UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 20-F
☐ |
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 – For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 |
OR
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 – For the transition period from _________ to _________ |
OR
☐ |
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 — Date of event requiring this shell company report __________ |
Commission file number 1-03006
PLDT Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Republic of the Philippines
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Ramon Cojuangco Building
Makati Avenue
Makati City, Philippines
(Address of principal executive offices)
Atty. Ma. Lourdes C. Rausa-Chan, telephone: +(632) 816-8556; lrchan@pldt.com.ph;
Ramon Cojuangco Bldg., Makati Avenue, Makati City, Philippines
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of Company contact person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Capital Stock, Par Value Five Philippine Pesos Per Share |
|
New York Stock Exchange* |
American Depositary Shares, evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, each representing one share of Common Capital Stock |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
* |
Registered on the New York Stock Exchange not for trading but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, pursuant to the requirements of such stock exchange. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as at the close of the period covered by the annual report.
As at December 31, 2017: |
216,055,775 shares of Common Capital Stock, Par Value Five Philippine Pesos Per Share |
300,000,870 shares of Non-voting Preferred Stock, Par Value Ten Philippine Pesos Per Share |
150,000,000 shares of Voting Preferred Stock, Par Value One Philippine Peso Per Share |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act: Yes ☒ No ☐
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes ☒ No☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (of for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☐ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards1 provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ☐ |
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ☒ |
Other ☐ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
|
1 |
The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012. |
|
3 |
|||
|
4 |
|||
|
4 |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
5 |
|
Item 2. |
|
|
5 |
|
Item 3. |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Item 4. |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Item 4A. |
|
|
48 |
|
Item 5. |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
Item 6. |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
Audit, Governance and Nomination, Executive Compensation and Technology Strategy Committees |
|
99 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
102 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
102 |
||
|
|
|
104 |
|
Item 8. |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information |
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
Item 9. |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
Item 10. |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
Exchange Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Securities Holders |
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
Item 11. |
|
|
113 |
|
Item 12 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
Item 13. |
|
|
115 |
|
Item 14. |
|
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
|
115 |
Item 15. |
|
|
115 |
|
Item 16A. |
|
|
116 |
|
Item 16B. |
|
|
116 |
|
Item 16C. |
|
|
116 |
|
Item 16D. |
|
|
117 |
|
tem 16E. |
|
IPurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchaser |
|
117 |
Item 16F. |
|
|
118 |
|
Item 16G. |
|
|
118 |
|
Item 16H. |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Item 17. |
|
|
120 |
|
Item 18. |
|
|
120 |
|
Item 19. |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
Certifications |
|
|
ii
CERTAIN CONVENTIONS AND TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT
Unless the context indicates or otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our” or “PLDT Group” mean PLDT Inc. (formerly Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company) and its consolidated subsidiaries, and references to “PLDT” or “the Company” mean PLDT Inc., excluding its consolidated subsidiaries (see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for a list of these subsidiaries, including a description of their respective principal business activities).
Any discrepancies in any table between totals and the sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding.
All references to the “Philippines” contained in this report mean the Republic of the Philippines and all references to the “U.S.” or the “United States” are to the United States of America.
In this report, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, all references to “pesos,” “Philippine pesos” or “Php” are to the lawful currency of the Philippines, all references to “dollars,” “U.S. dollars” or “US$” are to the lawful currency of the United States and all references to “Japanese yen,” “JP¥” or “¥” are to the lawful currency of Japan. Unless otherwise indicated, conversion of peso amounts into U.S. dollars in this report were made based on the volume weighted average exchange rate quoted through the Philippine Dealing System, which was Php49.96 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2017. On March 26, 2018, the volume weighted average exchange rate quoted was Php52.29 to US$1.00.
In this annual report, each reference to:
|
• |
ARPU means average revenue per user; |
|
• |
BIR means Bureau of Internal Revenue; |
|
• |
BSP means Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas; |
|
• |
CMTS means cellular mobile telephone system; |
|
• |
CPCN means Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity; |
|
• |
DFON means domestic fiber optic network; |
|
• |
Digitel means Digital Telecommunications Phils., Inc.; |
|
• |
DMPI means Digitel Mobile Philippines, Inc.; |
|
• |
DSL means digital subscriber line; |
|
• |
First Pacific means First Pacific Company Limited; |
|
• |
First Pacific Group means First Pacific and its Philippine affiliates; |
|
• |
FP Parties means First Pacific and certain Philippine affiliates and wholly-owned non-Philippine subsidiary; |
|
• |
FTTH means Fiber-to-the-HOME; |
|
• |
GSM means global system for mobile communications; |
|
• |
HSPA means high-speed packet access; |
|
• |
IFRS means International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board; |
|
• |
IGF means international gateway facility; |
|
• |
IP means internet protocol; |
|
• |
IT means information technology; |
|
• |
LEC means local exchange carrier; |
|
• |
LTE means long-term evolution; |
|
• |
MVNO means mobile virtual network operations; |
|
• |
NGN means Next Generation Network; |
|
• |
NTC means the National Telecommunications Commission of the Philippines; |
|
• |
NTT means Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation; |
3
|
• |
NTT DOCOMO means NTT DOCOMO, Inc., a majority-owned and publicly traded subsidiary of NTT; |
|
• |
PAPTELCO means Philippine Association of Private Telephone Companies, Inc.; |
|
• |
PCEV means PLDT Communications and Energy Ventures, Inc.; |
|
• |
PDRs means Philippine Depositary Receipts; |
|
• |
Philippine SEC means the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission; |
|
• |
PLDT Beneficial Trust Fund means the beneficial trust fund created by PLDT to pay the benefits under the PLDT Employees’ Benefit Plan; |
|
• |
PLP means PLDT Landline Plus; |
|
• |
PSE means the Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc.; |
|
• |
R.A. means Republic Act of the Philippines; |
|
• |
SIM means Subscriber Identification Module; |
|
• |
Smart means Smart Communications, Inc.; |
|
• |
U.S. SEC means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission; |
|
• |
VAS means Value-Added Service; |
|
• |
VoIP means Voice over Internet Protocol; |
|
• |
VPN means virtual private network; |
|
• |
W-CDMA means Wideband-Code Division Multiple Access; and |
|
• |
WiMAX means Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access. |
Some information in this report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current beliefs, expectations and intentions as to facts, actions and events that will or may occur in the future. Such statements are generally identified by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “will” or other similar words.
A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from information contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including, without limitation, the risk factors set forth in Item 3. “Key Information – Risk Factors.” When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the description of risks and other cautionary statements in this report.
You should also keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made by us in this report or elsewhere speaks only as at the date on which we made it. New risks and uncertainties come up from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. We have no duty to, and do not intend to, update or revise the statements in this report after the date hereof. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should keep in mind that actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statement made in this report or elsewhere.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Our consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 included in Item 18. “Financial Statements” of this annual report on Form 20-F have been prepared in conformity with IFRS.
As at December 31, 2017, our business activities were categorized into three business units: Wireless, Fixed Line and Others.
4
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We use a number of non-GAAP performance indicators to monitor financial performance. These are summarized below and discussed later in this report.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is measured as net income excluding depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangible assets, asset impairment on noncurrent assets, financing costs, interest income, equity share in net earnings (losses) of associates and joint ventures, foreign exchange gains (losses) – net, gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments – net, provision for (benefit from) income tax and other income (expenses) – net. Adjusted EBITDA is monitored by the management for each business unit separately for purposes of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because our management believes that it is widely used by investors in their analysis of the performance of PLDT and can assist them in their comparison of PLDT’s performance with those of other companies in the technology, media and telecommunications sector. We also present Adjusted EBITDA because it is used by some investors as a way to measure a company’s ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures and meet working capital requirements. Companies in the technology, media and telecommunications sector have historically reported Adjusted EBITDA as a supplement to financial measures in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our performance, nor should Adjusted EBITDA be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or as an alternative to any other measure determined in accordance with IFRS. Unlike net income, Adjusted EBITDA does not include depreciation and amortization or financing costs and, therefore, does not reflect current or future capital expenditures or the cost of capital. We compensate for these limitations by using Adjusted EBITDA as only one of several comparative tools, together with IFRS-based measurements, to assist in the evaluation of operating performance. Such IFRS-based measurements include income before income tax, net income, and operating, investing and financing cash flows. We have significant uses of cash flows, including capital expenditures, interest payments, debt principal repayments, taxes and other non-recurring charges, which are not reflected in Adjusted EBITDA. Our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may be different from the calculation methods used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. A reconciliation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to our consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is presented in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects –– Management’s Financial Review” and Note 4 –– Operating Segment Information to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
Core Income
Core income is measured as net income attributable to equity holders of PLDT (net income less net income attributable to non-controlling interests), excluding foreign exchange gains (losses) – net, gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments – net (excluding hedge costs), asset impairment on noncurrent assets, nonrecurring gains (losses), net of tax effect of aforementioned adjustments, as applicable, and similar adjustments to equity share in net earnings (losses) of associates and joint ventures. Core income results are monitored by the management for each business unit separately for purposes of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Also, core income is used by the management as a basis for determining the level of dividend payouts to shareholders and a basis for granting incentives to employees. Core income should not be considered as an alternative to income before income tax or net income determined in accordance with IFRS as an indicator of our performance. Unlike income before income tax, core income does not include foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses on derivative financial instruments, asset impairments and nonrecurring gains and losses. We compensate for these limitations by using core income as only one of several comparative tools, together with IFRS-based measurements, to assist in the evaluation of operating performance. Such IFRS-based measurements include income before income tax and net income. Our calculation of core income may be different from the calculation methods used by other companies and, therefore, comparability
5
may be limited. A reconciliation of our consolidated core income to our consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is presented in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Management’s Financial Review” and Note 4 – Operating Segment Information to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
The selected consolidated financial information below as at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and for the financial years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements, and the accompanying notes, included elsewhere in Item 18. “Financial Statements” of this annual report on Form 20-F. As disclosed under “Presentation of Financial Information,” our consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been prepared and presented in conformity with IFRS. The selected consolidated financial information as at December 31, 2014 and 2013 have been derived from our audited financial statements not included in this annual report.
|
|
2017(1) |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||||
|
|
(in millions, except earnings per common share amounts, weighted average number of common shares, ratio of earnings to fixed charges and dividends declared per common share amounts) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
US$ 3,201 |
|
|
Php 159,926 |
|
|
Php 165,262 |
|
|
Php 171,103 |
|
|
Php 170,835 |
|
|
Php 168,211 |
|
||||||
Service revenues |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
151,165 |
|
|
|
157,210 |
|
|
|
162,930 |
|
|
|
164,943 |
|
|
|
163,932 |
|
Non-service revenues |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
8,761 |
|
|
|
8,052 |
|
|
|
8,173 |
|
|
|
5,892 |
|
|
|
4,279 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
150,415 |
|
|
|
140,559 |
|
|
|
139,268 |
|
|
|
130,457 |
|
|
|
125,514 |
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
13,466 |
|
|
|
20,162 |
|
|
|
22,075 |
|
|
|
34,090 |
|
|
|
35,453 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
13,466 |
|
|
|
20,162 |
|
|
|
22,075 |
|
|
|
34,090 |
|
|
|
33,384 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
Earnings per common share for the year attributable to equity holders of PLDT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
61.61 |
|
|
|
92.33 |
|
|
|
101.85 |
|
|
|
157.51 |
|
|
|
163.67 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
61.61 |
|
|
|
92.33 |
|
|
|
101.85 |
|
|
|
157.51 |
|
|
|
163.67 |
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations for the year attributable to equity holders of PLDT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
61.61 |
|
|
|
92.33 |
|
|
|
101.85 |
|
|
|
157.51 |
|
|
|
154.09 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
61.61 |
|
|
|
92.33 |
|
|
|
101.85 |
|
|
|
157.51 |
|
|
|
154.09 |
|
Balance Sheets Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
|
38,722 |
|
|
|
46,455 |
|
|
|
26,659 |
|
|
|
31,905 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
9,196 |
|
|
|
459,444 |
|
|
|
475,119 |
|
|
|
455,095 |
|
|
|
436,295 |
|
|
|
399,638 |
|
Net assets |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
111,183 |
|
|
|
108,537 |
|
|
|
113,898 |
|
|
|
134,668 |
|
|
|
137,326 |
|
Total long-term debt - net of current portion |
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
157,654 |
|
|
|
151,759 |
|
|
|
143,982 |
|
|
|
115,399 |
|
|
|
88,924 |
|
Total debt(2) |
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
172,611 |
|
|
|
185,032 |
|
|
|
160,892 |
|
|
|
130,123 |
|
|
|
104,090 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,971 |
|
|
|
348,261 |
|
|
|
366,582 |
|
|
|
341,197 |
|
|
|
301,627 |
|
|
|
262,312 |
|
Total equity attributable to equity holders of PLDT |
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
106,842 |
|
|
|
108,175 |
|
|
|
113,608 |
|
|
|
134,364 |
|
|
|
137,147 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares for the year (in thousands) |
|
|
216,056 |
|
|
|
216,056 |
|
|
|
216,056 |
|
|
|
216,056 |
|
|
|
216,056 |
|
|
|
216,056 |
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
51,915 |
|
|
|
34,455 |
|
|
|
31,519 |
|
|
|
31,379 |
|
|
|
30,304 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(3) |
|
2.3x |
|
|
2.3x |
|
|
3.1x |
|
|
4.0x |
|
|
6.4x |
|
|
5.7x |
|
||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
56,114 |
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
69,744 |
|
|
|
66,015 |
|
|
|
73,763 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(21,060 |
) |
|
|
(41,982 |
) |
|
|
(39,238 |
) |
|
|
(51,686 |
) |
|
|
(21,045 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(40,319 |
) |
|
|
(15,341 |
) |
|
|
(11,385 |
) |
|
|
(19,897 |
) |
|
|
(59,813 |
) |
Dividends declared to common shareholders |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
16,421 |
|
|
|
22,902 |
|
|
|
32,841 |
|
|
|
39,970 |
|
|
|
37,809 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
76.00 |
|
|
|
106.00 |
|
|
|
152.00 |
|
|
|
185.00 |
|
|
|
175.00 |
|
(1) |
We maintain our accounts in Philippine pesos, the functional and presentation currency under IFRS. For convenience, the Philippine peso financial information as at and for the year ended December 31, 2017, has been converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of Php49.96 to US$1.00, the rate quoted through the Philippine Dealing System as at December 31, 2017. This conversion should not be construed as a representation that the Philippine peso amounts represent, or have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at that rate or any other rate. |
(2) |
Total debt represents the sum of (i) current portion of long-term debt; (ii) long-term debt – net of current portion. |
(3) |
Please refer to Exhibit 7 for detailed information and computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges. |
6
The following table summarizes PLDT’s capital stock issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
No. of shares |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
||||
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
(Pesos in millions) |
|
||||||||||
Non-Voting Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock II and JJ* |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Series IV Cumulative Non-convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock** |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Voting Preferred Stock |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
Total |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
* |
On June 8, 2015, the Company issued 870 shares of Series JJ 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, which are currently outstanding. In April 2011, the Company issued 370 shares of Series II 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, all of which were redeemed by May 11, 2016. |
** |
Includes 300,000,000 shares subscribed for Php3,000,000,000, of which Php360,000,000 has been paid. |
The following table shows the dividends declared to common shareholders from the earnings for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017:
|
|
Date |
|
Amount |
|
|||||||||
Earnings |
|
Approved |
|
Record |
|
Payable |
|
Per share |
|
|
Total Declared |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in Pesos) |
|
|
(Pesos in millions) |
|
||
2015 |
|
August 4, 2015 |
|
August 27, 2015 |
|
September 25, 2015(1) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
14,044 |
|
2015 |
|
February 29, 2016 |
|
March 14, 2016 |
|
April 1, 2016 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
12,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
26,359 |
|
2016 |
|
August 2, 2016 |
|
August 16, 2016 |
|
September 1, 2016 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
10,587 |
|
2016 |
|
March 7, 2017 |
|
March 21, 2017 |
|
April 6, 2017 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
16,637 |
|
2017 |
|
August 10, 2017 |
|
August 25, 2017 |
|
September 8, 2017 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
10,371 |
|
2017 |
|
March 27, 2018 |
|
April 13, 2018 |
|
April 27, 2018 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
16,421 |
|
(1) |
Payment was moved to September 28, 2015 in view of Proclamation No. 1128, Series of 2015, dated September 15, 2015 declaring September 25, 2015 as a regular holiday. |
The following table shows a summary of dividends paid per share of PLDT's common stock stated in both Philippine peso and U.S. dollars:
|
|
In Philippine Peso |
|
|
In U.S. Dollars |
|
||
2013 |
|
|
175.00 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
Regular Dividend – April 18, 2013 |
|
|
60.00 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
Regular Dividend – September 27, 2013 |
|
|
63.00 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
Special Dividend – April 18, 2013 |
|
|
52.00 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
2014 |
|
|
185.00 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Regular Dividend – April 16, 2014 |
|
|
62.00 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
Regular Dividend – September 26, 2014 |
|
|
69.00 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
Special Dividend – April 16, 2014 |
|
|
54.00 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
2015 |
|
|
152.00 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
Regular Dividend – April 16, 2015 |
|
|
61.00 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
Regular Dividend – September 25, 2015(1) |
|
|
65.00 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
Special Dividend – April 16, 2015 |
|
|
26.00 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
2016 |
|
|
106.00 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
Regular Dividend – April 1, 2016 |
|
|
57.00 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
Regular Dividend – September 1, 2016 |
|
|
49.00 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
2017 |
|
|
76.00 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
Regular Dividend – April 6, 2017 |
|
|
28.00 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
Regular Dividend – September 8, 2017 |
|
|
48.00 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
(1) |
Payment was moved to September 28, 2015 in view of Proclamation No. 1128, Series of 2015, dated September 15, 2015 declaring September 25, 2015 as a regular holiday. |
7
Dividends on PLDT’s common stock were declared and paid in Philippine pesos. For the convenience of the reader, the Philippine peso dividends have been converted into U.S. dollars based on the Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate on the respective dates of dividend payments. See Note 20 – Equity to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further information on our dividend payments.
The Philippine government does not administratively fix the exchange rate between the Philippine peso and the U.S. dollar. Since August 1, 1992, a market average rate, known as the Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate, has been determined daily in inter-bank trading using the Philippine Dealing System. The Philippine Dealing System is a specialized off-floor direct dealing service for the trading of Philippine pesos-U.S. dollars by member banks of the Bankers Association of the Philippines, or the BAP, and BSP, the central bank of the Philippines. All members of the BAP are required to make their Philippine peso-U.S. dollar trades through this system, which was established by Telerate Financial Information Network of Hong Kong.
The following table shows the exchange rates between the Philippine peso and the U.S. dollar, expressed in Philippine pesos per U.S. dollar, for the periods indicated, based on the volume-weighted average exchange rate for each business day in each of the periods presented:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Period End |
|
|
Average(1) |
|
|
High(2) |
|
|
Low(3) |
|
||||
2013 |
|
Php 44.40 |
|
|
Php 42.66 |
|
|
Php 40.57 |
|
|
Php 44.66 |
|
||||
2014 |
|
|
44.74 |
|
|
|
44.45 |
|
|
|
43.64 |
|
|
|
44.87 |
|
2015 |
|
|
47.12 |
|
|
|
45.62 |
|
|
|
44.08 |
|
|
|
47.44 |
|
2016 |
|
|
49.77 |
|
|
|
47.67 |
|
|
|
45.92 |
|
|
|
49.98 |
|
2017 |
|
|
49.96 |
|
|
|
50.41 |
|
|
|
49.40 |
|
|
|
51.80 |
|
2018 (through March 26, 2018) |
|
|
52.29 |
|
|
|
51.42 |
|
|
|
49.77 |
|
|
|
52.34 |
|
Source: Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate
(1) |
Calculated by using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period. |
(2) |
Highest exchange rate for the period. |
(3) |
Lowest exchange rate for the period. |
|
|
Month |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Period End |
|
|
Average(1) |
|
|
High(2) |
|
|
Low(3) |
|
||||
2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
Php 50.83 |
|
|
Php 50.99 |
|
|
Php 50.63 |
|
|
Php 51.24 |
|
||||
October |
|
|
51.69 |
|
|
|
51.39 |
|
|
|
50.95 |
|
|
|
51.80 |
|
November |
|
|
50.35 |
|
|
|
50.97 |
|
|
|
50.35 |
|
|
|
51.49 |
|
December |
|
|
49.96 |
|
|
|
50.37 |
|
|
|
49.92 |
|
|
|
50.74 |
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
51.34 |
|
|
|
50.57 |
|
|
|
49.77 |
|
|
|
51.42 |
|
February |
|
|
52.07 |
|
|
|
51.82 |
|
|
|
51.21 |
|
|
|
52.35 |
|
March (through March 26, 2018) |
|
|
52.29 |
|
|
|
52.06 |
|
|
|
51.86 |
|
|
|
52.34 |
|
Source: Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate
(1) |
Calculated by using the average of the exchange rates during the month. |
(2) |
Highest exchange rate for the month. |
(3) |
Lowest exchange rate for the month. |
This report contains conversions of Philippine peso amounts into U.S. dollars for your convenience. Unless otherwise specified, these conversions were made at the Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate as at December 31, 2017 of Php49.96 to US$1.00. You should not assume that such Philippine peso amounts represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated, or at any particular rate. As at March 26, 2018, the exchange rate quoted through the Philippine Dealing System was Php52.29 to US$1.00. Unless otherwise specified, the weighted average exchange rate of the Philippine peso to the U.S. dollar for a given year used in the following discussions in this report was calculated using the average of the daily exchange rates quoted through the Philippine Dealing System during the year.
8
Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
You should carefully consider all of the information in this annual report, including the risks and uncertainties described below. If any of the following risks actually occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and the trading price of our ADSs could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to Us
If we are not able to adapt to changes and disruptions in technology and by over-the-top, or OTT, services and address changing consumer demand on a timely basis, we may experience a decline in the demand for our services, be unable to implement our business strategy and experience a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
The rapid change of technology and proliferation of OTT services, also known as VoIP services (such as Facebook, Skype, Viber, WhatsApp and other similar services), have disrupted our business. Due to the adoption of new technologies, changing customer habits, and the growing popularity of these new OTT services, our traditional revenue sources, such as short messaging service, or SMS, voice and international calling services, have declined, and we expect this trend to continue.
Growing mobile data usage in the Philippines, coupled with the prevalence of OTT services have negatively impacted our domestic calling service in recent years. OTT services continue to increasingly compete with us in voice and data services and continue to affect our business model. We are also facing growing competition from providers offering services using alternative wireless technologies and IP-based networks, including efforts by the Philippine government to roll-out its free WiFi services to various municipalities in the country. Moreover, net settlement payments between PLDT and other foreign telecommunications carriers for origination and termination of international call traffic between the Philippines and other countries, which have been our predominant source of foreign currency revenues, have been declining in recent years.
Our capital costs could increase as we phase out outdated and unprofitable technologies and invest in new ones. We may not be able to accurately predict technological trends or the success of new services in the market. In addition, there could be legal or regulatory restraints on our introduction of new services. If our services fail to gain acceptance in the marketplace, or if costs associated with implementation and completion of the introduction of these services materially increase, our ability to retain and attract customers could be adversely affected. We can neither assure you that we would be able to adopt or successfully implement new technologies and services nor assure you that future technological changes will not adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
The anticipated entry of a third major telecommunications player and/or increased competition from other telecommunications services providers may reduce our market share and decrease our profit margin, and we cannot assure you that any potential change in the competitive landscape of the telecommunications industry in the Philippines would not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Increasing competition among existing telecommunications services providers, as well as competition from new competitors, could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects by, among other factors, forcing us to lower our tariffs, reducing or reversing the growth of our customer base and reducing usage of our services. Competition in the mobile telecommunications industry is particularly intense, with network coverage, quality of service, product offerings, and price dictating subscriber preference, while competition in the fixed line side is beginning to escalate as well. Vital capacity and coverage expansion may continue to increase our capital expenditures. Recently, operators have grown more aggressive in maintaining and growing market share, especially in light of a maturing market. Our principal mobile competitor, Globe, has introduced aggressive marketing campaigns and promotions, such as unlimited voice, SMS, and data offers. It has also expressed interest to compete more actively in the fixed line segment, and has started to offer fixed line products and services.
9
In 2017, the Philippine government announced its intentions to introduce in the Philippines telecommunications market a third major company. The process for the establishment of this third major player is currently underway, and is heavily supported by the Philippine government. Media reports indicate that established international telecommunications companies are part of the shortlist. A third major player will likely adversely threaten our market share. Furthermore we believe that the third player, when it enters the market, may put forth aggressive offers to lure customers away from us and Globe. To maintain our competitive posture, we may need to match those offers and offer other incentives to prevent existing customers from switching. A loss of market share and increased costs to maintain our competitive posture will adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to the entry of a third major player, we cannot assure you that the number of providers of telecommunications services will not increase in the future or that competition for customers will not cause our mobile and fixed line subscribers to switch to other operators, or otherwise cause us to increase our marketing expenditures, lose customers or reduce our rates, resulting in a reduction in our profitability.
Our ability to compete effectively will depend on, among other things, network coverage, quality of service, price, our development of new and enhanced products and services, the reach and quality of our sales and distribution channels and our capital resources. It will also depend on how successfully we anticipate and respond to various factors affecting our industry, including new technologies and business models, changes in consumer preferences and demand for existing services, demographic trends and economic conditions. If we are not able to respond successfully to these competitive challenges, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our reliance on outsourcing and strategic sourcing arrangements, technology vendor contracts, and other partnerships and/or joint ventures may prevent us from meeting organizational targets or impact our brand image.
We have entered into a number of outsourcing agreements with technology vendors covering key operations in order to improve efficiencies and maximize knowledge transfer. These arrangements may disrupt existing operations and result in resistance among employees. Furthermore, any delays in implementation or failure to bring about the desired results will hamper our ability to meet our medium-term targets.
In particular, as part of our extensive capital expenditures program to overhaul our fixed and wireless networks infrastructure and our IT systems, we have entered into agreements with Amdocs and Huawei to upgrade and modernize a significant portion of our IT infrastructure. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to accomplish this transformation in a timely fashion, or at all, or in the manner intended. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that such transformation will not result in service disruptions, network outages or encounter other issues that may detrimentally affect consumer experience. This may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business relies heavily as well on third party vendors, some of whom may encounter financial difficulties or consolidate with other vendors. This may result in shrinking the already limited pool of qualified vendors which in turn may materially impact their ability to fulfill their obligations and thereby impact our operations.
The mobile telecommunications industry in the Philippines may not continue to grow.
The majority of our total revenues are currently derived from the provision of mobile services to customers in the Philippines. As a result, we depend on the continued development and growth of this industry in the Philippines. The mobile penetration rate in the country, however, has already reached approximately 118% as at December 31, 2017, and thus the industry may well be considered mature. Further growth of the market depends on many factors beyond our control, including the continued introduction of new and enhanced mobile devices, the price levels of mobile handsets, consumer tastes and preferences, and the amount of disposable income of existing and potential subscribers. Any economic, technological or other developments resulting in a reduction in demand for mobile services or otherwise causing the Philippine mobile telecommunications industry to stop growing or reducing the rate of its growth, could materially harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
10
The licenses, franchises and regulatory approvals, upon which PLDT relies, may be subject to revocation or delay, which could result in the suspension of our services or abandonment of any planned expansions and could thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Failure to comply with the foreign ownership restrictions
Section 11, Article XII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution provides that no franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations of associations organized under the laws of the Philippines, at least 60% of whose capital is owned by such citizens. Exceeding the foreign ownership restrictions imposed under the Philippine Constitution may subject the Company to (1) sanctions set out in Section 14 of the Philippine Foreign Investments Act of 1991, as amended, comprising a fine not exceeding (a) the lower of (x) 0.5% of the total paid in capital of the Company and (y) Php5 million, in the case of a corporate entity, (b) Php200,000, in the case of the president of the Company or other responsible officers, and (c) Php100,000, in the case of other natural persons, which we refer to collectively as the Monetary Sanctions, and/or (2) the Philippine government commencing a quo warranto case in the name of the Republic of the Philippines against the Company to revoke the Company’s franchise that permits the Company to engage in telecommunications activities.
We believe that as of the date of this report, PLDT is in compliance with the requirements of the Constitution, and this position was recently supported by the Supreme Court; however, we cannot assure you that subsequent changes in law or additional litigation would not result in a different conclusion. See Item 8. “Financial Information – Legal Proceedings” and Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies – In the Matter of the Wilson Gamboa Case and Jose M. Roy III Petition to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.
Failure to renew CPCNs
We operate our business under franchises, each of which is subject to amendment, termination or repeal by the Philippine Congress, and to various provisional authorities and CPCNs, which have been granted by the NTC and will expire between now and 2028. Some of our CPCNs and provisional authorities have already expired. Although we have filed applications for extension of these CPCNs and provisional authorities, we cannot assure you that the NTC will grant the applications for renewal. Failure to renew CPCNs can materially and adversely affect our ability to conduct the essential functions of our business, and therefore adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Licenses and Regulations” for more information.
Failure to comply with R.A. 7925
The Philippine Congress may revoke, or the Solicitor General of the Philippines may file a case against Smart and DMPI to revoke, the franchise of Smart and DMPI for their failure to comply with R.A. 7925, which requires making a public offering of at least 30% of the aggregate common shares of a telecommunications entity with regulated types of services. See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Material Effects of Regulation on our Business” for further discussion.
On May 19, 2017, Republic Act No. 10926 took effect which extended the Legislative Franchise of Smart. The law contains a provision which exempts Smart from the requirement of listing of shares if a grantee is wholly owned by a publicly listed company with at least thirty per centum (30%) of whose authorized capital stock is publicly listed. Thus, Smart is in compliance with RA 7925.
We cannot assure you that any of our franchise, permits or licenses will not be revoked and any such revocation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions or prospects.
Our business is significantly affected by laws and regulations, including regulations in respect of rates and taxes and laws relating to anti-competitive practices and monopoly.
The NTC regulates the rates we are permitted to charge for services that have not yet been deregulated, such as local exchange services. We cannot assure you that the NTC will not impose additional obligations on us that could lead to the revocation of our licenses if not adhered to and/or to the reduction in our total revenues or profitability. The NTC could adopt changes to the regulations or implement additional guidelines governing our
11
interconnection with other telecommunications companies or the rates and terms upon which we provide services to our customers. The occurrence of any of these changes could materially reduce our revenues and profitability.
The PLDT Group is also subject to a number of national and local taxes. We cannot assure you that the PLDT Group will not be subject to new, increased and/or additional taxes and that the PLDT Group would be able to impose or pass on additional charges or fees on its customers to compensate for the imposition of such taxes or charges, or for the loss of fees and/or charges.
Moreover, we are subject to laws and regulations relating to anti-competitive practices and anti-monopoly. The Philippine Competition Act came into effect on August 8, 2015 and prohibits practices that restrict market competition through anti-competitive agreements and abuse of a dominant position. It also requires parties to provide notification and obtain clearance for certain mergers and acquisitions. The Philippine Competition Act prescribes administrative and criminal penalties for violations of these prohibitions. While our business practices have not in the past been found to have violated any laws and regulations related to anti-competition and anti-monopoly, we cannot assure you that any new or existing governmental regulators will not, in the future, find our business practices to have an anti-competitive effect on the Philippine telecommunications industry, nor can we assure you that we will not be found to have violated the relevant laws and regulations relating to anti-competition and anti-monopoly in the future.
In particular, PLDT was engaged in litigation with the Philippine Competition Commission, or the PCC, relating to PLDT’s investments in VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare, or the SMC Transactions. Although the Court of Appeals, or CA, among other things, compelled the PCC to recognize that the SMC Transactions as deemed approved by operation of law, the CA did clarify the that the deemed approved status of the SMC Transactions does not, however, remove the power of PCC to conduct post-acquisition review to ensure that no anti-competitive conduct is committed by the parties. Any future expansion in our services, particularly in our mobile services, could subject us to additional conditions in the granting of our provisional authorities by the NTC and to increased regulatory scrutiny, which could harm our reputation and business, and which could have a material adverse effect on our growth and prospects. In addition, the occurrence of any such event could impose substantial costs or cause interruptions or considerable delays in the provision, development or expansion of our services. See Note 10 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Notice of Transaction filed with the Philippine Competition Commission, or PCC to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.
Changes in regulations or user concerns regarding privacy and protection of user data, or any failure to comply with such laws, could adversely affect our business.
Legislation such as R.A. 10173 or the Philippine Data Privacy Act of 2012, or the Privacy Act, its Implementing Rules and Regulations and other related issuances of the Philippine SEC recognizes as a policy of the Philippine government the protection of the fundamental human right of privacy, while ensuring the free flow of information to promote innovation and growth. The Privacy Act provides for the protection of personal data of Philippine data subjects, which are subjected to processing conducted by any natural and juridical person in the government or private sector. The Philippine SEC has been actively enforcing the implementation and compliance of entities covered by the Privacy Act since the release of its Rules in 2016.
We began the design and implementation of a Personal Data Privacy Policy (the “Policy”) in 2016. This Policy requires the regular conduct of privacy impact assessments against business processes, products, and systems that involve any form of processing of personal data. Such assessments have resulted in major process overhauls and adjustments to contractual obligations of third-party business partners.
Failure to adhere to this Policy may result in penalties and sanctions against erring or negligent employees and third-party business partners. We have employed measures to ensure the protection of related data, so as to avoid the loss of customer confidence and damage to the PLDT brands, any of which could potentially have an adverse effect to business. We cannot, however, guarantee these measures will be successful.
Similar foreign regulatory bodies have likewise introduced data protection standards and regulations concerning cross border data processing. Some countries have achieved a more mature state of implementation, while other countries have yet to define or implement them. While the Philippines may generally be considered to be in the early stages of adoption, our exposure to international markets and partners which require cross border data processing may become a challenge in our operations. International laws need to be interpreted and considered in our policies and practices, which may consequently require material changes to internal business operations and practices. Complying with these varying international requirements may lead to substantial implementation costs or penalties in the case of non-compliance.
12
Inadequate handling of confidential information, including personal customer information by our corporate group, contractors and others, may adversely affect our credibility or corporate image.
We possess a substantial amount of personal information of our customers. In the event an information leak occurs, we might be subjected to penalties under the data privacy law, our credibility and corporate image may be significantly damaged, and we may experience an increase in cancellations of customer contracts and slower increase in additional subscriptions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Legislation and regulation of online payment systems could create unexpected costs, subject us to enforcement actions for compliance failures, or cause us to change our digital technology platforms or business models.
Regulators have been increasing their focus on online and mobile payment services, and recent regulatory and other developments could reduce the convenience or utility of our payment services for users. Governmental regulation of certain aspects of mobile payments systems under which PLDT operates could result in obligations or restrictions with respect to the types of products that we may offer to consumers, the payment card systems that link to our mobile payments systems, the jurisdictions in which our payment services or apps may be used, and higher costs, such as fees charged by banks to process funds through our mobile payments systems. Such obligations and restrictions could be further increased as more jurisdictions regulate payment systems. Moreover, if this regulation is used to provide resources or preferential treatment or protection to selected payments and processing providers, it could displace us from, or prevent us from entering into, or substantially restrict us from participating in, particular geographies.
Limitations in the amount of frequency spectrum or facilities made available to us could negatively affect our ability to maintain and improve our service quality and level of customer satisfaction, could increase our costs and could reduce our competitiveness.
The available radio frequency spectrum is one of the principal limitations on a wireless network’s capacity, and there are limitations in the spectrum and facilities available to us to provide our services. Our future wireless growth will increasingly depend on our ability to offer innovative video products and data services and a wireless network that has sufficient spectrum and capacity to support these innovations. Improvements in our service depend on many factors, including continued access to and deployment of adequate spectrum.
Our competitiveness may decline if we cannot obtain the necessary or optimal allocation of spectrum from the Philippine government. If the Philippine government does not fairly allocate spectrum to wireless providers in general, revoke spectrum previously granted to us, or if we cannot acquire needed spectrum or deploy the services customers desire on a timely basis without burdensome conditions or at adequate cost while maintaining network quality levels, then our ability to attract and retain customers, and therefore maintain and improve our operating margins, could be materially adversely affected.
Other mobile service providers in the world may not adopt or use the technologies and the frequency bands that are compatible with ours, which could affect our ability to sufficiently offer international services.
If a sufficient number of mobile service providers do not adopt the technologies and the frequency bands that are compatible with ours, if mobile service providers switch to other technologies or frequency bands, or if there is a delay in the introduction and expansion of compatible technologies and frequency bands, we may not be able to offer international roaming or other international services as expected, which may adversely affect our business.
We may not be successful in our acquisitions of, and investments in, other companies and businesses, and may therefore be unable to fully implement our business strategy.
As growth slows or reverses in our traditional fixed line and mobile businesses, and as part of our strategy to grow other business segments, we make acquisitions and investments in companies or businesses to enter new businesses or defend our existing markets. The success of our acquisitions and investments depends on a number of factors, such as:
|
• |
our ability to identify suitable opportunities for investment or acquisition; |
|
• |
our ability to reach an acquisition or investment agreement on terms that are satisfactory to us or at all; |
|
• |
the extent to which we are able to influence or exercise control over the acquired company; |
13
|
• |
our ability to successfully integrate the acquired company or business with our existing businesses. |
Any of our contemplated acquisitions and investments may not be consummated due to reasons or factors beyond our control. Even if any contemplated acquisitions and investments are consummated, we may not be able to realize any or all of the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions and investments and we cannot assure you that the consummation of such acquisitions and investments will not result in losses for a prolonged period of time. Moreover, if we are unsuccessful in our contemplated acquisitions and investments, we may not be able to fully implement our business strategy to maintain or grow certain of our businesses and our results of operations and financial position could be materially and adversely affected.
We are exposed to the fluctuations in the market values of our investments.
Given the nature of our business and our foray into the digital business, we have made investments in various start-up companies. For example, in 2014, we invested in Rocket Internet SE (formerly Rocket Internet AG), or Rocket, to drive the development of online and mobile payment solutions, the fair value of which has declined significantly since our investment. Due to the significant decline in fair value of our investment in Rocket Internet, we recognized a series of impairments that amount to, in the aggregate, Php11,045 million, since then. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 11 – Available-for-Sale Financial Investments – Investment of PLDT Online in Rocket Internet to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for more information. Credit ratings and market values of this investment and similar investments can be negatively impacted by liquidity, credit deterioration or losses, financial results, foreign exchange rates, or other factors. As a result, our investments could decline and result in a material impairment, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
If we are unable to install and maintain telecommunications facilities and equipment in a timely manner, we may not be able to maintain our current market share and the quality of our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our business requires the regular installation of new, and the maintenance of existing, telecommunications transmission and other facilities and equipment, which are being undertaken. The installation and maintenance of these facilities and equipment are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, such as:
|
• |
shortages of equipment, materials and labor; |
|
• |
delays in issuance of national and local government building permits; |
|
• |
work stoppages and labor disputes; |
|
• |
interruptions resulting from man-made events (e.g., sabotage), inclement weather and other natural disasters; |
|
• |
rapid technological obsolescence |
|
• |
inability of vendors to deliver on commitments |
|
• |
unforeseen engineering, environmental and geological problems; and |
|
• |
unanticipated cost increases. |
Any of these factors could give rise to delays or cost overruns in the installation of new facilities or equipment or could prevent us from deploying our networks and properly maintaining the equipment used in our networks, and hence could affect our ability to maintain existing services and roll-out new services, for example, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Actual or perceived health risks or other problems relating to mobile handsets or transmission masts could lead to litigation or decreased mobile communications usage.
The effects of, and any damage caused by, exposure to an electromagnetic field remain the subject of careful evaluations by the international scientific community. We cannot rule out that exposure to electromagnetic fields or other emissions originating from mobile handsets will not be identified as a health risk in the future. Our mobile business may be harmed as a result of any future alleged, or actual, health risk or the perception of any
14
health risk, which could result in a lower number of customers, reduced usage per customer or even potential consumer liability.
Our business relies on secure network infrastructure and computer systems, and any cyber-attacks against them, or the perception of such attacks, may materially adversely affect our operations, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business operations rely on us securely maintaining our network infrastructure and computer systems. A cyber-attack on our systems could cause service disruptions, damage to our systems and infrastructure, including damage to our physical assets, malfunction of our technology or services, accidental and/or deliberate misuse of our systems and other assets, alteration of our technology, publication of our proprietary technologies, methods, processes, business strategies and other confidential information, as well as unauthorized access to confidential information about our customers, including their financial information, any of which may lead to reputational harm, loss of confidence in our brand, litigation, regulatory actions and loss in customers, each of which, individually or in the aggregate may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
During 2017, Smart subscribers reported cases of not being able to access popular websites or common mobile applications as well as frequent prompts for captcha verification (end-user validation which requires the user to input certain information or complete certain task to access the desired webpage). Upon investigation, it was revealed that spam emails and malware network activities were emanating from our subscribers’ devices. Our IP ranges were consequently black-listed and tagged with poor reputation. To resolve the issue, we implemented several measures to prevent spam activity on our network.
In order to minimize our exposure to cyber security risks, we have deployed a multi-layered defense mechanism from the network to the host and up to the application level. However, we can neither assure you that any of such defenses will be effective against or neutralize the effects of any cyber incidents resulting from unintentional cyber security breaches or deliberate attacks on our network infrastructure or computer systems, nor assure you that our business will not be significantly disrupted in the event of such security breach or attack. If we fail to timely and effectively prevent the occurrence of any new or existing cyber security incidents, or fail to promptly rectify any such incidents, our business could be significantly disrupted, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, and the confidence of our stakeholders could be lost.
Cable and equipment theft, equipment failures, natural disasters, man-made events, terrorist acts and territorial disputes may materially adversely affect our operations.
Theft of telecommunication cables, major equipment failures or natural disasters, including severe weather, terrorist acts or other similar or related contingencies could adversely affect our wireline and wireless networks, including telephone switching offices, microwave links, third-party-owned local and long-distance networks on which we rely, our cell sites or other equipment, our customer account support and information systems, or employee and business records, and could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our businesses require substantial capital investment, which we may not be able to finance.
Our projects under development and the continued maintenance and improvement of our networks and services, including Smart’s projects, networks, platforms and services, require substantial ongoing capital investment. Our consolidated capital expenditures totaled Php40,299 million, Php42,825 million and Php43,175 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We currently estimate that our consolidated capital expenditures in 2018 will be approximately Php58 billion.
Future strategic initiatives could require us to incur significant additional capital expenditures. We may be required to finance a portion of our future capital expenditures from external financing sources, some of which have not yet been fully arranged. There can be no assurance that financing for new projects will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot complete our development programs or other capital projects on time due to our failure to obtain the required financing, our growth, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
15
Our results of operations and our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the Philippine peso significantly fluctuates against the U.S. dollar.
A substantial portion of our capital expenditures, a portion of our indebtedness and related interest expense and a portion of our operating expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars and other foreign currencies, whereas most of our revenues are denominated in Philippine pesos. See Note 21 – Interest-bearing Financial Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
A depreciation of the Philippine peso against the U.S. dollar would increase the amount of our U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations, capital expenditures, and operating and interest expenses in Philippine peso terms. In the event that the Philippine peso depreciates against the U.S. dollar, we may be unable to generate enough funds through operations and other means to offset the resulting increase in our obligations in Philippine peso terms. Moreover, a depreciation of the Philippine peso against the U.S. dollar may result in our recognition of significant foreign exchange losses, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. A depreciation of the Philippine peso could also cause us not to be in compliance with the financial covenants imposed on us by our lenders under certain loan agreements and other indebtedness. Further, fluctuations in the Philippine peso value and of interest rates impact the mark-to-market gains/losses of certain of our financial debt instruments, which were designated as non-hedged items.
The Philippine peso has been subject to significant depreciation in recent years with the Philippine peso depreciated by approximately 21% from a high of Php41.08 for year end 2012 to Php49.96 as at December 31, 2017 and further depreciated to Php52.29 as at March 26, 2018. We cannot assure you that the Philippine peso will not depreciate further and be subject to significant fluctuations going forward, due to a range of factors, including:
|
• |
political and economic developments affecting the Philippines, including the level of remittances from overseas Filipino workers; |
|
• |
global economic and financial trends; |
|
• |
the volatility of emerging market currencies; |
|
• |
any interest rate increases by the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States and/or the BSP; and |
|
• |
higher demand for U.S. dollars by both banks and domestic businesses to service their maturing U.S. dollar obligations or foreign exchange traders including banks covering their short U.S. dollar positions, among others. |
Our debt instruments contain restrictive covenants which require us to maintain certain financial tests and our indebtedness could impair our ability to fulfill our financial obligations and service our other debt.
Our existing debt instruments contain covenants which, among other things, require PLDT to maintain certain financial ratios and other financial tests, calculated on the basis of IFRS at relevant measurement dates, principally at the end of each quarter period. For a description of some of these covenants, see Note 21 – Interest-bearing Financial Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
Our indebtedness and the requirements and limitations imposed by our debt covenants could have important consequences. For example, we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to payments on our indebtedness, which could reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements.
The principal factors that could negatively affect our ability to comply with the financial ratio covenants and other financial tests under our debt instruments are depreciation of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar, poor operating performance of PLDT and our consolidated subsidiaries, impairment or similar charges in respect of investments or other long-lived assets that may be recognized by PLDT and its consolidated subsidiaries, and increases in our interest expenses. Of our total consolidated debts, approximately 20% and 31% were denominated in U.S. dollars as at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Considering our consolidated hedges and U.S. dollar cash balances allocated for debt, the unhedged portion of the consolidated debt amounts were approximately 8% in each of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and therefore these financial ratios and other tests are expected to be negatively affected by any weakening of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar.
If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations or comply with our debt covenants, we may need to restructure or refinance our indebtedness, seek additional equity capital or sell assets. An inability to effect these measures successfully could result in a declaration of default and an acceleration of maturities of some or all of
16
our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our subsidiaries could be limited in their ability to pay dividends to us due to internal cash requirements and their creditors having superior claims over their assets and cash flows, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition.
A significant part of our total revenues and cash flows from operations are derived from our subsidiaries, particularly Smart. Smart has significant internal cash requirements for debt service, capital expenditures and operating expenses and as a result, may be financially unable to pay any dividends to PLDT. Although Smart has been making dividend payments to PLDT regularly since December 2002, there can be no assurance that PLDT will continue to receive these dividends or other distributions, or otherwise be able to derive liquidity from Smart or any other subsidiary or investee in the future.
Creditors of our subsidiaries generally have priority claims over our subsidiaries’ assets and cash flows. We and our creditors will effectively be subordinated to the existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, of our subsidiaries, except that we may be recognized as a creditor with respect to loans we have made to subsidiaries. If we are recognized as a creditor of a subsidiary, our claim will still be subordinated to any indebtedness secured by assets of the subsidiary and any indebtedness of the subsidiary otherwise deemed superior to the indebtedness we hold.
We may have difficulty meeting our debt payment obligations if we do not continue to receive cash dividends from our subsidiaries and our financial condition could be materially and adversely affected as a result.
A significant number of shares of PLDT’s voting stock are held by four shareholders, which may not act in the interests of other shareholders or stakeholders in PLDT.
As at January 31, 2018, the First Pacific Group and its Philippine affiliates, NTT Communications and NTT DOCOMO, and JG Summit Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates, or JG Summit Group, collectively, beneficially own approximately 53.93% in PLDT’s outstanding common stock (representing 31.83% of our overall voting stock). See Item 7. “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions” for further details regarding the shareholdings of NTT Communications and NTT DOCOMO in PLDT, and the rights granted pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, Strategic Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement.
Additionally, all of PLDT’s shares of voting preferred stock, which represent approximately 41% of PLDT’s total outstanding shares of voting stock are owned by a single stockholder, BTF Holdings, Inc., or BTFHI.
The FP Parties and/or NTT Communications and/or NTT DOCOMO and/or JG Summit Group and/or BTFHI may exercise their respective voting rights over certain decisions and transactions in a manner that could be contrary to the interests of other shareholders or stakeholders in PLDT.
Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could adversely impact investor confidence and the market price of our common shares and ADSs, and have a material adverse effect on our business, our reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
We are required to comply with various Philippine and U.S. laws and regulations on internal control. However, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Therefore, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, including our failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results could be harmed, we could fail to meet our reporting obligations and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, our reputation, financial condition and results of operations, and the market prices of our common shares and ADSs could decline significantly.
We are unionized and are vulnerable to work stoppages, slowdowns or increased labor costs.
As at December 31, 2017, PLDT has three employee unions, representing in the aggregate 5,328, or 30%, of the employees of the PLDT Group. This unionized workforce could result in demands that may increase our
17
operating expenses and adversely affect our profitability. For instance, PLDT experienced a significant charge from its manpower rightsizing program in 2017, mainly incurred in the fixed-line business. See Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Compensation and Employee Benefits to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”. Each of our different employee groups may require separate collective bargaining agreements. If any group of our employees and PLDT are unable to reach agreement on the terms of their collective bargaining agreement or we were to experience widespread employee dissatisfaction, we could be subject to work slowdowns or stoppages. Any of these events would be disruptive to our operations and could harm our business.
Additionally, in 2017, PLDT received a Compliance Order from the Department of Labor and Employment of the Philippines, or DOLE, on July 3, 2017 in connection with the non-payment of statutorily required monetary benefits, including the 13th month salary, to certain contract workers. The Compliance Order held the PLDT Group liable for Php78.6 million. We cannot guarantee that PLDT or its subsidiaries will not be subject to similar proceedings or other labor-related regulatory activities, the results of which may have an adverse reputational and/or financial impact. See Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
The loss of key personnel or the failure to attract and retain highly qualified personnel could compromise our ability to effectively manage our business and pursue our growth strategy.
Our future performance depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified key technical, development, sales, services and management personnel. The loss of key employees could result in significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of replacement personnel could be costly and time consuming, could cause additional disruptions to our business, and could be unsuccessful. We cannot guarantee the continued employment of any of the members of our senior leadership team, who may depart our Company for any number of reasons, such as other business opportunities, differing views on our strategic direction or other personal reasons. Any inability to attract, retain or motivate our personnel could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and prospects.
Adverse results of any pending or future litigation, internal or external investigations and/or disputes may impact PLDT’s cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
We are currently involved in various legal proceedings. Our estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims have been developed in consultation with our counsel handling the defense in these matters and is based upon our analysis of potential results. Our future financial performance could be materially affected by an adverse outcome or by changes in our estimates or effectiveness of our strategies relating to these proceedings and assessments.
For more information on PLDT’s legal proceedings, see Item 8. “Financial Information – Legal Proceedings” and Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies to the accompanying consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements.” While PLDT believes the positions it has taken in these cases are legally valid, the final results of these cases may prove to be different from its expectations. In addition, there is no assurance that PLDT will not be involved in future litigation or other disputes, the results of which may materially and adversely impact its business and financial conditions.
Risks Relating to the Philippines
PLDT’s business may be adversely affected by political or social or economic instability in the Philippines.
The Philippines is subject to political, social and economic volatility that, directly or indirectly, could have a material adverse impact on our ability to sustain our business and growth.
The Philippines, China and several Southeast Asian nations have been engaged in a series of long-standing territorial disputes over certain islands in the West Philippine Sea, also known as the South China Sea. Should these territorial disputes continue or escalate further, the Philippines and its economy may be disrupted and our operations could be adversely affected as a result. In particular, further disputes between the Philippines and China may lead both countries to impose trade restrictions on the other’s imports. Any such impact from these disputes could adversely affect the Philippine economy, and materially and adversely affect our business, financial position and financial performance.
We cannot assure you that the political environment in the Philippines will be stable or that the current or any future government will adopt economic policies that are conducive to sustained economic growth or which do not
18
materially and adversely impact the current regulatory environment for the telecommunications and other companies.
If foreign exchange controls were to be imposed, our ability to meet our foreign currency payment obligations could be adversely affected.
The Philippine government has, in the past, instituted restrictions on the conversion of the Philippine peso into foreign currencies and the use of foreign exchange received by Philippine companies to pay foreign currency-denominated obligations. The Monetary Board of the BSP has statutory authority, with the approval of the President of the Philippines, during a foreign exchange crisis or in times of national emergency, to:
|
• |
suspend temporarily or restrict sales of foreign exchange; |
|
• |
require licensing of foreign exchange transactions; or |
|
• |
require the delivery of foreign exchange to the BSP or its designee banks. |
We cannot assure you that foreign exchange controls will not be imposed in the future. If imposed, these restrictions could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain foreign currency to service our foreign currency obligations.
As a foreign private issuer, we follow certain home country corporate governance practices which may afford less protection to holders of our ADSs.
As a foreign private issuer incorporated in the Philippines and listed on the PSE, we are permitted under applicable NYSE rules to follow certain home country corporate governance practices. The corporate governance practice and requirements in the Philippines do not require us to have a majority of the members of our board of directors to be independent, and do not require regularly scheduled executive sessions of non-management directors or regularly scheduled executive sessions where only independent directors are present. Further, the criteria for independence of directors and audit committee members applicable in the Philippines differ from those applicable under the NYSE rules. These Philippine home country corporate governance practices may afford less protection to holders of our ADSs.
The credit ratings of the Philippines may restrict the access to capital of Philippine companies, including PLDT.
Historically, the Philippines’ sovereign debt has been rated non-investment grade by international credit rating agencies. In December 2017, the Philippines’ long-term foreign currency-denominated debt was affirmed by Fitch Ratings, or Fitch, as investment-grade with a rating of BBB+ with a stable outlook, and Standard and Poor’s, or S&P, and Moody’s Investor Service, or Moody’s, affirmed the Philippines’ long-term foreign currency-denominated debt to the investment-grade rating of BBB+ and Baa2, respectively, with a stable outlook. Though investment grade, the relatively low sovereign rating of the Philippine Government will directly and adversely affect companies domiciled in the Philippines as international credit rating agencies issue credit ratings by reference to that of the sovereign. No assurance can be given that Fitch, Moody’s, S&P, or any other international credit rating agency will not downgrade the credit ratings of the Philippine Government in the future and, therefore, Philippine companies, including PLDT. Any such downgrade could have a material adverse impact on the liquidity in the Philippine financial markets, the ability of the Philippine Government and Philippine companies, including PLDT, to raise additional financing, and the interest rates and other commercial terms at which such additional financing is available.
We are one of the leading telecommunications service providers in the fixed line, wireless and broadband markets in the Philippines, in terms of both subscribers and revenues. Through our three principal business segments (Wireless, Fixed Line and Others), we offer a large and diverse range of telecommunications services across the Philippines’ most extensive fiber optic backbone and wireless and fixed line networks.
We are the leading fixed line service provider in the Philippines accounting for approximately 64% of the total reported fixed line subscribers nationwide as at December 31, 2017. Smart and DMPI, the PLDT Group’s mobile service providers, collectively, account for approximately 49% of the total reported mobile subscribers nationwide as at December 31, 2017.
19
Our common shares are listed and traded on the PSE and our ADSs are listed and traded on the NYSE in the United States.
We had a market capitalization of approximately Php319,763 million, or US$6,400 million, as at December 31, 2017, representing one of the largest market capitalizations among Philippine-listed companies. We had total revenues of Php159,926 million, or US$3,201 million, and net income attributable to equity holders of PLDT of Php13,371 million, or US$268 million, for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Historical Background and Development
PLDT was incorporated under the old Corporation Law of the Philippines (Act 1459, as amended) on November 28, 1928 as Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company, following the merger of four telephone companies under common U.S. ownership. Under its Amended Articles of Incorporation, PLDT’s corporate term is currently limited through 2028.
PLDT’s original franchise was granted in 1928 and was last amended in 1991, extending its effectiveness until 2028 and broadening PLDT’s franchise to permit PLDT to provide virtually every type of telecommunications service. PLDT’s franchise covers the business of providing basic and enhanced telecommunications services in and between the provinces, cities and municipalities in the Philippines and between the Philippines and other countries and territories including mobile, wired or wireless telecommunications systems; fiber optics; multi-channel transmission distribution systems and their VAS (including but not limited to transmission of voice, data, facsimile, control signals, audio and video); information services bureau and all other telecommunications systems technologies presently available or that can be made available through technical advances or innovations in the future. Our subsidiaries, including Smart and DMPI, also maintain their own franchises with a different range of services and periods of legal effectiveness for their licenses.
Our principal executive offices are located at the Ramon Cojuangco Building, Makati Avenue, Makati City, Philippines and our telephone number is +(632) 816-8534. Our website address is www.pldt.com. The contents of our website are not a part of this annual report.
PCEV’s Sale of Receivables from Metro Pacific Investments Corporation, or MPIC
On March 2, 2018, PCEV entered into a Receivables Purchase Agreement, or RPA, with various financial institutions, or Purchasers, to sell a portion of its receivables from MPIC due in 2019 to 2021 amounting to Php5,550 million for a total consideration of Php4,852 million. The receivables consist of the partial proceeds from the sale of PCEV’s shares in Beacon to MPIC done in 2016 and 2017.
Under the terms of the RPA, the Purchasers will have exclusive ownership of the purchased receivables and all of its rights, title, and interest.
Agreement between PLDT and Smart and Amdocs
On January 24, 2018, PLDT and Smart entered into a seven-year, US$300 million Managed Transformation Agreement with Amdocs, a leading provider of software and services to communications and media companies, to upgrade PLDT’s business IT systems and improve its business processes and services, aimed at enhancing consumer satisfaction, reducing costs and generating increased revenues.
Transfer of Hastings PDRs to PLDT Beneficial Trust Fund
On January 22, 2018, ePLDT’s Board of Directors approved the assignment of the Hastings PDRs, representing 70% economic interest in Hastings Holdings, Inc., to the PLDT Beneficial Trust Fund for a total consideration of Php1,664 million. The assignment was completed on February 15, 2018 and ePLDT subsequently ceased to have any economic interest in Hastings.
PLDT’s subscription to Vega Telecom, Inc., VTI’s, new preferred shares
On December 15, 2017, PLDT and Globe each subscribed to 600,000 new preferred shares of the authorized capital stock of VTI, at a subscription price of Php5,000 per subscribed share (inclusive of a premium over par of Php4,000 per subscribed share), for a total subscription price of Php3,000 million (inclusive of a premium over par of Php2,400 million). PLDT and Globe each paid Php10 million in cash for the subscribed shares upon
20
execution of the agreement. The remaining balance of the subscription price was paid via conversion of advances amounting to Php2,990 million as at December 31, 2017.
Transfer of iCommerce to PLDT Online
On December 14, 2017, Voyager Innovations Holdings, Pte. Ltd., or VIH, and PLDT Online entered into a sale and purchase agreement wherein VIH sold all its 10,000 ordinary shares in iCommerce to PLDT Online for a total purchase price of SGD1.00. On the same date, VIH assigned its loans receivables from iCommerce to PLDT Online amounting to US$8.6 million. In consideration, PLDT Online paid VIH US$8.9 million inclusive of interest as at November 30, 2017.
Divestment of CURE
On October 26, 2011, PLDT received the Order issued by the NTC approving the application jointly filed by PLDT and Digitel for the sale and transfer of approximately 51.6% of the outstanding common stock of Digitel to PLDT. The approval of the application was subject to conditions which included the divestment by PLDT of CURE, in accordance with the Divestment Plan.
In a letter dated July 26, 2012, Smart informed the NTC that it has complied with the terms and conditions of the divestment plan as CURE had rearranged its assets, such that, except for assets necessary to pay off obligations due after June 30, 2012 and certain tax assets, CURE’s only remaining assets as at June 30, 2012 were its congressional franchise, the 10MHz of 3G frequency in the 2100 band and related permits.
In a letter dated September 10, 2012, Smart informed the NTC that the minimum Cost Recovery Amount, or CRA, to enable PLDT to recover its investment in CURE includes, among others, the total cost of equity investments in CURE, advances from Smart for operating requirements, advances from stockholders and associated funding costs. In a letter dated January 21, 2013, the NTC referred the computation of the CRA to the Commissioners of the NTC.
In a letter dated March 5, 2018, PLDT informed the NTC that it is waiving its right to recover any and all cost related to the 10MHz of 3G radio frequency previously assigned to CURE. Accordingly, CURE will not claim any cost associated with it in the event of subsequent assignment by the NTC to another qualified telecommunication company. With the foregoing, PLDT is deemed to have fully complied with its obligation to divest in CURE as a condition to the sale and transfer of DTPI shares to PLDT.
See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Divestment of CURE to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18 “Financial Statements” for further details.
PLDT’s investment in Trans-Pacific cable system
On October 30, 2017, PLDT announced that it is investing approximately Php7,000 million in the new Trans-Pacific cable system Jupiter to improve PLDT’s international cabling capacity and reinforce the resiliency of its undersea fiber links to the U.S. and Japan. This investment will include purchases by PLDT of complementary terminal equipment and other related facilities in the Philippines, Japan and the U.S.
Transformation Incentive Plan
On September 26, 2017, the Board of Directors of PLDT approved the Transformation Incentive Plan, or the TIP, which intends to provide incentive compensation to key officers, executives and other eligible participants who are consistent performers and contributors to the Company’s strategic and financial goals. The incentive compensation will be in the form of PLDT common shares of stock, or the Performance Shares, which will be released in three annual grants on the condition, among others, that pre-determined consolidated core net income targets are successfully achieved over three annual performance periods from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. See Note 26 – Employee Benefits to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further details.
Transfer of SBI’s Home Broadband Subscription Assets to PLDT
On September 26, 2017, the Board of Directors of PLDT and SBI, a PLDT subsidiary providing wireless broadband service, approved the sale and transfer of SBI’s trademark, subscribers (both individual and corporate) and all of SBI’s assets, rights and obligations directly or indirectly connected to its HOME Ultera and
21
HOMEBRO WiMAX businesses to PLDT. Subsequent to the transfer, SBI will continue to provide broadband services to its existing Canopy subscribers using a portion of Smart’s network.
Subscription of PLDT Online in iflix Convertible Note
On August 4, 2017, PLDT Online subscribed to a convertible note of iflix for US$1.5 million, or Php75.5 million, in a new funding round led by Hearst Entertainment. The convertible note was paid on August 8, 2017. The note is zero coupon, senior and unsubordinated, non-redeemable, transferable, and convertible into Series B Preferred Shares subject to occurrence of a conversion event. iflix will use the funds to invest in its local content strategy and for its regional and international expansion.
Sale of PCEV’s Remaining Beacon Shares to MPIC
On June 13, 2017, PCEV entered into a share purchase agreement with MPIC to sell its remaining 25% equity interest in Beacon for a total consideration of Php21,800 million. MPIC settled a portion of the consideration amounting to Php12,000 million upon closing and the balance of Php9,800 million will be paid in annual installments from June 2018 to June 2021. The unpaid balance from MPIC is measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation method, with interest income to be accreted over the term of the receivable.
After the sale of PCEV’s remaining 25% interest in Beacon, PCEV continues to hold its representation in the Board and participate in decision making. As set forth in the SPA: (i) the Seller shall be entitled to nominate one director to the Board of Directors of PCEV (“Seller’s Director”) and MPIC agrees to vote its shares in PCEV in favor of such Seller’s Director; and (ii) the Buyer shall cede to the Seller the right to vote all of the Shares (“Proxy Shares”). The parties agreed that with respect to decisions or policies affecting dividend payouts to be made by the Company, the Seller’s Director shall exercise its voting rights, and shall vote, in accordance with the recommendation of the Buyer on such matter. As a result, PCEV’s previously joint control over Beacon has become significant influence.
Sale of SPi Global by Asia Outsourcing Gamma Limited, or AOGL
On May 19, 2017, AOGL entered into a sale and purchase agreement with Partners Group, a global private markets investment manager, relating to the acquisition of SPi Global, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AOGL, for an enterprise value of US$330 million. The transaction was completed on August 25, 2017. As a result of the sale on various dates in 2017 and 2018, PGIC received a total cash distribution of US$57 million from Beta through redemption of a portion of its ordinary shares. AOGL is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Beta which is, in turn, owned 73.35% by CVC Capital Partners, one of the world’s leading private equity and investment advisory firms, and 18.32% by PLDT through its indirect subsidiary, PGIC.
For more information relating to the (1) DOLE Compliance Order to PLDT, see Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies; (2) Petition against the Philippine Competition Commission, see Note 10 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures; and (3) Wilson Gamboa and Jose M. Roy III Petition, see Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies, to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
As at December 31, 2017, our business activities were categorized into three business units: Wireless, Fixed Line and Others.
We monitor the operating results of each business unit separately for purposes of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.
Wireless
While our legacy business of voice and SMS still provides the majority of our revenues, data, whether mobile internet (accessed via the mobile phone) or broadband (accessed via dongles and other similar devices), is the focus area of our business today. We generate data revenues from across all segments of our wireless business.
We provide (a) mobile services, (b) home broadband services, (c) digital platforms and mobile financial services, and (d) MVNO and other services, through our wireless business, which contributed approximately 95%, 3% and
22
(collectively for digital platforms and mobile financial services, and MVNO and other services) 2%, respectively, of our wireless service revenues in 2017. Mobile data usage has surged in the past several years while voice and SMS usage has slowed down. Wireless revenues contributed 59% of our total revenues in 2017 as compared to 64% and 68% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our mobile service revenues, were 90%, 92% and 91% of our total wireless revenues in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Our mobile services, which accounted for approximately 95% of our wireless service revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017, are provided through Smart and DMPI with 58,293,908 total subscribers as at December 31, 2017 as compared to 62,763,209 total subscribers as at December 31, 2016, and 68,612,118 total subscribers as at December 31, 2015, representing a combined market share of approximately 49%, 50% and 55% as at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our mobile revenue market share has been eroding by the combined impact of aggressive price competition, the ongoing upgrade of our mobile network and the consequent loss of subscriber market share. This was exacerbated by a larger proportion of legacy revenues from SMS and international voice relative to competition, that offset growth in our mobile data revenues. Moreover, mobile penetration in the Philippines decreased to approximately 118% in 2017 from 124% in 2016, and account for approximately 29 and 34 times the country's fixed line penetration in 2017 and 2016, respectively, although the existence of subscribers owning multiple SIM cards results in this penetration rate being inflated to a certain extent.
As at December 31, 2017, approximately 96% of our mobile subscribers were prepaid service subscribers. The predominance of prepaid service reflects one of the distinguishing characteristics of the Philippine mobile market, allowing us to reduce billing and administrative costs on a per-subscriber basis, as well as to control credit risk.
The continued growth of internet usage by smartphone and broadband dongle users resulted in significant increase in our mobile data revenues. As a result, our mobile internet revenues, which are part of our mobile data service revenues, increased by Php2,919 million, or 17%, to Php20,086 million in 2017 from Php17,167 million in 2016. Our mobile internet revenues contributed 76% and 67% of our mobile data service revenues in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Conversely, mobile broadband revenues, which are derived from the use of dongles and other similar mobile broadband devices, decreased by Php2,117 million, or 26%, to Php6,030 million.
Smart’s and DMPI’s wireless network provides extensive coverage in the Philippines, covering substantially all of Metropolitan Manila and most of the other major population centers in the Philippines. Our low spectrum band resources (700MHz, 850MHz and 900MHz) are primarily used to provide coverage whilst higher spectrum bands (1800MHz, 2100MHz, etc.) provide additional capacity. Our network supports HSPA+ (for 3G) and LTE-Advanced.
Fixed Line
We are the leading provider of fixed line telecommunications services throughout the Philippines, servicing retail, corporate and SME clients. Our fixed line business group offers voice, data and miscellaneous services. We had 2,663,210 fixed line subscribers as at December 31, 2017, an increase of 224,737, or 9%, from 2,438,473 fixed line subscribers as at December 31, 2016, mainly due to higher net additions in 2017 compared with 2016. Revenues from our fixed line business were 49%, 44% and 40% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. International voice revenues have been declining largely due to a drop in call volumes as a result of the availability of alternative calling options and OTT services. An increase in our data service revenues in recent years has mitigated such decline to a certain extent. Recognizing the growth potential of data services, we have put considerable emphasis on the development of new data-capable and IP-based networks.
Our 13,070-kilometer long DFON is complemented by an extensive digital microwave backbone network operated by Smart. This microwave network complements the higher capacity fiber optic networks and is vital in delivering reliable services to areas not covered by fixed terrestrial transport network. Our fixed line network reaches all of the major cities and municipalities in the Philippines, with a concentration in the Metropolitan Manila area. Our network offers the country’s most extensive connections to international networks through two international gateway switching exchanges and various regional submarine cable systems in which we have economic interests.
See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Infrastructure – Fixed Line Network Infrastructure” for further information on our fixed line infrastructure.
23
Our other business in 2017 consisted primarily of PCEV, an investment holding company, which owns an 8.74% effective interest in Meralco as at December 31, 2016 through its 25% equity interest in Beacon, until the full divestment of Beacon shares to MPIC on June 13, 2017. PLDT Global Investments Corporation, or PGIC, which owns an 18.32% economic interest in Beta, an investment holding company of SPi Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries, or SPi Group, where we reinvested approximately US$40 million of the proceeds from the sale of BPO in 2013; and PLDT Digital Investments Pte. Ltd., or PLDT Digital, an investment holding company, which owns a 6.1% equity interest in Rocket, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, PLDT Online.
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Plans” for capital expenditures planned for 2018 and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and Capital Resources” for information concerning our principal capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
With the exception of the sale of 112.71 million common shares, comprising approximately a 10% equity interest, in Meralco to MPIC, there were no material divestitures in 2015.
On May 30, 2016, the PLDT Board approved the Company’s acquisition of 50% equity interest, including outstanding advances and assumed liabilities, in the entities that own the telecommunications business of SMC with Globe acquiring the remaining 50% interest. See Item 10. “Additional Information – Material Contracts” for further information.
On May 30, 2016, PCEV sold common and preferred stock of Beacon, representing approximately 25% equity interest in Beacon to MPIC for a total consideration of Php26,200 million.
On May 19, 2017, AOGL entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Partners Group, relating to the acquisition of SPi Global for an enterprise value of US$330 million. The transaction was completed on August 25, 2017.
On June 13, 2017, PCEV entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with MPIC to sell its remaining 25% equity interest in Beacon, consisting of 646 million shares of common stock and 458 million shares of preferred stock, for a total consideration of Php21,800 million.
See Item 4. “Recent Developments” for further information.
See Exhibit 8. “List of Subsidiaries” for a listing of PLDT’s significant subsidiaries, including name, country of incorporation, proportion of ownership interests and, where different, proportion of voting power held.
We believe our business is characterized by the following competitive strengths:
|
• |
Recognized Brands. PLDT, Smart, TNT and Sun are widely recognized brand names in the Philippines. We have built the PLDT brand name for almost 90 years as the leading telecommunications provider in the Philippines. Smart is recognized in the Philippines as an innovative provider of high-quality mobile services. The TNT brand, which is provided using Smart’s network, has also gained significant recognition as a price-competitive brand. Since its launch in 2003, Sun has built considerable brand equity as a provider of “unlimited” services. Having a range of strong and recognizable brands allows us to offer to various market segments differentiated products and services that suit customers’ budgets and usage preferences. |
|
• |
Leading Market Shares. We have maintained our position as a market leader in fixed line and broadband markets in the Philippines in terms of both subscribers and revenues. |
24
|
and other mobile services), home broadband, digital platforms and mobile financial services, and MVNO and other services. Revenues from mobile voice and SMS have been declining over the past several years, but this decline has been partly mitigated by the increase in revenues from data services, particularly mobile internet and mobile broadband services. Our fixed line business derives service revenues from voice (local exchange, international and domestic services), data and miscellaneous services. Revenues from international and domestic fixed line services have been declining over the past several years due to pressures on traditional fixed line voice revenues as a result of the popularity of OTT service providers, but have been offset by the significant revenue contributions from our home broadband, corporate data and leased lines, and data center and IT services, as well as higher revenues from our local exchange service. |
|
• |
Superior Integrated Network. With the most extensive telecommunications networks in the Philippines, we are able to offer a wide array of communications services. Part of our network transformation program included the continued upgrade of our fixed line network to an all IP-based NGN, the build-out of our transmission and FTTH network, the investment in increased international bandwidth capacity, and the expansion of our 3G, 4G LTE and wireless broadband networks in order to enhance our data and broadband capabilities. Our network investments include the upgrade of our IT capabilities which are essential in enabling us to offer more relevant services to our customers. |
|
• |
Innovative Products and Services. Voyager Innovations, Inc. or Voyager, (including through its affiliates PayMaya Philippines, Fintqnologies Corporation, or FINTQ, and Takatack Technologies Pte. Ltd. or Takatack Technologies) is the digital innovations arm of PLDT and Smart. Voyager creates and launches platforms, services and solutions for emerging markets in the areas of digital financial services, access including sponsored data, data-in-sachets and messaging, e-Commerce platforms, digital marketing solutions, and the incubation of other new technologies. Through PayMaya and FINTQ, the Voyager Group offers various digital financial services and financial technology solutions. |
|
• |
Strong Strategic Relationships. We have important strategic relationships with First Pacific, NTT DOCOMO and NTT Communications. We believe the technological support, international experience and management expertise made available to us through these strategic relationships will enable us to enhance our market leadership and provide/cross-sell a wider range of products and services. |
The key elements of our business strategy are:
|
• |
Build on our strong positions in the fixed line and wireless businesses. We plan to continue building on our position as one of the leading fixed line and wireless service providers in the Philippines by continuing to launch new products and services to increase subscriber value and utilization of our existing facilities and equipment at reduced cost, and to increase our subscribers’ use of our network for both voice and data, as well as their reliance on our services. |
|