10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-19019

RadNet, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Delaware	13-3326724
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1510 Cotner Avenue
Los Angeles, California	90025
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(310) 478-7808

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

<>Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨	Accelerated filer  x	Non-accelerated filer  ¨	Smaller reporting company  ¨
		(do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding on May 4, 2012, was 38,225,482 shares.

Table of Contents

RADNET, INC.

INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		Page
ITEM 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months ended March 31, 2012 and  2011	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity Deficit for the Three Months ended March 31, 2012	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011	7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	9
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	36
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	37
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	38
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	38
ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	38
ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	38
ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	38
ITEM 5.	Other Information	38
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	38
SIGNATURES		39
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		40

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,834		$	2,455
Accounts receivable, net		133,971			128,432
Asset held for sale		-			2,300
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		19,859			19,140
Total current assets		155,664			152,327
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET		220,206			215,527
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill		159,593			159,507
Other intangible assets		52,199			53,105
Deferred financing costs, net		12,719			13,490
Investment in joint ventures		22,933			22,326
Deposits and other		2,970			2,906
Total assets	$	626,284		$	619,188
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other	$	111,095		$	103,101
Due to affiliates		3,213			3,762
Deferred revenue		1,162			1,076
Current portion of notes payable		6,243			6,608
Current portion of deferred rent		1,009			999
Current portion of obligations under capital leases		5,458			6,834
Total current liabilities		128,180			122,380
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred rent, net of current portion		12,685			12,407
Deferred taxes		277			277
Line of credit		60,700			58,000
Notes payable, net of current portion		482,575			484,046
Obligations under capital lease, net of current portion		2,267			3,338
Other non-current liabilities		8,128			8,547
Total liabilities		694,812			688,995
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
EQUITY DEFICIT
Common stock - $.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 38,225,482, and 37,426,460 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		4			4
Paid-in-capital		166,971			165,796
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(664	)		(946	)
Accumulated deficit		(235,721	)		(235,610	)
Total Radnet, Inc.'s equity deficit		(69,410	)		(70,756	)
Noncontrolling interests		882			949
Total equity deficit		(68,528	)		(69,807	)
Total liabilities and equity deficit	$	626,284		$	619,188

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
NET SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts	$	168,500		$	144,083
Provision for bad debts		(6,484	)		(5,031	)
Net service fee revenue		162,016			139,052
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of operations		135,400			115,828
Depreciation and amortization		14,892			13,921
Loss on sale and disposal of equipment		24			259
Severance costs		449			145
Total operating expenses		150,765			130,153
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		11,251			8,899
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		13,567			12,915
Other income		(1,147	)		(1,871	)
Total other expenses		12,420			11,044
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURES		(1,169	)		(2,145	)
Provision for income taxes		(245	)		(147	)
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		1,262			1,484
NET LOSS		(152	)		(808	)
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(41	)		68
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(111	)	$	(876	)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.02	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING Basic and diluted		37,669,921			37,257,683

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
NET LOSS	$	(152	)	$	(808	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		6			30
Reclassification of net cash flow hedge losses included in net loss during the period		276			306
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)		130			(472	)
Less comprehensive income (loss) attributible to non-controlling interests		(41	)		68
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTIBLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	89		$	(404	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY DEFICIT

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

(unaudited)

	Common Stock				Paid-in		Accumulated			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Total Radnet, Inc.'s			Noncontrolling			Total
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Loss			Equity Deficit			Interests			Equity Deficit
BALANCE - JANUARY 1, 2012		37,426,460	$	4	$	165,796	$	(235,610	)	$	(946	)	$	(70,756	)	$	949		$	(69,807	)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options/warrants		74,022		-		-		-			-			-			-			-
Stock-based compensation		-		-		1,175		-			-			1,175			-			1,175
Issuance of restricted stock		725,000				-
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		-			-			-			(26	)		(26	)
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment		-		-		-		-			6			6			-			6
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge from prior periods reclassified to earnings		-		-		-		-			276			276			-			276
Net loss		-		-		-		(111	)		-			(111	)		(41	)		(152	)
BALANCE - MARCH 31, 2012		38,225,482	$	4	$	166,971	$	(235,721	)	$	(664	)	$	(69,410	)	$	882		$	(68,528	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  (IN THOUSANDS)

(unaudited)

	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(152	)	$	(808	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		14,892			13,921
Provision for bad debt		6,484			5,031
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		(1,262	)		(1,484	)
Distributions from joint ventures		1,575			1,764
Deferred rent amortization		288			105
Amortization of deferred financing cost		771			748
Amortization of bond discount		65			58
Loss on sale and disposal of equipment		24			259
Amortization of cash flow hedge		276			306
Stock-based compensation		1,175			1,048
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase transactions:
Accounts receivable		(12,023	)		(12,607	)
Other current assets		(683	)		(2,345	)
Other assets		(64	)		51
Deferred revenue		86			(186	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		3,979			9,335
Net cash provided by operating activities		15,431			15,196
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of imaging facilities		(580	)		(6,343	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(13,962	)		(15,616	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		410			235
Proceeds from sale of imaging facilities		2,300			-
Purchase of equity interest in joint ventures		(920	)		(1,500	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(12,752	)		(23,224	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on notes and leases payable		(4,479	)		(6,490	)
Deferred financing costs		-			(218	)
Proceeds from, net of payments on, line of credit		2,700			15,900
Payments to counterparties of interest rate swaps, net of amounts received		(1,500	)		(1,611	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(26	)		(33	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of options/warrants		-			99
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(3,305	)		7,647
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		5			13
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(621	)		(368	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		2,455			627
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	1,834		$	259
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	6,841		$	6,330

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(unaudited)

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

We acquired equipment and certain leasehold improvements for approximately $12.7 million and $7.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that we had not paid for as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The offsetting amount due was recorded in our consolidated balance sheet under accounts payable and accrued expenses.

As discussed in Note 6, we entered into interest rate swap modifications in the first quarter of 2009.  These modifications include a significant financing element and, as such, all cash inflows and outflows subsequent to the date of modification are presented as financing activities.  Also, as a result of our debt refinancing completed on April 6, 2010, our interest rate swaps are no longer effective.  Accordingly, all changes in their fair value after April 6, 2010 are, and will continue to be recognized in earnings as other expense.

Detail of investing activity related to acquisitions can be found in Note 3.

8

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

At March 31, 2012, we operated a group of regional networks comprised of 232 centers, which we operate directly or indirectly through joint ventures located in seven states with operations primarily in California, Maryland, Florida, Delaware, New Jersey, Rhode Island and New York.  We provide diagnostic imaging services including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), nuclear medicine, mammography, ultrasound, diagnostic radiology, or X-ray, fluoroscopy and other related procedures. Our operations comprise a single segment for financial reporting purposes.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Radnet Management, Inc. (or “Radnet Management”) and Beverly Radiology Medical Group III, a professional partnership (“BRMG”).  The consolidated financial statements also include Radnet Management I, Inc., Radnet Management II, Inc.,  Radiologix, Inc., Radnet Managed Imaging Services, Inc., Delaware Imaging Partners, Inc., New Jersey Imaging Partners, Inc. and Diagnostic Imaging Services, Inc. (“DIS”), all wholly owned subsidiaries of Radnet Management.  All of these affiliated entities are referred to collectively as “RadNet”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company” in this report.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 810-10-15-14 stipulates that generally any entity with a) insufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by any parties, or b) equity holders that, as a group, lack the characteristics specified in the Codification which evidence a controlling financial interest, is considered a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”).  We consolidate all voting interest entities in which we own a majority voting interest and all VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary. We determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE through a qualitative analysis that identifies which variable interest holder has the controlling financial interest in the VIE. The variable interest holder who has both of the following has the controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In performing our analysis, we consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: the design and activities of the VIE, the terms of the contracts the VIE has entered into, the nature of the VIE’s variable interests issued and how they were negotiated with or marketed to potential investors, and which parties participated significantly in the design or redesign of the entity.

Howard G. Berger, M.D. is our President and Chief Executive Officer, a member of our Board of Directors and is deemed to be the beneficial owner, directly and indirectly, of approximately 14.1% of our outstanding common stock as of March 31, 2012. Dr. Berger also owns, indirectly, 99% of the equity interests in BRMG. BRMG provides all of the professional medical services at the majority of our facilities located in California under a management agreement with us, and employs physicians or contracts with various other independent physicians and physician groups to provide the professional medical services at most of our other California facilities. We generally obtain professional medical services from BRMG in California, rather than provide such services directly or through subsidiaries, in order to comply with California’s prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine. However, as a result of our close relationship with Dr. Berger and BRMG, we believe that we are able to better ensure that medical service is provided at our California facilities in a manner consistent with our needs and expectations and those of our referring physicians, patients and payers than if we obtained these services from unaffiliated physician groups. BRMG is a partnership of ProNet Imaging Medical Group, Inc., Breastlink Medical Group, Inc. and Beverly Radiology Medical Group, Inc., each of which are 99% or 100% owned by Dr. Berger.  RadNet provides non-medical, technical and administrative services to BRMG for which it receives a management fee, pursuant to the terms of the management agreement.  Through the management agreement and our relationship with Dr. Berger, we have exclusive authority over all non-medical decision making related to the ongoing business operations of BRMG. Through our management agreement with BRMG we determine the annual budget of BRMG and make all physician employment decisions.  BRMG has insignificant operating assets and liabilities, and de minimis equity.  Through the management agreement with us, all of BRMG’s cash flows are transferred to us.  We have determined that BRMG is a variable interest entity, and that we are the primary beneficiary, and consequently, we consolidate the revenue and expenses of BRMG. BRMG recognized $12.7 million and $12.7 million of revenue, net of management service fees to RadNet, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $12.7 million and $12.7 million of operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  RadNet recognized $50.4 million and $47.8 million of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for management services provided to BRMG relating primarily to the technical portion of total billed revenue.  The cash flows of BRMG are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

9

The creditors of BRMG do not have recourse to our general credit and there are no other arrangements that could expose us to losses.  However, BRMG is managed to recognize no net income or net loss and, therefore, RadNet may be required to provide financial support to cover any operating expenses in excess of operating revenues.

Aside from centers in California where we contract with BRMG for the provision of professional medical services and consolidate 100% of the patient service revenue, at the remaining centers in California and at all of the centers which are located outside of California, we have entered into long-term contracts with independent radiology groups in the area to provide physician services at those facilities.  These third party radiology practices provide professional services, including supervision and interpretation of diagnostic imaging procedures, in our diagnostic imaging centers.  The radiology practices maintain full control over the provision of professional services. The contracted radiology practices generally have outstanding physician and practice credentials and reputations; strong competitive market positions; a broad sub-specialty mix of physicians; a history of growth and potential for continued growth.  In these facilities we enter into long-term agreements with radiology practice groups (typically 40 years). Under these arrangements, we provide management services and receive a fee which includes 100% of the technical reimbursements associated with imaging procedures for the use of our diagnostic imaging equipment and the provision of technical services.  Our management service fees also include a portion of the practice group’s professional revenue, including revenue derived outside of our diagnostic imaging centers as well as fees for administrative services. The radiology practice groups retain the professional reimbursements associated with imaging procedures after deducting management service fees paid to us.  We have no financial controlling interest in the independent (non-BRMG) radiology practices; accordingly, we do not consolidate the financial statements of those practices in our consolidated financial statements and record only our management service fee revenue.

 The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles complete financial statements; however, in the opinion of our management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 have been made. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Significant accounting policies

As of the period covered in this report, there have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies we use, and have explained, in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 with the exception of the following:

Revenues

Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts, consists of net patient fees received from various payers and patients themselves based mainly upon established contractual billing rates, less allowances for contractual adjustments.  As it relates to BRMG centers, this service fee revenue includes payments for both the professional medical interpretation revenue recognized by BRMG as well as the payment for all other aspects related to our providing the imaging services, for which we earn management fees from BRMG.  As it relates to non-BRMG centers, this service fee revenue  is earned through providing the administration of the non-medical functions relating to the professional medical practice at our non-BRMG centers, including among other functions, provision of clerical and administrative personnel, bookkeeping and accounting services, billing and collection, provision of medical and office supplies, secretarial, reception and transcription services, maintenance of medical records, and advertising, marketing and promotional activities.

Service fee revenues are recorded during the period the patient services are provided based upon the estimated amounts due from the patients and third-party payers. Third-party payers include federal and state agencies (under the Medicare and Medicaid programs), managed care health plans, commercial insurance companies and employers. Estimates of contractual allowances under managed care health plans are based upon the payment terms specified in the related contractual agreements. Contractual payment terms in managed care agreements are generally based upon predetermined rates per discounted fee-for-service rates. We also record a provision for doubtful accounts (based primarily on historical collection experience) related to patients and copayment and deductible amounts for patients who have health care coverage under one of our third-party payers.

10

Our service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts less the provision for bad debts for the three months ended March 31, are summarized in the following table (in thousands):

	2012			2011
Commercial Insurance	$	93,518		$	79,390
Managed Care Capitated Payors		24,770			21,612
Medicare		33,026			28,384
Medicaid		5,729			4,899
Other		11,458			9,798
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts		168,500			144,083
Provision for bad debts		(6,484	)		(5,031	)
Net service fee revenue	$	162,016		$	139,052

The break-out of our service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts, is calculated based upon global payments received from consolidated imaging centers from dates of service from each respective period illustrated.

Provision for Bad Debts

Although outcomes vary, our policy is to attempt to collect amounts due from patients, including co-payments and deductibles due from patients with insurance, at the time of service. We provide for an allowance against accounts receivable that could become uncollectible by establishing an allowance to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. We estimate this allowance based on the aging of our accounts receivable by each type of payer over an 18-month look-back period, and other relevant factors. A significant portion of our provision for bad debt relates to co-payments and deductibles owed to us by patients with insurance. There are various factors that can impact collection trends, such as changes in the economy, which in turn have an impact on the increased burden of co-payments and deductibles to be made by patients with insurance. These factors continuously change and can have an impact on collection trends and our estimation process.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the three months ended March 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to conform with the three months ended March 31, 2012 presentation. Additionally, we have adjusted prior year’s presentation as a result of the adoption of ASU 2011-07, Health Care Entities (Topic 954). In connection with this adjustment, we identified certain mechanical errors in our historical calculation of the provision for bad debts, resulting in the gross up of the provision for bad debts and revenues by $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The error has been corrected in these financial statements and upon adoption of the new guidance, resulted in no impact to net service fee revenue.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had a working capital balance of $27.5 million and $30.0 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  We had a net loss attributable to RadNet, Inc.’s common stockholders of $111,000 and $876,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  We also had an equity deficit of $68.5 million and $69.8 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

We operate in a capital intensive, high fixed-cost industry that requires significant amounts of capital to fund operations.  In addition to operations, we require a significant amount of capital for the initial start-up and development expense of new diagnostic imaging facilities, the acquisition of additional facilities and new diagnostic imaging equipment.  Because our cash flows from operations have been insufficient to fund all of these capital requirements, we have depended on the availability of financing under credit arrangements with third parties.

Our business strategy with regard to operations focuses on the following:

· maximizing performance at our existing facilities;

· focusing on profitable contracting;

· expanding MRI, CT and PET applications;

· optimizing operating efficiencies; and

· expanding our networks.

11

On April 6, 2010, we completed a series of transactions which we refer to as our "debt refinancing plan" for an aggregate of $585.0 million.  As part of the debt refinancing plan, our wholly owned subsidiary Radnet Management, Inc. issued and sold $200.0 million in 10 3/8% senior notes due 2018 (the "senior notes"). All payments of the senior notes, including principal and interest, are guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior unsecured basis by RadNet, Inc. and all of Radnet Management’s current and future domestic wholly owned restricted subsidiaries. The senior notes were issued under an indenture, dated April 6, 2010, by and among Radnet Management, as issuer, RadNet, Inc., as parent guarantor, the subsidiary guarantors thereof and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, in a private placement that was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  We subsequently exchanged the senior notes initially issued on April 6, 2010 in a private placement for publicly registered exchange notes with nearly identical terms.  The exchange offer was completed on February 14, 2011.

In addition to the issuance of senior notes, Radnet Management entered into a new Credit and Guaranty Agreement with a syndicate of lenders (the "New Credit Agreement"), whereby Radnet Management obtained $385.0 million in senior secured first-lien bank financing, consisting of (i) a $285.0 million, six-year term loan facility and (ii) a $100.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a swing line subfacility and a letter of credit subfacility (collectively, the “New Credit Facilities”). Radnet Management’s obligations under the New Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by RadNet, Inc., all of Radnet Management’s current and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries as well as certain affiliates, including Beverly Radiology Medical Group III and its equity holders (Beverly Radiology Medical Group, Inc., BreastLink Medical Group, Inc. and ProNet Imaging Medical Group, Inc.). These New Credit Facilities created by the New Credit Agreement are secured by a perfected first-priority security interest in all of Radnet Management’s and the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets, including, but not limited to, pledges of equity interests of Radnet Management and all of our current and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries.

In connection with the issuance of the outstanding senior notes and entering into the New Credit Agreement, Radnet Management used the net proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes and the New Credit Facilities created by the New Credit Agreement to repay in full its existing first lien term loan for $242.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding, which would have matured on November 15, 2012, and its second lien term loan for $170.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding, which would have matured on November 15, 2013.

On November 8, 2011, in conjunction with our acquisition of the U.S. imaging operations of CML HealthCare Inc. (RH), we increased the size of our revolving credit facility by $21.25 million, to $121.25 million of total borrowing capacity (the “Incremental Commitments”).  The increased facility size will provide additional borrowing availability to fund further acquisitions and general working capital needs.

At March 31, 2012, we had $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes outstanding, $279.3 million of senior secured term loan debt outstanding and $60.7 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility.  We had $60.55 million of available credit under our revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing conditions under that facility as further described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants under the New Credit Facilities and the senior notes.

NOTE 2 — SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION

The following tables present unaudited interim condensed consolidating financial information for: (a) RadNet, Inc. (the “Parent”) on a stand-alone basis as a guarantor of the senior secured term loan due 2016 and the senior notes due 2018 ; (b) Radnet Management, Inc., the subsidiary issuer (the “Subsidiary Issuer”) of the senior secured term loan due 2016 and the senior notes due 2018; (c) on a combined basis, the guarantor subsidiaries (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) of the senior secured term loan due 2016 and the senior notes due 2018, which include all other 100% owned subsidiaries of the Subsidiary Issuer; (d) on a combined basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries, which include joint venture partnerships of which the Subsidiary Issuer holds investments of 50% or greater, as well as BRMG, which we consolidate as a variable interest entity. Separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Issuer or the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because the guarantee by the Parent and each Guarantor Subsidiary is full and unconditional, joint and several. In lieu thereof, the Parent includes the following:

12

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

March 31, 2012

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	-		$	881	$	953	$	-		$	1,834
Accounts receivable, net		-			-			77,300		56,671		-			133,971
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		-			10,572			8,194		1,093		-			19,859
Total current assets		-			10,572			86,375		58,717		-			155,664
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET		-			47,014			172,378		814		-			220,206
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill		-			42,871			115,878		844		-			159,593
Other intangible assets		-			33			52,034		132		-			52,199
Deferred financing costs, net		-			12,719			-		-		-			12,719
Investment in subsidiaries		(69,410	)		256,851			9,898		-		(197,339	)		-
Investment in joint ventures		-			-			22,933		-		-			22,933
Deposits and other		-			1,298			1,672		-		-			2,970
Total assets	$	(69,410	)	$	371,358		$	461,168	$	60,507	$	(197,339	)	$	626,284
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Intercompany	$	-		$	(166,883	)	$	124,700	$	42,183	$	-		$	-
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			58,710			44,841		7,544		-			111,095
Due to affiliates		-			-			3,213		-		-			3,213
Deferred revenue		-			-			1,162		-		-			1,162
Current portion of notes payable		-			2,953			3,290		-		-			6,243
Current portion of deferred rent		-			506			503		-		-			1,009
Current portion of obligations under capital leases		-			2,597			2,861		-		-			5,458
Total current liabilities		-			(102,117	)		180,570		49,727		-			128,180
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred rent, net of current portion		-			7,766			4,919		-		-			12,685
Deferred taxes		-			-			277		-		-			277
Line of credit		-			60,700			-		-		-			60,700
Notes payable, net of current portion		-			473,562			9,013		-		-			482,575
Obligations under capital leases,net of current portion		-			857			1,410		-		-			2,267
Other non-current liabilities		-			-			8,128		-		-			8,128
Total liabilities		-			440,768			204,317		49,727		-			694,812
EQUITY DEFICIT
Total Radnet, Inc.'s equity deficit		(69,410	)		(69,410	)		256,851		9,898		(197,339	)		(69,410	)
Noncontrolling interests		-			-			-		882		-			882
Total equity deficit		(69,410	)		(69,410	)		256,851		10,780		(197,339	)		(68,528	)
Total liabilities and equity deficit	$	(69,410	)	$	371,358		$	461,168	$	60,507	$	(197,339	)	$	626,284

13

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

 December 31, 2011

(in thousands)

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	1,366		$	-	$	1,089	$	-		$	2,455
Accounts receivable, net		-			-			78,229		50,203		-			128,432
Asset held for sale		-			-			2,300		-		-			2,300
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		-			11,858			6,651		631		-			19,140
Total current assets		-			13,224			87,180		51,923		-			152,327
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET		-			46,445			168,213		869		-			215,527
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill		-			42,784			115,878		845		-			159,507
Other intangible assets		-			50			52,916		139		-			53,105
Deferred financing costs, net		-			13,490			-		-		-			13,490
Investment in subsidiaries		(70,756	)		249,763			9,974		-		(188,981	)		-
Investment in joint ventures		-			-			22,326		-		-			22,326
Deposits and other		-			1,279			1,627		-		-			2,906
Total assets	$	(70,756	)	$	367,035		$	458,114	$	53,776	$	(188,981	)	$	619,188
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Intercompany	$	-		$	(160,017	)	$	124,679	$	35,338	$	-		$	-
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			50,262			45,324		7,515		-			103,101
Due to affiliates		-			-			3,762		-		-			3,762
Deferred revenue		-			-			1,076		-		-			1,076
Current portion of notes payable		-			2,981			3,627		-		-			6,608
Current portion of deferred rent		-			502			497		-		-			999
Current portion of obligations under capital leases		-			2,996			3,838		-		-			6,834
Total current liabilities		-			(103,276	)		182,803		42,853		-			122,380
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred rent, net of current portion		-			7,734			4,673		-		-			12,407
Deferred taxes		-			-			277		-		-			277
Line of credit		-			58,000			-		-		-			58,000
Notes payable, net of current portion		-			474,165			9,881		-		-			484,046
Obligations under capital leases,net of current portion		-			1,168			2,170		-		-			3,338
Other non-current liabilities		-			-			8,547		-		-			8,547
Total liabilities		-			437,791			208,351		42,853		-			688,995
EQUITY DEFICIT
Total Radnet, Inc.'s equity deficit		(70,756	)		(70,756	)		249,763		9,974		(188,981	)		(70,756	)
Noncontrolling interests		-			-			-		949		-			949
Total equity deficit		(70,756	)		(70,756	)		249,763		10,923		(188,981	)		(69,807	)
Total liabilities and equity deficit	$	(70,756	)	$	367,035		$	458,114	$	53,776	$	(188,981	)	$	619,188

14

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For The Three Months Ended  March 31, 2012

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
NET SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts	$	-		$	34,544		$	119,581		$	14,375		$	-		$	168,500
Provision for bad debts		-			(1,267	)		(4,598	)		(619	)		-			(6,484	)
Net service fee revenue		-			33,277			114,983			13,756			-			162,016
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of operations		-			30,386			91,505			13,509			-			135,400
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,147			11,683			62			-			14,892
Loss on sale of equipment		-			137			(113	)		-			-			24
Severance costs		-			33			390			26			-			449
Total operating expenses		-			33,703			103,465			13,597			-			150,765
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		-			(426	)		11,518			159			-			11,251
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		-			7,978			5,589			-			-			13,567
Other expenses (income)		-			(1,213	)		66			-			-			(1,147	)
Total other expenses		-			6,765			5,655			-			-			12,420
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURES		-			(7,191	)		5,863			159			-			(1,169	)
Provision for income taxes		-			(2	)		(243	)		-			-			(245	)
Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries		(111	)		7,082			200			-			(7,171	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			1,262			-			-			1,262
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(111	)		(111	)		7,082			159			(7,171	)		(152	)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			(41	)		-			(41	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC.COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(111	)	$	(111	)	$	7,082		$	200		$	(7,171	)	$	(111	)

15

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For The Three Months Ended  March 31, 2011

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
NET SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts	$	-		$	31,116		$	97,839		$	15,128		$	-		$	144,083
Provision for bad debts		-			(991	)		(3,488	)		(552	)		-			(5,031	)
Net service fee revenue		-			30,125			94,351			14,576			-			139,052
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of operations		-			26,728			75,112			13,988			-			115,828
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,496			10,315			110			-			13,921
Loss on sale of equipment		-			87			172			-			-			259
Severance costs		-			69			76			-			-			145
Total operating expenses		-			30,380			85,675			14,098			-			130,153
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		-			(255	)		8,676			478			-			8,899
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		-			7,319			5,578			18			-			12,915
Other income		-			(1,871	)		-			-			-			(1,871	)
Total other expenses		-			5,448			5,578			18			-			11,044
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURES		-			(5,703	)		3,098			460			-			(2,145	)
Provision for income taxes		-			(13	)		(132	)		(2	)		-			(147	)
Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries		(876	)		4,840			390			-			(4,354	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			1,484			-			-			1,484
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(876	)		(876	)		4,840			458			(4,354	)		(808	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			68			-			68
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC.COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(876	)	$	(876	)	$	4,840		$	390		$	(4,354	)	$	(876	)

16

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For The Three Months Ended  March 31, 2012

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net income (loss)	$	(111	)	$	(111	)	$	7,082		$	159		$	(7,171	)	$	(152	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,147			11,683			62			-			14,892
Provision for bad debts		-			1,267			4,598			619			-			6,484
Equity in (earnings) loss of consolidated subsidiaries		111			(7,082	)		(200	)		-			7,171			-
Distributions from consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			276			-			(276	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			(1,262	)		-			-			(1,262	)
Distributions from joint ventures		-			-			1,575			-			-			1,575
Deferred rent amortization		-			36			252			-			-			288
Amortization of deferred financing cost		-			771			-			-			-			771
Amortization of bond discount		-			65			-			-			-			65
Loss (gain) on sale of equipment		-			137			(113	)		-			-			24
Amortization of cash flow hedge		-			276			-			-			-			276
Stock-based compensation		-			294			881			-			-			1,175
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase transactions:
Accounts receivable		-			-			(3,014	)		(9,009	)		-			(12,023	)
Other current assets		-			1,286			(1,472	)		(497	)		-			(683	)
Other assets		-			(19	)		(45	)		-			-			(64	)
Deferred revenue		-			-			86			-			-			86
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			3,175			(8,028	)		8,832			-			3,979
Net cash provided by operating activities		-			3,242			12,299			166			(276	)		15,431
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of imaging facilities		-			-			(580	)		-			-			(580	)
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(4,445	)		(9,517	)		-			-			(13,962	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		-			43			367			-			-			410
Proceeds from sale of imaging facilities		-			-			2,300			-			-			2,300
Purchase of equity interest in joint ventures		-			-			(920	)		-			-			(920	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(4,402	)		(8,350	)		-			-			(12,752	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on notes and leases payable		-			(1,406	)		(3,073	)		-			-			(4,479	)
Deferred financing costs		-			-			-			-			-			-
Proceeds from, net of payments on, line of credit		-			2,700			-			-			-			2,700
Payments to counterparties of interest rate swaps, net of amounts received		-			(1,500	)		-			-			-			(1,500	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			(302	)		276			(26	)
Net cash used in financing activities		-			(206	)		(3,073	)		(302	)		276			(3,305	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH								5			-						5
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		-			(1,366	)		881			(136	)		-			(621	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		-			1,366			-			1,089			-			2,455
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	-		$	-		$	881		$	953		$	-		$	1,834

17

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For The Three Months Ended  March 31, 2011

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net income (loss)	$	(876	)	$	(876	)	$	4,840		$	458		$	(4,354	)	$	(808	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,496			10,315			110			-			13,921
Provision for bad debts		-			991			3,489			551			-			5,031
Equity in (earnings) loss of consolidated subsidiaries		876			(4,840	)		(390	)		-			4,354			-
Distributions from consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			344			-			(344	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			(1,484	)		-			-			(1,484	)
Distributions from joint ventures		-			-			1,764			-			-			1,764
Deferred rent amortization		-			69			36			-			-			105
Amortization of deferred financing cost		-			748			-			-			-			748
Amortization of bond discount		-			58			-			-			-			58
Loss on sale of equipment		-			87			172			-			-			259
Amortization of cash flow hedge		-			306			-			-			-			306
Stock-based compensation		-			262			786			-			-			1,048
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase transactions:
Accounts receivable		-			-			(7,746	)		(4,861	)		-			(12,607	)
Other current assets		-			(981	)		(981	)		(383	)		-			(2,345	)
Other assets		-			41			10			-			-			51
Deferred revenue		-			-			(186	)		-			-			(186	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			(8,679	)		13,167			4,847			-			9,335
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		-			(9,318	)		24,136			722			(344	)		15,196
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of imaging facilities		-			-			(6,343	)		-			-			(6,343	)
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(3,167	)		(11,830	)		(619	)		-			(15,616	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		-			-			235			-			-			235
Purchase of equity interest in joint ventures		-			-			(1,500	)		-			-			(1,500	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(3,167	)		(19,438	)		(619	)		-			(23,224	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on notes and leases payable		-			(1,890	)		(4,515	)		(85	)		-			(6,490	)
Deferred financing costs		-			(218	)		-			-			-			(218	)
Proceeds from, net of payments on, line of credit		-			15,900			-			-			-			15,900
Payments to counterparties of interest rate swaps, net of amounts received		-			(1,611	)		-			-			-			(1,611	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			(377	)		344			(33	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			99			-			-			-			99
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		-			12,280			(4,515	)		(462	)		344			7,647
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH								13			-						13
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		-			(205	)		196			(359	)		-			(368	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		-			205			-			422			-			627
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,  end of period	$	-		$	-		$	196		$	63		$	-		$	259

18

NOTE 3 – FACILITY ACQUISITIONS

On February 29, 2012, we completed the acquisition of a multi modality imaging center from TODIC, L.P. located in Camarillo, California for cash consideration of $350,000 and the assumption of a $121,000 capital lease liability. The facility provides MRI, CT, mammography, ultrasound and X-ray services. We have made a fair value determination of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and approximately $425,000 of fixed assets and $86,000 of goodwill was recorded with respect to this transaction as well as the assumption of approximately $40,000 of accrued liabilities.

On February 29, 2012, we completed the acquisition of a multi modality imaging center from Progressive MRI, LLC located in Frederick, Maryland for cash consideration of $230,000. The facility provides MRI, CT, mammography, ultrasound and X-ray services. We have made a fair value determination of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and approximately $230,000 of fixed assets was recorded with respect to this transaction.

NOTE 4 – RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) (“ASU 2011-04”), which contains amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosures in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 explains how to measure fair value for financial reporting. The guidance does not require fair value measurements in addition to those already required or permitted by other Topics. This ASU was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which updates existing guidance on comprehensive income. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income, which was our previous presentation. It requires companies to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two statement approach which we have adopted, the first statement presents total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that presents total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income and the total of comprehensive income. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any effect on our financial condition or results of operations, though it did change our financial statement presentation.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-07, “Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation and Disclosure of Patient Service Revenue, Provision for Bad Debts, and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for Certain Health Care Entities,” which requires health care entities to present the provision for doubtful accounts relating to patient service revenue as a deduction from patient service revenue in the statement of operations rather than as an operating expense. Additional disclosures relating to sources of patient revenue and the allowance for doubtful accounts related to patient accounts receivable are also required. Such additional disclosures are included in Note 1. The adoption of this ASU had no impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, although it did change our financial statement presentation.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment”, simplifying how a company is required to test goodwill for impairment. Companies will now have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the company determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.

19

NOTE 5 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding, net of common stock held in treasury,  as follows (in thousands except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2012			2011
Net loss attributable to Radnet, Inc.'s common stockholders	$	(111	)	$	(876	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year		37,669,921			37,257,683
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to Radnet, Inc.'s common stockholders	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.02	)

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we excluded all options and warrants in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their effect is anti-dilutive.

NOTE 6 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations.  The primary risk managed by us using derivative instruments is interest rate risk.  We have in the past entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk exposure.  The interest rate swap agreements utilized by us effectively modified our exposure to interest rate risk by converting our floating-rate debt to a fixed rate basis during the period of the interest rate swap, thus reducing the impact of interest-rate changes on future interest expense.

At inception, we designated our interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of floating-rate borrowings.  In accordance with ASC Topic 815, derivatives that have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedging instruments are reported at fair value. The gain or loss on the effective portion of the hedge (i.e., change in fair value) is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statement of equity deficit. The remaining gain or loss, if any, is recognized currently in earnings. Unrealized gain or loss on the change in fair value of interest rate swaps that do not qualify as hedges are recognized in earnings.

As a result of our refinancing and the New Credit Agreement and the issuance of the senior notes completed on April 6, 2010, our interest rate swaps do not match the terms of our current bank debt and so accordingly, we have determined that they are no longer designated as cash flow hedges.  Accordingly, all changes in their fair value after April 6, 2010 are, and will continue to be recognized in earnings.  As of April 6, 2010, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a negative $10.4 million.

The related Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCL) of $3.1 million associated with the negative fair values of these interest rate swaps on April 6, 2010, the date of our refinancing, is being amortized on a straight-line basis to interest expense through November 15, 2012, the maturity date of these cash flow hedges.  From April 6, 2010 to March 31, 2012, approximately $2.5 million of AOCL was amortized to interest expense bringing the remaining balance of AOCL to approximately $643,000 at March 31, 2012.

At March 31, 2012 the negative fair value of these interest rate swaps was $3.9 million and was classified as other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recognized approximately $1.2 million in other income related to the change in fair value of these interest rate swaps.

20

A tabular presentation of the fair value of derivative instruments as of December 31, 2011 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value – Asset (Liability) Derivatives
Derivatives
Interest rate contracts	Other non-current liabilities	$(5,064)

A tabular presentation of the fair value of derivative instruments as of March 31, 2012 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value – Asset (Liability) Derivatives
Derivatives
Interest rate contracts	Other non-current liabilities	$ (3,851)

A tabular presentation of the effect of derivative instruments on our statement of operations is as follows (amounts in thousands):

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Ineffective Interest Rate Swap	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Interest rate contracts	None	$1,213	Other income/ (expense)	*   ($276)	Interest income/(expense)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Ineffective Interest Rate Swap	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Interest rate contracts	None	$1,371	Other income/ (expense)	*   ($306)	Interest income/(expense)

  *    Amortization of OCI associated with the cash flow hedges through April 6, 2010 (see discussion above).

NOTE 7 – INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

We have nine unconsolidated joint ventures with ownership interests ranging from 35% to 50%. These joint ventures represent partnerships with hospitals, health systems or radiology practices and were formed for the purpose of owning and operating diagnostic imaging centers.  Professional services at the joint venture diagnostic imaging centers are performed by contracted radiology practices or a radiology practice that participates in the joint venture.  Our investment in these joint ventures is accounted for under the equity method.   Investment in joint ventures increased approximately $607,000 to $22.9 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $22.3 million at December 31, 2011.  This increase is primarily related to additional equity contributions made to one of these joint ventures of approximately $920,000 as well as our recording of equity earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of approximately $1.3 million.   Offsetting this increase is our respective share of distributions received during the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $1.6 million.  

We received management service fees from the centers underlying these joint ventures of approximately $1.9 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and eliminated the uncollected portion of the fees earned associated with our ownership from our net revenue with an offsetting increase to our equity earnings.

21

The following table is a summary of key financial data for these joint ventures as of March 31, 2012 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

Balance Sheet Data:	March 31, 2012
Current assets	$	16,437
Noncurrent assets		42,622
Current liabilities		(9,340	)
Noncurrent liabilities		(8,342	)
Total net assets	$	41,377
Book value of Radnet joint venture interests	$	19,122
Cost in excess of book value of acquired joint venture interests		3,511
Elimination of intercompany profit remaining on Radnet's consolidated balance sheet		300
Total value of Radnet joint venture interests	$	22,933
Total book value of other joint venture partner interests	$	22,255
Income Statement Data for the three months ended March 31,		2012			2011
Net revenue	$	21,076		$	19,004
Net income	$	2,533		$	3,239

NOTE 8 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Options and Warrants

We have two long-term incentive plans that currently have outstanding stock options which we refer to as the 2000 Plan and the 2006 Plan. The 2000 Plan was terminated as to future grants when the 2006 Plan was approved by the stockholders in 2006.  As of March 31, 2012, we have reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan 11,000,000 shares of common stock. Certain options granted under the 2006 Plan to employees are intended to qualify as incentive stock options under existing tax regulations. In addition, we may issue non-qualified stock options and warrants under the 2006 Plan from time to time to non-employees, in connection with acquisitions and for other purposes and we may also issue stock under the 2006 Plan. Stock options and warrants generally vest over two to five years and expire five to ten years from date of grant.

As of March 31, 2012, 4,729,750, or approximately 72.8%, of the 6,496,250 outstanding stock options and warrants granted under our option plans are fully vested.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we did not grant options or warrants under the 2006 Plan.

We have issued warrants outside the 2006 Plan under various types of arrangements to employees, and in exchange for outside services.  All warrants issued to employees or consultants after our February 2007 listing on the NASDAQ Global Market have been characterized as awards under the 2006 Plan.  All warrants outside the 2006 Plan have been issued with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The warrants expire from five to seven years from the date of grant.  Vesting terms are determined by the board of directors or the compensation committee of the board of directors at the date of grant.

As of March 31, 2012, 1,502,898, or 100%, of all the outstanding warrants outside the 2006 Plan are fully vested.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we did not grant warrants outside of our 2006 Plan.

22

The following summarizes all of our option and warrant transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

Outstanding Options and Warrants Under the 2006 Plan and 2000 Plan	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise price Per Common Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic
Balance, December 31, 2011		6,656,250		$	3.62
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Canceled or expired		(160,000	)		4.65
Balance, March 31, 2012		6,496,250			3.60		2.67	$	2,791,475
Exercisable at March 31, 2012		4,729,750			3.64		2.35		2,103,575

Non-Plan Outstanding Warrants	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise price Per Common Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance, December 31, 2011		2,502,898		$	2.58
Granted		-			-
Exercised		(250,000	)		2.52
Canceled or expired		(750,000	)		4.77
Balance, March 31, 2012		1,502,898			1.50		1.40	$	2,528,170
Exercisable at March 31, 2012		1,502,898			1.50		1.40		2,528,170

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (the difference between our closing stock price on March 31, 2012 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holder had all option holders exercised their options on March 31, 2012. Total intrinsic value of options and warrants exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $265,000 and $189,075, respectively.  As of March 31, 2012, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested employee awards was approximately $2.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.8 years.

Restricted Stock Awards

The 2006 Plan permits the award of restricted stock.  On January 3, 2012, we granted 525,000 restricted stock awards (“awards”) to certain employees and 200,000 awards to non-employee directors of the Company. Of the awards granted, 241,667 were vested on the award date, 241,667 cliff vest after one year provided that the employees or non-employees remain continuously employed or engaged through the vesting date and 241,667 cliff vest after two years provided that the employees or non-employees remain continuously employed or engaged through the vesting date. We valued the award based on the closing market price of our stock on January 3, 2012 which was $2.17 per share.

At March 31, 2012, the total unrecognized fair value of these restricted stock awards was approximately $918,000, which will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of 1.75 years.

In sum, of the 11,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan, 7,221,250 are outstanding with respect to grants of options, warrants and restricted stock and 3,778,750 are available for grant.

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements are required to be disclosed within a fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of inputs used to determine fair value. Accordingly, assets and liabilities carried at, or permitted to be carried at, fair value are classified within the fair value hierarchy in one of the following categories based on the lowest level input that is significant to a fair value measurement:

Level 1—Fair value is determined by using unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

23

Level 2—Fair value is determined by using inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable. Inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in inactive markets. Related inputs can also include those used in valuation or other pricing models such as interest rates and yield curves that can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3—Fair value is determined by using inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. Use of these inputs involves significant and subjective judgment.

The table below summarizes the estimated fair values of certain of our financial liabilities that are subject to fair value measurements, and the classification of these liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, as follows (in thousands):

	As of March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:
Interest Rate Swaps	$	-	$	3,851	$	-	$	3,851

	As of December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:
Interest Rate Swaps	$	-	$	5,064	$	-	$	5,064

The estimated fair value of these swaps, which are discussed in Note 6, was determined using Level 2 inputs.  More specifically, the fair value was determined by calculating the value of the difference between the fixed interest rate of the interest rate swaps and the counterparty’s forward LIBOR curve, which would be the input used in the valuations.  The forward LIBOR curve is readily available in the public markets or can be derived from information available in the public markets.

The table below summarizes the estimated fair value and carrying amount of our long-term debt follows (in thousands):

	As of March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value		Total Carrying Value
Senior Secured Term Loan		-		278,602		-		278,602		279,300
Senior Notes		-		199,500		-		199,500		200,000

	As of December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Total Carrying Value
Senior Secured Term Loan		-		264,600		-		264,600		280,000
Senior Notes		-		180,000		-		180,000		200,000

The estimated fair value of our long-term debt, which is discussed in Note 1, was determined using Level 2 inputs primarily related to comparable market prices

We consider the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, other current assets and current liabilities to approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization or payment.  Additionally, we consider the carrying amount of our capital lease obligations to approximate their fair value because the weighted average interest rate used to formulate the carrying amounts approximates current market rates.

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 10, 2012, we completed our acquisition of West Coast Radiology, which consists of five multi-modality imaging centers in Orange County, California, for cash consideration of $8.1 million and the assumption of approximately $1.4 million of capital lease debt. The centers are located in Anaheim, Santa Ana/Tustin, Irvine and Mission Viejo/Laguna Niguel and operate a combination of MRI, CT, ultrasound, mammography, x-ray and other related modalities. 

24

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and are based on our currently available financial, economic and competitive data and on current business plans.  Actual events or results may differ materially depending on risks and uncertainties that may affect our operations, markets, services, prices and other factors.

Statements in quarterly report concerning our ability to successfully acquire and integrate new operations, to grow our contract management business, our financial guidance, our future cost saving efforts, our increased business from new equipment or operations and our ability to finance our operations are forward-looking statements.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “assumption” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.  

The factors included in “Risk Factors,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as amended or supplemented by the information,  if any, in Part II – Item 1A below, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements.  You should consider the inherent limitations on, and risks associated with, forward-looking statements and not unduly rely on the accuracy of predictions contained in such forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date when they are made.  Except as required under the federal securities laws or by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances, changes in expectations, or the occurrence of unanticipated events after the date of those statements.  Moreover, in the future, the Company, through senior management, may make forward-looking statements that involve the risk factors and other matters described in this Form 10-Q as well as other risk factors subsequently identified, including, among others, those identified in the Company’s filings with the SEC on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K.

We do not undertake any responsibility to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to take into account events or circumstances that occur after the date of this quarterly report. Additionally, we do not undertake any responsibility to update you on the occurrence of any unanticipated events which may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report.

Overview

With 232 centers, which we operate directly or indirectly through joint ventures as of March 31, 2012, located in California, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Florida, and New York, we are the leading national provider of freestanding, fixed-site outpatient diagnostic imaging services in the United States based on number of locations and aggregate annual imaging revenue.Our centers provide physicians with imaging capabilities to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and disorders and may reduce unnecessary invasive procedures, often minimizing the cost and amount of care for patients. Our services include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), nuclear medicine, mammography, ultrasound, diagnostic radiology (X-ray), fluoroscopy and other related procedures. The vast majority of our centers offer multi-modality imaging services, a key point of differentiation from our competitors. Our multi-modality strategy diversifies revenue streams, reduces exposure to reimbursement changes and provides patients and referring physicians one location to serve the needs of multiple procedures.

We seek to develop leading positions in regional markets in order to leverage operational efficiencies. Our scale and density within selected geographies provides close, long-term relationships with key payors, radiology groups and referring physicians. Each of our facility managers is responsible for managing relationships with local physicians and payors, meeting our standards of patient service and maintaining profitability. We provide corporate training programs, standardized policies and procedures and sharing of best practices among the physicians in our regional networks.

25

We derive substantially all of our revenue, directly or indirectly, from fees charged for the diagnostic imaging services performed at our facilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we performed 1,059,636 diagnostic imaging procedures and generated total net service fee revenue of $162.0 million.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Radnet Management, Inc. (or “Radnet Management”) and Beverly Radiology Medical Group III, a professional partnership (“BRMG”).  The consolidated financial statements also include Radnet Management I, Inc., Radnet Management II, Inc.,  Radiologix, Inc., Radnet Management Imaging Services, Inc., Delaware Imaging Partners, Inc., New Jersey Imaging Partners, Inc. and Diagnostic Imaging Services, Inc. (“DIS”), all wholly owned subsidiaries of Radnet Management.  All of these affiliated entities are referred to collectively as “RadNet”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company” in this report.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 810-10-15-14 stipulates that generally any entity with a) insufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by any parties, or b) equity holders that, as a group, lack the characteristics specified in the Codification which evidence a controlling financial interest, is considered a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”).  We consolidate all voting interest entities in which we own a majority voting interest and all VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary. We determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE through a qualitative analysis that identifies which variable interest holder has the controlling financial interest in the VIE. The variable interest holder who has both of the following has the controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In performing our analysis, we consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: the design and activities of the VIE, the terms of the contracts the VIE has entered into, the nature of the VIE’s variable interests issued and how they were negotiated with or marketed to potential investors, and which parties participated significantly in the design or redesign of the entity.

Howard G. Berger, M.D. is our President and Chief Executive Officer, a member of our Board of Directors and is deemed to be the beneficial owner, directly and indirectly, of approximately 14.1% of our outstanding common stock. Dr. Berger also owns, indirectly, 99% of the equity interests in BRMG. BRMG provides all of the professional medical services at the majority of our facilities located in California under a management agreement with us, and employs physicians or contracts with various other independent physicians and physician groups to provide the professional medical services at most of our other California facilities. We generally obtain professional medical services from BRMG in California, rather than provide such services directly or through subsidiaries, in order to comply with California’s prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine. However, as a result of our close relationship with Dr. Berger and BRMG, we believe that we are able to better ensure that medical service is provided at our California facilities in a manner consistent with our needs and expectations and those of our referring physicians, patients and payers than if we obtained these services from unaffiliated physician groups. BRMG is a partnership of ProNet Imaging Medical Group, Inc., Breastlink Medical Group, Inc. and Beverly Radiology Medical Group, Inc., each of which are 99% or 100% owned by Dr. Berger.  RadNet provides non-medical, technical and administrative services to BRMG for which it receives a management fee, per the management agreement. Through the management agreement and our relationship with Dr. Berger, we have exclusive authority over all non-medical decision making related to the ongoing business operations of BRMG. Through our management agreement with BRMG we determine the annual budget of BRMG and make all physician employment decisions.  BRMG has insignificant operating assets and liabilities, and de minimis equity.  Through the management agreement with us, all of BRMG’s cash flows are transferred to us.  We have determined that BRMG is a variable interest entity, and that we are the primary beneficiary, and consequently, we consolidate the revenue and expenses of BRMG. BRMG recognized $12.7 million and $12.7 million of revenue, net of management service fees to RadNet, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $12.7 million and $12.7 million of operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  RadNet recognized $50.4 million and $47.8 million of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for management services provided to BRMG relating primarily to the technical portion of total billed revenue. The cash flows of BRMG are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The creditors of BRMG do not have recourse to our general credit and there are no other arrangements that could expose us to losses.  However, BRMG is managed to recognize no net income or net loss and, therefore, RadNet may be required to provide financial support to cover any operating expenses in excess of operating revenues.

26

Aside from centers in California where we contract with BRMG for the provision of professional medical services and consolidate 100% of the patient service revenue, at the remaining centers in California and at all of the centers which are located outside of California, we have entered into long-term contracts with independent radiology groups in the area to provide physician services at those facilities.  These third party radiology practices provide professional services, including supervision and interpretation of diagnostic imaging procedures, in our diagnostic imaging centers.  The radiology practices maintain full control over the provision of professional services. The contracted radiology practices generally have outstanding physician and practice credentials and reputations; strong competitive market positions; a broad sub-specialty mix of physicians; a history of growth and potential for continued growth.  In these facilities we enter into long-term agreements with radiology practice groups (typically 40 years). Under these arrangements, we provide management services and receive a fee which includes 100% of the technical reimbursements associated with imaging procedures for the use of our diagnostic imaging equipment and the provision of technical services.  Our management service fees also include a portion of the practice group’s professional revenue, including revenue derived outside of our diagnostic imaging centers as well as fees for administrative services. The radiology practice groups retain the professional reimbursements associated with imaging procedures after deducting management service fees paid to us.  We have no financial controlling interest in the independent (non-BRMG) radiology practices; accordingly, we do not consolidate the financial statements of those practices in our consolidated financial statements and record only our management service fee revenue.

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements that were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.  Management makes estimates and assumptions when preparing financial statements.  These estimates and assumptions affect various matters, including:

· our reported amounts of assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets at the dates of the financial statements;

· our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements; and

· our reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in our consolidated statements of operations during the reporting periods.

These estimates involve judgments with respect to numerous factors that are difficult to predict and are beyond management’s control.  As a result, actual amounts could differ materially from these estimates.

The Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, defines critical accounting estimates as those that are both most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.  In Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, we discuss our significant accounting policies, including those that do not require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates.  The most significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates are described below.

During the period covered in this report, there were no material changes to the critical accounting estimates we use, and have described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Revenues

Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts, consists of net patient fees received from various payers and patients themselves based mainly upon established contractual billing rates, less allowances for contractual adjustments.  As it relates to BRMG centers, this service fee revenue includes payments for both the professional medical interpretation revenue recognized by BRMG as well as the payment for all other aspects related to our providing the imaging services, for which we earn management fees from BRMG.  As it relates to non-BRMG centers, this service fee revenue  is earned through providing the administration of the non-medical functions relating to the professional medical practice at our non-BRMG centers, including among other functions, provision of clerical and administrative personnel, bookkeeping and accounting services, billing and collection, provision of medical and office supplies, secretarial, reception and transcription services, maintenance of medical records, and advertising, marketing and promotional activities.

Service fee revenues are recorded during the period the patient services are provided based upon the estimated amounts due from the patients and third-party payers. Third-party payers include federal and state agencies (under the Medicare and Medicaid programs), managed care health plans, commercial insurance companies and employers. Estimates of contractual allowances under managed care health plans are based upon the payment terms specified in the related contractual agreements. Contractual payment terms in managed care agreements are generally based upon predetermined rates per discounted fee-for-service rates. We also record a provision for doubtful accounts (based primarily on historical collection experience) related to patients and copayment and deductible amounts for patients who have health care coverage under one of our third-party payers.

27

Our service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts less the provision for bad debt for the three months ended March 31, are summarized in the following table (in thousands):

	2012			2011
Commercial Insurance	$	93,518		$	79,390
Managed Care Capitated Payors		24,770			21,612
Medicare		33,026			28,384
Medicaid		5,729			4,899
Other		11,458			9,798
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts		168,500			144,083
Provision for bad debts		(6,484	)		(5,031	)
Net service fee revenue	$	162,016		$	139,052

The break-out of our service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts, is calculated based upon global payments received from consolidated imaging centers from dates of service from each respective period illustrated.

 Provision for Bad Debts

Although outcomes vary, our policy is to attempt to collect amounts due from patients, including co-payments and

deductibles due from patients with insurance, at the time of service. We provide for an allowance against accounts receivable that could become uncollectible by establishing an allowance to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. We estimate this allowance based on the aging of our accounts receivable by each type of payer over an 18-month look-back period, and other relevant factors. A significant portion of our provision for bad debt relates to co-payments and deductibles owed to us by patients with insurance. There are various factors that can impact collection trends, such as changes in the economy, which in turn have an impact on the increased burden of co-payments and deductibles to be made by patients with insurance. These factors continuously change and can have an impact on collection trends and our estimation process.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the three months ended March 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to conform with the three months ended March 31, 2012 presentation. Additionally, we have adjusted prior year’s presentation as a result of the adoption of ASU 2011-07, Health Care Entities (Topic 954). In connection with this adjustment, we identified certain mechanical errors in our historical calculation of the provision for bad debts, resulting in the gross up of the provision for bad debts and revenues by $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The error has been corrected in these financial statements and upon adoption of the new guidance, resulted in no impact to net service fee revenue.

Accounts Receivable

Substantially all of our accounts receivable are due under fee-for-service contracts from third party payors, such as insurance companies and government-sponsored healthcare programs, or directly from patients.  Services are generally provided pursuant to one-year contracts with healthcare providers.  Receivables generally are collected within industry norms for third-party payors.  We continuously monitor collections from our payors and maintain an allowance for bad debts based upon specific payor collection issues that we have identified and our historical experience.

Depreciation and Amortization of Long-Lived Assets

We depreciate our long-lived assets over their estimated economic useful lives with the exception of leasehold improvements where we use the shorter of the assets useful lives or the lease term of the facility for which these assets are associated.

28

Deferred Tax Assets

We evaluate the realizability of the net deferred tax assets and assess the valuation allowance periodically.  If future taxable income or other factors are not consistent with our expectations, an adjustment to our allowance for net deferred tax assets may be required.  For net deferred tax assets we consider estimates of future taxable income, including tax planning strategies in determining whether our net deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized.

Valuation of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill at March 31, 2012 totaled $159.6 million. Goodwill is recorded as a result of business combinations. Management evaluates goodwill, at a minimum, on an annual basis and whenever events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. Impairment of goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair value of a reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income or discounted cash flows approach and the market approach, which uses comparable market data. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.  We tested goodwill for impairment on October 1, 2011.  Based on our test, we noted no impairment related to goodwill as of October 1, 2011. However, if estimates or the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill.  No indications of impairment were noted at March 31, 2012.

We evaluate our long-lived assets (property and equipment) and definite-lived intangibles for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. The accounting standards require that if the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows from a long-lived asset or definite-lived intangible is less than the carrying value of that asset, an asset impairment charge must be recognized. The amount of the impairment charge is calculated as the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value, which generally represents the discounted future cash flows from that asset or in the case of assets we expect to sell, at fair value less costs to sell. No indicators of impairment were identified with respect to our long-lived assets as of March 31, 2012.

Recent Accounting Standards

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) (“ASU 2011-04”), which contains amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosures in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 explains how to measure fair value for financial reporting. The guidance does not require fair value measurements in addition to those already required or permitted by other Topics. This ASU was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which updates existing guidance on comprehensive income. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income, which was our previous presentation. It requires companies to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two statement approach which we have adopted, the first statement presents total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that presents total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income and the total of comprehensive income. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any effect on our financial condition or results of operations, though it did change our financial statement presentation.

29

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-07, “Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation and Disclosure of Patient Service Revenue, Provision for Bad Debts, and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for Certain Health Care Entities,” which requires health care entities to present the provision for doubtful accounts relating to patient service revenue as a deduction from patient service revenue in the statement of operations rather than as an operating expense. Additional disclosures relating to sources of patient revenue and the allowance for doubtful accounts related to patient accounts receivable are also required. Such additional disclosures are included in Note 1. The adoption of this ASU had no impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, although it did change our financial statement presentation.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment”, simplifying how a company is required to test goodwill for impairment. Companies will now have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the company determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.

Recent Developments and Facility Acquisitions

On February 29, 2012, we completed the acquisition of a multi modality imaging center from TODIC, L.P. located in Camarillo, California for cash consideration of $350,000 and the assumption of a $121,000 capital lease liability. The facility provides MRI, CT, mammography, ultrasound and X-ray services. We have made a fair value determination of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and approximately $425,000 of fixed assets and $86,000 of goodwill was recorded with respect to this transaction as well as the assumption of approximately $40,000 of accrued liabilities.

On February 29, 2012, we completed the acquisition of a multi modality imaging center from Progressive MRI, LLC located in Frederick, Maryland for cash consideration of $230,000. The facility provides MRI, CT, mammography, ultrasound and X-ray services. We have made a fair value determination of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and approximately $230,000 of fixed assets was recorded with respect to this transaction

Industry Updates

For services for which we bill Medicare directly, we are paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which is updated on an annual basis. Under the Medicare statutory formula, payments under the Physician Fee Schedule would have decreased for the past several years if Congress failed to intervene.

For 2010, CMS projected a rate reduction of 21.2% in the absence of Congressional intervention.  However, over the course of the first six months of 2010, various temporary solutions were enacted by Congress which resulted in delaying any such change to the physician fee schedule.  Ultimately, a 2.2% increase in the conversion factor was passed by Congress effective June 1, 2010, further delaying the pending 21.2% conversion factor reduction to November 30, 2010.  On November 2, 2010, CMS released the calendar year 2011 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.  Again, the rule would have significantly reduced physician fee schedule payments in 2011 had Congress not acted by passing the Physician Payment and Therapy Relief Act of 2010 and the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010, which together continued the 2.2% update from June 2010 through December 31, 2011.  Similarly, the calendar year 2012 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule provided for a 27.4% decrease to the physician fee schedule which was averted by Congress passing the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012.  While Congress has historically provided temporary relief from the formula-driven reductions in the conversion factor, it cannot be guaranteed that Congress will act to provide relief in the future. The failure of Congress to act could adversely impact our revenues and results of operation.

30

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage that certain items in the statements of operations bears to service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts.

RADNET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2012		2011
NET SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts		100.0%		100.0%
Provision for bad debts		-3.8%		-3.5%
Net service fee revenue		96.2%		96.5%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of operations		80.4%		80.4%
Depreciation and amortization		8.8%		9.7%
Loss on sale and disposal of equipment		0.0%		0.2%
Severance costs		0.3%		0.1%
Total operating expenses		89.5%		90.3%
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		6.7%		6.2%
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		8.1%		9.0%
Other income		-0.7%		-1.3%
Total other expenses		7.4%		7.7%
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURES		-0.7%		-1.5%
Provision for income taxes		-0.1%		-0.1%
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		0.7%		1.0%
NET LOSS		-0.1%		-0.6%
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.0%		0.0%
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS		-0.1%		-0.6%

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Service Fee Revenue

Service fee revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $168.5 million compared to $144.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an increase of $24.4 million, or 17.0%.

Service fee revenue, including only those centers which were in operation throughout the first quarters of both 2012 and 2011, increased $1.6 million, or 1.1%.  This 1.1% increase is primarily the result of a similar percentage increase in procedure volumes.  This comparison excludes revenue contributions from centers that were acquired or divested subsequent to January 1, 2011.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, service fee revenue from centers that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2011 and excluded from the above comparison was $23.1 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, service fee revenue from centers that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2011 and excluded from the above comparison was $284,000.

Provision for Bad Debts

Provision for bad debts increased $1.5 million, or 28.9%, to $6.5 million, or 3.8% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $5.0 million, or 3.5% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2012.  This increase is in line with the increase in service fee revenues.

31

Operating Expenses

Cost of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased approximately $19.6 million, or 16.9%, from $115.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $135.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.  The following table sets forth our cost of operations and total operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
Salaries and professional reading fees, excluding stock-based compensation	$	74,184	$	64,658
Stock-based compensation		1,175		1,048
Building and equipment rental		14,908		12,660
Medical supplies		9,999		7,576
Other operating expenses *		35,134		29,886
Cost of operations		135,400		115,828
Depreciation and amortization		14,892		13,921
Loss on sale and disposal of equipment		24		259
Severance costs		449		145
Total operating expenses	$	150,765	$	130,153

*           Includes billing fees, office supplies, repairs and maintenance, insurance, business tax and license, outside services, utilities, marketing, travel and other expenses.

Salaries and professional reading fees, excluding stock-based compensation and severance

Salaries and professional reading fees increased $9.5 million, or 14.7%, to $74.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $64.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Salaries and professional reading fees, including only those centers which were in operation throughout the first quarters of both 2012 and 2011, increased $1.8 million, or 2.7%.   This 2.7% increase is in line with our increase in revenue at these centers. This comparison excludes expenses from centers that were acquired or divested subsequent to January 1, 2011.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, salaries and professional reading fees from centers that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2011 and excluded from the above comparison was approximately $8.0 million.  For the three months ended March 31, 2011, salaries and professional reading fees from centers that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2011 and excluded from the above comparison was approximately $242,000.

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation increased $127,000, or 12.1%, to approximately $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The increase is due in part to restricted stock awards issued during the first quarter of 2012 and the expensing of one third of their fair value in connection with the vesting of one third of the stock on the award date.

Building and equipment rental

Building and equipment rental expenses increased $2.2 million, or 17.8%, to $14.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $12.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Building and equipment rental expenses, including only those centers which were in operation throughout the first quarters of both 2012 and 2011, increased $180,000, or 1.4%. This 1.4% increase is primarily due to new equipment leases entered into subsequent to March 31, 2011 offset in part by equipment lease buy-outs occurring subsequent to March 31, 2011.  This comparison excludes expenses from centers that were acquired or divested subsequent to January 1, 2011.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, building and equipment rental expenses from centers that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2011 and excluded from the above comparison was approximately $2.1 million.  For the three months ended March 31, 2011, building and equipment rental expenses from centers that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2011 and excluded from the above comparison was $20,000.

32

Medical supplies

Medical supplies expense increased $2.4 million, or 32.0%, to $10.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Medical supplies expenses, including only those centers which were in operation throughout the first quarters of both 2012 and 2011, increased $547,000, or 7.2%.  This 7.2% increase is in line with the increase in our procedure volumes. This comparison excludes expenses from centers that were acquired or divested subsequent to January 1, 2011.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, medical supplies expense from centers that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2011 and excluded from the above comparison was $1.9 million.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased $971,000, or 7.0%, to $14.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period last year. The increase is primarily due to property and equipment additions for existing centers as well as newly acquired centers.

Interest expense

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased approximately $652,000, or 5.1%, to $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $12.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 included $771,000 of amortization of deferred loan costs as well as $276,000 of amortization of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss associated with fair value adjustments to our interest rate swaps accumulated prior to April 6, 2010, the date of our debt refinancing. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 included $748,000 of amortization of deferred loan costs as well as $306,000 of amortization of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss associated with fair value adjustments to our interest rate swaps accumulated prior to April 6, 2010, the date of our debt refinancing.  See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for more details on our debt refinancing.

Other income

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recorded approximately $1.2 million of other income primarily related to fair value adjustments on our interest rate swaps.  For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded approximately $1.9 million of other income including $1.4 million of fair value adjustments on our interest rate swaps as well as $500,000 of insurance proceeds related to equipment damaged in a fire at one of our imaging centers.

Income tax expense

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $245,000 and $147,000, respectively, for income tax expense primarily related to taxable income generated in the states of California, Maryland and Delaware.

Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recognized equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures of $1.3 million compared to $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  This decrease is primarily due to a change in estimated collection rates applied to revenue recognized subsequent to March 31, 2011.

Adjusted EBITDA

We use both GAAP and non-GAAP metrics to measure our financial results.  We believe that, in addition to GAAP metrics, these non-GAAP metrics assist us in measuring our cash generated from operations and ability to service our debt obligations.  We believe this information is useful to investors and other interested parties because we are highly leveraged and our non-GAAP metrics removes non-cash and certain other charges that occur in the affected period and provides a basis for measuring the Company's financial condition against other quarters.

33

One non-GAAP measure we believe assists us is Adjusted EBITDA.  We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, each from continuing operations and exclude losses or gains on the disposal of equipment, other income or loss, loss on debt extinguishments, bargain purchase gains and non-cash equity compensation.  Adjusted EBITDA includes equity earnings in unconsolidated operations and subtracts allocations of earnings to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries, and is adjusted for non-cash or extraordinary and one-time events taking place during the period.

Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to its nearest comparable GAAP financial measure, net income (loss) attributable to RadNet, Inc. common stockholders.   Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used as an analytical indicator by us and the healthcare industry to assess business performance, and is a measure of leverage capacity and ability to service debt.  Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a measure of financial performance under GAAP, and the items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as alternatives to net income, cash flows generated by operating, investing or financing activities or other financial statement data presented in the consolidated financial statements as an indicator of financial performance or liquidity. As Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement determined in accordance with GAAP and is therefore susceptible to varying methods of calculation, this metric, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

The following is a reconciliation of GAAP net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2012			2011
Net Loss Attributable to RadNet, Inc. Common Stockholders	$	(111	)	$	(876	)
Plus Provision for Income Taxes		245			147
Plus Other Expenses (Income)		(1,147	)		(1,871	)
Plus Interest Expense		13,567			12,915
Plus Severence Costs		449			145
Plus Loss on Sale and Disposal of Equipment		24			259
Plus Depreciation and Amortization		14,892			13,921
Plus Non Cash Employee Stock Based Compensation		1,175			1,048
Adjusted EBITDA	$	29,094		$	25,688

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had a working capital balance of $27.5 million and $30.0 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  We had a net loss attributable to RadNet, Inc.’s common stockholders of $111,000 and $876,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  We also had an equity deficit of $68.5 million and $69.8 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

We operate in a capital intensive, high fixed-cost industry that requires significant amounts of capital to fund operations.  In addition to operations, we require a significant amount of capital for the initial start-up and development expense of new diagnostic imaging facilities, the acquisition of additional facilities and new diagnostic imaging equipment.  Because our cash flows from operations have been insufficient to fund all of these capital requirements, we have depended on the availability of financing under credit arrangements with third parties.

Based on our current level of operations, we believe that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under our credit agreement will be adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.  Our future liquidity requirements will be for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and general corporate purposes.  Our ability to meet our working capital and debt service requirements, however, is subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.  If we are not able to meet such requirements, we may be required to seek additional financing.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing from other sources on the terms acceptable to us, if at all.

From time to time, we may pursue acquisitions, but the timing, size or success of any acquisition effort and the related potential capital commitments cannot be predicted.  We expect to fund any future acquisitions primarily with cash flow from operations and borrowings, including borrowing from amounts available under our current credit agreement or through new equity or debt issuances.

34

We and our subsidiaries or affiliates may from time to time, in our or their sole discretion, continue to purchase, repay, redeem or retire any of our outstanding debt or equity securities in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise.  However, we have no formal plan of doing so at this time.

Our business strategy with regard to operations focuses on the following:

· maximizing performance at our existing facilities;

· focusing on profitable contracting;

· expanding MRI, CT and PET applications;

· optimizing operating efficiencies; and

· expanding our networks.

On April 6, 2010, we completed a series of transactions which we refer to as our "debt refinancing plan" for an aggregate of $585.0 million.  As part of the debt refinancing plan, our wholly owned subsidiary Radnet Management, Inc. issued and sold $200.0 million in 10 3/8% senior notes due 2018 (the "senior notes"). All payments of the senior notes, including principal and interest, are guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior unsecured basis by RadNet, Inc. and all of Radnet Management’s current and future domestic wholly owned restricted subsidiaries. The senior notes were issued under an indenture, dated April 6, 2010, by and among Radnet Management, as issuer, RadNet, Inc., as parent guarantor, the subsidiary guarantors thereof and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, in a private placement that was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  We subsequently exchanged the senior notes initially issued on April 6, 2010 in a private placement for publicly registered exchange notes with nearly identical terms.  The exchange offer was completed on February 14, 2011.

In addition to the issuance of senior notes, Radnet Management entered into a new Credit and Guaranty Agreement with a syndicate of lenders (the "New Credit Agreement"), whereby Radnet Management obtained $385.0 million in senior secured first-lien bank financing, consisting of (i) a $285.0 million, six-year term loan facility and (ii) a $100.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a swing line subfacility and a letter of credit subfacility (collectively, the “New Credit Facilities”). Radnet Management’s obligations under the New Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by RadNet, Inc., all of Radnet Management’s current and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries as well as certain affiliates, including Beverly Radiology Medical Group III and its equity holders (Beverly Radiology Medical Group, Inc., BreastLink Medical Group, Inc. and ProNet Imaging Medical Group, Inc.). These New Credit Facilities created by the New Credit Agreement are secured by a perfected first-priority security interest in all of Radnet Management’s and the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets, including, but not limited to, pledges of equity interests of Radnet Management and all of our current and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries.

In connection with the issuance of the outstanding senior notes and entering into the New Credit Agreement, Radnet Management used the net proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes and the New Credit Facilities created by the New Credit Agreement to repay in full its existing first lien term loan for $242.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding, which would have matured on November 15, 2012, and its second lien term loan for $170.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding, which would have matured on November 15, 2013.

On November 8, 2011, in conjunction with our acquisition of the U.S. imaging operations of CML HealthCare Inc. (RH), we increased the size of our revolving credit facility by $21.25 million, to $121.25 million of total borrowing capacity (the “Incremental Commitments”).  The increased facility size will provide additional borrowing availability to fund further acquisitions and general working capital needs.

At March 31, 2012, we had $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes outstanding, $279.3 million of senior secured term loan debt outstanding and $60.7 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility.  We had $60.55 million of available credit under our revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing conditions under that facility as further described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants under the New Credit Facilities and the senior notes.

35

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash provided by operating activities was $15.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $15.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Cash used in investing activities was $12.8 million and $23.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we purchased property and equipment for approximately $14.0 million and acquired the assets and businesses of additional imaging facilities for approximately $580,000.  We also purchased additional equity interests in non-consolidated joint ventures for approximately $920,000.  Offsetting our cash used in investing activities was $2.3 million in proceeds from the sale of an acquired imaging center that was classified on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011as an asset held for sale.

Cash used in financing activities was $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was primarily related to payments we made toward our term loans, capital leases and line of credit balances, as well as $1.5 million of cash payments, net of cash receipts, related to our modified cash flow hedges.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk.   We sell our services exclusively in the United States and receive payment for our services exclusively in United States dollars.  As a result, our financial results are unlikely to be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency, exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets.

After the completion of the acquisition of Image Medical Corporation, the parent of eRAD, Inc. on October 1, 2010, we maintain research and development facilities in Prince Edward Island, Canada and Budapest, Hungary for which expenses are paid in the local currency. Accordingly, we do have currency risk resulting from fluctuations between such local currency and the United States Dollar.  At the present time, we do not have any foreign exchange currency contracts to mitigate this risk.  Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could impact future operating results.  A hypothetical 1% increase in the rate of exchange of foreign currencies against the dollar for 2012 would result in an increase of approximately $10,000 in our operating expenses for the current year.

Interest Rate Sensitivity.   A large portion of our interest expense is not sensitive to changes in the general level of interest in the United States because much of our indebtedness has interest rates that were fixed when we entered into the note payable or capital lease obligation. Our credit facility however, which is classified as a long-term liability on our financial statements, is interest expense sensitive to changes in the general level of interest in the United States because it is priced at a 3.75% spread to the greater of 2%   (“LIBOR Floor”) or 3 month LIBOR.  At March 31, 2012, we had $305.3 million outstanding under our credit facilities that are tied to LIBOR.  Because the LIBOR Floor exceeds the current spot rate of 3 month LIBOR (currently at about 47 basis points), the spot rate of 3 month LIBOR would have to increase by more than 153 basis points before we would recognize any increase in our interest expense.  The LIBOR rate would have to increase by 253 basis points for us to realize a 1% increase in our borrowing rate under our current credit facility and for us to experience an annual increase of $3.1 million in our interest expense. We have an additional $34.7 million under our credit facilities that is tied to the prime rate. A hypothetical 1% increase in the prime rate for 2012 could result in an increase of approximately $350,000 in our interest expense for the current year.

36

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information is: (1) gathered and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, on a timely basis; and (2) recorded, processed, summarized, reported and filed with the SEC as required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for their intended purpose described above.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all errors or all instances of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and any design may not succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitation of a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

37

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  Legal Proceedings

We are engaged from time to time in the defense of lawsuits arising out of the ordinary course and conduct of our business. We believe that the outcome of our current litigation will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  However, we could be subsequently named as a defendant in other lawsuits that could adversely affect us.

ITEM 1A.  Risk Factors

Information about risk factors for the three months ended March 31, 2012, does not differ materially from that set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.  The risks described in our annual report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company and include additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial as of the date of this report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

ITEM 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.  Other Information

None

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	RADNET, INC. (Registrant)
Date:  May 10, 2012	By:	/s/ Howard G. Berger, M.D.
		Howard G. Berger, M.D.
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date:  May 10, 2012	By:	/s/ Mark D. Stolper
		Mark D. Stolper
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

39

Exhibit Number	Description
10.1*	Form of Restricted Stock Award for the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
31.1	Certification of Howard G. Berger, M.D. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Mark D. Stolper pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Howard G. Berger, M.D.
32.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Mark D. Stolper.
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL**	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

______________________

*	Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
**	Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Incentive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

40

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

RADNET, INC.

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT

The Company hereby awards a Stock Award (the “Restricted Stock”) to the Awardee named below.  The terms and conditions of the Stock Award are set forth in this cover sheet and the attached Stock Award Agreement and in the Plan.  This cover sheet is incorporated into and a part of the attached Stock Award Agreement (together, the “Agreement”).

Date of Award:

Name of Awardee:

Number of Shares of Restricted Stock Awarded:

Amount Paid by Awardee for the Shares of Restricted Stock Awarded:	$
Fair Market Value of a Share on Date of Award:	$

Vesting Calculation Date:  __________________,

Vesting Schedule:

As long as you continuously are a Service Provider, you will become incrementally vested as to [   %] of the total number of Shares of Restricted Stock awarded (rounded down to the nearest whole number), as shown above on the cover sheet, on each of the first [     ] anniversaries of the Vesting Calculation Date.  In the event that you cease to be a Service Provider prior to the [     ] anniversary of the Vesting Calculation Date, you will forfeit to the Company without consideration (except for any amount paid by you to the Company for the unvested Shares as shown above) all of the unvested Shares subject to this Award.  However, the total number of then unvested Shares subject to this Award shall become fully vested if there is a Change in Control and your status as a Service Provider is either terminated without cause (as defined below) by the Company or terminated by you for Good Reason (as defined below) in anticipation of or written 24 months after the Change in Control

By signing this cover sheet, you agree to all terms and conditions described in the attached Stock Award Agreement and in the Plan and Plan prospectus.  You specifically acknowledge that you have carefully read the section entitled "Code Section 83(b) Election" and the attachment entitled "Section 83(b) Elections" and you further acknowledge that you are solely responsible for filing any Code Section 83(b) election, and that such election must be filed within thirty (30) days after the Date of Award in order to be effective. You are also acknowledging receipt of this Agreement and copies of the Plan and its prospectus.

Company:	Awardee:
By: ________________________	________________________
Its: ________________________

Attachments

1

RADNET, INC.

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT

The Plan and Other Agreements	The text of the Plan is incorporated in this Agreement by this reference.  You and the Company agree to execute such further instruments and to take such further action as may reasonably be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement.  Unless otherwise defined in this Agreement, certain capitalized terms used in this Agreement are defined in the Plan. This Agreement, the attached Exhibits and the Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding this Award of Restricted Stock.  Any prior agreements, commitments or negotiations are superseded.
Award of Restricted Stock	The Company awards you the number of shares of Restricted Stock shown on the cover sheet of this Agreement.  The Award is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan.  This Award is not intended to constitute a nonqualified deferred compensation plan within the meaning of section 409A of the Code and will be interpreted accordingly.
Vesting	This Award will vest according to the Vesting Schedule on the attached cover sheet and also the below paragraphs of this section. The term "Cause" shall mean (1) the Awardee's theft, dishonesty, or falsification of any documents or records of the Company or any affiliate; (2) the Awardee's improper use or disclosure of confidential or proprietary information of the Company or any affiliate; (3) any action by the Awardee which has a detrimental effect on the reputation or business of the Company or any affiliate; (4) the Awardee's failure or inability to perform any reasonable assigned duties after written notice from the Company or an affiliate, and a reasonable opportunity to cure, such failure or inability; (5) any material breach by the Awardee of any employment or service agreement between the Awardee and the Company or an affiliate, which breach is not cured pursuant to the terms of such agreement; (6) the Awardee's conviction (including any plea of guilty or nolo contendere) of any criminal act which impairs the Awardee's ability to perform his or her duties with the Company or an affiliate; or (7) violation of a material Company policy. The term "Good Reason" shall mean, as determined by the Administrator, (A) a material adverse change in the Awardee's title, stature, authority, or responsibilities with the Company (or the affiliate employing him or her); (B) a material reduction in the Awardee's base salary or annual bonus opportunity; or (C) receipt of notice that the Awardee's principal workplace will be relocated by more than 50 miles.  The Awardee must provide written notice to the Company within 60 days of the initial existence of a Good Reason event or else the Awardee will have waived any ability to resign his/her service for Good Reason with respect to such event. Upon the death or permanent disability (as determined by a physician independent of Awardee and Company) of Awardee.

2

Escrow	The certificate(s) for the Restricted Stock shall be deposited in escrow with the Secretary of the Company (or his/her designee) to be held in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph.  Each deposited certificate shall be accompanied by a duly executed Assignment Separate from Certificate in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.  The deposited certificates shall remain in escrow until such time as the certificates are to be released or otherwise surrendered for cancellation as discussed below.  Upon delivery of the certificates to the Company, you shall be issued an instrument of deposit acknowledging the number of Shares of Restricted Stock delivered in escrow to the Secretary of the Company.
	All regular cash or stock dividends, if any, on the Restricted Stock shall be held in escrow and shall be subject to the same vesting conditions provided in this Agreement. The Restricted Stock held in escrow hereunder shall be subject to the following terms and conditions relating to their release from escrow or their surrender to the Company, provided, however, that the minimum number of Shares released to you in any individual release of Share certificates must be at least twenty-five (25) Shares (unless the release represents your final release of Share certificates from escrow): ·When your interest in the Restricted Stock vests, the certificates for such vested Restricted Stock (and related dividends) shall be released from escrow and delivered to you, at your request.  Upon your Termination of Service for any reason prior to vesting and in which no vesting is provided upon such termination, any unvested Restricted Stock (and dividends) subject to this Agreement shall be immediately surrendered to the Company.
No Assignment	The Shares subject to this Award shall not be sold, anticipated, assigned, attached, garnished, optioned, transferred or made subject to any creditor’s process, whether voluntarily, involuntarily or by operation of law.  However, this shall not preclude a transfer of vested Shares by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.  In addition, pursuant to Company procedures, you may designate a beneficiary who will receive any outstanding vested Shares in the event of your death.  Regardless of any marital property settlement agreement, the Company is not obligated to recognize your spouse’s interest in your Award in any way.
Code Section 83(b) Election	You represent and warrant that you understand the Federal, state and local income tax consequences of the granting of this Restricted Stock.  Under Section 83 of the Code, the Fair Market Value of the Restricted Stock on the date any forfeiture restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock lapse will be reportable as ordinary income at that time.  For this purpose, “forfeiture restrictions” include surrender to the Company of unvested Restricted Stock as described above.  You may voluntarily elect to be taxed at the time the Restricted Stock is acquired to the extent that the Fair Market Value of the Restricted Stock exceeds the amount of consideration paid by you (if any) for such Restricted Stock at that time rather than when such Restricted Stock ceases to be subject to such forfeiture restrictions, by filing an election under Section 83(b) of the Code with the Internal Revenue Service within thirty (30) days after the Date of Award.  A form for making this election is attached as Exhibit B hereto.  Failure to make this filing within the thirty (30) day period will result in the recognition of ordinary income by you as the forfeiture restrictions lapse.  YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IT IS YOUR SOLE RESPONSIBILITY, AND NOT THE COMPANY’S, TO FILE A TIMELY ELECTION UNDER CODE SECTION 83(b), EVEN IF YOU REQUEST THE COMPANY OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE THIS FILING ON YOUR BEHALF.  MOREOVER, YOU ARE RELYING SOLELY ON YOUR OWN ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE DECISION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT TO FILE A CODE SECTION 83(b) ELECTION.
Leaves of Absence	For purposes of this Agreement, while you are a common-law employee, your status as a Service Provider does not terminate when you go on a bona fide leave of absence that was approved by the Company (or its parent, subsidiary or affiliate) in writing, if the terms of the leave provide for continued service crediting, or when continued service crediting is required by applicable law.  Your status as a Service Provider terminates in any event when the approved leave ends, unless you immediately return to active work. The Company determines which leaves count for this purpose (along with determining the effect of a leave of absence on vesting of the Award), and when your status as a Service Provider terminates for all purposes under the Plan.
Voting and Other Rights	Subject to the terms of this Agreement, you shall have all the rights and privileges of a stockholder of the Company while the Restricted Stock is held in escrow, including the right to vote and to receive dividends (if any).
Adjustments	In the event of a stock split, a stock dividend or a similar change in the Company stock, the number of outstanding Shares covered by this Award may be adjusted (and rounded down to the nearest whole number) pursuant to the Plan.  This Award shall be subject to the terms of the agreement of merger, liquidation or reorganization in the event the Company is subject to such corporate activity.

3

Taxes and Withholding	You will be solely responsible for payment of any and all applicable taxes associated with this Award. The delivery to you of any Shares will not be permitted unless and until you have satisfied any withholding or other taxes that may be due.  At the discretion of the Administrator, any such tax withholding obligations may be settled by the Company withholding and retaining a portion of the Shares from the Shares that would otherwise be deliverable to you as of the vesting date and/or by Shares which have already been owned by you for more than six (6) months and which are surrendered to the Company.  Such withheld or surrendered Shares will be applied to pay the withholding obligation by using the aggregate fair market value of the withheld or surrendered Shares as of the date of vesting.  If Shares are withheld, then you will be delivered the net amount of vested Shares after the Share withholding has been effected and you will not receive the withheld Shares.
Restrictions on Issuance and Resale	The Company will not issue any Shares if the issuance of such Shares at that time would violate any law or regulation. By signing this Agreement, you agree not to sell, transfer, dispose of, pledge, hypothecate, make any short sale of, or otherwise effect a similar transaction of any Shares acquired under this Award (each a “Sale Prohibition”) at a time when applicable laws, regulations or Company or underwriter trading policies prohibit the exercise or disposition of Shares.  The Company shall have the right to designate one or more periods of time, each of which generally will not exceed one hundred eighty (180) days in length (provided however, that such period may be extended in connection with the Company’s release (or announcement of release) of earnings results or other material news or events), and to impose a Sale Prohibition, if the Company determines (in its sole discretion) that such limitation(s) is needed in connection with a public offering of Shares or to comply with an underwriter’s request or trading policy, or could in any way facilitate a lessening of any restriction on transfer pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 or any state securities laws with respect to any issuance of securities by the Company, facilitate the registration or qualification of any securities by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or any state securities laws, or facilitate the perfection of any exemption from the registration or qualification requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 or any applicable state securities laws for the issuance or transfer of any securities.  The Company may issue stop/transfer instructions and/or appropriately legend any stock certificates issued pursuant to this Award in order to ensure compliance with the foregoing. If the sale of Shares acquired under this Award is not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, but an exemption is available which requires an investment representation or other representation and warranty, you shall represent and agree that the Shares being acquired are being acquired for investment, and not with a view to the sale or distribution thereof, and shall make and warranties as are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Company and its counsel.
Legends	All certificates representing the Shares issued under this Award may, where applicable, have endorsed thereon the following legends and any other legends the Company such other representations determines appropriate: “THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER AND OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SUCH SHARES SET FORTH IN AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND THE REGISTERED HOLDER, OR HIS OR HER PREDECESSOR IN INTEREST.  A COPY OF SUCH AGREEMENT IS ON FILE AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF THE COMPANY AND WILL BE FURNISHED UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY BY THE HOLDER OF RECORD OF THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE.” “THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION THEREOF UNDER SUCH ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY AND ITS COUNSEL, THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.”
No Retention Rights	Your Award or this Agreement does not give you the right to be retained by the Company (or any parent or any subsidiaries or affiliates) in any capacity.  The Company (or any parent and any subsidiaries or affiliates) reserves the right to terminate your status as a Service Provider at any time and for any reason. This Award and the Shares subject to the Award are not intended to constitute or replace any pension rights or compensation and are not to be considered compensation of a continuing or recurring nature, or part of your normal or expected compensation, and in no way represent any portion of your salary, compensation or other remuneration for any purpose, including but not limited to, calculating any severance, resignation, termination, redundancy, dismissal, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments.

4

Notice	Any notice to be given or delivered to the Company relating to this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the Company at its principal corporate offices.  Any notice to be given or delivered to you relating to this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to you at such address of which you advise the Company in writing.  All notices shall be deemed effective upon personal delivery or upon deposit in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the party to be notified.
Applicable Law	This Agreement will be interpreted and enforced under the laws of the State of California without reference to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.
Voluntary Awardee	You acknowledge that you are voluntarily participating in the Plan.
No Rights to Future Awards	Your rights, if any, in respect of or in connection with this Award or any other Awards are derived solely from the discretionary decision of the Company to permit you to participate in the Plan and to benefit from a discretionary future Award.  By accepting this Award, you expressly acknowledge that there is no obligation on the part of the Company to continue the Plan and/or grant any additional Awards to you or benefits in lieu of other Awards even if Awards have been granted repeatedly in the past.  All decisions with respect to future Awards, if any, will be at the sole discretion of the Administrator.
Future Value	The future value of the underlying Shares is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty.  If the underlying Shares do not increase in value (or decrease in value) after the Date of Award, the Award could have little or no value.
No Advice Regarding Award	The Company has not provided any tax, legal or financial advice, nor has the Company made any recommendations regarding your participation in the Plan, or your acquisition or sale of the underlying Shares.  You are hereby advised to consult with your own personal tax, legal and financial advisors regarding your participation in the Plan before taking any action related to the Plan or this Award.
No Right to Damages	You will have no right to bring a claim or to receive damages if any portion of the Award is cancelled or expires.  The loss of existing or potential profit in the Award will not constitute an element of damages in the event of your Termination of Service for any reason, even if the termination is in violation of an obligation of the Company or a parent or a subsidiary or an affiliate to you.
Data Privacy	You hereby explicitly and unambiguously consent to the collection, use and transfer, in electronic or other form, of your personal data as described in this document by the Company for the exclusive purpose of implementing, administering and managing your participation in the Plan.  You understand that the Company holds certain personal information about you, including, but not limited to, name, home address and telephone number, date of birth, social security or insurance number or other identification number, salary, nationality, job title, any shares of stock or directorships held in the Company, details of all Awards or any other entitlement to Shares awarded, cancelled, purchased, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding in your favor for the purpose of implementing, managing and administering the Plan (“Data”).  You understand that the Data may be transferred to any third parties assisting in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan, that these recipients may be located in your country or elsewhere and that the recipient country may have different data privacy laws and protections than your country.  You authorize the recipients to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing your participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer of such Data, as may be required to a broker or other third party with whom you may elect to deposit any Shares acquired under the Plan.

By signing the cover sheet of this Agreement, you agree to all of the terms and conditions described above and in the Plan and its prospectus.  Any inconsistency between this Agreement and the Plan shall be resolved by reference to the Plan.

5

EXHIBIT A

ASSIGNMENT SEPARATE FROM CERTIFICATE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED and pursuant to that certain Stock Award Agreement dated as of ________________, 20_____ the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto _________shares of the Common Stock of Radnet, Inc., a Delawarecorporation, standing in the undersigned’s name on the books of said corporation represented by certificate No. ____________, herewith, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ______________________________ attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the said corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated:                      __________________, 20____

_______________________________________

6

EXHIBIT B

ELECTION UNDER SECTION 83(b) OF

THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

The undersigned hereby makes an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the property described below and supplies the following information in accordance with the regulations promulgated thereunder:

1.           The name, address and social security number of the undersigned:

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

Social Security No. :

2. Description of property with respect to which the election is being made:

____________________ shares of common stock of Radnet, Inc. (the “Company”).

3. The date on which the property was transferred is _____________, 20_______

4. The taxable year to which this election relates is calendar year 20___________.

5. Nature of restrictions to which the property is subject:

The shares of stock are subject to the provisions of a Stock Award Agreement (the “Agreement”) between the undersigned and the Company.  The shares of stock are subject to forfeiture under the terms of the Agreement.

6. The Fair Market Value of the property at the time of transfer (determined without regard to any lapse restriction) was $__________ per share, [for a total of $__________.]

7. The amount paid by taxpayer for the property was $__________.

8. A copy of this statement has been furnished to the Company.

Dated:  _____________ __, 20________.

_______________________________________

[Taxpayer’s Name]

7

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31. 1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Howard G. Berger, M.D., certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RadNet, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012.

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d) –15(f)) and internal control over reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of this period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 10, 2012

By:	/s/ Howard G. Berger, M.D.
	Howard G. Berger, M.D.
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark D. Stolper, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RadNet, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012.

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d) –15(f)) and internal control over reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of this period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  May 10, 2012

By:	/s/ Mark D. Stolper
	Mark D. Stolper
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RadNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Howard G. Berger, M.D., Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Howard G. Berger, M.D.

Howard G. Berger, M.D.

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

May 10, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RadNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Mark D. Stolper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Mark D. Stolper

Mark D. Stolper

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

May 10, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

NOTE 2 - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Condensed Financial Information of Parent Company Only Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 2 — SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION

The following tables present unaudited interim condensed consolidating financial information for: (a) RadNet, Inc. (the “Parent”) on a stand-alone basis as a guarantor of the senior secured term loan due 2016 and the senior notes due 2018 ; (b) Radnet Management, Inc., the subsidiary issuer (the “Subsidiary Issuer”) of the senior secured term loan due 2016 and the senior notes due 2018; (c) on a combined basis, the guarantor subsidiaries (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) of the senior secured term loan due 2016 and the senior notes due 2018, which include all other 100% owned subsidiaries of the Subsidiary Issuer; (d) on a combined basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries, which include joint venture partnerships of which the Subsidiary Issuer holds investments of 50% or greater, as well as BRMG, which we consolidate as a variable interest entity. Separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Issuer or the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because the guarantee by the Parent and each Guarantor Subsidiary is full and unconditional, joint and several. In lieu thereof, the Parent includes the following:

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	-		$	881	$	953	$	-		$	1,834
Accounts receivable, net		-			-			77,300		56,671		-			133,971
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		-			10,572			8,194		1,093		-			19,859
Total current assets		-			10,572			86,375		58,717		-			155,664
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET		-			47,014			172,378		814		-			220,206
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill		-			42,871			115,878		844		-			159,593
Other intangible assets		-			33			52,034		132		-			52,199
Deferred financing costs, net		-			12,719			-		-		-			12,719
Investment in subsidiaries		(69,410	)		256,851			9,898		-		(197,339	)		-
Investment in joint ventures		-			-			22,933		-		-			22,933
Deposits and other		-			1,298			1,672		-		-			2,970
Total assets	$	(69,410	)	$	371,358		$	461,168	$	60,507	$	(197,339	)	$	626,284
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Intercompany	$	-		$	(166,883	)	$	124,700	$	42,183	$	-		$	-
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			58,710			44,841		7,544		-			111,095
Due to affiliates		-			-			3,213		-		-			3,213
Deferred revenue		-			-			1,162		-		-			1,162
Current portion of notes payable		-			2,953			3,290		-		-			6,243
Current portion of deferred rent		-			506			503		-		-			1,009
Current portion of obligations under capital leases		-			2,597			2,861		-		-			5,458
Total current liabilities		-			(102,117	)		180,570		49,727		-			128,180
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred rent, net of current portion		-			7,766			4,919		-		-			12,685
Deferred taxes		-			-			277		-		-			277
Line of credit		-			60,700			-		-		-			60,700
Notes payable, net of current portion		-			473,562			9,013		-		-			482,575
Obligations under capital leases,net of current portion		-			857			1,410		-		-			2,267
Other non-current liabilities		-			-			8,128		-		-			8,128
Total liabilities		-			440,768			204,317		49,727		-			694,812
EQUITY DEFICIT
Total Radnet, Inc.'s equity deficit		(69,410	)		(69,410	)		256,851		9,898		(197,339	)		(69,410	)
Noncontrolling interests		-			-			-		882		-			882
Total equity deficit		(69,410	)		(69,410	)		256,851		10,780		(197,339	)		(68,528	)
Total liabilities and equity deficit	$	(69,410	)	$	371,358		$	461,168	$	60,507	$	(197,339	)	$	626,284

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	1,366		$	-	$	1,089	$	-		$	2,455
Accounts receivable, net		-			-			78,229		50,203		-			128,432
Asset held for sale		-			-			2,300		-		-			2,300
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		-			11,858			6,651		631		-			19,140
Total current assets		-			13,224			87,180		51,923		-			152,327
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET		-			46,445			168,213		869		-			215,527
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill		-			42,784			115,878		845		-			159,507
Other intangible assets		-			50			52,916		139		-			53,105
Deferred financing costs, net		-			13,490			-		-		-			13,490
Investment in subsidiaries		(70,756	)		249,763			9,974		-		(188,981	)		-
Investment in joint ventures		-			-			22,326		-		-			22,326
Deposits and other		-			1,279			1,627		-		-			2,906
Total assets	$	(70,756	)	$	367,035		$	458,114	$	53,776	$	(188,981	)	$	619,188
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Intercompany	$	-		$	(160,017	)	$	124,679	$	35,338	$	-		$	-
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			50,262			45,324		7,515		-			103,101
Due to affiliates		-			-			3,762		-		-			3,762
Deferred revenue		-			-			1,076		-		-			1,076
Current portion of notes payable		-			2,981			3,627		-		-			6,608
Current portion of deferred rent		-			502			497		-		-			999
Current portion of obligations under capital leases		-			2,996			3,838		-		-			6,834
Total current liabilities		-			(103,276	)		182,803		42,853		-			122,380
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred rent, net of current portion		-			7,734			4,673		-		-			12,407
Deferred taxes		-			-			277		-		-			277
Line of credit		-			58,000			-		-		-			58,000
Notes payable, net of current portion		-			474,165			9,881		-		-			484,046
Obligations under capital leases,net of current portion		-			1,168			2,170		-		-			3,338
Other non-current liabilities		-			-			8,547		-		-			8,547
Total liabilities		-			437,791			208,351		42,853		-			688,995
EQUITY DEFICIT
Total Radnet, Inc.'s equity deficit		(70,756	)		(70,756	)		249,763		9,974		(188,981	)		(70,756	)
Noncontrolling interests		-			-			-		949		-			949
Total equity deficit		(70,756	)		(70,756	)		249,763		10,923		(188,981	)		(69,807	)
Total liabilities and equity deficit	$	(70,756	)	$	367,035		$	458,114	$	53,776	$	(188,981	)	$	619,188

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
NET SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts	$	-		$	34,544		$	119,581		$	14,375		$	-		$	168,500
Provision for bad debts		-			(1,267	)		(4,598	)		(619	)		-			(6,484	)
Net service fee revenue		-			33,277			114,983			13,756			-			162,016
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of operations		-			30,386			91,505			13,509			-			135,400
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,147			11,683			62			-			14,892
Loss on sale of equipment		-			137			(113	)		-			-			24
Severance costs		-			33			390			26			-			449
Total operating expenses		-			33,703			103,465			13,597			-			150,765
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		-			(426	)		11,518			159			-			11,251
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		-			7,978			5,589			-			-			13,567
Other expenses (income)		-			(1,213	)		66			-			-			(1,147	)
Total other expenses		-			6,765			5,655			-			-			12,420
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURES		-			(7,191	)		5,863			159			-			(1,169	)
Provision for income taxes		-			(2	)		(243	)		-			-			(245	)
Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries		(111	)		7,082			200			-			(7,171	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			1,262			-			-			1,262
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(111	)		(111	)		7,082			159			(7,171	)		(152	)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			(41	)		-			(41	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC.COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(111	)	$	(111	)	$	7,082		$	200		$	(7,171	)	$	(111	)

	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
NET SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts	$	-		$	31,116		$	97,839		$	15,128		$	-		$	144,083
Provision for bad debts		-			(991	)		(3,488	)		(552	)		-			(5,031	)
Net service fee revenue		-			30,125			94,351			14,576			-			139,052
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of operations		-			26,728			75,112			13,988			-			115,828
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,496			10,315			110			-			13,921
Loss on sale of equipment		-			87			172			-			-			259
Severance costs		-			69			76			-			-			145
Total operating expenses		-			30,380			85,675			14,098			-			130,153
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		-			(255	)		8,676			478			-			8,899
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		-			7,319			5,578			18			-			12,915
Other income		-			(1,871	)		-			-			-			(1,871	)
Total other expenses		-			5,448			5,578			18			-			11,044
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURES		-			(5,703	)		3,098			460			-			(2,145	)
Provision for income taxes		-			(13	)		(132	)		(2	)		-			(147	)
Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries		(876	)		4,840			390			-			(4,354	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			1,484			-			-			1,484
NET INCOME (LOSS)		(876	)		(876	)		4,840			458			(4,354	)		(808	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			68			-			68
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC.COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(876	)	$	(876	)	$	4,840		$	390		$	(4,354	)	$	(876	)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net income (loss)	$	(111	)	$	(111	)	$	7,082		$	159		$	(7,171	)	$	(152	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,147			11,683			62			-			14,892
Provision for bad debts		-			1,267			4,598			619			-			6,484
Equity in (earnings) loss of consolidated subsidiaries		111			(7,082	)		(200	)		-			7,171			-
Distributions from consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			276			-			(276	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			(1,262	)		-			-			(1,262	)
Distributions from joint ventures		-			-			1,575			-			-			1,575
Deferred rent amortization		-			36			252			-			-			288
Amortization of deferred financing cost		-			771			-			-			-			771
Amortization of bond discount		-			65			-			-			-			65
Loss (gain) on sale of equipment		-			137			(113	)		-			-			24
Amortization of cash flow hedge		-			276			-			-			-			276
Stock-based compensation		-			294			881			-			-			1,175
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase transactions:
Accounts receivable		-			-			(3,014	)		(9,009	)		-			(12,023	)
Other current assets		-			1,286			(1,472	)		(497	)		-			(683	)
Other assets		-			(19	)		(45	)		-			-			(64	)
Deferred revenue		-			-			86			-			-			86
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			3,175			(8,028	)		8,832			-			3,979
Net cash provided by operating activities		-			3,242			12,299			166			(276	)		15,431
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of imaging facilities		-			-			(580	)		-			-			(580	)
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(4,445	)		(9,517	)		-			-			(13,962	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		-			43			367			-			-			410
Proceeds from sale of imaging facilities		-			-			2,300			-			-			2,300
Purchase of equity interest in joint ventures		-			-			(920	)		-			-			(920	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(4,402	)		(8,350	)		-			-			(12,752	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on notes and leases payable		-			(1,406	)		(3,073	)		-			-			(4,479	)
Deferred financing costs		-			-			-			-			-			-
Proceeds from, net of payments on, line of credit		-			2,700			-			-			-			2,700
Payments to counterparties of interest rate swaps, net of amounts received		-			(1,500	)		-			-			-			(1,500	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			(302	)		276			(26	)
Net cash used in financing activities		-			(206	)		(3,073	)		(302	)		276			(3,305	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH								5			-						5
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		-			(1,366	)		881			(136	)		-			(621	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		-			1,366			-			1,089			-			2,455
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	-		$	-		$	881		$	953		$	-		$	1,834

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	Parent			Subsidiary Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net income (loss)	$	(876	)	$	(876	)	$	4,840		$	458		$	(4,354	)	$	(808	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		-			3,496			10,315			110			-			13,921
Provision for bad debts		-			991			3,489			551			-			5,031
Equity in (earnings) loss of consolidated subsidiaries		876			(4,840	)		(390	)		-			4,354			-
Distributions from consolidated subsidiaries		-			-			344			-			(344	)		-
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		-			-			(1,484	)		-			-			(1,484	)
Distributions from joint ventures		-			-			1,764			-			-			1,764
Deferred rent amortization		-			69			36			-			-			105
Amortization of deferred financing cost		-			748			-			-			-			748
Amortization of bond discount		-			58			-			-			-			58
Loss on sale of equipment		-			87			172			-			-			259
Amortization of cash flow hedge		-			306			-			-			-			306
Stock-based compensation		-			262			786			-			-			1,048
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase transactions:
Accounts receivable		-			-			(7,746	)		(4,861	)		-			(12,607	)
Other current assets		-			(981	)		(981	)		(383	)		-			(2,345	)
Other assets		-			41			10			-			-			51
Deferred revenue		-			-			(186	)		-			-			(186	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		-			(8,679	)		13,167			4,847			-			9,335
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		-			(9,318	)		24,136			722			(344	)		15,196
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of imaging facilities		-			-			(6,343	)		-			-			(6,343	)
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(3,167	)		(11,830	)		(619	)		-			(15,616	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		-			-			235			-			-			235
Purchase of equity interest in joint ventures		-			-			(1,500	)		-			-			(1,500	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(3,167	)		(19,438	)		(619	)		-			(23,224	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on notes and leases payable		-			(1,890	)		(4,515	)		(85	)		-			(6,490	)
Deferred financing costs		-			(218	)		-			-			-			(218	)
Proceeds from, net of payments on, line of credit		-			15,900			-			-			-			15,900
Payments to counterparties of interest rate swaps, net of amounts received		-			(1,611	)		-			-			-			(1,611	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-			-			-			(377	)		344			(33	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			99			-			-			-			99
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		-			12,280			(4,515	)		(462	)		344			7,647
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH								13			-						13
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		-			(205	)		196			(359	)		-			(368	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		-			205			-			422			-			627
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,  end of period	$	-		$	-		$	196		$	63		$	-		$	259

XML

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Business Description and Basis of Presentation [Text Block]

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

At March 31, 2012, we operated a group of regional networks comprised of 232 centers, which we operate directly or indirectly through joint ventures located in seven states with operations primarily in California, Maryland, Florida, Delaware, New Jersey, Rhode Island and New York.  We provide diagnostic imaging services including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), nuclear medicine, mammography, ultrasound, diagnostic radiology, or X-ray, fluoroscopy and other related procedures. Our operations comprise a single segment for financial reporting purposes.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Radnet Management, Inc. (or “Radnet Management”) and Beverly Radiology Medical Group III, a professional partnership (“BRMG”).  The consolidated financial statements also include Radnet Management I, Inc., Radnet Management II, Inc.,  Radiologix, Inc., Radnet Managed Imaging Services, Inc., Delaware Imaging Partners, Inc., New Jersey Imaging Partners, Inc. and Diagnostic Imaging Services, Inc. (“DIS”), all wholly owned subsidiaries of Radnet Management.  All of these affiliated entities are referred to collectively as “RadNet”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company” in this report.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 810-10-15-14 stipulates that generally any entity with a) insufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by any parties, or b) equity holders that, as a group, lack the characteristics specified in the Codification which evidence a controlling financial interest, is considered a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”).  We consolidate all voting interest entities in which we own a majority voting interest and all VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary. We determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE through a qualitative analysis that identifies which variable interest holder has the controlling financial interest in the VIE. The variable interest holder who has both of the following has the controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In performing our analysis, we consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: the design and activities of the VIE, the terms of the contracts the VIE has entered into, the nature of the VIE’s variable interests issued and how they were negotiated with or marketed to potential investors, and which parties participated significantly in the design or redesign of the entity.

Howard G. Berger, M.D. is our President and Chief Executive Officer, a member of our Board of Directors and is deemed to be the beneficial owner, directly and indirectly, of approximately 14.1% of our outstanding common stock as of March 31, 2012. Dr. Berger also owns, indirectly, 99% of the equity interests in BRMG. BRMG provides all of the professional medical services at the majority of our facilities located in California under a management agreement with us, and employs physicians or contracts with various other independent physicians and physician groups to provide the professional medical services at most of our other California facilities. We generally obtain professional medical services from BRMG in California, rather than provide such services directly or through subsidiaries, in order to comply with California’s prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine. However, as a result of our close relationship with Dr. Berger and BRMG, we believe that we are able to better ensure that medical service is provided at our California facilities in a manner consistent with our needs and expectations and those of our referring physicians, patients and payers than if we obtained these services from unaffiliated physician groups. BRMG is a partnership of ProNet Imaging Medical Group, Inc., Breastlink Medical Group, Inc. and Beverly Radiology Medical Group, Inc., each of which are 99% or 100% owned by Dr. Berger.  RadNet provides non-medical, technical and administrative services to BRMG for which it receives a management fee, pursuant to the terms of the management agreement.  Through the management agreement and our relationship with Dr. Berger, we have exclusive authority over all non-medical decision making related to the ongoing business operations of BRMG. Through our management agreement with BRMG we determine the annual budget of BRMG and make all physician employment decisions.  BRMG has insignificant operating assets and liabilities, and de minimis equity.  Through the management agreement with us, all of BRMG’s cash flows are transferred to us.  We have determined that BRMG is a variable interest entity, and that we are the primary beneficiary, and consequently, we consolidate the revenue and expenses of BRMG. BRMG recognized $12.7 million and $12.7 million of revenue, net of management service fees to RadNet, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $12.7 million and $12.7 million of operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  RadNet recognized $50.4 million and $47.8 million of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for management services provided to BRMG relating primarily to the technical portion of total billed revenue.  The cash flows of BRMG are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The creditors of BRMG do not have recourse to our general credit and there are no other arrangements that could expose us to losses.  However, BRMG is managed to recognize no net income or net loss and, therefore, RadNet may be required to provide financial support to cover any operating expenses in excess of operating revenues.

Aside from centers in California where we contract with BRMG for the provision of professional medical services and consolidate 100% of the patient service revenue, at the remaining centers in California and at all of the centers which are located outside of California, we have entered into long-term contracts with independent radiology groups in the area to provide physician services at those facilities.  These third party radiology practices provide professional services, including supervision and interpretation of diagnostic imaging procedures, in our diagnostic imaging centers.  The radiology practices maintain full control over the provision of professional services. The contracted radiology practices generally have outstanding physician and practice credentials and reputations; strong competitive market positions; a broad sub-specialty mix of physicians; a history of growth and potential for continued growth.  In these facilities we enter into long-term agreements with radiology practice groups (typically 40 years). Under these arrangements, we provide management services and receive a fee which includes 100% of the technical reimbursements associated with imaging procedures for the use of our diagnostic imaging equipment and the provision of technical services.  Our management service fees also include a portion of the practice group’s professional revenue, including revenue derived outside of our diagnostic imaging centers as well as fees for administrative services. The radiology practice groups retain the professional reimbursements associated with imaging procedures after deducting management service fees paid to us.  We have no financial controlling interest in the independent (non-BRMG) radiology practices; accordingly, we do not consolidate the financial statements of those practices in our consolidated financial statements and record only our management service fee revenue.

 The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles complete financial statements; however, in the opinion of our management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 have been made. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Significant accounting policies

As of the period covered in this report, there have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies we use, and have explained, in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 with the exception of the following:

Revenues

Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts, consists of net patient fees received from various payers and patients themselves based mainly upon established contractual billing rates, less allowances for contractual adjustments.  As it relates to BRMG centers, this service fee revenue includes payments for both the professional medical interpretation revenue recognized by BRMG as well as the payment for all other aspects related to our providing the imaging services, for which we earn management fees from BRMG.  As it relates to non-BRMG centers, this service fee revenue  is earned through providing the administration of the non-medical functions relating to the professional medical practice at our non-BRMG centers, including among other functions, provision of clerical and administrative personnel, bookkeeping and accounting services, billing and collection, provision of medical and office supplies, secretarial, reception and transcription services, maintenance of medical records, and advertising, marketing and promotional activities.

Service fee revenues are recorded during the period the patient services are provided based upon the estimated amounts due from the patients and third-party payers. Third-party payers include federal and state agencies (under the Medicare and Medicaid programs), managed care health plans, commercial insurance companies and employers. Estimates of contractual allowances under managed care health plans are based upon the payment terms specified in the related contractual agreements. Contractual payment terms in managed care agreements are generally based upon predetermined rates per discounted fee-for-service rates. We also record a provision for doubtful accounts (based primarily on historical collection experience) related to patients and copayment and deductible amounts for patients who have health care coverage under one of our third-party payers.

Our service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts less the provision for bad debts for the three months ended March 31, are summarized in the following table (in thousands):

	2012			2011
Commercial Insurance	$	93,518		$	79,390
Managed Care Capitated Payors		24,770			21,612
Medicare		33,026			28,384
Medicaid		5,729			4,899
Other		11,458			9,798
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts		168,500			144,083
Provision for bad debts		(6,484	)		(5,031	)
Net service fee revenue	$	162,016		$	139,052

The break-out of our service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts, is calculated based upon global payments received from consolidated imaging centers from dates of service from each respective period illustrated.

Provision for Bad Debts

Although outcomes vary, our policy is to attempt to collect amounts due from patients, including co-payments and deductibles due from patients with insurance, at the time of service. We provide for an allowance against accounts receivable that could become uncollectible by establishing an allowance to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. We estimate this allowance based on the aging of our accounts receivable by each type of payer over an 18-month look-back period, and other relevant factors. A significant portion of our provision for bad debt relates to co-payments and deductibles owed to us by patients with insurance. There are various factors that can impact collection trends, such as changes in the economy, which in turn have an impact on the increased burden of co-payments and deductibles to be made by patients with insurance. These factors continuously change and can have an impact on collection trends and our estimation process.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the three months ended March 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to conform with the three months ended March 31, 2012 presentation. Additionally, we have adjusted prior year’s presentation as a result of the adoption of ASU 2011-07, Health Care Entities (Topic 954). In connection with this adjustment, we identified certain mechanical errors in our historical calculation of the provision for bad debts, resulting in the gross up of the provision for bad debts and revenues by $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The error has been corrected in these financial statements and upon adoption of the new guidance, resulted in no impact to net service fee revenue.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had a working capital balance of $27.5 million and $30.0 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  We had a net loss attributable to RadNet, Inc.’s common stockholders of $111,000 and $876,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  We also had an equity deficit of $68.5 million and $69.8 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

We operate in a capital intensive, high fixed-cost industry that requires significant amounts of capital to fund operations.  In addition to operations, we require a significant amount of capital for the initial start-up and development expense of new diagnostic imaging facilities, the acquisition of additional facilities and new diagnostic imaging equipment.  Because our cash flows from operations have been insufficient to fund all of these capital requirements, we have depended on the availability of financing under credit arrangements with third parties.

Our business strategy with regard to operations focuses on the following:

· maximizing performance at our existing facilities;

· focusing on profitable contracting;

· expanding MRI, CT and PET applications;

· optimizing operating efficiencies; and

· expanding our networks.

On April 6, 2010, we completed a series of transactions which we refer to as our "debt refinancing plan" for an aggregate of $585.0 million.  As part of the debt refinancing plan, our wholly owned subsidiary Radnet Management, Inc. issued and sold $200.0 million in 10 3/8% senior notes due 2018 (the "senior notes"). All payments of the senior notes, including principal and interest, are guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior unsecured basis by RadNet, Inc. and all of Radnet Management’s current and future domestic wholly owned restricted subsidiaries. The senior notes were issued under an indenture, dated April 6, 2010, by and among Radnet Management, as issuer, RadNet, Inc., as parent guarantor, the subsidiary guarantors thereof and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, in a private placement that was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  We subsequently exchanged the senior notes initially issued on April 6, 2010 in a private placement for publicly registered exchange notes with nearly identical terms.  The exchange offer was completed on February 14, 2011.

In addition to the issuance of senior notes, Radnet Management entered into a new Credit and Guaranty Agreement with a syndicate of lenders (the "New Credit Agreement"), whereby Radnet Management obtained $385.0 million in senior secured first-lien bank financing, consisting of (i) a $285.0 million, six-year term loan facility and (ii) a $100.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a swing line subfacility and a letter of credit subfacility (collectively, the “New Credit Facilities”). Radnet Management’s obligations under the New Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by RadNet, Inc., all of Radnet Management’s current and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries as well as certain affiliates, including Beverly Radiology Medical Group III and its equity holders (Beverly Radiology Medical Group, Inc., BreastLink Medical Group, Inc. and ProNet Imaging Medical Group, Inc.). These New Credit Facilities created by the New Credit Agreement are secured by a perfected first-priority security interest in all of Radnet Management’s and the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets, including, but not limited to, pledges of equity interests of Radnet Management and all of our current and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries.

In connection with the issuance of the outstanding senior notes and entering into the New Credit Agreement, Radnet Management used the net proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes and the New Credit Facilities created by the New Credit Agreement to repay in full its existing first lien term loan for $242.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding, which would have matured on November 15, 2012, and its second lien term loan for $170.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding, which would have matured on November 15, 2013.

On November 8, 2011, in conjunction with our acquisition of the U.S. imaging operations of CML HealthCare Inc. (RH), we increased the size of our revolving credit facility by $21.25 million, to $121.25 million of total borrowing capacity (the “Incremental Commitments”).  The increased facility size will provide additional borrowing availability to fund further acquisitions and general working capital needs.

At March 31, 2012, we had $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes outstanding, $279.3 million of senior secured term loan debt outstanding and $60.7 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility.  We had $60.55 million of available credit under our revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing conditions under that facility as further described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants under the New Credit Facilities and the senior notes.

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 1,834	$ 2,455
Accounts receivable, net	133,971	128,432
Asset held for sale		2,300
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	19,859	19,140
Total current assets	155,664	152,327
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET	220,206	215,527
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill	159,593	159,507
Other intangible assets	52,199	53,105
Deferred financing costs, net	12,719	13,490
Investment in joint ventures	22,933	22,326
Deposits and other	2,970	2,906
Total assets	626,284	619,188
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other	111,095	103,101
Due to affiliates	3,213	3,762
Deferred revenue	1,162	1,076
Current portion of notes payable	6,243	6,608
Current portion of deferred rent	1,009	999
Current portion of obligations under capital leases	5,458	6,834
Total current liabilities	128,180	122,380
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred rent, net of current portion	12,685	12,407
Deferred taxes	277	277
Line of credit	60,700	58,000
Notes payable, net of current portion	482,575	484,046
Obligations under capital lease, net of current portion	2,267	3,338
Other non-current liabilities	8,128	8,547
Total liabilities	694,812	688,995
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
EQUITY DEFICIT
Common stock - $.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 38,225,482, and 37,426,460 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively	4	4
Paid-in-capital	166,971	165,796
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(664)	(946)
Accumulated deficit	(235,721)	(235,610)
Total Radnet, Inc.'s equity deficit	(69,410)	(70,756)
Noncontrolling interests	882	949
Total equity deficit	(68,528)	(69,807)
Total liabilities and equity deficit	$ 626,284	$ 619,188

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY DEFICIT (USD $) In Thousands	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]	Parent [Member]	Noncontrolling Interest [Member]	Total
BALANCE at Dec. 31, 2011	$ 4	$ 165,796	$ (235,610)	$ (946)	$ (70,756)	$ 949	$ (69,807)
BALANCE (in Shares) at Dec. 31, 2011	37,426,460
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options/warrants (in Shares)	74,022
Stock-based compensation		1,175			1,175		1,175
Issuance of restricted stock (in Shares)	725,000
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests						(26)	(26)
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment				6	6		6
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge from prior periods reclassified to earnings				276	276		276
Net loss			(111)		(111)	(41)	(152)
BALANCE at Mar. 31, 2012	$ 4	$ 166,971	$ (235,721)	$ (664)	$ (69,410)	$ 882	$ (68,528)
BALANCE (in Shares) at Mar. 31, 2012	38,225,482

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$ (152)	$ (808)
Depreciation and amortization	14,892	13,921
Provision for bad debt	6,484	5,031
Equity in earnings of joint ventures	(1,262)	(1,484)
Distributions from joint ventures	1,575	1,764
Deferred rent amortization	288	105
Amortization of deferred financing cost	771	748
Amortization of bond discount	65	58
Loss on sale and disposal of equipment	24	259
Amortization of cash flow hedge	276	306
Stock-based compensation	1,175	1,048
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase transactions:
Accounts receivable	(12,023)	(12,607)
Other current assets	(683)	(2,345)
Other assets	(64)	51
Deferred revenue	86	(186)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other	3,979	9,335
Net cash provided by operating activities	15,431	15,196
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of imaging facilities	(580)	(6,343)
Purchase of property and equipment	(13,962)	(15,616)
Proceeds from sale of equipment	410	235
Proceeds from sale of imaging facilities	2,300
Purchase of equity interest in joint ventures	(920)	(1,500)
Net cash used in investing activities	(12,752)	(23,224)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on notes and leases payable	(4,479)	(6,490)
Deferred financing costs		(218)
Proceeds from, net of payments on, line of credit	2,700	15,900
Payments to counterparties of interest rate swaps, net of amounts received	(1,500)	(1,611)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(26)	(33)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of options/warrants		99
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(3,305)	7,647
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH	5	13
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(621)	(368)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period	2,455	627
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	1,834	259
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for interest	$ 6,841	$ 6,330

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Common stock - par value (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common stock - shares authorized	200,000,000	200,000,000
Common stock - shares issued	38,225,482	37,426,460
Common stock - shares outstanding	38,225,482	37,426,460

XML

NOTE 10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Subsequent Events [Text Block]

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 10, 2012, we completed our acquisition of West Coast Radiology, which consists of five multi-modality imaging centers in Orange County, California, for cash consideration of $8.1 million and the assumption of approximately $1.4 million of capital lease debt. The centers are located in Anaheim, Santa Ana/Tustin, Irvine and Mission Viejo/Laguna Niguel and operate a combination of MRI, CT, ultrasound, mammography, x-ray and other related modalities. 

XML

Document And Entity Information (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	May 04, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	RadNet, Inc.
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		38,225,482
Entity Public Float			$ 134,755,971
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0000790526
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
NET SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Service fee revenue, net of contractual allowances and discounts	$ 168,500	$ 144,083
Provision for bad debts	(6,484)	(5,031)
Net service fee revenue	162,016	139,052
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of operations	135,400	115,828
Depreciation and amortization	14,892	13,921
Loss on sale and disposal of equipment	24	259
Severance costs	449	145
Total operating expenses	150,765	130,153
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS	11,251	8,899
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense	13,567	12,915
Other income	(1,147)	(1,871)
Total other expenses	12,420	11,044
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURES	(1,169)	(2,145)
Provision for income taxes	(245)	(147)
Equity in earnings of joint ventures	1,262	1,484
NET LOSS	(152)	(808)
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(41)	68
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$ (111)	$ (876)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.00	$ (0.02)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING Basic and diluted (in Shares)	37,669,921	37,257,683

XML

NOTE 5 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

NOTE 5 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding, net of common stock held in treasury,  as follows (in thousands except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2012			2011
Net loss attributable to Radnet, Inc.'s common stockholders	$	(111	)	$	(876	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year		37,669,921			37,257,683
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to Radnet, Inc.'s common stockholders	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.02	)

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we excluded all options and warrants in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their effect is anti-dilutive.

XML

NOTE 4 - RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

NOTE 4 – RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) (“ASU 2011-04”), which contains amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosures in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 explains how to measure fair value for financial reporting. The guidance does not require fair value measurements in addition to those already required or permitted by other Topics. This ASU was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which updates existing guidance on comprehensive income. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income, which was our previous presentation. It requires companies to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two statement approach which we have adopted, the first statement presents total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that presents total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income and the total of comprehensive income. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any effect on our financial condition or results of operations, though it did change our financial statement presentation.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-07, “Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation and Disclosure of Patient Service Revenue, Provision for Bad Debts, and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for Certain Health Care Entities,” which requires health care entities to present the provision for doubtful accounts relating to patient service revenue as a deduction from patient service revenue in the statement of operations rather than as an operating expense. Additional disclosures relating to sources of patient revenue and the allowance for doubtful accounts related to patient accounts receivable are also required. Such additional disclosures are included in Note 1. The adoption of this ASU had no impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, although it did change our financial statement presentation.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment”, simplifying how a company is required to test goodwill for impairment. Companies will now have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the company determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.

XML

NOTE 8 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block]

NOTE 8 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Options and Warrants

We have two long-term incentive plans that currently have outstanding stock options which we refer to as the 2000 Plan and the 2006 Plan. The 2000 Plan was terminated as to future grants when the 2006 Plan was approved by the stockholders in 2006.  As of March 31, 2012, we have reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan 11,000,000 shares of common stock. Certain options granted under the 2006 Plan to employees are intended to qualify as incentive stock options under existing tax regulations. In addition, we may issue non-qualified stock options and warrants under the 2006 Plan from time to time to non-employees, in connection with acquisitions and for other purposes and we may also issue stock under the 2006 Plan. Stock options and warrants generally vest over two to five years and expire five to ten years from date of grant.

As of March 31, 2012, 4,729,750, or approximately 72.8%, of the 6,496,250 outstanding stock options and warrants granted under our option plans are fully vested.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we did not grant options or warrants under the 2006 Plan.

We have issued warrants outside the 2006 Plan under various types of arrangements to employees, and in exchange for outside services.  All warrants issued to employees or consultants after our February 2007 listing on the NASDAQ Global Market have been characterized as awards under the 2006 Plan.  All warrants outside the 2006 Plan have been issued with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The warrants expire from five to seven years from the date of grant.  Vesting terms are determined by the board of directors or the compensation committee of the board of directors at the date of grant.

As of March 31, 2012, 1,502,898, or 100%, of all the outstanding warrants outside the 2006 Plan are fully vested.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we did not grant warrants outside of our 2006 Plan.

The following summarizes all of our option and warrant transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

Outstanding Options and Warrants Under the 2006 Plan and 2000 Plan	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise price Per Common Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic
Balance, December 31, 2011		6,656,250		$	3.62
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Canceled or expired		(160,000	)		4.65
Balance, March 31, 2012		6,496,250			3.60		2.67	$	2,791,475
Exercisable at March 31, 2012		4,729,750			3.64		2.35		2,103,575

Non-Plan Outstanding Warrants	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise price Per Common Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance, December 31, 2011		2,502,898		$	2.58
Granted		-			-
Exercised		(250,000	)		2.52
Canceled or expired		(750,000	)		4.77
Balance, March 31, 2012		1,502,898			1.50		1.40	$	2,528,170
Exercisable at March 31, 2012		1,502,898			1.50		1.40		2,528,170

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (the difference between our closing stock price on March 31, 2012 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holder had all option holders exercised their options on March 31, 2012. Total intrinsic value of options and warrants exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $265,000 and $189,075, respectively.  As of March 31, 2012, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested employee awards was approximately $2.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.8 years.

Restricted Stock Awards

The 2006 Plan permits the award of restricted stock.  On January 3, 2012, we granted 525,000 restricted stock awards (“awards”) to certain employees and 200,000 awards to non-employee directors of the Company. Of the awards granted, 241,667 were vested on the award date, 241,667 cliff vest after one year provided that the employees or non-employees remain continuously employed or engaged through the vesting date and 241,667 cliff vest after two years provided that the employees or non-employees remain continuously employed or engaged through the vesting date. We valued the award based on the closing market price of our stock on January 3, 2012 which was $2.17 per share.

At March 31, 2012, the total unrecognized fair value of these restricted stock awards was approximately $918,000, which will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of 1.75 years.

In sum, of the 11,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan, 7,221,250 are outstanding with respect to grants of options, warrants and restricted stock and 3,778,750 are available for grant.

XML

NOTE 6 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Derivatives and Fair Value [Text Block]

NOTE 6 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations.  The primary risk managed by us using derivative instruments is interest rate risk.  We have in the past entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk exposure.  The interest rate swap agreements utilized by us effectively modified our exposure to interest rate risk by converting our floating-rate debt to a fixed rate basis during the period of the interest rate swap, thus reducing the impact of interest-rate changes on future interest expense.

At inception, we designated our interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of floating-rate borrowings.  In accordance with ASC Topic 815, derivatives that have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedging instruments are reported at fair value. The gain or loss on the effective portion of the hedge (i.e., change in fair value) is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statement of equity deficit. The remaining gain or loss, if any, is recognized currently in earnings. Unrealized gain or loss on the change in fair value of interest rate swaps that do not qualify as hedges are recognized in earnings.

As a result of our refinancing and the New Credit Agreement and the issuance of the senior notes completed on April 6, 2010, our interest rate swaps do not match the terms of our current bank debt and so accordingly, we have determined that they are no longer designated as cash flow hedges.  Accordingly, all changes in their fair value after April 6, 2010 are, and will continue to be recognized in earnings.  As of April 6, 2010, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a negative $10.4 million.

The related Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCL) of $3.1 million associated with the negative fair values of these interest rate swaps on April 6, 2010, the date of our refinancing, is being amortized on a straight-line basis to interest expense through November 15, 2012, the maturity date of these cash flow hedges.  From April 6, 2010 to March 31, 2012, approximately $2.5 million of AOCL was amortized to interest expense bringing the remaining balance of AOCL to approximately $643,000 at March 31, 2012.

At March 31, 2012 the negative fair value of these interest rate swaps was $3.9 million and was classified as other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recognized approximately $1.2 million in other income related to the change in fair value of these interest rate swaps.

A tabular presentation of the fair value of derivative instruments as of December 31, 2011 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value – Asset (Liability) Derivatives
Derivatives
Interest rate contracts	Other non-current liabilities	$(5,064)

A tabular presentation of the fair value of derivative instruments as of March 31, 2012 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value – Asset (Liability) Derivatives
Derivatives
Interest rate contracts	Other non-current liabilities	$ (3,851)

A tabular presentation of the effect of derivative instruments on our statement of operations is as follows (amounts in thousands):

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Ineffective Interest Rate Swap	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Interest rate contracts	None	$1,213	Other income/ (expense)	*   ($276)	Interest income/(expense)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Ineffective Interest Rate Swap	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Interest rate contracts	None	$1,371	Other income/ (expense)	*   ($306)	Interest income/(expense)

  *    Amortization of OCI associated with the cash flow hedges through April 6, 2010 (see discussion above).

XML

NOTE 7 - INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 7 – INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

We have nine unconsolidated joint ventures with ownership interests ranging from 35% to 50%. These joint ventures represent partnerships with hospitals, health systems or radiology practices and were formed for the purpose of owning and operating diagnostic imaging centers.  Professional services at the joint venture diagnostic imaging centers are performed by contracted radiology practices or a radiology practice that participates in the joint venture.  Our investment in these joint ventures is accounted for under the equity method.   Investment in joint ventures increased approximately $607,000 to $22.9 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $22.3 million at December 31, 2011.  This increase is primarily related to additional equity contributions made to one of these joint ventures of approximately $920,000 as well as our recording of equity earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of approximately $1.3 million.   Offsetting this increase is our respective share of distributions received during the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $1.6 million.  

We received management service fees from the centers underlying these joint ventures of approximately $1.9 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and eliminated the uncollected portion of the fees earned associated with our ownership from our net revenue with an offsetting increase to our equity earnings.

The following table is a summary of key financial data for these joint ventures as of March 31, 2012 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

Balance Sheet Data:	March 31, 2012
Current assets	$	16,437
Noncurrent assets		42,622
Current liabilities		(9,340	)
Noncurrent liabilities		(8,342	)
Total net assets	$	41,377
Book value of Radnet joint venture interests	$	19,122
Cost in excess of book value of acquired joint venture interests		3,511
Elimination of intercompany profit remaining on Radnet's consolidated balance sheet		300
Total value of Radnet joint venture interests	$	22,933
Total book value of other joint venture partner interests	$	22,255
Income Statement Data for the three months ended March 31,		2012			2011
Net revenue	$	21,076		$	19,004
Net income	$	2,533		$	3,239

XML

NOTE 9 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements are required to be disclosed within a fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of inputs used to determine fair value. Accordingly, assets and liabilities carried at, or permitted to be carried at, fair value are classified within the fair value hierarchy in one of the following categories based on the lowest level input that is significant to a fair value measurement:

Level 1—Fair value is determined by using unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2—Fair value is determined by using inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable. Inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in inactive markets. Related inputs can also include those used in valuation or other pricing models such as interest rates and yield curves that can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3—Fair value is determined by using inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. Use of these inputs involves significant and subjective judgment.

The table below summarizes the estimated fair values of certain of our financial liabilities that are subject to fair value measurements, and the classification of these liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, as follows (in thousands):

	As of March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:
Interest Rate Swaps	$	-	$	3,851	$	-	$	3,851

	As of December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:
Interest Rate Swaps	$	-	$	5,064	$	-	$	5,064

The estimated fair value of these swaps, which are discussed in Note 6, was determined using Level 2 inputs.  More specifically, the fair value was determined by calculating the value of the difference between the fixed interest rate of the interest rate swaps and the counterparty’s forward LIBOR curve, which would be the input used in the valuations.  The forward LIBOR curve is readily available in the public markets or can be derived from information available in the public markets.

The table below summarizes the estimated fair value and carrying amount of our long-term debt follows (in thousands):

	As of March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value		Total Carrying Value
Senior Secured Term Loan		-		278,602		-		278,602		279,300
Senior Notes		-		199,500		-		199,500		200,000

	As of December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Total Carrying Value
Senior Secured Term Loan		-		264,600		-		264,600		280,000
Senior Notes		-		180,000		-		180,000		200,000

The estimated fair value of our long-term debt, which is discussed in Note 1, was determined using Level 2 inputs primarily related to comparable market prices

We consider the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, other current assets and current liabilities to approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization or payment.  Additionally, we consider the carrying amount of our capital lease obligations to approximate their fair value because the weighted average interest rate used to formulate the carrying amounts approximates current market rates.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
NET LOSS	$ (152)	$ (808)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	6	30
Reclassification of net cash flow hedge losses included in net loss during the period	276	306
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	130	(472)
Less comprehensive income (loss) attributible to non-controlling interests	(41)	68
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTIBLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$ 89	$ (404)

XML

NOTE 3 - FACILITY ACQUISITIONS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Property, Plant and Equipment, Schedule of Significant Acquisitions and Disposals [Table Text Block]

NOTE 3 – FACILITY ACQUISITIONS

On February 29, 2012, we completed the acquisition of a multi modality imaging center from TODIC, L.P. located in Camarillo, California for cash consideration of $350,000 and the assumption of a $121,000 capital lease liability. The facility provides MRI, CT, mammography, ultrasound and X-ray services. We have made a fair value determination of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and approximately $425,000 of fixed assets and $86,000 of goodwill was recorded with respect to this transaction as well as the assumption of approximately $40,000 of accrued liabilities.

On February 29, 2012, we completed the acquisition of a multi modality imaging center from Progressive MRI, LLC located in Frederick, Maryland for cash consideration of $230,000. The facility provides MRI, CT, mammography, ultrasound and X-ray services. We have made a fair value determination of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and approximately $230,000 of fixed assets was recorded with respect to this transaction.