XML 14 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Income Taxes 
Income Taxes

19.                 Income Taxes

 

Refer to Note 1 within the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for a detailed discussion of the accounting policy related to income taxes.  During interim periods, the Company calculates and reports an estimated annual effective income tax rate pursuant to ASC 740-270, “Income Taxes — Interim Reporting.”

 

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

 

The Company’s effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011 of 3.9% resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $3.1 million.  The Company’s tax rate differs from the federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to non-deductible discrete items primarily associated with the write-off of goodwill related to the Investment Banking division.  The effective rate also differs from the statutory rate due to state and local taxes.

 

The Company’s effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 of negative 6.8% resulted in income tax expense of approximately $4.2 million.  The Company’s tax rate differs from the federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to non-deductible discrete items primarily associated with the write-off of goodwill related to the Investment Banking division. The effective rate also differs from the statutory rate due to state and local taxes.

 

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company calculated its income tax provision using its actual year to date effective tax rate (“discrete rate”) rather than its estimated annual effective tax rate. The Company used the discrete rate because a reliable estimate of the annual effective tax rate could not be calculated due to the magnitude of permanent items in relation to a range of possible outcomes of our operating results caused by continued market volatility.

 

The Company’s negative effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 of 395.2% resulted in income tax expense of approximately $1.3 million.  The effective rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to non-deductible Series B Preferred Stock dividends and the related non-deductible loss on early redemption, a change in the estimate of our apportioned statutory income tax rate, non-deductible share-based compensation, the indemnification revaluation, which is non-deductible for tax, and state and local income taxes. This was partially offset by a reduction in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a settlement during the quarter.

 

The Company’s effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of 23.8% resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $2.1 million. The effective income tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to non-deductible Series B Preferred Stock dividends and the related non-deductible loss on early redemption, and the indemnification revaluation, which is non-deductible for tax purposes.  The Company’s effective tax rate was offset by state and local income taxes, a reduction in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a settlement during the quarter and a benefit recorded in the first quarter due to the reversal of prior year non-deductible share-based compensation previously granted to the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”).

 

There were no significant changes to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.