10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2011

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-16106

Clearfield, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Minnesota	41-1347235
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

5480 Nathan Lane North, Suite 120, Plymouth, Minnesota 55442

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(763) 476-6866

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] YES       NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] YES       NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a “large accelerated filer,” an “accelerated filer,” a “non-accelerated filer” or a “smaller reporting company” (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[  ] Large accelerated filer   [  ] Accelerated filer    [  ] Non-accelerated filer   [X] Smaller Reporting Company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[  ] YES       NO [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class:	Outstanding at January 20, 2012
Common stock, par value $.01	12,326,233

CLEARFIELD, INC.

 FORM 10-Q

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1
ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	1
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	8
ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	11
ITEM  4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	11
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	12
ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	12
ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS	12
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	12
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	12
ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]	12
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	12
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	12
SIGNATURES	13

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CLEARFIELD, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

UNAUDITED

	December 31, 2011			September 30,  2011
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,375,003		$	11,281,027
Short-term investments		3,878,000			1,849,000
Accounts receivable, net		2,026,758			3,228,864
Inventories		2,528,067			2,757,151
Deferred taxes		994,000			994,000
Other current assets		228,551			170,243
Total Current Assets		17,030,379			20,280,285
Property, plant and equipment, net		930,690			986,031
Other Assets
Long-term investments		5,314,000			2,707,000
Goodwill		2,570,511			2,570,511
Deferred taxes –long term		3,537,692			3,558,797
Other		199,467			199,467
Total other assets		11,621,670			9,035,775
Total Assets	$	29,582,739		$	30,302,091
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable		969,756			1,439,611
Accrued compensation		1,035,146			2,465,132
Accrued expenses		72,726			106,383
Total current liabilities		2,077,628			4,011,126
Deferred rent		56,202			61,794
Total Liabilities		2,133,830			4,072,920
Commitment and Contingencies		-			-
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 500 shares; no shares outstanding
Common stock, authorized 50,000,000, $.01 par value; 12,326,233 and 12,270,691, shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011		123,262			122,707
Additional paid-in capital		53,621,722			53,402,138
Accumulated deficit		(26,296,075	)		(27,295,674	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		27,448,909			26,229,171
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	29,582,739		$	30,302,091

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1

CLEARFIELD, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

UNAUDITED

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
Revenues	$	9,165,201	$	7,246,669
Cost of sales		5,370,919		4,280,716
Gross profit		3,794,282		2,965,953
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative		2,773,114		2,459,319
Income from operations		1,021,168		506,634
Other income
Interest income		27,182		29,508
Other income		-		500
		27,182		30,008
Income before income taxes		1,048,350		536,642
Income tax expense		48,751		35,484
Net income	$	999,599	$	501,158
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.08	$	0.04
Diluted	$	0.08	$	0.04
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		12,299,554		12,019,289
Diluted		12,726,293		12,629,943

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2

CLEARFIELD, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

UNAUDITED

	Three Months Ended December 31
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	999,599		$	501,158
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		96,081			105,236
Deferred taxes		21,105			21,105
Loss on disposal of assets		21,081			-
Stock based compensation		112,153			58,287
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		1,202,106			925,045
Inventories		230,693			(92,949	)
Prepaid expenses and other		(58,308	)		3,045
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,939,090	)		120,342
Net cash provided by operating activities		685,420			1,641,269
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(63,430	)		(38,413	)
Purchases of investments		(5,232,000	)		(160,659	)
Proceeds from maturities of investments		596,000			195,527
Net cash used in investing activities		(4,699,430	)		(3,545	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan		70,305			37,722
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		37,681			10,530
Net cash provided by financing activities		107,986			48,252
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(3,906,024	)		1,685,976
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		11,281,027			5,285,719
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	7,375,003		$	6,971,695

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1.  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Pursuant to these rules and regulations, certain financial information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements have been condensed or omitted.  However, in the opinion of management, the financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows of the interim periods presented. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year or for any other interim period, due to variability in customer purchasing patterns and seasonal, operating and other factors. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.

In preparation of the Company’s financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Note 2.  Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted EPS equals net income divided by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus all additional common stock equivalents, such as stock options, when dilutive.

	Three Months Ended December 31
	2011		2010
Net income per common share — basic:
Net income	$	999,599	$	501,158
Weighted average shares outstanding basic		12,299,554		12,019,289
Net income per common share	$	0.08	$	0.04
Net income per common share — diluted
Net income	$	999,599	$	501,158
Weighted average shares outstanding		12,299,554		12,019,289
Dilutive impact of common stock equivalent outstanding		426,739		610,654
Weighted average shares outstanding— diluted		12,726,293		12,629,943
Net income per common share — diluted	$	0.08	$	0.04

4

Note  3. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

The Company currently invests its excess cash in money market accounts and bank certificates of deposit (CDs) with a term of not more than three years. CDs with original maturities of more than three months are reported as held-to-maturity investments and are carried at amortized cost. The maturity dates of the Company’s CDs at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 are as follows:

	December 31, 2011		September 30, 2010
Less than one year	$	3,878,000		$	1,849,000
1-3 years		5,314,000			2,707,000
Total	$	9,192,000		$	4,445,000

Note 4.  Stock Based Compensation

The Company recorded $112,153 of compensation expense related to current and past option grants, restricted stock grants and the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011.  The Company recorded $58,287 of compensation expense related to current and past equity awards for the three-month period ended December 31, 2010.  This expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense.  There was no tax benefit from recording this non-cash expense.  As of December 31, 2011, $1,021,887 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 5.6 years.

We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted average fair value of options during the three-month period ended December 31, 2010.  The weighted-average fair values at the grant date for options issued during the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $1.92. This fair value was estimated at grant date using the weighted-average assumptions listed below.

	Three months ended December 31, 2010
Dividend yield		0	%
Expected volatility		74.17	%
Average risk-free interest rate		1.58	%
Expected life	6 years
Vesting period	3 years

During the three month period ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not grant any incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted key employees incentive stock options to purchase an aggregate of 5,000 shares of common stock with a contractual term of 7 years, a three year vesting term and an exercise price of $3.00 with a fair value of $1.92 per share.

During the three month period ended December 31, 2011, exercised stock options totaled 46,106 shares, resulting in $37,681 of proceeds to the Company. During the three month period ended December 31, 2010, exercised stock options totaled 7,132 shares, resulting in $10,530 of proceeds to the Company.

The expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock for a period approximating the expected life. The expected life represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding after their grant date. The risk-free interest rate reflects the interest rate at grant date on zero-coupon U.S. governmental bonds having a remaining life similar to the expected option term.

5

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Clearfield, Inc.’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) allows participating employees to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount through payroll deductions. The ESPP is available to all employees subject to certain eligibility requirements. Terms of the ESPP provide that participating employees may purchase the Company’s common stock on a voluntary after-tax basis. Employees may purchase the Company’s common stock at a price that is no less than the lower of 85% of the fair market value of one share of common stock at the beginning or end of each stock purchase period or phase. The ESPP is carried out in six-month phases, with phases beginning on January 1 and July 1 of each calendar year. For the phases that ended on December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, employees purchased 11,267 and 17,710 shares at a price of $6.24 and $2.13 per share, respectively. After the employee purchase on December 31, 2011, 256,504 shares of common stock were available for future purchase under the ESPP.

Note 5.  Inventories

Inventories consist of the following as of:

	December 31, 2011		September 30, 2011
Raw materials	$	2,102,051	$	2,158,647
Work-in-progress		162,077		304,793
Finished goods		263,939		293,711
	$	2,528,067	$	2,757,151

Note 6.  Facilities

 During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received and accepted a purchase offer on its Aberdeen, South Dakota facility.  The Company had not occupied the facility since fiscal year 2006.  In June 2011, the Company completed the sale of the facility and land in the amount of $725,000. The final proceeds to the Company after transaction costs were $660,000. The Company recorded a gain on the sale of these assets of approximately $37,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. 

Note 7.  Major Customer Concentration

One customer, Power & Telephone Supply Company (Power & Tel) who serves as a reseller of the Company’s product to a range of Tier 2 and Tier 3 Telco carriers as well as cable service operators, comprised approximately 25% and 27% of total sales for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

At December 31, 2011, two customers accounted for 23% of accounts receivable.  KGP Logistics, Inc., (KGP)  a reseller, accounted for 13% and Power & Tel accounted for 10%.  At December 31, 2010, Power & Tel accounted for 29% of accounts receivable.  KGP’s sales did not exceed 10% of total sales for the three months ended December 31, 2011 or 2010. Power & Tel and KGP purchase our product through a standard form of purchase order.

Note 8. Goodwill and Patents

The Company analyzes its goodwill for impairment annually or at an interim period when events occur or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment.  The result of the analysis performed in the fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011 did not indicate an impairment of goodwill.  During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, there were no triggering events that indicate potential impairment exists.

The Company capitalizes legal costs incurred to obtain patents. Once accepted by either the U.S. Patent Office or the equivalent office of a foreign country, these legal costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining estimated lives, not exceeding 17 years. The Company currently has three patents pending with the U.S. Patent Office and in foreign countries.

Note 9. Income Taxes

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of approximately $49,000 and $35,000, for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The Company’s tax provision includes estimated current federal alternative minimum taxes and state franchise taxes, but is primarily related to deferred tax expense related to book and income tax basis difference in goodwill on prior asset acquisitions.  Our year-to-date net change in valuation allowance is $373,000.   This change consists of $395,000 of tax benefit as a result of a reduction in valuation allowance after considering current financial condition and potential future taxable income.  This reduction is partially offset by a $22,000 increase  in valuation  allowance from the current year AMT tax credit generated as its utilization does not meet the “more likely than not” approach as required by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740.

6

As of September 30, 2011 the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards of approximately $27,278,000 and $22,090,000, respectively, which expire in fiscal years 2013 to 2028 if not utilized. In fiscal 2009, the Company completed an Internal Revenue Code Section 382 analysis of the loss carry-forwards and determined that all of its loss carry-forwards were utilizable and not restricted under Section 382.

Deferred taxes recognize the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of the assets and liabilities recorded for financial statement purposes and these amounts measured in accordance with tax laws. The Company’s realization of net operating loss carry-forward and other deferred tax temporary differences is contingent upon future taxable earnings. The Company reviewed its deferred tax asset for expected utilization using a “more likely than not” approach as required by ASC 740 by assessing the available positive and negative factors surrounding its recoverability.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company reversed a portion of its valuation allowance in consideration of all available positive and negative evidence, including our historical operating results, current financial condition, and potential future taxable income.  The reduction in the valuation allowance in the fourth quarter resulted in a non-cash income tax benefit of $2,481,000.  As of September 30, 2011, the Company had a remaining valuation allowance of approximately $6,042,000.

The Company future taxable income was evaluated based primarily on anticipated operating results from fiscal years 2012 through 2014.  The Company determined that projecting operating results beyond 2014 involves substantial uncertainty and the Company discounted forecasts beyond 2014 as a basis to support its deferred tax assets.  Based upon the assessment of all available evidence, the Company reversed a portion of its valuation allowance for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 in an amount in which the tax benefit generated offsets the tax provision to be realized from current year estimated taxable income.  The Company will continue to assess the assumptions it uses to determine the amount of its valuation allowance and may adjust the valuation allowance in future periods based on changes in assumptions of estimated future taxable income and other factors. If the valuation allowance is reduced, the Company would record an income tax benefit in the period in which that determination is made. If the valuation allowance is increased, we would record additional income tax expense. For the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has reduced its valuation allowance by approximately $373,000 and $217,000 respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, we do not have any unrecognized tax benefits.  It is the Company’s practice to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.  The Company does not expect any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.

Note 10.  Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (Topic 820)—Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04), to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2012 and should be applied prospectively. Our adoption of ASU 2011-04 became effective the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and had no material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective for us beginning after December 15, 2012 and should be applied retrospectively.

7

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)—Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which is intended to simplify how entities test for goodwill impairment  by permitting an entity the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The standard will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairments tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of ASU 2011-08 became effective the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and had no material impact on our financial statements.

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-looking statements relate to future events and typically address the Company’s expected future business and financial performance. Words such as  “plan,” “expect,” “aim,” “believe,” “project,” “target,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “will,” “should,” “could” and other words and terms of similar meaning, typically identify these forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events and trends that are subject to risks and uncertainties.  Actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements because of the factors identified in and incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, as well as in other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which should be considered an integral part of Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”  All forward-looking statements included herein are made as the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the three and three-month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes in Item 1 of this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.

OVERVIEW

General

Clearfield, Inc. manufactures, markets, and sells an end-to-end fiber management and enclosure platform that consolidates, distributes and protects fiber as it moves from the inside plant to the outside plant and all the way to the home, business and cell site.  The Company has successfully established itself as a value-added supplier to its target market of broadband service providers, including independent local exchange carriers (telephone), multiple service operators (cable), wireless service providers, municipal-owned utilities, as well as commercial and industrial original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). Clearfield has expanded its product offerings and broadened its customer base during the last five years.

The Company has historically focused on the un-served or under-served rural communities who receive their voice, video and data services from independent telephone companies. By aligning its in-house engineering and technical knowledge alongside its customers, the Company has been able to develop, customize and enhance products from design through production.  Final build and assembly is completed at Clearfield’s plant in Plymouth, Minnesota with manufacturing support from a network of domestic and global manufacturing partners. Clearfield specializes in producing these products on both a quick-turn and scheduled delivery basis. The Company deploys a hybrid sales model with some sales made directly to the customer, some made through two-tier distribution (channel) partners, and some sales through original equipment suppliers who private label its products.

8

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

Revenues for the first fiscal quarter of 2012 ended December 31, 2011 were $9,165,000, an increase of 26% or approximately $1,918,000 from revenue of $7,247,000, for the first fiscal quarter of 2011. Revenue growth was experienced from existing clients as well as from the development of new accounts. The Company continued to experience gains from within Tier 3 Carriers, as well as from an emerging presence associated with Tier 2 Carriers who have a national footprint. One of the revenue drivers was an increase in product sales to engineering contractors providing Engineer, Furnish and Installation (EF&I) services to telco and cable broadband operators.  These gains were throughout the product line. Revenues derived from distributor arrangements continued to increase as additional distributors are now representing the Company. Revenues were positively affected by early stage deployments associated with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (stimulus funds).  The market continues to experience challenges associated with the limited supply of fiber cable and uncertainty over federal policy toward the Universal Service Fund, a federal program to support the delivery of telecommunications services to non-metropolitan communities, which has influenced the buying patterns of Clearfield’s customer base. Operating results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for future quarters or the entire year, due to variability in customer purchasing patterns and seasonal, operating and other factors.

Cost of sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $5,371,000, an increase of $1,090,000, or 26% from the $4,281,000 comparable period.  Gross margin improved to 41.4% from 40.9% for comparable first quarters of fiscal 2012 and 2011. Gross profit increased from $2,966,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 to $3,794,000 for the first fiscal quarter of 2012, an increase of 28% or $828,000. The year-over-year gain in gross profit percentage is derived from strategic sourcing and improved manufacturing processes designed to optimize margins. In addition, a product mix that continues to favor Clearfield value-added features teamed with these continual improvements in our manufacturing processes, which have resulted in greater manufacturing efficiency and absorption of factory overhead.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 13% or $314,000 from $2,459,000 for the first fiscal quarter of 2011 to $2,774,000 for the first fiscal quarter of 2012. This increase is primarily composed of $118,000 in higher compensation expenses, mainly associated with an increase in sales personnel. Marketing expenses increased $113,000 as a result of higher advertising and tradeshow costs within the period. Stock based compensation expense increased $54,000 in the fiscal 2012 period as a result of a higher amount of employee stock options outstanding in the 2012 quarter versus 2011.

Income from operations for the first fiscal quarter of 2012 was $1,021,000 compared to income of $507,000 for the first fiscal quarter of 2011, an improvement of $515,000 or 102%. This improvement is attributable to increased revenue and improved gross margin.

Interest income for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 was $27,000 compared to $30,000 for the comparable period for fiscal 2011. Interest rates have continued to decline resulting in lower returns. The Company invests its excess cash primarily in FDIC-backed bank certificates of deposit and money market accounts.

Income tax expense was $49,000 and $35,000 for the quarters ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Tax expense primarily relates to book and tax differences of goodwill totaling $21,000 and $21,000 respectively for each of the corresponding quarters. The balance of the income tax expense was for various states income and franchise taxes as well as alternative minimum tax (AMT).

The Company’s net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 ended December 31, 2011 was $1,000,000, or $0.08 per basic and diluted share. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011 ended December 31, 2010 the Company reported net income of $501,000, or $0.04 per basic and diluted share.

9

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of December 31, 2011, our principal source of liquidity was our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Those sources total $11,253,000 at December 31, 2011 compared to $13,130,000 at September 30, 2011.  Our excess cash is invested mainly in certificates of deposit backed by the FDIC and money market accounts. The majority of our funds are insured by the FDIC. Investments considered long-term are $5,314,000 at December 31, 2011, compared to $2,707,000 at September 30, 2011.  We believe the combined balances of short-term cash and investments along with long-term investments provide a more accurate indication of our available liquidity. At December 31, 2011, Clearfield had no debt along with $16,567,000 in cash and investments, up $730,000 from $15,837,000 from fiscal year end September 30, 2011.

The Company expects to fund operations with its working capital, which is the combination of existing cash and cash equivalent cash flow from operations, accounts receivable and inventory.  The Company intends to use its cash assets primarily for its continued organic growth.  Additionally, the Company may use some available cash for potential future strategic initiatives or alliances.  We believe our cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2011, along with cash flow from future operations, will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital resources needs for the next 12 months.

Operating Activities

Net cash generated from operating activities totaled $685,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2011. This was primarily due to net income of $1,000,000, which includes non-cash expenses for depreciation of $96,000, deferred taxes of $21,000, loss on asset disposals of $21,000, and stock based compensation of $112,000. Changes in cash from operating assets and liabilities include decreases in accounts receivable of $1,200,000 and inventory of $231,000, along with increases in prepaid expenses of $58,000 and accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1,939,000. The decrease in cash from accounts payable and accrued expenses reflects fiscal 2011 accrued bonus compensation accruals paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Net cash generated from operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2010 totaled $1,641,000. This was primarily due to net income of $501,000, depreciation of $105,000, deferred taxes of $21,000, stock based compensation of $58,000 and a decrease in accounts receivable of $925,000 and an increase in accounts payable of $120,000.  This was offset by an increase in inventories of $93,000. The source of cash from accounts receivable primarily results from higher sales levels in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 over the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

Investing Activities

We invest our excess cash in money market accounts and bank CDs in denominations across numerous banks. We believe we obtain a competitive rate of return given the economic climate along with the security provided by the FDIC on these investments. During the three month period ended December 31, 2011 we used cash to purchase $5,232,000 of FDIC-backed securities and received $596,000 on CDs that matured.  Purchases of capital equipment, mainly information technology equipment and vehicles, consumed $63,000 of cash.

During the three-month period ended December 31, 2010 we utilized cash to purchase $161,000 of securities and received $195,000 on CDs that have matured.  Purchases of capital consumed $38,000 of cash during the three month period ended December 31, 2010.

Financing Activities

For the three-month period ended December 31, 2011 we received $70,000 from employees’ participation and purchase of stock through our ESPP and $38,000 from the issuance of stock as a result of employees exercising options.

For the three month period ended December 31, 2010 we received $38,000 from employees’ participation and purchase of stock through our ESPP and received $11,000 from the issuance of stock as a result of employees exercising options.

10

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management utilizes its technical knowledge, cumulative business experience, judgment and other factors in the selection and application of the Company’s accounting policies. The accounting policies considered by management to be the most critical to the presentation of the financial statements because they require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, accruals for uncertain tax positions, and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets.

These accounting policies are described in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.  Management made no changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies during the quarter ended December 31, 2011.

In applying its critical accounting policies, management reassesses its estimates each reporting period based on available information. Changes in these estimates did not have a significant impact on earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2011.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (Topic 820)—Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04), to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2012 and should be applied prospectively. Our adoption of ASU 2011-04 became effective the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and had no material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective for us beginning after December 15, 2012 and should be applied retrospectively. We do not believe ASU 2011-05 will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)—Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which is intended to simplify how entities test for goodwill impairment  by permitting an entity the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The standard will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairments tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of ASU 2011-08 became effective the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and had no material impact on our financial statements.

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM  4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

11

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes  to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is exposed to a number of asserted and unasserted legal claims encountered in the ordinary course of business.  Although the outcome of any such legal action cannot be predicted, management believes that there are no pending legal proceedings against or involving the Company for which the outcome is likely to have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

The most significant risk factors applicable to the Company are described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit 31.1 – Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act

Exhibit 31.2 – Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act

Exhibit 32.1 – Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

12

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CLEARFIELD, INC.

January 27, 2012	/s/ Cheryl P. Beranek
	By: Cheryl P. Beranek Its:  President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
January 27, 2012	/s/ Daniel Herzog
	By:  Daniel Herzog Its:  Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

13

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Cheryl P. Beranek, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Clearfield, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

January 27, 2012	/s/ Cheryl P. Beranek
	By: Cheryl P. Beranek, President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel Herzog, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Clearfield, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

January 27, 2012	/s/ Daniel Herzog
	Daniel Herzog, Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2011 of Clearfield, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

January 27, 2012	/s/ Cheryl P. Beranek
	By: Cheryl P. Beranek, President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

January 27, 2012	/s/ Daniel Herzog
	Daniel Herzog, Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

XML

Note 4 - Stock Based Compensation

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block]

Note 4.  Stock Based Compensation

The Company recorded $112,153 of compensation expense related to current and past option grants, restricted stock grants and the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011.  The Company recorded $58,287 of compensation expense related to current and past equity awards for the three-month period ended December 31, 2010.  This expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense.  There was no tax benefit from recording this non-cash expense.  As of December 31, 2011, $1,021,887 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 5.6 years.

We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted average fair value of options during the three-month period ended December 31, 2010.  The weighted-average fair values at the grant date for options issued during the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $1.92. This fair value was estimated at grant date using the weighted-average assumptions listed below.

	Three months ended December 31, 2010
Dividend yield		0	%
Expected volatility		74.17	%
Average risk-free interest rate		1.58	%
Expected life	6 years
Vesting period	3 years

During the three month period ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not grant any incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted key employees incentive stock options to purchase an aggregate of 5,000 shares of common stock with a contractual term of 7 years, a three year vesting term and an exercise price of $3.00 with a fair value of $1.92 per share.

During the three month period ended December 31, 2011, exercised stock options totaled 46,106 shares, resulting in $37,681 of proceeds to the Company. During the three month period ended December 31, 2010, exercised stock options totaled 7,132 shares, resulting in $10,530 of proceeds to the Company.

The expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock for a period approximating the expected life. The expected life represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding after their grant date. The risk-free interest rate reflects the interest rate at grant date on zero-coupon U.S. governmental bonds having a remaining life similar to the expected option term.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Clearfield, Inc.’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) allows participating employees to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount through payroll deductions. The ESPP is available to all employees subject to certain eligibility requirements. Terms of the ESPP provide that participating employees may purchase the Company’s common stock on a voluntary after-tax basis. Employees may purchase the Company’s common stock at a price that is no less than the lower of 85% of the fair market value of one share of common stock at the beginning or end of each stock purchase period or phase. The ESPP is carried out in six-month phases, with phases beginning on January 1 and July 1 of each calendar year. For the phases that ended on December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, employees purchased 11,267 and 17,710 shares at a price of $6.24 and $2.13 per share, respectively. After the employee purchase on December 31, 2011, 256,504 shares of common stock were available for future purchase under the ESPP.

XML

Note 3 - Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Note  3. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

The Company currently invests its excess cash in money market accounts and bank certificates of deposit (CDs) with a term of not more than three years. CDs with original maturities of more than three months are reported as held-to-maturity investments and are carried at amortized cost. The maturity dates of the Company’s CDs at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 are as follows:

	December 31, 2011		September 30, 2010
Less than one year	$	3,878,000		$	1,849,000
1-3 years		5,314,000			2,707,000
Total	$	9,192,000		$	4,445,000

XML

Condensed Balance Sheets Unaudited (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 7,375,003	$ 11,281,027
Short-term investments	3,878,000	1,849,000
Accounts receivable, net	2,026,758	3,228,864
Inventories	2,528,067	2,757,151
Deferred taxes	994,000	994,000
Other current assets	228,551	170,243
Total Current Assets	17,030,379	20,280,285
Property, plant and equipment, net	930,690	986,031
Long-term investments	5,314,000	2,707,000
Goodwill	2,570,511	2,570,511
Deferred taxes –long term	3,537,692	3,558,797
Other	199,467	199,467
Total other assets	11,621,670	9,035,775
Total Assets	29,582,739	30,302,091
Accounts payable	969,756	1,439,611
Accrued compensation	1,035,146	2,465,132
Accrued expenses	72,726	106,383
Total current liabilities	2,077,628	4,011,126
Deferred rent	56,202	61,794
Total Liabilities	2,133,830	4,072,920
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 500 shares; no shares outstanding
Common stock, authorized 50,000,000, $.01 par value; 12,326,233 and 12,270,691, shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011	123,262	122,707
Additional paid-in capital	53,621,722	53,402,138
Accumulated deficit	(26,296,075)	(27,295,674)
Total Shareholders’ Equity	27,448,909	26,229,171
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$ 29,582,739	$ 30,302,091

XML

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Basis of Accounting [Text Block]

Note 1.  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Pursuant to these rules and regulations, certain financial information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements have been condensed or omitted.  However, in the opinion of management, the financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows of the interim periods presented. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year or for any other interim period, due to variability in customer purchasing patterns and seasonal, operating and other factors. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.

In preparation of the Company’s financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

XML

Note 2 - Net Income Per Share

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

Note 2.  Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted EPS equals net income divided by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus all additional common stock equivalents, such as stock options, when dilutive.

	Three Months Ended December 31
	2011		2010
Net income per common share — basic:
Net income	$	999,599	$	501,158
Weighted average shares outstanding basic		12,299,554		12,019,289
Net income per common share	$	0.08	$	0.04
Net income per common share — diluted
Net income	$	999,599	$	501,158
Weighted average shares outstanding		12,299,554		12,019,289
Dilutive impact of common stock equivalent outstanding		426,739		610,654
Weighted average shares outstanding— diluted		12,726,293		12,629,943
Net income per common share — diluted	$	0.08	$	0.04

XML

Condensed Balance Sheets Unaudited (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011
Preferred stock, par value (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	500	500
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, par value (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares issued	12,326,233	12,270,691
Common stock, shares outstanding	12,326,233	12,270,691

XML

Document And Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Jan. 20, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Clearfield, Inc.
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--09-30
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		12,326,233
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0000796505
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

Condensed Statements Of Operations Unaudited (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Revenues	$ 9,165,201	$ 7,246,669
Cost of sales	5,370,919	4,280,716
Gross profit	3,794,282	2,965,953
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative	2,773,114	2,459,319
Income from operations	1,021,168	506,634
Other income
Interest income	27,182	29,508
Other income		500
	27,182	30,008
Income before income taxes	1,048,350	536,642
Income tax expense	48,751	35,484
Net income	$ 999,599	$ 501,158
Net income per share:
Basic (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.08	$ 0.04
Diluted (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.08	$ 0.04
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic (in Shares)	12,299,554	12,019,289
Diluted (in Shares)	12,726,293	12,629,943

XML

Note 7 - Major Customer Concentration

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Concentration Risk, Customer

Note 7.  Major Customer Concentration

One customer, Power & Telephone Supply Company (Power & Tel) who serves as a reseller of the Company’s product to a range of Tier 2 and Tier 3 Telco carriers as well as cable service operators, comprised approximately 25% and 27% of total sales for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

At December 31, 2011, two customers accounted for 23% of accounts receivable.  KGP Logistics, Inc., (KGP)  a reseller, accounted for 13% and Power & Tel accounted for 10%.  At December 31, 2010, Power & Tel accounted for 29% of accounts receivable.  KGP’s sales did not exceed 10% of total sales for the three months ended December 31, 2011 or 2010. Power & Tel and KGP purchase our product through a standard form of purchase order.

XML

Note 6 - Facilities

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Real Estate Owned [Text Block]

Note 6.  Facilities

 During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received and accepted a purchase offer on its Aberdeen, South Dakota facility.  The Company had not occupied the facility since fiscal year 2006.  In June 2011, the Company completed the sale of the facility and land in the amount of $725,000. The final proceeds to the Company after transaction costs were $660,000. The Company recorded a gain on the sale of these assets of approximately $37,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. 

XML

Note 10 - Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

New Accounting Pronouncement or Change in Accounting Principle, Description

Note 10.  Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (Topic 820)—Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04), to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2012 and should be applied prospectively. Our adoption of ASU 2011-04 became effective the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and had no material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective for us beginning after December 15, 2012 and should be applied retrospectively.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)—Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which is intended to simplify how entities test for goodwill impairment  by permitting an entity the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The standard will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairments tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of ASU 2011-08 became effective the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and had no material impact on our financial statements.

XML

Note 8 - Goodwill and Patents

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 8. Goodwill and Patents

The Company analyzes its goodwill for impairment annually or at an interim period when events occur or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment.  The result of the analysis performed in the fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011 did not indicate an impairment of goodwill.  During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, there were no triggering events that indicate potential impairment exists.

The Company capitalizes legal costs incurred to obtain patents. Once accepted by either the U.S. Patent Office or the equivalent office of a foreign country, these legal costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining estimated lives, not exceeding 17 years. The Company currently has three patents pending with the U.S. Patent Office and in foreign countries.

XML

Note 9 - Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 9. Income Taxes

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of approximately $49,000 and $35,000, for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The Company’s tax provision includes estimated current federal alternative minimum taxes and state franchise taxes, but is primarily related to deferred tax expense related to book and income tax basis difference in goodwill on prior asset acquisitions.  Our year-to-date net change in valuation allowance is $373,000.   This change consists of $395,000 of tax benefit as a result of a reduction in valuation allowance after considering current financial condition and potential future taxable income.  This reduction is partially offset by a $22,000 increase  in valuation  allowance from the current year AMT tax credit generated as its utilization does not meet the “more likely than not” approach as required by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740.

As of September 30, 2011 the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards of approximately $27,278,000 and $22,090,000, respectively, which expire in fiscal years 2013 to 2028 if not utilized. In fiscal 2009, the Company completed an Internal Revenue Code Section 382 analysis of the loss carry-forwards and determined that all of its loss carry-forwards were utilizable and not restricted under Section 382.

Deferred taxes recognize the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of the assets and liabilities recorded for financial statement purposes and these amounts measured in accordance with tax laws. The Company’s realization of net operating loss carry-forward and other deferred tax temporary differences is contingent upon future taxable earnings. The Company reviewed its deferred tax asset for expected utilization using a “more likely than not” approach as required by ASC 740 by assessing the available positive and negative factors surrounding its recoverability.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company reversed a portion of its valuation allowance in consideration of all available positive and negative evidence, including our historical operating results, current financial condition, and potential future taxable income.  The reduction in the valuation allowance in the fourth quarter resulted in a non-cash income tax benefit of $2,481,000.  As of September 30, 2011, the Company had a remaining valuation allowance of approximately $6,042,000.

The Company future taxable income was evaluated based primarily on anticipated operating results from fiscal years 2012 through 2014.  The Company determined that projecting operating results beyond 2014 involves substantial uncertainty and the Company discounted forecasts beyond 2014 as a basis to support its deferred tax assets.  Based upon the assessment of all available evidence, the Company reversed a portion of its valuation allowance for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 in an amount in which the tax benefit generated offsets the tax provision to be realized from current year estimated taxable income.  The Company will continue to assess the assumptions it uses to determine the amount of its valuation allowance and may adjust the valuation allowance in future periods based on changes in assumptions of estimated future taxable income and other factors. If the valuation allowance is reduced, the Company would record an income tax benefit in the period in which that determination is made. If the valuation allowance is increased, we would record additional income tax expense. For the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has reduced its valuation allowance by approximately $373,000 and $217,000 respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, we do not have any unrecognized tax benefits.  It is the Company’s practice to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.  The Company does not expect any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.

XML

Condensed Statements Of Cash Flows Unaudited (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Net income	$ 999,599	$ 501,158
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	96,081	105,236
Deferred taxes	21,105	21,105
Loss on disposal of assets	21,081
Stock based compensation	112,153	58,287
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	1,202,106	925,045
Inventories	230,693	(92,949)
Prepaid expenses and other	(58,308)	3,045
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(1,939,090)	120,342
Net cash provided by operating activities	685,420	1,641,269
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(63,430)	(38,413)
Purchases of investments	(5,232,000)	(160,659)
Proceeds from maturities of investments	596,000	195,527
Net cash used in investing activities	(4,699,430)	(3,545)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan	70,305	37,722
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	37,681	10,530
Net cash provided by financing activities	107,986	48,252
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(3,906,024)	1,685,976
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	11,281,027	5,285,719
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$ 7,375,003	$ 6,971,695

XML

Note 5 - Inventories

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

Inventory Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 5.  Inventories

Inventories consist of the following as of:

	December 31, 2011		September 30, 2011
Raw materials	$	2,102,051	$	2,158,647
Work-in-progress		162,077		304,793
Finished goods		263,939		293,711
	$	2,528,067	$	2,757,151