XML 33 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.1
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

10. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments

 

Aldoxorubicin

 

We have an agreement (the “Vergell Agreement”) with Vergell Medical (formerly with KTB Tumorforschungs GmbH) (“Vergell”) for the exclusive license of patent rights held by Vergell for the worldwide development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin. Under the agreement, we had to make payments to Vergell upon meeting certain clinical and regulatory milestones up to and including the product’s second final marketing approval. However, those payments are no longer required since the intellectual property acquired under the Vergell Agreement expired. We accrued $316,000 that we believe was owed prior to the expiry of the intellectual property. This amount was outstanding at December 31, 2024, and 2023.

 

Arimoclomol

 

The agreement relating to our worldwide rights to arimoclomol provides for our payment of up to an aggregate of $3.65 million upon receipt of milestone payments from Orphayzme A/S. On May 31, 2022, Orphazyme announced that it had completed the sale of substantially all of its assets and business activities for cash consideration of $12.8 million and assumption of liabilities estimated to equal approximately $5.2 million to KemPharm (the “KemPharm Transaction”). KemPharm is a specialty biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel treatments for rare central nervous system (“CNS”) diseases. As part of the KemPharm Transaction, all of Orphazyme’s obligations to LadRx under the 2011 Arimoclomol Agreement, including with regard to milestone payments and royalties on sales, were assumed by KemPharm. KemPharm re-branded to Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. in February 2023.

 

 

As discussed in Note 7, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, although all the liabilities and obligations related to arimoclomol remain the responsibility of the Company, XOMA directed an escrow agent appointed by them to pay on behalf of LadRx $3.25 million reflected in the preceding paragraph, as well as all future obligations related to Steven A. Kriegsman, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, as amended by and between the Company and Mr. Kriegsman, dated March 26, 2019.

 

Innovive

 

Under the merger agreement by which we acquired Innovive Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Innovive”), we agreed to pay the former Innovive stockholders a total of up to approximately $18.3 million of future earnout merger consideration, subject to our achievement of specified net sales under the Innovive license agreements. As of December 31, 2024, there are no longer any further obligations due under this agreement, since the licensed intellectual property rights have expired.

 

Contractual obligations

 

LadRx’s current contractual obligations that will require future cash payments for the following Employment Agreements as follows (in thousands):

 

   

Employment

Agreements (1)

 
2025            976  
2026      
Thereafter      
Total   $ 976  

 

(1) Employment agreements include management contracts which have been revised from time to time. The employment agreements for the Company’s executive officers provide for minimum salaries, which are adjusted annually at the discretion of the Company’s Compensation Committee, and in some cases provide for minimum annual bonuses and employee benefits, as well.

 

Contingencies

 

The Company is occasionally involved in legal proceedings and other matters arising from the normal course of business. On November 30, 2022, Jerald Hammann (“Hammann”) filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) against the Company, Mr. Caloz, and Mr. Kriegsman (together, “Defendants”) in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, alleging various violations of a Cooperation Agreement, dated August 21, 2020, by and between the Company and Hammann. The Complaint alleges breaches of a provision limiting the Board’s ability to effect discretionary compensation and a non-disparagement provision. The Complaint further alleges a breach of a purported implied obligation that the Company disclose various internal records to Hammann. Defendants believe the Complaint is wholly without merit and moved to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety. As a result, the Court subsequently dismissed the claims against Mr. Caloz and Mr. Kriegsman and also dismissed one of the claims against the Company. The Company intends to litigate vigorously against Hammann’s claims.

 

The Company intends to vigorously defend against any complaint. We have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which will be utilized, after the deductible, in the defense of any matter involving our directors or officers.

 

The Company evaluates developments in legal proceedings and other matters on a quarterly basis. If an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable, we could incur charges that could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations for the period in which the outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.