XML 41 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Derivative Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Financial Instruments Derivative Financial Instruments
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
Webster manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding in conjunction with the use of interest rate derivative financial instruments. Webster enters into interest rate derivatives to mitigate the exposure related to business activities that result in the receipt or payment of, both future known and uncertain, cash amounts that are impacted by interest rates. The primary objective for using interest rate derivatives is to add stability to interest expense by managing exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, Webster uses interest rate swaps and interest rate caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.
Interest rate swaps and interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges are designed to manage the risk associated with a forecasted event or an uncertain variable-rate cash flow. Forward-settle interest rate swaps protect the Company against adverse fluctuations in interest rates by reducing its exposure to variability in cash flows relating to interest payments on forecasted debt issuances. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for payment of an up-front premium.
Cash flow hedges are used to regulate the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt and forecasted issuances of debt. Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of derivatives which are designated as cash flow hedges, and that qualify for hedge accounting, is recorded to AOCL and is reclassified into earnings in the subsequent periods that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of these derivatives, attributable to the difference in the effective date of the hedge and the effective date of the debt issuance, is recognized directly in earnings. During the periods presented, there was no ineffectiveness to be recognized in earnings.
Certain fixed-rate obligations can be exposed to a change in fair value attributable to changes in benchmark interest rates. On occasion, interest rate swaps will be used to manage this exposure. An interest rate swap which involves the receipt of fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for Webster making variable-rate payments over the life of the agreement, without the exchange of the underlying notional amount, is designated as a fair value hedge. For a qualifying derivative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as the gain or loss on the hedged item, is recognized in interest expense. During the periods presented, Webster did not have interest rate derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges and as a result, there was no impact to interest expense.
Additionally, in order to address certain other risk management matters, the Company also utilizes derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivative instruments, which are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized each period as other non-interest income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income, are described in the following paragraphs.
Interest rate swap and cap contracts are sold to commercial and other customers who wish to modify loan interest rate sensitivity. These contracts are offset with dealer counterparty transactions structured with matching terms. As a result, there is minimal impact on earnings, except for fee income earned in such transactions.
RPAs are entered into as financial guarantees of performance on interest rate swap derivatives. The purchased (asset) or sold (liability) guarantee allows the Company to participate-in (fee received) or participate-out (fee paid) the risk associated with certain derivative positions executed with the borrower by a lead bank in a loan syndication.
Other derivatives include foreign currency forward contracts related to lending arrangements, a VISA equity swap transaction, and mortgage banking derivatives such as mortgage-backed securities related to residential loan commitments and loans held for sale. Mortgage banking derivatives are utilized by Webster in its efforts to manage risk of loss associated with its mortgage loan commitments and mortgage loans held for sale. Prior to closing and funding certain single-family residential mortgage loans interest rate lock commitments are generally extended to the borrowers. During the period from commitment date to closing date, Webster is subject to the risk that market rates of interest may change. If market rates rise, investors generally will pay less to purchase such loans causing a reduction in the anticipated gain on sale of the loans and possibly resulting in a loss. In an effort to mitigate such risk, forward delivery sales commitments are established under which Webster agrees to deliver whole mortgage loans to various investors or issue mortgage-backed securities. Mandatory forward commitments establish the price to be received upon the sale of the related mortgage loan, thereby mitigating certain interest rate risk. There is, however, still certain execution risk specifically related to Webster’s ability to close and deliver to its investors the mortgage loans it has committed to sell.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the notional amounts and fair values of derivative positions:
 
At December 31, 2017
 
At December 31, 2016
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
(In thousands)
Notional
Amounts
Fair
Value
 
Notional
Amounts
Fair
Value
 
Notional
Amounts
Fair
Value
 
Notional
Amounts
Fair
Value
Designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Positions subject to master netting agreements (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate derivatives
$
325,000

$
2,770

 
$

$

 
$
225,000

$
3,270

 
$
100,000

$
792

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Positions subject to master netting agreements (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate derivatives
2,791,760

5,977

 
721,048

1,968

 
1,943,485

32,226

 
1,242,937

24,388

Mortgage banking derivatives (2)
28,497

421

 
39,230

110

 
103,440

3,084

 
59,895

711

Other
7,914

258

 
30,328

419

 
10,634

231

 
14,265

120

Positions not subject to master netting agreements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate derivatives
1,366,299

23,009

 
2,146,518

25,631

 
1,734,679

38,668

 
1,451,762

19,001

RPAs
93,713

80

 
116,882

111

 
86,037

139

 
87,273

166

Other


 
2,073

184

 
1,438

19

 
181

11

Total not designated as hedging instruments
4,288,183

29,745

 
3,056,079

28,423

 
3,879,713

74,367

 
2,856,313

44,397

Gross derivative instruments, before netting
$
4,613,183

32,515

 
$
3,056,079

28,423

 
$
4,104,713

77,637

 
$
2,956,313

45,189

Less: Legally enforceable master netting agreements
 
2,245

 
 
2,245

 
 
24,252

 
 
24,254

Less: Cash collateral posted
 
6,704

 
 

 
 
11,475

 
 
600

Total derivative instruments, after netting
 
$
23,566

 
 
$
26,178

 
 
$
41,910

 
 
$
20,335


(1)
One of Webster's counterparty relationships was impacted by a Chicago Mercantile Exchange rulebook amendment, resulting in the presentation of that relationship on a settlement basis, as a single unit of account.
(2)
Notional amounts include mandatory forward commitments of $39.0 million, while notional amounts do not include approved floating rate commitments of $11.3 million, at December 31, 2017.
Changes in Fair Value
Changes in the fair value of derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment are reported as a component of other non-interest income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:
 
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Interest rate derivatives
$
2,702

 
$
8,668

 
$
4,361

RPA
242

 
(361
)
 
(33
)
Mortgage banking derivatives
(2,062
)
 
1,553

 
801

Other
(768
)
 
(67
)
 
(63
)
Total impact on other non-interest income
$
114

 
$
9,793

 
$
5,066


Amounts for the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on Webster's variable-rate debt. Over the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $0.8 million will be reclassified from AOCL as an increase to interest expense.
Webster records gains and losses related to swap terminations as OCI. These balances are subsequently amortized into interest expense over the respective terms of the hedged debt instruments. At December 31, 2017, the remaining unamortized loss on the termination of cash flow hedges is $14.9 million. Over the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $6.2 million will be reclassified from AOCL as an increase to interest expense.
Additional information about cash flow hedge activity impacting AOCL, and the related amounts reclassified to interest expense is provided in Note 12: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax. Information about the valuation methods used to measure fair value is provided in Note 16: Fair Value Measurements.
Offsetting Derivatives
Webster has entered into transactions with counterparties that are subject to a legally enforceable master netting agreement. Derivatives subject to a legally enforceable master netting agreement are reported on a net basis, net of cash collateral. Net positions are recorded in other assets for a net gain position and in other liabilities for a net loss position in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, there was $406 thousand cash collateral posted, that was not offset, at December 31, 2017.
The following table is presented on a gross basis, prior to the application of counterparty netting agreements:
 
At December 31, 2017
 
At December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
Gross
Amount
Relationship Offset
Cash Collateral Offset
Net
Amount
 
Gross
Amount
Relationship Offset
Cash Collateral Offset
Net
Amount
Derivative instrument assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged Accounting
$
2,770

$
91

$
2,679

$

 
$
3,270

$
2,335

$
935

$

Non-Hedged Accounting
6,222

2,154

4,025

43

 
32,457

21,917

10,540


Total
$
8,992

$
2,245

$
6,704

$
43

 
$
35,727

$
24,252

$
11,475

$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instrument liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged Accounting
$

$

$

$

 
$
792

$
792

$

$

Non-Hedged Accounting
2,387

2,245


142

 
24,508

23,462

600

446

Total
$
2,387

$
2,245

$

$
142

 
$
25,300

$
24,254

$
600

$
446


Counterparty Credit Risk
Use of derivative contracts may expose the bank to counterparty credit risk. The Company has International Swaps Derivative Association (ISDA) master agreements, including a Credit Support Annex, with all derivative counterparties. The ISDA master agreements provide that on each payment date, all amounts otherwise owing the same currency under the same transaction are netted so that only a single amount is owed in that currency. The ISDA provides, if the parties so elect, for such netting of amounts in the same currency among all transactions identified as being subject to such election that have common payment dates and booking offices. Under the Credit Support Annex, daily net exposure in excess of a negotiated threshold is secured by posted cash collateral. The Company has negotiated a zero threshold with the majority of its approved financial institution counterparties. In accordance with Webster policies, institutional counterparties must be analyzed and approved through the Company’s credit approval process.
The Company’s credit exposure on interest rate derivatives with non-dealer counterparties is limited to the net favorable value, including accrued interest, of all such instruments, reduced by the amount of collateral pledged by the counterparties. The Company's credit exposure related to derivatives with dealer counterparties is significantly mitigated with cash collateral equal to, or in excess of, the market value of the instrument updated daily.
In accordance with counterparty credit agreements and derivative clearing rules, the Company had approximately $3.1 million in net margin collateral received from financial counterparties at December 31, 2017, comprised of $32.0 million in initial margin posted and $35.1 million in variation margin collateral received from financial counterparties or the derivative clearing organization. Collateral levels for approved financial institution counterparties are monitored daily and adjusted as necessary. In the event of default, should the collateral not be returned, the exposure would be offset by terminating the transaction.
The Company regularly evaluates the credit risk of its counterparties, taking into account the likelihood of default, net exposures, and remaining contractual life, among other related factors. The Company's net current credit exposure relating to interest rate derivatives with Webster Bank customers was $23.0 million at December 31, 2017. In addition, the Company monitors potential future exposure, representing its best estimate of exposure to remaining contractual maturity. The potential future exposure relating to interest rate derivatives with Webster Bank customers totaled $28.2 million at December 31, 2017. The credit exposures are mitigated as transactions with customers are generally secured by the same collateral of the underlying transactions being hedged.