XML 81 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Note 14 - Commitments And Contingencies  
Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies

Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies

 

Leases

 

In 2010, the Company entered into a lease agreement for 6,400 square feet of office space located in Newburyport, Massachusetts. This lease was effective from August 2010 through July 2013. This agreement provided a free rent period of the first four months of the term.

 

In August 2013, the Company executed a lease for 8,713 square feet for its corporate offices located in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The lease commenced on August 9, 2013 and has a five-year term ending on September 8, 2018. The monthly rental payments for the first year are $10,165 per month and will increase on each anniversary at a rate of 3% per annum. The Company is required to pay its proportionate share of the building’s common area maintenance (“CAM”), real estate taxes, utilities serving the premises and the cost of premises janitorial service. These additional items are estimated to be $5,900 on a monthly basis.

 

In September 2013, the Company executed a lease for office space located in Palo Alto, California. The lease commenced on September 1, 2013 with monthly payments of $600 per month and has a twelve month term ending on August 31, 2014. The Company has sublet partial space of the office in Palo Alto for $300 a month through the end of the rental term ending on August 31, 2014.

 

The minimum lease payments payable over the remaining life of the agreements are:

 

    2014     2015     2016     2017     2018  
Remaining lease payments by year   $ 128,602     $ 128,890     $ 130,695     $ 134,646     $ 91,454  
                                         

 

          For the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized approximately $98,000 and $89,000 respectively in rent expense.

 

Legal

 

In February 2012, Trunity and our former CEO Terry Anderton were served with a complaint filed by an ex-Trunity, employee, William Horn, in the Nashua, New Hampshire, Superior Court. The plaintiff served as Executive Vice President of Marketing & Business Development from March until August 2011 at an annual salary of $100,000. He asserts whistleblower status and alleges that he was wrongfully terminated because of his allegations that the Company had violated securities, tax and employment laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages under the New Hampshire Whistleblower Act and common law, including reinstatement, back pay and attorney’s fees and costs. In May 2012, we responded to the complaint by denying all material allegations and filing a counterclaim against the plaintiff for breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual and business relations, breach of fiduciary duty and violation of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Discovery has begun; a deposition of Mr. Horn was conducted on March 25, 2013.  No expert has been disclosed by Mr. Horn for liability or damages.

 

On June 13, 2013, the Court granted our Motion to Dismiss Terry Anderton, in his individual capacity, from the case. Therefore, Trunity remains the sole defendant in this matter. We continue to proceed with discovery and may schedule a second deposition of the plaintiff based upon the additional documents and information produced by the plaintiff pursuant to the Court’s Order. As discovery continues, third party depositions are expected to be scheduled.

 

Trial of the case is now scheduled for the weeks of June 16 and June 23, 2014. Pretrial materials are due May 23, 2014 and a trial conference has been scheduled for June 6, 2014.  Based on the preliminary information available to us, we believe that the complaint is without merit and intend to vigorously defend the case and prosecute the counterclaim.

 

Mediation is mandatory in New Hampshire.  A half-day mediation has been scheduled for April 14, 2014.  To date, there has not been a settlement demand from Plaintiff.  Moreover, at this point in the litigation, Trunity has paid in full the deductible under the applicable insurance policy and the insurance company is paying for the defense of this case.

 

There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is subject and, to the best of our knowledge, no such actions against us are contemplated or threatened.