N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT

INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number        811-04656                

                                 Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.                            

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

One Corporate Center

                             Rye, New York 10580-1422                            

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

James A. Dinsmore

Gabelli Funds, LLC

One Corporate Center

                                 Rye, New York 10580-1422                                

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-800-422-3554

Date of fiscal year end:   September 30

Date of reporting period:  September 30, 2018

Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

The Report to Shareholders is attached herewith.

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Annual Report — September 30, 2018

(Y)our Portfolio Management Team

To Our Shareholders,

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the net asset value (NAV) total return of the Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. was 13.8%, compared with total returns of 12.2% and 6.8% for the ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Convertibles Index and the Bloomberg Barclays Balanced U.S. Convertibles Index, respectively. The total return for the Fund’s publicly traded shares was 17.1%. The Fund’s NAV per share was $11.07, while the price of the publicly traded shares closed at $10.31 on the NYSE American. See below for additional performance information.

Enclosed are the financial statements, including the schedule of investments, as of September 30, 2018.

Comparative Results

Average Annual Returns through September 30, 2018 (a)(b) (Unaudited)

													Since Inception
	1 Year			3 Year			5 Year			10 Year			(06/30/86)
Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.
NAV Total Return (c)		13.85	%		11.78	%		8.98	%		9.73	%		8.14%
Investment Total Return (d)		17.08			17.31			12.25			12.61			8.58
ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Convertibles Index		12.22			11.83			9.32			11.01			N/A(e)
Bloomberg Barclays Balanced U.S. Convertibles Index		6.81			7.41			4.63			7.86			N/A(f)
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index		17.91			17.31			13.95			11.97			10.37

(a) Returns represent past performance and do not guarantee future results. Investment returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. The Fund’s use of leverage may magnify the volatility of net asset value changes versus funds that do not employ leverage. When shares are sold, they may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data presented. Visit www.gabelli.com for performance information as of the most recent month end. Returns would have been lower had Gabelli Funds, LLC (the Adviser) not reimbursed certain expenses of the Fund. Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the Fund before investing. The ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Convertibles Index is a market value weighted index of all dollar denominated convertible securities that are exchangeable into U.S. equities and have a market value of more than $50 million. The Bloomberg Barclays Balanced U.S. Convertibles Index is a market value weighted index that tracks the performance of publicly placed, dollar denominated convertible securities that are between 40% and 80% sensitive to movements in their underlying common stocks. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged indicator of stock market performance. Dividends and interest income are considered reinvested. You cannot invest directly in an index.

(b) The Fund’s fiscal year ends on September 30.

(c) Total returns and average annual returns reflect changes in the NAV per share, reinvestment of distributions at NAV on the ex-dividend date for the period beginning November 2015, and are net of expenses. Total returns and average annual returns were not adjusted for the 2004 rights offering. For the period from December 2008 through October 2015, the distributions were reinvested on the payable date using market prices. From inception through November 2008, distributions were reinvested on the payable date using NAV. Since inception return is based on an initial NAV of $9.30.

(d) Total returns and average annual returns reflect changes in closing market values on the NYSE American and reinvestment of distributions. Total returns and average annual returns were not adjusted for the 2004 rights offering. Since inception return is based on an initial offering price of $10.00.

(e) The ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Convertibles Index inception date is December 31, 1994.

(f) The Bloomberg Barclays Balanced U.S. Convertibles Index inception date is January 1, 2003.

Summary of Portfolio Holdings (Unaudited)

The following table presents portfolio holdings as a percent of total investments as of September 30, 2018:

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Computer Software and Services	17.6	%
Health Care	16.3	%
Financial Services	8.7	%
Semiconductors	8.2	%
Energy and Utilities	8.1	%
Real Estate	7.6	%
Telecommunications	4.7	%
Diversified Industrial	4.7	%
Consumer Services	4.4	%
U.S. Government Obligations	4.0	%
Business Services	3.5	%
Communications Equipment	2.4	%

Aerospace	1.9	%
Food and Beverage	1.9	%
Building and Construction	1.2	%
Transportation	1.1	%
Entertainment	1.1	%
Consumer Products	0.8	%
Cable and Satellite	0.7	%
Automotive	0.6	%
Agriculture	0.5	%
	100.0	%

The Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain this information at www.gabelli.com or by calling the Fund at 800-GABELLI (800- 422- 3554). The Fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.

Proxy Voting

The Fund files Form N-PX with its complete proxy voting record for the twelve months ended June 30, no later than August 31 of each year. A description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies, procedures, and how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by (i) calling 800-GABELLI (800-422-3554); (ii) writing to The Gabelli Funds at One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580-1422; or (iii) visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Certifications

The Fund’s Chief Executive Officer has certified to the NYSE American that, as of June 8, 2018, he was not aware of any violation by the Fund of applicable NYSE American corporate governance listing standards. The Fund reports to the SEC on Form N-CSR which contains certifications by the Fund’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that relate to the Fund’s disclosure in such reports and that are required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act.

2

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Schedule of Investments — September 30, 2018

Principal Amount			Cost		Market Value
		CONVERTIBLE CORPORATE BONDS — 57.9%
		Aerospace — 1.9%
$	1,000,000	Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc.,
		2.250%, 12/15/23	$	1,028,009	$	1,429,795
	1,638,000	Kaman Corp.,
		3.250%, 05/01/24		1,655,383		1,927,559
				2,683,392		3,357,354
		Automotive — 0.6%
	1,000,000	Tesla Inc.,
		1.250%, 03/01/21		929,459		958,750
		Business Services — 1.5%
	1,000,000	Perficient Inc.,
		2.375%, 09/15/23(a)		1,000,000		949,000
	1,000,000	Q2 Holdings Inc.,
		0.750%, 02/15/23(a)		1,097,572		1,184,325
	400,000	RingCentral Inc.,
		Zero Coupon, 03/15/23(a)		400,000		503,567
				2,497,572		2,636,892
		Cable and Satellite — 0.7%
	1,525,000	Global Eagle Entertainment Inc.,
		2.750%, 02/15/35		1,016,876		1,166,535
		Communications Equipment — 2.4%
	1,000,000	Harmonic Inc.,
		4.000%, 12/01/20		1,000,000		1,144,800
	2,000,000	InterDigital Inc.,
		1.500%, 03/01/20		2,028,788		2,350,308
	524,000	Vocera Communications Inc.,
		1.500%, 05/15/23(a)		563,221		661,688
				3,592,009		4,156,796
		Computer Software and Services — 15.0%
	1,195,000	Apptio Inc.,
		0.875%, 04/01/23(a)		1,204,842		1,346,907
	1,000,000	Coupa Software Inc.,
		0.375%, 01/15/23(a)		1,140,827		1,827,087
	2,500,000	CSG Systems International Inc.,
		4.250%, 03/15/36		2,583,502		2,633,365
	235,000	DocuSign Inc.,
		0.500%, 09/15/23(a)		235,000		234,647
	697,000	GDS Holdings Ltd.,
		2.000%, 06/01/25(a)		647,140		643,924
	2,002,000	IAC FinanceCo. Inc.,
		0.875%, 10/01/22(a)		2,255,259		2,980,514
	2,135,000	Lumentum Holdings Inc.,
		0.250%, 03/15/24		2,201,573		2,566,328
		MercadoLibre Inc.,
	750,000	2.250%, 07/01/19		769,057		2,026,402
	1,184,000	2.000%, 08/15/28(a)		1,184,000		1,170,363
	1,795,000	New Relic Inc.,
		0.500%, 05/01/23(a)		1,872,806		1,917,625

Principal Amount			Cost		Market Value
$	1,032,000	Nice Systems Inc.,
		1.250%, 01/15/24	$	1,077,592	$	1,480,275
	1,599,000	Nutanix Inc.,
		Zero Coupon, 01/15/23(a)		1,612,858		1,773,422
	812,000	Okta Inc.,
		0.250%, 02/15/23(a)		835,685		1,258,766
	1,700,000	PROS Holdings Inc.,
		2.000%, 06/01/47		1,505,522		1,669,859
	995,000	Pure Storage Inc.,
		0.125%, 04/15/23(a)		995,000		1,155,048
	1,174,000	Splunk Inc.,
		1.125%, 09/15/25(a)		1,174,000		1,214,931
				21,294,663		25,899,463
		Consumer Services — 4.4%
	1,500,000	Extra Space Storage LP,
		3.125%, 10/01/35(a)		1,524,514		1,591,395
	1,600,000	Quotient Technology Inc.,
		1.750%, 12/01/22(a)		1,633,088		1,783,019
	1,500,000	Square Inc.,
		0.500%, 05/15/23(a)		1,685,545		2,128,524
	1,695,000	Team Inc.,
		5.000%, 08/01/23		1,638,543		2,139,937
				6,481,690		7,642,875
		Diversified Industrial — 2.4%
	750,000	Chart Industries Inc.,
		1.000%, 11/15/24(a)		752,735		1,070,663
	2,000,000	Knowles Corp.,
		3.250%, 11/01/21		2,072,003		2,288,000
	500,000	TimkenSteel Corp.,
		6.000%, 06/01/21		506,486		713,163
				3,331,224		4,071,826
		Energy and Utilities — 3.7%
	1,900,000	Cheniere Energy Inc.,
		4.250%, 03/15/45		1,266,307		1,533,536
	1,500,000	Chesapeake Energy Corp.,
		5.500%, 09/15/26		1,508,344		1,485,371
	258,000	Goodrich Petroleum Escrow Bond, Zero Coupon,
		12/31/21†(a)(b)(c)(d)		0		0
	667,000	Newpark Resources Inc.,
		4.000%, 12/01/21(a)		702,045		888,017
	2,850,000	SunPower Corp.,
		4.000%, 01/15/23		2,411,118		2,398,802
				5,887,814		6,305,726
		Entertainment — 0.6%
	1,000,000	Gannett Co. Inc.,
		4.750%, 04/15/24(a)		1,106,316		1,047,947

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

3

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Schedule of Investments (Continued) — September 30, 2018

Principal Amount			Cost		Market Value
		CONVERTIBLE CORPORATE BONDS (Continued)
		Financial Services — 1.5%
$	795,000	Encore Capital Europe Finance Ltd.,
		4.500%, 09/01/23	$	801,716	$	815,334
	1,000,000	Encore Capital Group Inc.,
		3.000%, 07/01/20		903,029		1,006,999
	641,000	LendingTree Inc.,
		0.625%, 06/01/22		650,922		815,934
				2,355,667		2,638,267
		Health Care — 12.0%
	875,000	ANI Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
		3.000%, 12/01/19		908,626		929,793
	550,000	Array BioPharma Inc.,
		2.625%, 12/01/24(a)		635,807		695,501
	1,300,000	BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.,
		0.599%, 08/01/24		1,278,137		1,388,728
	1,350,000	Exact Sciences Corp.,
		1.000%, 01/15/25		1,419,364		1,671,469
	250,000	Horizon Pharma Investment Ltd.,
		2.500%, 03/15/22		283,058		252,413
	1,080,000	Insulet Corp.,
		1.375%, 11/15/24(a)		1,194,444		1,368,096
	1,083,000	Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
		3.250%, 07/01/23		1,097,067		1,099,922
	500,000	Invacare Corp.,
		4.500%, 06/01/22		502,894		566,592
	1,171,000	Neurocrine Biosciences Inc.,
		2.250%, 05/15/24		1,211,779		1,998,991
	1,000,000	NuVasive Inc.,
		2.250%, 03/15/21		1,035,094		1,269,374
	1,500,000	Pacira Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
		2.375%, 04/01/22		1,528,863		1,589,994
	1,000,000	Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
		4.750%, 05/01/24(a)		992,135		948,750
	400,000	Retrophin Inc.,
		2.500%, 09/15/25		407,122		411,758
	1,000,000	Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
		0.625%, 04/01/23(a)		1,094,375		1,123,215
	1,500,000	Teladoc Health Inc.,
		3.000%, 12/15/22		1,557,468		3,068,913
	1,250,000	Teligent Inc.,
		3.750%, 12/15/19		1,247,553		1,196,875
	1,000,000	Theravance Biopharma Inc.,
		3.250%, 11/01/23		1,000,000		1,180,251
				17,393,786		20,760,635
		Semiconductors — 7.4%
	500,000	Advanced Micro Devices Inc.,
		2.125%, 09/01/26		513,183		1,942,275
	1,500,000	Cypress Semiconductor Corp.,
		4.500%, 01/15/22		1,615,150		1,888,761

Principal Amount			Cost		Market Value
$	2,250,000	Inphi Corp.,
		1.125%, 12/01/20	$	2,415,083	$	2,603,749
	1,000,000	Microchip Technology Inc.,
		1.625%, 02/15/27		998,020		1,068,224
	1,500,000	NXP Semiconductors NV,
		1.000%, 12/01/19		1,665,790		1,565,593
	1,159,000	Rambus Inc.,
		1.375%, 02/01/23(a)		1,167,157		1,045,335
	1,180,000	Silicon Laboratories Inc.,
		1.375%, 03/01/22		1,220,592		1,351,288
	1,000,000	Teradyne Inc.,
		1.250%, 12/15/23		1,029,444		1,301,452
				10,624,419		12,766,677
		Telecommunications — 2.7%
	1,700,000	Infinera Corp.,
		2.125%, 09/01/24		1,698,296		1,724,495
	2,192,000	Twilio Inc.,
		0.250%, 06/01/23(a)		2,195,521		2,957,791
				3,893,817		4,682,286
		Transportation — 1.1%
	1,700,000	Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc.,
		2.250%, 06/01/22		1,699,094		1,968,556
		TOTAL CONVERTIBLE CORPORATE BONDS		84,787,798		100,060,585
Shares
		CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKS — 2.8%
		Agriculture — 0.5%
	7,500	Bunge Ltd., 4.875%		726,780		813,750
		Business Services — 0.3%
	711,039	Amerivon Holdings LLC,
		4.000% (b)		1,294,693		433,734
	272,728	Amerivon Holdings LLC, common equity units (b)		0		16,364
				1,294,693		450,098
		Financial Services — 1.2%
	1,000	Bank of America Corp.,
		7.250%		1,125,153		1,294,250
	583	Wells Fargo & Co.,
		7.500%		546,843		752,583
				1,671,996		2,046,833
		Food and Beverage — 0.8%
	8,000	Post Holdings Inc.,
		2.500%		1,192,236		1,454,668
		TOTAL CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKS		4,885,705		4,765,349

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Schedule of Investments (Continued) — September 30, 2018

Shares			Cost		Market Value
		MANDATORY CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES (e) — 14.8%
		Building and Construction — 1.2%
	18,778	Stanley Black & Decker Inc.,
		5.375%, 05/15/20	$	2,049,817	$	2,058,257
		Computer Software and Services — 0.7%
	10,000	MTS Systems Corp.,
		8.750%, 07/01/19		1,119,226		1,198,130
		Diversified Industrial — 2.3%
	31,316	International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.,
		6.000%, 09/15/21		1,620,604		1,800,670
	35,100	Rexnord Corp.,
		5.750%, 11/15/19		1,842,160		2,281,500
				3,462,764		4,082,170
		Energy and Utilities — 3.8%
	7,800	CenterPoint Energy Inc.,
		7.000%, 09/01/21		390,000		393,822
	20,000	Dominion Energy, Inc.,
		6.750%, 08/15/19		973,596		946,000
	18,600	DTE Energy Co.,
		6.500%, 10/01/19		977,476		961,992
	21,666	Hess Corp.,
		8.000%, 02/01/19		1,148,425		1,722,014
		Sempra Energy,
	5,383	6.000%, 01/15/21		548,300		542,822
	5,000	6.750%, 07/15/21		508,649		503,975
	25,890	South Jersey Industries Inc.,
		7.250%, 04/15/21		1,358,076		1,444,921
				5,904,522		6,515,546
		Financial Services — 4.5%
	10,000	2017 Mandatory Exchangeable Trust,
		5.188%, 12/01/20		1,000,000		1,179,000
	20,000	Alibaba - Mandatory Exchange Trust,
		5.750%, 06/01/19 (a)		2,130,000		3,707,500
	14,938	Assurant Inc.,
		6.500%, 03/15/21		1,534,954		1,681,421
	24,000	New York Community Capital Trust V,
		6.000%, 11/01/51		1,043,554		1,182,000
				5,708,508		7,749,921

Shares			Cost		Market Value
		Health Care — 1.4%
	36,573	Becton Dickinson and Co.,
		6.125%, 05/01/20	$	1,951,948	$	2,390,411
		Real Estate — 0.9%
	15,000	QTS Realty Trust Inc.,
		6.500%, (f)		1,500,000		1,584,150
		TOTAL MANDATORY CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES		21,696,785		25,578,585
		COMMON STOCKS — 20.5%
		Business Services — 1.7%
	5,000	Alliance Data Systems Corp.		1,070,395		1,180,800
	20,000	PayPal Holdings Inc.†		818,351		1,756,800
				1,888,746		2,937,600
		Computer Software and Services — 1.9%
	14,300	Microsoft Corp.		388,674		1,635,491
	15,925	Proofpoint Inc.†		1,289,136		1,693,305
				1,677,810		3,328,796
		Consumer Products — 0.8%
	24,000	Unilever NV		1,015,518		1,333,200
		Energy and Utilities — 0.6%
	8,000	Chevron Corp.		871,279		978,240
	91	Goodrich Petroleum Corp.†		915		1,278
				872,194		979,518
		Entertainment — 0.5%
	7,500	The Walt Disney Co.		227,391		877,050
		Financial Services — 1.5%
	9,546	Citigroup Inc.		536,671		684,830
	50,000	Huntington Bancshares Inc.		743,524		746,000
	36,434	Synchrony Financial		1,003,121		1,132,369
				2,283,316		2,563,199
		Food and Beverage — 1.1%
	30,000	B&G Foods Inc.		853,242		823,500
	30,000	Conagra Brands Inc.		744,389		1,019,100
				1,597,631		1,842,600
		Health Care — 2.9%
	15,000	Eli Lilly & Co.		800,268		1,609,650
	22,651	Merck & Co. Inc.		839,335		1,606,862
	40,000	Pfizer Inc.		923,760		1,762,800
				2,563,363		4,979,312
		Real Estate — 6.7%
	15,000	American Tower Corp., REIT		1,342,800		2,179,500
	16,100	Crown Castle International Corp., REIT		1,276,059		1,792,413
	7,000	Equinix Inc., REIT		1,828,368		3,030,230
	58,700	Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc., REIT		899,407		928,634

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

5

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Schedule of Investments (Continued) — September 30, 2018

Shares			Cost		Market Value
		COMMON STOCKS (Continued)
		Real Estate (Continued)
	15,000	SBA Communications Corp., REIT†	$	1,470,771	$	2,409,450
	20,000	Welltower Inc., REIT		1,121,190		1,286,400
				7,938,595		11,626,627
		Semiconductors — 0.8%
	30,000	Intel Corp.		742,000		1,418,700
		Telecommunications — 2.0%
	30,000	AT&T Inc.		829,600		1,007,400
	16,119	T-Mobile US Inc.†		573,400		1,131,231
	25,000	Verizon Communications Inc.		937,353		1,334,750
				2,340,353		3,473,381
		TOTAL COMMON STOCKS		23,146,917		35,359,983
		WARRANTS — 0.0%
		Energy and Utilities — 0.0%
	781	Goodrich Petroleum Corp., expire 10/12/26†(b)		0		0
Principal Amount
		U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS — 4.0%
$	6,935,000	U.S. Treasury Bills,
		2.113% to 2.135%††,
		12/13/18 to 12/20/18		6,903,548		6,903,439
	TOTAL INVESTMENTS — 100.0%		$	141,420,753	$	172,667,941

	Market Value
Other Assets and Liabilities (Net)	$	524,060
PREFERRED STOCK
(1,200,000 preferred shares outstanding)		(30,000,000	)
NET ASSETS
(12,934,886 common shares outstanding)	$	143,192,001
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
($143,192,001 ÷ 12,934,886 shares outstanding)	$	11.07

(a) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At September 30, 2018, the market value of Rule 144A securities amounted to $39,177,567 or 22.69% of total investments.

(b) Security is valued using significant unobservable inputs and is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

(c) At September 30, 2018, the Fund held investments in restricted and illiquid securities amounting to $0 or 0.00% of the Fund’s total investments, which were valued under methods approved by the Board of Trustees as follows:

Acquisition Principal Amount	Issuer	Acquisition Date	Acquisition Cost	9/30/18 Carrying Value Per Bond
$258,000	Goodrich Petroleum Escrow Bond, Zero Coupon, 12/31/21	12/14/16	$0		$0

(d) Security in default.

(e) Mandatory convertible securities are required to be converted on the dates listed; they generally may be converted prior to these dates at the option of the holder.

(f) Security is perpetual and has no stated maturity date.

† Non-income producing security.

†† Represents annualized yields at dates of purchase.

REIT  Real Estate Investment Trust

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

6

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

September 30, 2018

Assets:
Investments, at value (cost $141,420,753)	$	172,667,941
Cash		9,121
Receivable for investments sold		401,881
Dividends and interest receivable		635,232
Deferred offering expense		114,239
Prepaid expenses		623
Total Assets		173,829,037
Liabilities:
Distributions payable		21,875
Payable for investments purchased		390,000
Payable for investment advisory fees		98,783
Payable for payroll expenses		30,330
Payable for accounting fees		3,750
Other accrued expenses		92,298
Total Liabilities		637,036
Preferred Shares:
Series A Cumulative Preferred Shares (5.250%, $25 liquidation value, $0.01 par value, unlimited shares authorized with 1,200,000 shares issued and outstanding)		30,000,000
Net Assets Attributable to Common Shareholders	$	143,192,001
Net Assets Attributable to Common Shareholders Consist of:
Paid-in capital	$	110,572,758
Total distributable earnings(a)		32,619,243
Net Assets	$	143,192,001
Net Asset Value per Common Share:
($143,192,001 ÷ 12,934,886 shares outstanding at $0.01 par value; unlimited number of shares authorized)		$11.07

(a) Effective September 30, 2018, the Fund has adopted disclosure requirements conforming to SEC Rule 6-04.17 of Regulation S-X and discloses total distributable earnings. See Note 2 for further details.

Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended September 30, 2018

Investment Income:
Dividends (net of foreign withholding taxes of $6,476)	$	2,253,226
Interest		1,588,027
Total Investment Income		3,841,253
Expenses:
Investment advisory fees		1,166,067
Trustees’ fees		126,500
Shareholder communications expenses		78,500
Payroll expenses		76,387
Legal and audit fees		55,587
Accounting fees		45,000
Shareholder services fees		29,693
Custodian fees		13,059
Interest expense		75
Miscellaneous expenses		15,919
Total Expenses		1,606,787
Expenses paid indirectly by broker (See Note 3)		(708	)
Net Expenses		1,606,079
Net Investment Income		2,235,174
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on Investments:
Net realized gain on investments		6,785,382
Net change in unrealized appreciation:
on investments		10,367,898
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on Investments		17,153,280
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations		19,388,454
Total Distributions to Preferred Shareholders		(1,575,000	)
Net Increase in Net Assets Attributable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Operations	$	17,813,454

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

7

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Statement of Changes in Net Assets Attributable to Common Shareholders

	Year Ended September 30, 2018				Year Ended September 30, 2017
Operations:
Net investment income		$	2,235,174			$	2,435,018
Net realized gain on investments			6,785,382				3,511,086
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments			10,367,898				8,350,640
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations			19,388,454				14,296,744
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders			(1,575,000	)			(56,875	)*
Distributions to Common Shareholders			(6,201,526	)			(5,665,805	)**
Total Distributions(a)			(7,776,526	)			(5,722,680	)
Fund Share Transactions:
Net increase in net assets from common shares issued upon reinvestment of distributions			604,486				646,865
Net decrease from repurchase of common shares			—				(1,005,727	)
Offering costs for preferred shares charged to paid-in capital			(39,619	)			(1,105,000	)
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets from Fund Share Transactions			564,867				(1,463,862	)
Net Increase in Net Assets Attributable to Common Shareholders			12,176,795				7,110,202
Net Assets Attributable to Common Shareholders:
Beginning of year			131,015,206				123,905,004
End of year		$	143,192,001			$	131,015,206

(a) Effective September 30, 2018, the Fund has adopted disclosure requirements conforming to SEC Rule 6-04.17 of Regulation S-X. See Note 2 for further details.

* For the year ended September 30, 2017, the distributions to Preferred shareholders from net investment income and net realized gain were $30,340 and $26,535, respectively.

** For the year ended September 30, 2017, the distributions to Common shareholders from net investment income and net realized gain were $3,022,372 and $2,643,433, respectively.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

8

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year:

	Year Ended September 30, 2018
	2018				2017				2016				2015				2014
Operating Performance:
Net asset value, beginning of year		$	10.18			$	9.60			$	9.45			$	10.29			$	9.54
Net investment income			0.17				0.18				0.20				0.13				0.14
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) on investments			1.33				0.93				0.76				(0.35	)			0.80
Total from investment operations			1.50				1.11				0.96				(0.22	)			0.94
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders: (a)
Net investment income			(0.05	)			(0.00	)(b)			—				—				—
Net realized gain			(0.07	)			(0.00	)(b)			—				—				—
Total distributions to preferred shareholders			(0.12	)			(0.00	)(b)			—				—				—
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets Attributable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Operations			1.38				1.11				0.96				(0.22	)			0.94
Distributions to Common Shareholders:
Net investment income			(0.19	)			(0.23	)			(0.26	)			(0.25	)			(0.24	)
Net realized gain			(0.29	)			(0.21	)			(0.53	)			(0.43	)			—
Total distributions to common shareholders			(0.48	)			(0.44	)			(0.79	)			(0.68	)			(0.24	)
Fund Share Transactions:
Decrease in net asset value from common shares issued upon reinvestment of distributions			(0.01	)			(0.01	)			(0.04	)			(0.00	)(b)			—
Increase in net asset value from repurchase of common shares (includes transaction costs)			—				0.01				0.02				0.06				0.05
Offering costs for preferred shares charged to paid-in capital			(0.00	)(b)			(0.09	)			—				—				—
Total Fund share transactions			(0.01	)			(0.09	)			(0.02	)			0.06				0.05
Net Asset Value Attributable to Common Shareholders, End of Year		$	11.07			$	10.18			$	9.60			$	9.45			$	10.29
NAV total return†			13.85	%			10.89	%			10.64	%			(0.78	)%			10.92	%
Market value, end of year		$	10.31			$	9.26			$	8.19			$	7.82			$	8.65
Investment total return††			17.08	%			18.89	%			15.98	%			(2.32	)%			13.03	%
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data:
Net assets including liquidation value of preferred shares, end of year (in 000’s)		$	173,192			$	161,015				—				—				—
Net assets attributable to common shares, end of year (in 000’s)		$	143,192			$	131,015			$	123,905			$	120,948			$	135,267
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets attributable to common shares			1.64	%			1.92	%			2.19	%			1.40	%			1.30	%
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets attributable to common shares before reimbursement			1.18	%(c)(d)			1.08	%(c)(d)			1.10	%(c)			1.10	%			1.10	%
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets attributable to common shares net of reimbursement			1.18	%(c)(e)			1.08	%(c)(e)			1.10	%(c)			1.10	%			1.10	%
Portfolio turnover rate			34.6	%			32.0	%			38.0	%			45.0	%			48.0	%

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

9

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Financial Highlights (Continued)

	Year Ended September 30, 2018
	2018				2017				2016		2015		2014
Cumulative Preferred Shares:
5.250% Series A Preferred
Liquidation value, end of year (in 000’s)		$	30,000			$	30,000			—		—		—
Total shares outstanding (in 000’s)			1,200				1,200			—		—		—
Liquidation preference per share		$	25.00			$	25.00			—		—		—
Average market value(f)		$	24.56			$	25.14			—		—		—
Asset coverage per share		$	144.33			$	134.18			—		—		—
Asset Coverage			577	%			537	%		—		—		—

† For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, the return was based on net asset value per share, adjusted for reinvestment of distributions at net asset value on the ex-dividend date. For the fiscal years ended on September 30, 2014 and 2015, returns were based on the market price on the payable date.

†† Based on market value per share, adjusted for reinvestment of distributions at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan.

(a) Calculated based on average common shares outstanding on the record dates throughout the year.

(b) Amount represents less than $0.005 per share.

(c) The Fund received credits from a designated broker who agreed to pay certain Fund operating expenses. For the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, there was no impact on the expense ratios.

(d) Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets including liquidation value of preferred shares before reimbursement for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 would have been 0.96% and 1.07%, respectively.

(e) Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets including liquidation value of preferred shares net of reimbursement for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 would have been 0.96% and 1.07%, respectively.

(f) Based on weekly prices.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

10

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements

1. Organization. Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. currently operates as a diversified closed-end management investment company organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). Investment operations commenced in July 1986.

The Fund’s primary investment objective is to provide income and the potential for capital appreciation, which objectives the Fund considers to be relatively equal over the long term due to the nature of the securities in which it invests. The Fund invests primarily in convertible and equity securities.

2. Significant Accounting Policies. As an investment company, the Fund follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance, which is part of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that may require the use of management estimates and assumptions in the preparation of its financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements. The SEC recently adopted changes to Regulation S-X to simplify the reporting of information by registered investment companies in financial statements. The amendments require presentation of the total, rather than the components, of distributable earnings on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and also require presentation of the total, rather than the components, of distributions to shareholders, except for tax return of capital distributions, if any, on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets. The amendments also removed the requirement for parenthetical disclosure of undistributed net investment income on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets. These Regulation S-X amendments are reflected in the Fund’s financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2018. As a result of adopting these amendments, the distributions to shareholders in the September 30, 2017 Statement of Changes in Net Assets presented herein have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

To improve the effectiveness of fair value disclosure requirements, the Financial Accounting Standards Board recently issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2018-13), which adds, removes, and modifies certain aspects relating to fair value disclosure. ASU 2018-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption of the additions relating to ASU 2018-13 is not required, even if early adoption is elected for the removals under ASU 2018-13. Management has early adopted the removals set forth in ASU 2018-13 in these financial statements and has not early adopted the additions set forth in ASU 2018-13.

Security Valuation. Portfolio securities listed or traded on a nationally recognized securities exchange or traded in the U.S. over-the-counter market for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the last quoted sale price or a market’s official closing price as of the close of business on the day the securities are being valued. If there were no sales that day, the security is valued at the average of the closing bid and asked prices or, if there were no asked prices quoted on that day, then the security is valued at the closing bid price on that day. If no bid or asked prices are quoted on such day, the security is valued at the most recently available price or, if the Board of Trustees (the Board) so determines, by such other method as the Board shall determine in good faith to reflect its fair market value. Portfolio securities traded on more than one national securities exchange or market are valued according to the broadest and most representative market, as determined by Gabelli Funds, LLC (the Adviser).

11

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

Portfolio securities primarily traded on a foreign market are generally valued at the preceding closing values of such securities on the relevant market, but may be fair valued pursuant to procedures established by the Board if market conditions change significantly after the close of the foreign market, but prior to the close of business on the day the securities are being valued. Debt obligations for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the average of the latest bid and asked prices. If there were no asked prices quoted on such day, the security is valued using the closing bid price, unless the Board determines such amount does not reflect the securities’ fair value, in which case these securities will be fair valued as determined by the Board. Certain securities are valued principally using dealer quotations. Futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price of the exchange or board of trade on which the applicable contract is traded. OTC futures and options on futures for which market quotations are readily available will be valued by quotations received from a pricing service or, if no quotations are available from a pricing service, by quotations obtained from one or more dealers in the instrument in question by the Adviser.

Securities and assets for which market quotations are not readily available are fair valued as determined by the Board. Fair valuation methodologies and procedures may include, but are not limited to: analysis and review of available financial and non-financial information about the company; comparisons with the valuation and changes in valuation of similar securities, including a comparison of foreign securities with the equivalent U.S. dollar value American Depositary Receipt securities at the close of the U.S. exchange; and evaluation of any other information that could be indicative of the value of the security.

The inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value of the Fund’s investments are summarized into three levels as described in the hierarchy below:

● Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities;

● Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); and

● Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Board’s determinations as to the fair value of investments).

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input both individually and in the aggregate that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The summary of the Fund’s investments in securities by inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2018 is as follows:

12

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

	Valuation Inputs
	Level 1 Quoted Prices		Level 2 Other Significant Observable Inputs		Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total Market Value at 9/30/18
INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES:
ASSETS (Market Value):
Convertible Corporate Bonds:
Energy and Utilities		—		$    6,305,726		$           0		$    6,305,726
Other Industries (a)		—		93,754,859		—		93,754,859
Total Convertible Corporate Bonds		—		100,060,585		0		100,060,585
Convertible Preferred Stocks:
Business Services		—		—		450,098		450,098
Food and Beverage		—		1,454,668		—		1,454,668
Other Industries (a)		$  2,860,583		—		—		2,860,583
Total Convertible Preferred Stocks		2,860,583		1,454,668		450,098		4,765,349
Mandatory Convertible Securities:
Computer Software and Services		—		1,198,130		—		1,198,130
Energy and Utilities		6,011,571		503,975		—		6,515,546
Financial Services		2,863,421		4,886,500		—		7,749,921
Other Industries (a)		10,114,988		—		—		10,114,988
Total Mandatory Convertible Securities		18,989,980		6,588,605		—		25,578,585
Common Stocks (a)		35,359,983		—		—		35,359,983
Warrants (a)		—		—		0		0
U.S. Government Obligations		—		6,903,439		—		6,903,439
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES		$57,210,546		$115,007,297		$450,098		$172,667,941

(a) Please refer to the Schedule of Investments (SOI) for the industry classifications of these portfolio holdings.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund did not have transfers into or out of Level 3.

The following table reconciles Level 3 investments for the Fund for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value

																			Net change
																			in unrealized
																			appreciation/
																			depreciation
																			during the
																			period on
							Change in												Level 3
	Balance		Accrued		Realized		unrealized						Transfers		Transfers		Balance		investments
Ellsworth Growth and	as of		discounts/		gain/		appreciation/						into		out of		as of		still held at
Income Fund	09/30/17		(premiums)		(loss)		(depreciation)†		Purchases		Sales		Level 3		Level 3		09/30/18		09/30/18†
INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES:
Assets (Market Value):
EQUITY CONTRACTS:
Convertible Corporate Bonds (a)	$	0		—		—		—		—		—		—		—	$	0		—
Convertible Preferred Stocks (a)		450,098		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		450,098		—
Warrants (a)		0		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		0		—
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES	$	450,098		—		—		—		—		—		—		—	$	450,098		—

(a) Please refer to the Schedule of Investments for the industry classifications of these portfolio holdings.

† Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments is included in the related amounts in the Statement of Operations.

13

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

The following tables summarize the valuation techniques used and unobservable inputs utilized to determine the value of certain of the Fund’s Level 3 investments as of September 30, 2018.

Description	Balance at 09/30/18			Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input		Range
INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES:
ASSETS (Market Value):
Convertible Corporate Bonds (a)		$	0	Bankruptcy		Discount Range		0%
Convertible Preferred Stock (a)			450,098	Acquisition price/cash flow analysis		Discount Range		0%
Warrants (a)			0	Bankruptcy		Discount Range		0%
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN LEVEL 3 SECURITIES		$	450,098

(a) Please refer to the Schedule of Investments for the regional classifications of these portfolio holdings.

Unobservable Input	Impact to Value if Input Increases	Impact to Value if Input Decreases
Discount Range	Decrease	Increase

Additional Information to Evaluate Qualitative Information.

General. The Fund uses recognized industry pricing services – approved by the Board and unaffiliated with the Adviser – to value most of its securities, and uses broker quotes provided by market makers of securities not valued by these and other recognized pricing sources. Several different pricing feeds are received to value domestic equity securities, international equity securities, preferred equity securities, and fixed income securities. The data within these feeds are ultimately sourced from major stock exchanges and trading systems where these securities trade. The prices supplied by external sources are checked by obtaining quotations or actual transaction prices from market participants. If a price obtained from the pricing source is deemed unreliable, prices will be sought from another pricing service or from a broker/dealer that trades that security or similar securities.

Fair Valuation. Fair valued securities may be common or preferred equities, warrants, options, rights, or fixed income obligations. Where appropriate, Level 3 securities are those for which market quotations are not available, such as securities not traded for several days, or for which current bids are not available, or which are restricted as to transfer. When fair valuing a security, factors to consider include recent prices of comparable securities that are publicly traded, reliable prices of securities not publicly traded, the use of valuation models, current analyst reports, valuing the income or cash flow of the issuer, or cost if the preceding factors do not apply. A significant change in the unobservable inputs could result in a lower or higher value in Level 3 securities. The circumstances of Level 3 securities are frequently monitored to determine if fair valuation measures continue to apply.

The Adviser reports quarterly to the Board the results of the application of fair valuation policies and procedures. These may include backtesting the prices realized in subsequent trades of these fair valued securities to fair values previously recognized.

Investments in Other Investment Companies. The Fund may invest, from time to time, in shares of other investment companies (or entities that would be considered investment companies but are excluded from the definition pursuant to certain exceptions under the 1940 Act) (the Acquired Funds) in accordance with the 1940 Act and related rules. Shareholders in the Fund would bear the pro rata portion of the periodic expenses of

14

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

the Acquired Funds in addition to the Fund’s expenses. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund’s pro rata portion of the periodic expenses charged by the Acquired Funds was approximately 0.03%.

Foreign Currency Translations. The books and records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign currencies, investments, and other assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of investment securities, income, and expenses are translated at the exchange rate prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. Unrealized gains and losses that result from changes in foreign exchange rates and/or changes in market prices of securities have been included in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments and foreign currency translations. Net realized foreign currency gains and losses resulting from changes in exchange rates include foreign currency gains and losses between trade date and settlement date on investment securities transactions, foreign currency transactions, and the difference between the amounts of interest and dividends recorded on the books of the Fund and the amounts actually received. The portion of foreign currency gains and losses related to fluctuation in exchange rates between the initial purchase trade date and subsequent sale trade date is included in realized gain/(loss) on investments.

Foreign Securities. The Fund may directly purchase securities of foreign issuers. Investing in securities of foreign issuers involves special risks not typically associated with investing in securities of U.S. issuers. The risks include possible revaluation of currencies, the inability to repatriate funds, less complete financial information about companies, and possible future adverse political and economic developments. Moreover, securities of many foreign issuers and their markets may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. issuers.

Foreign Taxes. The Fund may be subject to foreign taxes on income, gains on investments, or currency repatriation, a portion of which may be recoverable. The Fund will accrue such taxes and recoveries as applicable, based upon its current interpretation of tax rules and regulations that exist in the markets in which it invests.

Restricted Securities. The Fund may invest up to 15% of its net assets in securities for which the markets are restricted. Restricted securities include securities whose disposition is subject to substantial legal or contractual restrictions. The sale of restricted securities often requires more time and results in higher brokerage charges or dealer discounts and other selling expenses than the sale of securities eligible for trading on national securities exchanges or in the over-the-counter markets. Restricted securities may sell at a price lower than similar securities that are not subject to restrictions on resale. Securities freely saleable among qualified institutional investors under special rules adopted by the SEC may be treated as liquid if they satisfy liquidity standards established by the Board. The continued liquidity of such securities is not as well assured as that of publicly traded securities, and accordingly the Board will monitor their liquidity. For the restricted securities as of September 30, 2018, please refer to the Schedule of Investments.

Securities Transactions and Investment Income. Securities transactions are accounted for on the trade date with realized gain/(loss) on investments determined by using the identified cost method. Interest income (including amortization of premium and accretion of discount) is recorded on an accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized using the effective yield to maturity method. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except for certain dividends from foreign securities that are recorded as soon after the ex-dividend date as the Fund becomes aware of such dividends. For certain securities known as “contingent payment debt instruments,” Federal tax regulations require the Fund to record non-cash, “contingent” interest income in addition to interest income actually received.

15

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

Custodian Fee Credits. When cash balances are maintained in the custody account, the Fund receives credits which are used to offset custodian fees. The gross expenses paid under the custody arrangement are included in custodian fees in the Statement of Operations with the corresponding expense offset, if any, shown as “Custodian fee credits.”

Distributions to Shareholders. Distributions to common shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The characterization of distributions to shareholders is based on income and capital gains as determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from income and capital gains as determined under GAAP. These differences are primarily due to differing treatments of income and gains on various investment securities and foreign currency transactions held by the Fund, timing differences, and differing characterizations of distributions made by the Fund. Distributions from net investment income for federal income tax purposes include net realized gains on foreign currency transactions. These book/tax differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent, adjustments are made to the appropriate capital accounts in the period when the differences arise. Permanent differences were primarily due to redesignation of dividends paid and reclassification of convertible bond premiums at disposition. These reclassifications have no impact on the NAV of the Fund. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, reclassifications were made to decrease paid-in capital by $1,432,294 with an offsetting adjustment to total distributable earnings.

Under the Fund’s current common share distribution policy, the Fund declares and pays quarterly distributions from net investment income, capital gains, and paid-in capital. The actual source of the distribution is determined after the end of the year. Pursuant to this policy, distributions during the year may be made in excess of required distributions. To the extent such distributions are made from current earnings and profits, they are considered ordinary income or long term capital gains. The Fund’s current distribution policy may restrict the Fund’s ability to pass through to shareholders all of its net realized long term capital gains as a Capital Gain Dividend and may cause such gains to be treated as ordinary income, subject to the maximum federal income tax rate. Distributions sourced from paid-in capital should not be considered as dividend yield or the total return from an investment in the Fund. The Board will continue to monitor the Fund’s distribution level, taking into consideration the Fund’s NAV and the financial market environment. The Fund’s distribution policy is subject to modification by the Board at any time.

Distributions to shareholders of the Fund’s 5.250% Series A Cumulative Preferred Shares (Series A Preferred) are recorded on a daily basis and are determined as described in Note 5.

The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:

	Year Ended				Year Ended
	September 30, 2018				September 30, 2017
	Common		Preferred		Common		Preferred
Distributions paid from:
Ordinary income (inclusive of short term capital gains)	$	3,537,738	$	898,478	$	3,044,635	$	30,563
Net long term capital gains		2,663,788		676,522		2,621,170		26,312
Total distributions paid	$	6,201,526	$	1,575,000	$	5,665,805	$	56,875

Provision for Income Taxes. The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). It is the policy of the Fund to comply with the requirements of the Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute

16

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

substantially all of its net investment company taxable income and net capital gains. Therefore, no provision for federal income taxes is required.

As of September 30, 2018, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Net unrealized appreciation on investments and foreign currency translations	$	30,496,177
Undistributed long term capital gains		2,144,941
Current year dividends payable		(21,875	)
Total	$	32,619,243

At September 30, 2018, the temporary differences between book basis and tax basis net unrealized appreciation on investments were primarily due to amortization of bond premium and investments in partnerships.

The following summarizes the tax cost of investments and the related net unrealized appreciation at September 30, 2018:

		Gross	Gross	Net
		Unrealized	Unrealized	Unrealized
	Cost	Appreciation	Depreciation	Appreciation
Investments	$142,171,764	$32,906,779	$(2,410,602)	$30,496,177

The Fund is required to evaluate tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Income tax and related interest and penalties would be recognized by the Fund as tax expense in the Statement of Operations if the tax positions were deemed not to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund did not incur any income tax, interest, or penalties. As of September 30, 2018, the Adviser has reviewed all open tax years and concluded that there was no impact to the Fund’s net assets or results of operations. The Fund’s federal and state tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain open, subject to examination. On an ongoing basis, the Adviser will monitor the Fund’s tax positions to determine if adjustments to this conclusion are necessary.

3. Agreements and Other Transactions. The Fund has entered into an investment advisory agreement (the Advisory Agreement) with the Adviser which provides that the Fund will pay the Adviser a fee, computed daily and paid monthly, equal on an annual basis to 0.80% of the first $100,000,000 of the Fund’s average weekly net assets including the liquidation value of preferred stock and 0.55% of the Fund’s average weekly net assets including the liquidation value of preferred stock in excess of $100,000,000. In accordance with the Advisory Agreement, the Adviser provides a continuous investment program for the Fund’s portfolio and oversees the administration of all aspects of the Fund’s business and affairs.

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund paid $391 in brokerage commissions on security trades to G.research, LLC, Inc., an affiliate of the Adviser.

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund received credits from a designated broker who agreed to pay certain Fund operating expenses. The amount of such expenses paid through this directed brokerage arrangement during this period was $708.

Through October 31, 2017, the Adviser waived fees or reimbursed expenses of the Fund to the extent the total expenses of the Fund (excluding brokers costs, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses, expenses

17

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

chargeable to capital, and extraordinary expenses) exceed 1.10% of the weekly average net assets of the Fund. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the Adviser neither waived fees nor reimbursed expenses to the Fund.

The cost of calculating the Fund’s NAV per share is a Fund expense pursuant to the Advisory Agreement between the Fund and the Adviser. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund accrued $45,000 in connection with the cost of computing the Fund’s NAV.

The Fund pays each Trustee who is not considered an affiliated person an annual retainer of $8,500 plus $1,000 for each Board meeting attended. Each Trustee is reimbursed by the Fund for any out of pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings. All Board committee members receive $500 per meeting attended. The Lead Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $1,000 and the Audit and Nominating Committee Chairman each receives an annual fee of $2,000. A Trustee may receive a single meeting fee, allocated among the participating funds, for participation in certain meetings held on behalf of multiple funds. Trustees who are directors or employees of the Adviser or an affiliated company receive no compensation or expense reimbursement from the Fund.

4. Portfolio Securities. Purchases and sales of securities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, other than short term securities and U.S. Government obligations, aggregated $61,620,981 and $55,736,014, respectively.

5. Capital. The Fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares of beneficial interest (par value $0.01). The Board has authorized the repurchase of its common shares in the open market when the shares are trading at a discount of 10.0% or more (or such other percentage as the Board may determine from time to time) from the NAV of the shares. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, the Fund repurchased and retired 121,457 shares in the open market at an investment of $1,005,727 and an average discount of approximately 13.95% from its NAV. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund did not repurchase any shares.

Transactions in common shares of beneficial interest for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	Year Ended					Year Ended
	September 30, 2018					September 30, 2017
	Shares		Amount			Shares			Amount
Net increase in net assets from common shares issued upon reinvestment of distributions		65,634		$	604,486		80,356			$	646,865
Net decrease from repurchase of common shares.		—			—		(121,457	)			(1,005,727	)
Net increase/(decrease) from transactions in Fund shares		65,634		$	604,486		(41,101	)		$	(358,862	)

The Fund has an effective shelf registration authorizing the offering of an additional $100 million of common or preferred shares. As of September 30, 2018, after considering the Series A Preferred offering, the Fund has approximately $70 million available for issuance under the current shelf registration

On September 18, 2017, the Fund issued 1,200,000 shares of Series A Preferred, receiving $28,855,381, after the deduction of offering expenses of $199,619 and underwriting fees of $945,000. The liquidation value of the Series A Preferred is $25 per share. The Series A Preferred has an annual dividend rate of 5.250%. The

18

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

Series A Preferred is noncallable before September 18, 2022. At September 30, 2018, 1,200,000 shares of Series A Preferred were outstanding and accrued dividends amounted to $21,875. The Board has authorized the repurchase of the Series A Preferred in the open market at prices less than the $25 liquidation value per share.

The Fund’s Declaration of Trust, as amended, authorizes the issuance of an unlimited number of Series A Preferred, par value $0.01. The Series A Preferred are senior to the common shares and result in the financial leveraging of the common shares. Such leveraging tends to magnify both the risks and opportunities to common shareholders. Dividends on the Series A Preferred are cumulative. The Fund is required by the 1940 Act and by the Statement of Preferences to meet certain asset coverage tests with respect to the Series A Preferred. If the Fund fails to meet these requirements and does not correct such failure, the Fund may be required to redeem, in part or in full, the Series A Preferred at the redemption price of $25 per share plus an amount equal to the accumulated and unpaid dividends whether or not declared on such shares in order to meet these requirements. Additionally, failure to meet the foregoing asset coverage requirements could restrict the Fund’s ability to pay dividends to common shareholders and could lead to sales of portfolio securities at inopportune times. The income received on the Fund’s assets may vary in a manner unrelated to the fixed rate, which could have either a beneficial or detrimental impact on net investment income and gains available to common shareholders.

The holders of Series A Preferred generally are entitled to one vote per share held on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Fund and will vote together with holders of common shares as a single class. The holders of Series A Preferred voting together as a single class also have the right currently to elect two Trustees and under certain circumstances are entitled to elect a majority of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of all outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred, voting as a single class, will be required to approve any plan of reorganization adversely affecting the Series A Preferred, and the approval of two-thirds of each class, voting separately, of the Fund’s outstanding voting stock must approve the conversion of the Fund from a closed-end to an open-end investment company. The approval of a majority (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the outstanding Series A Preferred and of the Fund’s outstanding voting securities are required to approve certain other actions, including changes in the Fund’s investment objectives or fundamental investment policies.

6. Convertible Securities Concentration. It is the Fund’s policy to invest at least 65% of its assets in convertible securities. Although convertible securities derive part of their value from that of the securities into which they are convertible, they are not considered derivative financial instruments. However, the Fund’s mandatory convertible securities include features which render them more sensitive to price changes of their underlying securities. Thus they expose the Fund to greater downside risk than traditional convertible securities, but generally less than that of the underlying common stock.

7. Indemnifications. The Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts. Management has reviewed the Fund’s existing contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

19

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

8. Subsequent Events. Management has evaluated the impact on the Fund of all subsequent events occurring through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

20

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Trustees of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. and Shareholders of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (the “Fund”) as of September 30, 2018, the related statement of operations, statement of changes in net assets attributable to common shareholders, and the financial highlights for the year then ended, including the related notes, (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of September 30, 2018, the results of its operations, of changes in its net assets attributable to common shareholders, and its financial highlights for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended September 30, 2017 and the financial highlights for each of the periods ended on or prior to September 30, 2017 (not presented herein, other than the statement of changes in net assets attributable to common shareholders and the financial highlights) were audited by other auditors whose report dated November 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial highlights.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2018 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York

November 27, 2018

We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex since 1986.

21

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Additional Fund Information (Unaudited)

The business and affairs of the Fund are managed under the direction of the Fund’s Board of Trustees. Information pertaining to the Trustees and officers of the Fund is set forth below. The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge, upon request, by calling 800-GABELLI (800-422-3554) or by writing to Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. at One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580-1422.

Name, Position(s) Address1 and Age	Term of Office and Length of Time Served2	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee3	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years	Other Directorships Held by Trustee4
INTERESTED TRUSTEES5:
Mario J. Gabelli, CFA Trustee and Chairman Age: 76	Since 2015***	33	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer– Value Portfolios of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Chief Investment Officer– Value Portfolios of Gabelli Funds, LLC and GAMCO Asset Management Inc.; Director/ Trustee or Chief Investment Officer of other registered investment companies within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex; Chief Executive Officer of GGCP, Inc.; Executive Chairman of Associated Capital Group, Inc.	Director of Morgan Group Holdings, Inc. (holding company); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LICT Corp. (multimedia and communication services company); Director of CIBL, Inc. (broadcasting and wireless communications); Director of ICTC Group Inc. (communications)
James A. Dinsmore, CFA Trustee and President Age: 35	Since 2015*	1	President of the Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.; Portfolio Manager for Gabelli Funds, LLC; Executive Vice President of the Bancroft Fund Ltd. (2013-2015); Executive Vice President of the Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (January 2013-February 2014)	—
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES6:
Kinchen C. Bizzell Trustee Age: 64	Since 2008**	2	Private Investor; Managing Director of CAVU Securities (securities broker-dealer) (2013- 2016); Investor Relations Managing Director (1998-2003) and Senior Counselor (2004- 2013) at Burson-Marsteller (global public relations and communications)	—
Elizabeth C. Bogan Trustee Age: 74	Since 1986*	4	Senior Lecturer in Economics at Princeton University	—
James P. Conn Trustee Age: 80	Since 2015**	26	Former Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. (1992-1998)	—
Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr.7: Trustee Age: 79	Since 2015**	14	Co-Chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of the American Gaming Association (1995-2013); Former Chairman of the Republican National Committee (1983- 1989)	Director of First Republic Bank (banking); Director of Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (casino entertainment company)

22

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Additional Fund Information (Continued) (Unaudited)

Name, Position(s) Address1 and Age	Term of Office and Length of Time Served2	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee3	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years	Other Directorships Held by Trustee4
Daniel D. Harding Trustee Age: 66	Since 2007***	3	Managing General Partner of the Global Equity Income Fund (private investment fund); Director of TRC (private asset management); General Partner of Latitude Capital Partners, LLC (private investment); Director of Legg Mason Investment Counsel, LLC and Chair of Investment Committee (2010-2012)	—
Michael J. Melarkey Trustee Age: 68	Since 2015**	25	Of Counsel in the law firm of McDonald Carano Wilson LLP; Partner in the law firm of Avansino, Melarkey, Knobel, Mulligan & McKenzie (1980-2015)	Director of Southwest Gas Corporation (natural gas utility)
Kuni Nakamura7: Trustee Age: 50	Since 2015***	36	President of Advanced Polymer, Inc. (chemical manufacturing company); President of KEN Enterprises, Inc. (real estate)	—
Nicolas W. Platt Trustee Age: 65	Since 1997***	2	Private Investor; Member of NYSE MKT LLC Committee on Securities; Township Committee Member, Harding, New Jersey; former Mayor of Township of Harding, New Jersey (2013- 2016); Managing Director of FTI Consulting Inc. (international consulting company) (March 2009-May 2011)	—
Anthonie C. van Ekris8 Trustee Age: 84	Since 2015*	21	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BALMAC International, Inc. (global import/ export company)	—

Name, Position(s) Address1 and Age	Term of Office and Length of Time Served9	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
OFFICERS:
John C. Ball Treasurer Age: 42	Since 2017	Treasurer of registered investment companies within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex since 2017; Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of AMG Funds, 2014-2017; Vice President of State Street Corporation, 2007-2014
Agnes Mullady Vice President Age: 60	Since 2015	Officer of registered investment companies within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex since 2006; President and Chief Operating Officer of the Fund Division of Gabelli Funds, LLC since 2015; Chief Executive Officer of G.distributors, LLC since 2010; Senior Vice President of GAMCO Investors, Inc. since 2009; Vice President of Gabelli Funds, LLC since 2007; Executive Vice President of Associated Capital Group, Inc. since 2016
Andrea R. Mango Secretary and Vice President Age: 46	Since 2015	Vice President of GAMCO Investors, Inc. since 2016; Counsel of Gabelli Funds, LLC since 2013; Secretary of registered investment companies within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex since 2013; Vice President of closed-end funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex since 2014; Corporate Vice President within the Corporate Compliance Department of New York Life Insurance Company, 2011-2013
Richard J. Walz Chief Compliance Officer Age: 59	Since 2015	Chief Compliance Officer of registered investment companies within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex since 2013; Chief Compliance Officer of AEGON USA Investment Management, 2011-2013
Laurissa M. Martire Vice President and Ombudsman Age: 42	Since 2015	Vice President and/or Ombudsman of closed-end funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex; Vice President (since 2016) and Assistant Vice President (2003-2016) of GAMCO Investors, Inc.

23

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Additional Fund Information (Continued) (Unaudited)

Name, Position(s) Address1 and Age	Term of Office and Length of Time Served9	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
Bethany A. Uhlein Vice President and Ombudsman Age: 28	Since 2017	Vice President and/or Ombudsman of closed-end funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex since 2017; Assistant Vice President (since 2015) and Associate (2013 - 2015) for GAMCO Asset Management Inc.; Operations Associate for GAMCO Investors, Inc. (2012 – 2013)

1 Address: One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580-1422, unless otherwise noted.

2 The Fund’s Board of Trustees is divided into three classes, each class having a term of three years. Each year the term of office of one class expires and the successor or successors elected to such class serve for a three year term. The three year term for each class expires as follows:

* — Term expires at the Fund’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

** — Term expires at the Fund’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

*** — Term expires at the Fund’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Each officer will hold office for an indefinite term until the date he or she resigns or retires or until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

3 The “Fund Complex” or the “Gabelli/GAMCO Fund Complex” includes all the U.S. registered investment companies that are considered part of the same fund complex as the Fund because they have common or affiliated investment advisers.

4 This column includes only directorships of companies required to report to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, i.e., public companies, or other investment companies registered under the 1940 Act.

5 “Interested person” of the Fund, as defined in the 1940 Act. Messrs. Gabelli and Dinsmore are each considered to be an “interested person” of the Fund because of their affiliation with the Fund’s Adviser.

6 Trustees who are not considered to be “interested persons” of the Fund as defined in the 1940 Act are considered to be “Independent” Trustees.

7 This Trustee is elected soley by and represents the shareholders of the preferred shares issued by this Fund.

8 Mr. Fahrenkopf’s daughter, Lesle. F. Foley, serves as a director of other funds in the Fund Complex. Mr. van Ekris is an independent director of Gabelli International Ltd., Gabelli Fund LDC, Gama Capital Opportunities Master Ltd., and GAMCO International SICAV, and Mr. Nakamura is a director of Gabelli Merger Plus+ Trust Plc, all of which may be deemed to be controlled by Mario J. Gabelli and/or affiliates and, in that event, would be deemed to be under common control with the Fund’s Adviser.

9 Includes time served in prior officer positions with the Fund. Each officer will hold office for an indefinite term until the date he or she resigns and retires or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies.

Shareholder Meeting – May 14, 2018 – Final Results (Unaudited)

The Fund’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 14, 2018, in Greenwich, Connecticut. At that meeting, common and preferred shareholders, voting together as a single class, elected Mario J. Gabelli, Daniel D. Harding, and Nicolas W. Platt as Trustees of the Fund. A total of 8,972,362 votes, 11,893,644 votes, and 11,894,487 votes were cast in favor of these Trustees, and a total of 3,953,244 votes, 1,031,963 votes, and 1,031,119 votes were withheld for these Trustees, respectively.

In addition, preferred shareholders, voting as a separate class, elected Kuni Nakamura as a Trustee of the Fund. A total of 915,317 votes were cast in favor of this Trustee and a total of 83,987 votes were withheld for this Trustee.

James A. Dinsmore, Kinchen C. Bizzell, Elizabeth C. Bogan, James P. Conn, Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr., and Michael J. Melarkey continue to serve in their capacities as Trustees of the Fund.

We thank you for your participation and appreciate your continued support.

24

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Board Consideration and Re-Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (Unaudited)

At its meeting on August 22, 2018, the Board of Trustees (Board) of the Fund approved the continuation of the investment advisory agreement with the Adviser for the Fund on the basis of the recommendation by the trustees who are not interested persons of the Fund (the Independent Board Members). The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Independent Board Members as well as their conclusions relative to such factors.

The Independent Board Members also noted that they were impressed with the overall quality of the materials relating to the Board’s consideration of the Advisory Agreement.

Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services.

The Independent Board Members considered information regarding the portfolio managers, the depth of the analyst pool available to the Adviser and the portfolio managers, the scope of administrative, shareholder and other services supervised or provided by the Adviser and the absence of significant service problems reported to the Board. The Independent Board Members noted the experience, length of service, and reputation of the portfolio managers as well as the Independent Board Members’ satisfaction with the performance of the portfolio managers since the Adviser assumed control of the Fund in 2015.

Investment Performance.

The Independent Board Members reviewed the performance of the Fund for the one, three, and five year periods (as of June 30, 2018) against a peer group of 14 convertible funds prepared by the Adviser (the Adviser Peer Group) and against a larger peer group of 29 closed-end funds constituting the Fund’s Lipper category (Closed-End Core, Convertible, and Value Equity Funds) (the Lipper Peer Group). The Independent Board Members noted that the Fund’s performance was in the second quartile for the one year, three year, and five year periods for the Adviser Peer Group, and in the second quartile for the one year period, third quartile for the three year period, and second quartile for the five year period for the Lipper Peer Group.

Profitability.

The Independent Board Members reviewed summary data regarding the profitability of the Fund to the Adviser both with an administrative overhead charge and without such a charge and noted the Adviser’s estimated pre-tax operating margin attributable to the Fund in both scenarios.

Economies of Scale.

The Independent Board Members discussed the major elements of the Adviser’s cost structure and the relationship of those elements to potential economies of scale.

Sharing of Economies of Scale.

The Independent Board Members noted that the Fund’s advisory fee contained a reduction for assets in excess of $100 million, which would indicate a sharing even if economies of scale were not experienced at such a low asset level.

Service and Cost Comparisons.

The Independent Board Members compared the expense ratios of the investment management fee, other expenses, and total expenses of the Fund with similar expense ratios of the Adviser Peer Group and the Lipper Peer

25

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

Board Consideration and Re-Approval of Investment Advisory Contract (Unaudited) (Continued)

Group. The Independent Board Members noted that the Adviser’s management fee includes substantially all administrative services for the Fund as well as investment advisory services. The Independent Board Members noted that within the Adviser Peer Group, the Fund’s investment management fee was slightly above the Adviser Peer Group average, but that its total expense ratio was slightly below the Adviser Peer Group average. It was noted that within the peer group, none of the other funds employ leverage. The Independent Board Members further noted that both the Fund’s investment management fee and total expense ratio were below the Lipper Peer Group average. The Independent Board Members also noted that the management fee structure was different from that in effect for most of the Gabelli funds, in that it contains a reduction for assets in excess of $100 million and is lower than the management fees in effect for most other Gabelli funds due to the retention of the Fund’s historical fee structure when the Adviser assumed the management of the Fund in 2015.

Conclusions.

The Independent Board Members concluded that the Fund enjoyed highly experienced portfolio management services and good ancillary services, and that the Fund’s performance record has been acceptable since the Adviser assumed control of the Fund in 2015. The Independent Board Members concluded that the profitability to the Adviser of managing the Fund was reasonable and that economies of scale were not a significant factor in their thinking at this point. The Independent Board Members did not view the potential profitability of ancillary services as material to their decision. On the basis of the foregoing and without assigning particular weight to any single conclusion, the Independent Board Members determined to recommend continuation of the Advisory Agreement to the full Board.

Based on a consideration of all these factors in their totality, the Board Members, including all of the Independent Board Members, determined that the Fund’s advisory fee was fair and reasonable with respect to the quality of services provided and in light of the other factors described above that the Board deemed relevant. Accordingly, the Board Members determined to approve the continuation of the Fund’s Advisory Agreement. The Board Members based their decision on evaluations of all these factors as a whole and did not consider any one factor as all important or controlling.

26

ELLSWORTH GROWTH AND INCOME FUND LTD.

INCOME TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)

September 30, 2018

Cash Dividends and Distributions

					Total Amount		Ordinary		Long Term		Dividend
	Payable		Record		Paid		Investment		Capital		Reinvestment
	Date		Date		Per Share (a)		Income (a)		Gains (a)		Price
Common Stock
		12/15/17		11/14/17		$0.12002		$0.06722		$0.05280		$9.21000
		02/21/18		02/13/18		0.12002		0.06722		0.05280		9.13080
		05/23/18		05/16/18		0.12003		0.06723		0.05280		9.42240
		08/24/18		08/17/18		0.12003		0.06723		0.05280		10.03400
						$0.48010		$0.26890		$0.21120

Corporate Dividends Received Deduction, Qualified Dividend Income, and U.S. Government Securities Income

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund paid to common shareholders, ordinary income distributions (inclusive of short term capital gains) totaling $0.26890 per share, and long term capital gains totaling $3,340,310, or the maximum allowable. The distribution of long term capital gains has been designated as a capital gain dividend by the Fund’s Board of Trustees. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, 38.97% of the ordinary income distribution qualifies for the dividends received deduction available to corporations. The Fund designates 41.01% of the ordinary income distribution as qualified dividend income pursuant to the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. The Fund designates 56.01% of the ordinary income distribution as qualified interest income and short term distributions totaling $1,276,738 was qualified short term capital gain pursuant to the Tax Relief, Unemployment Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010.

Historical Distribution Summary

			Short Term		Long Term
	Investment		Capital		Capital		Total
	Income (b)		Gains (b)		Gains		Distributions (a)
Common Shares
2018		$0.19370		$0.07520		$0.21120		$0.48010
2017		0.22827		0.00173		0.21000		0.44000
2016		0.25610		0.00870		0.53220		0.79690

(a) Total amounts may differ due to rounding.

(b) Taxable as ordinary income for Federal tax purposes.

All designations are based on financial information available as of the date of this annual report and, accordingly, are subject to change. For each item, it is the intention of the Fund to designate the maximum amount permitted under the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder.

27

AUTOMATIC DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT

AND VOLUNTARY CASH PURCHASE PLANS

Enrollment in the Plan

It is the policy of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. to automatically reinvest dividends payable to common shareholders. As a “registered” shareholder you automatically become a participant in the Fund’s Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan authorizes the Fund to credit common shares to participants upon an income dividend or a capital gains distribution regardless of whether the shares are trading at a discount or a premium to net asset value. All distributions to shareholders whose shares are registered in their own names will be automatically reinvested pursuant to the Plan in additional shares of the Fund. Plan participants may send their share certificates to American Stock Transfer (“AST”) to be held in their dividend reinvestment account. Registered shareholders wishing to receive their distributions in cash must submit this request in writing to:

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

c/o American Stock Transfer

6201 15th Avenue

Brooklyn, NY 11219

Shareholders requesting this cash election must include the shareholder’s name and address as they appear on the share certificate. Shareholders with additional questions regarding the Plan or requesting a copy of the terms of the Plan, may contact AST at (888) 422-3262.

If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, or nominee, you should contact such institution. If such institution is not participating in the Plan, your account will be credited with a cash dividend. In order to participate in the Plan through such institution, it may be necessary for you to have your shares taken out of “street name” and re-registered in your own name. Once registered in your own name your distributions will be automatically reinvested. Certain brokers participate in the Plan. Shareholders holding shares in “street name” at participating institutions will have dividends automatically reinvested. Shareholders wishing a cash dividend at such institution must contact their broker to make this change.

The number of common shares distributed to participants in the Plan in lieu of cash dividends is determined in the following manner. Under the Plan, whenever the market price of the Fund’s common shares is equal to or exceeds net asset value at the time shares are valued for purposes of determining the number of shares equivalent to the cash dividends or capital gains distribution, participants are issued common shares valued at the greater of (i) the net asset value as most recently determined or (ii) 95% of the then current market price of the Fund’s common shares. The valuation date is the dividend or distribution payment date or, if that date is not a NYSE Amex trading day, the next trading day. If the net asset value of the common shares at the time of valuation exceeds the market price of the common shares, participants will receive common shares from the Fund valued at market price. If the Fund should declare a dividend or capital gains distribution payable only in cash, AST will buy common shares in the open market, or on the NYSE Amex, or elsewhere, for the participants’ accounts, except that AST will endeavor to terminate purchases in the open market and cause the Fund to issue shares at net asset value if, following the commencement of such purchases, the market value of the common shares exceeds the then current net asset value.

The automatic reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions will not relieve participants of any income tax which may be payable on such distributions. A participant in the Plan will be treated for federal income tax purposes as having received, on a dividend payment date, a dividend or distribution in an amount equal to the cash the participant could have received instead of shares.

Voluntary Cash Purchase Plan

The Voluntary Cash Purchase Plan is yet another vehicle for our shareholders to increase their investment in the Fund. In order to participate in the Voluntary Cash Purchase Plan, shareholders must have their shares registered in their own name.

Participants in the Voluntary Cash Purchase Plan have the option of making additional cash payments to AST for investments in the Fund’s common shares at the then current market price. Shareholders may send an amount from $100 to $10,000. AST will use these funds to purchase shares in the open market on or about the 15th of each month. AST will charge each shareholder who participates $1.25 and a pro rata share of the brokerage commissions. Brokerage charges for such purchases are expected to be less than the usual brokerage charge for such transactions. It is suggested that any voluntary cash payments be sent to American Stock Transfer, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11219 such that AST receives such payments approximately 10 days before the investment date. Funds not received at least five days before the investment date shall be held for investment until the next purchase date. A payment may be withdrawn without charge if notice is received by AST at least 48 hours before such payment is to be invested.

Shareholders wishing to liquidate shares held at AST must do so in writing or by telephone. Please submit your request to the above mentioned address or telephone number. Include in your request your name, address, and account number. Brokerage charges are expected to be less than the usual brokerage charge for such transactions.

For more information regarding the Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Voluntary Cash Purchase Plan, brochures are available by calling (914) 921-5070 or by writing directly to the Fund.

The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan as applied to any voluntary cash payments made and any dividend or distribution paid subsequent to written notice of the change sent to the members of the Plan at least 90 days before the record date for such dividend or distribution. The Plan also may be amended or terminated by AST on at least 90 days written notice to participants in the Plan.

28

ELLSWORTH GROWTH AND INCOME FUND LTD.

AND YOUR PERSONAL PRIVACY

Who are we?

The Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (the “Fund”) is a closed-end management investment company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940. We are managed by Gabelli Funds, LLC, which is affiliated with GAMCO Investors, Inc. GAMCO Investors, Inc. is a publicly held company that has subsidiaries that provide investment advisory services for a variety of clients.

What kind of non-public information do we collect about you if you become a Fund shareholder?

When you purchase shares of the Fund on the New York Stock Exchange, you have the option of registering directly with our transfer agent in order, for example, to participate in our dividend reinvestment plan.

● Information you give us on your application form. This could include your name, address, telephone number, social security number, bank account number, and other information.

● Information about your transactions with us. This would include information about the shares that you buy or sell; it may also include information about whether you sell or exercise rights that we have issued from time to time. If we hire someone else to provide services — like a transfer agent — we will also have information about the transactions that you conduct through them.

What information do we disclose and to whom do we disclose it?

We do not disclose any non-public personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone other than our affiliates, our service providers who need to know such information, and as otherwise permitted by law. If you want to find out what the law permits, you can read the privacy rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. They are in volume 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 248. The Commission often posts information about its regulations on its website, www.sec.gov.

What do we do to protect your personal information?

We restrict access to non-public personal information about you to the people who need to know that information in order to provide services to you or the Fund and to ensure that we are complying with the laws governing the securities business. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to keep your personal information confidential.

This page was intentionally left blank.

Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.

One Corporate Center

Rye, NY 10580-1422

(Y)our Portfolio Management Team Biographies

Thomas H. Dinsmore, CFA, joined Gabelli Funds, LLC in 2015. He currently serves as a portfolio manager of Gabelli Funds, LLC and manages several funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Funds Complex. Previously Mr. Dinsmore was Chairman and CEO of Dinsmore Capital Management; CEO and Portfolio Manager of Bancroft Fund Ltd; and CEO, Portfolio Manager, and co-founder of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. He received a BS in Economics from the Wharton School of Business and an MA degree in Economics from Fairleigh Dickinson University.

Jane D. O’Keeffe joined Gabelli Funds, LLC in 2015. She currently serves as a portfolio manager of Gabelli Funds, LLC and manages several funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Funds Complex. Previously Ms. O’Keeffe was President and Director of Dinsmore Capital Management where she was also a Portfolio Manager of Bancroft Fund Ltd. and Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. Prior to joining Dinsmore Capital Management, Ms. O’Keeffe held positions of increasing responsibilities at IDS Progressive Fund, Soros Fund Management Company, Simms Capital Management, and Fiduciary Trust International. She earned a BA from the University of New Hampshire and attended the Lubin Graduate School of Business at Pace University.

James A. Dinsmore, CFA, joined Gabelli Funds, LLC in 2015. He currently serves as a portfolio manager of Gabelli Funds, LLC and manages several funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Funds Complex. Mr. Dinsmore received a BA in Economics from Cornell University and an MBA degree from Rutgers University.

We have separated the portfolio managers’ commentary from the financial statements and investment portfolio due to corporate governance regulations stipulated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We have done this to ensure that the content of the portfolio managers’ commentary is unrestricted. Both the commentary and the financial statements, including the portfolio of investments, will be available on our website at www.gabelli.com.

The Net Asset Value per share appears in the Publicly Traded Funds column, under the heading “Specialized Equity Funds,” in Monday’s The Wall Street Journal. It is also listed in Barron’s Mutual Funds/Closed End Funds section under the heading “Convertible Securities Funds.”

The Net Asset Value per share may be obtained each day by calling (914) 921-5070 or visiting www.gabelli.com.

The NASDAQ symbol for the Net Asset Value is “XECFX.”

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, that the Fund may from time to time purchase its common shares in the open market when the Fund’s shares are trading at a discount of 10.0% or more from the net asset value of the shares. The Fund may also from time to time purchase its preferred shares in the open market when the preferred shares are trading at a discount to the liquidation value.

ELLSWORTH GROWTH AND INCOME FUND LTD.

One Corporate Center

Rye, NY 10580-1422

t 800-GABELLI (800-422-3554)

f 914-921-5118

e info@gabelli.com

GABELLI.COM

TRUSTEES   Mario J. Gabelli, CFA Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, GAMCO Investors, Inc. Executive Chairman, Associated Capital Group Inc.   Kinchen C. Bizzell Managing Director, CAVU Securities   Elizabeth C. Bogan Senior Lecturer, Economics Princeton University   James P. Conn Former Managing Director & Chief Investment Officer, Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd.   James A. Dinsmore, CFA Portfolio Manager, Gabelli Funds, LLC   Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr. Former President & Chief Executive Officer, American Gaming Association   Daniel D. Harding Managing General Director, Global Equity Income Fund   Michael J. Melarkey Of Counsel, McDonald Carano Wilson LLP   Kuni Nakamura President, Advanced Polymer, Inc. Nicolas W. Platt Former Managing Director, FTI Consulting Inc.   Anthonie C. van Ekris Chairman, BALMAC International Inc.   OFFICERS   James A. Dinsmore, CFA President   John C. Ball Treasurer   Agnes Mullady Vice President   Andrea R. Mango Secretary & Vice President   Richard J. Walz Chief Compliance Officer   Laurissa M. Martire Vice President & Ombudsman   Bethany A. Uhlein Vice President & Ombudsman   INVESTMENT ADVISER   Gabelli Funds, LLC   CUSTODIAN   State Street Bank and Trust Company   COUNSEL   Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP   TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR   American Stock Transfer and Trust Company

ECF Q3/2018

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

(a) The registrant, as of the end of the period covered by this report, has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party.

(c) There have been no amendments, during the period covered by this report, to a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, and that relates to any element of the code of ethics description.

(d) The registrant has not granted any waivers, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (b) of this item’s instructions.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

As of the end of the period covered by the report, the registrant’s Board of Directors has determined that Daniel D. Harding is qualified to serve as an audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee and that he is “independent,” as defined by Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

(a) The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years are $0 for 2017 and $26,000 for 2018.

Audit-Related Fees

(b) The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item are $0 for 2017 and $0 for 2018.

Tax Fees

(c) The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning are $0 for 2017 and $3,700 for 2018. This relates to preparation and review of the registrant’s tax returns.

All Other Fees

(d) The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item are $0 for 2017 and $0 for 2018.

(e)(1) Disclose the audit committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Audit Committee (“Committee”) of the registrant is responsible for pre-approving (i) all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the registrant and (ii) all permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Adviser, Gabelli Funds, LLC, and any affiliate of Gabelli Funds, LLC (“Gabelli”) that provides services to the registrant (a “Covered Services Provider”) if the independent registered public accounting firm’s engagement related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant. The Committee may delegate its responsibility to pre-approve any such audit and permissible non-audit services to the Chairperson of the Committee, and the Chairperson must report to the Committee, at its next regularly scheduled meeting after the Chairperson’s pre-approval of such services, his or her decision(s). The Committee may also establish detailed pre-approval policies and procedures for pre-approval of such services in accordance with applicable laws, including the delegation of some or all of the Committee’s pre-approval responsibilities to the other persons (other than Gabelli or the registrant’s officers). Pre-approval by the Committee of any permissible non-audit services is not required so long as: (i) the permissible non-audit services were not recognized by the registrant at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (ii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved by the Committee or Chairperson prior to the completion of the audit.

(e)(2) The percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X are as follows:

(b) N/A

(c) 0%

(d) N/A

(f) The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was less than fifty percent.

(g) The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrant’s accountant for services rendered to the registrant, and rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant was $0 for 2017 and $3,700 for 2018.

(h) The registrant’s audit committee of the board of directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

The registrant has a separately designated audit committee consisting of the following members: Kinchen C. Bizzell, Elizabeth C. Bogan, Daniel D. Harding, and Kuni Nakamura.

Item 6. Investments.

(a) Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this form.

(b) Not applicable.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

The Proxy Voting Policies are attached herewith.

POLICY REGARDING VOTING OF PROXIES ON BEHALF OF CLIENTS

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of this policy and its related procedures regarding voting proxies for securities held in Client accounts and for which an Adviser has been delegated proxy voting authority (“Client Proxies”) is to establish guidelines regarding Client Proxies that are reasonably designed to conform with the requirements of applicable law (this “Policy”).

General Policy

Rule 206(4)-6 of the Advisers Act requires a registered investment adviser that exercises proxy voting authority over client securities to: (i) adopt and implement written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that the investment adviser votes proxies related to client securities in the best interest of its Clients; (ii) ensure that the written policies and procedures address material conflicts that may arise between the interests of the investment adviser and those of its Clients; (iii) describe its proxy voting procedures to Clients, and provide copies of such procedures upon request by such Clients; and (iv) disclose to Clients how they may obtain information from the Adviser about how the Adviser voted with respect to their Securities. Each Adviser is committed to implementing policies and procedures that conform with the requirements of the Advisers Act. To that end, it has implemented this Policy to facilitate the Adviser’s compliance with Rule 206(4)-6 and to ensure that proxies related to Client Securities are voted (or not voted) in a manner consistent with the best interest of its Clients.

The Voting of Proxies on Behalf of Clients

These following procedures will be used by each of the Advisers to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio Securities held by their Clients, including the procedures that the Advisers use when a vote presents a conflict between the interests of the investors in a Private Fund Client, RIC or Managed Account Client, on the one hand, and those of the Adviser; the principal underwriter; or any affiliated person of such Client, the Advisers, or the principal underwriter. These procedures will not apply where the Advisers do not have voting discretion or where the Advisers have agreed with a Client to vote the Client’s proxies in accordance with specific guidelines or procedures supplied by the Client (to the extent permitted by ERISA)¹.

Proxy Voting Committee

The Advisers’ Proxy Voting Committee (the “Proxy Committee”) was originally formed in April 1989 for the purpose of formulating guidelines and reviewing proxy statements within the parameters of the Proxy Voting Guidelines, which are appended as EXHIBIT A to this Policy. The Proxy Committee includes representatives from Research, Administration, Legal, and the Advisers. Additional or

¹ With respect to any Private Fund Client or RIC Client, such deviation from these guidelines will be disclosed in the offering materials for such Client.

Revised: November 14, 2018

replacement members of the Proxy Committee will be nominated by the Chairman and voted upon by the entire Proxy Committee.

Meetings are held on an as needed basis to form views on the manner in which the Advisers should vote proxies on behalf of their Clients.

In general, the Director of Proxy Voting Services, using the Proxy Voting Guidelines, recommendations of Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), Glass Lewis & Co., LLC (“Glass Lewis”), other third-party services and the analysts of G.research, will determine how to vote on each issue. For non-controversial matters, the Director of Proxy Voting Services may vote the proxy if the vote is: (1) consistent with the recommendations of the issuer’s Board of Directors and not contrary to the Proxy Voting Guidelines; (2) consistent with the recommendations of the issuer’s Board of Directors and is a non-controversial issue not covered by the Proxy Voting Guidelines; or (3) the vote is contrary to the recommendations of the Board of Directors but is consistent with the Proxy Voting Guidelines. In those instances, the Director of Proxy Voting Services or the Chairman of the Proxy Committee may sign and date the proxy statement indicating how each issue will be voted.

All matters identified by the Chairman of the Proxy Committee, the Director of Proxy Voting Services or the General Counsel as controversial, taking into account the recommendations of ISS, Glass Lewis, other third party services and the analysts of G.research, will be presented to the Proxy Voting Committee. If the Chairman of the Proxy Committee, the Director of Proxy Voting Services or the General Counsel has identified the matter as one that (1) is controversial; (2) would benefit from deliberation by the Proxy Committee; or (3) may give rise to a conflict of interest between the Advisers and investors in the Clients or the Clients, the Chairman of the Proxy Committee will initially determine what vote to recommend that the relevant Adviser should cast and that determination will go before the Proxy Committee for review.

Conflicts of Interest

The Advisers have implemented this Policy in order to prevent conflicts of interest from influencing their proxy voting decisions. By following the Proxy Voting Guidelines, as well as the recommendations of ISS, Glass Lewis, other third-party services and the analysts of G.research, the Advisers seek to avoid, wherever possible, the influence of potential conflicts of interest. Nevertheless, circumstances may arise in which one or more of the Advisers are faced with a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest in connection with a proxy vote. In general, a conflict of interest may arise when an Adviser knowingly does business with an issuer, and may appear to have a material conflict between its own interests and the interests of the investors in a Client regarding how the proxy is to be voted. A conflict also may exist when an Adviser has actual knowledge of a material business arrangement between an issuer and an affiliate of the Adviser.

In practical terms, a conflict of interest may arise, for example, when a proxy is voted for a company that is a Client of one of the Adviser. A conflict also may arise when a Client of one of the Advisers has made a shareholder proposal in a proxy to be voted upon by one or more of the Advisers. The Director of Proxy Voting Services, together with the General Counsel, will scrutinize all proxies for these or other situations that may give rise to a conflict of interest with respect to the voting of proxies.

Revised: November 14, 2018

Operation of the Proxy Committee

For matters submitted to the Proxy Committee, each member of the Proxy Committee will receive, prior to the meeting, a copy of the proxy statement, any relevant third party research, a summary of any views provided by the portfolio manager of the applicable Client and any recommendations by G.research analysts. The portfolio manager, any member of Senior Management or the G.research analysts may be invited to present their viewpoints to the Proxy Committee. If the Director of Proxy Voting Services or the General Counsel believes that the matter before the Proxy Committee is one with respect to which a conflict of interest may exist between the Advisers and their Clients’ or investors, the General Counsel may provide an opinion to the Proxy Committee concerning the conflict. If the matter is one in which the interests of the Clients or investors, on the one hand, or the applicable Adviser, on the other, may diverge, The General Counsel may so advise and the Proxy Committee may make different recommendations as to different Clients. For any matters where the recommendation may trigger appraisal rights, The General Counsel may provide an opinion concerning the likely risks and merits of such an appraisal action.

Each matter submitted to the Proxy Committee will be determined by the vote of a majority of the members present at the meeting. Should the vote concerning one or more recommendations be tied in a vote of the Proxy Committee, the Chairman of the Proxy Committee will cast the deciding vote. The Proxy Committee will notify the proxy department of its decisions and the proxies will be voted accordingly.

Although the Proxy Voting Guidelines express the normal preferences for the voting of any interests not covered by a contrary investment guideline provided by the Client, the Proxy Committee is not bound by the preferences set forth in the Proxy Voting Guidelines and will review each matter on its own merits. The Advisers subscribe to ISS and Glass Lewis, which supplies current information on companies, matters being voted on, regulations, trends in proxy voting and information on corporate governance issues.

If the vote cast either by the analyst or as a result of the deliberations of the Proxy Committee runs contrary to the recommendation of the Board of Directors of the issuer, the matter may be referred to the General Counsel to determine whether an amendment to the most recently filed Schedule 13D is appropriate.

Social Issues and Other Client Guidelines

If a Client has provided and the Advisers have accepted special instructions relating to the voting of proxies, they should be noted in the Client’s account file and forwarded to the Proxy Voting Department. This is the responsibility of the investment professional or sales assistant for the Client. In accordance with Department of Labor guidelines, each Adviser shall vote on behalf of ERISA accounts in the best interest of the plan participants with regard to social issues that carry an economic impact. Where an account is not governed by ERISA, the Advisers will vote shares held on behalf of the Client in a manner consistent with any individual investment/voting guidelines provided by the Client. Otherwise the Advisers may abstain with respect to those shares.

Revised: November 14, 2018

Specific to the Gabelli ESG Fund, the Proxy Voting Committee will rely on the advice of the portfolio managers of the Gabelli ESG Fund to provide voting recommendations on the securities held in the portfolio.

Client Retention of Voting Rights

If a Client chooses to retain the right to vote proxies or if there is any change in voting authority, the following should be notified by the investment professional or sales assistant for the Client.

- Operations

- Proxy Department

- Investment professional assigned to the account

- Chief Compliance Officer

In the event that the Board of Directors (or a Committee thereof) of one or more of the Clients managed by one of the Advisers has retained direct voting control over any security, the Proxy Voting Department will provide each Board Member (or Committee member) of the Client with a copy of the proxy statement together with any other relevant information including recommendations of ISS or other third-party services.

Proxies of Certain Non-U.S. Issuers

Proxy voting in certain countries requires “share-blocking.” Shareholders wishing to vote their proxies must deposit their shares shortly before the date of the meeting with a designated depository. During the period in which the shares are held with a depository, shares that will be voted at the meeting cannot be sold until the meeting has taken place and the shares are returned to the Clients’ custodian. Absent a compelling reason to the contrary, the Advisers believe that the benefit to the Client of exercising the vote is outweighed by the cost of voting and therefore, the Advisers will not typically vote the securities of non-U.S. issuers that require share-blocking.

In addition, voting proxies of issuers in non-US markets may also give rise to a number of administrative issues to prevent the Advisers from voting such proxies. For example, the Advisers may receive the notices for shareholder meetings without adequate time to consider the proposals in the proxy or after the cut-off date for voting. In these cases, the Advisers will look to Glass Lewis or other third party service for recommendations on how to vote. Other markets require the Advisers to provide local agents with power of attorney prior to implementing their respective voting instructions on the proxy. Although it is the Advisers’ policies to vote the proxies for its clients for which they have proxy voting authority, in the case of issuers in non-US markets, we vote client proxies on a best efforts basis.

Voting Records and Client Disclosure

The Proxy Voting Department will retain a record of matters voted upon by the Advisers for their Clients. The Advisers will supply information on how they voted a Client’s proxy upon request from the Client or an investor in a Client.

Revised: November 14, 2018

Registered Investment Companies and Form N-PX

The complete voting records for each RIC that is managed by an Adviser will be filed on Form N-PX for the twelve months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. A description of the RIC proxy voting policies, procedures, and how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by (i) calling 800-GABELLI (800-422-3554); (ii) writing to Gabelli Funds, LLC at One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580-1422; or (iii) visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Form ADV Disclosure

Each Adviser to a RIC or Private Fund Client will disclose in Part 2A of its Form ADV that such Clients may contact the Chief Compliance Officer during regular business hours, via email or telephone, to obtain information on how each Adviser voted such Client’s proxies for the past 5 years. The summary of this Policy included in each Adviser’s Part 2A of its Form ADV will be updated whenever this Policy is revised. Clients may also receive a copy of this Policy upon their request.

Note that updating the Form ADV with a change to this Policy outside of the annual update is voluntary. However, each Adviser will need to communicate to the Client any changes to this Policy affecting its fiduciary duty.

The Advisers’ proxy voting records will be retained in accordance with the Policy Regarding Recordkeeping.

Voting Procedures

1.  Custodian banks, outside brokerage firms and clearing firms are responsible for forwarding proxies directly to the Advisers.

Proxies are received in one of two forms:

*          Shareholder Vote Instruction Forms (“VIFs”) - Issued by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”). Broadridge is an outside service contracted by the various institutions to issue proxy materials.

* Proxy cards which may be voted directly.

2.   Upon receipt of the proxy, the number of shares each form represents is logged into the proxy system, electronically or manually, according to security.

3.    Upon receipt of instructions from the proxy committee, the votes are cast and recorded for each account.

Records have been maintained on the ProxyEdge system.

ProxyEdge records include:

Revised: November 14, 2018

Security Name and CUSIP Number

Date and Type of Meeting (Annual, Special, Contest)

Client Name

Adviser or Fund Account Number

Directors’ Recommendation

How the Adviser voted for the client on item

4. VIFs are kept alphabetically by security. Records for the current proxy season are located in the Proxy Voting Department office. In preparation for the upcoming season, files are transferred to an offsite storage facility during January/February.

5. If a proxy card or VIF is received too late to be voted in the conventional matter, every attempt is made to vote including:

● When a solicitor has been retained, the solicitor is called. At the solicitor’s direction, the proxy is faxed or sent electronically.

● In some circumstances VIFs can be faxed or sent electronically to Broadridge up until the time of the meeting.

6. In the case of a proxy contest, records are maintained for each opposing entity.

7. Voting in Person

a) At times it may be necessary to vote the shares in person. In this case, a “legal proxy” is obtained in the following manner:

* Banks and brokerage firms using the services at Broadridge:

Broadridge is notified that we wish to vote in person. Broadridge issues individual legal proxies and sends them back via email or overnight (or the Adviser can pay messenger charges). A lead-time of at least two weeks prior to the meeting is needed to do this. Alternatively, the procedures detailed below for banks not using Broadridge may be implemented.

Revised: November 14, 2018

* Banks and brokerage firms issuing proxies directly:

The bank is called and/or faxed and a legal proxy is requested.

All legal proxies should appoint:

“Representative of [Adviser name] with full power of substitution.”

b) The legal proxies are given to the person attending the meeting along with the limited power of attorney.

Revised: November 14, 2018

EXHIBIT A

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

General Policy Statement

It is the policy of the Advisers to vote in the best economic interests of our Clients. As we state in our Magna Carta of Shareholders Rights, established in May 1988, we are neither for nor against management. We are for shareholders.

At our first Proxy Committee meeting in 1989, it was decided that each proxy statement should be evaluated on its own merits within the framework first established by our Magna Carta of Shareholders Rights. The attached guidelines serve to enhance that broad framework.

We do not consider any issue routine. We take into consideration all of our research on the company, its directors, and their short and long-term goals for the company. In cases where issues that we generally do not approve of are combined with other issues, the negative aspects of the issues will be factored into the evaluation of the overall proposals but will not necessitate a vote in opposition to the overall proposals.

Board of Directors

We do not consider the election of the Board of Directors a routine issue. Each slate of directors is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Factors taken into consideration include:

* Historical responsiveness to shareholders

This may include such areas as:

-Paying greenmail

-Failure to adopt shareholder resolutions receiving a majority of votes

* Qualifications

* Nominating committee in place

* Number of outside directors on the board

* Attendance at meetings

* Overall performance

Revised: November 14, 2018

Selection of Auditors

In general, we support the Board of Directors’ recommendation for auditors.

Blank Check Preferred Stock

We oppose the issuance of blank check preferred stock.

Blank check preferred stock allows the company to issue stock and establish dividends, voting rights, etc. without further shareholder approval.

Classified Board

A classified board is one where the directors are divided into classes with overlapping terms. A different class is elected at each annual meeting.

While a classified board promotes continuity of directors facilitating long range planning, we feel directors should be accountable to shareholders on an annual basis. We will look at this proposal on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the board’s historical responsiveness to the rights of shareholders.

Where a classified board is in place we will generally not support attempts to change to an annually elected board.

When an annually elected board is in place, we generally will not support attempts to classify the board.

Increase Authorized Common Stock

The request to increase the amount of outstanding shares is considered on a case-by-case basis.

Factors taken into consideration include:

* Future use of additional shares

-Stock split

-Stock option or other executive compensation plan

-Finance growth of company/strengthen balance sheet

-Aid in restructuring

-Improve credit rating

-Implement a poison pill or other takeover defense

* Amount of stock currently authorized but not yet issued or reserved for stock option plans

* Amount of additional stock to be authorized and its dilutive effect

Revised: November 14, 2018

We will support this proposal if a detailed and verifiable plan for the use of the additional shares is contained in the proxy statement.

Confidential Ballot

We support the idea that a shareholder’s identity and vote should be treated with confidentiality. However, we look at this issue on a case-by-case basis. In order to promote confidentiality in the voting process, we endorse the use of independent Inspectors of Election.

Cumulative Voting

In general, we support cumulative voting.

Cumulative voting is a process by which a shareholder may multiply the number of directors being elected by the number of shares held on the record date and cast the total number for one candidate or allocate the voting among two or more candidates.

Where cumulative voting is in place, we will vote against any proposal to rescind this shareholder right.

Cumulative voting may result in a minority block of stock gaining representation on the board. When a proposal is made to institute cumulative voting, the proposal will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. While we feel that each board member should represent all shareholders, cumulative voting provides minority shareholders an opportunity to have their views represented.

Director Liability and Indemnification

We support efforts to attract the best possible directors by limiting the liability and increasing the indemnification of directors, except in the case of insider dealing.

Equal Access to the Proxy

The SEC’s rules provide for shareholder resolutions. However, the resolutions are limited in scope and there is a 500 word limit on proponents’ written arguments. Management has no such limitations. While we support equal access to the proxy, we would look at such variables as length of time required to respond, percentage of ownership, etc.

Fair Price Provisions

Charter provisions requiring a bidder to pay all shareholders a fair price are intended to prevent two-tier tender offers that may be abusive. Typically, these provisions do not apply to board-approved transactions.

We support fair price provisions because we feel all shareholders should be entitled to receive the same benefits.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Revised: November 14, 2018

Golden Parachutes

Golden parachutes are severance payments to top executives who are terminated or demoted after a takeover.

We support any proposal that would assure management of its own welfare so that they may continue to make decisions in the best interest of the company and shareholders even if the decision results in them losing their job. We do not, however, support excessive golden parachutes. Therefore, each proposal will be decided on a case-by- case basis.

Anti-Greenmail Proposals

We do not support greenmail. An offer extended to one shareholder should be extended to all shareholders equally across the board. Limit Shareholders’ Rights to Call Special Meetings

We support the right of shareholders to call a special meeting.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Consideration of Nonfinancial Effects of a Merger

This proposal releases the directors from only looking at the financial effects of a merger and allows them the opportunity to consider the merger’s effects on employees, the community, and consumers. As a fiduciary, we are obligated to vote in the best economic interests of our Clients. In general, this proposal does not allow us to do that. Therefore, we generally cannot support this proposal.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Mergers, Buyouts, Spin-Offs, Restructurings

Each of the above is considered on a case-by-case basis. According to the Department of Labor, we are not required to vote for a proposal simply because the offering price is at a premium to the current market price for ERISA Clients. We must take into consideration the long term interests of the shareholders.

Military Issues

Shareholder proposals regarding military production must be evaluated on a purely economic set of criteria for our ERISA Clients. As such, decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis.

In voting on this proposal for our non-ERISA clients, we will vote according to the Client’s direction when applicable. Where no direction has been given, we will vote in the best economic interests of our Clients. It is not our duty to impose our social judgment on others.

Revised: November 14, 2018

Northern Ireland

Shareholder proposals requesting the signing of the MacBride principles for the purpose of countering the discrimination of Catholics in hiring practices must be evaluated on a purely economic set of criteria for our ERISA Clients. As such, decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis.

In voting on this proposal for our non-ERISA Clients, we will vote according to Client direction when applicable. Where no direction has been given, we will vote in the best economic interests of our clients. It is not our duty to impose our social judgment on others.

Opt Out of State Anti-Takeover Law

This shareholder proposal requests that a company opt out of the coverage of the state’s takeover statutes. Example: Delaware law requires that a buyer must acquire at least 85% of the company’s stock before the buyer can exercise control, unless the board approves.

We consider this on a case-by-case basis. Our decision will be based on the following:

* State of Incorporation

* Management history of responsiveness to shareholders

* Other mitigating factors

Poison Pills

In general, we do not endorse poison pills.

In certain cases where management has a history of being responsive to the needs of shareholders and the stock is very liquid, we will reconsider this position.

Reincorporation

Generally, we support reincorporation for well-defined business reasons. We oppose reincorporation if proposed solely for the purpose of reincorporating in a state with more stringent anti-takeover statutes that may negatively impact the value of the stock.

Stock Incentive Plans

Director and Employee Stock incentive plans are an excellent way to attract, hold and motivate directors and employees. However, each incentive plan must be evaluated on its own merits, taking into consideration the following:

* Dilution of voting power or earnings per share by more than 10%.

* Kind of stock to be awarded, to whom, when and how much.

* Method of payment.

* Amount of stock already authorized but not yet issued under existing stock plans.

Revised: November 14, 2018

* The successful steps taken by management to maximize shareholder value.

Supermajority Vote Requirements

Supermajority voting requirements in a company’s charter or bylaws require a level of voting approval in excess of a simple majority of the outstanding shares. In general, we oppose supermajority-voting requirements. Supermajority requirements often exceed the average level of shareholder participation. We support proposals’ approval by a simple majority of the shares voting.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Limit Shareholders Right to Act by Written Consent

Written consent allows shareholders to initiate and carry on a shareholder action without having to wait until the next annual meeting or to call a special meeting. It permits action to be taken by the written consent of the same percentage of the shares that would be required to effect proposed action at a shareholder meeting.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

“Say-on-Pay” / “Say-When-on-Pay” / “Say-on-Golden-Parachutes”

Required under the Dodd-Frank Act; these proposals are non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation. We will generally vote with the Board of Directors’ recommendation(s) on advisory votes on executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”), advisory votes on the frequency of voting on executive compensation (“Say-When-on-Pay”) and advisory votes relating to extraordinary transaction executive compensation (“Say-on-Golden-Parachutes”). In those instances when we believe that it is in our clients’ best interest, we may abstain or vote against executive compensation and/or the frequency of votes on executive compensation and/or extraordinary transaction executive compensation advisory votes.

Proxy Access

Proxy access is a tool used to attempt to promote board accountability by requiring that a company’s proxy materials contain not only the names of management nominees, but also any candidates nominated by long-term shareholders holding at least a certain stake in the company. We will review proposals regarding proxy access on a case-by-case basis taking into account the provisions of the proposal, the company’s current governance structure, the successful steps taken by management to maximize shareholder value, as well as other applicable factors.

Revised: November 14, 2018

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Portfolio Managers

Ms. Jane O’Keeffe, Mr. Thomas Dinsmore, and Mr. James Dinsmore serve as Portfolio Managers of the Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund.

Portfolio Management

Jane O’Keeffe joined Gabelli Funds, LLC in 2015. Ms. O’Keeffe currently serves as a portfolio manager of the Fund and several funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Funds complex. From 1996 to 2015, Ms. O’Keeffe was President and Director of Dinsmore Capital. She has a B.A. from the University of New Hampshire and attended the Lubin Graduate School of Business at Pace University.

Thomas Dinsmore, CFA, joined Gabelli Funds, LLC in 2015. Mr. T. Dinsmore currently serves as a portfolio manager of the Fund and several funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Funds complex. Mr. T. Dinsmore was Chairman and CEO of Dinsmore Capital from 1996 to 2015. He has a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School of Business, and an M.A. in Economics from Fairleigh Dickinson University.

James Dinsmore, CFA, joined Gabelli Funds, LLC in 2015. Mr. J. Dinsmore currently serves as a portfolio manager of the Fund and several funds within the Gabelli/GAMCO Funds complex. Mr. J. Dinsmore received a BA in Economics from Cornell University and an MBA from Rutgers University.

Ellsworth Growth & Income Fund (As of September 30, 2018)

Name of Portfolio Manager or Team Member	Type of Accounts	Total No. of Accounts Managed	Total     Assets	No. of Accounts where Advisory Fee   is Based on Performance	Total Assets in Accounts where Advisory Fee   is Based on Performance
1.   Jane D. O’Keeffe	Registered Investment Companies:	3	$300.6     million	1	$105.3 million
	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles:	0	$0	0	$0
	Other Accounts:	6	$6.0     million	0	$0
2.   Thomas H. Dinsmore	Registered Investment Companies:	3	$300.6     million	1	$105.3 million
	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles:	0	$0	0	$0
	Other Accounts:	5	$2.0     million	0	$0

3.   James A. Dinsmore	Registered Investment Companies:	3	$300.6     million	1	$105.3             million
	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles:	0	$0	0	$0
	Other Accounts:	4	$0.7     million	0	$0

Potential Conflicts of Interests

As reflected above, the Portfolio Managers manage accounts in addition to the Fund. Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a Portfolio Manager also has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to one or more other accounts. These potential conflicts include:

Allocation of Limited Time and Attention. As indicated above, the Portfolio Managers manage multiple accounts. As a result, they will not be able to devote all of their time to the management of the Fund. The Portfolio Managers, therefore, may not be able to formulate as complete a strategy or identify equally attractive investment opportunities for each of those accounts as might be the case if he/she were to devote all of their attention to the management of only the Fund.

Allocation of Limited Investment Opportunities. As indicated above, the Portfolio Managers manage managed accounts with investment strategies and/or policies that are similar to the Fund. In these cases, if the Portfolio Manager identifies an investment opportunity that may be suitable for multiple accounts, a fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity because the opportunity may be allocated among all or many of these accounts or other accounts managed primarily by other Portfolio Managers of the Investment Adviser, and their affiliates. In addition, in the event a Portfolio Manager determines to purchase a security for more than one account in an aggregate amount that may influence the market price of the security, accounts that purchased or sold the security first may receive a more favorable price than accounts that made subsequent transactions.

Pursuit of Differing Strategies. At times, the Portfolio Managers may determine that an investment opportunity may be appropriate for only some of the accounts for which he/she exercises investment responsibility, or may decide that certain of the funds or accounts should take differing positions with respect to a particular security. In these cases, the Portfolio Manager may execute differing or opposite transactions for one or more accounts which may affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the detriment of one or more other accounts.

Variation in Compensation. A conflict of interest may arise where the financial or other benefits available to the Portfolio Manager differs among the accounts that he/she manages. If the structure of the Investment Adviser’s management fee or the Portfolio Manager’s compensation differs among accounts (such as where certain accounts pay higher management fees or performance based management fees), the Portfolio Manager may be motivated to favor certain accounts over others. The Portfolio Manager also may be motivated to favor accounts in which they have an investment interest, or in which the Investment Adviser, or their affiliates have investment interests. Similarly, the desire to maintain assets under management or to

enhance a Portfolio Manager’s performance record or to derive other rewards, financial or otherwise, could influence the Portfolio Manager in affording preferential treatment to those accounts that could most significantly benefit the Portfolio Manager. For example, as reflected above, if the Portfolio Manager manages accounts which have performance fee arrangements, certain portions of their compensation will depend on the achievement of performance milestones on those accounts. The Portfolio Manager could be incented to afford preferential treatment to those accounts and thereby be subject to a potential conflict of interest. The Investment Adviser, and the Funds have adopted compliance policies and procedures that are designed to address the various conflicts of interest that may arise for the Investment Adviser and their staff members. However, there is no guarantee that such policies and procedures will be able to detect and prevent every situation in which an actual or potential conflict may arise.

Compensation Structure for the Portfolio Managers The compensation for the Portfolio Managers for the Fund is structured to enable the Investment Adviser to attract and retain highly qualified professionals in a competitive environment. The Portfolio Managers receive a compensation package that includes a minimum draw or base salary and incentive based variable compensation based on a percentage of net revenue received by the Investment Adviser for managing the Fund to the extent that the amount exceeds a minimum level of compensation. Net revenues are determined by deducting from gross investment management fees certain of the firm’s expenses (other than the Portfolio Managers’ compensation) allocable to the Fund (the incentive based variable compensation for managing other accounts is also based on a percentage of net revenues to the investment adviser for managing the account). These methods of compensation are based on the premise that superior long term performance in managing a portfolio should be rewarded with higher compensation as a result of growth of assets through appreciation and net investment activity. The level of incentive based variable compensation is based on an evaluation by the Investment Adviser’s parent, GBL, of quantitative and qualitative performance evaluation criteria.

Ownership of Shares in the Fund

Jane O’Keeffe, Thomas Dinsmore, and James Dinsmore] each own $100,001 - $500,000, $500,001 - $1,000,000, and $10,001 - $50,000, respectively, of shares in the Fund as of September 30, 2018.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

REGISTRANT PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period	(a) Total Number of   Shares (or Units)   Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid   per Share (or Unit)	(c) Total Number of   Shares (or Units)   Purchased as Part of   Publicly Announced   Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or   Approximate Dollar Value) of   Shares (or  Units) that May   Yet Be Purchased Under the   Plans or Programs
Month #1 04/01/18 through 04/30/18	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – 12,934,886 Preferred Series A – 1,200,000

Month #2 05/01/18 through 05/31/18	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – 12,934,886 Preferred Series A – 1,200,000
Month #3 06/01/18 through 06/30/18	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – 12,934,886 Preferred Series A – 1,200,000
Month #4 07/01/18 through 07/31/18	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – 12,934,886     Preferred Series A – 1,200,000
Month 08/01/18 through 08/31/18	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – 12,934,886 Preferred Series A – 1,200,000
Month -09/01/18 through -09/30/18	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – 12,934,886 Preferred Series A – 1,200,000
Total	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	Common – N/A Preferred Series A – N/A	N/A

Footnote columns (c) and (d) of the table, by disclosing the following information in the aggregate for all plans or programs publicly announced:

a. The date each plan or program was announced – The notice of the potential repurchase of common and preferred shares occurs quarterly in the Fund’s quarterly report in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

b. The dollar amount (or share or unit amount) approved – Any or all common shares outstanding may be repurchased when the Fund’s common shares are trading at a discount of 10% or more from the net asset value of the shares.

Any or all preferred shares outstanding may be repurchased when the Fund’s preferred shares are trading at a discount to the liquidation value of $25.00.

c. The expiration date (if any) of each plan or program – The Fund’s repurchase plans are ongoing.

d. Each plan or program that has expired during the period covered by the table – The Fund’s repurchase plans are ongoing.

e. Each plan or program the registrant has determined to terminate prior to expiration, or under which the registrant does not intend to make further purchases. – The Fund’s repurchase plans are ongoing.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board of Directors, where those changes were implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.407) (as required by Item 22(b)(15) of Schedule 14A (17 CFR 240.14a-101)), or this Item.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d))) that occurred during the registrant’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 13. Exhibits.

(a)(1) Code of ethics, or any amendment thereto, that is the subject of disclosure required by Item 2 is attached hereto.

(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto.

(a)(3) Not applicable.

(a)(4) Change in the registrant’s independent public accountant.

Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On December 29, 2017, Tait, Weller & Baker LLP (“Tait”) resigned, at the request of the Fund, as the independent registered public accounting firm to the Fund. The Audit Committee of the Fund’s Board of Trustees participated in, and approved, the decision to change the independent registered public accounting firm. Tait’s reports on the Fund’s financial statements for the fiscal periods ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. During the Fund’s fiscal periods ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 and the subsequent interim period through December 29, 2017, (i) there were no disagreements with Tait on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Tait, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their reports on the Fund’s financial statements for such periods, and (ii) there were no “reportable events” of the kind described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Audit Committee of the Fund’s Board of Trustees approved the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018. The selection of PwC does not reflect any disagreements with or dissatisfaction by the Fund or the Board of Trustees with the performance of the Fund’s prior independent registered public accounting firm, Tait. During the Fund’s fiscal periods ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 and the subsequent interim period through December 29, 2017, neither the Fund, nor anyone on its behalf, consulted with PwC on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Fund’s financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of said Item 304).

(b) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant)    Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.                                                                     

By (Signature and Title)*  /s/ James A. Dinsmore                                                                               

                                                 James A. Dinsmore, Principal Executive Officer

Date    11/27/2018                                                                                                                                  

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By (Signature and Title)*  /s/ James A. Dinsmore                                                                               

                                                 James A. Dinsmore, Principal Executive Officer

Date    11/27/2018                                                                                                                                  

By (Signature and Title)*  /s/ John C. Ball                                                                                           

                                                 John C. Ball, Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date    11/27/2018                                                                                                                                  

^* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.

EX-99.CODE ETH

EX-99.CODE ETH

Joint Code of Ethics for Chief Executive

and Senior Financial Officers of the Gabelli/GAMCO/TETON Funds

Each affiliated registered investment company (each a “Company”) is committed to conducting business in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and the highest standards of business ethics, and to full and accurate disclosure -- financial and otherwise -- in compliance with applicable law. This Code of Ethics, applicable to each Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (or persons performing similar functions) (together, “Senior Officers”), sets forth policies to guide you in the performance of your duties.

As a Senior Officer, you must comply with applicable law. You also have a responsibility to conduct yourself in an honest and ethical manner. You have leadership responsibilities that include creating a culture of high ethical standards and a commitment to compliance, maintaining a work environment that encourages the internal reporting of compliance concerns and promptly addressing compliance concerns.

This Code of Ethics recognizes that the Senior Officers are subject to certain conflicts of interest inherent in the operation of investment companies, because the Senior Officers currently or may in the future serve as Senior Officers of each of the Companies, as officers or employees of the investment advisor to the Companies or service providers thereof (the “Advisor”) and/or affiliates of the Advisor (the “Advisory Group”) and as officers or trustees/directors of other registered investment companies and unregistered investment funds advised by the Advisory Group. This Code of Ethics also recognizes that certain laws and regulations applicable to, and certain policies and procedures adopted by, the Companies or the Advisory Group govern your conduct in connection with many of the conflict of interest situations that arise in connection with the operations of the Companies, including:

● the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the rules and regulation promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “1940 Act”);

● the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Advisers Act”);

● the Code of Ethics adopted by each Company pursuant to Rule 17j-1(c) under the 1940 Act (collectively, the “Trust’s 1940 Act Code of Ethics”);

● one or more codes of ethics adopted by the Advisory Group that have been reviewed and approved by those trustees/directors (the “Directors”) of each Company that are not “interested persons” of such Company (the “Independent Directors”) within the meaning of the 1940 Act (the

Revised: July 30, 2014

1

“Advisory Group’s 1940 Act Code of Ethics” and, together with such Company’s 1940 Act Code of Ethics, the “1940 Act Codes of Ethics”);

● the policies and procedures adopted by each Company to address conflict of interest situations, such as procedures under Rule 10f-3, Rule 17a-7 and Rule 17e-1 under the 1940 Act (collectively, the “Conflict Policies”); and

● the Advisory Group’s policies and procedures to address, among other things, conflict of interest situations and related matters (collectively, the “Advisory Policies”).

The provisions of the 1940 Act, the Advisers Act, the 1940 Act Codes of Ethics, the Conflict Policies and the Advisory Policies are referred to herein collectively as the “Additional Conflict Rules”.

This Code of Ethics is different from, and is intended to supplement, the Additional Conflict Rules. Accordingly, a violation of the Additional Conflict Rules by a Senior Officer is hereby deemed not to be a violation of this Code of Ethics, unless and until the Directors shall determine that any such violation of the Additional Conflict Rules is also a violation of this Code of Ethics.

Senior Officers Should Act Honestly and Candidly

Each Senior Officer has a responsibility to each Company to act with integrity. Integrity requires, among other things, being honest and candid. Deceit and subordination of principle are inconsistent with integrity.

Each Senior Officer must:

● act with integrity, including being honest and candid while still maintaining the confidentiality of information where required by law or the Additional Conflict Rules;

● comply with the laws, rules and regulations that govern the conduct of each Company’s operations and report any suspected violations thereof in accordance with the section below entitled “Compliance With Code Of Ethics”; and

● adhere to a high standard of business ethics.

Conflicts Of Interest

A conflict of interest for the purpose of this Code of Ethics occurs when your private interests interfere in any way, or even appear to interfere, with the interests of a Company.

Revised: July 30, 2014

2

Senior Officers are expected to use objective and unbiased standards when making decisions that affect each Company, keeping in mind that Senior Officers are subject to certain inherent conflicts of interest because Senior Officers of a Company also are or may be officers of other Companies and/or the Advisory Group (as a result of which it is incumbent upon you to be familiar with and to seek to comply with the Additional Conflict Rules).

You are required to conduct the business of each Company in an honest and ethical manner, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and business relationships. When making any investment, accepting any position or benefits, participating in any transaction or business arrangement or otherwise acting in a manner that creates or appears to create a conflict of interest with respect to each Company where you are receiving a personal benefit, you should act in accordance with the letter and spirit of this Code of Ethics.

If you are in doubt as to the application or interpretation of this Code of Ethics to you as a Senior Officer of a Company, you should make full disclosure of all relevant facts and circumstances to the Chief Compliance Officer of the Advisory Group (the “CCO”) and obtain the approval of the CCO prior to taking action.

Some conflict of interest situations that should always be approved by the CCO, if material, include the following:

● the receipt of any entertainment or non-nominal gift by the Senior Officer, or a member of his or her family, from any company with which a Company has current or prospective business dealings (other than the Advisory Group), unless such entertainment or gift is business related, reasonable in cost, appropriate as to time and place, and not so frequent as to raise any question of impropriety;

● any ownership interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, of any of the Companies’ service providers, other than the Advisory Group; or

● a direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, transaction charges or spreads paid by a Company for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest arising from the Senior Officer’s employment by the Advisory Group, such as compensation or equity ownership.

Disclosures

It is the policy of each Company to make full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations in all reports and documents that such Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission or a national securities exchange and in all other public

Revised: July 30, 2014

3

communications made by such Company. As a Senior Officer, you are required to promote compliance with this policy and to abide by such Company’s standards, policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with this policy.    

  Each Senior Officer must:

● familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements applicable to each Company as well as the business and financial operations of each Company; and

● not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about any Company to others, including to the Directors, such Company’s independent auditors, such Company’s counsel, any counsel to the Independent Directors, governmental regulators or self-regulatory organizations.

Compliance With Code Of Ethics

If you know of or suspect a violation of this Code of Ethics or other laws, regulations, policies or procedures applicable to the Company, you must report that information on a timely basis to the CCO or report it anonymously by following the “whistle blower” policies adopted by the Advisory Group from time to time. No one will be subject to retaliation because of a good faith report of a suspected violation.

Each Company will follow these procedures in investigating and enforcing this Code of Ethics, and in reporting on this Code of Ethics:

● the CCO will take all appropriate action to investigate any actual or potential violations reported to him or her;

● violations and potential violations will be reported to the Board of Directors of each affected Company after such investigation;

● if the Board of Directors determines that a violation has occurred, it will take all appropriate disciplinary or preventive action; and

● appropriate disciplinary or preventive action may include a letter of censure, suspension, dismissal or, in the event of criminal or other serious violations of law, notification of the Securities and Exchange Commission or other appropriate law enforcement authorities.

Waivers Of Code Of Ethics

Except as otherwise provided in this Code of Ethics, the CCO is responsible for applying this Code of Ethics to specific situations in which questions are presented to the CCO and has the authority to interpret this Code of Ethics in any particular situation. The CCO shall take all action he or she considers appropriate to investigate any actual or potential violations reported under this Code of Ethics.

Revised: July 30, 2014

4

The CCO is authorized to consult, as appropriate, with counsel to the affected Company, the Advisory Group or the Independent Directors, and is encouraged to do so.

The Board of Directors of the affected Company is responsible for granting waivers of this Code of Ethics, as appropriate. Any changes to or waivers of this Code of Ethics will, to the extent required, be disclosed on Form N-CSR, or otherwise, as provided by Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

Recordkeeping

Each Company will maintain and preserve for a period of not less than six (6) years from the date an action is taken, the first two (2) years in an easily accessible place, a copy of the information or materials supplied to the Boards of Directors pursuant to this Code of Ethics:

● that provided the basis for any amendment or waiver to this Code of Ethics; and

● relating to any violation of this Code of Ethics and sanctions imposed for such violation, together with a written record of the approval or action taken by the relevant Board of Directors.

Confidentiality

All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Code of Ethics shall be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law or this Code of Ethics, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the Independent Directors and their counsel, the Companies and their counsel, the Advisory Group and its counsel and any other advisors, consultants or counsel retained by the Directors, the Independent Directors or any committee of Directors.

Amendments

This Code of Ethics may not be amended as to any Company except in written form, which is specifically approved by a majority vote of the affected Company’s Directors, including a majority of its Independent Directors.

No Rights Created

This Code of Ethics is a statement of certain fundamental principles, policies and procedures that govern each of the Senior Officers in the conduct of the Companies’ business. It is not intended to and does not create any rights in any employee, investor, supplier, competitor, shareholder or any other person or entity.

Revised: July 30, 2014

5

ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM

I have received and read the Joint Code of Ethics for Chief Executive and Senior Financial Officers, and I understand its contents. I agree to comply fully with the standards contained in the Code of Ethics and the Company’s related policies and procedures. I understand that I have an obligation to report any suspected violations of the Code of Ethics on a timely basis to the Chief Compliance Officer or report it anonymously by following the “whistle blower” policies adopted by the Advisory Group from time to time.

Printed Name

Signature

Date

Revised: July 30, 2014

6

EX-99.CERT

Certification Pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act and Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

I, James A. Dinsmore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has

materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   11/27/2018	/s/ James A. Dinsmore
	James A. Dinsmore, Principal Executive Officer

Certification Pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act and Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

I, John C. Ball, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:    11/27/2018	/s/ John C. Ball
	John C. Ball, Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer

EX-99.906CERT

Certification Pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act and Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

I, James A. Dinsmore, Principal Executive Officer of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (the “Registrant”), certify that:

1. The Form N-CSR of the Registrant (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:    11/27/2018	/s/ James A. Dinsmore
	James A. Dinsmore, Principal Executive Officer

I, John C. Ball, Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (the “Registrant”), certify that:

1. The Form N-CSR of the Registrant (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:    11/27/2018	/s/ John C. Ball
	John C. Ball, Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer