XML 17 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value Disclosures
6 Months Ended
May 31, 2011
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures
8.  
Fair Value Disclosures
Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” provides a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities under GAAP and establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy can be summarized as follows:
  Level 1  
Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
  Level 2  
Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or other means.
 
  Level 3  
Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as pricing models, discounted cash flows, or similar techniques.
Fair value measurements are used for inventories on a nonrecurring basis when events and circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the six months ended May 31, 2011 and the year ended November 30, 2010 (in thousands):
                     
    Fair Value  
        May 31,     November 30,  
Description   Hierarchy   2011 (a)     2010 (a)  
 
                   
Long-lived assets held and used
  Level 2   $ 75     $ 1,877  
Long-lived assets held and used
  Level 3     28,709       9,693  
 
               
 
                   
Total
      $ 28,784     $ 11,570  
 
               
     
(a)  
Amount represents the aggregate fair values for land parcels or communities for which the Company recognized inventory impairment charges during the reporting period, as of the date that the fair value measurements were made. The carrying value for these land parcels and communities may have subsequently increased or decreased from the fair value reflected due to activity that has occurred since the measurement date.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 360, long-lived assets held and used with a carrying value of $49.9 million were written down to their fair value of $28.8 million during the six months ended May 31, 2011, resulting in inventory impairment charges of $21.1 million. Long-lived assets held and used with a carrying value of $21.4 million were written down to their fair value of $11.6 million during the year ended November 30, 2010, resulting in inventory impairment charges of $9.8 million.
The fair values for long-lived assets held and used that were determined using Level 2 inputs were based on an executed contract. The fair values for long-lived assets held and used that were determined using Level 3 inputs were primarily based on the estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each asset. These discounted cash flows are impacted by: the risk-free rate of return; expected risk premium based on estimated land development, construction and delivery timelines; market risk from potential future price erosion; cost uncertainty due to development or construction cost increases; and other risks specific to the asset or conditions in the market in which the asset is located at the time the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each land parcel or community and may vary among land parcels or communities.
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, mortgages and notes receivable, senior notes, and mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans. Fair value measurements of financial instruments are determined by various market data and other valuation techniques as appropriate. When available, the Company uses quoted market prices in active markets to determine fair value.
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, except those for which the carrying values approximate fair values (in thousands):
                                 
    May 31, 2011     November 30, 2010  
    Carrying     Estimated     Carrying     Estimated  
    Value     Fair Value     Value     Fair Value  
 
                               
Financial Liabilities:
                               
Senior notes due 2011 at 6 3/8%
  $ 99,977     $ 100,514     $ 99,916     $ 101,500  
Senior notes due 2014 at 5 3/4%
    249,571       251,253       249,498       246,250  
Senior notes due 2015 at 5 7/8%
    299,169       291,034       299,068       289,500  
Senior notes due 2015 at 6 1/4%
    449,770       436,484       449,745       435,375  
Senior notes due 2017 at 9.1%
    260,603       273,588       260,352       279,575  
Senior notes due 2018 at 7 1/4%
    298,949       282,073       298,893       286,500  
The fair values of the Company’s senior notes are estimated based on quoted market prices.
The carrying amounts reported for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, mortgages and notes receivable, and mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans approximate fair values.