XML 32 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Jan. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Staples leases certain retail and support facilities under long-term non-cancelable lease agreements. Most lease agreements contain renewal options and rent escalation clauses and, in some cases, allow termination within a certain number of years with notice and a fixed payment. Certain agreements provide for contingent rental payments based on sales.
Other long-term obligations at January 30, 2016 include $63 million relating to future rent escalation clauses and lease incentives under certain existing operating lease arrangements. These rent obligations are recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective terms of the leases. Future minimum lease commitments due for retail, distribution, fulfillment and support facilities (including restructured facilities) and equipment leases under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in millions):
Fiscal Year:
Total
2016
$
685

2017
563

2018
424

2019
317

2020
230

Thereafter
443

 
$
2,662


Future minimum lease commitments exclude the impact of $36 million of minimum rentals due under non-cancelable subleases. Rent expense was $691 million, $767 million and $801 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
As of January 30, 2016, Staples had contractual purchase obligations that are not reflected in the Company's consolidated balance sheets totaling $614 million. Many of the Company's purchase commitments may be canceled by the Company without advance notice or payment and, accordingly, the Company has excluded such commitments from the following schedule. Contracts that may be terminated by the Company without cause or penalty, but that require advance notice for termination, are valued on the basis of an estimate of what the Company would owe under the contract upon providing notice of termination. Expected payments related to such purchase obligations are as follows (in millions):
Fiscal Year:
Total
2016
$
460

2017
74

2018
31

2019
43

2020
4

Thereafter
2

 
$
614


Letters of credit are issued by Staples during the ordinary course of business through major financial institutions as required by certain vendor contracts. As of January 30, 2016, Staples had open standby letters of credit totaling $99 million.
Contingencies 
The Company has investigated, with the assistance of outside experts, a data security incident involving unauthorized access into the computer systems of PNI Digital Media Ltd ("PNI"), a subsidiary of the Company, which the Company acquired in July 2014. PNI, which is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, provides a software platform that enables retailers to sell personalized products such as photo prints, photo books, calendars, business cards, stationery and other similar products. PNI’s customers include a number of major third party retailers, as well as affiliates of the Company. The investigation determined that an unauthorized party entered PNI’s systems and was able to deploy malware on some of PNI’s servers supporting its clients. The malware was designed to capture data that end users input on the photosites. Some of PNI's affected customers have notified certain of their users of a potential compromise of the users' payment card information and/or other personal information. PNI took prompt steps to contain the incident, including disabling the retailer photosites or online payment transactions for a period while the incident was being investigated, and to further enhance the security of its retailer customers' data. To date the Company has incurred incremental expenses of $18 million related to the incident. The expenses reflect professional service fees incurred by the Company, as well as claims by PNI's retailer customers. Additional losses and expenses relating to the incident are probable; however, at this stage, we do not have sufficient information to reasonably estimate such losses and expenses. The types of losses and expenses that may result from the incident include, without limitation: claims by PNI’s retailer customers, including indemnification claims for losses and damages incurred by them; claims by end-users of PNI’s services, including class action lawsuits that have been filed, and further class action lawsuits that may be filed, in Canada and the United States; investigations and claims by various regulatory authorities in Canada and the United States; investigation costs; remediation costs; and legal fees. We will continue to evaluate information as it becomes known and will record an estimate for additional losses or expenses at the time or times when it is both probable that any loss has been incurred and the amount of such loss is reasonably estimable. Such losses may be material to our results of operations and financial condition. The Company maintains network security insurance coverage, which the Company expects would help mitigate the financial impact of the incident.

In December 2014, the Company announced that the investigation into its previously announced data security incident had determined that malware deployed by criminals to some point of sale systems at 115 of the Company’s more than 1,400 U.S. retail stores may have allowed access to transaction data at those affected stores. As a result, cardholder names, payment card numbers, expiration dates, and card verification codes for approximately 1.16 million payment cards may have been affected.   Upon detection, the Company immediately took action to eradicate the malware and commenced an investigation into the incident, working closely with payment card companies and law enforcement and with the assistance of outside data security experts. The Company also has taken steps to further enhance the security of its point of sale systems, including the use of new encryption tools. The Company continues to evaluate cybersecurity policies and practices to mitigate the risk of future incidents. Expenses incurred to date related to this incident have not been material. It is reasonably possible that the Company may incur additional expenses or losses in connection with the incident; however, at this time the Company is unable to reasonably estimate any such additional expenses or losses. In addition, the Company maintains network security insurance coverage, which it expects would help mitigate any material financial impact.

In 2013 the Company completed the sale of PSD, recognizing a preliminary loss on disposal of $81 million that was subject to the impact of a working capital adjustment to the purchase price. On April 22, 2015, the purchaser commenced litigation in Amsterdam District Court claiming that it was entitled to a purchase price adjustment of approximately €60 million. On April 22, 2015, the Company made a payment to the purchaser of approximately €4 million (the amount of the purchase price adjustment it believed was appropriate) and the purchaser reduced its claim accordingly. The purchaser further reduced its claim to €52 million in response to expert reports submitted by the Company in the court case. The court held a hearing on December 1, 2015, and on January 13, 2016 it issued a judgment rejecting the purchaser’s claims in their entirety and awarding costs to the Company. The purchaser filed a notice of appeal on February 15, 2016, which the Company intends to vigorously defend. If the purchaser prevails on appeal, it could result in an adjustment, which may be material, to the loss we recorded for the transaction.

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation arising from the operation of its business that is considered routine and incidental to its business. The Company estimates exposures and establishes reserves for amounts that are probable and can be reasonably estimated. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies could be unexpected or differ from the Company’s reserves.  The Company does not believe it is reasonably possible that a loss in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements as of January 30, 2016 would have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial condition.