XML 121 R97.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
Schedule of impairment (Details)
¥ in Thousands, $ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
CNY (¥)
Dec. 31, 2020
CNY (¥)
IfrsStatementLineItems [Line Items]      
Expected credit loss rate 26.00% 26.00% 18.00%
Gross carrying amount   ¥ 68,641 ¥ 75,141
Impairment allowances $ 2,771 ¥ 17,614 ¥ 13,774
Within 1 year [Member]      
IfrsStatementLineItems [Line Items]      
Expected credit loss rate 6.00% 6.00% 5.00%
Gross carrying amount   ¥ 16,311 ¥ 7,273
Impairment allowances $ 150 ¥ 955 ¥ 352
1-2 years [Member]      
IfrsStatementLineItems [Line Items]      
Expected credit loss rate 26.00% 26.00% 12.00%
Gross carrying amount   ¥ 6,865 ¥ 22,826
Impairment allowances $ 277 ¥ 1,759 ¥ 2,701 [1]
2-3 years [Member]      
IfrsStatementLineItems [Line Items]      
Expected credit loss rate 13.00% 13.00% 11.00%
Gross carrying amount   ¥ 14,712 ¥ 21,043
Impairment allowances $ 301 ¥ 1,916 [2] ¥ 2,249 [2]
Over 3 years [Member]      
IfrsStatementLineItems [Line Items]      
Expected credit loss rate 48.00% 48.00% 45.00%
Gross carrying amount   ¥ 27,083 ¥ 18,833
Impairment allowances $ 2,043 12,984 [3] 8,472 [3]
Current [member]      
IfrsStatementLineItems [Line Items]      
Gross carrying amount   ¥ 3,670 ¥ 5,166
[1] The impairment allowances included an amount of CNY221 (as adjusted) as of December 31, 2020, for specific trade receivables which were considered to be in default due to conditions which indicated that the Group was unlikely to receive the outstanding contractual amounts in full.
[2] The impairment allowances included CNY1,035 (as adjusted) and CNY221 as of December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively, for specific trade receivables which were considered to be in default due to conditions which indicated that the Group was unlikely to receive the outstanding contractual amounts in full.
[3] The impairment allowances included an amount of CNY5,055 (as adjusted) and CNY4,646 as of December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively, for specific trade receivables which were considered to be in default due to conditions which indicated that the Group was unlikely to receive the outstanding contractual amounts in full.