XML 57 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Operating Leases

 

The Company leases certain real estate, office space, and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through 2014 and which contain various renewal and escalation clauses.  Rent expense amounted to approximately $8,656, $7,700 and $6,943 for years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2012, minimum rental payments under these leases were as follows:

 

2013

 

$

5,144

 

2014

 

2,905

 

2015

 

1,790

 

2016

 

545

 

2017

 

193

 

Total

 

$

10,577

 

 

Notes Payable

 

The Company has three acquisition-related, unsecured notes payable totaling $1.1 million bearing interest at 6% per annum.  At December 31, 2012, future principal payments on the notes payable were $500, $125, and $500 in April 2013, November 2103, and April 2014, respectively.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is currently, and from time to time, subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of its business, including claims for damages for personal injuries.  In the opinion of management, after discussions with legal counsel, the ultimate resolution of any of these ordinary course pending claims and legal proceedings will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

As previously disclosed, four derivative complaints were filed in Jefferson Circuit Court, Kentucky, against the members of the Company’s board of directors and chief financial officer. All four lawsuits named the Company as a nominal defendant and were consolidated into a single action.  All of the complaints and the resulting consolidated complaint refer to an April 27, 2010 The Wall Street Journal article and the subsequent governmental investigations.  On February 13, 2012, the independent directors filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which was later joined by the counsel of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer.  On October 2, 2012, the Court entered an order granting the motion to dismiss and dismissing the complaint with prejudice.  On November 1, 2012 the plaintiffs filed an appeal of the Court’s ruling with the Kentucky Court of Appeals.

 

As previously disclosed, a fifth derivative complaint involving Richard W. Carey was filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.  The lawsuit names the Company as a nominal defendant and is substantially duplicative of the derivative complaint pending in the Jefferson Circuit Court.  The Court granted the defendants’ motion to stay the lawsuit pending further order of the Court.

 

The Company is unable to assess the probable outcome or potential liability, if any, arising from these matters.