </tr>   <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">  </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2011 </div></td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">2,042</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">3,117</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">5,159</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2012 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">1,513</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">3,340</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">4,853</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2013 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">1,562</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">3,466</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">5,028</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2014 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">1,615</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">3,550</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">5,165</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2015 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">1,670</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">3,674</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">5,344</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">Thereafter </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">9,528</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">290,591</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">300,119</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 1px"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">  </div></td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 1px solid #000000"> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 1px solid #000000"> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 1px solid #000000"> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:30px; text-indent:-15px">Total </div></td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">17,930</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">307,738</td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">325,668</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 1px"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">  </div></td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 3px double #000000"> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 3px double #000000"> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 3px double #000000"> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">  </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr>  </table> </div> <div align="left"> <div style="font-size: 3pt; margin-top: 16pt; width: 18%; border-top: 1px solid #000000">  </div> </div> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="font-size: 10pt; text-align: left"> <tr> <td width="3%"></td> <td width="1%"></td> <td width="96%"></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="left">(1)</td> <td> </td> <td>We lease certain other land and space in office buildings.</td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 3pt"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="left">(2)</td> <td> </td> <td>We have leases for subsurface underground gas storage rights and surface rights in connection with our operations in the Natural Gas Storage segment. We may cancel these leases if the storage reservoir is not used for underground storage of natural gas or the removal or injection thereof for a continuous period of two consecutive years. Lease expense associated with these leases, which is being recognized on a straight-line basis over 44 years, was approximately $7.1 million, $7.4 million and $7.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, $4.2 million and $4.5 million, respectively, was recorded as an increase in our deferred lease liability. We estimate that the deferred lease liability will continue to increase through 2032, at which time our deferred lease liability is estimated to be approximately $64.7 million. Our deferred lease liability will then be reduced over the remaining 19 years of the lease, since the expected annual lease payments will exceed the amount of lease expense.</td> </tr> </table>   </div>  <div style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',Times,serif"> <div align="center" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 0pt"> <b> </b> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt; margin-left: 1%"><i>Leases — Where We are Lessor</i> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     We have entered into capacity leases with remaining terms from 5 to 12 years that are accounted for as operating leases. All of the agreements provide for negotiated extensions. Future minimum lease payments to be received under such operating leasing arrangements as of December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands): </div> <div align="center"> <table style="font-size: 10pt; text-align: left" cellspacing="0" border="0" cellpadding="0" width="50%">  <tr valign="bottom"> <td width="88%"> </td> <td width="5%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> <td width="5%"> </td> <td width="1%"> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 8pt" valign="bottom"> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2"><b>Years Ending</b></td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 8pt" valign="bottom"> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #000000"><b>December 31,</b></td> <td> </td> </tr>   <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">  </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2011 </div></td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">13,581</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2012 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">13,581</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2013 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">13,581</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2014 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">11,526</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">2015 </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">11,152</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">Thereafter </div></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td align="right">50,890</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 1px"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">  </div></td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 1px solid #000000"> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr valign="bottom" style="background: #cceeff"> <td> <div style="margin-left:30px; text-indent:-15px">Total </div></td> <td> </td> <td align="left">$</td> <td align="right">114,311</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr style="font-size: 1px"> <td> <div style="margin-left:15px; text-indent:-15px">  </div></td> <td> </td> <td nowrap="nowrap" colspan="2" align="right" style="border-top: 3px double #000000"> </td> <td> </td> </tr>  </table> </div> <div align="left"> </div> </div>  <!-- Begin Block Tagged NotefalsefalsefalsefalsefalseOtherus-types:textBlockItemTypestringIncludes disclosure of commitments and contingencies. This element may be used as a single block of text to encapsulate the entire disclosure including data and tables.Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name FASB Interpretation (FIN) -Number 14 -Paragraph 3 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 5 -Paragraph 9, 10, 11, 12 falsefalseCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES12Commitments and ContingenciesUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownfalsetrue