-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, EyurC3g0KQFanSVFFA9ibT100USnEaGN5g6WnrB8urn8kyusZSPv6LpNRrx9Bgdv EzX5vHLOkBXXUdd1egYI9w== 0000928790-98-000058.txt : 19980401 0000928790-98-000058.hdr.sgml : 19980401 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000928790-98-000058 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19971231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19980331 SROS: NONE FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES L P CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000785860 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE [6500] IRS NUMBER: 112827907 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-14986 FILM NUMBER: 98582986 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 242 TRUMBULL ST CITY: HARTFORD STATE: CT ZIP: 06156 BUSINESS PHONE: 2032752178 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 242 TUMBULL ST CITY: HARTFORD STATE: CT ZIP: 06156 10-K 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _________ FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to ________________ Commission file number 0-14986 AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 11-2827907 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 242 Trumbull Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (203) 275-2178 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partnership Depositary Units (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes __X___ No_____ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant: $212,635,554 (1) _____________ (1) This statement relates to Units which represent limited partnership interests in the Registrant. The amount above is calculated based on the Net Asset Value of Units of $16.71 at December 31, 1997. PART 1 Item 1. Business. Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. (the "Registrant") is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 11, 1986. The general partners of the Registrant (the "General Partners") are Aetna/AREA Corporation ("Aetna/AREA"), a Connecticut corporation that is an affiliate of Aetna Life Insurance Company ("Aetna"), and AREA GP Corporation ("AREA GP"), a Delaware corporation that is an affiliate of Lehman Brothers Inc. ("Lehman"). From March 1986 through December 31, 1990, the Registrant offered up to $300,000,000 of units which represent the economic rights attributable to limited partnership interests in the Registrant ("Units") through an ongoing public offering (the "Primary Offering") and an additional $30,000,000 of Units pursuant to the Registrant's Distribution Reinvestment Plan (the "DRIP"). In addition, in conjunction with the Primary Offering, certain holders of Units (the "Selling Unitholders") offered up to $30,000,000 of Units (the "Remarketing Opportunity"). Since January 1, 1991, the Registrant has not offered Units for sale in the Primary Offering, the Remarketing Opportunity, or the DRIP. The Registrant received an aggregate of $265,521,423 of capital contributions from the sale of 12,724,547 Units. The Registrant does not anticipate raising additional capital through the sale of Units. The Registrant is engaged in the business of investing in income-producing apartment complexes, office buildings, shopping centers and other commercial real estate offered by non-affiliated sellers ("Properties"). All investments in Properties that the Registrant has made are referred to herein collectively as "Investments in Properties". The Registrant acquired its interests in Investments in Properties either directly or through joint ventures or other partnerships that own Properties. The Registrant has acquired all of its interests in Properties entirely with cash. As of December 31, 1997, the Registrant held 13 Investments in Properties at a total cost of approximately $243.1 million. (See Item 2 in this report for a further description of the Investments in Properties.) Such Investments in Properties have been funded from the proceeds of the sale of Units and from cash retained by the Registrant from operations and from sales of Investments in Properties. The Registrant's principal objectives are to invest in Properties with the goals of obtaining: (1) cash distributions from rental and interest income; (2) capital appreciation; and (3) preservation and protection of capital. In light of the relatively strong national real estate and capital markets, the general partners are actively reviewing the potential sale of Properties. Any change in the length of a property's ownership period from that currently anticipated, could affect the real estate and leasing strategy to be followed at such property, which could alter the level of capital expenditures to be invested in the properties. These changes could affect the level of cash flow received by the Partnership, which might affect the level of quarterly cash distributions to limited partners. In 1997, the Registrant made distributions of cash generated from operations of $.18 per Unit per quarter. (See Item 5 below for additional information regarding recent quarterly distributions.) The General Partners currently anticipate that quarterly cash distributions will continue throughout 1998. The level and timing of future distributions will be reviewed on a quarterly basis by the General Partners. Net Asset Value per Unit increased to $16.71 at December 31, 1997 from $15.59 at December 31, 1996. The increase in Net Asset Value per Unit is attributable to the increases in the appraised values of certain of the Registrant's properties, primarily Summit Village, Town Center Business Park, and 115 and 117 Flanders Road. The increase in appraised value of Summit Village and 115 and 117 Flanders Road is a result of an increase in projected market rents. The increase in appraised value of Town Center Business Park is primarily due to improved occupancy and market rent assumptions. These value increases were partially offset by a decrease in the appraised value of Oakland Pointe Shopping Center due to a decrease in its forecasted occupancy from the expected departure of three major tenants, and a reduction in the market rent of some space. Competition The Registrant competes with other real estate owners and developers for tenants and potential buyers in the rental and sale of its Investments in Properties. Each of the Investments in Properties faces competition from similar properties within the same vicinity. Increases in the availability of properties competitive with the Registrant's Investments in Properties may have an adverse effect on the occupancy levels, revenues and marketability of the Registrant's Investments in Properties. Should the Registrant be in the market to acquire new or sell existing Investments in Properties, it would face competition in connection with such acquisitions or sales from businesses, individuals, fiduciary accounts and plans and other entities engaged in real estate investment, which may include certain affiliates of the General Partners. The number of entities interested and the amount of funds available for investment in properties of a type suitable for investment by the Registrant may change. Employees The Registrant has no employees. The officers, directors and employees of the General Partners and their affiliates and agents perform services for the benefit of the Registrant. These services are provided in consideration of the fees paid to the General Partners as described under Item 13 below and the expense of providing these services is not separately charged to the Registrant. Aetna/AREA has retained Allegis Realty Investors LLC to provide investment management services to the Registrant. First Data Investor Services Group, Inc. has been retained by AREA GP to provide accounting and investor communication services to the Registrant. Item 2. Properties As of December 31, 1997, the Registrant held 13 Investments in Properties. (in thousands) Historical Property Cost (1) - ----------------------------------------------- Cross Pointe Centre $ 22,783 Lincoln Square Apartments 13,622 Gateway Square 7,684 Summit Village 37,444 Village Square 5,547 Marina Bay Industrial Park 11,043 Town Center Business Park 44,415 Oakland Pointe Shopping Center 22,994 115 & 117 Flanders Road 12,774 Three Riverside Drive 10,607 Windmont Apartments 8,088 Powell Street Plaza 31,948 Westgate Distribution Center 14,113 -------- Total $243,062 -------- (1) Historical cost is before accumulated depreciation and may not equal cash invested because of certain adjustments based on the application of generally accepted accounting principles. For historical cost purposes, properties are recorded at the lower of cost, net of impairment write-downs, or estimated fair value. (See Footnote 3 to the consolidated financial statements.) The Registrant determines the current value of each of its Investments in Properties quarterly based on independent appraisals of the underlying real estate using generally accepted valuation techniques. These appraisals are used to determine Net Asset Value per Unit on a quarterly basis and to prepare the Registrant's current value financial statements. Each appraisal is based on numerous assumptions, limiting conditions and valuation techniques utilized by the independent appraisers retained by the Registrant. Two of the many assumptions utilized by the appraisers are the terminal capitalization rate and the discount rate. The terminal capitalization rate is used to estimate the reversionary proceeds to be received from the assumed sale of an investment at the end of a typical holding period. The discount rate is used to determine the net present value of the estimated annual cash flows of an investment, including the residual proceeds, over the holding period. Terminal capitalization rates utilized in the appraisals of the Investments in Properties at December 31, 1997 ranged from 8.75% to 12.00%. Discount rates utilized in the appraisals of the Investments in Properties at December 31, 1997 ranged from 11.00% to 15.00%. Current Properties - ------------------ A brief description of all Investments in Properties is set forth below. Neither the Registrant, if it owns a Property directly, nor any joint venture or partnership in which the Registrant has invested, have incurred any debt to acquire or maintain any of the Properties. Cross Pointe Centre - ------------------- The Registrant owns Cross Pointe Centre, a community shopping center with approximately 211,345 square feet of net rentable space, located on a 25.8-acre site in Centerville, Ohio. As of December 31, 1997, the shopping center was 79% leased and 75% occupied. Lincoln Square Apartments - ------------------------- The Registrant owns Lincoln Square Apartments, a 240-unit apartment project on a 12.7-acre site located in Arlington Heights, Illinois. As of December 31, 1997, the project was 94% leased and 92% occupied. Gateway Square - -------------- The Registrant owns Gateway Square, a specialty retail center located in Hinsdale, Illinois. The center contains approximately 40,366 square feet of rentable space on a 3.7-acre site. As of December 31, 1997, the retail center was 92% leased and 89% occupied. Summit Village - -------------- The Registrant owns Summit Village, a 366-unit apartment complex built in two phases on a 6.2-acre site in the Rosslyn area of Arlington County, Virginia. Historical leasing and occupancy information with respect to Summit Village for the five most recent years is as follows: Leased Occupied ------ -------- 12/31/93 96% 94% 12/31/94 99% 98% 12/31/95 99% 99% 12/31/96 98% 98% 12/31/97 99% 99% The current leases generally have terms of seven or twelve months at monthly rental rates ranging from $1,055 to $1,435 per unit. The Arlington County market includes approximately 13 Class A apartment communities with almost 5,000 units. Two new competitive high-rise apartment buildings, Stuart Park Apartments with 438 units and Courthouse Hill Apartments with 566 units, are currently under construction and could have some negative impact on Summit Village rents and occupancy. Marina Bay Industrial Park - -------------------------- The Registrant owns a controlling general partnership interest in a limited partnership that owns the Marina Bay Industrial Park, a 165,780 square foot industrial park located in Richmond, California on an 8.6-acre site. The Marina Bay Industrial Park is a four-building complex that includes a rehabilitated industrial distribution building (approximately 103,680 square feet) and three newer research/development/light industrial buildings (approximately 62,100 square feet). As of December 31, 1997, the complex was 98% leased and 93% occupied. Village Square - -------------- The Registrant owns Village Square in Hazelwood, Missouri, a community shopping center that is undergoing conversion to a mixed use of office and retail. It contains approximately 207,304 square feet of net rentable area on approximately 20 acres of land. As of December 31, 1997, the property was 42% leased and 31% occupied. A strategy for converting Village Square to non-traditional retail and back office space is being implemented to capitalize on market demand and to generate better lease-up. A lease, for back office space, was signed in January 1998 which brings the leasing percentage to 48%. Town Center Business Park - ------------------------- The Registrant owns a controlling interest in a general partnership which owns and operates Town Center Business Park, totaling approximately 456,700 square feet of net rentable area on approximately 28 acres in Santa Fe Springs, California. Town Center Business Park was developed in two phases. Phase I consists of a three-story office building and six industrial buildings totaling approximately 322,700 rentable square feet. Phase II consists of a two-story office/service building and two industrial buildings containing approximately 134,000 square feet. During 1998, seventeen leases covering 17% of the space in Town Center Business Park are scheduled to expire. Two tenants totaling 7,532 square feet have already renewed. Two tenants totaling 22,831 square feet are vacating at the end of their lease term, however, 21,615 square feet of this space has already been re-leased. Renewal negotiations are currently underway with four tenants totaling 13,437 square feet. The remaining nine tenants, comprising 7% of the space, expire in the third and fourth quarters, and these tenants will be contacted in the first and second quarters to commence renewal discussions. Also, the Registrant completed an office and an industrial lease for two new tenants in early 1998 for 1.6% of space in Town Center Business Park. Town Center Business Park has no single tenant which occupies 10% or more of the rentable square footage. During 1999 and 2000, fifteen and sixteen leases, respectively, are scheduled to expire covering 25% and 17%, respectively, of the space in Town Center Business Park. Historical leasing and occupancy information with respect to Town Center Business Park for the five most recent years is as follows: Leased Occupied ------ -------- 12/31/93 67% 62% 12/31/94 76% 74% 12/31/95 84% 72% 12/31/96 85% 83% 12/31/97 93% 92% Average annualized rental rates for December 1997 were $11.12 per square foot as compared to $10.49 and $10.87 per square foot for December 1996 and 1995, respectively. Oakland Pointe Shopping Center - ------------------------------ The Registrant owns a portion of the Oakland Pointe Shopping Center, a shopping center containing approximately 434,150 square feet located on 49.8 acres in Pontiac, Michigan. The portion owned by the Registrant (the "Oakland Project") contains approximately 213,350 square feet of rentable area on approximately 32.1 acres. As of December 31, 1997, the Oakland Project was approximately 90% leased and 88% occupied. 115 and 117 Flanders Road - ------------------------- The Registrant owns 115 and 117 Flanders Road, two buildings containing approximately 115,175 square feet of net rentable area and located on approximately 26.6 acres in Westborough, Massachusetts. Each building has a two-story office/research and development section and a one-story office/warehouse section. As of December 31, 1997, the buildings were 100% leased and occupied. Three Riverside Drive - --------------------- The Registrant owns Three Riverside Drive, an office/research and development building containing approximately 91,350 square feet of rentable area located on approximately 8.8 acres in Andover, Massachusetts. As of December 31, 1997, the building was 77% leased and occupied. Windmont Apartments - ------------------- The Registrant owns Windmont Apartments, a 178-unit apartment complex which is located on 6.8 acres in DeKalb County, Georgia. As of December 31, 1997, the complex was approximately 92% leased and 90% occupied. Powell Street Plaza - ------------------- The Registrant owns Powell Street Plaza, a shopping center with approximately 169,551 square feet of rentable space, located on approximately 12.9 acres in Emeryville, California. Certain governmental agencies in California, led by the Alameda County Healthcare Services Agency, delivered a letter (the "Request Letter") to the Registrant on June 4, 1993 requiring that it remediate certain soil and ground water contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons existing on the Powell Street property. The contamination is the result of a use of the property prior to its acquisition by the Registrant in 1990. Pursuant to the agreement under which the Registrant acquired Powell Street Plaza, the Registrant has made a demand on the former owner from which it acquired the property (the "Former Owner") to remediate the contamination. The Former Owner has agreed to respond to the governmental agencies. The Former Owner prepared a site characterization and submitted a remediation plan to the Alameda County Healthcare Services Agency, which have been approved. The Registrant is monitoring the process and anticipates that all costs of complying with the Request Letter will be borne by the Former Owner. The Registrant has hired its own consultant to analyze the extent of the pollution. Recent legislation has been adopted that may ease the remediation requirements, but could restrict the use of the land to certain non-residential use. During 1998 and 1999 there are four leases each year that are scheduled to expire covering 8% and 11% of the space, respectively. Two leases expire in 2000 covering 2% of the space in Powell Street Plaza. Powell Street Plaza has two tenants with leases covering 10% or more of the rentable square footage of the property. The first lease, for 27,275 square feet, expires in 2009 and provided annual base rent of $358,666 (13% of total rent) in 1997. The lease contains two consecutive five-year options to renew. The second lease, for 25,025 square feet, expires in 2003 and provided annual base rent of $290,791 (11% of total rent) in 1997. The lease contains four consecutive five-year options to renew. Historical leasing and occupancy information with respect to Powell Street Plaza for the five most recent years is as follows: Leased Occupied ------ -------- 12/31/93 100% 86% 12/31/94 100% 100% 12/31/95 100% 100% 12/31/96 91% 91% 12/31/97 98% 95% Average annualized base rental rates for December 1997 were $17.26 per square foot as compared to $16.54 and $15.67 per square foot for December 1996 and 1995, respectively. During 1996, a 450,000 square foot power center opened about one mile from Powell Street. Tenants at the new center include Home Depot, Sportmart and Toys-R-Us. The only direct competition is with Powell Street Plaza's Copeland Sports. On December 21, 1995, approximately 12,100 square feet of land at Powell Street Plaza was condemned, for purposes of road construction, by the State of California Department of Transportation. Net proceeds to the Registrant were approximately $271,000, after paydown of a portion of the City's special assessment. Loss on the sale included in the consolidated financial statements was approximately $23,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. Westgate Distribution Center - ---------------------------- The Registrant owns Westgate Distribution Center, which consists of three warehouse/distribution buildings totaling approximately 324,200 rentable square feet on 15.6 acres in Corona, California. As of December 31, 1997, the buildings were 86% leased and occupied. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Neither the Registrant nor any of the Registrant's Investments in Properties are subject to any material pending legal proceedings, except for the following lawsuits. In November 1996, the Registrant and the General Partners were named as defendants in two purported class action lawsuits filed in the Chancery Court of Delaware in New Castle County, entitled Bobbitt v. Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P., et al. and Estes v. Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P., et al. The complaints in those actions allege, among other things, that management fees that have been and are paid to the General Partners are excessive and that a standstill agreement with a tender offeror which has had the effect of limiting the number of Units that would be the subject of any tender offer is unlawful. The defendants have moved to dismiss one of the complaints and have not yet been served with the other. The General Partners believe that the allegations in these complaints are without merit and intend to defend the lawsuits vigorously. The tender offer referenced in the lawsuit expired in December 1997 with less than 5% of the Units being tendered. Although the parties have exchanged correspondence there have been no material proceedings in the litigation. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, no matter was submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise. PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. The Units represent the economic rights attributable to limited partnership interests in the Registrant. There is no established public trading market for the Units. The Registrant's Units are listed on certain matching services (the "Matching Programs") currently maintained by various broker-dealers. These Matching Programs are computerized listing systems that put individuals who wish to sell listed securities in contact with persons who wish to buy such securities. Neither the broker-dealers nor the General Partners are required to list the Registrant's Units on the Matching Program. There can be no assurance that any Units listed on the Matching Program will be sold. As of March 1, 1998, the number of Unitholders was approximately 18,400. The Revised Limited Partnership Agreement dated December 1, 1988 by and among Aetna/AREA Corporation, AREA GP Corporation and AREA Depositary Corporation (the "Partnership Agreement") provides for distributions of net cash from operations, if any, to be paid quarterly to Unitholders. Net cash from operations, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, is equal to net income, before depreciation, less any amounts set aside to increase or create reserves. In the last three years, quarterly cash distributions of $.18 per Unit have been paid to Unitholders. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. The following selected financial data of the Registrant have been selected by the General Partners and derived from the consolidated financial statements for the indicated periods, which have been audited by Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public accountants, whose report for the years 1997, 1996 and 1995 is included elsewhere herein. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Registrant's consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" also included elsewhere herein. (Dollars in thousands, except per Unit data) Years Ended December 31, 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 ------------------------------------------------ Revenue $ 29,597 $ 29,030 $ 28,438 $ 26,454 $ 26,389 Operating Income before Impairment of Investment in Real Estate 6,793 5,711 5,002 4,144 4,492 Impairment of Investment in Real Estate - - 4,408 - - Operating Income 6,793 5,711 594 4,144 4,492 Gain (Loss) on Sale of Property - - (23) 355 2,358 Cash and Cash Equivalents 10,883 9,133 8,971 9,373 13,234 Total Assets (Historical Cost Basis) 203,416 205,750 209,334 217,854 225,248 Total Assets (Current Value Basis) 218,719 204,222 199,709 195,916 190,237 Rental Income 28,604 28,242 27,455 25,831 25,782 Interest Income 404 336 367 301 339 Earnings per Weighted Average Unit .53 .44 .04 .35 .54 Cash Distributions per Unit .72 .72 .72 .91 1.92 Net Asset Value per Unit 16.71 15.59 15.24 14.96 14.50 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Registrant has current Reserves of $6.2 million, including approximately $4.8 million retained from cash generated from operations in 1997. During the year ended December 31, 1997, the Partnership expended approximately $3.4 million for capital improvements. At December 31, 1997, the Registrant had approximately $.7 million of outstanding commitments for capital improvements and approximately $5.2 million of projected capital improvements (collectively "Capital Costs") related to existing Investments in Properties. The projected capital improvements consist primarily of estimated tenant improvements and leasing commissions for speculative leasing activity at certain properties, which, based on activity in the marketplace, may or may not materialize. The Registrant expects to fund Capital Costs throughout 1998 from existing Reserves and the retention of a portion of cash generated from operations. The General Partners will continue to review the Reserves quarterly to determine whether cash distributions should be adjusted. If sufficient capital is not available at the time of a funding of Capital Costs, the General Partners will review such Capital Costs and take such steps as they consider appropriate, including decreasing future cash distributions from operations, negotiating a delay or other restructuring of the capital funding requirements related to an Investment in Properties or borrowing money, as provided in the Partnership Agreement, on a short-term basis to pay Capital Costs. Year 2000 Issues Management is evaluating the potential impact of the situation commonly referred to as the "Year 2000" problem. The Year 2000 problem, which is common to most businesses, concerns the inability of computer systems and devices to properly recognize and process date-sensitive information when the year changes to 2000. The Partnership owns real estate assets, and in connection with the operation of such assets, utilizes certain software products and equipment such as accounting, heating ventilation and air conditioning and security systems, which may or may not be Year 2000 compliant. Management has formed teams to identify Year 2000 issues, assess Year 2000 readiness and formulate remediation plans where appropriate. It is expected that the cost of vendor (particularly property management and related services) compliance with Year 2000 problems will be borne primarily by vendors. Although it is not possible at present to give an estimate of the cost of this work to the Partnership, the General Partners do not expect such costs to have a material adverse impact on the Partnership's long term results of operations. Results of Operations 1997 versus 1996 Operating income for the year ended December 31, 1997 increased approximately $1,082,000 from 1996. Revenue increased approximately $567,000 from 1996, resulting primarily from an increase in rental revenue at the majority of the residential and office/industrial properties, partially offset by decreases in rental revenue at the majority of the retail properties. The most significant increases in rental revenue occurred at 115 and 117 Flanders Road and Town Center Business Park, as a result of increased occupancy, and at Summit Village, as a result of an increase in rental rates. The most significant decrease in rental revenue occurred at Village Square, the result of a reduction of leased space. The increase in other income of approximately $137,000 for the year ended December 31,1997 is attributable to the receipt of lease termination fees at 115 and 117 Flanders Road and the receipt of settlement proceeds at Westgate Distribution Center related to faulty roof construction. Property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 1997 increased approximately $375,000 in comparison to 1996. The most significant increases in operating expenses occurred at Village Square, relating primarily to increased parking lot maintenance, and at Town Center Business Park primarily as a result of increased HVAC electric and repair and maintenance expenses. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $448,000 is primarily a result of the write-off of the unamortized cost of the tenant improvements and leasing commissions associated with a tenant that vacated Powell Street Plaza during 1996. The investment portfolio fee decreased approximately $184,000 due to a decrease in the fee percentage for properties held more than ten years, partially offset by an increase in net assets at current value as discussed below. Bad debt expense declined approximately $167,000 in comparison to 1996. Bad debt expense of approximately $448,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997 includes approximately $180,000 related to a tenant in bankruptcy at Powell Street Plaza and approximately $72,000 related to a tenant that had vacated at Town Center Business Park. Net Asset Value per Unit increased to $16.71 at December 31, 1997 from $15.59 at December 31, 1996. The increase in Net Asset Value per Unit is attributable to the increases in the appraised values of certain of the Registrant's properties, primarily, Summit Village, Town Center Business Park, and 115 and 117 Flanders Road. The increase in appraised value of Summit Village is a result of an increase in projected market rents. The increase in appraised value of Town Center Business Park and 115 and 117 Flanders Road is primarily due to improved occupancy and market rent assumptions. These value increases were partially offset by a decrease in the appraised value of Oakland Pointe Shopping Center due to a decrease in anticipated occupancy from the expected departure of three major tenants, and a reduction in the market rent of some space. 1996 versus 1995 Operating income for the year ended December 31, 1996 increased approximately $5,117,000 from 1995 resulting primarily from an impairment loss of approximately $4,408,000 reflected in the 1995 Consolidated Statement of Income. Revenue increased approximately $592,000 from 1995, resulting from an increase in rental revenue at the majority of the residential and office/industrial properties. The most significant increases in rental revenue occurred at Town Center Business Park, as a result of increased occupancy, and at Summit Village, as a result of an increase in rental rates. 1996 versus 1995 (continued) These increases were partially offset by certain decreases in rental revenue, as a result of decreases in occupancy, at 117 Flanders Road, Village Square Shopping Center and Oakland Pointe Shopping Center. The decrease in other income of approximately $164,000 for the year ended December 1996 is attributable to the receipt of lease termination fees at Three Riverside Drive and 117 Flanders Road during the year ended December 31, 1995. Property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 1996 increased approximately $502,000 in comparison to 1995, primarily as a result of increases in operating expenses at certain retail and office and industrial properties. The majority of the increase is related to snow removal expenses due to harsh winter conditions and increased electricity expenses, as a result of vacated tenants who were paying 100% of their electricity expenses at certain office/industrial properties, and higher operating expenses at Oakland Pointe Shopping Center and Powell Street Plaza. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily a result of the write-off of the unamortized cost of the tenant improvements and leasing commissions associated with a tenant that vacated Village Square Shopping Center during the year ended December 31, 1995. The investment portfolio fee increased slightly due to an increase in the current value of net assets as discussed below, offset by a decrease in the fee percentage for properties held more than ten years. Bad debt expenses for the year ended December 31, 1996 were approximately $615,000 due primarily to the write-off of certain tenant receivables and an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts at the retail properties. Net Asset Value per Unit increased to $15.59 at December 31, 1996 from $15.24 at December 31, 1995. The increase in Net Asset Value per Unit is attributable to the increases in the appraised values of certain of the Registrant's properties, primarily Summit Village, Town Center Business Park and Three Riverside Drive. The increase in appraised value of Summit Village is a result of an increase in projected market rents. The increase in appraised value of Town Center Business Park and Three Riverside Drive is primarily due to improved occupancy, from 72% to 83% and from 79% to 92%, respectively. These value increases were partially offset by decreases in the appraised value of certain of the Registrant's properties, primarily Oakland Pointe Shopping Center due to the expected departure of three major tenants and the resulting changes in the discount and exit capitalization rates to reflect the increased risk associated with this property. The Registrant made cash distributions, which were entirely from cash generated from operations, of $.72 per Unit to Unitholders for each of the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. See List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule on page F-1. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None. PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. The Registrant has no officers or directors. Aetna/AREA Corporation and AREA GP Corporation, the General Partners of the Registrant, jointly manage and control the affairs of the Registrant and have general responsibility and authority in all matters affecting its business. Certain officers and directors of AREA GP are now serving (or in the past have served) as officers or directors of entities which act as general partners of a number of real estate limited partnerships, unrelated to the Registrant, which have sought protection under the provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. The partnerships which have filed bankruptcy petitions own real estate which has been adversely affected by the economic conditions in the markets in which the real estate is located and, consequently, the partnerships sought protection of the bankruptcy laws to protect the partnerships' assets from loss through foreclosure. As compared to the Registrant, many of these partnerships had different investment objectives, including the use of leverage. Item 11. Executive Compensation. No compensation was paid by the Registrant to the officers or directors of either of the General Partners. See Item 13 below for a description of the compensation and fees paid to the General Partners and their affiliates by the Registrant. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. As of March 1, 1998, no person was known by the Registrant to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Units of the Registrant. The Registrant has no directors or officers, and as of March 15, 1998, neither of the General Partners of the Registrant owns any Units, though together they own a 1% general partnership interest in the Registrant. As of March 1, 1998, no directors or officers of AREA GP beneficially owned any Units. As of March 1, 1998, no directors of Aetna/AREA owned any Units, and as of such date, officers of Aetna/AREA as a group beneficially owned approximately 232 Units, which constituted less than 1% of the outstanding Units. Aetna Life Insurance Company entered into an Option Purchase Agreement dated June 7, 1996, with the managing member of Allegis Realty Investors LLC by which such managing member is granted the right to purchase the stock of Aetna/AREA for nominal consideration during the twelve-year period following the date of the option. During the period of the option, such managing member is also granted the right to designate the directors of Aetna/AREA regardless of whether the option is exercised. This option has not been exercised to date. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. The General Partners and their affiliates have received or will receive certain types of compensation, fees, or other distributions in connection with the operations of the Registrant. The arrangements for payment of compensation and fees were not determined in arms-length negotiations with the Registrant. The General Partners are entitled to receive an investment portfolio fee based on the net asset value of the Registrant's investments. The fee is payable quarterly from available cash flow and may not exceed 2.5% per annum of net asset value. For the year ended December 31, 1997, Aetna/AREA and AREA GP were entitled to fees of $2,059,243 and $2,643,952, respectively, totaling $4,703,195. During the year ended December 31, 1997, $399,840 was paid to Aetna Life Insurance Company, an affiliate of Aetna/AREA, primarily as reimbursement for insurance expense paid on behalf of the Registrant by Aetna Life Insurance Company to persons not affiliated with the Registrant. Cash distributions paid to the General Partners during the year ended December 31, 1997 aggregated $92,542, which related to operations for the quarters ended December 31, 1996, March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997 and September 30, 1997. PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K. The following documents are filed as part of this report: (a) 1. Financial Statements: See List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule on page F-1. 2. Financial Statement Schedules: See List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule on page F-1. 3. Exhibits: 3.1 Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 3.2 Revised Limited Partnership Agreement of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 3.3 Form of Certificate of Limited Partnership Interest (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 3.4 Form of Distribution Reinvestment Plan Election Card (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 4.1 Revised Depositary Agreement of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 4.2 See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4. 4.3 Distribution Reinvestment Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 4.4 Revised Form of Depositary Receipt of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 4.5 Form of Distribution Reinvestment Plan Administration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 10.1 Revised Escrow Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 10.2 See Exhibits 4.1 and 4.5. 10.3 Custody Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 10.4 Processing Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). 10.5 Amendment to Revised Escrow Agreement, dated March 4, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990). 10.6 Amendment to Custody Agreement, dated March 4, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990). 10.7 Amendment to Processing Agreement, dated March 4, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Form 10- K for the year ended December 31, 1990). 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264). (b) There were no reports on Form 8-K filed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1997. (c) See Exhibit Index contained herein. (d) See List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule included on page F-1. INDEX TO EXHIBITS Exhibit Page - ------- ---- 3.1 Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 3.2 Revised Limited Partnership Agreement of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 3.3 Form of Certificate of Limited Partnership Interest (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 3.4 Form of Distribution Reinvestment Plan Election Card (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 4.1 Revised Depositary Agreement of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 4.2 See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 * 4.3 Distribution Reinvestment Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 4.4 Revised Form of Depositary Receipt of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 4.5 Form of Distribution Reinvestment Plan Administration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 10.1 Revised Escrow Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 10.2 See Exhibits 4.1 and 4.5 * 10.3 Custody Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 10.4 Processing Agreement (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * 10.5 Amendment to Revised Escrow Agreement, dated March 4, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990) * 10.6 Amendment to Custody Agreement, dated March 4, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990) * 10.7 Amendment to Processing Agreement, dated March 4, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990) * 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-2264) * * Incorporated by reference SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 25 day of March 1998. Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. By: Aetna/AREA Corporation, General Partner By: /s/ Daniel R. Leary Daniel R. Leary President By: AREA GP Corporation, General Partner By: /s/ Mark J. Marcucci Mark J. Marcucci President Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on March 25, 1998, by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated. Signature Title /s/ Daniel R. Leary President (Principal Executive Officer) Daniel R. Leary and Director of Aetna/AREA Corporation /s/ Carol M. Kuta Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) Carol M. Kuta and Comptroller of Aetna/AREA Corporation /s/ James W. O'Keefe Chairman and Vice President of James W. O'Keefe Aetna/AREA Corporation /s/ Dean A. Lindquist Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Comptroller Dean A. Lindquist of Aetna/AREA Corporation /s/ Mark J. Marcucci Director and President of Mark J. Marcucci AREA GP Corporation AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule Page ---- Report of Independent Accountants F-2 Report of Hanford /Healy Appraisal Company F-3 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Historical Cost and Current Value) December 31, 1997 and 1996 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Income (Historical Cost) for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital (Deficiency) (Historical Cost) for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 F-6 Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital (Deficiency) (Current Value) for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 F-7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Historical Cost) for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 F-8 Consolidated Current Value Basis Statements of Changes in Excess (Deficiency) of Current Value over Historical Cost for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 F-9 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-10 - F-18 Report of Independent Accountants- Supplementary Information F-19 The following financial statement schedule of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. required by Item 14 (d) is included in this Item 8: Schedule III -- Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation F-20 - F-28 All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted since: (1) the information required is disclosed in the financial statements and notes thereto; (2) the schedules are not required under the related instructions; or (3) the schedules are inapplicable. Report of Independent Accountants To the Partners of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P.: We have audited the consolidated historical cost balance sheets of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. ("the Partnership") as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated historical cost statements of income, partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. We have also audited the supplemental consolidated current value basis balance sheets of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the supplemental consolidated current value basis statements of partners' capital and changes in the excess of current value over historical cost for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the historical cost financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. at December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. As described in Note 3, during 1996, the Partnership adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long- Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." As described in Note 2, the supplemental consolidated current value financial statements have been prepared by management to present relevant financial information that is not provided by the consolidated historical cost financial statements and are not intended to be a presentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting principals. In addition, the supplemental consolidated current value financial statements do not purport to present the net realizable, liquidation, or market value of the Partnership as a whole. Furthermore, amounts ultimately realized by the Partnership from the disposal of properties may vary significantly from the current values presented. In our opinion, the supplemental consolidated current value financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth in them on the basis of accounting described in Note 2. COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. Hartford, Connecticut February 18, 1998 Hanford/Healy Appraisal Company February 11, 1998 Coopers & Lybrand and The Unitholders of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P.: Re: Cross Pointe Center, Centerville, OH Windmont Apartments, DeKalb Co., GA Powell Street Plaza, Emeryville, CA Lincoln Marina Bay, Richmond, CA Village Square Shopping Center, Hazelwood, MO Andover Research Park, Andover, MA Metrowest Business Park I, Westborough, MA Metrowest Business Park II, Westborough, MA Gateway Square, Hinsdale, IL Oakland Pointe Shopping Center, Pontiac, MI Summit Village, Rosslyn, VA Westgate Distribution Center, Corona, CA Town Center Business Park, Santa Fee Springs, CA Lincoln Square, Arlington Heights, IL We have estimated the market value of certain real property (the "Properties") owned by Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. (the "Partnership") as of December 31, 1997. The properties consist of the 14 Properties identified above. Full annual valuation reports and three quarterly update reports were performed for each of the properties during 1997. In accordance with an on-going schedule, the dates of the full annual valuation varied from property to property during the course of the year. The quarterly valuations, which were more limited in scope, were based on and subject to the most recent full valuation. Each property was inspected at least once during the course of the assignment. The reports were prepared in accordance with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute. The aggregate market value estimate reported below is subject to the detailed assumptions and limiting conditions with respect to each property considered, or incorporated by reference, in the Appraisal with respect to such Property. The aggregate market value estimate is the sum of the individual property market values and does not reflect any premium or discount for the properties as a whole. In our opinion, the aggregate market value of the Properties, as of December 31, 1996 was: TWO HUNDRED SIX MILLION NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS $206,900,000 Hanford/Healy Appraisal Company was not employed to provide legal analysis and assumes no responsibility for any matters of a legal nature. Hanford/Healy Appraisal Company was also not employed to perform engineering inspections and assumes no responsibility for structural and mechanical, electrical or any other construction matters, or the ability of the underlying properties to withstand climatic or seismic disruptions. Neither Hanford/Healy Appraisal Company, its officers, or any staff employed on the valuations have any known present or contemplated future interest in the Properties. We have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter or the parties involved. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the facts upon which the analyses and conclusions are based are true and correct. Hanford/Healy Appraisal Company's fee for the assignment was in no way contingent upon the values reported. HANFORD/HEALY APPRAISAL COMPANY AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. Consolidated Balance Sheets (Historical Cost and Current Value) As of December 31, 1997 and 1996 (in thousands) 1997 1996 -------------------- -------------------- Current Current Value Historical Value Historical (Note 2) Cost (Note 2) Cost -------------------- -------------------- Assets Investments in real estate: Properties $206,777 $243,062 $193,565 $239,889 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization - (54,496) - (47,772) -------------------- -------------------- Total investments in real estate 206,777 188,566 193,565 192,117 Cash and cash equivalents 10,883 10,883 9,133 9,133 Rent and other receivables 1,046 3,954 1,511 4,487 Other 13 13 13 13 -------------------- -------------------- Total assets $218,719 $203,416 $204,222 $205,750 -------------------- -------------------- Liabilities and Partners' Capital Liabilities: Investment portfolio fee payable to related parties $ 1,168 $ 1,168 $ 1,195 $ 1,195 Accounts payable and accrued expenses 463 463 496 496 Accrued property taxes 782 782 766 766 Security deposits 979 979 934 934 Unearned income 315 315 189 189 -------------------- -------------------- Total liabilities 3,707 3,707 3,580 3,580 -------------------- -------------------- Commitments (Note 14) Partners' capital (deficiency): General Partners 86 (67) (58) (43) Limited Partners 214,926 199,776 200,700 202,213 -------------------- -------------------- Total partners' capital 215,012 199,709 200,642 202,170 -------------------- -------------------- Total liabilities and partners' capital $218,719 $203,416 $204,222 $205,750 -------------------- -------------------- AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. Consolidated Statements of Income (Historical Cost) For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (in thousands, except units and per unit amounts) 1997 1996 1995 --------- --------- --------- Revenue: Rental $ 28,604 $ 28,242 $ 27,455 Interest 404 336 367 Other income 589 452 616 --------- --------- --------- 29,597 29,030 28,438 --------- --------- --------- Expenses: Property operating 10,056 9,681 9,179 Depreciation and amortization 6,921 7,369 8,004 Investment portfolio fee - related parties 4,703 4,887 4,814 General and administrative 676 767 725 Bad debt 448 615 714 --------- --------- --------- 22,804 23,319 23,436 --------- --------- --------- Impairment of investment in real estate - - (4,408) --------- --------- --------- Operating income 6,793 5,711 594 Loss on sale of property - - (23) --------- --------- --------- Net income $ 6,793 $ 5,711 $ 571 --------- --------- --------- Net income allocated: To the General Partners $ 68 $ 57 $ 6 To the Limited Partners 6,725 5,654 565 --------- --------- --------- $ 6,793 $ 5,711 $ 571 --------- --------- --------- Weighted average number of limited partnership units outstanding 12,724,547 12,724,547 12,724,547 ---------- ---------- ---------- Earnings per limited partnership unit $ .53 $ .44 $ .04 ---------- ---------- ---------- AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital (Deficiency) (Historical Cost) For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (in thousands) General Limited Partners Partners Total ------------------------------------ Balance at January 1, 1995 $ 79 $214,318 $214,397 Capital contributions 92 - 92 Net income 6 565 571 Cash distributions (92) (9,162) (9,254) ------------------------------------ Balance at December 31, 1995 85 205,721 205,806 Net income 57 5,654 5,711 Cash distributions (185) (9,162) (9,347) ------------------------------------ Balance at December 31, 1996 (43) 202,213 202,170 Net income 68 6,725 6,793 Cash distributions (92) (9,162) (9,254) ------------------------------------ Balance at December 31, 1997 $ (67) $199,776 $199,709 ------------------------------------ AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital (Deficiency) (Current Value) For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (in thousands) General Limited Partners Partners Total ------------------------------------- Balance at January 1, 1995 $ (140) $192,599 $192,459 Capital contributions 92 - 92 Net income 6 565 571 Decrease in deficiency of current value over historical cost 123 12,190 12,313 Cash distributions (92) (9,162) (9,254) ------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1995 (11) 196,192 196,181 Net income 57 5,654 5,711 Decrease in deficiency of current value over historical cost 81 8,016 8,097 Cash distributions (185) (9,162) (9,347) ------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1996 (58) 200,700 200,642 Net income 68 6,725 6,793 Increase in excess of current value over historical cost 168 16,663 16,831 Cash distributions (92) (9,162) (9,254) ------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 $ 86 $214,926 $215,012 ------------------------------------- AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Historical Cost) For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (in thousands) 1997 1996 1995 Cash flows from operating activities: --------------------------- Net income $ 6,793 $ 5,711 $ 571 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 6,921 7,369 8,004 Impairment of investment in real estate - - 4,408 Loss on sale of property - - 23 Bad debt expense 448 615 714 Deferred (accrued) rental income 68 (118) (5) Increase (decrease) in cash arising from changes in operating assets and liabilities: Rent and other receivables 17 (816) (763) Investment portfolio fee payable to related parties (27) (17) 24 Accounts payable and accrued expenses 1 10 (115) Accrued property taxes 16 (49) 60 Security deposits 45 110 10 Unearned income 126 (36) 92 --------------------------- Net cash provided by operating activities 14,408 12,779 13,023 --------------------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Investments in real estate (3,404) (3,270) (4,534) Proceeds from sale of property - - 271 --------------------------- Net cash used in investing activities (3,404) (3,270) (4,263) --------------------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Cash distributions (9,254) (9,347) (9,254) Partners' capital contributions - - 92 --------------------------- Net cash used in financing activities (9,254) (9,347) (9,162) --------------------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,750 162 (402) --------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 9,133 8,971 9,373 --------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $10,883 $ 9,133 $ 8,971 --------------------------- AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. Consolidated Current Value Basis Statements of Changes in Excess (Deficiency) of Current Value Over Historical Cost For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (in thousands) Deficiency of current value over historical cost at January 1, 1995 $(21,938) Current value increase in properties 7,910 Write-down of property for permanent impairment 4,408 Increase in accrued rent (5) -------- 12,313 -------- Deficiency of current value over historical cost at December 31, 1995 (9,625) Current value increase in properties 8,215 Increase in accrued rent (118) -------- 8,097 -------- Deficiency of current value over historical cost at December 31, 1996 (1,528) Current value increase in properties 16,763 Decrease in accrued rent 68 -------- 16,831 -------- Excess of current value over historical cost at December 31, 1997 $ 15,303 -------- AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. ORGANIZATION Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. ("the Partnership") was organized on September 11, 1986 as a limited partnership under the laws of the State of Delaware pursuant to a Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"), as amended and restated. The Partnership was formed for the purpose of making acquisitions in and operating certain types of residential and commercial real estate, either directly or through joint venture arrangements and, subject to certain limitations, making participating investments, construction loans and conventional mortgage loans. The General Partners of the Partnership are Aetna/AREA Corporation ("Aetna/AREA"), an affiliate of Aetna Life Insurance Company, and AREA GP Corporation ("AREA GP"), an affiliate of Lehman Brothers Inc. The Partnership will continue until December 31, 2015 unless sooner terminated by law or in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement. 2. CURRENT VALUE BASIS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Current Value Reporting The consolidated current value basis financial statements are presented to provide supplementary information about the Partnership's financial position and changes in partners' capital which is not provided by the historical cost basis financial statements. The Partnership's investments in real estate are subject to changes in value and, therefore, their current values differ from their historical cost basis net book values determined in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Management believes that reporting the financial position on a current value basis is a more realistic basis for reporting the Partnership's activities because of the changing economic conditions affecting the real estate market. As more fully explained below, estimates of the current values of the Partnership's assets and liabilities are determined by management. The estimates of current values of the Partnership's investments in real estate are based upon independent appraisals of the underlying real estate using generally accepted valuation techniques. Such estimates of current value represent the value of real estate assets held as investments for purposes of obtaining the benefit of appreciation and operating cash flows. The estimates do not necessarily represent the realizable sales values of these assets at the date of valuation. Additionally, partners' capital on a current value basis is not intended to represent the liquidation value of the Partnership or the market value of its net assets taken as a whole. Bases of Valuation The following describes the bases of management's estimates of current values: * The current values of the Partnership's operating properties are determined by independent appraisers. Independent appraisals of each property are performed at the date of purchase and on a quarterly basis thereafter. The value of future cash payments from joint venture partners and additional capital costs, if any, are determined by management to the extent they have not been considered in the independent appraisals. * All other assets and liabilities are carried in the current value basis balance sheets at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Accrued rent related to scheduled rent increases and tenant concessions, included in rent and other receivables on the historical cost basis balance sheets, is deemed to have a net realizable value of zero on a current value basis. * The aggregate difference between the current value basis and historical cost basis of the Partnership's assets and liabilities is reflected in the partners' capital accounts in the current value basis balance sheets. The components of this difference at December 31, 1997 and 1996 are as follows: (in thousands) 1997 1996 ---------------------------------------------------------- Properties $18,211 $1,448 Accrued rent (2,908) (2,976) Excess (deficiency) of current value over historical cost $15,303 $(1,528) ---------------------------------------------------------- 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Financial Statements The Partnership has a controlling interest in each of its joint venture investments and, therefore, has consolidated the accounts of such joint ventures in the financial statements. The consolidated financial statements for 1997, 1996 and 1995 include the accounts of the Partnership and its joint ventures Lincoln Marina Bay and Town Center Associates. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Properties The Partnership regularly evaluates the carrying value of its properties. In 1995 the Partnership adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 (FAS 121), Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. FAS 121 also addresses the accounting for long-lived assets that are expected to be disposed of. During the fourth quarter of 1995, a permanent impairment write-down of one investment property to bring the property's carrying value to its estimated fair value resulted in a reduction of operating income of approximately $4,408,000, and is reflected in the 1995 Consolidated Statement of Income. At December 31, 1995 the property had a high vacancy rate with no new tenant prospects in the near future thus causing the estimated undiscounted cash flows to be less than the asset's carrying value. The estimated fair value represents the property's current value, as discussed in Note 2. There were no such write-downs required in 1997 or 1996. Investments in properties, which the Partnership has the intent to hold for the production of income, are carried at depreciated cost, which includes the initial purchase price of the property, plus closing costs, legal fees, and other miscellaneous acquisition costs, net of impairment write-downs. Properties to be disposed of are carried at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Leases are accounted for under the operating method where rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis. Lease termination fees are included in income in the period in which the fee is received. Expenses including advertising, maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant betterments and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective depreciable properties and improvements, ranging from 5 to 40 years for land improvements; 10 to 50 years for building and improvements; and 3 to 10 years for personal property, furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasing commissions and tenant improvements are amortized over the life of the respective leases or the lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Properties to be disposed of are not depreciated. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash Equivalents For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Partnership considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Included in cash and cash equivalents are restricted security deposits of $77,041 and $85,844 at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Also, included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 1997 and 1996 was $8,742,070 and $6,080,343, respectively, held in a mutual fund utilizing investments such as commercial paper, certificates of deposit and government obligations, which are carried at market value. The cost of cash equivalents approximates fair value at December 31, 1997 and 1996. At December 31, 1997 and 1996, approximately $852,000 and $885,000, respectively, of the bank balances of the Partnership's checking and money market accounts were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") while approximately $1,612,000 and $2,087,000, respectively, were uninsured. Included in the uninsured bank balances was approximately $832,000 and $1,522,000 held at one major financial institution at December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996, respectively. The remainder of the uninsured balances were held in multiple banks, minimizing the risk of an isolated bank failure. Income Taxes No provision for federal or state income taxes has been made in the financial statements since income, losses and tax credits are generally passed through to the individual partners. Earnings Per Limited Partnership Unit Earnings per unit is based upon net income allocated to the Limited Partners and their weighted average number of units outstanding during the year. Reclassifications Certain 1995 consolidated financial statement items have been reclassified to conform to the 1996 presentation. 4. SALE OF INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE On December 21, 1995 approximately 12,100 square feet of land at Powell Street Plaza was condemned, for the purpose of road construction, by the State of California Department of Transportation. Net proceeds to the Partnership were approximately $271,000. Loss on the sale included in these consolidated financial statements was approximately $23,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. 5. RENT AND OTHER RECEIVABLES Rent and other receivables at December 31, 1997 and 1996 are summarized as follows: 1997 1996 --------------------------------------------- Current Historical Current Historical Value Cost Value Cost --------------------------------------------- Rent and reimbursements receivable $1,507,848 $1,507,848 $1,739,095 $1,739,095 Prepaids and other receivables 269,960 269,960 275,605 275,605 Accrued rent - 2,907,877 - 2,975,752 --------------------------------------------- 1,777,808 4,685,685 2,014,700 4,990,452 Less: allowance for doubtful accounts (731,856 (731,856) (503,323) (503,323) --------------------------------------------- Total rent and other receivables $1,045,952 $3,953,829 $1,511,377 $4,487,129 --------------------------------------------- 6. PARTNERSHIP ALLOCATIONS Generally, net income and losses for any fiscal year and gains and losses from sales are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. The Partnership Agreement provides that net cash from operations, as defined therein, and distributable proceeds from sale of investments (other than from the sale of investments pursuant to the liquidation of the Partnership) generally will be distributed, on a quarterly basis, 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. Distributable proceeds from the sale of investments in liquidation of the Partnership will be distributed in accordance with the partners' capital accounts after all allocations of income and loss. The Partnership Agreement also provides for potentially substantial compensation to be paid to the General Partners in the event the Limited Partners elect to remove the General Partners. 7. JOINT VENTURES The Partnership was a general partner in two consolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995. The joint venture agreements in existence as of December 31, 1997 provide the Partnership with priority cash payments from operations of the joint ventures ranging from 9% to 13% per annum on all funds contributed by the Partnership to the extent sufficient cash flows are generated by the underlying properties. Any cash flows in excess of these payments to the Partnership will be distributed to the Partnership and its joint venture partners in accordance with their joint venture interests. The Partnership's interests in its joint ventures range from 50% to 80%. 8. CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS/DISTRIBUTIONS The Partnership initially offered up to $300,000,000 of depositary partnership units representing units of limited partnership interests and an additional $30,000,000 of units pursuant to the Partnership's Distribution Reinvestment Plan ("DRIP"). Pursuant to such Plan, Unitholders were entitled to elect to have their Partnership distributions reinvested in new units. Effective January 1, 1991, the Partnership suspended its initial offering of $300,000,000 of units. In March 1992, the Partnership terminated the offering and suspended sales of units pursuant to the DRIP. During 1993, the Partnership received a favorable response to a no-action request submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its ability to continue to sell units pursuant to the DRIP without registration of such units under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As of December 31, 1997, the Partnership had not reopened sales of units pursuant to the DRIP. No additional units were issued since 1991. Information related to Unitholders' distributions for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 is as follows: Cash Distributions ------------------ Paid Per Unit ----------------------------------- 1997 $9,161,674 $ .72 1996 9,161,674 .72 1995 9,161,674 .72 ----------------------------------- Cash distributions paid to the General Partners during the year ended December 31, 1997 aggregated $92,542 which related to operations for the quarters ended December 31, 1996, March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997 and September 30, 1997. Cash distributions paid to the General Partners during the year ended December 31, 1996 aggregated $185,084, of which $92,542 related to operations for the quarters ended December 31, 1995, March 31, 1996, June 30, 1996 and September 30, 1996, and $92,542 was for distributions that were withheld by the Partnership during 1995 and became distributable within the provisions of the Partnership's Revised Limited Partnership Agreement. 9. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES Investment Portfolio Fee The General Partners are entitled to receive an investment portfolio fee based on the net asset value of the Partnership's investments. As specified in the Partnership Agreement, the fee is determined by applying various percentages to the portion of net asset value attributable to committed and uncommitted funds available for investment. The fee is payable quarterly from available cash flow and may not exceed 2.5% per annum of net asset value. The applicable percentage, for the purpose of calculating this fee, declines to 2% per annum for Investments in Properties held by the Partnership more than 10 years but less than 15 years, and to 1.75% per annum for Investments in Properties held more than 15 years. For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, Aetna/AREA and AREA GP were entitled to fees as follows: Aetna/AREA AREA GP --------------------------------------------- 1997 $2,059,243 $2,643,952 1996 1,972,562 2,914,167 1995 1,925,626 2,888,440 --------------------------------------------- Other The General Partners are entitled to reimbursement of expenses paid on behalf of the Partnership incurred in connection with the investments and operation of the Partnership. Reimbursable expenses of $399,840, $411,675 and $403,479, which consist primarily of insurance expense paid to a third party, were reimbursed during 1997, 1996 and 1995 respectively, to an affiliate of Aetna/AREA. 10. LEASE AGREEMENTS At December 31, 1997, the Partnership's principal assets subject to lease agreements consisted of shopping centers, apartment complexes, business parks and industrial parks. Apartment leases generally have terms of 6 to 12 months and provide for a fixed minimum rent. Leases with shopping center, industrial park and business park tenants generally range in term from 1 to 10 years and provide for fixed minimum rent and reimbursement of their proportionate share of operating expenses. Included in rental revenue are $3,803,939, $3,956,228 and $4,109,685 primarily consisting of expense reimbursements for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. In addition, various leases with shopping center tenants provide for additional rent based upon percentages of tenants' sales volume. Percentage rent included in rental revenue is $329,730, $458,715 and $426,272 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The following table is a schedule of minimum future rents to be received under noncancelable operating leases: Year ending December 31, ----------------------- 1998 $19,160,651 1999 13,367,101 2000 11,269,417 2001 9,283,555 2002 7,596,910 Thereafter 16,516,607 ----------------------- Total $77,194,241 ----------------------- 11. NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT Prior to the termination of the Offering and the Remarketing Opportunity and the suspension of the DRIP in 1992, units offered to new Unitholders or issued pursuant to the DRIP were purchased at Net Asset Value per unit as defined in the Partnership Agreement. As discussed in Note 8, the Partnership had not reopened sales of units pursuant to the DRIP as of December 31, 1997. The Net Asset Value per unit calculated in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, is summarized as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 as follows: 1997 1996 ------------ ------------ Limited Partners' capital - current value basis $214,925,972 $200,700,247 Cash to be distributed to Limited Partners (2,290,418) (2,290,418) ------------ ------------ $212,635,554 $198,409,829 ------------ ------------- Units outstanding 12,724,547 12,724,547 ------------ ------------- Net Asset Value per unit $ 16.71 $ 15.59 ------------ ------------- 12. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes and advertising costs included in property operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 are as follows: 1997 1996 1995 ---------------------------------- Maintenance and repairs $1,261,142 $1,085,405 $ 983,635 Real estate taxes 3,010,819 2,898,371 2,990,923 Advertising costs 374,395 296,932 255,119 ---------------------------------- 13. RECONCILIATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND TAX INFORMATION The following is a reconciliation of net income for financial statement purposes to net income for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995: 1997 1996 1995 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income per financial statements $6,792,869 $5,710,699 $ 570,340 Joint venture net income for tax purposes in excess of (less than) joint venture net income per financial statements 374,786 (38,240) 298,224 Depreciation deducted for tax purposes less than depreciation expense per financial statements 681,231 673,968 1,591,245 Permanent impairment not deductible for tax purposes - - 4,407,851 Rental income related to accrued rent on wholly owned properties 109,467 130,895 109,766 Bad debt expense deducted per financial statements in excess of (less than) bad debt expense deducted for tax purposes 131,291 (415,238) 431,230 Other 20,597 (22,829) (58,719) ---------- ---------- ---------- Taxable net income $8,110,241 $6,039,255 $7,349,937 ---------- ---------- ---------- The following is a reconciliation of partners' capital (historical cost) for financial statement purposes to partners' capital for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995: 1997 1996 1995 ------------ ------------ ------------ Partners' capital per financial statements $199,708,868 $202,170,215 $205,806,275 Adjustment for cumulative difference between tax basis net income and net income per financial statements 12,492,589 11,175,217 10,846,661 ------------ ------------ ------------ Partners' capital per tax return $212,201,457 $213,345,432 $216,652,936 ------------ ------------ ------------ 14. COMMITMENTS As of December 31, 1997, the Partnership had outstanding commitments of approximately $.7 million relating to previously acquired investments. Of this amount, $.5 million relates to the Partnership's commitment to fund additional tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and other capital projects at certain retail properties, and $.2 million relates to the Partnership's commitment to fund additional tenant and building improvements at Town Center Business Park. 15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Capital Contributions/Distributions In February 1998, the Partnership declared cash distributions aggregating $2,313,554 ($.18 per Unit) pertaining to the period from October 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997, which was distributed on or about February 13, 1998. 16. LITIGATION In November 1996, the Partnership and the General Partners were named as defendants in two purported class action lawsuits filed in the Chancery Court of Delaware in New Castle County, entitled Bobbitt v. Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P., et al. and Estes v. Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P., et al. The complaints in those actions claim, among other things, that management fees that have been and are paid to the General Partners are excessive and that a standstill agreement with a tender offeror which has had the effect of limiting the number of units that would be the subject of any tender offer is unlawful. The defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint that has been served upon it. The General Partners believe that the allegations in these complaints are without merit and intend to defend the lawsuits vigorously. The tender offer referenced in the lawsuit expired in December 1997 with less than 5% of the units being tendered. Although the parties have exchanged correspondence there have been no material proceedings in the litigation. REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Unitholders of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Aetna Real Estate Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which financial statements are included herein, we have also audited the related financial statement schedule listed in the index on page F-1 herein. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be included therein. /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P Hartford, Connecticut February 18, 1998
AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES L.P. Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation As of December 31, 1997 Costs Capitalized Sub- Gross Amount at which Initial Cost sequent to Acquisition Carried at End ofYear ------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- Building Building Building Encum- and and and Description brances Land Improvements Land Improvements Land Improvements Total (a) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Partnership Owned: Cross Pointe $ - $3,300,000 $12,200,000 $ 16,751 $7,266,116 $3,316,751 $19,466,116 $22,782,867 Shopping Center Centerville, OH Gateway Square - 1,516,679 5,377,320 799 789,066 1,517,478 6,166,386 7,683,864 Shopping Center Hinsdale, IL Lincoln Square - 1,859,283 11,102,944 1,660 657,945 1,860,943 11,760,899 13,621,832 Apartment Complex Arlington Hts., IL Oakland Pointe - 3,412,062 16,981,319 7,112 2,592,977 3,419,174 19,574,296 22,993,470 Shopping Center Pontiac, MI Summit Village - 5,395,408 30,154,302 116,350 1,778,191 5,511,758 31,932,493 37,444,251 Apartment Complex Rosslyn, VA Partnership Owned (Cont'd): Three Riverside - 1,722,156 7,389,779 (22,892) 1,517,887 1,699,264 8,907,666 10,606,930 Riverside Drive Office/R&D Bldg. Andover, MA Village Square (b) - 2,710,355 4,103,802 285,346 (1,552,163) 2,995,701 2,551,639 5,547,340 Shopping Center Hazelwood, MO Windmont Apartments - 1,429,226 6,093,017 28,430 537,754 1,457,656 6,630,771 8,088,427 Apartment Complex Atlanta, GA 115 & 117 - 2,369,342 8,947,868 7,016 1,449,455 2,376,358 10,397,323 12,773,681 Flanders Road R&D Warehouse Bldgs. Westborough, MA Powell Street Plaza (c) - 9,196,813 20,167,160 (68,973) 2,652,808 9,127,840 22,819,968 31,947,808 Shopping Center Emeryville, CA Partnership Owned (Cont'd): Westgate - 3,916,801 6,047,987 18,474 4,129,992 3,935,275 10,177,979 14,113,254 Distribution Center (d) Industrial Park Corona, CA Consolidated Ventures: Marina Bay - 1,777,110 5,212,740 166,987 3,886,444 1,944,097 9,099,184 11,043,281 Industrial Park Richmond, CA Town Center - 10,880,641 19,198,867 94,939 14,240,044 10,975,580 33,438,911 44,414,491 Business Park Santa Fe Springs, CA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 49,485,876 152,977,105 651,999 39,946,516 50,137,875 192,923,621 243,061,496(d) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes to schedule III
AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES L.P. Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation As of December 31, 1997 Life on which Depreciation in Latest Income Accumulated Date of Date Statement Description Depreciation(a) Construction Acquired is Computed - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partnership Owned: Cross Pointe $ 3,650,940 1985 10/3/86 40 years Shopping Center Centerville, OH Gateway Square 2,053,512 1986 11/21/86 33 years Shopping Center Hinsdale,IL Lincoln Square 4,421,319 1986 11/14/86 33 years Apartment Complex Arlington Hts., IL Oakland Pointe 7,447,459 1987 1/26/88 33 years Shopping Center Pontiac, MI Summit Village 8,662,407 1987/1989 6/09/87 and 40 years Apartment Complex 8/31/89 Rosslyn, VA Three Riverside Drive 3,035,373 1986 2/8/88 33 years Office/R&D Bldg. Andover, MA Village Square (b) 442,255 1961/1988 6/24/87 33 years Shopping Center Hazelwood, MO Windmont Apartments 2,001,002 1989 7/18/89 33 years Apartment Complex Atlanta, GA 115 & 117 Flanders 3,203,133 1986/1988 2/8/88 33 years Road and R&D Warehouse Bldgs. 8/31/89 Westborough, MA Powell Street Plaza 5,675,782 1988 2/16/90 33 years Shopping Center Emeryville, CA Westgate Distribution 2,301,486 1989 2/22/90 50 years Center Industrial Park Corona,CA Consolidated Ventures: Marina Bay 2,845,753 1962/1987 6/30/87 50 years Industrial Park Richmond, CA Town Center 8,755,171 1982 12/18/87 33 years Business Park Santa Fe Springs, CA ----------- $54,495,592 (d) ----------- AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, L.P. (a) Reconciliation of the carrying amount of real estate investments and accumulated depreciation for the years ended Decenber 31, 1997, 1996 and 1994 is as follows: 1997 1996 1995 -------------------------------------------- Balance of real estate investments at beginning of year $239,888,792 $237,333,658 $241,332,804 Additions during year: Improvements and additions 3,369,864 3,304,120 4,532,853 Deductions during year: Cost of real estate sold (c) - - (293,615) Impairment (b) - - (4,407,851) New basis adjustment (b) - - (2,609,207) Other (1) (197,160) (748,986) (1,221,326) -------------------------------------------- Balance of real estate investments at close of year $243,061,496 $239,888,792 $237,333,658 -------------------------------------------- Balance of accumulated deprec- iation at beginning of year $47,771,997 $41,152,009 $36,978,911 Depreciation expense 6,920755 7,368,974 8,003,631 Accumulated depreciation of real estate sold - - - New basis adjustment (b) - - (2,609,207) Other (1) (197,160) (748,986) (1,221,326) -------------------------------------------- Balance of accumulated depreciation at close of year $54,495,592 $47,771,997 $41,152,009 -------------------------------------------- (1) Write-off of tenant improvements and leasing commissions for vacated tenants. (b) In 1995, a property was written down by $4,407,851 for permanent impairment. Accumulated depreciation and amortization of $2,609,207 at the time of the permanent impairment has been adjusted against cost to conform to the 1996 presentation. (c) In 1995, approximately 12,100 square feet of land was condemned at Powell Street Plaza for the purpose of road construction. The initial cost of land was reduced by $293,615. (d) For Federal income tax purposes, the aggregate cost of land, buildings and improvements is $246,807,834. The amount of accumulated depreciation on real property for Federal income tax purposes is $52,619,055.
EX-27 2 AETNA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR 1997 FORM 10-K
5 YEAR DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1997 10,883,000 000 4,686,000 732,000 000 000 243,062,000 54,496,000 203,416,000 000 000 000 000 000 199,709,000 203,416,000 28,604,000 29,597,000 000 000 22,804,000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 6,793,000 0.53 000
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----