XML 49 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Nature of Operations (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Nature of Operations Nature of OperationsBrown & Brown, Inc., a Florida corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Brown & Brown” or the “Company”) is a diversified insurance agency, wholesale brokerage, insurance programs and services organization that markets and sells to its customers, insurance products and services, primarily in the property, casualty and employee benefits areas. Brown & Brown’s business is divided into four reportable segments: the Retail Segment provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public and quasi-public entities, professional and individual customers; the National Programs Segment, acting as a managing general agent (“MGA”), provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals, a range of insurance products for individuals, flood coverage, and targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, governmental entities and market niches, all of which are delivered through a nationwide network of independent agents, including Brown & Brown retail agents; the Wholesale Brokerage Segment markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance, primarily through a nationwide network of independent agents and brokers, as well as Brown & Brown Retail offices; and the Services Segment provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas, as well as Medicare Set-aside services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services, and claims adjusting services.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which provides guidance for accounting for leases. Under ASU 2016-02, the Company will be required to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leased assets with initial maturities greater than one year. In July 2018, the FASB also issued ASU 2018-10 and ASU 2018-11 related to Topic 842. ASU 2018-10 narrows certain aspects of the guidance issued in the amendments within ASU 2016-02. ASU 2018-11 provides entities with an additional transition method to adopt ASU 2016-02. Under this new transition method, at the adoption date, a company shall recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. ASU 2016-02, along with ASU 2018-10 and ASU 2018-11, will take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of this pronouncement with the principal impact expected to be the present value of the remaining lease payments and will be presented as a liability on the balance sheet as well as an asset of similar value representing the “Right of Use” for those leased properties. The Company plans to adopt Topic 842 under the transition method provided by ASU 2018-11. The undiscounted contractual cash payments remaining on leased properties were $213.2 million as of December 31, 2016, $210.4 million as of December 31, 2017 and $210.0 million as of December 31, 2018 as detailed in Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies.”
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract,” which provides guidance for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). ASU 2018-15 will take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In November 2016, the Financial Accountings Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”: Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires that the Statement of Cash Flows explain the changes during the period of cash and cash equivalents inclusive of amounts categorized as restricted cash. ASU 2016-18 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. However, the Company elected to early adopt for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2017 under the full retrospective approach for all periods presented. With the adoption of ASU 2016-18, the change in restricted cash is no longer reflected as a change in operating assets and liabilities, and the Statement of Cash Flows details the changes in the balance of cash and cash equivalents inclusive of restricted cash. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 were previously reported as $375.2 million. With the retrospective adoption, the net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 is now reported as $411.0 million. The Company reflects cash collected from customers that is payable to insurance companies as restricted cash if segregation of this cash is required by the state of domicile for the office conducting this transaction or if required by contract with the relevant insurance company providing coverage. Cash collected from customers that is payable to insurance companies is reported in cash and cash equivalents if no such restriction is required.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-15”), which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified and applies to all entities, including both business entities and not-for-profit entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. ASU 2016-15 became effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2018 and has determined there is no impact
on the Company’s Statement of Cash Flows. The Company already presented cash paid on contingent consideration in business combination as prescribed by ASU 2016-15 and does not, at this time, engage in the other activities being addressed in this ASU.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), which amends guidance issued in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2017, as required. Prior periods have not been adjusted, as the guidance was adopted prospectively. The principal impact is that the tax benefit or expense from stock compensation is now presented in the income tax line of the Statement of Income, whereas the prior treatment was to present this amount as a component of equity on the Balance Sheet. In addition, the tax benefit or expense is now presented as activity in Cash Flow from Operating Activity, rather than the prior presentation as Cash Flow from Financing Activity in the Statement of Cash Flows. The Company also continues to estimate forfeitures of stock grants as allowed by ASU 2016-09.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Principal Versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross Versus Net)” (“ASU 2016-08”) to clarify certain aspects of the principal-versus-agent guidance included in the new revenue standard ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). The FASB issued the ASU in response to concerns identified by stakeholders, including those related to (1) determining the appropriate unit of account under the revenue standard’s principal-versus-agent guidance and (2) applying the indicators of whether an entity is a principal or an agent in accordance with the revenue standard’s control principle. The Company adopted ASU 2016-08 effective contemporaneously with ASU 2014-09 beginning January 1, 2018. The impact of ASU 2016-08 was limited to the claims administering activities of one of our businesses within our Services Segment and therefore was not material to the net income of the Company.
In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”), which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as a single non-current item on the balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted as of the beginning of any interim or annual reporting period. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2017, as required and prior period have been adjusted to reflect this adoption. This reclassification occurred prior to the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which had a material impact on the value of deferred tax items. See Note 10 “Income Taxes” for more information.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“Topic 606”), which provides guidance for revenue recognition. Topic 606 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services.  It supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. The standard’s core principle is that a company should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Effective as of January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014–09, and all related amendments, which established ASC Topic 606. The Company adopted these standards by recognizing the cumulative effect as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at January 1, 2018, under the modified retrospective method for contracts not completed as of the day of adoption. The cumulative impact of adopting Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 was an increase in retained earnings within stockholders’ equity of $117.5 million. Under the modified retrospective method, the Company was not required to restate comparative financial information prior to the adoption of these standards and, therefore, such information presented prior to January 1, 2018 continue to be reported under the Company’s previous accounting policies.
The following areas are impacted by the adoption of Topic 606:
The Company earns commissions and fees paid by insurance carriers for the binding of insurance coverage. These commissions and fees are earned at a point in time upon the effective date of bound insurance coverage, as no performance obligation exists after coverage is bound. If there are other services within the contract, the Company estimates the stand-alone selling price for each separate performance obligation, and the corresponding apportioned revenue is recognized over the period of time in which the customer receives the service, and as the performance obligations are fulfilled and the Company is entitled to that portion of revenue using the output method for the services. In situations where multiple performance obligations exist within a contract, the use of estimates is required to allocate the transaction price on a relative stand-alone selling price basis to each separate performance obligation.
Commission revenues - Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, commission revenues, including those billed on an installment basis, were recognized on the latter of the policy effective date or the date that the premium was billed to the client, with the exception of the Company’s Arrowhead businesses, which followed a policy of recognizing these revenues on the latter of the policy effective date or processed date in our systems.  As a result of the adoption of Topic 606, commission revenues associated with the issuance of policies are now recognized upon the effective date of the associated policy. The overall impact of these changes are not significant on a full-year basis, but the timing of recognizing revenue has impacted our fiscal quarters when compared to prior years. These commission revenues, including those billed on an installment basis, are now recognized earlier than they had been previously. Revenue is now accrued based upon the completion of the performance obligation, thereby creating a current asset for the unbilled revenue, until such time as an invoice is generated, which typically does not exceed twelve months. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the adoption of Topic 606 increased base and incentive commissions
revenue, as defined in Note 2, by $9.9 million compared to what would have been recognized under the Company’s previous accounting policies. Incentive commissions represent a form of variable consideration which includes additional commissions over base commissions received from insurance carriers based on predetermined production levels mutually agreed upon by both parties.
Profit-sharing contingent commissions - Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, revenue that was not fixed and determinable because a contingency existed was not recognized until the contingency was resolved.  Under Topic 606, the Company must estimate the amount of consideration that will be received in the coming year such that a significant reversal of revenue is not probable.  Profit-sharing contingent commissions represent a form of variable consideration associated with the placement of coverage, for which we earn commissions and fees.  In connection with Topic 606, profit-sharing contingent commissions are estimated with a constraint applied and accrued relative to the recognition of the corresponding core commissions.  The resulting effect on the timing of recognizing profit-sharing contingent commissions will now more closely follow a similar pattern as our commissions and fees with any true-ups recognized when payments are received or as additional information that affects the estimate becomes available.  For the year ended December 31, 2018, the adoption of Topic 606 reduced profit-sharing contingent commissions revenue by $2.3 million compared to what would have been recognized under our previous accounting policies.
Fee revenues - The Company earns fee revenue related to services other than securing insurance coverage, which are predominantly in the Company’s National Programs and Services Segments, and to a lesser extent in the large accounts businesses within the Company’s Retail Segment, where the Company receives negotiated fees in lieu of a commission. In accordance with Topic 606, fee revenue from fee agreements are recognized in earlier periods and others in later periods as compared to our previous accounting treatment depending on when the services within the contract are satisfied and when we have transferred control of the related services to the customer. The overall impact of these changes is not significant on a full-year basis, but the timing of recognizing fees revenue will impact our fiscal quarters when compared to prior years. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the adoption of Topic 606 increased fees revenue by $6.2 million compared to what would have been recognized under our previous accounting policies, including a one-time $10.5 million increase for revenues within our Services Segment. Excluding this increase, fee revenues would have decreased by $4.3 million.
Additionally, the Company has evaluated ASC Topic 340 - Other Assets and Deferred Cost (“ASC 340”) which requires companies to defer certain incremental cost to obtain customer contracts, and certain costs to fulfill customer contracts. 
Incremental cost to obtain - The adoption of ASC 340 resulted in the Company deferring certain costs to obtain customer contracts primarily as they relate to commission-based compensation plans in the Retail Segment, in which the Company pays an incremental amount of compensation on new business. These incremental costs are deferred and amortized over a 15-year period, which is consistent with the analysis performed on acquired customer accounts and referenced in Note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For incremental costs with an amortization period of less than 12 months, the costs are expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company deferred $13.7 million of incremental cost to obtain customer contracts. The Company expensed $0.5 million of the incremental cost to obtain customer contracts for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Cost to fulfill - The adoption of ASC 340 resulted in the Company deferring certain costs to fulfill contracts and to recognize these costs as the associated performance obligations are fulfilled. In order for contract fulfillment costs to be deferred under ASC 340, the costs must (1) relate directly to a specific contract or anticipated contract, (2) generate or enhance resources that the Company will use in satisfying its obligations under the contract, and (3) be expected to be recovered through sufficient net cash flows from the contract. The Company does not expect the overall impact of these changes to be significant on a full-year basis, but the timing of recognizing these expenses will impact quarterly results compared to prior years as such recognition better aligns with the associated revenue. With the modified retrospective adoption of Topic 606, the Company deferred $52.7 million in contract fulfillment costs on its opening balance sheet on January 1, 2018 based upon the estimated average time spent on policy renewals. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had net expense of $1.3 million related to the release of previously deferred contract fulfillment costs associated with performance obligations that were satisfied in the period, net of current year deferrals for costs incurred that related to performance obligations yet to be fulfilled.
In connection with the implementation of Topic 606 and ASC 340, we modified, and in some instances instituted, additional accounting procedures, processes and internal controls. While the relative impacts of these standards to our revenue and expense streams are significant during a calendar year, we do not view these modifications and additions as a material change in our internal controls over financial reporting on a full year basis.
The cumulative effect of the changes made to our consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2018 for the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and ASC Topic 340 – Other Assets and Deferred Cost (the “New Revenue Standard”):
(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2017
 
Adjustments due to the New Revenue Standard
 
Balance at January 1, 2018
Balance Sheet
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable
$
546,402

 
$
153,058

 
$
699,460

Other current assets
47,864

 
52,680

 
100,544

 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums payable to insurance companies
685,163

 
12,107

 
697,270

Accounts payable
64,177

 
8,747

 
72,924

Accrued expenses and other liabilities
228,748

 
22,794

 
251,542

Deferred income taxes, net
256,185

 
44,575

 
300,760

 
 
 
 
 
 
Shareholders' Equity:
 
 
 
 
 
Retained earnings
$
2,456,599

 
$
117,515

 
$
2,574,114

The $52.7 million adjustment to other current assets reflects the deferral of certain cost to fulfill contracts. The $12.1 million adjustment to premiums payable to insurance companies reflects the estimated amount payable to outside brokers on unbilled premiums, commissions and fees receivable. The $8.7 million adjustment to accounts payable and the $22.8 million adjustment to accrued expenses and other liabilities consists of commissions payable and deferred revenue, respectively.
The following table illustrates the impact of adopting the New Revenue Standard has had on our reported results in the consolidated statement of income.
 
December 31, 2018
(in thousands)
As reported
 
Impact of adopting the New Revenue Standard
 
Balances without the New Revenue Standard
Statement of Income
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Commissions and fees
$
2,009,857

 
$
18,399

 
$
1,991,458

 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Employee compensation and benefits
1,068,914

 
(8,835
)
 
1,077,749

Other operating expenses
332,118

 
10,621

 
321,497

Income taxes
118,207

 
4,246

 
113,961

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
344,255

 
$
12,367

 
$
331,888