XML 44 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Fair Value Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosure
Fair Value Disclosure

Recurring Fair Value Measurements: The following table presents the Company's assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
Identical Assets
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
Description
 
December 31, 2016
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available for sale securities
 
$
7,882

 
$
7,882

 
$

 
$

Interest rate swap agreements
 
774

 

 
774

 

Foreign currency exchange contracts
 
147

 

 
147

 

 
 
$
8,803

 
$
7,882

 
$
921

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements
 
$
339

 
$

 
$
339

 
$

 
 
$
339

 
$

 
$
339

 
$


 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
Identical Assets
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
Description
 
December 31, 2015
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available for sale securities
 
$
7,247

 
$
7,247

 
$

 
$

Interest rate swap agreements
 
3

 

 
3

 

Foreign currency exchange contracts
 
386

 

 
386

 

 
 
$
7,636

 
$
7,247

 
$
389

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements
 
$
698

 
$

 
$
698

 
$

 
 
$
698

 
$

 
$
698

 
$



Bellaire's Mine Water Treatment Trust invests in available for sale securities that are reported at fair value based upon quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets; therefore, they are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 7 for further discussion of Bellaire's Mine Water Treatment Trust.

The Company uses significant other observable inputs to value derivative instruments used to hedge foreign currency and interest rate risk; therefore, they are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The fair value for these contracts is determined based on exchange rates and interest rates, respectively. See Note 9 for further discussion of the Company's derivative financial instruments.

There were no transfers into or out of Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements: Centennial ceased coal production in the fourth quarter of 2015 and the Company concurrently began actively marketing Centennial's mine machinery and equipment. The Company classified these assets as held for sale during the fourth quarter of 2015 when management approved and committed to a formal plan of sale. Centennial's coal land and real estate did not meet the held-for-sale criteria and remained within property, plant and equipment as a long-lived asset.

As a result of various unfavorable conditions, including but not limited to weakness in the U.S. and global coal markets and certain asset-specific factors, the Company determined the carrying value of Centennial's coal land and real estate were not recoverable during the third quarter of 2016. The Company also conducted a review of the carrying value of Centennial's mine machinery and equipment classified as assets held for sale during the third quarter of 2016. The fair values of these assets were calculated using a combination of a market and income approach and reduced the carrying value of coal land and real estate to zero and assets held for sale to approximately $5.0 million as of September 30, 2016. The Company recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $17.4 million during the third quarter of 2016. The asset impairment charge was recorded as "Centennial asset impairment charge" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations during 2016 and relates exclusively to the NACoal segment.

The Company previously determined that indicators of potential impairment were present during the fourth quarter of 2014 with respect to its Centennial mining operations asset group. The Company assessed the recoverability of Centennial's assets and determined that the assets were not fully recoverable when compared to the remaining future undiscounted cash flows from these assets. As a result, the Company estimated the fair value of the asset group and the long-lived assets were written down to their estimated fair value which resulted in a non-cash asset impairment charge of $105.1 million during the fourth quarter of 2014. The asset impairment charge was recorded as "Centennial asset impairment charge" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations during 2014 and relates exclusively to the NACoal segment.

Other Fair Value Measurement Disclosures: The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The fair values of revolving credit agreements and long-term debt, excluding capital leases, were determined using current rates offered for similar obligations taking into account subsidiary credit risk, which is Level 2 as defined in the fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, both the fair value and the book value of revolving credit agreements and long-term debt, excluding capital leases, was $126.1 million and $159.8 million, respectively.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable and derivatives. HBB maintains significant accounts receivable balances with several large retail customers. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, receivables from HBB's five largest customers represented 55.8% and 56.8%, respectively, of the Company's consolidated net accounts receivable. In addition, under its mining contracts, NACoal recognizes revenue and a related receivable as coal or limerock is delivered or predevelopment services are provided. These mining contracts provide for monthly settlements. HBB and NACoal's significant credit concentration is uncollateralized; however, historically minimal credit losses have been incurred. To further reduce credit risk associated with accounts receivable, the Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers, but does not generally require advance payments or collateral. The Company enters into derivative contracts with high-quality financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. See Note 9 for further discussion of the Company's derivative financial instruments.