-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, QJWW5FgthozwtDB5MzE1X9RXsJg0tjqjBGdd/6b4JSDQLB1vphd19fxE7DDctepL 3mjHixt4AVmpFWhPYmvyNg== 0000798905-96-000001.txt : 19960401 0000798905-96-000001.hdr.sgml : 19960401 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000798905-96-000001 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19951231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19960329 SROS: NONE FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000798905 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-COMPUTER RENTAL & LEASING [7377] IRS NUMBER: 680032426 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-15287 FILM NUMBER: 96540477 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2401 KERNER BLVD CITY: SAN RAFAEL STATE: CA ZIP: 94901 BUSINESS PHONE: 4154854500 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 2: 2401 KERNER BLVD CITY: SAN RAFAEL STATE: CA ZIP: 94901 10-K 1 12/31/95 10K Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K __X__ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED) For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 Commission File Number 0-15287 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) California 68-0032426 - ------------------------------- ------------------------------------ (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 2401 Kerner Boulevard, San Rafael, California 94901-5527 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (415) 485-4500 -------------- Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Units of Limited Partnership Interest Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ----- Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ___ No _X_ As of December 31, 1995, 379,583 Units of Limited Partnership interest were outstanding. No market exists for the Units of Partnership interest and therefore there exists no aggregate market value at December 31, 1995. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE Page 2 of 31 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II 1995 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I Item 1. Business................................................. 3 Item 2. Properties............................................... 5 Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................ 6 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders...... 6 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Securities and Related Security Holder Matters.................................. 6 Item 6. Selected Financial Data.................................. 6 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations...................... 7 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.............. 9 Item 9. Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Matters.................................................. 26 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant....... 26 Item 11. Executive Compensation................................... 27 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management............................................... 27 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions........... 28 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K................................................. 28 Signatures ............................................................... 30 Page 3 of 31 PART I Item 1. Business. General Development of Business. Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund II, a California limited partnership (the "Partnership"), was organized on June 28, 1984. The Partnership was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with an effective date of November 20, 1986 and shall continue to operate until its termination date unless dissolved sooner due to the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Partnership or a vote of the Limited Partners. The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 1997. The General Partner is Phoenix Leasing Incorporated, a California corporation. The General Partner or its affiliates also is or has been a general partner in several other limited partnerships formed to invest in capital equipment and other assets. The initial registration was for 300,000 units of limited partnership interest at a price of $250 per unit with an option of increasing the public offering up to a maximum of 400,000 units. The Partnership sold 386,308 units for a total capitalization of $96,577,000. Of the proceeds received through the offering, the Partnership has incurred $11,540,000 in organizational and offering expenses. The Partnership concluded its public offering on February 4, 1988. Phoenix Concept Cablevision Inc. (the "Subsidiary") is a majority owned subsidiary of the Partnership (hereinafter, both entities are collectively referred to as the "Consolidated Partnership"). The Subsidiary was formed under the laws of Nevada on December 22, 1992. The Partnership owns approximately 58% of the outstanding shares of Phoenix Concept Cablevision Inc. Phoenix Concept Cablevision Inc. owns 100% of the outstanding shares of Concept Cablevision of South Carolina, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Concept Cablevision of South Carolina, Inc. owns and operates a cable television system located in the state of South Carolina. Narrative Description of Business. The Consolidated Partnership conducts its business in two business segments: Equipment Leasing and Financing Operations, and Cable Television System Operations. A discussion of these two segments follows: Equipment Leasing and Financing Operations. From the initial formation of the Partnership through December 31, 1995, the total investments in equipment leases and financing transactions (loans), including the Partnership's pro rata interest in investments made by joint ventures, approximate $175,590,000. The average initial firm term of contractual payments from equipment subject to lease was 32.19 months, and the average initial net monthly payment rate as a percentage of the original purchase price was 2.24%. The average initial firm term of contractual payments from loans was 82.01 months. The Partnership's principal objective is to produce cash flow to the investors on a continuing basis over the life of the Partnership. To achieve this objective, the Partnership has invested in various types of capital equipment and other assets to provide leasing or financing of the same to third parties, including Fortune 1000 companies and their subsidiaries, middle-market companies, emerging growth companies, cable television operators and others, on either a long-term or short-term basis. The types of equipment that the Partnership has invested in includes computer peripherals, terminal systems, small computer systems, communications equipment, IBM mainframes, IBM-software compatible mainframes, office systems, CAE/CAD/CAM equipment, telecommunications equipment, cable television equipment, medical equipment, production and manufacturing equipment and software products. The Partnership has made secured loans to cable television systems, emerging growth companies, security monitoring companies and other businesses. These loans are asset-based and the Partnership receives a security interest in the assets financed. The Partnership's financing activities have been concentrated in the cable television industry. The Partnership has made secured loans (notes receivable) to operators of cable television systems for the acquisition, refinancing, construction, upgrade and extension of such systems located throughout the United States. The loans to cable television system operators are secured by a senior or subordinated interest in the assets of the cable television system, its franchise agreements, subscriber lists, material contracts and other related assets. In some cases the Partnership has also received personal guarantees from the owners of the systems. At December 31, 1995, the Partnership's remaining investments in notes receivable consist of a note receivable from one cable television system operator and a note receivable from a security monitoring company. The Partnership's net investment in notes receivable before consideration of the allowance for losses on notes receivable Page 4 of 31 approximates 28% of the total assets of the Partnership at December 31, 1995. Several of the cable television system operators the Partnership provided financing to have experienced financial difficulties. These difficulties are believed to have been caused by several factors such as: a significant reduction in the availability of debt from banks and other financial institutions to finance acquisitions and operations, uncertainties related to future government regulation in the cable television industry and the economic recession in the United States. These factors have resulted in a significant decline in the demand for the acquisition of cable systems and have further caused an overall decrease in the value of many cable television systems. As a result of the above, many of the Partnership's notes receivable from cable television system operators have gone into default. The result is that the Partnership has not received scheduled payments, has had to grant loan extensions, has experienced an increase in legal and collection costs and in some cases, has had to foreclose on the cable television system. The impact of this has been a decrease in the overall return on the Partnership's investments in such notes. The Partnership has acquired equipment pursuant to either "Operating" leases or "Financing" leases. At December 31, 1995 approximately 71% of the equipment owned by the Partnership was classified as Financing leases. The Partnership has also provided financing secured by assets in the form of notes receivable. Operating leases are generally short-term leases under which the lessor will receive aggregate rental payments in an amount that is less than the purchase price of the equipment. Financing leases are generally for a longer term under which the non-cancelable rental payments due during the initial term of the lease are at least sufficient to recover the purchase price of the equipment. Competition. The General Partner has concentrated the Partnership's activities in the equipment leasing and financing industry, an area in which the General Partner has developed an expertise. The computer equipment leasing industry is extremely competitive. The Partnership competes with many well established companies having substantially greater financial resources. Competitive factors include pricing, technological innovation and methods of financing (including use of various short-term and long-term financing plans, as well as the outright purchase of equipment). Generally, the impact of these factors to the Partnership would be the realization of increased equipment remarketing and storage costs, as well as lower residuals received from the sale or remarketing of such equipment. Cable Television System Operations. Phoenix Concept Cablevision, Inc. (the "Subsidiary") is a majority owned subsidiary of the Partnership. The Subsidiary was acquired through foreclosure of a defaulted note receivable to the Partnership on September 15, 1994. The net carrying value of the Partnership's share of this defaulted note receivable was approximately $1,620,000, which was exchanged for an 81.22% ownership interest in this joint venture. The Partnership owns approximately 58% of the outstanding shares of Phoenix Concept Cablevision, Inc. Phoenix Concept Cablevision, Inc. owns 100% of the outstanding shares of Concept Cablevision of South Carolina, Inc., which owns and operates a cable television system. Phoenix Cable Management Inc. (PCMI), an affiliate of the General Partner, provides day to day management services in connection with the operation of the system. Concept Cablevision of South Carolina, Inc. owns and operates a cable television system located in the state of South Carolina, which currently consists of two headend locations and 81 miles of plant passing approximately 3,710 homes and has approximately 1,966 cable subscribers at December 31, 1995. The cable television system serves the communities of Holly Hill, St. George, Reevesville, Eutawville, certain unincorporated areas in Dorchester County and other communities in Orangeburg County. The cable system operates under six non-exclusive franchise agreements with each of the stated municipalities. These cable franchise agreements expire between the years 1996 and 2003. Cable television systems receive signals transmitted by nearby radio and television broadcast stations, microwave relay systems and communications satellites and distribute the signals to subscribers via coaxial cable. The subscribers pay a monthly fee to the cable television system for such services. Cable television companies operate under a non-exclusive franchise agreement granted by each local government authority. As part of the franchise agreement, the franchisee typically pays a portion of the gross revenues of the system to the local government. The Partnership intends to own and operate the cable system until market conditions would enable a sale at acceptable terms. Any excess cash generated from operations of the cable system will be used for upgrades and improvements to the system in order to maximize the value of the system. Competition. The Partnership's cable operations competes with numerous other companies with far greater financial resources. In addition, cable television franchises are typically non-exclusive and the Partnership could be Page 5 of 31 directly competing with other cable television systems. Cable television also competes with conventional over-the-air broadcast television and direct broadcast satellite transmission. Future technological developments may also provide additional competitive factors. The newly passed Telecommunications Bill allows telephone companies to enter into the cable television business and vice-versa. Large cable television systems that have upgraded their systems with fiber and two way capabilities may find themselves getting a piece of the much larger telephone revenue. For the smaller rural cable systems, such as those owned by the Partnership or through investments in joint ventures, it is unlikely that the Partnership will enter into telephone services nor will the telephone companies try to seek our customers in the near future. The systems owned by the Partnership are too small and not dense enough to pay for the large amount of capital expenditures needed for these services. A favorable part of the bill is that small cable systems will be immediately deregulated from most regulations and that the definition of a small cable operator is under 600,000 subscribers. This will allow small operators to raise rates if needed, and eliminate the need to provide franchise authorities with costly rate filings and justifications. The new bill also allows the local telephone companies to buy out small cable operators in their own region as well as to joint venture with small cable operators. During 1995, the General Partner has observed a renewed market interest in small cable systems. The final impact of the newly passed Telecommunications Bill will not be known fully until a technical rewrite is completed and all the legal challenges have been made. Please see Note 15 in the Partnership's financial statements for financial information about the Partnership's business segments. Other. A brief description of the type of assets in which the Partnership has invested as of December 31, 1995, together with information concerning the uses of assets is set forth in Item 2. Item 2. Properties. The Partnership is engaged in the equipment leasing and financing industry. The primary assets held by the Partnership are its investments in leases and loans either directly or through its investment in joint ventures. As of December 31, 1995, the Partnership owns equipment and has outstanding loans to borrowers with an aggregate original cost of $10,240,000. The equipment and loans have been made to customers located throughout the United States. The following table summarizes the type of equipment owned or financed by the Partnership, including its pro rata interest in joint ventures, at December 31, 1995. Percentage of Asset Types Purchase Price(1) Total Assets ----------- ----------------- ------------- (Amounts in Thousands) Computer Peripherals $ 4,046 40% Reproduction Equipment 2,840 28 Financing Related to Cable Television Systems 1,350 13 Telecommunications 1,153 11 Mainframes 525 5 Capital Equipment Leased to Emerging Growth Companies 250 2 Financing of Security Monitoring System Companies 57 1 Small Computer Systems 19 -- ------- --- TOTAL $10,240 100% ======= === (1) These amounts include the Partnership's pro rata interest in equipment joint ventures of $1,683,000, cost of equipment on financing leases of $1,382,000 and original cost of outstanding loans of $1,406,000 at December 31, 1995 Page 6 of 31 Cable Television System Operations. The Subsidiary's principal plants and real property consist of electronic headend equipment, its plant (cable) and two parcels of land. The Subsidiary's headends are located on the two parcels of land. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. The Registrant is not a party to any pending legal proceedings which would have a material adverse impact on its financial position. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. No matters were submitted to a vote of Limited Partners, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the year covered by this report. Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Securities and Related Security Holder Matters. (a) The Registrant's limited partnership interests are not publicly traded. There is no market for the Registrant's limited partnership interests and it is unlikely that any will develop. (b) Approximate number of equity security investments: Number of Unit Holders Title of Class as of December 31, 1995 -------------- ----------------------- Limited Partners 9,109 PART II Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Amounts in Thousands Except for Per Unit Amounts ------------------------------------------------ 1995 1994(1) 1993 1992 1991 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Total Income $ 2,868 $ 5,095 $ 5,613 $ 10,706 $ 14,290 Net Income (Loss) 1,164 2,925 1,570 (1,540) (5,429) Total Assets 6,150 6,338 6,922 10,168 24,728 Distributions to Partners 949 3,796 3,794 14,269 14,623 Net Income (Loss) per Limited Partnership Unit 3.04 7.63 4.09 (4.01) (14.09) Distributions per Limited Partnership Unit 2.50 10.00 9.99 37.54 36.89
(1) Commencing in 1994, the amounts reflect the consolidated activity of the Partnership and its subsidiary. The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. Page 7 of 31 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Results of Operations Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund II and Subsidiary (the Partnership) reported net income of $1,164,000 during the year ended December 31, 1995, as compared to net income of $2,925,000 and $1,570,000 during 1994 and 1993, respectively. The decrease in net income during 1995, as compared to 1994, is due to a decrease in rental income and the absence of a settlement. The improvement in earnings during 1994 is primarily due to a settlement of $1,180,000 received by the Partnership during 1994. Total revenues declined by $2,227,000 during 1995, as compared to a decline of $418,000 during 1994, when compared to the previous year. The decline in total revenues during 1995, as compared to 1994, is due to a decrease in rental income of $1,491,000 and the absence of a settlement. The decrease in rental income for both 1995 and 1994 is a result of a decrease in the amount of equipment owned by the Partnership. At December 31, 1995, the Partnership owned equipment with an aggregate original cost of $7.2 million, as compared to $16.6 million at December 31, 1994. As the Partnership continues to sell equipment upon expiration of the lease terms, it is anticipated that the equipment portfolio and rental income will continue to decrease. Additionally, the Partnership reported a decreased gain on the sale of equipment of $378,000 and $629,000 during 1995 and 1994, respectively, due to a decrease in the market value of equipment sold. Partially offsetting these decreases was a settlement received by the Partnership during 1994 (see Note 9). Total expenses decreased by $484,000 during 1995, when compared to 1994, due primarily to a decrease of $456,000 in lease related operating expenses. The decrease in total expense of $1,797,000 during 1994, when compared to 1993, was due primarily to the decrease in depreciation and amortization of $1,536,000. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was attributable to the decrease in the size of the equipment portfolio due to the sale of equipment and a large portion of the equipment having been fully depreciated. The Partnership sold equipment with an aggregate original cost of $9,521,000, $22,547,000 and $18,149,000 during the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The decrease in lease related operating expenses during 1995 and 1994 was due to a decrease in maintenance, remarketing and refurbishing expenses incurred on a portion of the Partnership's reproduction equipment purchased pursuant to a vendor lease and remarketing agreement. In accordance with the agreement, these expenses are deducted from the rents and sales proceeds received from such leases and decrease along with the decrease in rental income. Inflation affects the Partnership in relation to the current cost of equipment placed on lease and the residual values realized when the equipment comes off lease and is sold. During the last several years inflation has been low, thereby having very little impact upon the Partnership. Cable Television System Operations The Partnership owns a majority interest in a cable television system that it received through the foreclosure on a defaulted note receivable on September 15, 1994. Only the results of operations since September 15, 1994 are included in the consolidated results of operations of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 1994. As a result, this cable television system did not generate significant revenues during 1994. During 1995, the Partnership reported cable subscriber revenues of $589,000 and total expenses of $590,000 from this cable television system. Joint Ventures The Partnership's increased earnings from its investment in joint ventures during 1995, as compared to 1994, is due to a full year of earnings from the Partnership's investment in a new equipment leasing joint venture that was formed on October 28, 1994. There were no significant earnings from this joint venture during 1994. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Partnership's primary source of liquidity comes from equipment leasing and financing activities. The Partnership has contractual obligations with a diversified group of lessees for fixed lease terms at fixed rental amounts and will also receive payments on its outstanding notes receivable. The Partnership's future liquidity is dependent upon its receiving payment of such contractual obligations. As the initial lease terms expire, the Partnership will Page 8 of 31 continue to renew, remarket or sell the equipment. The future liquidity in excess of the remaining contractual obligations will depend upon the General Partner's success in re-leasing and selling the Partnership's equipment as it comes off lease. The net cash generated by equipment leasing and financing activities was $1,581,000, $2,052,000 and $2,647,000 during 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The net cash generated by equipment leasing and financing activities continues to decline for the same reasons as the decrease in rental income as previously discussed. Proceeds from the sale of equipment decreased due to a decrease in the market value of equipment sold. The Partnership owns equipment being held for lease with an aggregate original cost of $2,078,000, $3,650,000 and $13,484,000, and a net book value of $0, $36,000 and $40,000 at December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The General Partner is actively engaged, on behalf of the Partnership, in remarketing and selling the Partnership's off-lease equipment portfolio. The cash distributed to partners for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 were $949,000, $3,796,000 and $3,794,000, respectively. In accordance with the Limited Partnership Agreement, the limited partners are entitled to 95% of the cash available for distribution and the General Partner is entitled to 5%. The limited partners received distributions of $949,000, $3,796,000 and $3,794,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The cumulative distributions to Limited Partners are $79,964,000, $79,015,000 and $75,219,000 at December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The General Partner did not receive payment for its share of cash distributions for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. In accordance with the partnership agreement, upon termination of the Partnership, the General Partner is required to restore any deficit balance in its capital account. During 1992, the General Partner elected to make an early contribution for such deficit capital balance and is no longer receiving payment for its share of the cash available for distribution. The Partnership's asset portfolio continues to decline as a result of the ongoing liquidation of assets, and therefore it is expected that the cash generated from operations will also decline. As the cash generated by Partnership operations continues to decline, the rate of cash distributions made to limited partners will also decline. During 1993, the Partnership reduced the cash distributions to partners due to such decline in the cash available for distribution. The Partnership's quarterly distribution to partners in January of 1996 was at the same rate as the distributions made during 1995. After the January 1996 distribution, the Partnership will switch to an annual distribution with the first annual distribution to be made on January 15, 1997. The Partnership has been adversely impacted by several factors that have resulted in returns and recovery of investment in lower than anticipated amounts. The factors impacting the Partnership have been the economic recession in the United States, the rate of obsolescence of computer equipment, the market demand and remarketability for equipment owned by the Partnership, aggressive manufacturer sales practices and a general unavailability of debt to companies. All of these factors have resulted in the decline in revenues and the reduced distributions to partners. Cash generated from leasing and financing operations has been and is anticipated to continue to be sufficient to meet the Partnership's ongoing operational expenses and debt service. Page 9 of 31 Item 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II AND SUBSIDIARY YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 Page 10 of 31 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Partners Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund II We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund II (a California limited partnership) and Subsidiary listed in the accompanying index to financial statements (Item 14(a)). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and the schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedule are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index to financial statements (Item 14(a)) present fairly, in all material respects the consolidated financial position of Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund II and Subsidiary at December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. ERNST & YOUNG LLP San Francisco, California January 19, 1996 Page 11 of 31 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Amounts in Thousands Except for Unit Amounts)
December 31, 1995 1994 ---- ---- ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,951 $ 200 Accounts receivable (net of allowance for losses on accounts receivable of $67 and $83 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively) 110 209 Notes receivable (net of allowance for losses on notes receivable of $358 and $368 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively) 1,390 2,039 Equipment on operating leases and held for lease (net of accumulated depreciation of $5,061 and $13,441 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively) 99 292 Net investment in financing leases 248 564 Investment in joint ventures 995 1,488 Cable systems, property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $640 and $469 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively) 997 1,085 Deferred income tax asset 118 142 Other assets 242 319 --------- --------- Total Assets $ 6,150 $ 6,338 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 584 $ 985 Minority interest in subsidiary 541 569 --------- --------- Total Liabilities 1,125 1,554 --------- --------- Partners' Capital: General Partner 104 92 Limited Partners, 400,000 units authorized, 386,308 units issued and 379,583 units outstanding at December 31, 1995 and 1994 4,895 4,692 Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities 26 - --------- --------- Total Partners' Capital 5,025 4,784 --------- --------- Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital $ 6,150 $ 6,338 ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 12 of 31 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Amounts in Thousands Except for Per Unit Amounts)
For the Years Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 ---- ---- ---- INCOME Rental income $ 842 $ 2,333 $ 3,779 Gain on sale of equipment 443 821 1,450 Equity in earnings (losses) from joint ventures 342 6 (100) Interest income, notes receivable 580 300 294 Gain on sale of securities - 203 - Cable subscriber revenue 589 198 - Settlement - 1,180 - Other income 72 54 90 --------- -------- ---------- Total Income 2,868 5,095 5,513 --------- -------- ---------- EXPENSES Depreciation and amortization 488 474 2,010 Lease related operating expenses 346 802 1,081 Program services, cable systems 180 72 - Management fees to General Partner and affiliate 125 161 230 Provision for losses on receivables 10 2 111 Legal expense 156 284 161 Reimbursed administrative costs to General Partner 162 147 139 General and administrative expenses 195 204 211 --------- -------- ---------- Total Expenses 1,662 2,146 3,943 --------- -------- ---------- NET INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES $ 1,206 $ 2,949 $ 1,570 Minority interest in earnings of subsidiary (3) (5) - Income tax expense (39) (19) - --------- -------- ---------- NET INCOME $ 1,164 $ 2,925 $ 1,570 ========= ======== ========== NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT $ 3.04 $ 7.63 $ 4.09 ========= ======== ========== ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME: General Partner $ 12 $ 29 $ 16 Limited Partners 1,152 2,896 1,554 --------- -------- ---------- $ 1,164 $ 2,925 $ 1,570 ========= ======== ========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 13 of 31 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL (Amounts in Thousands Except for Unit Amounts)
General Partner's Limited Partners' Unrealized Total Amount Units Amount Gains Amount --------- --------------------- ---------- ------ Balance, December 31, 1992 $ 47 379,583 $ 7,832 $ - $ 7,879 Distributions to partners ($9.99 per limited partnership unit) - - (3,794) - (3,794) Net income 16 - 1,554 - 1,570 -------- --------- ---------- ------- ---------- Balance, December 31, 1993 63 379,583 5,592 - 5,655 Distributions to partners ($10.00 per limited partnership unit) - - (3,796) - (3,796) Net income 29 - 2,896 - 2,925 -------- --------- ---------- ------- ---------- Balance, December 31, 1994 92 379,583 4,692 - 4,784 Distributions to partners ($2.50 per limited partnership unit) - - (949) - (949) Change for the year in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities - - - 26 26 Net income 12 - 1,152 - 1,164 -------- --------- ---------- ------- ---------- Balance, December 31, 1995 $ 104 379,583 $ 4,895 $ 26 $ 5,025 ======== ========= ========== ======= ========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 14 of 31 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Amounts in Thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 ---- ---- ---- Operating Activities: Net income $ 1,164 $ 2,925 $ 1,570 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 488 474 2,010 Gain on sale of equipment (443) (821) (1,450) Equity in losses (earnings) from joint ventures (342) (6) 100 Minority interest in earnings of subsidiary 3 5 -- Provision for early termination, financing leases -- -- (4) Provision for (recovery of) losses on notes receivable (7) -- 115 Provision for losses on accounts receivable 17 2 -- Gain on sale of securities (15) (203) -- Decrease in accounts receivable 82 90 321 Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses (391) (157) (729) Decrease in other assets 29 -- 38 Settlement -- (711) -- Decrease in deferred income tax asset 24 18 -- Other -- 12 -- ------- ------- ------- Net cash provided by operating activities 609 1,628 1,971 ------- ------- ------- Investing Activities: Principal payments, financing leases 316 385 519 Principal payments, notes receivable 656 39 157 Proceeds from sale of equipment 428 968 1,857 Proceeds from sale of securities 15 245 -- Distributions from joint ventures 835 -- 356 Purchase of equipment (32) (813) (7) Investment in financing leases -- -- (185) Investment in notes receivable -- (106) -- Investment in joint ventures -- (34) -- Investment in securities -- (42) -- Cable systems, property and equipment (86) (128) -- Payment of acquisition fees (1) (4) (10) ------- ------- ------- Net cash provided by investing activities 2,131 510 2,687 ------- ------- ------- Financing Activities: Payments of principal, notes payable (9) (174) (291) Distributions to minority partners (31) -- -- Distributions to partners (949) (3,796) (3,794) ------- ------- ------- Net cash used by financing activities (989) (3,970) (4,085) ------- ------- ------- Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,751 (1,832) 573 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 200 2,032 1,459 ------- ------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 1,951 $ 200 $ 2,032 ======= ======= ======= Supplemental Cash Flow Information: Cash paid for interest expense $ -- $ 3 $ 18 Cash paid for income taxes $ 16 $ 3 $ 5 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 15 of 31 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1995 Note 1. Organization and Partnership Matters. Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund II, a California limited partnership (the "Partnership"), was formed on June 28, 1984, to invest in capital equipment of various types and to lease such equipment to third parties on either a long-term or short-term basis, and to provide financing to emerging growth companies and cable television system operators. The Partnership's minimum investment requirements were met November 24, 1986. The Partnership's termination date is December 31, 1997. On September 15, 1994, the Partnership, along with three other affiliated partnerships (collectively "the Partnerships"), entered into a settlement agreement with a borrower to transfer ownership of all of the outstanding stock in a cable television system company to a corporation owned by the partnerships in full satisfaction of a defaulted note receivable to the partnerships. As a result of this settlement agreement, Concept Cablevision of South Carolina, Inc. transferred 100% of the outstanding stock to Phoenix Concept Cablevision, Inc., a majority owned (58%) subsidiary of the Partnership. The net carrying value of the defaulted note, including other capitalized costs, to the Partnership at the settlement date was approximately $769,000 and was carried over (from in-substance foreclosed cable systems) to the basis in the cable system. Phoenix Concept Cablevision, Inc. (the Subsidiary) was formed under the laws of Nevada on December 22, 1992 (hereinafter, the Partnership and the Subsidiary are collectively referred to as the Consolidated Partnership). The acquisition of Concept Cablevision of South Carolina Inc. by the Subsidiary through foreclosure was accounted for using the "purchase method" of accounting in which the transfer price was allocated in accordance with the relative fair market value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. For financial reporting purposes, Partnership income shall be allocated as follows: (a) first, to the General Partner until the cumulative income so allocated is equal to the cumulative distributions to the General Partner, (b) second, before redemption fees, 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners until the cumulative income so allocated is equal to any cumulative Partnership loss and syndication expenses for the current and all prior accounting periods, and (c) the balance, if any, to the Unit Holders. All Partnership losses shall be allocated, before redemption fees, 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the Unit Holders. The General Partner is entitled to receive 5% of all cash distributions until the Limited Partners have recovered their initial capital contributions plus a cumulative return of 12% per annum. Thereafter, the General Partner will receive 15% of all cash distributions. In the event the General Partner has a deficit balance in its capital account at the time of partnership liquidation, it will be required to contribute the amount of such deficit to the Partnership. During the year ended December 31, 1992, the General Partner elected to make an early contribution of $1,404,000, and the $189,000 in accrued distributions to the General Partner at December 31, 1991 was reversed. In addition, the General Partner did not draw its share of the 1994, 1993 and 1992 cash available for distribution. As compensation for management services, the General Partner receives a fee payable quarterly, in an amount equal to 3.5%, subject to certain limitations, of the Partnership's gross revenues for the quarter from which such payment is being made, which revenues shall include, but are not limited to, rental receipts, maintenance fees, proceeds from the sale of equipment and interest income. Phoenix Cable Management Inc. (PCMI), an affiliate of the General Partner, provides day to day management services in connection with the operation of the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary will pay a management fee equal to four and one-half percent of the System's monthly gross revenue for these services. Revenues subject to a management fee at the Subsidiary level are not subject to management fees at the Partnership level. The General Partner will be compensated for services performed in connection with the analysis of assets available to the Partnership, the selection of such assets and the acquisition thereof, including obtaining lessees for the equipment and negotiating and concluding master lease agreements with certain lessees. As compensation for such acquisition services, the General Partner will receive a fee equal to 4%, subject to certain limitations, of (a) the purchase price of equipment acquired by the Partnership, or equipment leased to customers by manufacturers, the financing for which is provided by the Partnership, or (b) financing provided to businesses such as cable operators, emerging growth companies, or security monitoring system companies, payable upon such acquisition or financing, as the case may be. Acquisition fees are amortized over the life of the assets principally on a straight-line basis. Page 16 of 31 Phoenix Securities, Inc., an affiliate of the General Partner, has contracted with or employs certain persons who have performed wholesaling activities in connection with the offering of the units through broker-dealers. Schedule of compensation paid and distributions made to the General Partner and affiliate for the years ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 ---- ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Management fees $125 $161 $230 Acquisition fees 1 4 8 ---- ---- ---- $126 $165 $238 ==== ==== ==== Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Partnership, and its majority owned subsidiary, Phoenix Concept Cablevision Inc., a Nevada corporation, since the date of acquisition, September 15, 1994. The Partnership owns approximately 58% of the outstanding shares of Phoenix Concept Cablevision Inc. Phoenix Concept Cablevision Inc. owns 100% of the outstanding shares of Concept Cablevision of South Carolina, Inc., a Delaware corporation. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation. Leasing Operations. The Partnership's leasing operations consist of both financing and operating leases. The financing method of accounting for leases records as unearned income at the inception of the lease, the excess of net rentals receivable and estimated residual value at the end of the lease term, over the cost of equipment leased. Unearned income is credited to income monthly over the term of the lease on a declining basis to provide an approximate level rate of return on the unrecovered cost of the investment. Initial direct costs of consummating new leases are capitalized and included in the cost of equipment. Under the operating method of accounting for leases, the leased equipment is recorded as an asset at cost and depreciated. The Partnership's leased equipment is depreciated primarily on an accelerated depreciation method over the estimated useful life of six years, except for equipment leased under vendor agreements, which is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life, ranging up to six years. The Partnership's policy is to review periodically the expected economic life of its rental equipment in order to determine the probability of recovering its undepreciated cost. Such reviews address, among other things, recent and anticipated technological developments affecting computer equipment and competitive factors within the computer marketplace. Although remarketing rental rates are expected to decline in the future with respect to some of the Partnership's rental equipment, such rentals are expected to exceed projected expenses and depreciation. Where reviews of the equipment portfolio indicate that rentals plus anticipated sales proceeds will not exceed expenses in any future period, the Partnership revises its depreciation policy and accelerates depreciation as appropriate. Rental income for the year is determined on the basis of rental payments due for the period under the terms of the lease. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals of the leased equipment are charged to expense. Cable Television System Operations. The consolidated statement of operations includes the operating activity of the Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for the period from the date of acquisition (September 15, 1994) to December 31, 1994. The Subsidiary owns and operates a cable television system located in the state of South Carolina, which currently consists of two headend locations and 81 miles of plant passing approximately 3,710 homes and has approximately 1,966 cable subscribers at December 31, 1995. The cable television system serves the communities of Holly Hill, St. George, Reevesville, Eutawville, certain unincorporated areas in Dorchester County and other communities in Orangeburg County. The cable system operates under six non-exclusive franchise agreements with each of the stated municipalities. These cable franchise agreements expire between the years 1996 and 2003. Property, cable systems and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated service lives ranging from five to ten years. Replacements, renewals and improvements are capitalized and maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs assigned to intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over estimated lives of eight years. Page 17 of 31 Cable television services are billed monthly in advance. Revenue is deferred and recognized as the services are provided. Investments in Joint Ventures. Minority investments in net assets of the equipment joint ventures reflect the Consolidated Partnership's equity basis in the ventures. Under the equity method of accounting, the original investment is recorded at cost and is adjusted periodically to recognize the Consolidated Partnership's share of earnings, losses, cash contributions and cash distributions after the date of acquisition. Investment in Marketable Securities Available for Sale. The Partnership has investments in stock warrants in public companies. The Partnership has classified its investments in stock warrants as available-for-sale in accordance with FASB Statement No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Available-for-sale securities are stated at their fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of partners' capital. The stock warrants held by the Partnership were granted by certain lessees or borrowers as additional compensation for leasing or financing equipment. At the date of grant, such warrants were determined to have no fair market value and were recorded at their historical cost of $0. Notes Receivable. Notes receivable generally are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, which includes accrued interest. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Impaired Notes Receivable. Generally, notes receivable are classified as impaired and the accrual of interest on such notes are discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectibility of the contractual payments, even though the loan may currently be performing. When a note receivable is classified as impaired, income recognition is discontinued. Any payments received subsequent to the placement of the note receivable on to impaired status will generally be applied towards the reduction of the outstanding note receivable balance, which may include previously accrued interest as well as principal. Once the principal and accrued interest balance has been reduced to zero, the remaining payments will be applied to interest income. Generally, notes receivable are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Allowance for Losses. An allowance for losses is established through provisions for losses charged against income. Notes receivable deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Non Cash Investing Activities. During the year ended December 31, 1994, the Partnership contributed equipment and other investments received through a settlement to a joint venture. The amount of such contribution was $1,430,000. The Partnership also foreclosed upon a cable television company in 1994 as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Financial Accounting Pronouncements. In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of," which requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In performing the review for recoverability, the entity would estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles that an entity expects to hold and use should be based on the fair value of the asset. Statement No. 121 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. The Partnership does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations. The Partnership plans to adopt Statement No. 121 on January 1, 1996. On January 1, 1995, the Partnership adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," and Statement No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan - - Income Recognition and Disclosures." Statement No. 114 requires that certain impaired loans be measured based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate; or, alternatively, at the loan's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Prior to 1995, the allowance for losses on notes receivable was based on the undiscounted cash flows or the fair value of the Page 18 of 31 collateral dependent loans. The adoption of this statement had no impact on the overall allowance for credit losses and did not effect the Partnership's charge offs or income recognition policies. In accordance with Statement No. 114, a loan is classified as in-substance foreclosure when the Company has taken possession of the collateral regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings take place. Notes receivable previously classified as in-substance foreclosed cable systems but for which the Company had not taken possession of the collateral have been reclassified to notes receivable. Reclassification. Certain 1994 and 1993 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1995 presentation. Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include deposits at banks, investments in money market funds and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of less than 90 days. The Partnership places its cash deposits in temporary cash investments with credit worthy, high quality financial institutions. The concentration of such cash deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Partnership. Credit and Collateral. The Partnership's activities have been concentrated in the equipment leasing and financing industry. A credit evaluation is performed by the General Partner for all leases and loans made, with the collateral requirements determined on a case-by-case basis. The Partnership's loans are generally secured by the equipment or assets financed and, in some cases, other collateral of the borrower. In the event of default, the Partnership has the right to foreclose upon the collateral used to secure such loans. Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Note 3. Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable consist of the following at December 31: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Lease payments $ 119 $ 182 Cable system service 54 64 Property taxes -- 35 Other 4 11 ----- ----- 177 292 Less: allowance for losses on accounts receivable (67) (83) ----- ----- Total $ 110 $ 209 ===== ===== Note 4. Notes Receivable. Notes receivable consist of the following at December 31:
1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Note receivable from a cable television system operator with stated interest of 19% per annum, receivable in installments of 108 months, collateralized by a security interest in the cable system assets. This note has a graduated repayment schedule followed by a balloon payment. $ 1,713 $ 2,365 Page 19 of 31 Note receivable from a security monitoring company with stated interest at 16% per annum, with payments to be taken out of the monthly payments received from assigned contracts, collateralized by all assets of the borrower. At the end of 48 months, the remaining balance, if any, is due and payable. 35 42 ------- ------- 1,748 2,407 Less: allowance for losses on notes receivable (358) (368) ------- -------- Total $ 1,390 $ 2,039 ======== =======
The Partnership's note receivable to a cable television system operator provides a payment rate in an amount that is less than the contractual interest rate. The difference between the payment rate and the contractual interest rate is added to the principal and therefore deferred until the maturity date of the note. Upon maturity of the note, the original principal and deferred interest is due and payable in full. Although the contractual interest rates may be higher, the amount of interest being recognized on the Partnership's outstanding notes receivable to cable television system operators is being limited to the amount of the payments received, thereby deferring the recognition of a portion of the deferred interest until the loan is paid off. At December 31, 1995, the recorded investment in notes that are considered to be impaired under Statement 114 was $36,000 for which the related allowance for losses is $23,000. The average recorded investment in impaired loans during the year ended December 31, 1995 was approximately $89,000. The Partnership recognized interest income of $73,000 on impaired notes during the year ended December 31, 1995. The Partnership received a settlement on one of its notes receivable during the year ended December 31, 1995. This note receivable was from a cable television operator which was impaired. The Partnership received $140,000 as a settlement for this note receivable of which $68,000 was applied towards the outstanding note receivable balance and the remaining $72,000 applied towards interest income. There was an allowance for losses on notes receivable of $7,000 for this note receivable. Due to the receipt of a settlement which exceeded the net carrying value of the note receivable, this allowance was reversed and recognized as income. The activity in the allowance for losses on notes receivable during the years ended December 31, is as follows: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Beginning balance $ 368 $ 368 Provision for (recovery of) losses (7) -- Write downs (3) -- ----- ----- Ending balance $ 358 $ 368 ===== ===== Note 5. Equipment on Operating Leases and Investment in Financing Leases. Equipment on lease consists primarily of computer peripheral equipment, computer mainframes and reproduction equipment. The Partnership's operating leases are for initial lease terms of approximately 12 to 48 months. During the remaining terms of existing operating leases, the Partnership will not recover all of the undepreciated cost and related expenses of its rental equipment, and therefore must remarket a portion of its equipment in future years. The Partnership has agreements with some of the manufacturers of its equipment, whereby such manufacturers will undertake to remarket off-lease equipment on a best-efforts basis. This agreement permits the Partnership to assume the remarketing function directly if certain conditions contained in the agreements are not met. For their remarketing services, the manufacturers are paid a percentage of net monthly rentals. The Partnership has entered into direct lease arrangements with lessees consisting of Fortune 1000 companies and other businesses in different industries located throughout the United States. Generally, it is the responsibility of the lessee to provide maintenance on leased equipment. The General Partner administers the equipment portfolio of leases acquired through Page 20 of 31 the direct leasing program. Administration includes the collection of rents from the lessees and remarketing of the equipment. The net investment in financing leases consists of the following at December 31: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Minimum lease payments to be received $ 159 $ 507 Estimated residual value of leased equipment (unguaranteed) 95 95 Less: unearned income (6) (38) ----- ----- Net investment in financing leases $ 248 $ 564 ===== ===== Minimum rentals to be received on noncancellable operating and financing leases for the years ended December 31 are as follows: Operating Financing (Amounts in Thousands) 1996 ...................................... $264 $159 1997 ...................................... 56 -- 1998 ...................................... 22 -- ---- ---- Total $342 $159 ==== ==== The Partnership receives contingent monthly rental payments on its reproduction equipment that is not included in the minimum rentals to be received. The contingent monthly rentals consist of a monthly rental payment that is based upon actual machine usage. The monthly usage charge included in income for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 was $196,000, $376,000 and $978,000, respectively. The net book value of equipment held for lease at December 31, 1995 and 1994 amounted to $0 and $36,000, respectively. Note 6. Cable Systems, Property and Equipment. The cost of cable systems, property and equipment and the related accumulated depreciation consist of the following at December 31: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Distribution systems $ 960 $ 933 Headend equipment 338 330 Building 270 251 Land 21 21 Automobiles 48 19 ------- ------- 1,637 1,554 Less: accumulated depreciation (640) (469) ------- ------- Net property, cable systems and equipment $ 997 $ 1,085 ======= ======= Depreciation expense totaled approximately $172,000 and $43,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for the period from September 15, 1994 to December 31, 1994, respectively. Page 21 of 31 Note 7. Investment in Joint Ventures. Equipment Joint Ventures. The Partnership owns a limited or general partnership interest in equipment joint ventures. These investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The other partners of the ventures are entities organized and managed by the General Partner. The purpose of the joint ventures is the acquisition and leasing of various types of equipment. During the term of the Partnership, Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund II has participated in the following equipment joint ventures: Weighted Joint Venture Percentage Interest ------------- ------------------- Phoenix Leasing Joint Venture 1990-1 13.23% Phoenix Joint Venture 1994-1 31.25 An analysis of the Partnership's investment in equipment joint ventures is as follows:
Net Investment Equity in Net Investment at Beginning Earnings at End Date of Period Contributions (Losses) Distributions of Period - ---- -------------- ------------- --------- ------------- -------------- (Amounts in Thousands) Year Ended December 31, 1993 $ 475 $ 0 $ (100) $ 356 $ 19 ======= ======== ======= ======= ========= Year Ended December 31, 1994 $ 19 $ 1,463 $ 6 $ 0 $ 1,488 ======== ======== ======= ======= ========= Year Ended December 31, 1995 $ 1,488 $ 0 $ 342 $ 835 $ 995 ======== ======== ======= ======= =========
The aggregate combined financial information of the equipment joint ventures as of December 31 and for the years then ended is presented as follows: COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS ASSETS December 31, 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Cash and cash equivalents $ 532 $ 122 Accounts receivable 1,773 2,155 Operating lease equipment 1,021 2,527 Other assets 690 890 ------ ------ Total Assets $4,016 $5,694 ====== ====== LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL Accounts payable $ 918 $ 904 Partners' capital 3,098 4,790 ------ ------ Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital $4,016 $5,694 ====== ====== Page 22 of 31 COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCOME For the Years Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 ---- ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Rental income $3,595 $ 2,583 $ 3,791 Gain on sale of equipment 1,637 1,096 1,177 Other income 716 38 8 ------ ------- ------- Total Income 5,948 3,717 4,976 ------ ------- ------- EXPENSES Depreciation 1,186 1,248 1,677 Lease related operating expenses 2,832 2,378 3,688 Management fee to the General Partner 286 197 291 Other expenses 268 61 54 ------ ------- ------- Total Expenses 4,572 3,884 5,710 ------ ------- ------- Net Income (Loss) $1,376 $ (167) $ (734) ====== ======= ======= As of December 31, 1995 and 1994, the Partnership's pro rata interest in the equipment joint ventures' net book value of off-lease equipment was $32,000 and $13,000, respectively. The General Partner earns a management fee of 3.5% of the Partnership's respective interest in the gross receipts of the joint venture. Revenues subject to a management fee at the joint venture level are not subject to management fees at the Partnership level. Note 8. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses. Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Equipment lease operations $237 $383 Sales and property taxes 124 365 General Partner and affiliates 47 43 Other 176 194 ---- ---- Total $584 $985 ==== ==== Note 9. Settlement. On July 1, 1991, Phoenix Leasing Incorporated, as General Partner to the Partnership and sixteen other affiliated partnerships, filed suit in the Superior Court for the County of Marin, Case No. 150016, against Xerox Corporation, a corporation with which the General Partner had entered into contractual agreements for the acquisition and administration of leased equipment. The lawsuit was settled out of court effective as of October 28, 1994 pursuant to the terms of a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release. The settlement agreement generally provides for compensation payable to the Partnership and its affiliates in cash and kind, including the assignment by Xerox of certain goods and services. The agreement further provides for the sale by Xerox to the Partnership and its affiliates of equipment subject to lease. The suit that was filed in the Superior Court for the County of Marin, Case No. 150016, has been dismissed with prejudice on the merits. Page 23 of 31 The Partnership's pro rata share of the Xerox settlement was $1,180,000, which consists of cash of $469,000, and assigned monthly rentals and credits for goods and services valued at $711,000. In addition, the Partnership purchased additional leased equipment at an aggregate cost of $718,000. The Partnership, along with sixteen other affiliated partnerships managed by the General Partner, contributed its share of the assigned monthly rentals, credits for goods and services and purchased equipment leases to Phoenix Joint Venture 1994-1, in exchange for an interest in the joint venture. Note 10. Income Taxes. Federal and state income tax regulations provide that taxes on the income or loss of the Partnership are reportable by the partners in their individual income tax returns. Accordingly, no provision for such taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements. The net differences between the tax basis and the reported amounts of the Partnership's assets and liabilities is as follows at December 31: Reported Amounts Tax Basis Net Difference ---------------- --------- -------------- (Amounts in Thousands) 1995 Assets $5,404 $6,033 $(629) Liabilities 380 343 37 1994 Assets $5,561 $6,120 $(559) Liabilities 777 773 4 The Subsidiary is a corporation subject to state and federal tax regulations. The Subsidiary reports to the taxing authority on the accrual basis. When income and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial reporting purposes than for income tax purposes, deferred taxes are provided for such differences using the liability method. For the years ended December 31, the Subsidiary's income tax provision includes the following components: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Current tax expense $ 11 $ 19 Deferred tax benefit 28 (8) ---- ---- Income tax provision, net $ 39 $ 11 ==== ==== The income tax provision differed from the statutory federal rate because of the following: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Federal income tax benefit, based on statutory federal and state income tax rate of 37.3% $19 $11 Depreciation and amortization 9 7 Bad debt expense -- 1 Prior year tax payments 11 -- --- --- Total income tax provision $39 $19 === === Page 24 of 31 The Subsidiary's net deferred tax asset as of December 31, resulted from the following temporary differences: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Depreciation and amortization $105 $141 Bad debt expense 3 1 Net operating loss carryforward 10 -- ---- ---- Total $118 $142 ==== ==== As of December 31, 1995 and 1994, the Subsidiary's net operating loss carryforward of $26,300 and $0, respectively, for federal and state tax reporting purposes expires December 31, 2010. The Partnership has not provided a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset as of December 31, 1995 based on the General Partner's evaluation of the likelihood that such benefit will be ultimately realized. Note 11. Related Entities. The General Partner and its affiliates serve in the capacity of general partner in other partnerships, all of which are engaged in the equipment leasing and financing business. Note 12. Reimbursed Costs to the General Partner. The General Partner incurs certain administrative costs, such as data processing, investor and lessee communications, lease administration, accounting, equipment storage and equipment remarketing, for which it is reimbursed by the Partnership. These expenses incurred by the General Partner are to be reimbursed at the lower of the actual costs or an amount equal to 90% of the fair market value for such services. The reimbursed administrative costs to the General Partner were $162,000, $147,000 and $139,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The equipment storage, remarketing and data processing costs reimbursed to the General Partner during the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 were $13,000, $32,000 and $95,000, respectively. In addition, the General Partner receives a management fee and an acquisition fee (see Note 1). Note 13. Net Income and Distributions per Limited Partnership Unit. Net income and distributions per limited partnership unit were based on the Limited Partners' share of consolidated net income and distributions, and the weighted average number of units outstanding of 379,583 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. For the purposes of allocating consolidated income and distributions to each individual Limited Partner, the Partnership allocates consolidated net income and distributions based upon each respective Limited Partner's ending capital account balance. Note 14. Subsequent Events. In January 1996, cash distributions of $239,000 were made to the Limited Partners. Note 15. Business Segments. The Partnership currently operates in two business segments: the equipment leasing and financing industry and the cable TV industry. The operations in the cable TV industry are for the year ended December 31, 1995 and the period from the date of acquisition (September 15, 1994) to December 31, 1994. Information about the Partnership's operations in these two segments are as follows: Page 25 of 31 1995 1994 1993 ---- ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Total Revenues Equipment leasing and financing $2,274 $4,896 $5,613 Cable TV operations 594 199 0 ------ ------ ------ Total $2,868 $5,095 $5,613 ====== ====== ====== Net Income Equipment leasing and financing $1,160 $2,918 $1,570 Cable TV operations 4 7 0 ------ ------ ------ Total $1,164 $2,925 $1,570 ====== ====== ====== Identifiable Assets Equipment leasing and financing $4,658 $4,774 $6,922 Cable TV operations 1,492 1,564 0 ------ ------ ------ Total $6,150 $6,338 $6,922 ====== ====== ====== Depreciation and Amortization Expense Equipment leasing and financing $ 288 $ 424 $2,010 Cable TV operations 200 50 0 ------ ------ ------ Total $ 488 $ 474 $2,010 ====== ====== ====== Capital Expenditures Equipment leasing and financing $ 32 $ 813 $ 192 Cable TV operations 86 128 0 ------ ------ ------ Total $ 118 $ 941 $ 192 ====== ====== ====== Note 16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments. During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Partnership adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," which requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument which it is practicable to estimate that value. Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. Notes Receivable The fair value of notes receivable is estimated based on the lesser of the discounted expected future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings, or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. Marketable Securities The fair values of investments in marketable securities are estimated based on quoted market prices. The estimated fair values of the Partnership's financial instruments at December 31, 1995 are as follows: Carrying Amount Fair Value -------- ---------- (Amounts in Thousands) Assets Cash and cash equivalents $1,951 $1,951 Marketable securities 26 26 Notes receivable 1,390 2,786 Page 26 of 31 Item 9. Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Matters. None. PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. The registrant is a limited partnership and, therefore, has no executive officers or directors. The general partner of the registrant is Phoenix Leasing Incorporated, a California corporation. The directors and executive officers of Phoenix Leasing Incorporated (PLI) are as follows: GUS CONSTANTIN, age 58, is President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of PLI. Mr. Constantin received a B.S. degree in Engineering from the University of Michigan and a Master's Degree in Management Science from Columbia University. From 1969 to 1972, he served as Director, Computer and Technical Equipment of DCL Incorporated (formerly Diebold Computer Leasing Incorporated), a corporation formerly listed on the American Stock Exchange, and as Vice President and General Manager of DCL Capital Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of DCL Incorporated. Mr. Constantin was actively engaged in marketing manufacturer leasing programs to computer and medical equipment manufacturers and in directing DCL Incorporated's IBM System/370 marketing activities. Prior to 1969, Mr. Constantin was employed by IBM as a data processing systems engineer for four years. Mr. Constantin is an individual general partner in four active partnerships and is an NASD registered principal. Mr. Constantin is the founder of PLI and the beneficial owner of all of the common stock of Phoenix American Incorporated. PARITOSH K. CHOKSI, age 42, is Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of PLI. He has been associated with PLI since 1977. Mr. Choksi oversees the finance, accounting, information services and systems development departments of the General Partner and its Affiliates and oversees the structuring, planning and monitoring of the partnerships sponsored by the General Partner and its Affiliates. Mr. Choksi graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India with a degree in Engineering. He holds an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley. GARY W. MARTINEZ, age 45, is Senior Vice President of PLI. He has been associated with PLI since 1976. He manages the Asset Management Department, which is responsible for lease and loan portfolio management. This includes credit analysis, contract terms, documentation and funding; remittance application, change processing and maintenance of customer accounts; customer service, invoicing, collection, settlements and litigation; negotiating lease renewals, extensions, sales and buyouts; and management information reporting. From 1973 to 1976, Mr. Martinez was a Loan Officer with Crocker National Bank, San Francisco. Prior to 1973, he was an Area Manager with Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company. Mr. Martinez is a graduate of California State University, Chico. BRYANT J. TONG, age 41, is Senior Vice President, Financial Operations of PLI. He has been with PLI since 1982. Mr. Tong is responsible for investor services and overall company financial operations. He is also responsible for the technical and administrative operations of the cash management, corporate accounting, partnership accounting, accounting systems, internal controls and tax departments, in addition to Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory agency reporting. Prior to his association with PLI, Mr. Tong was Controller-Partnership Accounting with the Robert A. McNeil Corporation for two years and was an auditor with Ernst & Whinney (succeeded by Ernst & Young) from 1977 through 1980. Mr. Tong holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of California, Berkeley, and is a Certified Public Accountant. CYNTHIA E. PARKS, age 40, is Vice President, General Counsel, Assistant Secretary and a Director of PLI. Prior to joining PLI in 1984, she was with GATX Leasing Corporation, and had previously been Corporate Counsel for Stone Financial Companies, and an Assistant Vice President of the Bank of America, Bank Amerilease Group. She has a bachelor's degree from Santa Clara University, and earned her J.D. from the University of San Francisco School of Law. HOWARD SOLOVEI, age 34, is Vice President, Finance, Assistant Treasurer and a Director of PLI. He has been associated with PLI since 1984. Mr. Solovei's principal activities are in the areas of arranging and managing the company's banking relationships for its various corporations, partnerships and securitized Page 27 of 31 assets pools. Mr. Solovei is also involved in corporate financial planning and various data processing-related projects. Mr. Solovei graduated with a B.S. in Business from the University of California at Berkeley in 1984. Neither the General Partner nor any Executive Officer of the General Partner has any family relationship with the others. Phoenix Leasing Incorporated or its affiliates and the executive officers of the General Partner serve in a similar capacity to the following affiliated limited partnerships: Phoenix Leasing American Business Fund, L.P. Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. Phoenix Income Fund, L.P. Phoenix High Tech/High Yield Fund Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund IV Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Fund III Phoenix Leasing Capital Assurance Fund Phoenix Leasing Income Fund VII Phoenix Leasing Income Fund VI Phoenix Leasing Growth Fund 1982 Phoenix Leasing Income Fund 1981 and Phoenix Leasing Income Fund 1977 Item 11. Executive Compensation. Set forth is the information relating to all direct remuneration paid or accrued by the Registrant during the last year to the General Partner and its affiliate.
(A) (B) (C) (D) Aggregate of Name of Capacities Cash and cash- contingent Individual or in which equivalent forms forms of persons in group served of remuneration remuneration - ---------------- ----------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------ (C1) (C2) Securities or Salaries, fees, property insurance directors' fees, benefits or reim- commissions and bursement, personal bonuses benefits ---------------- ------------------- (Amounts in Thousands) Phoenix Leasing Incorporated General Partner $ 100(1) $ 0 $ 0 Phoenix Cable Management Inc. Manager 27(2) 0 0 ----- ---- --- $ 127 $ 0 $ 0 ===== ==== === (1) consists of management and acquisition fees. (2) consists of management fees.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. (a) No person owns of record, or is known by the Registrant to own beneficially, more than five percent of any class of voting securities of the Registrant. Page 28 of 31 (b) The General Partner of the Registrant owns the equity securities of the Registrant set forth in the following table:
(1) (2) (3) Title of Class Amount Beneficially Owned Percent of Class -------------- ------------------------- ---------------- General Partner Represents a 5% interest in the Registrant's profits 100% Interest and distributions, until the Limited Partners have recovered their capital contributions plus a cumulative return of 12% per annum, compounded quarterly, on the unrecovered portion thereof. Thereafter, the General Partner will receive 15% interest in the Registrant's profits and distributions. Limited Partner Interest 336 units .09%
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. None. PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K. Page No. -------- (a) 1. Financial Statements: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 ................................................ 11 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 .................. 12 Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 ............ 13 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 .................. 14 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............... 15-25 2. Financial Statement Schedule: Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves ................................................ 31 All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. (b) Reports on Form 8-K: No reports on Form 8-K were filed for the year ended December 31, 1995. Page 29 of 31 (c) Exhibits 21. Additional Exhibits a) Listing of all subsidiaries of the Registrant: Phoenix Concept Cablevision, Inc., a Nevada corporation and majority (58%) owned subsidiary. b) Financial Statements for Significant Subsidiaries: Phoenix Joint Venture 1994-1 E21 1-10 27. Financial Data Schedule Page 30 of 31 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II (Registrant) BY: PHOENIX LEASING INCORPORATED, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION GENERAL PARTNER Date: March 28, 1996 By: /S/ GUS CONSTANTIN -------------- ------------------------- Gus Constantin, President Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date --------- ----- ---- /S/ GUS CONSTANTIN March 28, 1996 - ----------------------- President, Chief Executive Officer and a -------------- (Gus Constantin) Director of Phoenix Leasing Incorporated General Partner /S/ PARITOSH K. CHOKSI March 28, 1996 - ----------------------- Chief Financial Officer, -------------- (Paritosh K. Choksi) Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Phoenix Leasing Incorporated General Partner /S/ BRYANT J. TONG March 28, 1996 - ---------------------- Senior Vice President, Financial -------------- (Bryant J. Tong) Operations of (Principal Accounting Officer) Phoenix Leasing Incorporated General Partner /S/ GARY W. MARTINEZ March 28, 1996 - --------------------- Senior Vice President of -------------- (Gary W. Martinez) Phoenix Leasing Incorporated General Partner /S/ HOWARD SOLOVEI March 28, 1996 - ---------------------- Vice President, Finance -------------- (Howard Solovei) Assistant Treasurer and a Director of Phoenix Leasing Incorporated General Partner /S/ MICHAEL K. ULYATT Partnership Controller March 28, 1996 - ---------------------- Phoenix Leasing Incorporated -------------- (Michael K. Ulyatt) General Partner
Page 31 of 31 PHOENIX LEASING CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND II AND SUBSIDIARY SCHEDULE II (Amounts in Thousands) SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F Classification Balance at Charged to Charged to Deductions Balance at Beginning of Expense Revenue End of Period Period - ------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ----------------- -------------- ------------------ Year ended December 31, 1993 Allowance for losses on accounts receivable $ 468 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15 $ 453 Allowance for early termination of financing leases 4 0 4 0 0 Allowance for losses on notes receivable 253 115 0 0 368 -------- ------- ----- -------- -------- Totals $ 725 $ 115 $ 4 $ 15 $ 821 ======== ======= ===== ======== ======== Year ended December 31, 1994 Allowance for losses on accounts receivable $ 453 $ 2 $ 334 $ 38 $ 83 Allowance for losses on notes receivable 368 0 0 0 368 -------- ------- ----- -------- -------- Totals $ 821 $ 2 $ 334 $ 38 $ 451 ======== ======= ===== ======== ======== Year ended December 31, 1995 Allowance for losses on accounts receivable $ 83 $ 17 $ 0 $ 33 $ 67 Allowance for losses on notes receivable 368 0 7 3 358 -------- ------- ----- -------- -------- Totals $ 451 $ 17 $ 7 $ 36 $ 425 ======== ======= ===== ======== ========
EX-21 2 Exhibit 21 - Page 1 of 10 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Venturers of Phoenix Joint Venture 1994-1 We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Phoenix Joint Venture 1994-1 (a California general partnership) as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related statements of operations, venturers' capital and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for the period from inception (October 28, 1994) to December 31, 1994. These financial statements and the schedule referred to below are the responsibility of the Joint Venture's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Phoenix Joint Venture 1994-1 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995 and for the period from inception (October 28, 1994) to December 31, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Schedule II is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP San Francisco, California January 9, 1996 Exhibit 21 - Page 2 of 10 PHOENIX JOINT VENTURE 1994-1 BALANCE SHEET (Amounts in Thousands)
December 31, 1995 1994 ---- ---- ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 433 $ 106 Accounts receivable (net of allowance for losses on accounts receivable of $191 and $0 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively) 215 389 Credits receivable, net 1,237 1,423 Assigned monthly rentals, net 691 890 Equipment on operating leases and held for lease (net of accumulated depreciation of $849 and $77 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively) 1,004 2,223 Capitalized acquisition fees (net of accumulated amortization of $22 and $1 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively) 17 38 --------- --------- Total Assets $ 3,597 $ 5,069 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND VENTURERS' CAPITAL Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 399 $ 334 --------- --------- Total Liabilities 399 334 --------- --------- Venturers' Capital 3,198 4,735 --------- --------- Total Liabilities and Venturers' Capital $ 3,597 $ 5,069 ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Exhibit 21 - Page 3 of 10 PHOENIX JOINT VENTURE 1994-1 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Amounts in Thousands) For the period from inception (October 28, 1994) December 31, through 1995 December 31, 1994 ----------- ----------------- INCOME Rental income $2,767 $ 389 Gain on sale of equipment 417 -- Earned income, assigned monthly rentals 81 20 Other income 109 17 ------ ------ Total Income 3,374 426 ------ ------ EXPENSES Lease related operating expenses 1,179 169 Depreciation 955 77 Amortization, acquisition fees 21 1 Management fees to General Partner 174 20 Provision for losses on receivables 191 -- General and administrative expenses 1 -- ------ ------ Total Expenses 2,521 267 ------ ------ NET INCOME $ 853 $ 159 ====== ====== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. Exhibit 21 - Page 4 of 10 PHOENIX JOINT VENTURE 1994-1 STATEMENT OF VENTURERS' CAPITAL (Amounts in Thousands) Balance at inception, October 28, 1994 $ 0 Net income 159 Contributions 4,576 ------- Balance, December 31, 1994 4,735 Net income 853 Distributions (2,390) ------- Balance, December 31, 1995 $ 3,198 ======= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. Exhibit 21 - Page 5 of 10 PHOENIX JOINT VENTURE 1994-1 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Amounts in Thousands) For the period from inception (October 28, 1994) December 31, through 1995 December 31, 1994 ------------ ----------------- Operating Activities: Net income $ 853 $ 159 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 955 77 Amortization of acquisition fees 21 1 Gain on sale of equipment (417) -- Provision for losses on accounts receivable 191 -- Decrease in credits receivable 278 -- Increase in accounts receivable (17) (389) Amortization of discount on credits (92) (17) Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 103 295 Accrued interest, assigned monthly rentals (81) (20) ------- ----- Net cash provided by operating activities 1,794 106 ------- ----- Investing Activities: Principal payments, notes receivable 280 -- Proceeds from sale of equipment 681 -- Payment of acquisition fees (38) -- ------- ----- Net cash provided by investing activities 923 -- ------- ----- Financing Activities: Distributions to Venturers (2,390) -- ------- ----- Net cash used by financing activities (2,390) -- ------- ----- Increase in cash and cash equivalents 327 106 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 106 -- ------- ----- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 433 $ 106 ======= ===== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. Exhibit 21 - Page 6 of 10 PHOENIX JOINT VENTURE 1994-1 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1995 Note 1. Organization. Phoenix Joint Venture 1994-1 (the "Joint Venture"), a California general partnership, was formed on October 28, 1994 for the purpose of investing in a pool of reproduction equipment and receivables by several Phoenix Leasing Partnerships (the "Venturers"). Income or loss is allocated to each Venturer based upon their respective interest in the Joint Venture. Distributions will be made in the same manner. As compensation for its management services, the Joint Venture pays a management fee to Phoenix Leasing Incorporated (PLI) based upon the management fee rate of each respective Venturer of the Joint Venture applied to the Venturers' respective interest in the Joint venture's gross revenues for the quarter, which revenue generally incudes rental and note receipts, proceeds from the sale of equipment and other income. Any revenues subject to a management fee at the Joint Venture level will not be subject to a management fee at the Venturers' level. As compensation for services performed in connection with the analysis of equipment available to the Joint Venture, the Managing Venturer receives an acquisition fee based on the acquisition fee rate of each respective Venturer of the Joint Venture applied to the Venturer's respective interest in the Joint Venture's purchase price of equipment acquired by the Joint Venture. Acquisition fees are amortized over the average expected life of the assets, principally on a straight-line basis. Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Leasing Operations - The Joint Venture's leasing operations consist of reproduction equipment manufactured by Xerox Corporation. The leases have been classified as operating leases. Under the method of accounting for operating leases, the leased equipment is recorded as an asset at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of five years. Rental income for the year is determined on the basis of rental payments due for the period under the terms of the lease. Maintenance and repairs of the leased equipment are charged to expense as incurred. The Joint Venture's policy is to review periodically the probability of recovering its undepreciated cost of equipment. Such reviews address, among other matters recent and anticipated technological developments affecting reproduction equipment and competitive factors within the reproduction equipment marketplace. Although remarketing rental rates are expected to decline in the future with respect to some of the Joint Venture's rental equipment, such rentals are expected to exceed projected expenses, including depreciation. Should subsequent reviews of the equipment portfolio indicate that rentals plus anticipated sales proceeds will not exceed expenses in any future period, the Joint Venture will revise its depreciation policy and may accelerate depreciation as appropriate. The Joint Venture has also been assigned the monthly rental payments from a pool of engineering and graphics reprographic equipment owned by Xerox Corporation. The Joint Venture has recorded these assigned monthly rentals at the discounted value of the expected cash flows. The excess of the assigned monthly rentals over the present value of the expected cash flows is recorded as unearned income. Unearned income is credited to income monthly over the term of the agreement on a declining basis to provide an approximate level rate of return on the unrecovered cost of the investment. Non-Cash Investing Activities. In October 1994, the Venturers formed the Joint Venture to which they contributed the credits issued by Xerox Corporation, the equipment purchased and the assigned monthly rentals from Xerox Corporation as described in Notes 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the financial statements. The following non-cash activities from this transaction were excluded from the statement of cash flow. Exhibit 21 - Page 7 of 10 Amounts In Thousands ------------ Credit receivable $1,406 Equipment purchased 2,300 Assigned monthly rentals 870 ------ $4,576 ====== Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents includes deposits at banks and investments in money market funds. Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Note 3. Credits Receivable. The Joint Venture owns credits issued by Xerox Corporation for the purchase of products and services from Xerox Corporation and its subsidiaries. The Credits granted are non-transferrable and are good for a period of seven years at which time they expire. The credits will be used by Phoenix Leasing Incorporated and affiliates, who will reimburse the Joint Venture for the fair market value of the credits used. The credits receivable consist of the following at December 31, 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Credits receivable $ 1,402 $ 1,680 Unamortized discount (165) (257) ------- ------- Credits receivable, net $ 1,237 $ 1,423 ======= ======= Note 4. Assigned Monthly Rentals. The Joint Venture has obtained the right to receive payments on a pool of leased equipment pursuant to the terms of an agreement with Xerox Corporation. Title to this equipment continues to be held by Xerox Corporation. As a result of this agreement, the Joint Venture has been assigned the monthly rentals from a designated pool of engineering and graphics reprographic equipment that are subject to lease. The agreement provides for the Joint Venture to receive monthly payments from such pool of equipment for a period of either three or five years, depending upon the performance of the portfolio as measured during the first two years. All of the monthly rental payments pursuant to this equipment, net of certain administrative and other costs, are passed along to the Joint Venture and will be applied towards the outstanding assigned monthly rentals balance and income. The assigned monthly rentals consist of the following at December 31, 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Assigned monthly rentals $ 720 $ 1,000 Less: Unearned income (29) (110) ----- ------- Assigned monthly rentals, net $ 691 $ 890 ===== ======= Exhibit 21 - Page 8 of 10 Note 5. Equipment on Operating Leases. Equipment on lease consists of reproduction equipment classified as operating leases. During the initial terms of the existing operating leases the Joint Venture will not recover all the undepreciated cost and related expenses of its rental equipment and therefore must remarket a portion of its equipment in future years. Minimum rentals to be received on non-cancelable operating leases for the years ended December 31, are as follows: (Amounts in Thousands) 1996 ........................................... $362 1997 ........................................... 194 1998 ........................................... 57 1999 and future ................................ 3 ---- Total $616 ==== The Joint Venture has an agreement with Xerox Corporation, whereby Xerox Corporation provides administration, maintenance and repairs of leased equipment on behalf of the Joint Venture. The agreement terminates upon the earlier of (1) the Joint Venture receiving a specified dollar amount; (2) 66 months, or (3) the date on which no equipment remains. As compensation for these services, Xerox deducts a fee from the monthly rentals and sales proceeds. Also pursuant to the vendor agreement, Xerox Corporation undertakes to remarket and refurbish off-lease equipment on a best efforts basis. This agreement permits the Joint Venture to assume the remarketing function directly if certain conditions contained in the agreement are not met. For its remarketing services, Xerox Corporation is paid a remarketing and refurbishing fee based on a specified percentage of the monthly rentals received by the Joint Venture. The Joint Venture also receives contingent rental payments on its reproduction equipment that is not included in the minimum rentals to be received. The contingent rentals consist of a monthly rental payment that is based upon actual machine usage. Note 6. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses. Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31: 1995 1994 ---- ---- (Amounts in Thousands) Equipment lease operations $368 $275 PLI and affiliates 31 59 ---- ---- Total $399 $334 ==== ==== Note 7. Income Taxes. Federal and state income tax regulations provide that taxes on the income or loss of the Joint Venture are reportable by the Venturers on their individual income tax returns. Accordingly, no provision for such taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements. The net differences between the tax basis and the reported amounts of the Partnership's assets and liabilities is as follows at December 31: Exhibit 21 - Page 9 of 10 Reported Amounts Tax Basis Net Difference ---------------- --------- -------------- (Amounts in Thousands) 1995 Assets $3,597 $4,081 $(484) Liabilities 399 395 4 1994 Assets $5,069 $4,916 $ 153 Liabilities 334 334 0 Note 8. Related Entities. The Joint Venture is sponsored and funded by various partnerships managed by PLI. PLI serves in the capacity of general partner in other partnerships and managing venturer in other joint ventures, all of which are engaged in the equipment leasing and financing business. Note 9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments. During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Joint Venture adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," which requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument which it is practicable to estimate that value. Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. Credits Receivable, Net The fair value of credits receivable, net is estimated by the present value of future cash flow discounted at an approximate fair value rate. Assigned Monthly Rents, Net The carrying amount of assigned monthly rents, net approximates fair value and is estimated by taking a present value of the projected cash flow expected to be received on the portfolio of equipment that was assigned from Xerox pursuant to the agreement. The estimated fair values of the Joint Venture's financial instruments at December 31, 1995 are as follows: Carrying Amount Fair Value -------- ---------- (Amounts in Thousands) Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 433 $ 433 Credits receivable, net 1,237 1,237 Assigned monthly rents, net 691 691 Exhibit 21 - Page 10 of 10 PHOENIX JOINT VENTURE 1994-1 SCHEDULE II (Amounts in Thousands) SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F Classification Balance at Charged to Charged to Deductions Balance at Beginning of Expense Revenue End of Period Period - ------------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Year ended December 31, 1994 Allowance for credits receivable $ 320 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 320 ------- ------ --- ------ ------- Totals $ 320 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 320 ======= ====== === ====== ======= Year ended December 31, 1995 Allowance for credits receivable $ 320 $ 0 $ 0 $ 80 $ 240 Allowance for losses on accounts receivable 0 191 0 0 191 ------- ------ --- ------ ------- Totals $ 320 $ 191 $ 0 $ 80 $ 431 ======= ====== === ====== =======
EX-27 3
5 1,000 YEAR DEC-31-1995 DEC-31-1995 1,951 0 1,925 425 0 0 6,797 5,701 6,150 0 0 0 0 0 5,025 6,150 0 2,868 0 1,662 0 10 0 1,206 39 1,164 0 0 0 1,164 3.04 0
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----