XML 27 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is allocated by reportable segment as follows:
 
Beauty, Hair and Personal Care
 
Grooming
 
Health Care
 
Fabric Care and Home Care
 
Baby, Feminine and Family Care
 
Corporate
 
Total Company
GOODWILL at June 30, 2014
$
17,040

 
$
20,939

 
$
6,280

 
$
4,535

 
$
4,910

 
$

 
$
53,704

Acquisitions and divestitures

 

 

 
(2
)
 

 

 
(2
)
Goodwill impairment charges

 

 

 
(863
)
 

 

 
(863
)
Translation and other
(586
)
 
(512
)
 
(155
)
 
(85
)
 
(140
)
 

 
(1,478
)
GOODWILL at September 30, 2014
$
16,454

 
$
20,427

 
$
6,125

 
$
3,585

 
$
4,770

 
$

 
$
51,361



During the quarter ended September 30, 2014, we determined that the estimated fair value of our Batteries reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. The underlying fair value assessment was triggered by an agreement that was reached in the quarter to sell a portion of the Batteries business and a related decision to pursue options to exit the remainder of the Batteries business. As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014, the results of our annual goodwill impairment testing during fiscal 2014 indicated a decline in the fair value of the Batteries reporting unit due to lower long-term market growth assumptions in certain key geographies. At that time, the estimated fair value of Batteries continued to exceed its underlying carrying value, but the fair value cushion had been reduced to about 5%. The agreement during the most recent quarter to sell a portion of the Batteries business is at a transaction value that is below the earnings multiple implied from the prior valuation of our Batteries business, which effectively eliminated our fair value cushion. As a result, the remaining business unit cash flows no longer support the remaining carrying amount of the Batteries business. In addition, management made the decision in October to pursue alternatives to exit the remainder of the Batteries business, which could include a sale or split-off transaction. The timing of any such transaction is uncertain.

Due largely to the above factors, we recorded a non-cash before and after-tax impairment charge of $863 to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill for the Batteries business unit to its estimated fair value. Following the impairment charge, the carrying value of the Batteries goodwill was $1,344. These same factors resulted in a decline in the fair value of our Duracell brand intangible asset below its carrying value. This resulted in a non-cash, before-tax impairment charge of $110 ($69 after tax) to reduce the carrying amount of this asset to its estimated fair value. The carrying value of our Duracell brand intangible asset was $2,135 as of September 30, 2014.

The test to evaluate goodwill for impairment is a two-step process. In the first step, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a second step to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill. The second step of the impairment analysis requires a valuation of a reporting unit's tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price in a business combination. If the resulting implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is less than its carrying value, that difference represents an impairment. The impairment charges are included in Corporate for segment reporting.

The business unit valuations used to test goodwill and intangible assets for impairment are dependent on a number of significant estimates and assumptions, including macroeconomic conditions, overall category growth rates, competitive activities, cost containment and margin expansion and Company business plans.  We believe these estimates and assumptions are reasonable.  However, actual events and results of the Batteries reporting unit could differ substantially from those used in our valuations.  To the extent such factors result in a reduction of the level of projected cash flows used to estimate the Batteries reporting unit fair value, we may need to record additional non-cash impairment charges in the future.

In addition, as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014, a key competitor announced its intent to split its consolidated business into two separate companies during 2015.  One of those companies would operate primarily in the batteries category.  While this proposed transaction has not been consummated, initial independent third party estimates of the competitor’s stand-alone batteries business valuation are below the earnings multiple implied from the most recent valuation of our Batteries business.  We attribute the implied valuation difference primarily to our more favorable business trends, primarily organic net sales and share growth, and brand equity. If our evaluation of exit alternatives results in the execution of a divestiture transaction, such a divestiture could result in an additional loss that could be material depending on the form of the transaction and/or valuations utilized by potential acquirers.

In addition to the impairment charge, goodwill decreased from June 30, 2014 due to currency translation across all reportable segments.

Identifiable intangible assets at September 30, 2014 are comprised of:
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
Intangible assets with determinable lives
$
9,120

  
$
(5,221
)
Intangible assets with indefinite lives
26,311

  

Total identifiable intangible assets
$
35,431

  
$
(5,221
)


Intangible assets with determinable lives consist of brands, patents, technology and customer relationships. The intangible assets with indefinite lives consist primarily of brands. The amortization of intangible assets for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $119 and $134, respectively.