NOTE 19. Commitments and Contingencies

Guarantees Relating to Certain Contractual Obligations of ClearPoint

On February 29, 2012 the Company entered into guaranties relating to certain contractual obligations of ClearPoint. Two of these guaranties were made for the benefit of certain of ClearPoint's lenders (the "Curtailment Guaranties"), and a third was made for the benefit of a purchaser of loans originated by ClearPoint. The Curtailment Guaranties were amended as of March 15, 2012, and the third guaranty was effectively terminated during the second quarter of 2012.

The Curtailment Guaranties related to loans which were financed under the warehouse lines on or about February 29, 2012 (substantially all of which have been sold) and new loans funded by the warehouse lines thereafter (the "new loans"). The Parent guaranteed certain payments with respect to these loans, ranging from 5% to 100% of the lesser of, in general, the market value or the principal amount of loans financed under the warehouse lines, depending on the length of time such loans persist on the warehouse lines, and only in the event ClearPoint cannot satisfy those payments itself.

The Parent's maximum potential liability under the Curtailment Guaranties has been substantially reduced resulting from the loan origination limits implemented by ClearPoint. The Company believes its remaining exposure under the Curtailment Guaranties, under the most likely scenarios, will not have a material impact on the Parent and/or its subsidiaries. This belief is based in large part on recent past experience, as well as the expectation of ClearPoint (or the Parent) ultimately receiving the proceeds from the sale of these loans to finance, or offset, any payments made to the parties to which the guaranties were provided.

As further disclosed within Note 29, the Curtailment Guaranties are being wound down in connection with the Homeward Transaction.

ClearPoint—Acquisition

In connection with the Company's acquisition of ClearPoint on January 3, 2011, the former stockholder of ClearPoint is entitled to receive payments consisting of no more than approximately $2.0 million payable in installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the closing date, contingent upon the continued employment of the former stockholder. These payments are to be reduced for certain matters for which the Company is indemnified, including losses resulting from any loan losses with respect to loans presented to ClearPoint or originated on or prior to January 3, 2011. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company has accrued approximately $0.3 million (paid in January 2013) and $0.8 million, respectively, in relation to this obligation which is recorded within Accrued compensation in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The indemnification arrangement has since been terminated in connection with the closing of the Homeward Transaction. The Company settled its remaining obligation of $0.1million on March 1, 2013.

AmTech—Contingent Consideration

In connection with the Company's acquisition of AmTech in October 2008, the sellers have the right to receive earnout payments consisting of the profits earned by the Equities division for fiscal years through October 1, 2011 up to an aggregate of $15 million in such profits, and 50% of such profits in excess of $15 million. Based on the results of the Equities division for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, there was no contingent consideration recorded as additional purchase price in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Leases

The Company's headquarters and sales offices, and certain office and communication equipment, are leased under non-cancelable operating leases, certain of which contain renewal options, free rent periods, and escalation clauses. These leases expire at various times through 2025. To the extent the Company is provided tenant improvement allowances funded by the lessor, they are amortized over the initial lease period and serve to reduce rent expense. The Company recognizes the rent expense over the entire lease term on a straight-line basis.

Future minimum annual lease payments, and sublease rental income, are as follows:

(In thousands)	Future Minimum Lease Payments		Sublease Rental Income		Net Lease Payments

2013	$	8,789	$	1,800	$	6,989
2014		6,922		860		6,062
2015		6,293		502		5,791
2016		5,850		—		5,850
2017		5,538		—		5,538
Thereafter		38,364		—		38,364

Total	$	71,756	$	3,162	$	68,594

Rental expense, net of sublease rental income, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 approximated $4.8 million, $4.8 million, and $8.1 million, respectively. The year ended December 31, 2010, includes (i) a termination fee and related commissions of approximately $3.2 million associated with the Company's termination of its lease of its former headquarters at 12 East 49^th Street, New York, New York and (ii) approximately $0.7 million representing the Company's remaining commitment associated with its Greenwich, Connecticut lease which has ceased being used as of November 2010.

Litigation and Other Claims

Due to the nature of the Company's business, the Company and its subsidiaries are exposed to risks associated with a variety of legal proceedings and claims. These include litigations, arbitrations and other proceedings initiated by private parties and arising from underwriting, financial advisory, securities trading or other transactional activities, client account activities, mortgage lending, employment matters and stockholder claims. Third parties who assert claims may do so for monetary damages that are substantial, particularly relative to the Company's financial position. These proceedings and claims typically involve associated legal costs incurred by the Company in connection with defending against these matters, which could be significant. The Company has been in the past, and currently is, subject to a variety of claims and litigations arising from its business, most of which it considers to be routine.

The Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to both routine and unscheduled regulatory examinations of their respective businesses and investigations of securities industry practices by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. In recent years, securities and mortgage lending firms have been subject to increased scrutiny and regulatory enforcement activity. Regulatory investigations can result in substantial fines being imposed on the Company and/or its subsidiaries. In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries receive inquiries and subpoenas from the SEC, FINRA, state regulators and other regulatory organizations. The Company does not always know the purpose behind these communications or the status or target of any related investigation. Some of these communications have, in the past, resulted in disciplinary actions which have sometimes included monetary sanctions, and in the Company and/or its subsidiaries being cited for regulatory deficiencies. To date, none of these communications have had a material adverse effect on the Company's business nor does the Company believe that any pending communications are likely to have such an effect. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that any pending or future communications will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business. In addition, the Company is also subject to claims being made by employees alleging discrimination, harassment or wrongful discharge, among other things, and seeking recoupment of compensation claimed to be owed (whether for cash or forfeited equity awards), and other damages.

The Company recognizes a liability in its financial statements with respect to legal proceedings or claims when incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable. However, accurately predicting the timing and outcome of legal proceedings and claims, including the amounts of any settlements, judgments or fines, is inherently difficult insofar as it depends on obtaining all of the relevant facts (which is sometimes not feasible) and applying to them often-complex legal principles. It is reasonably possible that the Company incurs losses pertaining to these matters in the form of settlements and/or adverse judgments and incurs legal and other expenses in defending against these matters. In either case, losses and/or expenses could be different in character or amount than anticipated by management when preparing the accompanying financial statements. Based on currently available information, the Company does not believe that any current litigation, proceeding, claim or other matter to which it is a party or otherwise involved, including any associated defense costs will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, or cash flows, although an adverse development, or an increase in associated legal fees, could be material to the Company's results of operations in a particular period, depending in part on the Company's operating results in that period.

Letters of Credit

The Company is contingently liable under bank stand-by letter of credit agreements, executed primarily in connection with office leases, totaling $4.9 million and $4.9 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These agreements were all collateralized by cash which is included within Other Assets within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Other

The Company, in the normal course of business, provides guarantees to third parties with respect to the obligations of certain of its subsidiaries.

In the normal course of business, Gleacher Securities guarantees certain service providers, such as clearing and custody agents, trustees, and administrators, against specified potential losses in connection with their acting as an agent of, or providing services to, the Company or its affiliates. Gleacher Securities also indemnifies some clients against potential losses incurred in the event of non-performance by specified third-party service providers, including sub-custodians. The maximum potential amount of future payments that Gleacher Securities could be required to make under these indemnifications cannot be estimated. However, Gleacher Securities has historically made no material payments under these arrangements and believes that it is unlikely it will have to make material payments in the future. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any contingent liability in the consolidated financial statements for these indemnifications.

The Company provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of transactions and occasionally agrees to indemnify them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties and occasionally other liabilities. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required under these indemnifications cannot be estimated. However, the Company has historically made no material payments under these agreements and believes that it is unlikely it will have to make material payments in the future; therefore it has not recorded any contingent liability in the consolidated financial statements for these indemnifications.

The Company is required to maintain a deposit at the FICC in connection with the self-clearing activities associated with the Rates business. The size of the deposit is subject to change from time to time and is dependent upon the volume of business transacted. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had a deposit with the FICC of approximately $8.8 million and $15.2 million, respectively, which is recorded within Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

In the ordinary course of business, ClearPoint indemnifies counterparties, including under its loan sale and warehouse line agreements, against potential losses incurred by such parties in connection with particular arrangements. ClearPoint reserves for its exposures to these obligations which is included within Accrued expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Amounts reserved as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are not material. In connection with the Company's acquisition of ClearPoint, the Company was previously indemnified for any such losses with respect to any loans presented to ClearPoint or originated on or prior to January 3, 2011. This indemnification has since been terminated in connection with the Homeward Transaction.

At December 31, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acting as agent, had a commitment to pay funding advances with respect to unfunded commitments pursuant to a working capital loan agreement between an unaffiliated borrower and certain lenders. This commitment was fully collateralized by $4.6 million of funds which was transferred by the lenders to the Company to satisfy this obligation. The funds were included within Cash segregated for regulatory and other purposes with an equal and offsetting payable recorded in Accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.