XML 35 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Feb. 29, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
a. Commitments
The Company has various commitments under the following types of material contracts: (i) operating leases; (ii) radio syndicated programming; (iii) employment agreements and (iv) other contracts with annual commitments (mostly contractual services for audience measurement information) at February 29, 2016 as follows:
 
Year ending
February 28 (29),
Operating
Leases
 
Syndicated
Programming
 
Employment
Agreements
 
Other
Contracts
 
Total
2017
$
8,745

 
$
272

 
$
15,306

 
$
11,490

 
$
35,813

2018
8,199

 
148

 
6,087

 
10,668

 
25,102

2019
8,150

 

 
3,095

 
9,740

 
20,985

2020
7,993

 

 
282

 
3,043

 
11,318

2021
7,864

 

 
37

 
90

 
7,991

Thereafter
14,991

 

 

 
150

 
15,141

Total
$
55,942

 
$
420

 
$
24,807

 
$
35,181

 
$
116,350


Emmis leases certain office space, tower space, equipment and automobiles under operating leases expiring at various dates through July 2027. Some of the lease agreements contain renewal options and annual rental escalation clauses, as well as provisions for payment of utilities and maintenance costs. The Company recognizes escalated rents on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement. Rental expense during the years ended February 2014, 2015 and 2016 was approximately $8.2 million, $9.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively. The Company recognized approximately $1.0 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million of sublease income as a reduction of rent expense for the years ended February 2014, 2015, and 2016 respectively. Total minimum sublease rentals to be received in the future under noncancelable subleases as of February 29, 2016 were as follows:
 
Year ending
February 28 (29),
Noncancelable
Sublease rentals
2017
$
319

2018
258

2019
337

2020
317

2021
359

Total
$
1,590


b. Litigation
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management of the Company, there are no legal proceedings pending against the Company likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Emmis and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed April 16, 2012 by certain holders of Preferred Stock (the “Lock-Up Group”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana entitled Corre Opportunities Fund, LP, et al. v. Emmis Communications Corporation, et al. The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that Emmis and the other defendants violated various provisions of the federal securities laws and breached fiduciary duties in connection with Emmis’ entry into total return swap agreements and voting agreements with certain holders of Emmis Preferred Stock, as well as by issuing shares of Preferred Stock to Emmis’ 2012 Retention Plan and Trust (the “Trust”) and entering into a voting agreement with the trustee of the Trust. The plaintiffs also alleged that Emmis violated certain provisions of Indiana corporate law by directing the voting of the shares of Preferred Stock subject to the total return swap agreements (the “Swap Shares”) and the shares of Preferred Stock held by the Trust (the “Trust Shares”) in favor of certain amendments to Emmis’ Articles of Incorporation.
Emmis filed an answer denying the material allegations of the complaint, and filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment that Emmis could legally direct the voting of the Swap Shares and the Trust Shares in favor of the proposed amendments.
On August 31, 2012, the U.S. District Court denied the plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs subsequently filed an amended complaint seeking monetary damages and dismissing all claims against the individual officer and director defendants. On February 28, 2014, the U.S. District Court issued a ruling in favor of Emmis on all counts. In March 2014, the Plaintiffs filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit an appeal of the U.S. District Court's decision. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard oral arguments in this case on December 5, 2014, and on July 2, 2015, unanimously affirmed the U.S. District Court's ruling.
On December 4, 2015, Emmis entered into a settlement agreement with the Lock-Up Group to settle any and all remaining issues with respect to the Lawsuit described above. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, (i) the Company withdrew its bill of costs with respect to certain reimbursable expenses in the Lawsuit; (ii) the Company agreed to submit to a vote of its shareholders, and the Lock-Up Group and Jeffrey H. Smulyan agreed to vote in favor of, an amendment to Exhibit A to the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Revisions”) to amend the terms of the Company’s Series A Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) to (A) change the voluntary conversion ratio to permit holders of Preferred Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock into Class A common stock at a ratio of 2.80 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock for each share of Preferred Stock, and (B) provide that all shares of Preferred Stock shall automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock at a ratio of 2.80 shares of Class A common stock for each share of Preferred Stock on the fifth business day after the delisting of the Preferred Stock by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC ("Nasdaq"); and (iii) both the Company and the Lock-Up Group released each other from claims related to the lawsuit. The Revisions were approved at a special meeting of shareholders on February 17, 2016. Additionally, the Preferred Stock was delisted by Nasdaq on March 28, 2016, and pursuant to the Revisions, all outstanding Preferred Stock was automatically converted to Class A common stock on April 4, 2016. The value associated with the increase to the conversion ratio was accounted for upon the effective date of the Revisions and resulted in a decrease of approximately $0.2 million to earnings available to common shareholders.
On July 7, 2014, individuals who had been seeking to overturn the FCC’s approval of the transfer of the broadcast licenses for WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM from entities associated with Inner City Broadcasting to YMF (the entities that subsequently sold the two stations to Emmis) filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit a Notice of Appeal of the FCC’s approval of the transfer. The District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the case, but the individuals may still appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Additionally, in March 2015, an individual filed a lawsuit in the Federal District Court of New York challenging the transfer of the assets of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM from Inner City to YMF, and claimed that Emmis had exerted undue influence in securing the FCC's consent to the transfer of the FCC licenses of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM from YMF to Emmis. An amended complaint was filed in February 2016. Based upon the facts alleged in the cases and the extensive precedent of courts not overturning FCC approvals of transfers of broadcast licenses except in exceedingly rare circumstances, Emmis believes the claims presented lack merit.