0001193125-17-142270.txt : 20170427 0001193125-17-142270.hdr.sgml : 20170427 20170427141911 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-17-142270 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 20-F PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 14 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20161231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20170427 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20170427 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PLDT Inc. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000078150 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIO TELEPHONE) [4813] IRS NUMBER: 000000000 FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 20-F SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-03006 FILM NUMBER: 17788050 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: RAMON CONJUANGCO BLDG STREET 2: MAKATI AVE CITY: MAKATI METRO MANILA STATE: R6 ZIP: 0721 BUSINESS PHONE: 0116328168553 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: RAMON CONJUANGCO BLDG STREET 2: MAKATI AVE CITY: MAKATI METRO MANILA STATE: R6 ZIP: 0721 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19940303 20-F 1 d383547d20f.htm FORM 20-F FORM 20-F
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 20-F

 

      REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 – For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

OR

 

      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 – For the transition period from                 to                 

OR

 

      SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 – Date of event requiring this shell company report                     

Commission file number 1-03006

PLDT Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Republic of the Philippines

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Ramon Cojuangco Building

Makati Avenue

Makati City, Philippines

(Address of principal executive offices)

Atty. Ma. Lourdes C. Rausa-Chan, telephone: +(632) 816-8556; lrchan@pldt.com.ph;

Ramon Cojuangco Bldg., Makati Avenue, Makati City, Philippines

(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of Company contact person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

 

Title of each class

      

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Capital Stock, Par Value Five Philippine Pesos Per Share      New York Stock Exchange*
American Depositary Shares, evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, each representing one share of Common Capital Stock      New York Stock Exchange

 

* Registered on the New York Stock Exchange not for trading but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, pursuant to the requirements of such stock exchange.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

 

8.350% Notes due March 2017

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as at the close of the period covered by the annual report.

 

As at December 31, 2016:
216,055,775 shares of Common Capital Stock, Par Value Five Philippine Pesos Per Share
300,001,240 shares of Non-voting Preferred Stock, Par Value Ten Philippine Pesos Per Share
150,000,000 shares of Voting Preferred Stock, Par Value One Philippine Peso Per Share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:  Yes  ☒  No  ☐

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:  Yes  ☒  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (of for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  ☐  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ☒        Accelerated filer  ☐        Non-accelerated filer  ☐        Emerging growth company  ☐        

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards1 provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP  ☐      International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board  ☒
  

Other  ☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.  Item 17  ☐   Item 18  ☐

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

 

1  The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

CERTAIN CONVENTIONS AND TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT

     3  

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     4  

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     4  

PART I

     5  

        Item 1.

 

Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

     5  

        Item 2.

 

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

     5  

        Item 3.

 

Key Information

     5  
 

Performance Indicators

     5  
 

Selected Financial Data

     6  
 

Capital Stock

     6  
 

Dividends Declared

     7  
 

Dividends Paid

     7  
 

Exchange Rates

     7  
 

Capitalization and Indebtedness

     8  
 

Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

     8  
 

Risk Factors

     8  

        Item 4.

 

Information on the Company

     16  
 

Overview

     16  
 

Historical Background and Development

     16  
 

Recent Developments

     17  
 

Business Overview

     22  
 

Capital Expenditures and Divestitures

     23  
 

Organization

     24  
 

Strengths

     24  
 

Strategy

     24  
 

Business

     25  
 

Infrastructure

     34  
 

Interconnection Agreements

     36  
 

Licenses and Regulations

     37  
 

Material Effects of Regulation on our Business

     37  
 

Competition

     39  
 

Environmental Matters

     41  
 

Intellectual Property Rights

     41  
 

Properties

     41  

        Item 4A.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

     42  

        Item 5.

 

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

     42  
 

Overview

     42  
 

Management’s Financial Review

     42  
 

Critical Accounting Policies

     43  
 

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations to Existing Standards Effective Subsequent to December 31, 2016

     48  
 

Results of Operations

     48  
 

Plans

     73  
 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     74  
 

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

     78  

        Item 6.

 

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

     79  
 

Directors and Executive Officers

     79  
 

Terms of Office

     85  
 

Family Relationships

     85  
 

Compensation of Key Management Personnel

     85  
 

Long-term Incentive Plan

     86  
 

Share Ownership

     87  
 

Board Practices

     87  
 

Audit, Governance and Nomination, Executive Compensation and Technology Strategy Committees

     87  
 

Employees and Labor Relations

     89  
 

Pension and Retirement Benefits

     90  

        Item 7.

 

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

     90  
 

Related Party Transactions

     91  

        Item 8.

 

Financial Information

     92  
 

Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information

     92  
 

Legal Proceedings

     92  
 

Dividend Distribution Policy

     92  

        Item 9.

 

The Offer and Listing

     92  
 

Common Capital Stock and American Depositary Shares

     92  

        Item 10.

 

Additional Information

     93  
 

Share Capital

     93  
 

Amended Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws

     93  
 

Issuance and Redemption of Preferred Stock

     93  

 

i


Table of Contents
 

Material Contracts

     94  
 

Exchange Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Securities Holders

     94  
 

Taxation

     95  
 

Documents on Display

     98  

        Item 11.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

     98  

        Item 12.

 

Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

     98  

PART II

     99  

        Item 13.

 

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

     99  

        Item 14.

 

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

     99  

        Item 15.

 

Controls and Procedures

     99  

        Item 16A.

 

Audit Committee Financial Expert

     100  

        Item 16B.

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

     100  

        Item 16C.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     100  

        Item 16D.

 

Exemption from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

     101  

        Item 16E.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchaser

     101  

        Item 16F.

 

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

     101  

        Item 16G.

 

Corporate Governance

     101  

        Item 16H.

 

Mine Safety Disclosure

     102  

PART III

     102  

        Item 17.

 

Financial Statements

     102  

        Item 18.

 

Financial Statements

     102  

        Item 19.

 

Exhibits

     254  

EXHIBIT INDEX

     256  

CERTIFICATION

  

 

ii


Table of Contents

CERTAIN CONVENTIONS AND TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT

Unless the context indicates or otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our” or “PLDT Group” mean PLDT Inc. (formerly Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company) and its consolidated subsidiaries, and references to “PLDT” or “the Company” mean PLDT Inc., excluding its consolidated subsidiaries (see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for a list of these subsidiaries, including a description of their respective principal business activities).

Any discrepancies in any table between totals and the sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding.

All references to the “Philippines” contained in this report mean the Republic of the Philippines and all references to the “U.S.” or the “United States” are to the United States of America.

In this report, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, all references to “pesos,” “Philippine pesos” or “Php” are to the lawful currency of the Philippines, all references to “dollars,” “U.S. dollars” or “US$” are to the lawful currency of the United States and all references to “Japanese yen,” “JP¥” or “¥” are to the lawful currency of Japan. Unless otherwise indicated, conversion of peso amounts into U.S. dollars in this report were made based on the volume weighted average exchange rate quoted through the Philippine Dealing System, which was Php49.77 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2016. On April 25, 2017, the volume weighted average exchange rate quoted was Php49.71 to US$1.00.

In this annual report, each reference to:

 

   

ARPU means average revenue per user;

 

   

BIR means Bureau of Internal Revenue;

 

   

BSP means Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas;

 

   

BTS means base transceiver station;

 

   

CMTS means cellular mobile telephone system;

 

   

CPCN means Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity;

 

   

DFON means domestic fiber optic network;

 

   

Digitel means Digital Telecommunications Phils., Inc.;

 

   

DMPI means Digitel Mobile Philippines, Inc.;

 

   

DSL means digital subscriber line;

 

   

First Pacific means First Pacific Company Limited;

 

   

First Pacific Group means First Pacific and its Philippine affiliates;

 

   

FP Parties means First Pacific and certain Philippine affiliates and wholly-owned non-Philippine subsidiary;

 

   

FTTH means Fiber-to-the-HOME;

 

   

GSM means global system for mobile communications;

 

   

HSPA means high-speed packet access;

 

   

IFRS means International Financial Reporting Standards;

 

   

IGF means international gateway facility;

 

   

IP means internet protocol;

 

   

IT means information technology;

 

   

LEC means local exchange carrier;

 

   

LTE means long-term evolution;

 

   

MVNO means mobile virtual network operations;

 

   

NGN means Next Generation Network;

 

   

NTC means the National Telecommunications Commission of the Philippines;

 

   

NTT means Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation;

 

   

NTT Communications means NTT Communications Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NTT;

 

   

NTT DOCOMO means NTT DOCOMO, Inc., a majority-owned and publicly traded subsidiary of NTT;

 

   

PAPTELCO means Philippine Association of Private Telephone Companies, Inc.;

 

   

PCEV means PLDT Communications and Energy Ventures, Inc.

 

3


Table of Contents
   

PDRs means Philippine Depositary Receipts;

 

   

Philippine SEC means the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission;

 

   

PLDT Beneficial Trust Fund means the beneficial trust fund created by PLDT to pay the benefits under the PLDT Employees’ Benefit Plan;

 

   

PLP means PLDT Landline Plus;

 

   

PSE means the Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc.;

 

   

SIM means Subscriber Identification Module;

 

   

Smart means Smart Communications, Inc.;

 

   

U.S. SEC means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;

 

   

VAS means Value-Added Service;

 

   

VoIP means Voice over Internet Protocol;

 

   

VPN means virtual private network;

 

   

W-CDMA means Wideband-Code Division Multiple Access; and

 

   

WiMAX means Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some information in this report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current beliefs, expectations and intentions as to facts, actions and events that will or may occur in the future. Such statements are generally identified by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “will” or other similar words.

A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from information contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including, without limitation, the risk factors set forth in Item 3. “Key Information – Risk Factors.” When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the description of risks and other cautionary statements in this report.

You should also keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made by us in this report or elsewhere speaks only as at the date on which we made it. New risks and uncertainties come up from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. We have no duty to, and do not intend to, update or revise the statements in this report after the date hereof. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should keep in mind that actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statement made in this report or elsewhere.

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Our consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, included in Item 18. “Financial Statements” of this annual report on Form 20-F have been prepared in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS.

As at December 31, 2016, our business activities were categorized into three business units: Wireless, Fixed Line and Others.

 

4


Table of Contents

PART I

 

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

Not applicable.

 

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

 

Item 3. Key Information

Performance Indicators

We use a number of non-GAAP performance indicators to monitor financial performance. These are summarized below and discussed later in this report.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is measured as net income excluding depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangible assets, asset impairment on noncurrent assets, financing costs, interest income, equity share in net earnings (losses) of associates and joint ventures, foreign exchange gains (losses) – net, gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments – net, provision for (benefit from) income tax and other income (expenses) – net. Adjusted EBITDA is monitored by the management for each business unit separately for purposes of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because our management believes that it is widely used by investors in their analysis of the performance of PLDT and can assist them in their comparison of PLDT’s performance with those of other companies in the technology, media and telecommunications sector. We also present Adjusted EBITDA because it is used by some investors as a way to measure a company’s ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures and meet working capital requirements. Companies in the technology, media and telecommunications sector have historically reported Adjusted EBITDA as a supplement to financial measures in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our performance, nor should Adjusted EBITDA be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or as an alternative to any other measure determined in accordance with IFRS. Unlike net income, Adjusted EBITDA does not include depreciation and amortization or financing costs and, therefore, does not reflect current or future capital expenditures or the cost of capital. We compensate for these limitations by using Adjusted EBITDA as only one of several comparative tools, together with IFRS-based measurements, to assist in the evaluation of operating performance. Such IFRS-based measurements include income before income tax, net income, and operating, investing and financing cash flows. We have significant uses of cash flows, including capital expenditures, interest payments, debt principal repayments, taxes and other non-recurring charges, which are not reflected in Adjusted EBITDA. Our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may be different from the calculation methods used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. A reconciliation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to our consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is presented in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects –– Management’s Financial Review” and Note 4 –– Operating Segment Information to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Core Income

Core income is measured as net income attributable to equity holders of PLDT (net income less net income attributable to non-controlling interests), excluding foreign exchange gains (losses) – net, gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments – net (excluding hedge costs), asset impairment on noncurrent assets, nonrecurring gains (losses), net of tax effect of aforementioned adjustments, as applicable, and similar adjustments to equity share in net earnings (losses) of associates and joint ventures. Core income results are monitored by the management for each business unit separately for purposes of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Also, core income is used by the management as a basis for determining the level of dividend payouts to shareholders and a basis for granting incentives to employees. Core income should not be considered as an alternative to income before income tax or net income determined in accordance with IFRS as an indicator of our performance. Unlike income before income tax, core income does not include foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses on derivative financial instruments, asset impairments and nonrecurring gains and losses. We compensate for these limitations by using core income as only one of several comparative tools, together with IFRS-based measurements, to assist in the evaluation of operating performance. Such IFRS-based measurements include income before income tax and net income. Our calculation of core income may be different from the calculation methods used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. A reconciliation of our consolidated core income to our consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is presented in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Management’s Financial Review” and Note 4 – Operating Segment Information to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

 

5


Table of Contents

Selected Financial Data

The selected consolidated financial information below as at December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and for the financial years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements, and the accompanying notes, included elsewhere in Item 18. “Financial Statements” of this annual report on Form 20-F. As disclosed under “Presentation of Financial Information,” our consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared and presented in conformity with IFRS.

 

     2016(1)     2016     2015     2014     2013     2012  
     (in millions, except earnings per common share amounts, weighted average number of common shares,
ratio of earnings to fixed charges and dividends declared per common share amounts)
 

Statements of Operations Data:

            

Revenues

   US$ 3,321       Php165,262       Php171,103       Php170,835       Php168,211       Php162,914  

Service revenues

     3,159       157,210       162,930       164,943       163,932       159,619  

Non-service revenues

     162       8,052       8,173       5,892       4,279       3,295  

Expenses

     2,824       140,559       139,268       130,457       125,514       122,529  

Net income for the year

     405       20,162       22,075       34,090       35,453       36,099  

Continuing operations

     405       20,162       22,075       34,090       33,384       35,556  

Discontinued operations

     —         —         —         —         2,069       543  

Earnings per common share for the year attributable to equity holders of PLDT

            

Basic

     1.86       92.33       101.85       157.51       163.67       167.07  

Diluted

     1.86       92.33       101.85       157.51       163.67       167.07  

Earnings per common share from continuing operations for the year attributable to equity holders of PLDT

            

Basic

     1.86       92.33       101.85       157.51       154.09       164.55  

Diluted

     1.86       92.33       101.85       157.51       154.09       164.55  

Balance Sheets Data

            

Cash and cash equivalents

     778       38,722       46,455       26,659       31,905       37,161  

Total assets

     9,546       475,119       455,095       436,295       399,638       405,815  

Net assets

     2,181       108,537       113,898       134,668       137,326       145,734  

Total long-term debt – net of current portion

     3,049       151,759       143,982       115,399       88,924       102,811  

Total debt(2)

     3,718       185,032       160,892       130,123       104,090       115,792  

Total liabilities

     7,366       366,582       341,197       301,627       262,312       260,081  

Total equity attributable to equity holders of PLDT

     2,173       108,175       113,608       134,364       137,147       145,550  

Weighted average number of common shares for the year (in thousands)

     4,341       216,056       216,056       216,056       216,056       216,055  

Other Data:

            

Depreciation and amortization

     692       34,455       31,519       31,379       30,304       32,354  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(3)

     3.1x       3.1x       4.0x       6.4x       5.7x       5.4x  

Net cash provided by operating activities

     984       48,976       69,744       66,015       73,763       80,370  

Net cash used in investing activities

     (844     (41,982     (39,238     (51,686     (21,045     (39,058

Net cash used in financing activities

     (308     (15,341     (11,385     (19,897     (59,813     (48,628

Dividends declared to common shareholders

     460       22,902       32,841       39,970       37,809       36,946  

Dividends declared per common share

     2.13       106.00       152.00       185.00       175.00       171.00  

 

(1)      

   We maintain our accounts in Philippine pesos, the functional and presentation currency under IFRS. For convenience, the Philippine peso financial information as at and for the year ended December 31, 2016, has been converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of Php49.77 to US$1.00, the rate quoted through the Philippine Dealing System as at December 31, 2016. This conversion should not be construed as a representation that the Philippine peso amounts represent, or have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at that rate or any other rate.

(2)       

   Total debt represents the sum of (i) current portion of long-term debt; (ii) long-term debt – net of current portion; and (iii) notes payable.

(3)      

  

For purposes of this ratio, “Earnings” consist of: (a) pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustment for noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries or income or loss from equity investees; (b) fixed charges; (c) amortization of capitalized interest;(d) distributed income of equity investees; and (e) share of pre-tax losses of equity investees for which charges arising from guarantees are included in fixed charges; less the sum of the following: (1) capitalized interest; (2) preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries; and (3) the noncontrolling interests in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges.

 

“Fixed charges” consist of interest expense and capitalized interest, amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness, an estimate of interest within rental expense, and preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries.

Capital Stock

The following table summarizes PLDT’s capital stock issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

     No. of shares      December 31,  
     2016      2015      2016      2015  
     (in millions)  

Non-Voting Preferred Stock

           

10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock II and JJ*

     —          —        Php      Php  

Series IV Cumulative Non-convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock**

     300        300        360        360  

Voting Preferred Stock

     150        150        150        150  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     450        450        510        510  

Common Stock

     216        216        1,093        1,093  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     666        666      Php 1,603      Php 1,603  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

* On June 8, 2015, the Company issued 870 shares of Series JJ 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, which are currently outstanding. In April 2011, the Company issued 370 shares of Series II 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, all of which were redeemed by May 11, 2016.
** Includes 300,000,000 shares subscribed for Php3,000,000,000, of which Php360,000,000 has been paid.

 

6


Table of Contents

Dividends Declared

The following table shows the dividends declared to common shareholders from the earnings for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016:

 

     Date     Amount  

Earnings

   Approved      Record      Payable     Per share      Total Declared  
                                (in millions)  

2014

     August 5, 2014        August 28, 2014        September 26, 2014       Php69        Php14,908  

2014

     March 3, 2015        March 17, 2015        April 16, 2015       61        13,179  

2014

     March 3, 2015        March 17, 2015        April 16, 2015       26        5,618  
          

 

 

    

 

 

 
             156        33,705  
          

 

 

    

 

 

 

2015

     August 4, 2015        August 27, 2015        September 25, 2015(1)       65        14,044  

2015

     February 29, 2016        March 14, 2016        April 1, 2016       57        12,315  
          

 

 

    

 

 

 
             122        26,359  
          

 

 

    

 

 

 

2016

     August 2, 2016        August 16, 2016        September 1, 2016       49        10,587  

2016

     March 7, 2017        March 21, 2017        April 6, 2017       28        6,050  
          

 

 

    

 

 

 
             Php77        Php16,637  
          

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)

Payment was moved to September 28, 2015 in view of Proclamation No. 1128, Series of 2015, dated September 15, 2015 declaring September 25, 2015 as a regular holiday.

Dividends Paid

The following table shows a summary of dividends paid per share of PLDT’s common stock stated in both Philippine peso and U.S. dollars:

 

     In Philippine Peso      In U.S. Dollars  

2012

     171.00        4.04  

Regular Dividend – April 20, 2012

     63.00        1.48  

Regular Dividend – September 28, 2012

     60.00        1.44  

Special Dividend – April 20, 2012

     48.00        1.12  

2013

     175.00        4.16  

Regular Dividend – April 18, 2013

     60.00        1.45  

Regular Dividend – September 27, 2013

     63.00        1.45  

Special Dividend – April 18, 2013

     52.00        1.26  

2014

     185.00        4.14  

Regular Dividend – April 16, 2014

     62.00        1.39  

Regular Dividend – September 26, 2014

     69.00        1.54  

Special Dividend – April 16, 2014

     54.00        1.21  

2015

     152.00        3.35  

Regular Dividend – April 16, 2015

     61.00        1.37  

Regular Dividend – September 25, 2015(1)

     65.00        1.39  

Special Dividend – April 16, 2015

     26.00        0.59  

2016

     106.00        2.29  

Regular Dividend – April 1, 2016

     57.00        1.24  

Regular Dividend – September 1, 2016

     49.00        1.05  

 

(1)

Payment was moved to September 28, 2015 in view of Proclamation No. 1128, Series of 2015, dated September 15, 2015 declaring September 25, 2015 as a regular holiday.

Dividends on PLDT’s common stock were declared and paid in Philippine pesos. For the convenience of the reader, the Philippine peso dividends have been converted into U.S. dollars based on the Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate on the respective dates of dividend payments. See Note 20 – Equity to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further information on our dividend payments.

Exchange Rates

The Philippine government does not administratively fix the exchange rate between the Philippine peso and the U.S. dollar. Since August 1, 1992, a market average rate, known as the Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate, has been determined daily in inter-bank trading using the Philippine Dealing System. The Philippine Dealing System is a specialized off-floor direct dealing service for the trading of Philippine pesos-U.S. dollars by member banks of the Bankers Association of the Philippines, or the BAP, and BSP, the central bank of the Philippines. All members of the BAP are required to make their Philippine peso-U.S. dollar trades through this system, which was established by Telerate Financial Information Network of Hong Kong.

 

7


Table of Contents

The following table shows the exchange rates between the Philippine peso and the U.S. dollar, expressed in Philippine pesos per U.S. dollar, for the periods indicated, based on the volume-weighted average exchange rate for each business day in each of the periods presented:

 

     Year Ended December 31,
     Period End      Average(1)      High(2)      Low(3)

2012

     Php41.08        Php42.14        Php40.86      Php44.25

2013

     44.40        42.66        40.57      44.66

2014

     44.74        44.45        43.64      44.87

2015

     47.12        45.62        44.08      47.44

2016

     49.77        47.67        49.61      49.98

2017 (through April 25, 2017)

     49.71        49.99        49.47      50.38

 

Source: Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate

 

(1) 

Calculated by using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.

(2) 

Highest exchange rate for the period.

(3) 

Lowest exchange rate for the period.

 

     Month  
     Period End      Average(1)      High(2)      Low(3)  

2016

           

September

     Php48.48        Php47.52        Php46.55        Php48.48  

October

     48.49        48.35        48.04        48.58  

November

     49.75        49.22        48.34        49.97  

December

     49.77        49.82        49.61        49.98  

2017

           

January

     49.76        49.74        49.47        49.95  

February

     50.26        49.99        49.67        50.31  

March

     50.22        50.27        50.15        50.38  

April (through April 25, 2017)

     49.71        49.85        49.53        50.12  

 

Source: Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate

 

(1) 

Calculated by using the average of the exchange rates during the month.

(2) 

Highest exchange rate for the month.

(3) 

Lowest exchange rate for the month.

This report contains conversions of Philippine peso amounts into U.S. dollars for your convenience. Unless otherwise specified, these conversions were made at the Philippine Dealing System Reference Rate as at December 31, 2016 of Php49.77 to US$1.00. You should not assume that such Philippine peso amounts represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated, or at any particular rate. As at April 25, 2017, the exchange rate quoted through the Philippine Dealing System was Php49.71 to US$1.00. Unless otherwise specified, the weighted average exchange rate of the Philippine peso to the U.S. dollar for a given year used in the following discussions in this report was calculated using the average of the daily exchange rates quoted through the Philippine Dealing System during the year.

Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider all of the information in this annual report, including the risks and uncertainties described below. If any of the following risks actually occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and the trading price of our ADSs could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Relating to Us

If we are not able to adapt to changes and disruptions in technology and by over-the-top, or OTT, services and address changing consumer demand on a timely basis, we may experience a decline in the demand for our services, be unable to implement our business strategy and experience a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

The rapid change of technology and proliferation of OTT services have the potential to disrupt our business. Our major sources of revenue have always been short messaging service, or SMS, voice and international calling services. However, due to the adoption of new technologies and the growing popularity of these new OTT services, our traditional revenue sources have continued to decline, and we cannot assure you that this trend will not continue with respect to some of our traditional revenue sources.

 

8


Table of Contents

The continued high mobile penetration rate in the Philippines and the prevalence of SMS have negatively impacted our domestic calling service in recent years. Moreover, net settlement payments between PLDT and other foreign telecommunications carriers for origination and termination of international call traffic between the Philippines and other countries, which have been our predominant source of foreign currency revenues, have been declining in recent years. The emergence of OTT services, such as social networking, instant messaging and internet telephone, also known as VoIP services, are competing with us in voice or data services and continue to affect our business model. We are also facing growing competition from providers offering services using alternative wireless technologies and IP-based networks, including efforts by the Philippine government to roll-out its free WiFi services to various municipalities in the country.

Our capital costs could increase as we phase out outdated and unprofitable technologies and invest in new ones. We may not be able to accurately predict technological trends or the success of new services in the market. In addition, there could be legal or regulatory restraints on our introduction of new services. If our services fail to gain acceptance in the marketplace, or if costs associated with implementation and completion of the introduction of these services materially increase, our ability to retain and attract customers could be adversely affected. We can neither assure you that we would be able to adopt or successfully implement new technologies and services nor assure you that future technological changes will not adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Competition from other telecommunications services providers may further increase, which may reduce our market share and decrease our profit margin, and we cannot assure you that any potential change in the competitive landscape of the telecommunications industry in the Philippines would not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Increasing competition among existing telecommunications services providers, as well as competition from new competitors, could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects by, among other factors, forcing us to lower our tariffs, reducing or reversing the growth of our customer base and reducing usage of our services. Competition in the mobile telecommunications industry is particularly intense, with network coverage, quality of service, product offerings, and price dictating subscriber preference. Vital capacity expansion may continue to adversely increase our capital expenditures. Recently, operators have grown more aggressive in maintaining and growing market share, especially in light of a maturing market. Our principal mobile competitor, Globe Telecom, Inc., or Globe, has introduced aggressive marketing campaigns and promotions, such as unlimited voice, SMS, and data offers. Furthermore, the possible entry of a new player, due to the liberalization of the Philippine telecommunications industry, may threaten our market share.

Taking into consideration these risks, we cannot assure you that the number of providers of telecommunications services will not increase in the future or that competition for customers will not cause our mobile and fixed line subscribers to switch to other operators, or otherwise cause us to increase our marketing expenditures, potential loss of customers or reduce our rates, resulting in a reduction in our profitability.

Our ability to compete effectively will depend on, among other things, network coverage, quality of service, price, our development of new and enhanced products and services, the reach and quality of our sales and distribution channels and our capital resources. It will also depend on how successfully we anticipate and respond to various factors affecting our industry, including new technologies and business models, changes in consumer preferences and demand for existing services, demographic trends and economic conditions. If we are not able to respond successfully to these competitive challenges, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

The mobile telecommunications industry in the Philippines may not continue to grow.

The majority of our total revenues are currently derived from the provision of mobile and broadband services to customers in the Philippines. As a result, we depend on the continued development and growth of this industry in the Philippines. The mobile penetration rate in the country, however, has already reached an estimated 126% as at December 31, 2016, and thus the industry may well be considered mature, although the existence of subscribers owning multiple SIM cards results in this penetration rate being inflated to a certain extent. Further growth of the market depends on many factors beyond our control, including the continued introduction of new and enhanced mobile devices, the price levels of mobile handsets, consumer tastes and preferences, and the amount of disposable income of existing and potential subscribers. Any economic, technological or other developments resulting in a reduction in demand for mobile services or otherwise causing the Philippine mobile telecommunications industry to stop growing or reducing the rate of its growth, could materially harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

The licenses, franchises and regulatory approvals, upon which PLDT relies, may be subject to revocation or delay, which could result in the suspension of our services or abandonment of any planned expansions and could thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Failure to comply with the foreign ownership restrictions

Section 11, Article XII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution provides that no franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations of associations organized under the laws of the Philippines, at least 60% of whose capital is owned by such citizens. We believe that as of the date of this report, PLDT is in compliance with the requirement of Section 11 Article XII of the 1987 Constitution. Exceeding the foreign ownership restrictions imposed under the Philippine Constitution may subject the Company to financial sanctions or the Philippine government commencing a quo warranto case in the name of the Republic of the Philippines against the Company to revoke the Company’s franchise that permits the Company to engage in telecommunications activities.

 

9


Table of Contents

We believe that as of the date of this report, PLDT is in compliance with the requirements of the Constitution, and this position was recently supported by the Supreme Court; however, we cannot assure you that subsequent changes in law or additional litigation would not result in a different conclusion. See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Recent Developments – In the Matter of the Wilson Gamboa Case and Jose M. Roy III Petition” and Item 8. “Financial Information – Legal Proceedings” and Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies – In the Matter of the Wilson Gamboa Case and Jose M. Roy III Petition to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

Failure to renew CPCNs

We operate our business under franchises, each of which is subject to amendment, termination or repeal by the Philippine Congress, and to various provisional authorities and CPCNs, which have been granted by the NTC and will expire between now and 2028. Some of our CPCNs and provisional authorities have already expired. Although we have filed applications for extension of these CPCNs and provisional authorities, we cannot assure you that the NTC will grant the applications for renewal. See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Licenses and Regulations” for more information.

Failure to comply with R.A. 7925

The Philippine Congress may revoke, or the Solicitor General of the Philippines may file a case against DMPI to revoke, the franchise of DMPI for its failure to comply with R.A. 7925, which requires making a public offering of at least 30% of the aggregate common shares of a telecommunications entity with regulated types of services. See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Material Effects of Regulation on our Business” for further discussion.

Failure to properly divest CURE

If we fail to effect the divestment of Connectivity Unlimited Resource Enterprise, or CURE, in accordance with the terms of, or in a manner contemplated under the NTC’s approval of our acquisition of the Digitel Group, the NTC may revoke its approval of our acquisition which could significantly disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Divestment of CURE to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

We cannot assure you that any of our franchises, permits or licenses will not be revoked and any such revocation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions or prospects.

Our business is significantly affected by governmental laws and regulations, including regulations in respect of rates and taxes and laws relating to anti-competitive practices and monopoly.

The NTC regulates the rates we are permitted to charge for services that have not yet been deregulated, such as local exchange services. We cannot assure you that the NTC will not impose additional obligations on us that could lead to the revocation of our licenses if not adhered to and/or to the reduction in our total revenues or profitability. The NTC could adopt changes to the regulations or implement additional guidelines governing our interconnection with other telecommunications companies or the rates and terms upon which we provide services to our customers. The occurrence of any of these changes could materially reduce our revenues and profitability.

The PLDT Group is also subject to a number of national and local taxes. We cannot assure you that the PLDT Group will not be subject to new, increased and/or additional taxes and that the PLDT Group would be able to impose or pass on additional charges or fees on its customers to compensate for the imposition of such taxes or charges, or for the loss of fees and/or charges.

Moreover, we are subject to laws and regulations relating to anti-competitive practices and anti-monopoly. The Philippine Competition Act came into effect on August 8, 2015 and prohibits practices that restrict market competition through anti-competitive agreements and abuse of a dominant position. It also requires parties to provide notification and obtain clearance for certain mergers and acquisitions. The Philippine Competition Act prescribes administrative and criminal penalties for violations of these prohibitions. Finally, the Philippine Competition Act established the Philippines Competition Commission with responsibility for implementing and enforcing competition policy in the Philippines. While our business practices have not in the past been found to have violated any laws and regulations related to anti-competition and anti-monopoly, we cannot assure you that any new or existing governmental regulators will not, in the future, find our business practices to have an anti-competitive effect on the Philippines telecommunications industry, nor can we assure you that we will not be found to have violated the relevant laws and regulations relating to anti-competition and anti-monopoly in the future. In particular, PLDT is currently engaged in litigation with the Philippine Competition Commission, or the PCC, relating to the SMC Transactions, described in Item 4. “Information on the Company – Recent Developments – Investments of PLDT in Vega Telecom, Inc., or VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare”, and whether the parties thereto completed the SMC Transactions in accordance with the The Philippine Competition Act and circulars issued thereunder.

Any future expansion in our services, particularly in our mobile services, could subject us to additional conditions in the granting of our provisional authorities by the NTC and to increased regulatory scrutiny, which could harm our reputation and business, and which could have a material adverse effect on our growth and prospects. In addition, the occurrence of any such event could impose substantial costs or cause interruptions or considerable delays in the provision, development or expansion of our services. See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Recent Developments – Notice of Transaction filed with the Philippine Competition Commission, “– Material Effects of Regulation on our Business” and Note 10 – Investments in Associates and Joint VenturesNotice of Transaction filed with the Philippine Competition Commission, or PCC to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

 

10


Table of Contents

Changes in regulations or user concerns regarding privacy and protection of user data, or any failure to comply with such laws, could adversely affect our business.

Legislation such as R.A. 10173 (Data Privacy Act of 2012) and its Implementing Rules and Regulations recognizes as a policy of the State to protect the fundamental human right of privacy, of communication while ensuring free flow of information to promote innovation and growth. The rules apply to the processing of personal data by any natural and juridical person in the government or private sector. They also apply to an act done or practice engaged in and outside of the Philippines under certain conditions. Likewise, NTC issuances under Memorandum Circular, or MC, No. 05-07-2016 deals with the rights of the subscriber on record as to the data supplied by him and NTC MC No. 05-06-2007 deals with Call Data Records and under what circumstances could they be obtained. The regulatory environment regarding privacy and data protection laws is unsettled.

Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to make effective modifications to our policies, or to comply with any privacy, data-retention or data-protection-related laws, regulations, orders or industry self-regulatory principles could result in proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others, a loss of user confidence, damage to the PLDT brands, and a loss of users or advertising partners, any of which could potentially have an adverse effect on our business.

In addition, various federal, state and foreign legislative or regulatory bodies may enact new or additional laws and regulations concerning privacy, data-retention and data-protection issues, including laws or regulations mandating disclosure to domestic or international law enforcement bodies, which could adversely impact our business, our brand or our reputation with users. The interpretation and application of privacy, data protection and data retention laws and regulations are often uncertain and in flux. These laws may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and inconsistently with our current policies and practices, complicating long-range business planning decisions. If privacy, data protection or data retention laws are interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our current policies and practices we may be fined or ordered to change our business practices in a manner that adversely impacts our operating results. Complying with these varying international requirements could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices or operating platforms in a manner adverse to our business.

Inadequate handling of confidential information, including personal customer information by our corporate group, contractors and others, may adversely affect our credibility or corporate image.

We possess a substantial amount of personal information of our customers. In the event an information leak occurs, we might be subjected to penalties under the data privacy law, our credibility and corporate image may be significantly damaged, and we may experience an increase in cancellations of customer contracts and slower increase in additional subscriptions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Legislation and regulation of online payment systems could create unexpected costs, subject us to enforcement actions for compliance failures, or cause us to change our digital technology platforms or business models.

Regulators have been increasing their focus on online and mobile payment services, and recent regulatory and other developments could reduce the convenience or utility of our payment services for users. Governmental regulation of certain aspects of mobile payments systems under which PLDT operates could result in obligations or restrictions with respect to the types of products that we may offer to consumers, the payment card systems that link to our mobile payments systems, the jurisdictions in which our payment services or apps may be used, and higher costs, such as fees charged by banks to process funds through our mobile payments systems. Such obligations and restrictions could be further increased as more jurisdictions regulate payment systems. Moreover, if this regulation is used to provide resources or preferential treatment or protection to selected payments and processing providers, it could displace us from, or prevent us from entering into, or substantially restrict us from participating in, particular geographies.

Limitations in the amount of frequency spectrum or facilities made available to us could negatively affect our ability to maintain and improve our service quality and level of customer satisfaction, could increase our costs and could reduce our competitiveness.

The available radio frequency spectrum is one of the principal limitations on a wireless network’s capacity, and there are limitations in the spectrum and facilities available to us to provide our services. Our future wireless growth will increasingly depend on our ability to offer innovative video and data services and a wireless network that has sufficient spectrum and capacity to support these innovations. Improvements in our service depend on many factors, including continued access to and deployment of adequate spectrum.

 

11


Table of Contents

Our competitiveness may decline if we cannot obtain the necessary or optimal allocation of spectrum from the Philippine government. If the Philippine government does not fairly allocate spectrum to wireless providers in general or if we cannot acquire needed spectrum or deploy the services customers desire on a timely basis without burdensome conditions or at adequate cost while maintaining network quality levels, then our ability to attract and retain customers, and therefore maintain and improve our operating margins, could be materially adversely affected.

Other mobile service providers in the world may not adopt or use the technologies and the frequency bands that are compatible with ours, which could affect our ability to sufficiently offer international services.

If a sufficient number of mobile service providers do not adopt the technologies and the frequency bands that are compatible with ours, if mobile service providers switch to other technologies or frequency bands, or if there is a delay in the introduction and expansion of compatible technologies and frequency bands, we may not be able to offer international roaming or other international services as expected, and our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We may not be successful in our acquisitions of, and investments in, other companies and businesses, and may therefore be unable to fully implement our business strategy.

As growth slows or reverses in our traditional fixed line and mobile businesses, and as part of our strategy to grow other business segments, we make acquisitions and investments in companies or businesses to enter new businesses or defend our existing markets. The success of our acquisitions and investments depends on a number of factors, such as:

 

   

our ability to identify suitable opportunities for investment or acquisition;

 

   

our ability to reach an acquisition or investment agreement on terms that are satisfactory to us or at all;

 

   

the extent to which we are able to influence or exercise control over the acquired company;

 

   

the compatability of the economic, business or other strategic objectives and goals of the acquired company with those of the PLDT Group, as well as the ability to execute the identified strategies in order to generate fair returns on the investment; and

 

   

our ability to successfully integrate the acquired company or business with our existing businesses.

Any of our contemplated acquisitions and investments may not be consummated due to reasons or factors beyond our control. Even if any contemplated acquisitions and investments are consummated, we may not be able to realize any or all of the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions and investments and we cannot assure you that the consummation of such acquisitions and investments will not result in losses for a prolonged period of time. Moreover, if we are unsuccessful in our contemplated acquisitions and investments, we may not be able to fully implement our business strategy to maintain or grow certain of our businesses and our results of operations and financial position could be materially and adversely affected.

We are exposed to the fluctuations in the market values of our investments.

Given the nature of our business and our foray into the digital business, we have made investments in various start-up companies. In 2014, we invested in Rocket Internet SE (formerly Rocket Internet AG), or Rocket, to drive the development of online and mobile payment solutions, the fair value of which has declined significantly since our investment. Due to the significant decline in fair value of our investment in Rocket as at December 31, 2015, we recognized an impairment of the investment in Rocket amounting to Php5,124 million. In 2016, we recognized additional impairment loss of Php5,381 million as the fair value of Rocket further declined to Php9,206 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. On December 31, 2016, we recognized an unrealized gain of Php852 million in our consolidated other comprehensive income in the “Net gains (losses) on available-for-sale financial investments” account due to slight recovery of Rocket’s fair value to Php10,058 million as at December 31, 2016. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 11 – Available-for-Sale Financial Investments – PLDT Online’s Investment in Rocket to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for more information. Credit ratings and market values of this investment and similar investments can be negatively impacted by liquidity, credit deterioration or losses, financial results, foreign exchange rates, or other factors. As a result, our investments could decline and result in a material impairment, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

If we are unable to install and maintain telecommunications facilities and equipment in a timely manner, we may not be able to maintain our current market share and the quality of our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business requires the regular installation of new, and the maintenance of existing, telecommunications transmission and other facilities and equipment, which are being undertaken. The installation and maintenance of these facilities and equipment are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, such as:

 

   

shortages of equipment, materials and labor;

 

   

work stoppages and labor disputes;

 

   

interruptions resulting from inclement weather and other natural disasters;

 

   

unforeseen engineering, environmental and geological problems; and

 

   

unanticipated cost increases.

 

12


Table of Contents

Any of these factors could give rise to delays or cost overruns in the installation of new facilities or equipment or could prevent us from deploying our networks and properly maintaining the equipment used in our networks, and hence could affect our ability to maintain existing services and roll-out new services, for example, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Actual or perceived health risks or other problems relating to mobile handsets or transmission masts could lead to litigation or decreased mobile communications usage.

The effects of, and any damage caused by, exposure to an electromagnetic field remain the subject of careful evaluations by the international scientific community. We cannot rule out that exposure to electromagnetic fields or other emissions originating from mobile handsets will not be identified as a health risk in the future. Our mobile business may be harmed as a result of any future alleged, or actual, health risk or the perception of any health risk, which could result in a lower number of customers, reduced usage per customer or even potential consumer liability.

Cyber attacks, theft, equipment failures, natural disasters, terrorist acts and territorial disputes may materially adversely affect our operations

Cyber attacks, theft of telecommunication cables, major equipment failures or natural disasters, including severe weather, terrorist acts or other breaches of network or IT security that affect our wireline and wireless networks, including telephone switching offices, microwave links, third-party-owned local and long-distance networks on which we rely, our cell sites or other equipment, our customer account support and information systems, or employee and business records could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

In order to minimize our exposure to cyber security risks, we have deployed a multi-layered defense mechanism from the network to the host and up to the application level. However, we can neither assure you that any of such defenses will be effective against or neutralize the effects of any cyber incidents resulting from unintentional cyber security breaches or deliberate attacks on our network infrastructure or computer systems, nor assure you that our business will not be significantly disrupted in the event of such security breach or attack. If we fail to timely and effectively prevent the occurrence of any new or existing cyber security incidents, or fail to promptly rectify any such incidents, our business could be significantly disrupted, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, and the confidence of our stakeholders could be lost.

The Philippines, China and several Southeast Asian nations have been engaged in a series of long-standing territorial disputes over certain islands in the West Philippine Sea, also known as the South China Sea. Should these territorial disputes continue or escalate further, the Philippines and its economy may be disrupted and our operations could be adversely affected as a result. In particular, further disputes between the Philippines and China may lead both countries to impose trade restrictions on the other’s imports. Any such impact from these disputes could adversely affect the Philippine economy, and materially and adversely affect our business, financial position and financial performance.

Our businesses require substantial capital investment, which we may not be able to finance.

Our projects under development and the continued maintenance and improvement of our networks and services, including Smart’s projects, networks, platforms and services, require substantial ongoing capital investment. Our consolidated capital expenditures totaled Php42,825 million, Php43,175 million and Php34,759 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We currently estimate that our consolidated capital expenditures in 2017 will be approximately Php46 billion.

Future strategic initiatives could require us to incur significant additional capital expenditures. We may be required to finance a portion of our future capital expenditures from external financing sources, some of which have not yet been fully arranged. There can be no assurance that financing for new projects will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot complete our development programs or other capital projects on time due to our failure to obtain the required financing, our growth, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Our results of operations and our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the Philippine peso significantly fluctuates against the U.S. dollar.

A portion of our indebtedness and related interest expense, a substantial portion of our capital expenditures and a portion of our operating expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars and other foreign currencies, whereas most of our revenues are denominated in Philippine pesos. See Note 21 – Interest-bearing Financial Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

A depreciation of the Philippine peso against the U.S. dollar would increase the amount of our U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations, capital expenditures, and operating and interest expenses in Philippine peso terms. In the event that the Philippine peso depreciates against the U.S. dollar, we may be unable to generate enough funds through operations and other means to offset the resulting increase in our obligations in Philippine peso terms. Moreover, a depreciation of the Philippine peso against the U.S. dollar may result in our recognition of significant foreign exchange losses, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. A depreciation of the Philippine peso could also cause us not to be in compliance with the financial covenants imposed on us by our lenders under certain loan agreements and other indebtedness. Further, fluctuations in the Philippine peso value and of interest rates impact the mark-to-market gains/losses of certain of our financial debt instruments, which were designated as non-hedged items.

 

13


Table of Contents

The Philippine peso has been subject to significant depreciation in recent years with the Philippine peso depreciated by approximately 15% from a high of Php41.08 for year end 2012 to Php47.12 as at December 31, 2015 and further depreciated by 6% to Php49.77 as at December 31, 2016. We cannot assure you that the Philippine peso will not depreciate further and be subject to significant fluctuations going forward, due to a range of factors, including:

 

   

political and economic developments affecting the Philippines, including the level of remittances from overseas Filipino workers;

 

   

global economic and financial trends;

 

   

the volatility of emerging market currencies;

 

   

any interest rate increases by the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States; and

 

   

higher demand for U.S. dollars by both banks and domestic businesses to service their maturing U.S. dollar obligations or foreign exchange traders including banks covering their short U.S. dollar positions, among others.

Our debt instruments contain restrictive covenants which require us to maintain certain financial tests and our indebtedness could impair our ability to fulfill our financial obligations and service our other debt.

Our existing debt instruments contain covenants which, among other things, require PLDT to maintain certain financial ratios and other financial tests, calculated on the basis of IFRS at relevant measurement dates, principally at the end of each quarter period. For a description of some of these covenants, see Note 21 – Interest-bearing Financial Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Our indebtedness and the requirements and limitations imposed by our debt covenants could have important consequences. For example, we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to payments on our indebtedness, which could reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements.

The principal factors that could negatively affect our ability to comply with the financial ratio covenants and other financial tests under our debt instruments are depreciation of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar, poor operating performance of PLDT and our consolidated subsidiaries, impairment or similar charges in respect of investments or other long-lived assets that may be recognized by PLDT and its consolidated subsidiaries, and increases in our interest expenses. Of our total consolidated debts, approximately 31% and 42% were denominated in U.S. dollars as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Considering our consolidated hedges and U.S. dollar cash balances allocated for debt, the unhedged portion of the consolidated debt amounts were approximately 8% and 17% as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and therefore these financial ratios and other tests are expected to be negatively affected by any weakening of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar.

If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations or comply with our debt covenants, we could be forced to restructure or refinance our indebtedness, seek additional equity capital or sell assets. An inability to effect these measures successfully could result in a declaration of default and an acceleration of maturities of some or all of our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our subsidiaries could be limited in their ability to pay dividends to us due to internal cash requirements and their creditors having superior claims over their assets and cash flows, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition.

A majority of our total revenues and cash flows from operations are derived from our subsidiaries, particularly Smart. Smart has significant internal cash requirements for debt service, capital expenditures and operating expenses and as a result, may be financially unable to pay any dividends to PLDT. Although Smart has been making dividend payments to PLDT regularly since December 2002, there can be no assurance that PLDT will continue to receive these dividends or other distributions, or otherwise be able to derive liquidity from Smart or any other subsidiary or investee in the future.

Creditors of our subsidiaries generally have priority claims over our subsidiaries’ assets and cash flows. We and our creditors will effectively be subordinated to the existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, of our subsidiaries, except that we may be recognized as a creditor with respect to loans we have made to subsidiaries. If we are recognized as a creditor of a subsidiary, our claim will still be subordinated to any indebtedness secured by assets of the subsidiary and any indebtedness of the subsidiary otherwise deemed superior to the indebtedness we hold.

We may have difficulty meeting our debt payment obligations if we do not continue to receive cash dividends from our subsidiaries and our financial condition could be materially and adversely affected as a result.

A significant number of shares of PLDT’s voting stock are held by four shareholders, which may not act in the interests of other shareholders or stakeholders in PLDT.

As at January 31, 2017, the First Pacific Group and its Philippine affiliates, NTT Communications and NTT DOCOMO, and JG Summit Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates, or JG Summit Group, collectively, beneficially own approximately 53.93% in PLDT’s outstanding common stock (representing 31.83% of our overall voting stock). See Item 7. “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions” for further details regarding the shareholdings of NTT Communications and NTT DOCOMO in PLDT, and the rights granted pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, Strategic Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement.

 

14


Table of Contents

Additionally, all of PLDT’s shares of voting preferred stock, which represent approximately 41% of PLDT’s total outstanding shares of voting stock are owned by a single stockholder, BTF Holdings, Inc., or BTFHI.

The FP Parties and/or NTT Communications and/or NTT DOCOMO and/or JG Summit Group and/or BTFHI may exercise their respective voting rights over these decisions and transactions in a manner that could be contrary to the interests of other shareholders or stakeholders in PLDT.

Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could adversely impact investor confidence and the market price of our common shares and ADSs, and have a material adverse effect on our business, our reputation, financial condition and results of operations.

We are required to comply with various Philippine and U.S. laws and regulations on internal control. However, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Therefore, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, including our failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results could be harmed, we could fail to meet our reporting obligations and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, our reputation, financial condition and results of operations, and the market prices of our common shares and ADSs could decline significantly.

We are unionized and are vulnerable to work stoppages, slowdowns or increased labour costs.

As at December 31, 2016, PLDT has three employee unions, representing in the aggregate 5,631, or 31%, of the employees of the PLDT Group. This unionized workforce could result in demands that may increase our operating expenses and adversely affect our profitability. For instance, PLDT experienced a significant charge from its manpower rightsizing program, MRP, in 2015, mainly incurred in the fixed-line business, with some of the charge incurred in the wireless business. See Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Compensation and Employee Benefits to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”. Each of our different employee groups may require separate collective bargaining agreements. If any group of our employees and PLDT are unable to reach agreement on the terms of their collective bargaining agreement or we were to experience widespread employee dissatisfaction, we could be subject to work slowdowns or stoppages. Any of these events would be disruptive to our operations and could harm our business.

The loss of key personnel or the failure to attract and retain highly qualified personnel could compromise our ability to effectively manage our business and pursue our growth strategy.

Our future performance depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified key technical, development, sales, services and management personnel. The loss of key employees could result in significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of replacement personnel could be costly and time consuming, could cause additional disruptions to our business, and could be unsuccessful. We cannot guarantee the continued employment of any of the members of our senior leadership team, who may depart our Company for any number of reasons, such as other business opportunities, differing views on our strategic direction or other personal reasons. Any inability to attract, retain or motivate our personnel could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and prospects.

Adverse results of any pending or future litigation and/or disputes may impact PLDT’s cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

We are currently involved in various legal proceedings. Our estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims have been developed in consultation with our counsel handling the defense in these matters and is based upon our analysis of potential results. Our future financial performance could be materially affected by an adverse outcome or by changes in our estimates or effectiveness of our strategies relating to these proceedings and assessments.

For more information on PLDT’s legal proceedings, see Item 8. “Financial Information – Legal Proceedings” and Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies to the accompanying consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements.” While PLDT believes the positions it has taken in these cases are legally valid, the final results of these cases may prove to be different from its expectations. In addition, there is no assurance that PLDT will not be involved in future litigation or other disputes, the results of which may materially and adversely impact its business and financial conditions.

Risks Relating to the Philippines

PLDT’s business may be adversely affected by political or social or economic instability in the Philippines.

The Philippines is subject to political, social and economic volatility that, directly or indirectly, could have a material adverse impact on our ability to sustain our business and growth.

We cannot assure you that the political environment in the Philippines will be stable or that the current or any future government will adopt economic policies that are conducive to sustained economic growth or which do not materially and adversely impact the current regulatory environment for the telecommunications and other companies.

 

15


Table of Contents

If foreign exchange controls were to be imposed, our ability to meet our foreign currency payment obligations could be adversely affected.

The Philippine government has, in the past, instituted restrictions on the conversion of the Philippine peso into foreign currencies and the use of foreign exchange received by Philippine companies to pay foreign currency-denominated obligations. The Monetary Board of the BSP has statutory authority, with the approval of the President of the Philippines, during a foreign exchange crisis or in times of national emergency, to:

 

   

suspend temporarily or restrict sales of foreign exchange;

 

   

require licensing of foreign exchange transactions; or

 

   

require the delivery of foreign exchange to the BSP or its designee banks.

We cannot assure you that foreign exchange controls will not be imposed in the future. If imposed, these restrictions could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain foreign currency to service our foreign currency obligations.

As a foreign private issuer, we follow certain home country corporate governance practices which may afford less protection to holders of our ADSs.

As a foreign private issuer incorporated in the Philippines and listed on the PSE, we are permitted under applicable NYSE rules to follow certain home country corporate governance practices. The corporate governance practice and requirements in the Philippines do not require us to have a majority of the members of our board of directors to be independent, and do not require regularly scheduled executive sessions of non-management directors or regularly scheduled executive sessions where only independent directors are present. Further, the criteria for independence of directors and audit committee members applicable in the Philippines differ from those applicable under the NYSE rules. These Philippine home country corporate governance practices may afford less protection to holders of our ADSs.

The credit ratings of the Philippines may restrict the access to capital of Philippine companies, including PLDT.

Historically, the Philippines’ sovereign debt has been rated non-investment grade by international credit rating agencies. Although during 2016, the Philippines’ long-term foreign currency-denominated debt was affirmed by Fitch as investment-grade with a rating of BBB+ but with a revised outlook to negative, and Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s affirmed the Philippines’ long-term foreign currency-denominated debt to the investment-grade rating of BBB+ and Baa2, respectively, with a stable outlook, the continued relatively low sovereign ratings of the Philippine Government will directly and adversely affect companies domiciled in the Philippines as international credit rating agencies issue credit ratings by reference to that of the sovereign. No assurance can be given that Fitch, Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or any other international credit rating agency will not downgrade the credit ratings of the Philippine Government in the future and, therefore, Philippine companies, including PLDT. Any such downgrade could have a material adverse impact on the liquidity in the Philippine financial markets, the ability of the Philippine Government and Philippine companies, including PLDT, to raise additional financing, and the interest rates and other commercial terms at which such additional financing is available.

 

Item 4. Information on the Company

Overview

We are one of the leading telecommunications service providers in the fixed line, wireless and broadband markets in the Philippines, in terms of both subscribers and revenues. Through our three principal business segments (Wireless, Fixed Line and Others), we offer a large and diverse range of telecommunications services across the Philippines’ most extensive fiber optic backbone and wireless and fixed line networks.

We are the leading fixed line service provider in the Philippines accounting for approximately 65% of the total reported fixed line subscribers nationwide as at December 31, 2016. Smart and DMPI, the PLDT Group’s mobile service providers, collectively account for approximately 50% of the total reported mobile subscribers nationwide as at December 31, 2016.

Our common shares are listed and traded on the PSE and our ADSs are listed and traded on the NYSE in the United States.

We had a market capitalization of approximately Php294,916 million, or US$5,926 million, as at December 31, 2016, representing one of the largest market capitalizations among Philippine-listed companies. We had total revenues of Php165,262 million, or US$3,321 million, and net income attributable to equity holders of PLDT of Php20,006 million, or US$402 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Historical Background and Development

PLDT was incorporated under the old Corporation Law of the Philippines (Act 1459, as amended) on November 28, 1928 as Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company, following the merger of four telephone companies under common U.S. ownership. Under its Amended Articles of Incorporation, PLDT’s corporate term is currently limited through 2028.

PLDT’s original franchise was granted in 1928 and was last amended in 1991, extending its effectiveness until 2028 and broadening PLDT’s franchise to permit PLDT to provide virtually every type of telecommunications service. PLDT’s franchise covers the business of providing basic and enhanced telecommunications services in and between the provinces, cities and municipalities in the Philippines and between the Philippines and other countries and territories including mobile, wired or wireless telecommunications systems; fiber optics; multi-channel transmission distribution systems and their VAS (including but not limited to transmission of voice, data, facsimile, control signals, audio and video); information services bureau and all other telecommunications systems technologies presently available or that can be made available through technical advances or innovations in the future. Our subsidiaries, including Smart and DMPI, also maintain their own franchises with a different range of services and periods of legal effectiveness for their licenses.

 

16


Table of Contents

Our principal executive offices are located at the Ramon Cojuangco Building, Makati Avenue, Makati City, Philippines and our telephone number is +(632) 816-8534. Our website address is www.pldt.com. The contents of our website are not a part of this annual report.

Recent Developments

Extension of Smart’s Congressional Franchise

On March 27, 1992, Philippine Congress granted the legislative franchise to Smart under Republic Act (R.A.) No. 7294 to establish, install, maintain, lease and operate integrated telecommunications, computer, electronic services, and stations throughout the Philippines for public domestic and international telecommunications, and for other purposes. R.A. 7294 became law on April 15, 1992, which was 15 days from date of publication in at least 2 newspapers of general circulation in the Philippines.

On January 16, 2017, the House of Representatives approved House Bill No. 4637, seeking to extend for another 25 years the franchise granted to Smart. The same House Bill was approved on Third Reading by the Senate on March 13, 2017. The bill was signed by the Senate President, and submitted to the Presidential Legislative Liaison Office of the House of Representatives on March 23, 2017. Thereafter, the President could have approved, vetoed, or taken no action on the bill for a period of 30 days, the expiration of which fell on April 22, 2017.

As provided under Article VI, Section 27 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, “The President shall communicate his veto of any bill to the House where it originated within 30 days after the date of receipt thereof; otherwise, it shall become a law as if he had signed it.” As of the date of this filing, the President has not communicated any approval nor veto of the bill.

Php2,610 Million and Php1,590 Million Perpetual Notes

Smart issued Php2,610 million and Php1,590 million perpetual notes under two Notes Facility Agreements dated March 3, 2017 and March 6, 2017, respectively. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes are intended to finance capital expenditures. The notes have no fixed redemption date and Smart may, at its sole option, redeem the notes in whole but not in part. In accordance with IAS 32, the notes are classified as part of equity in the financial statements of Smart. The notes are subordinated to and rank junior to all senior loans of Smart.

Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation of PLDT

On April 12, 2016 and June 14, 2016, the Board of Directors and stockholders of PLDT, respectively, approved the following actions: (i) change in the name of the Company from Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company to PLDT Inc.; (ii) expansion of the purpose clause to expressly provide for such other purposes and powers incidental to or in furtherance of the primary purpose, including the power to do or engage in such activities required, necessary or expedient in the pursuit of lawful businesses or for the protection or benefit of the Company; and (iii) corresponding amendments to the First Article and Second Article of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company.

On July 29, 2016, the Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Company containing the aforementioned amendments was approved by the Philippine SEC.

Amendments to the By-Laws of PLDT

On August 30, 2016, the Board of Directors, exercising its own power, and the authority duly delegated to it by the stockholders of PLDT to amend the By-Laws, authorized and approved the following amendments: (i) change in the name of the Company from Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company to PLDT Inc. both in the heading and Section 1, Article XV of the By-Laws; and (ii) change in the logo of the Company as stated in Section 1, Article XV of the By-Laws from desk telephone to the current triangle-shaped logo of the corporation.

On November 14, 2016, the Amended By-Laws of the Company containing the aforementioned amendments was approved by the Philippine SEC.

In the Matter of the Wilson Gamboa Case and Jose M. Roy III Petition

The Supreme Court, in a Decision dated November 22, 2016, dismissed the petitions filed by Jose M. Roy III and other petitioners-in-intervention against Philippine SEC Chairperson, Teresita Herbosa (the “Decision”). The Decision upheld the validity of the Philippine SEC Guidelines MC No. 8, which requires public utility corporations to maintain at least 60% Filipino ownership in both its “total number of outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote in the election of directors” and its “total number of outstanding shares of stock, whether or not entitled to vote in the election of directors” and declared the same to be compliant with the Court’s ruling in the Gamboa Case. Consequently, the Court ruled that MC No. 8 cannot be said to have been issued with grave abuse of discretion.

In the course of discussing the petitions, the Supreme Court expressly rejected petitioners’ argument that the 60% Filipino ownership requirement for public utilities must be applied to each class of shares. According to the Court, the position is “simply beyond the literal text and contemplation of Section 11, Article XII of the 1987 Constitution” and the petitioners’ suggestion would “effectively and unwarrantedly amend or change” the Court’s ruling in the Gamboa Case. In categorically rejecting the petitioners’ claim, the Court declared and stressed that its Gamboa ruling “did NOT make any definitive ruling that the 60% Filipino ownership requirement was intended to apply to each class of shares.” On the contrary, according to the Court, “nowhere in the discussion of the term “capital” in Section 11, Article XII of the 1987 Constitution in the Gamboa Decision did the Court mention the 60% Filipino equity requirement to be applied to each class of shares.”

 

17


Table of Contents

In respect of ensuring Filipino ownership and control of public utilities, the Court noted that this is already achieved by the requirements under MC No. 8. According to the Court, “since Filipinos own at least 60% of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote directors, which is what the Constitution precisely requires, then the Filipino stockholders control the corporation – i.e., they dictate corporate actions and decisions…”

The Court further noted that the application of the Filipino ownership requirement as proposed by petitioners “fails to understand and appreciate the nature and features of stocks and financial instruments” and would “greatly erode” a corporation’s “access to capital – which a stock corporation may need for expansion, debt relief/repayment, working capital requirement and other corporate pursuits.” The Court reaffirmed that “stock corporations are allowed to create shares of different classes with varying features” and that this “is a flexibility that is granted, among others, for the corporation to attract and generate capital (funds) from both local and foreign capital markets” and that “this access to capital – which a stock corporation may need for expansion, debt relief/prepayment, working capital requirement and other corporate pursuits – will be greatly eroded with further unwarranted limitations that are not articulated in the Constitution.” The Court added that “the intricacies and delicate balance between debt instruments (liabilities) and equity (capital) that stock corporations need to calibrate to fund their business requirements and achieve their financial targets are better left to the judgment of their boards and officers, whose bounden duty is to steer their companies to financial stability and profitability and who are ultimately answerable to their shareholders.”

The Court went on to say that “too restrictive definition of ‘capital’, one that was never contemplated in the Gamboa Decision, will surely have a dampening effect on the business milieu by eroding the flexibility inherent in the issuance of preferred shares with varying terms and conditions. Consequently, the rights and prerogatives of the owners of the corporation will be unwarrantedly stymied.” Accordingly, the Court said that the petitioners’ “restrictive interpretation of the term “capital” would have a tremendous (adverse) impact on the country as a whole – and to all Filipinos.”

See Item 8. “Financial Information – Legal Proceedings” and Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies – In the Matter of the Wilson Gamboa Case and Jose M. Roy III Petition to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

Transfer of DMPI’s Sun Postpaid Mobile and Broadband Subscription Assets to Smart

On August 1, 2016, the Board of Directors of Smart and DMPI approved the sale/transfer of DMPI’s trademark and subscribers (both individual and corporate) including all of DMPI’s assets, rights and obligations directly or indirectly connected to its postpaid mobile and broadband operations. The transfer is in accordance with the integration of the wireless business to simplify business operations, as well as to provide flexibility in offering bundled/converged products and enhanced customer experience. The transfer was completed on November 1, 2016, after which only the prepaid mobile business remains with DMPI.

Sale of Customer Relationship Management business by Asia Outsourcing Gamma Limited, or AOGL

On July 22, 2016, AOGL entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement, or SPA, with Relia Inc., one of the largest business process outsourcing, or BPO, companies in Japan, to sell SPi CRM, Inc. and Infocom Technologies, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of SPi Technologies, Inc., which own AOGL’s Customer Relationship Management business, to Relia for an enterprise value of US$181 million. AOGL is the holding company of SPi Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Asia Outsourcing Beta Limited, or Beta, which is, in turn, owned 73.29% by CVC Capital Partners, one of the world’s leading private equity and investment advisory firms, and 18.32% by PLDT through its indirect subsidiary, PLDT Global Investments Corporation, or PGIC. The transaction was completed on September 30, 2016. As a result of the sale, PGIC received a cash distribution of US$11.2 million from Beta through redemption of its preferred shares and portion of its ordinary shares. The economic interest of PGIC in Beta remained at 18.32% as at December 31, 2016.

See Note 10 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Associates – Investment of PGIC in Beta to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

Sale of PCEV’s Beacon Electric Asset Holdings, Inc., or Beacon, Shares to Metro Pacific Investment Corporation, or MPIC

On May 30, 2016, PCEV entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with MPIC to sell its 646 million shares of common stock and 458 million shares of preferred stock of Beacon, representing approximately 25% equity interest in Beacon, to MPIC for a total consideration of Php26,200 million. MPIC settled a portion of the consideration amounting to Php17,000 million immediately upon signing of the agreement and the balance of Php9,200 million will be paid in annual installments until June 2020. Consequently, PCEV realized a portion of the deferred gain amounting to Php4,962 million. After the sale, PCEV’s equity ownership in Beacon was reduced from 50% to 25% while MPIC’s interest increased to 75%. MPIC agreed that for as long as: (i) PCEV owns at least 20% of the outstanding capital stock of Beacon; or (ii) the purchase price has not been fully paid by MPIC, PCEV shall retain the right to vote 50% of the outstanding capital stock of Beacon.

PCEV’s effective interest in Manila Electric Company, or Meralco, through Beacon, was reduced to 8.74% as at December 31, 2016 from 17.48% as at December 31, 2015, while MPIC’s effective interest in Meralco, through its direct ownership in Meralco shares and through Beacon, increased to 41.22% as at December 31, 2016 from 32.48% as at December 31, 2015. There is no change in the aggregate joint interest of MPIC and Beacon in Meralco which remains at 49.96% as at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

18


Table of Contents

Beacon owns 394 million Meralco common shares, representing approximately 34.96% effective ownership in Meralco with a carrying value of Php84,815 million and market value of Php104,426 million based on quoted price of Php265 per share as at December 31, 2016.

PCEV’s Additional Investment in Beacon Class “B” Preferred Shares

On May 30, 2016, the Board of Directors of Beacon approved the increase in authorized capital stock of Beacon from 5,000 million to 6,000 million shares divided into 3,000 million common shares with a par value of Php1.00 per share, 2,000 million Class “A” preferred shares with a par value of Php1.00 per share and 1,000 million new Class “B” preferred shares with a par value of Php1.00 per share.

On the same date, PCEV subscribed to 277 million Beacon Class “B” preferred shares for a total cash consideration of Php3,500 million. MPIC likewise subscribed to 277 million Beacon Class “B” preferred shares for a total cash consideration of Php3,500 million.

The amount raised from the subscription was used to fund the subscription to shares of common stock of Global Business Power Corporation, or Global Power, through Beacon Powergen Holdings, Inc., or Beacon Powergen, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Beacon.

On August 10, 2016, the Philippine SEC approved the increase in Beacon’s authorized capital and issuance of a new class of preferred shares.

Class “B” preferred shares of Beacon are non-voting, not convertible to common shares or any shares of any class of Beacon and have no pre-emptive rights to subscribe to any share or convertible debt, securities or warrants issued or sold by Beacon. The Class “B” preferred shares are entitled to liquidation preference over the common shares of Beacon and, upon the declaration of Beacon’s board of directors, yearly cumulative dividends at the rate of 6% of the issue value before any dividends can be paid to holders of common shares of Beacon subject to: (a) availability of unrestricted retained earnings; and (b) dividend payment will not violate any dividend restrictions imposed by Beacon’s bank creditors.

On September 9, 2016, the Board of Directors of Beacon approved the redemption of 198 million Class “B” preferred shares held by PCEV at an aggregate redemption price equal to the aggregate issue price of Php2,500 million. On the same date, Beacon also declared cash dividends on the said preferred shares amounting to Php21 million. The redemption price and cash dividend were paid on September 30, 2016.

Beacon’s Acquisition of 56% of Global Business Power Corporation

On May 27, 2016, Beacon, through a wholly owned subsidiary Beacon Powergen, entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with GT Capital Holdings, Inc., to acquire an aggregate 56% of the issued share capital of Global Power for a total consideration of Php22,058 million. Beacon Powergen settled Php11,029 million upon closing and the balance via a vendor financing facility, which was replaced with a long-term bank debt in August 2016.

Global Power is the leading power supplier in Visayas region and Mindoro island. In 2016, Global Power increased its combined gross maximum capacity to 854 megawatts, or MW, through a 150 MW expansion project that is currently undergoing final acceptance. In Luzon, Global Power has 670 MW expansion project that is still in the process of Engineering, Procurement and Construction selection.

Beacon Powergen’s investment in Global Power has a carrying value of Php21,902 million as at December 31, 2016.

See Note 10 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investment in Beacon to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

Investments of PLDT in VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare

On May 30, 2016, the PLDT Board approved the Company’s acquisition of 50% equity interest, including outstanding advances and assumed liabilities, in the telecommunications business of San Miguel Corporation, or SMC, with Globe acquiring the other 50% interest. On the same date, PLDT and Globe executed: (i) a SPA with SMC to acquire the entire outstanding capital, including outstanding advances and assumed liabilities, in Vega Telecom, Inc., or VTI, (and the other subsidiaries of VTI), which holds SMC’s telecommunications assets through its subsidiaries, or the VTI Transaction; and (ii) separate SPAs with the owners of two other entities, Bow Arken Holdings Company (parent company of New Century Telecoms, Inc.), or Bow Arken, and Brightshare Holdings, Inc. (parent company of eTelco, Inc.), or Brightshare which separately hold additional spectrum frequencies through their respective subsidiaries, or the Bow Arken Transaction and Brightshare Transaction, respectively. We refer to the VTI Transaction, Bow Arken Transaction and Brightshare Transaction, collectively as the SMC Transactions.

Consideration for the acquisitions is Php52.8 billion representing the purchase price for the equity interests in the three companies and assigned advances of previous owners to VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare. This consideration will be paid in three tranches: 50% was paid upon signing of the SPAs on May 30, 2016, 25% was paid on December 1, 2016 and the final 25% is payable on May 30, 2017, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. The second and final payments are secured by irrevocable standby letters of credit. The SPA also provided that PLDT and Globe, through VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare, assumed liabilities amounting to Php17.2 billion from May 30, 2016. In addition, the SPAs contain a price adjustment mechanism based on the variance in these assumed liabilities to be agreed among PLDT, Globe and the previous owners based on the results of the confirmatory due diligence procedures jointly performed by PLDT and Globe after May 30, 2016. Pending the completion of the due diligence procedures, as at December 31, 2016, PLDT and Globe have advanced about Php2.6 billion to cover the working capital requirements of the acquired companies. Discussion on the result of the due diligence procedures is ongoing.

 

19


Table of Contents

See Note 10 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments of PLDT in VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare and Note 28 – Financial Assets and Liabilities – Commercial Commitments to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further information.

Notice of Transaction filed with the Philippine Competition Commission

On May 30, 2016, prior to closing the transaction, each of PLDT, Globe and SMC submitted notices of the VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare Transactions (respectively, the VTI Notice, the Bow Arken Notice and the Brightshare Notice and collectively, the Notices) to the PCC pursuant to the Philippine Competition Act, or PCA, and Circular No. 16-001 and Circular No. 16-002 issued by the PCC, or the Circulars. The Circulars provide that, upon receipt by the PCC of the notices required thereby, the applicable transaction shall be deemed approved.

Subsequently, on June 7, 2016, PLDT and the other parties to the said transactions received separate letters dated June 6 and 7, 2016 from the PCC which essentially stated, that: (a) with respect to VTI Transaction, the VTI Notice is deficient and defective in form and substance, therefore, the VTI Transaction is not “deemed approved” by the PCC, and that the missing key terms of the transaction are critical since the PCC considers certain agreements as prohibited and illegal; and (b) with respect to the Bow Arken and Brightshare Transactions, the compulsory notification under the Circulars does not apply and that even assuming the Circulars apply, the Bow Arken Notice and the Brightshare Notice are deficient and defective in form and substance.

On June 10, 2016, PLDT submitted its response to the PCC letter articulating its position that the VTI Notice is adequate, complete and sufficient and compliant with the requirement under the Circulars, and does not contain false material information; as such, the VTI Transaction enjoys the benefit of Section 23 of the PCA and should be deemed approved and not subject to retroactive review by the PCC. Moreover, the parties believe they have taken all necessary steps, including the relinquishment/return of certain frequencies and co-use of the remaining frequencies by Smart and Belltel and Globe and Belltel as discussed above, to ensure that the VTI Transaction will not substantially prevent, restrict or lessen competition to violate the PCA. Nevertheless, in the spirit of cooperation and for transparency, the parties voluntarily submitted to the PCC, among others, copies of the SPAs for the PCC’s information and reference.

In a letter dated June 17, 2016, the PCC required the parties to further submit additional documents relevant to the co-use arrangement and the frequencies subject thereto, as well as other definitive agreements relating to the VTI Transaction. It also disregarded the deemed approved status of the VTI Transaction in violation of the Circulars which the PCC itself issued, and insisted that it will conduct a full review, if not investigation of the said transaction under the different operative provisions of the PCA.

In the Matter of the Petition against the PCC

On July 12, 2016, PLDT filed before the Court of Appeals, or CA, a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition (With Urgent Application for the Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Injunction), or the Petition, against the PCC. The Petition seeks to enjoin the PCC from proceeding with the review of the SMC Transactions and performing any act which challenges or assails the “deemed approved” status of the transaction. On July 19, 2016, the 12th Division of the CA issued a Resolution directing the Office of the Solicitor General, or the OSG, to file its Comment within a non-extensible period of 10 days from notice and show cause why the Petition should not be granted. On August 11, 2016, the PCC through the OSG, filed its Comment to the Petition (With Opposition to Petitioner’s Application for a Writ of Preliminary Injunction). On August 19, 2016, PLDT filed its Reply to Respondent PCC’s Comment.

On August 26, 2016, the CA 12th Division issued a Writ of Preliminary Injunction enjoining and directing the respondent PCC, their officials and agents, or persons acting for and in their behalf, to cease and desist from conducting further proceedings for the pre-acquisition review and/or investigation of the subject acquisition based on its Letters dated June 7, 2016 and June 17, 2016 during the effectivity hereof and until further orders are issued by the Court. On September 14, 2016, the PCC filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the CA’s Resolution dated August 26, 2016. In a Resolution promulgated on October 19, 2016, the CA’s 12th Division: (i) accepted the consolidation of Globe’s petition versus the PCC (CA G.R. SP No. 146538) into PLDT’s petition versus the PCC (CA G.R. SP No. 146528) with the right of replacement; (ii) admitted the Comment dated October 4, 2016 filed by the PCC; (iii) referred to the PCC for Comment (within 10 days from notice) PLDT’s Urgent Motion for the Issuance of a Gag Order dated September 30, 2016; and (iv) ordered all parties to submit simultaneous memoranda within a non-extendible period of 15 days from notice. Thereafter, with or without their respective memorandum, the instant cases are submitted for decision. On November 11, 2016, PLDT filed its Memorandum in compliance with the CA Resolution.

On February 17, 2017, the CA issued a Resolution denying PCC’s Motion for Reconsideration dated September 14, 2016 for lack of merit. The Court denied PLDT’s Motion to Cite the PCC in indirect contempt for being premature. In the same Resolution, as well as in a separate Gag Order attached to the Resolution, the CA granted PLDT’s Urgent Motion for the Issuance of a Gag Order and directed the PCC to remove immediately from its website its PSOC and submit its compliance within five days from receipt thereof. All the parties were ordered to refrain, cease and desist from issuing public comments and statements that would violate the sub judice rule and subject them to indirect contempt of court. The parties were also required to comment within ten days from receipt of the Resolution, on the Motion for Leave to Intervene, and Admit the Petition-in-Intervention dated February 7, 2017 filed by Citizenwatch, a non-stock and non-profit association.

 

20


Table of Contents

On April 18, 2017, the PCC filed a Petition before the Supreme Court to Annul the Writ of Preliminary Injunction issued by the CA’s 12th Division on August 26, 2016 restraining PCC’s review of the SMC transactions.

The petition remains pending resolution with the CA.

See Note 10 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments of PLDT in VTI, Bow Arken and BrightshareNotice of Transaction filed with the Philippine Competition Commission to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further information.

VTI’s Tender Offer for the Minority Stockholders’ Shares in Liberty Telecom Holdings, Inc., or LIB

On August 18, 2016, the Board of Directors of VTI approved the voluntary tender offer to acquire the common shares of LIB, a subsidiary of VTI, which are held by the remaining minority shareholders, and the intention to delist the shares of LIB from the PSE.

On August 24, 2016, VTI, owner of 87.12% of the outstanding common shares of LIB, undertook the tender offer to purchase up to 165.88 million common shares owned by the remaining minority shareholders, representing 12.82% of LIB’s common stock, at a price of Php2.20 per share. The tender offer period ended on October 20, 2016, the extended expiration date, with over 107 million shares tendered, representing approximately 8.3% of LIB’s issued and outstanding common shares. The tendered shares were crossed at the PSE on November 4, 2016, with the settlement on November 9, 2016.

Following the conclusion of the tender offer, VTI now owns more than 95% of the issued and outstanding common shares, and 99.1% of the total issued and outstanding capital stock, of LIB.

The tender offer was undertaken in compliance with the PSE’s requirements for the voluntary delisting of LIB common shares from the PSE. The voluntary delisting of LIB has been granted by the PSE effective November 21, 2016.

Agreement between PLDT Capital and Hopscotch

On April 15, 2016, PLDT Capital and Hopscotch, entered into an agreement to market and exclusively distribute Hopscotch’s mobile solutions in Southeast Asia through Gohopscotch Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., a Singapore company incorporated on March 1, 2016, of which PLDT Capital and Hopscotch own 90% and 10% of the equity interests, respectively. The Hopscotch mobile-platform technology allows for the rapid development of custom mobile applications for sports teams, live events, and brands to create a memorable and monetizable fan experience and also increase mobile advertising revenue. As a vehicle to execute the agreement, PLDT Capital incorporated Gohopscotch Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., a Singapore company, on March 1, 2016.

See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Joint Venture with Gohopscotch, Inc. to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18 “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

eInnovations’ Investment in ECommerce Pay Holding S.à r.l., or ECommerce Pay

On January 6, 2015, PLDT, through eInnovations Holdings Pte. Ltd, or eInnovations, entered into a JVA with Rocket, pursuant to which the two parties agreed to form ECommerce Pay, of which each partner holds a 50% equity interest. ECommerce Pay is a global joint venture company for payment services with a focus on emerging markets.

On July 30, 2015, eInnovations became a 50% shareholder of ECommerce Pay and invested €1.2 million in ECommerce Pay on August 11, 2015.

 

21


Table of Contents

On February 3, 2016, eInnovations further contributed its subsidiary ePay Investments Pte. Ltd., or ePay, including the intellectual property, platforms and business operations of its mobile-first platform, PayMaya Philippines, Inc., or PayMaya, as had been agreed in the JVA. Rocket contributed, among other things, its equity in Paymill Holding GmbH and Payleven Holding GmbH, which operated via its subsidiaries, payment platforms for high growth, small-and-medium sized e-commerce businesses.

Consequently, in February 2016, the ownership of ePay and its subsidiaries, or the ePay Group, was transferred from eInnovations to ECommerce Pay and hence Ecommerce’s effective interest in ePay went down to 50%. Pending completion of the other expected contributions from Rocket, ePay Group continued to be a subsidiary of PLDT.

Rocket and PLDT via eInnovations agreed to end the joint venture with control and all rights in ePay to be returned to eInnovations via a retransfer of the shares in ePay. In return, eInnovations gave up its 50% ownership and all claims in connection with Ecommerce Pay. On July 29, 2016, eInnovations exited Ecommerce Pay and the whole ownership of ePay, including the platforms and business operations of its mobile-first platform, PayMaya, was returned to eInnovations.

PLDT and Rocket have decided to unwind the joint venture to better focus on their respective areas of operation and current priorities. Both continue to explore areas of possible future collaboration.

See Note 10 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures – eInnovations’ Investment in ECommerce Pay Holding S.à.r.l to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

PLDT Online’s Investment in iflix Limited, or iflix

On April 23, 2015, PLDT Online Investments Pte. Ltd., or PLDT Online, subscribed to a convertible note of iflix, an internet TV service provider in Southeast Asia, for US$15 million, or Php686 million. The convertible note was issued and paid on August 11, 2015. iflix will use the funds to continue to roll out the iflix subscription video-on-demand services across the Southeast Asian region, acquire rights to new content, and produce original programming to market to potential customers.

This investment is in line with our strategy to develop new revenue streams and to complement our present business by participating in the digital world beyond providing access and connectivity.

On March 10, 2016, the US$15 million convertible note held by PLDT Online was converted into 20.7 million ordinary shares of iflix after it completed a new round of funding led by Sky Plc, Europe’s leading entertainment company and the Indonesian company, Emtek Group, through its subsidiary, PT Surya Citra Media Tbk, or SCMA. PLDT Online’s shares account for the 7.6% of the total equity stock of iflix.

For a detailed discussion, see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 10 – Investment in Associates, Joint Ventures and Deposits and Note 11 – Available-for-Sale Financial Investments – Investment of PLDT Online in iflix Limited to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Business Overview

As at December 31, 2016, our business activities were categorized into three business units: Wireless, Fixed Line and Others.

We monitor the operating results of each business unit separately for purposes of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Wireless

While our legacy business of voice and SMS still provides the majority of our revenues, data, whether mobile internet (accessed via the mobile phone) or broadband (accessed via dongles and other similar devices), is the fastest-growing and therefore, the focus areas of our business today. We generate data revenues from across all segments of our wireless business.

We provide (a) mobile services, (b) home broadband services, (c) digital platforms and mobile financial services, and (d) MVNO and other services, through our wireless business, which contributed approximately 96%, 3% and (collectively for digital platforms and mobile financial services, and MVNO and other services) 1%, respectively, of our wireless service revenues in 2016. Mobile data usage has surged in the past several years while voice and SMS usage has slowed down. Wireless revenues contributed 59% of our total revenues in 2016 as compared to 63% and 64% for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Our mobile service revenues, were 92%, 91% and 92% of our total wireless revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Our mobile services, which accounted for approximately 96% of our wireless service revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016, are provided through Smart and DMPI with 62,763,209 total subscribers as at December 31, 2016 as compared to 68,612,118 total subscribers as at December 31, 2015, and 72,511,425 total subscribers as at December 31, 2014, representing a combined market share of approximately 50%, 55% and 62% as at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Mobile penetration in the Philippines remained stable at approximately 124% in each of 2016 and 2015, and account for approximately 34 and 36 times the country’s fixed line penetration in 2016 and 2015, respectively, although the existence of subscribers owning multiple SIM cards results in this penetration rate being inflated to a certain extent.

 

22


Table of Contents

As at December 31, 2016, approximately 96% of our mobile subscribers were prepaid service subscribers. The predominance of prepaid service reflects one of the distinguishing characteristics of the Philippine mobile market, allowing us to reduce billing and administrative costs on a per-subscriber basis, as well as to control credit risk. We have also retained our leading position in the postpaid service with our combined Smart and Sun postpaid subscribers, representing a market share of approximately 53%.

The continued growth of internet usage by smartphone and broadband dongle users resulted in significant increase in our mobile data revenues. As a result, our mobile internet revenues, which are part of our mobile data service revenues, increased by Php5,112 million, or 42%, to Php17,167 million in 2016 from Php12,055 million in 2015. Our mobile internet revenues contributed 67% and 60% of our mobile data service revenues in 2016 and 2015, respectively. SMS contributed 34% and 36% of our mobile service revenues in 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition, mobile broadband revenues, which are derived from the use of dongles and other similar mobile broadband devices, grew by Php196 million, or 2%, to Php8,147 million.

Smart’s and DMPI’s wireless network is the most extensive in the Philippines, covering substantially all of Metropolitan Manila and most of the other major population centers in the Philippines. Its dual-band GSM network allows it to efficiently deploy high capacity 1800 Megahertz, or MHz, BTS in dense urban areas and deploy its 900 MHz BTS on a relatively more economical basis in potentially high growth, but less densely populated provincial areas. We utilize 3G high-speed packet access (HSPA), 4G HSPA+ or LTE technology and are currently upgrading our wireless broadband facilities.

Fixed Line

We are the leading provider of fixed line telecommunications services throughout the Philippines, servicing retail, corporate and small and medium sized enterprises, or SME, clients. Our fixed line business group offers voice, data and miscellaneous services. We had 2,438,473 fixed line subscribers as at December 31, 2016, an increase of 135,019, or 6%, from 2,303,454 fixed line subscribers as at December 31, 2015, mainly due to higher net additions in 2016 compared with 2015. Revenues from our fixed line business were 41%, 37% and 36% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Domestic voice revenues have been declining largely due to a drop in call volumes as a result of continued popularity of alternative means of communications such as texting, e-mailing and internet telephony. An increase in our data service revenues in recent years have mitigated such decline to a certain extent. Recognizing the growth potential of data services, we have put considerable emphasis on the development of new data-capable and IP-based networks.

Our 11,893-kilometer long DFON is complemented by an extensive digital microwave backbone network operated by Smart. This microwave network complements the higher capacity fiber optic networks and is vital in delivering reliable services to areas not covered by fixed terrestrial transport network. Our fixed line network reaches all of the major cities and municipalities in the Philippines, with a concentration in the Metropolitan Manila area. Our network offers the country’s most extensive connections to international networks through two international gateway switching exchanges and various regional submarine cable systems in which we have economic interests.

See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Infrastructure – Fixed Line Network Infrastructure” for further information on our fixed line infrastructure.

Others

Our other business consists primarily of PCEV, an investment holding company, which owns an 8.74% effective interest in Meralco as at December 31, 2015 (a decrease from 17.48% as at December 31, 2015), through its 25% equity interest in Beacon; PLDT Global Investments Corporation, or PGIC, which owns an 18.32% economic interest in Beta, an investment holding company of SPi Technologies, Inc., or SPi, and its subsidiaries, or SPi Group, where we reinvested approximately US$40 million of the proceeds from the sale of BPO in 2013; and PLDT Digital Investments Pte. Ltd., or PLDT Digital, an investment holding company, which owns a 6.1% equity interest in Rocket, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, PLDT Online.

Capital Expenditures and Divestitures

See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Plans” for capital expenditures planned for 2017 and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and Capital Resources” for information concerning our principal capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016.

With the exception of the sale of 112.71 million common shares, comprising approximately a 10% equity interest, in Meralco to MPIC, there were no material divestitures in 2015.

On May 30, 2016, the PLDT Board approved the Company’s acquisition of 50% equity interest, including outstanding advances and assumed liabilities, in the entities that own the telecommunications business of SMC with Globe acquiring the remaining 50% interest. See Item 10. “Additional Information – Material Contracts” for further information.

On May 30, 2016, PCEV sold common and preferred stock of Beacon, representing approximately 25% equity interest in Beacon to MPIC for a total consideration of Php26,200 million.

See Item 4. “Recent Developments” for further information.

 

23


Table of Contents

Organization

See Exhibit 8. “List of Subsidiaries” for a listing of PLDT’s significant subsidiaries, including name, country of incorporation, proportion of ownership interests and, where different, proportion of voting power held.

Strengths

We believe our business is characterized by the following competitive strengths:

 

   

Recognized Brands. PLDT, Smart, TNT and Sun are widely recognized brand names in the Philippines. We have built the PLDT brand name for over 88 years as the leading telecommunications provider in the Philippines. Smart is recognized in the Philippines as an innovative provider of high-quality mobile services. The TNT brand, which is provided using Smart’s network, has also gained significant recognition as a price-competitive brand. Since its launch in 2003, Sun has built considerable brand equity as a provider of “unlimited” services. Having a range of strong and recognizable brands allows us to offer to various market segments differentiated products and services that suit customers’ budgets and usage preferences.

 

   

Leading Market Shares. With approximately 67 million fixed line, mobile and broadband subscribers as at December 31, 2016, we have maintained our position as a market leader in each of the fixed line, mobile and broadband markets in the Philippines in terms of both subscribers and revenues.

 

   

Diversified Revenue Sources. We derive our revenues from two of our business segments, namely, Wireless and Fixed Line, with each contributing 59% and 41%, respectively, to our total revenues in 2016, 63% and 37%, respectively, in 2015, and 64% and 36%, respectively, in 2014. Revenue sources of our wireless business include mobile (voice, SMS, mobile data, and inbound roaming and other mobile services), home broadband, digital platforms and mobile financial services, and MVNO and other services. Revenues from mobile voice and SMS have been declining over the past several years, but this decline has been partly mitigated by the increase in revenues from data services, particularly mobile internet and mobile broadband services. Our fixed line business derives service revenues from voice (local exchange, international and domestic services), data and miscellaneous services. Revenues from international and domestic fixed line services have been declining over the past several years due to pressures on traditional fixed line voice revenues as a result of the popularity of OTT service providers (such as Facebook, Skype, Viber, WhatsApp, and similar services), but have been offset by the significant revenue contributions from our home broadband, corporate data and leased lines, and data center and IT services, as well as higher revenues from our local exchange service.

 

   

Superior Integrated Network. With the most extensive telecommunications networks in the Philippines, we are able to offer a wide array of communications services. Part of our network transformation program included the continued upgrade of our fixed line network to an all IP-based NGN, the build-out of our transmission and FTTH network, the investment in increased international bandwidth capacity, and the expansion of our 3G, 4G LTE and wireless broadband networks in order to enhance our data and broadband capabilities. Our network investments include the upgrade of our IT capabilities which are essential in enabling us to offer more relevant services to our customers.

 

   

Innovative Products and Services. Voyager Innovations, Inc. or Voyager, (including through its affiliates PayMaya Philippines, Fintqnologies Corporation, or FINTQ, and Takatack Technologies Pte. Ltd. or Takatack Technologies) is the digital innovations arm of PLDT and Smart. Voyager creates and launches platforms, services and solutions for emerging markets in the areas of digital financial services, access including sponsored data, data-in-sachets and messaging, e-Commerce platforms, digital marketing solutions, and the incubation of other new technologies. Through PayMaya and FINTQ, the Voyager Group offers various digital financial services and financial technology solutions.

 

   

Strong Strategic Relationships. We have important strategic relationships with First Pacific, NTT DOCOMO and NTT Communications. We believe the technological support, international experience and management expertise made available to us through these strategic relationships will enable us to enhance our market leadership and provide/cross-sell a wider range of products and services.

Strategy

The key elements of our business strategy are:

 

   

Build on our strong positions in the fixed line and wireless businesses. We plan to continue building on our position as one of the leading fixed line and wireless service providers in the Philippines by continuing to launch new products and services to increase subscriber value and utilization of our existing facilities and equipment at reduced cost, and to increase our subscribers’ use of our network for both voice and data, as well as their reliance on our services.

 

   

Capitalize on our strength as an integrated provider of telecommunications services. We offer the broadest range of telecommunications services among all operators in the Philippines. We plan to capitalize on this position to maximize revenue opportunities by cross-selling our products and services, and by developing convergent products that feature the combined benefits of voice and data, fixed line, wireless, and other products and services, including media content, utilizing our network and business platforms.

 

24


Table of Contents
   

Strengthen our leading position in the data and broadband market. Leveraging on the inherent strengths of our fixed line and wireless businesses, we are committed to further develop our fastest growing business – broadband and data services, including mobile internet and mobile broadband. Consistent with our strategy of introducing innovative products and services using advanced technology, we continue to launch various products and services in the data and broadband market that deliver quality of experience according to different market needs, including data centers and cloud-related services. We will also accelerate the deployment of new base stations to boost quality and coverage, and accommodate technology bands under the co-use agreement with BellTel.

 

   

Provide the customer a superior data experience. We are in the process of executing our digital transformation strategy through our wireless business focusing on: (i) investing in network infrastructure to improve 3G and 4G coverage and capacity, as well as network resilience; (ii) upgrading service development platforms to improve customers’ ease-of-use, billing systems, customer interface; and (iii) beefing up our content portfolio to include entertainment, peace-of-mind/convenience, and games, among others.

 

   

Maintain a strong financial position and improve shareholder returns. Following significant improvements in our financial position, we restored the payment of cash dividends to our common shareholders beginning in 2005 and declared dividend payouts of approximately 100% of our core earnings for the seven consecutive years from 2007 to 2013, approximately 90% of our core earnings for 2014 and approximately 75% of our core earnings in 2015. In 2016, we are paying out dividends of approximately 60% of our core earnings. We plan to continue utilizing our free cash flows for the payment of cash dividends to common shareholders and investments in new growth areas. As part of our growth strategy, we have made and may continue to make acquisitions and investments in companies or businesses. We will continue to consider value-accretive investments in telecommunications as well as telco-related businesses.

Business

Wireless

We provide mobile, home broadband, digital platforms and mobile financial services, as well as MVNO and other services, through our wireless business.

The following table summarizes key measures of our wireless business as at and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

     December 31,  
     2016     2015     2014  

Systemwide mobile subscriber base

     62,763,209       68,612,118       72,511,422  

Prepaid

     59,952,941       65,063,860       69,234,178  

Postpaid

     2,810,268       3,548,258       3,277,244  

Home Broadband subscriber base

     270,203       258,776       331,781  

Growth rate of mobile subscribers

      

Prepaid

     (8 %)      (6 %)      —    

Postpaid

     (21 %)      8     20

Growth rate of Home Broadband subscribers

     4     (22 %)      (24 %) 

Wireless service revenues (in millions)

   Php 100,582     Php 110,716     Php 115,037  

Mobile

     96,497       105,655       108,780  

Home Broadband

     2,772       3,040       4,019  

Digital platforms and mobile financial services

     728       1,051       1,056  

MVNO and others

     585       970       1,182  

Percentage to wireless service revenues

      

Mobile

     96     95     95

Home Broadband

     3     3     3

Digital platforms and mobile financial services

     1     1     1

MVNO and others

     —         1     1

Percentage of wireless service revenues to total service revenues

     59     63     64

Mobile Services

Our mobile business, which we provide through Smart and DMPI to approximately 63 million subscribers as at December 31, 2016, focuses on providing wireless voice and data communications, primarily through mobile, home broadband, digital platforms and mobile financial services, and inbound roaming and other services.

Smart and DMPI market nationwide mobile communications services under the brand names Smart, TNT and Sun. Smart, together with TNT and Sun, has focused on segmenting the market by offering sector-specific, value-driven packages for our subscribers. Our mobile services include a variety of data and multimedia services that cater to the growing use of smartphones by our subscribers, as well as voice and text services. We offer a variety of packages that include “buckets” of a fixed number of messages, calls of a preset duration and data allowance, with a prescribed validity period. Smart, TNT and Sun also provide buckets which offer voice, text and hybrid bundles available to all networks, as well as packages with unlimited on-net voice, text, volume-based data, and combinations thereof, denominations of which depend on the duration and nature of the packages.

In order to fulfill its goal of providing its subscribers with the best digital experience, Smart is committed to providing its customers with a superior data experience. Key to achieving this requires a superior network in terms of coverage, capacity and internet speeds. This involves the use of 3G and LTE technologies, and the integration of Smart and Sun networks to improve coverage and quality for subscribers of both brands, among others.

 

25


Table of Contents

On April 13, 2016, Smart was the first to introduce LTE-Advanced in Boracay, which achieved breakthrough LTE speeds of up to 250 Mbps. The program also boosted 3G data service in Boracay behind an enhanced 3G/high speed packet access, or HSPA/HSPA+ coverage and capacity.

Since July 2016, PLDT and Smart have rolled-out carrier-grade Smart WiFi in key transport hubs, identified by the Department of Transportation, in line with the PLDT Group’s commitment to make internet available to the public at world-class speeds for a seamless digital experience. Apart from the Ninoy Aquino International Airport, the country’s biggest airport, Smart WiFi is now available in key airports all over the country, including those in Davao, Misamis Oriental, Bacolod, Iloilo, Roxas, Zamboanga, Clark, Dumaguete, Laoag, General Santos, Kalibo and Puerto Princesa. Smart WiFi was also installed in the sea ports of Batangas City and Calapan in Mindoro. It is scheduled for rollout in more regional airports, sea ports, and the rail-based MRT and LRT lines 1 and 2 in Metro Manila, and the rest of the country in the coming months.

In connection with the drive to boost our 3G/LTE data services, on July 1, 2016, we introduced Giga Surf 50 with 1GB of open access data allowance plus 300 MB for access to iflix, Spinnr, YouTube, and other streaming services for Php50 valid for three days. This promo is open to Smart Postpaid, Smart Prepaid, Smart Bro Postpaid and Smart Bro Prepaid subscribers and can also be shared through Smart’s PasaData.

In October 2016, we also completed our spectrum refarming process in Davao which aimed to extend coverage and increase the speed and quality of our data services. As a result of capacity enhancements, the average download speeds of Smart’s 3G service in Metro Davao have increased nearly six times to approximately 6 Mbps while that of LTE has gone up more than 4.5 times to over 17 Mbps, based on internal field tests. Similar initiatives to improve network quality are currently ongoing in Cebu, Rizal and Metro Manila.

As we improve our network around the country, we continue to keep an eye on the future of mobile technology. In December 2016, Smart and Nokia successfully carried out the country’s first 5G showcase over a live network at Nokia Technology Center in Quezon City, achieving 5G speeds of 2.5 Gigabits per second using 100 MHz with latency of just one millisecond. This milestone is part of Smart’s roadmap to be 5G-ready by 2020 through strategic investments in infrastructure today.

Smart also teamed up with PayMaya Philippines to launch Smart Mastercard in October 2016. Under the partnership, mobile users who download the PayMaya app on their Android or iOS phones and register with their Smart, TNT or Sun number, may instantly get a virtual Smart Mastercard account number which they can load up at PayMaya load-up centers and can use at any of the more than 36 million merchants worldwide that accept Mastercard. Smart subscribers who download the PayMaya app can also get as much as 10 percent discount on Smart Prepaid load when they purchase in-app, as well as enjoy other exciting perks from partners.

SmartBro is a wireless broadband and data service offered to individual consumers as well as small and medium-scale enterprises in the Philippines. Smart Bro continues to grow mobile broadband revenues through various prepaid and postpaid offers, with various packages for both new and existing subscribers. It also recently began offering Smart Bro Pocket WiFi, a portable wireless router which can be shared by up to 10 users/devices at a time, and which provides connectivity at varying speeds and is supported by Smart’s network utilizing HSPA, 4G HSPA+ and LTE-technology. Smart Bro Pocket WiFi is available in both postpaid and prepaid variants, and can even offer connectivity to areas far from major cities.

In November 2016, SmartBro unveiled new postpaid plans which include free Smart Bro Pocket WiFi devices, and provide more data and faster speeds. The plans range from Plan 299, which comes with 3.5GB of data, to Plan 999, which offers 15GB of data. All of these programs helped bring new subscribers into the Smart brand, driving growth in activations and creating excitement around Smart.

Sun postpaid plans offer a variety of services to cater to the needs of subscribers at affordable prices. The Best Value Plans, which start at Php350 per month, come with a free smartphone, unlimited Sun Calls and Texts, 250 free texts to users on other networks, and 100MB of mobile data. Sun also offers international direct dialing, or IDD, plans which allow subscribers to make international calls and send SMS to select countries for as low as Php1.50 per minute of voice call or per SMS. The IDD plans also come with a free Android handset and free calls and SMS to Sun and other networks, depending on the plan.

Sun Bro is an affordable wireless broadband service utilizing advanced 3.5G HSPA and LTE technology offering various plans and packages to internet users. Sun Bro continues to grow the value broadband segment with its Non-Stop Surf Plans and Loads.

Voice Services

Mobile voice services, which comprise all voice traffic and have remained a significant contributor to wireless revenues, generated a total of 37%, 42% and 45% of wireless service revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Data Services

Mobile revenues from our data services include mobile internet, mobile broadband and other data services.

The Philippine mobile market is one of the most SMS-intensive markets in the world, with close to a billion text messages sent per day. SMS is extremely popular in the Philippines, particularly on the prepaid platform, as it provides a convenient and inexpensive alternative to voice and e-mail based communications. However, the increased preference of communication through various mobile applications, social networking sites and other OTT services has provided a vast selection of communication tools and is causing a decrease in SMS revenues.

 

26


Table of Contents

Mobile data revenues accounted for 25%, 18% and 13% of our wireless service revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Revenues from mobile internet includes web-based services such as mobile internet browsing and video streaming, net of discounts and content provider costs. Mobile internet browsing has shown significant growth as a result of the popularity of social networking and the affordability of smartphones. Mobile internet revenues accounted for 67%, 60% and 57% of our mobile data service revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Our current approach is to continue maximizing our 3G network services while upgrading our network to 4G LTE. We aim to encourage sustained growth in mobile internet browsing by offering free internet access to mobile subscribers.

Smart and DMPI offer the following VAS:

 

   

Smart Pasa Load, Sun Give-a-load, Dial*SOS and Surfloan. Pasa Load/Give-a-load is a service which allows prepaid and postpaid subscribers to transfer small denominations of air time credits to other prepaid subscribers. Dial*SOS allows Smart prepaid subscribers to borrow up to Php10 worth of load which can be used for text messages, calls and mobile browsing. Surfloan enables SmartBro prepaid subscribers to borrow up to Php10 worth of load for 20 minutes of internet browsing. Availing subscribers will be deducted upon their next top-up;

 

   

Infotainment, which includes revenues from subscriptions and downloads of broadcast materials that are intended both to entertain and to inform, as well as info-on-demand;

 

   

Music, which includes revenues from music streaming apps – Spinnr and Deezer, as well as revenues from music subscriptions mainly ring back tunes and music downloads;

 

   

Gaming, which includes revenues from various game subscriptions, downloads, and purchases;

 

   

Videos, which includes revenues from video subscriptions, downloads and video and movie streaming via iflix and Fox;

 

   

Financial services, which include revenues from Smart Money Clicks via Smart Menu and mobile banking. Smart Money Clicks includes the following services: balance inquiry, re-load prepaid accounts, bills payment, card management and internet purchases;

 

   

Communicate, which includes revenues from group chat, text and voice messaging; and

 

   

Other VAS, which includes revenues from direct carrier billings that covers application program interface, or API, downloads, and other VAS services.

Rates

Our current policy is to recognize a prepaid subscriber as “active” only when the subscriber activates and uses the SIM card. A prepaid mobile subscriber is considered inactive if the subscriber does not reload within 120 days after the full usage or expiry of the last reload.

Smart Prepaid and TNT call and text prepaid cards are sold in denominations of Php100, Php300 and Php500. The Php300 and Php500 cards include 33 and 83 free text messages, respectively. The stored value of a prepaid card remains valid for a period ranging from 30 days to 120 days depending on the denomination of the card, with larger denominations having longer validity periods from the time a subscriber activates the card. We launch from time to time promotions with shorter validity periods.

The introduction of electronic loading facility, Smart eLoad, made reloading of air time credits more convenient and accessible to consumers. Smart eLoad’s over-the-air reloads have evolved to respond to market needs and now come in various denominations ranging from Php5 to Php1,000 with corresponding expiration periods. The introduction of Smart eLoad was followed by Pasa Load, a derivative service, allowing prepaid and postpaid subscribers to transfer denominations to other prepaid subscribers.

Smart also offers fixed rate or “bucket” packages as a means of driving subscriber activations and stimulating usage. These bucket packages, which offer a fixed amount of text messages, call minutes or data volume for a limited validity period, have proven to be popular with subscribers.

Smart also offers unlimited voice, text and data packages under its various brands in order to be competitive. These plans include the All In, Unli Voice and Text, and high data allocation postpaid plans with monthly service fees ranging from Php250 to Php2,999 for Smart Postpaid and from Php3,500 to Php8,000 for Smart Infinity plans. A certain amount of free calls, texts and data are offered pursuant to these plans, with additional charges at different rates for usage in excess of the allocated amounts, depending on the monthly plan.

Smart subscribers pay an international direct dialing rate of US$0.40 per minute. This rate applies to most destinations, including the United States, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Smart charges US$0.98 per minute for 27 other destinations and US$2.18 per minute for another ten destinations. Smart subscribers also have the option of calling at more affordable rates, which are as low as Php2.50 per minute, through Smart Sulit IDD load.

 

27


Table of Contents

International web browsing was also made more affordable and convenient with the relaunch of Surf Abroad, whereby subscribers automatically enjoy web browsing abroad for a fixed rate of Php550 per day with no registration required, so long as the subscriber turns on the data roaming feature. This service was expanded to 158 countries in 2016. Smart also offers Smart Travel Wifi powered by virtual SIM technology that enables local connectivity for up to five devices. Smart Travel Wifi, a broadband device that provides high-speed internet service in over 100 countries, which is powered by virtual SIM technology that enables local connectivity for up to five devices to local networks for as low as Php390 per day in Asia and Php490 per day elsewhere in the world.

In October 2016, Smart also launched Smart Chat Abroad, a data roaming service which offers Smart Prepaid and Smart Postpaid subscribers to access applications such as Facebook Messenger, Viber, WhatsApp, Line, WeChat and other chat applications while roaming abroad in over 130 countries, for a fixed rate of only Php150 per day.

Smart Bro Pocket WiFi is available in prepaid and postpaid variants. The standard charge for 15 minutes of internet access is Php5 for Smart Bro prepaid and Php2.50 for Smart Bro postpaid. We also offer various additional load packages covering all-day access, volume-based charging and longer validity periods. For example, SurfMax is a package which offers all-day internet access for up to 30 days, and GigaSurf is a volume based data package, which includes a free entertainment bundle and supports the Pasa-Data feature, enabling users to share their open access volume to other subscribers.

Distribution and Discounts

We sell our mobile services primarily through a network of independent dealers and distributors that generally have their own retail networks, direct sales forces and sub-dealers. We currently have 19 exclusive regional and 109 exclusive provincial distributors, and 67 key account dealers, 17 of which are exclusive. These dealers include major distributors of mobile handsets and broadband modems whose main focus is telecommunications outlets. Account managers from our sales force manage the distribution network and regularly update these business partners on upcoming marketing strategies, promotional campaigns and new products. With the introduction of Smart eLoad, Smart moved into a new realm of distribution. These over-the-air reloads, which were based on the “sachet” marketing concept of consumer goods, such as shampoo and ketchup, required a distribution network that approximates those of fast-moving consumer goods companies. Sun also offers over-the-air reloads through Sun’s Xpress Load. Starting with just 50,000 outlets when it was launched, our distribution network now encompasses approximately 1.6 million retailers with Smart and Sun combined. These retailers must be affiliated with one of Smart’s and Sun’s authorized dealers, distributors, sub-dealers or agents. With the prepaid reloading distribution network now extended to corner store and individual retailer levels and minimum reloading denominations as low as Php10, Smart’s prepaid service became more affordable and accessible to subscribers.

For prepaid services, we offer competitive transfer prices for prepaid phone kits and modems. Call and text cards and over-the-air reloads are sold at a discount ranging from approximately 8% to 9.44%.

Home Broadband Service

HOMEBro is a fixed wireless broadband service being offered under PLDT’s HOME brand. PLDT HOMEBro is powered by Smart’s wireless broadband base stations which allow subscribers to connect to the internet using indoor or outdoor customer premises equipment through various wireless technologies. Home Ultera, our fixed wireless broadband offering specifically designed for the home, offers customized packages and utilizes the TD-LTE technology.

In addition to providing the country’s most affordable home broadband service, PLDT has always been at the forefront of offering subscribers with diverse and compelling bundled content through its partnerships with globally renowned content providers. These partners include iflix, Southeast Asia’s leading internet TV service provider; Fox International Channels which offers a wide range of video-on-demand, live content and catch-up TV; and ABS-CBN’s iWanTV, the leading OTT content platform in the Philippines.

Rates

HOMEBro Ultera offers LTE FUN packages with speeds ranging from 3Mbps up to 20 Mbps. These packages include Plan 699, which offers up to 3Mbps at 30GB monthly volume, Plan 999, which offers up to 5Mbps at 50GB monthly volume, Plan 1599, which offers up to 10Mbps at 70GB, Plan 1999, which offers up to 15Mbps at 80GB, and Plan 2999, which offers up to 20Mbps at 100GB monthly volume capacity.

Digital Platforms and Mobile Financial Services

Voyager and PayMaya Philippines (formerly Smart eMoney, Inc.), collectively known as the Voyager Group, provide digital innovations and digital financial services for emerging markets, starting with the Philippines. The Voyager Group and PayMaya Philippines focus on digital customer engagement, digital marketing solutions, digital financial services, and e-Commerce platforms, as well as incubation of other new technologies.

Digital Customer Engagement

PowerApp is the globally-patented data sachet platform that is now embedded in the equipment of major telecom network vendors.

Talk2 is an OTT app suitable for overseas Filipinos, enabling users to have a Philippine number abroad and also providing users with voice call and SMS functionalities at local rates.

 

28


Table of Contents

Freenet is the country’s first sponsored data access service that allows brands and businesses to easily reach their customers by offering free access to their mobile apps and sites.

Digital Marketing Solutions

HATCH provides end-to-end content, advertising, and platform solutions that aims to connect brands to people and communities.

VYGR provides digital marketing services to customers using industry best practices that translate to lower cost and better reach.

Digital Financial Services

PayMaya provides an OTT digital payments mobile app, remittance and other related services, including Smart Money, the pioneering mobile money service linked to the Smart SIM and mobile phone. PayMaya also offers Smart Padala, the leading domestic remittance service brand in the market.

FINTQ provides consumer-centric and demand-driven innovative digital platforms, products and services for financial and non-financial institutions across underserved, unserved and banked customers. These platforms cover digital lending, disbursements, micro-savings, micro-insurance, NFC contactless and online payments, and anti-fraud and card control solutions, among others.

e-Commerce Platforms

Takatack is a digital commerce marketplace that brings together products and different merchants, catering to both consumers and enterprises.

TackThis! is a digital online store enabler for retailers, which powers every merchant’s online site and storefront allowing them to own their brand and build relationships directly with their customers.

Fixed Line

We provide voice services, including LEC, international and domestic services, data and miscellaneous services under our fixed line business.

We offer postpaid and prepaid fixed line services. Initially intended to be an affordable alternative telephone service for consumers under difficult economic conditions, our prepaid fixed line services came to form an important part of our overall churn and credit risk exposure management strategy.

The following table summarizes key measures of our fixed line services as at and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

     December 31,  
     2016     2015     2014  

Systemwide fixed line subscriber base

     2,438,473       2,303,454       2,207,889  

Postpaid

     2,406,881       2,269,883       2,149,846  

Prepaid

     31,592       33,571       58,043  

Growth rate of fixed line subscribers

      

Postpaid

     6     6     7

Prepaid

     (6 %)      (42 %)      (3 %) 

Number of fixed line employees

     7,205       7,039       7,405  

Number of local exchange line subscribers per employee

     338       327       298  

Fixed line service revenues (in millions)

   Php 69,006     Php 65,475     Php 64,107  

Voice

     29,630       30,253       32,356  

Data

     37,711       33,748       30,332  

Miscellaneous

     1,665       1,474       1,419  

Percentage to fixed line service revenues

      

Voice

     43     46     51

Data

     55     52     47

Miscellaneous

     2     2     2

Percentage of fixed line revenues to total service revenues

     44     41     40

Voice Services

Local Exchange

Our local exchange service, which consists of our basic voice telephony business, is provided primarily through PLDT. We also provide local exchange services through our subsidiaries – PLDT-Philcom, Inc. and subsidiaries, or Philcom Group, Bonifacio Communications Corporation, or BCC, PLDT Clark Telecom, Inc., or ClarkTel, PLDT Subic Telecom, Inc., or SubicTel, Smart Broadband, Primeworld Digital Systems, Inc., or PDSI, PLDT-Maratel, Inc., or PLDT Maratel and Digitel. Together, these subsidiaries account for approximately 4% of our consolidated fixed line subscribers.

Revenues from our local exchange service amounted to Php17,792 million in 2016, Php17,076 million in 2015 and Php16,587 million in 2014. The increases in revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014 were primarily due to higher weighted average postpaid billed lines.

 

29


Table of Contents

Rates

Basic monthly charges for our local exchange service vary according to the type of customer (business or residential) and location, with charges for urban customers generally being higher than those for rural/provincial customers. Regular installation charges amount to Php1,100 for residential customers and Php1,500 for business customers. New products launched on a promotional basis or products bundled with existing services usually are combined with a waiver of the installation fee or allow for a minimal installation fee of Php500. Aside from basic monthly charges, we charge our postpaid subscribers separately for NDD, IDD and calls to mobile phones. Generally, calls between PLDT and other landlines within a local area code are free. Our prepaid fixed line customers do not pay a basic monthly charge but they can load a minimum amount of Php200, which will expire in a month, to have unlimited incoming calls. To make outbound calls, customers must top-up, as local calls are charged Php2.00 per call and tolls are charged separately depending on the type of call. We offer the Php300 load plan with 600 free local outgoing minutes and unlimited incoming calls for one month. To make outbound calls in excess of the free minutes, prepaid fixed line customers must top-up their load, with all local calls charged at Php2.00 per call while tolls are charged separately depending on the type of call.

PLDT offers both prepaid and postpaid PLP, where subscribers to the services benefit from a text-capable home phone which allows subscribers to bring the telephone set anywhere within the home zone area. These services are primarily intended for subscribers in areas where PLDT has no fixed cable facilities and is expected to increase our fixed line subscriber base.

Currently, the PLP postpaid regular service offers the following two plans: (i) Plan 600 and (ii) Plan 1,000, both of which include unlimited local outgoing calls. Another postpaid service currently offered is the Call All plan wherein PLP is bundled with PLDT fixed line service for a monthly service fee of Php850. PLDT also offers wireless broadband services bundled with voice, namely, HOME Bundle 1299 and Internet@HOME plans are offered in two plans with monthly service fees of Php990 and Php1,299.

For the PLP prepaid service, we now have the following three load plans being offered to the market: (i) Php300 load denomination with free 600 local outgoing minutes and unlimited incoming calls for one month; (ii) Php150 load denomination with free 250 local outgoing minutes and unlimited incoming calls valid for 15 days; and (iii) the new Php100 load denomination with 100 local outgoing minutes, 45MB-worth of internet and unlimited incoming calls valid for seven days. All prepaid plans charges Php2.00 per call in excess of free local outgoing minutes via top-up load.

Pursuant to a currency exchange rate adjustment, or CERA, a mechanism authorized by the NTC, we are allowed to adjust our postpaid monthly local service rates upward or downward by 1% for every Php0.10 change in the Philippine peso-to-U.S. dollar exchange rate relative to a base rate of Php11.00 to US$1.00. In a letter dated July 11, 2008, the NTC approved our request to implement a rate rationalization program for our local service rates. In 2016, we did not make any adjustment in our monthly local service rates. For a detailed description of these rates, see “– International Service – Rates” and “– Domestic Service – Rates” and Item 3. “Key Information – Risk Factors – Risks Relating to Us – Our business is significantly affected by governmental laws and regulations, including regulations in respect of rates and taxes and laws relating to anti-competitive practices and monopoly.”

In the first quarter of 2005, HB No. 926 was filed and is pending in the House of Representatives of the Philippines. The proposed bill provides for the cancellation of the currency exchange rate mechanism currently in place. If this bill is passed into law or if the NTC issues guidelines to change the basis of the currency exchange rate mechanism, our ability to generate U.S. dollar linked revenues from our local exchange business could be adversely affected.

International Service

Our international service consists of switched voice and packet-based voice services and data services that go through our IGFs. We also generate international revenues through access charges paid to us by other Philippine telecommunications carriers for incoming international voice calls that terminate on our local exchange network. Our voice services are transmitted over the traditional Time-Division Multiplexing and IP networks. Revenues from our fixed line international service amounted to Php8,056 million in 2016, Php9,219 million in 2015 and Php11,404 million in 2014.

The continued popularity of OTT services that offer free on-net calling services (such as Skype, Viber, Line, Facebook Messenger, GoogleTalk and WhatsApp, and similar services), have negatively impacted the international call volumes of PLDT in 2016.

We have been pursuing a number of initiatives to sustain our international service business, including: (i) adjusting our inbound termination rates; (ii) identifying and containing unauthorized traffic termination on our network; (iii) interconnecting popular communication service providers (like Skype and Viber); and (iv) introducing a number of marketing initiatives, including cuts in international direct dialing rates, innovative pricing packages for large accounts and loyalty programs for customers. In addition, PLDT Global is also enhancing the presence of PLDT in other international markets by offering products and services such as international prepaid calling cards, virtual mobile services, SMS transit and other global bandwidth services. These strategies are intended to help us maximize the use of our existing international facilities, and develop alternative sources of revenue.

 

30


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth the net settlement amounts for international calls handled by PLDT, by country, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

     Net Settlement  
     2016      2015      2014  
            (in millions)         

Saudi Arabia

   US$ 43      US$ 58      US$ 93  

United Arab Emirates

     28        25        19  

United States

     15        12        17  

Hong Kong

     7        8        7  

Canada

     6        7        9  

UK

     3        3        3  

Malaysia

     2        6        10  

Japan

     2        3        4  

Taiwan

     2        3        4  

Others

     7        12        13  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   US$ 115      US$ 137      US$ 179  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Rates

The average termination rate for PLDT was approximately US$0.085 in 2016 and 2015, and approximately US$0.09 per minute in 2014.

Rates for outbound international calls are based on type of service, whether operator-assisted or direct-dialed. Our rates are quoted in U.S. dollars and are billed in Philippine pesos. The Philippine peso amounts are determined at the time of billing. We charge a flat rate of US$0.40 per minute to retail customers for direct-dialed calls, applicable to all call destinations at any time on any day of the week.

We also offer international service through PLDT Budget Card, a prepaid call card, which offers low-priced international calling services to 101 calling destinations/countries (including 12 Middle East destinations) with rates ranging from Php1.50 per minute to Php15.00 per minute. PLDT Budget Card comes in two denominations: Php100, which can be consumed within 30 days from first use, and Php200, which can be consumed within 60 days from first use.

We also offer lower international rates such as ID-DSL which has a monthly service fee of Php99 with 30 minutes of free calls to selected countries and a rate of as low as Php1.00 per minute for calls in excess of free minutes.

Domestic Service

Our domestic services are provided primarily through PLDT. This service consists of voice services for calls made by our fixed line customers outside of their local service areas within the Philippines and access charges paid to us by other telecommunications carriers for wireless and fixed line calls carried through our backbone network and/or terminating to our fixed line customers. Revenues from our domestic service amounted to Php3,782 million in 2016, Php3,958 million in 2015 and Php4,365 million in 2014.

Mobile substitution, OTT voice call alternatives and the widespread availability and growing popularity of alternative, more economical non-voice means of communications, particularly e-mailing, SMS, social networking sites and OTT services, have negatively affected our domestic call volumes.

Rates

Rates for domestic calls traditionally were based on type of service, such as whether the call is operator-assisted or direct-dialed. However, in line with its move towards rate simplification, PLDT simplified these rates in recent years for calls originating from and terminating to the PLDT fixed line network and for calls terminating to fixed line networks of other LECs. PLDT also simplified its rates for calls terminating to mobile subscribers.

In addition, PLDT bundles the free PLDT-to-PLDT calls in some promotions and product/service launchings in order to stimulate fixed line usage.

We continue to evaluate the rate structure of our domestic services from per minute toll charges to flat rates per call for calls of unlimited duration. This is envisioned to make fixed line rates more competitive with VoIP rates and to revitalize interest in fixed line usage. We continue to study various pricing models in respect of the above new rate plans.

PLDT currently has interconnection arrangements with the majority of other LECs, pursuant to which the originating carrier pays: (1) a hauling charge of Php0.50 per minute for short-haul traffic or Php1.25 per minute for long-haul traffic to the carrier owning the backbone network, and (2) an access charge ranging from Php1.00 per minute to Php3.00 per minute to the terminating carrier. PLDT still maintains revenue-sharing arrangements with a few other LECs, whereby charges are generally apportioned 30% for the originating entity, 40% for the backbone owner and the remaining 30% for the terminating entity.

 

31


Table of Contents

Data Services

Our data service revenues include charges for broadband, leased lines, Ethernet-based and IP-based services. These services are used for broadband internet, and domestic and international private data networking communications.

The following table summarizes key measures of our data services as at and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

     December 31,  
     2016     2015     2014  

Systemwide home broadband subscriber base

     1,450,550       1,255,864       1,149,328  

Growth rate of home broadband subscribers

     16     9     17

Data service revenues (in millions)

   Php 37,711     Php 33,748     Php 30,332  

Home broadband

     14,896       12,338       10,935  

Corporate data and leased lines

     19,980       18,806       17,325  

Data Center and IT

     2,835       2,604       2,072  

Percentage to fixed line service revenues

      

Home broadband

     22     19     17

Corporate data and leased lines

     29     29     27

Data Center and IT

     4     4     3

Percentage of data service revenues to total service revenues

     55     52     47

Recognizing the growth potential of data services, and in light of their importance to our business strategy, we have been putting considerable emphasis on these service segments. These segments registered the highest percentage growth in revenues among our fixed line services from 2014 to 2016. Revenues from our data services amounted to Php37,711 million in 2016, Php33,748 million in 2015 and Php30,332 million in 2014.

The continuous upgrade and expansion of our network using next-generation technologies and our thrust into expansion of our digital infrastructure and capabilities, have enabled us to offer a growing range of IT and digital services that cater to the evolving needs of our customers.

Domestic data services consist of broadband data services and private networking solutions such as IP-VPN, Metro Ethernet and leased lines, among others. In 2016, we continued to broaden our service offerings through the expansion and enhancement of some of our existing offerings.

Broadband data services provided by our PLDT HOME include: (i) DSL broadband internet service, which is intended for individual internet users, small and medium enterprises, and large corporations with multiple branches; and (ii) Fibr, our most advanced broadband service for high-speed service which is delivered over fiber optic cable connectivity.

In 2015, PLDT HOME introduced new bandwidth variants of DSL offerings for businesses with speeds going as high as 20 Mbps and hardware bundle options where large enterprise customers are able to get top-of-the-line, branded IT devices of their choice. Fibr also evolved, as we introduced several bandwidth variants, this time offering higher speeds that can go up to 100 Mbps.

PLDT HOME remains to be the nation’s leading home broadband service provider, serving over 1.4 million subscribers nationwide. In addition to network expansion, PLDT HOME is also aggressively modernizing and upgrading its current copper network through the use of new technologies such as Very-high-bit-rate, or VDSL, which delivers speeds of up to 100 Mbps. Pilot testing of G.Fast and Gigawire technologies are also currently underway, which would allow subscribers to enjoy speeds of up to 500 Mbps on their copper lines.

PLDT HOME is strongly committed to fulfill our subscribers’ digital home lifestyle needs through conveniently and strategically bundled packages with our core data service. PLDT HOME was first to market such services under the Connected Home banner, reaching close to half a million digital services nationwide.

Consistent with its goal of always spearheading innovation for the home, PLDT launched the Smart Home digital services in 2016. The Smart Home digital ecosystem is built on the pillars of connectivity, peace of mind, entertainment, and convergence. The connectivity that binds the Smart Home is best experienced through devices such as the Telpad (the world’s first landline, broadband and tablet service in one) and the TVolution (which turns an ordinary TV into a smart TV), supported by Home Fibr’s fastest Internet speeds of up to 1 Gbps. This allows for high-speed browsing of multiple websites and the country’s first symmetrical speed service which provides equal upload and download speeds.

PLDT HOME also pioneered the ‘peace of mind’ suite which features security-enhancing products such as the home monitoring system Fam Cam launched in partnership with network solutions giant D-Link; the online safety solution Fam Zone which is Australia’s leading online parental control platform; and the multi-functional kiddie gadget Smart Watch manufactured by global telecommunications company Alcatel.

PLDT HOME has always been at the forefront of providing subscribers with diverse and compelling bundled content through its partnerships with globally renowned content providers. These partners include iflix, Southeast Asia’s internet TV service provider; Netflix, the U.S.-based internet TV pioneer; Cignal Digital TV, the Philippine’s pay TV service provider; Fox International Channels, which offers a wide range of video-on-demand, live content and catch-up TV; and ABS-CBN’s iWanTV, an OTT content platform in the Philippines.

 

32


Table of Contents

PLDT HOME is also a leader in the convergence of wired and wireless connections through its data sharing feature which allows subscribers to seamlessly share data with their Smart mobile phones, thus revolutionizing the way families share and enjoy their high-speed connection. The data sharing bundle also allows subscribers to conveniently upgrade their mobile devices to the latest iPhone plans or bundle their home broadband service with a Smart Bro Pocket WiFi so they can enjoy strong connections even outside the home.

Leased lines and other data services include: (i) Diginet, a domestic private leased line service, specifically supporting Smart’s fiber optic and leased line network requirements; (ii) IP-VPN, an end-to-end managed IP-based or Layer 3 data networking service that offers secure means to access corporate network resources; (iii) Metro Ethernet, a high-speed, Layer 2, wide area networking service that enables mission-critical data transfers; (iv) Shops.Work, a connectivity solution designed for retailers and franchisers, linking company branches to the head office; and (v) Shops.Work UnPlugged, or SWUP, a wireless VPN service that powers mobile point-of-sale terminals and off-site bank ATMs, as well as other retail outlets located in remote areas.

International leased lines and other data services consist mainly of: (i) i-Gate, our premium, direct internet access service, which continues to be the choice among enterprise users for dedicated internet connectivity, where users can be provided with as much as 1,000 Mbps of direct i-Gate internet bandwidth, complemented by industry-leading Service Level Agreements; (ii) Fibernet, which provides cost-effective, managed and resilient international high bandwidth point-to-point private data networking connectivity, through our global points of presence and extensive international alliances, to offshore and outsourcing, banking and finance, and semiconductor industries; and (iii) other international managed data services in partnership with other global service providers, which provide data networking services to multinational companies.

In 2013, PLDT launched a fully meshed and managed international platform to the U.S. and Hong Kong designed for automatic switching and rerouting in milliseconds that enables various international submarine cables to act as multiple protections while promoting single connectivity. This platform provides subscribers a combination of low latency and high capacity services that allow uninterrupted service delivery and improved overall network service performance to customers who demand maximum uptime and availability on their business data, voice, video and other telecommunication needs.

In 2015, PLDT extended its global reach with new points of presence in the U.K. and the east coast of the United States, in addition to PLDT’s growing managed international network, which includes the west coast of the United States, Hong Kong and Singapore. 2016 saw the addition of a new international Point of Presence (PoP) in Sydney, Australia, which complements existing PoPs in the United States, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. PLDT’s sixth PoP further strengthens PLDT’s formidable global network, resulting in maximum international connectivity.

VITROTM data centers and IPC data centers, provide colocation and related connectivity services, managed server hosting, disaster recovery and business continuity services, managed security services, Cloud services, big data services and various managed IT solutions.

On July 28, 2016, ePLDT inaugurated VITRO Makati, the country’s biggest data center with 3,600 racks at full capacity and located in one of the country’s premiere business districts. VITRO Makati is equipped with highly-resilient systems and facilities to guarantee continuous operations, ensuring that businesses can utilize robust and scalable digital infrastructure, as well as world-class 24/7 technical support capabilities. As at December 31, 2016, ePLDT Group had a total of 6,797 rack capacity in seven locations covering Metro Manila, Subic and Cebu. ePLDT, PLDT’s IT subsidiary, manages and operates the four VITROTM data center facilities located in Pasig, Cebu, Subic and Makati, with a total of 12,108 square meters of server farm space (or 5,602 rack capacity), and IPC, ePLDT’s Cloud subsidiary, manages and operates the three IPC data center facilities located in Makati, Taguig and Sucat, with a total of 2,640 square meters of server farm space (or 1,195 rack capacity), to accommodate enterprise customers’ IT infrastructure hosting requirements. The facilities boast of best-in-class data center amenities in fully resilient configuration, supported by requisite operational certification attesting to compliance to global and industry recognized standards.

PLDT completed and commercially launched the Philippines’ first carrier-grade cloud infrastructure in 2012 and has consistently built partnerships with global Cloud brands and invested in expertise for professional services. The Group offers a full-suite of Cloud Solutions to clients such as Infrastructure-as-a-Service, Platform-as-a-Service, Software-as-a-Service, Unified Comms-as-a-Service, Contact-Center-as-a-Service, Desktop-as-a-Service, Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service, Coupa Spend Management and the Oracle Cloud Suite.

Complementing these capabilities are partnerships with AWS, Google, IBM-Softlayer, Salesforce.com, Netsuite, SAP, and Microsoft, among others where PLDT offers professional services beyond infrastructure and license-selling. Among the group’s cloud credentials and achievements are Google for Work Gold Partner, Microsoft Cloud Deployment Partner, Microsoft Cloud Services Partner, Microsoft Productivity Competency Gold Partner, SAP Gold Partner and Salesforce Premiere Partner.

PLDT, through its IT subsidiary, ePLDT, also provides big data services to enable local enterprises advance their businesses through a range of digitally transformative solutions. These solutions allow enterprises to analyze openly available data and gain insights that drive predictive and data-driven decision-making in their businesses. PLDT is also a member of the Open Data Platform, a worldwide consortium of big data global technology leaders that aims to standardize the core platform and accelerate big data delivery across markets. PLDT is the only ASEAN company in the ODP which has a membership of multinational companies including GE, Hortonworks, IBM, Infosys, Pivotal, SAS, and VMWare among others.

 

33


Table of Contents

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous services provide facilities management, outsourcing, rental fees, and other services which are conducted through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ePLDT, which, together with its subsidiaries, is a broad-based integrated information and communications technology company. Revenues from our miscellaneous services amounted to Php1,665 million in 2016, Php1,474 million in 2015 and Php1,419 million in 2014.

Infrastructure

Wireless Network Infrastructure

Mobile

Through Smart and DMPI, we operate a digital GSM network. To meet the growing demand for mobile services, Smart and DMPI have implemented an extensive deployment program for their GSM network covering substantially all of Metropolitan Manila and most of the other population centers in the Philippines.

Smart has been colocating its cell sites where its base stations are installed with PLDT and DMPI. In addition, 25 of Smart’s mobile switching centers were housed in PLDT’s fixed line complexes as at December 31, 2016. These operational synergies have allowed Smart to reduce switch installation time from three months to five weeks.

Smart has been continually extending its 3G footprint. The 3G network provides more capacity, faster data rates and richer data and video applications from a 2G network. Smart has also been deploying its HSPA+ network in urban areas where there is a demand for mobile broadband applications and where HSPA+ mobile units are more likely to be available.

Smart launched its 4G LTE network in August 2012. To date, Smart has established its LTE network coverage with 3,842 LTE base stations in strategic locations in the Philippines.

In 2016, PLDT and Smart have also rolled-out carrier-grade Smart WiFi in key transport hubs, identified by the Department of Transportation, in line with the PLDT Group’s commitment to make internet available to the public at world-class speeds for a seamless digital experience. Smart WiFi is likewise scheduled for rollout in more regional airports, sea ports, and the rail-based MRT and LRT lines 1 and 2 in Metro Manila, and the rest of the country, in the coming months. Forthcoming are deployments in select high traffic areas in the nation’s capital and strategic locations to benefit more members of the Philippine population.

Home Broadband and Other Services

Home Broadband offers fixed wireless broadband internet connectivity to both residential and corporate clients. It also maintains and operates WiFi hotspots installations that serve mobile internet users. Smart also upgraded its 3G network to High-Speed Downlink Packet Access to provide users with high download data rates and an improved broadband experience. Roughly 4,000 of Smart’s base stations are now fixed wireless broadband-capable, covering most of the key cities and the other populated centers in the country. These are strategically colocated in Smart’s mobile base stations that allow it to efficiently reach many subscribers. For its backbone, it uses the nationwide PLDT and Smart fiber optic and IP backbone that provide substantial bandwidth capacity to utilize and to grow on demand.

Fixed Line Network Infrastructure

Domestic

Our domestic telephone network includes installed telephones and other equipment, such as modems on customers’ premises, copper and fiber access lines referred to as “outside plant connecting customers to our exchanges,” inter-exchange fiber optics connecting exchanges, and long distance transmission equipment with unmatched capacity and reach. As at December 31, 2016, we have managed to modernize NGN soft switches including international gateways, and are continually expanding the wireline infrastructure in areas we believe are unserved and underserved areas enabling our customers to access to the Philippines’ largest network and to the rest of the world.

In early 2016, we completed the upgrade of our fixed line facilities to fully IP-based platforms that can deliver voice and data services using a copper or fiber line to the customer with improved quality of service. This migration initiative enables us to fully replace the aging Public Switched Telephone Network, or PSTN, and transfer existing customers to these newer platforms, in an effort to ensure the best service for new customers of voice and data services for their present and future needs with a diversified range of telecommunication services using IP technology.

One of these platforms, FTTH, is an advanced access technology that employs fiber optics all the way up to customer premises. To realize this, we are building a fiber distribution network that will connect homes and other premises to further ensure good internet quality even kilometers away from the serving exchange. This new optical fiber distribution network will eventually replace conventional copper cable. At present, FTTH is potentially capable of delivering up to 2.5 Gigabits per second, or 1 Gbps, download speed. Its huge bandwidth enables us to deliver high-bandwidth content and services to our subscribers. These include high definition broadcast television, video-on-demand, and other new services being offered by leading telecommunications companies outside the Philippines. We have been testing FTTH since 2006 and in 2012 began deploying FTTH in high-end and selected upper middle villages in Metropolitan Manila. Initially, we are deploying FTTH in greenfield areas. In the last quarter of 2015, we started deploying it in existing service areas to support the growing demand for higher DSL speed. With the intention to maximize the existing copper cable to deliver high speed broadband, PLDT adopted VDSL technology in vertical deployments (buildings) to provide data rates up to 100Mbps simultaneously in both the upstream and downstream directions. PLDT has also recently adopted the new capabilities such as G.FAST and Gigawire to deliver even higher speed on copper.

 

34


Table of Contents

Along with PLDT’s pole infrastructures, we have been using the poles of Meralco to deploy the FTTH FOC Network in Metropolitan Manila and in the rest of Meralco’s service areas for PLDT’s outside plant aerial cable pursuant to lease agreements with Meralco. PLDT is also using the pole infrastructure of other electric utility companies outside Meralco’s service area.

Our network includes an internet gateway that is composed of high capacity and high performance routers that serve as our IP network gateway connecting the Philippines to the rest of the world. It provides premium and differentiated internet service to all types of customers ranging from ordinary broadband to high bandwidth internet requirements of corporate customers, knowledge processing solution providers, internet service providers, or ISPs, and even other service providers. Additionally, transparent caching service that are hosted in our domestic data centers provides a faster internet experience for customers. The caching facility includes well known websites such as Netflix, iflix, Google, Facebook and Amazon, among others.

Furthermore, we have several networks that provide domestic and international connectivity for corporate customers and other carriers. These include the Multi-Service Access Platform, or MSAP, based on Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, technology and legacy data networks that provide wide range of bandwidth from low speed to high speed capacity up to 1 Gbps. These MSAP networks are deployed in strategic areas nationwide.

In 2015, we completed Phase 6 deployment of our Carrier Ethernet Network, or CEN, covering more exchanges to serve the growing demand for high bandwidth or up to 10 Gbps Ethernet services from the corporate segment and prepare the network for efficient delivery of multimedia services. Carrier Ethernet service is a global standard for secure, scalable, resilient, cost effective, and high bandwidth point-to-point or multi-point connectivity using the simple and ubiquitous Ethernet technology delivered through PLDT’s MEF-certified CEN. It supports enterprise requirements such as data storage, headquarter to branch connectivity, headquarter to disaster recovery site connectivity, cloud services and backhaul for mobile/LTE services. PLDT’s CEN also serves as aggregation point for NGN and FTTH access nodes.

We likewise have an IP backbone network, or IPBB, composed of high-capacity, high-performance core and edge routers that provide IP connectivity to the different network elements built for PLDT, Smart, subsidiaries and affiliates and corporate customers. It serves as the common and highly resilient IP transport platform for all IP-based services of the PLDT Group.

The PLDT DFON is a nationwide backbone network. It is the first fiber optic backbone network in the country and is used to deliver voice, video, data, and other broadband and multimedia services nationwide. It is comprised of nodes connected by terrestrial and submarine cable links configured in 11 loops and two appendages extending to Palawan and Iligan. The DFON loops provide self-healing and alternative segment route protection for added resiliency against single and multiple fiber breaks along the different segments. The DFON uses the ROADM and 10/40/100G technology which give it greater flexibility for capacity and expansion. The network also includes interconnectivity among the three international cable landing stations of PLDT with its own backhaul capacity and resiliency under the same DFON platform. To date, the network has an aggregated loop capacity of nearly 7.4 Terabits per second. The DFON is complemented by a terrestrial microwave backbone network to deliver services to remote areas unreachable by the fixed terrestrial transport network. Both the DFON and IPBB serve as the common high bandwidth Fiber Optic Cable-based backbone for the PLDT Group. DFON is part of the 46,316 kilometer backbone and intermediate fiber optic cable of the PLDT Group.

Aside from the DFON and IPBB, the PLDT Group has embarked on further synergy initiatives to rationalize and integrate its networks which include, among others, the outside plant, the DSL network, the IP backbone, the transmission systems, the internet gateway, international voice gateway, the PSTN, and NGN. These initiatives are expected to complement and enhance coverage and capacity for all networks in the PLDT Group.

PLDT has also began a transport system transformation program, which includes the transformation of DFON, IP Backbone and carrier Ethernet network into a new architecture and technology in preparation for the provision of 5G services.

International

PLDT’s international network was designed and built to support mainstream as well as new IP-based international services including IDD and IP voice, messaging, international enterprise solutions, and the biggest use of international network resources today, internet services of the PLDT Group. The international network also supports in part requirements of the Company’s traditional, as well as MVNO operations in various locations in Asia, Europe and the United States, and the international retail business run by PLDT Global.

For voice services, PLDT operates two IP voice gateways. As at December 31, 2016, PLDT’s international long distance facilities allow direct voice correspondence with 85 foreign carriers from 44 countries and can reach almost a thousand foreign destinations (including fixed and wireless network destination “breakouts”, or specific areas within a country) worldwide.

The Company now has four international internet gateways. In addition to the three international internet gateways in operation in 2015, in June 2016, the Company put into service a fourth international internet gateway in Lucena. This fortifies the PLDT Group’s infrastructure for internet and IP network services, as well as connections of our fixed and wireless networks to content and internet services available from, and businesses connected to, the global internet. All these gateways employ high capacity, high performance routers, and together with ancillary facilities (such as security against network/service attacks), they provide premium and differentiated internet and/or IP services to all types of customers ranging from ordinary broadband to high bandwidth internet requirements of corporate customers, knowledge processing solution providers, ISPs and even other service providers. PLDT also operates three offshore/forward gateway routers in Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States to support optimized and direct access to content providers and businesses connected to the internet in Asia as well as the continental U.S.

 

35


Table of Contents

To localize international internet content, and therefore achieve the best latency and at the same time save on international costs, PLDT employs local transparent caching in addition to partnering with various popular internet content providers, which together have much improved our customers’ internet experience. To date, PLDT is able to cache/access locally high demand content including those from Google, Facebook and content hosted by CDN player, Akamai. The Company also signed in 2016 a local caching agreements with Microsoft and Netflix, whose dedicated local caching servers are expected to be operational by the first half of 2017. The servers employed in these caches are able to identify high demand content and store these locally.

To provide the international transport backbone for the voice and internet gateways as well as other international data services, PLDT operates the Philippines’ most extensive international submarine cable network. To date, PLDT maintains and operates three international cable landing stations in La Union and Batangas for international cables coming from the West Philippine Sea, and in Daet in the east for international cables coming from the Pacific Ocean. These international cable stations are connected by an advance terrestrial fiber mesh network (North, South and East Luzon systems) to our three International Transmission Maintenance Centers.

Connecting the country to the rest of the world via PLDT’s international cable stations are submarine cable systems in which PLDT had invested in and/or acquired capacities from, the most recent of which is in FASTER cable system, which connects Japan and U.S. Mainland. The table below shows submarine cable systems, in which PLDT has interests, that terminate in the Philippines or connect onward to other submarine cable systems from the Philippines, and the countries or territories they link:

 

Cable System

  

Countries Being Linked

Asia-Pacific Cable Network 2, or APCN2    Philippines, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, China and Taiwan
Southeast Asia-Middle East-Western Europe No. 3 Cable, or SEA-ME-WE-3    Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, Thailand, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Djibouti, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Cyprus, Turkey, Greece, Italy, Morocco, Portugal, France, UK, Belgium and Germany
Fiber-optic Loop Around the Globe, or FLAG, Cable    Japan, Korea, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand, India, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Italy, Spain and UK
Southern Cross Cable    U.S. Mainland, Hawaii, Fiji, Australia and New Zealand
East Asia Crossing, or EAC Cable    Japan, Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and the Philippines
Pacific Crossing-1, or PC1, Japan-U.S. Cable Network (JUCN), TGN-Pacific, Unity, FASTER    Japan and the U.S.
Asia-America Gateway, or AAG, Cable Network    Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Brunei, Hong Kong, Philippines, Guam, Hawaii and the U.S. Mainland
Asia Submarine-cable Express, or ASE    Philippines, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong
TGN-Intra Asia    Hong Kong and Japan

To further build on its footprint towards Europe and the Middle East, PLDT invested in the Asia Africa Europe Cable No. 1 (AAE-1). AAE1 is expected to be operational by the second half of 2017. Additionally, the Company is investing in new cable systems in the Pacific (together with major Asian carriers and OTT players) as well as in Asian region, both investments are being made to support the expected new fixed and mobile services requirements that will require significant bandwidth in 3-4 years’ time.

PLDT’s automatic optical transport switching system using multiple 10G backbone links continues to provide redundancy, minimize service disruptions, and provide continuity of service to premium enterprise clients as well as to PLDT for other important services. The capacity of the domestic portion of this switching network was upgraded in February 2016 in order to further strengthen PLDT’s international infrastructure and support the growing business requirements in Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and the continental U.S.

With regard to service enabling platforms, the Company’s Telco-in-a-box platform supports voice and data services that are being offered in various parts of the world to serve mainly overseas Filipinos. The platform provides real-time charging, self-care, dealer portal, campaign and loyalty capabilities, and facilitates the time to market for new international mainstream products and new digital products.

Interconnection Agreements

Since the issuance of E.O. No. 59 in 1993, which requires non-discriminatory interconnection of Philippine carriers’ networks, we have entered into bilateral interconnection arrangements with other Philippine fixed line and mobile carriers. See Item 4. “Information on the Company – Licenses and Regulations – Regulatory Tariffs” for further discussion.

 

36


Table of Contents

As at December 31, 2016, PLDT has direct interconnection agreements with 85 foreign carriers from 44 countries.

The average international termination rate for calls to PLDT was retained at approximately US$0.085 per minute in 2016. Also, PLDT carries international calls terminating at Smart and Sun networks where they have no direct interconnections.

The access charge for SMS from Smart to other CMTS operators and vice versa was reduced from Php0.35 per SMS to Php0.15 per SMS effective November 30, 2011, as mandated by the NTC through MC No. 02-10-2011.

Licenses and Regulations

Licenses

The table below shows the expiry dates of franchises for each company indicated:

 

Company

  

Expiry Date of Franchises

PLDT    November 28, 2028
SubicTel    January 22, 2020
Clarktel    June 30, 2024
Philcom    November 2019
Digitel    February 2019
Smart    April 15, 2017
Spectrum transferred from PCEV    May 14, 2019
SBI    July 14, 2022
DMPI    December 11, 2027
CURE*    April 24, 2026

 

* In the case of CURE, PLDT has agreed to divest the CURE spectrum as a part of the NTC decision with respect to PLDT’s acquisition of a controlling interest in Digitel.

A franchise holder is required to obtain operating authority from the NTC to provide specific telecommunications services authorized under its franchise. These approvals may take the form of a CPCN, or, while an application for a CPCN is pending, a provisional authority to operate. Provisional authorities are typically granted for a period of 18 months. The Philippine Revised Administrative Code of 1987 provides that if the grantee of a license or permit, such as a CPCN or provisional authority, has made timely and sufficient application for the extension thereof, the existing CPCN or provisional authority will not expire until the application is finally decided upon by the administrative agency concerned.

The following table sets forth the spectrum system service/technology, licensed frequency bands and bandwidth assignments used by Smart, DMPI, SBI and PDSI:

 

Assignees

  

Service/Technology

  

Bands (in MHz)

  

Bandwidth Assignment

Smart    3G-WCDMA    850    10 MHz x 2
   GSM 900    900    7.5 MHz x 2
   GSM 1800    1800    20 MHz x 2
   3G-WCDMA    2100    15 MHz x 2
DMPI    CDMA 2000    1900    2 channels of 1.25 MHz of bandwidth
   3G-WCDMA    2100    10 MHz x 2
   TD-LTE    2500    15 MHz
   TD-LTE    3400    30 MHz
   GSM 1800    1800    17.5 MHz x 2
SBI    TD-LTE    2500    20 MHz
   TD-LTE    3400    30 MHz
PDSI    TD-LTE    2300    30 MHz

 

* NTC approved the frequency co-use arrangement between Smart and Globe of various frequencies under LTE 700, GSM/3G 900, GSM/LTE 1800, BWA/LTE 2300, and LTE 2500 assigned to Bell Telecommunications Philippines, Inc.

As a condition of our acquisition of a controlling interest in Digitel, we have agreed with the NTC that we will divest the congressional franchise, spectrum and related permits held by CURE following the migration of CURE’s Red Mobile subscriber base to Smart. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Divestment of CURE to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18 “Financial Statements” for further discussion.

Material Effects of Regulation on our Business

Operators of IGFs and mobile telephone operators, pursuant to E.O. No. 109, are required to install a minimum number of local exchange lines. Of these new lines, operators are required to install one rural exchange line for every ten urban exchange lines installed. Smart and PCEV were required to install 700,000 and 400,000 rural lines, respectively, and each has received a certificate of compliance from the NTC.

PLDT, SubicTel, ClarkTel, Philcom, Smart, Digitel, PCEV, SBI and CURE are required to pay various permits, regulation and supervision fees to the NTC. PLDT was previously engaged in disputes with the NTC over some of the assessed fees.

 

37


Table of Contents

The NTC has issued a number of directives that regulate the manner in which we conduct our business:

 

   

On July 3, 2009, the NTC issued MC No. 03-07-2009, imposing an extension of the expiration of the prepaid loads from two months to various expiration periods ranging from three days to 120 days. Smart and DMPI have been implementing the new validity period of prepaid loads since July 19, 2009.

 

   

On July 7, 2009, the NTC amended its rules on broadcast messaging in MC No. 04-07-2009, which prohibits content and/or information providers from initiating push messages. It further requires that requests for services must be initiated by the subscribers and not forced upon them by the public telecommunications entities and/or content providers and mandates that subscribers be sent a notification when they subscribe for any service and be given an option whether to continue with the availed service.

 

   

On July 23, 2009, the NTC issued MC No. 05-07-2009 mandating mobile operators, including Smart, to charge calls on a maximum six-second per pulse basis instead of the previous per minute basis whether the subscriber is prepaid or postpaid. Smart and CURE have filed petitions with the Supreme Court challenging the implementation of this regulation which remain pending. The six-second per pulse billing scheme is expected to have a negative impact on Smart’s revenue, profit and ARPU as this is expected to decrease the amount of time billed per call as a result of moving to shorter billing intervals of six seconds from the previous one minute.

 

   

On February 18, 2011, the NTC issued MC No. 01-02-2011 which among others required mobile phone providers like Smart and DMPI to make internet access through mobile phones optional; inform their subscribers of charges for internet access through mobile phones; and remind subscribers through SMS if at least 50% of credit limit has already been consumed.

 

   

On October 24, 2011, the NTC issued MC No. 02-10-2011 which mandates that interconnection charge for SMS between two separate networks shall not be higher than Php0.15 per SMS. Accordingly, Smart amended its interconnection agreements with other SMS providers in compliance with the circular. However, the NTC subsequently directed Smart to reduce the retail price of users sending regular SMS to users on other networks from Php1.00 to Php0.80 or less; refund or reimburse its subscribers for the excess Php0.20 per off-net SMS; pay a fine of Php200 per day from December 1, 2011 until the date of compliance with the decision; and submit documents, records and reports pertaining to SMS sent to other networks. Smart has challenged this decision and the resolution before the Court of Appeals. On June 27, 2016, the Court of Appeals rendered a decision setting aside the Decision dated November 20, 2012 and Resolution dated May 07, 2014 of the NTC for being bereft of legal basis and for having been rendered in utter disregard of the requirements of due process. The Court of Appeals further permanently enjoined the NTC and any and all of its agents from implementing the MC No. 02-10-2011. NTC and Intervenor Bayan Muna filed their respective Motions for Reconsideration which remain pending.

 

   

On July 15, 2011, the NTC issued MC No. 7-7-2011 which requires broadband service providers to specify the minimum broadband/internet connection speed and service reliability and the service rates in advertisements, flyers, brochures and service agreements and also sets the minimum service reliability of broadband service to 80%.

 

   

On December 19, 2011, the NTC issued a Decision in NTC ADM Case 2009-048 which lowered the interconnection charge between LEC and CMTS to Php2.50 per minute from Php4.00 per minute for LEC to CMTS and Php3.00 per minute from CMTS to LEC. PLDT and Smart individually filed on February 1, 2012 and January 20, 2012, respectively, separate motions for reconsideration arguing (among other things) that interconnection, including the rates thereof, should be, by law, a product of bilateral negotiations between the parties and that the decision to set lower rates was unconstitutional as an invalid exercise by the NTC of its quasi-legislative powers and violates the constitutional guarantee against non-impairment of contracts. The NTC denied the motion and PLDT and Smart appealed to the Court of Appeals, reiterating among other things, that the NTC erred in ruling that all LECs are automatically entitled to a cross-subsidy; that the NTC decision violates PLDT and Smart’s right to due process; and that the NTC decision violates the constitutional proscription against non-impairment of contracts. On December 12, 2014, the Court of Appeals granted Smart’s petition for review and set aside the NTC decision dated December 19, 2011. PAPTELCO has also filed a motion for reconsideration which was denied by the Court of Appeals in a Resolution dated September 18, 2015. A Petition for Review was filed by PAPTELCO before the Supreme Court which remains pending.

 

   

On July 8, 2015, the NTC issued MC No. 07-08-2015 defining “broadband” for fixed-line services, fixing data connection speed of at least 256 kilobits per second and mandating that ISPs must specify the average downstream and upstream data rates offered per area. Also, advertisements, flyers and brochures of service offers must specify service rates for broadband or internet connection data plans, and ISPs are allowed to set a cap on the data volume for each service package, provided that subscribers are automatically informed when the data volume consumed has reached specified thresholds.

In order to diversify the ownership base of public utilities, the Public Telecommunications Policy Act R.A. 7925, requires a telecommunications entity with regulated types of services to make a public offering through the stock exchanges of its shares representing at least 30% of its aggregate common shares within five years from: (a) the date the law became effective; or (b) the entity’s commencement of commercial operations, whichever date is later. PLDT and PCEV have complied with this requirement. Although Smart and DMPI have not conducted a public offering of their shares, Smart’s recently renewed franchise contains an exemption from the requirement to do so, provided it remains “wholly-owned by a publicly-listed company with at least 30% of whose authorized capital stock is publicly owned.”

 

38


Table of Contents

However, if DMPI is found to be in violation of R.A. 7925, this could result in the revocation of the franchise of DMPI and possible filing of a quo warranto case against DMPI by the Office of the Solicitor General of the Philippines. DMPI takes the position that the provisions of R.A. 7925 are merely directory and the policy underlying the requirement of telecommunications entities to conduct a public offering should be deemed to have been achieved when PLDT acquired a 100% equity interest in DMPI in 2011, since PLDT continues to be a publicly-listed company. However, there can be no assurance that, for DMPI, the Philippine Congress will agree with such position.

See Item 3. “Key Information – Risk Factors – Risks Relating to Us – Our business is significantly affected by governmental laws and regulations, including regulations in respect of our franchises, rates and taxes, and laws relating to anti-competitive practices and monopoly” for further discussion.

On April 14, 2009, the NTC released the implementing guidelines on developing reference access offers, which are statements of the prices, terms and conditions under which a telecommunications carrier proposes to provide access to its network or facilities to another such carrier or value-added service provider.

Regulatory Tariffs

In January 2009, the access charge for domestic calls from one fixed line to a fixed line in another network was updated to the range of Php1.00 per minute to Php3.00 per minute while the access charge for calls from fixed line to CMTS was updated to Php4.00 per minute. The access charge for CMTS calls to fixed line network remained at Php3.00 per minute.

PLDT is an Inter-Exchange Carrier providing transit service among CMTS, LEC operators including the PAPTELCO and non-PAPTELCO. Transit is a service being provided by PLDT to connect calls from one carrier to other carriers most of which have no direct interconnection. Since January 2009, PLDT’s transit fee remains at Php0.50 per minute for short haul (intra-island), Php1.25 per minute for long-haul (inter-island) and Php1.14 per minute for CMTS calls.

On November 24, 2016, the NTC issued MC No. 09-11-2016 entitled Interconnection Charge for Voice Services mandating that interconnection charge for voice calls between two separate networks shall not be higher than Php2.50 per minute. The MC likewise directed that existing interconnection agreements shall be amended to comply with this MC within 10 days from the effectivity of this MC. The new agreed reduced interconnection charges shall be effective not later than January 1, 2017 to give sufficient time for the necessary adjustment in the operators’ respective billing systems.

PLDT has continually and actively negotiated with other legitimate Philippine fixed and CMTS carriers for interconnection based on the guidelines being issued by the NTC or any authorized government agency. These carriers include the major fixed and mobile players in the industry with nationwide operations, PAPTELCO and other non-PAPTELCO players, both of which usually operate in selected towns in the countryside. As at December 31, 2016, PAPTELCO has 36 member companies, of which 31 are active, operating 73 main telephone exchanges in the countryside.

Competition

Including us, there are three major LECs, eight major IGF providers and two major mobile operators in the Philippines. Some new entrants into the Philippine telecommunications market have entered into strategic alliances with foreign telecommunications companies, which provide them access to technological and funding support as well as service innovations and marketing strategies.

Mobile Service

Currently, there are only two major mobile operators, namely us and Globe. Mobile market penetration in the Philippines is in excess of 100% based on SIM ownership.

Competition in the mobile telecommunications industry has intensified starting the middle of 2010 with greater availability of unlimited offers from the telecommunications operators resulting in increased volumes of calls and texts but declining yields. Even after PLDT’s acquisition of the Digitel Group in the last quarter of 2011, Globe continued to compete aggressively to gain revenue market share, albeit on a more regional/localized basis. Competition also increased in the postpaid space with more aggressive promotions involving greater handset subsidies. The principal bases of competition are price, including handset prices in the case of postpaid plans, quality of service, network reliability, geographic coverage and attractiveness of packaged services, including video content.

In recent years, the prevalence of OTT services, such as social media, instant messaging and internet telephone, also known as VoIP services, has greatly affected our legacy revenues namely voice and SMS. We are also facing growing competition from providers offering services using alternative wireless technologies and IP-based networks, including efforts by the Philippine government to roll-out its free WiFi services to various municipalities in the country.

 

39


Table of Contents

Voice

Local Exchange

Although the growth of the fixed line voice market has been impacted by higher demand for mobile services, we have sustained our leading position in the fixed line market on account of PLDT’s extensive network in key cities nationwide. In most areas, we face one or two competitors. Our principal competitors in the local exchange market, Globe and Bayan Telecommunications, Inc., or Bayan, provide local exchange service through both fixed and fixed wireless landline services. In July 2015, Globe increased its shareholdings in Bayan to 98.57% from 56.87%.

Fixed wireless landline services resemble a mobile phone service but provide the same tariff structure as a fixed line service such as the charging of monthly service fees. Our major competitors, Globe and Bayan, offer services in limited areas of Metropolitan Manila such as Makati, Las Piñas, the Visayas region and selected areas of Southern Luzon such as Cavite and Batangas.

International

There are 10 licensed IGF operators in the country, including us. While we still maintain a leadership position in this highly competitive service segment of the industry, our market share in recent years has declined as a result of: (1) competition from other IGF operators; (2) migration from fixed to direct mobile calling; and (3) the popularity of alternative and cheaper modes of communication such as e-mail, instant messaging, social-networking (such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram), including “free services” over the internet (such as Skype, Viber, Line, Facebook Messenger, GoogleTalk and WhatsApp, and similar services), and the establishment of virtual private networks for several corporate entities, which have further heightened competition.

With respect to outbound calls from the Philippines, we compete for market share through our local exchange and mobile businesses, which are the origination points of outbound international calls. We also have introduced a number of marketing initiatives to stimulate growth of outbound call volumes, including tariff reductions and volume discounts for large corporate subscribers.

The number of inbound calls into the Philippines has been negatively impacted by the popularity of OTT services due to further improvement of internet access and the increase in smartphone and tablet adoption as a result of intense local competition. We have been pursuing a number of initiatives to mitigate the decline in our inbound telecommunications traffic, including a modest reduction of our termination rates, marketing and promotions to call Philippines and PLDT Fixed at popular Filipino websites, interconnecting with OTT providers like Skype and Viber in order to directly capture their organic traffic to the Philippines and continuously identifying and limiting unauthorized traffic termination. In addition, we have also established presence, through our wholly-owned subsidiary PLDT Global, in key cities overseas to identify and capture Philippine terminating traffic at its source, maximize the use of our international facilities and develop alternative sources of revenue.

Domestic

Our domestic service business has been negatively affected by the growing number of mobile subscribers in the Philippines and the widespread availability and growing popularity of alternative economical non-voice methods of communication, particularly SMS and e-mail. In addition, various ISPs have launched voice services via the internet to their subscribers nationwide.

While domestic call volumes have been declining, we have remained the leading provider of domestic service in the Philippines due to our significant subscriber base and ownership of the Philippines’ most extensive transmission network.

From time to time, PLDT launches promotions bundled with our other products to attract new subscribers including free PLDT-to-PLDT NDD service.

Data Services

The market for data services is a growing segment in the Philippine telecommunications industry. This development has been spurred by the significant growth in consumer and retail broadband internet access, enterprise resource planning applications, customer relationship management, knowledge processing solutions, online gaming and other e-services that drive the need for broadband and internet-protocol based solutions both in the Philippines and abroad. Our major competitors in this area are Globe and Bayan. The principal bases of competition in the data services market are coverage, price, content, value for money, bundles or free gifts, customer service and quality of service. PLDT intends to compete in this segment, consistent with its overall strategy to broaden its distribution platform and increase its ability to deliver multimedia content.

 

40


Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

The Company has continuously demonstrated its commitment to complying with environmental laws. The Property Facilities – Risk Management and Compliance Division with Facilities Management and Network Operation Teams intensified collaboration with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, or DENR, Regional Offices on compliance matters. Among the major programs implemented in 2016 are the following:

 

   

Continuing training, accreditation and reporting to DENR Regional Offices of Company-appointed Pollution Control Officers, or PCO. The program was intended to meet the required PCO in the regions and address timely compliance of sites.

 

   

Periodic air sampling on standby generator sets showing acceptable results with all tested generator sets meeting the National Emission Standards for Source Specific Air Pollutants.

 

   

Regular facilitation of site-specific permits primarily on Permit to Operate Air Pollution Source Installation for sites with standby generator set and Hazardous Waste Registration for sites that generate used oil, used batteries, busted mercury-containing lamps, among others.

 

   

Completion of Sewage Treatment Plant in PLDT-Sampaloc Manila Office assuring acceptable quality to standards of wastewater discharge to public sewer.

The Company has not been subjected to any significant fines or regulatory action involving non-compliance with environmental regulations of the Philippines. Compliance to environmental regulations is always a top priority of the Company and above all to protect and preserve the environment where the Company operates.

Intellectual Property Rights

We do not own any material intellectual property rights apart from our brand names and logos. We are not dependent on patents, licenses or other intellectual property which are material to our business or results of operations, other than licenses to use the software that accompany most of our equipment purchases and licenses for certain contents used in VAS of our wireless business. See Note 15 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Properties

PLDT owns four office buildings located in Makati City and owns and operates 291 fixed line exchanges nationwide, of which 48 are located in the Metropolitan Manila area, including Digital Telecommunication Philippines Inc.’s, or DTPI’s, three exchanges. The remaining 243 exchanges, including DTPI’s 32 exchanges, are located in cities and small municipalities outside the Metropolitan Manila area. We also own radio transmitting and receiving equipment used for international and domestic communications.

As at December 31, 2016, our principal properties, excluding property under construction, consisted of the following, based on net book values:

 

   

73% consisted of cable, wire and mobile facilities, including our DFON, subscriber cable facilities, inter-office trunking and toll cable facilities and mobile facilities;

 

   

12% consisted of central office equipment, including IGFs, pure national toll exchanges and combined local and toll exchanges;

 

   

8% consisted of land and improvements and buildings, which we acquired to house our telecommunications equipment, personnel, inventory and/or fleet;

 

   

2% consisted of information origination and termination equipment, including pay telephones and radio equipment installed for customers use, and cables and wires installed within customers’ premises; and

 

   

5% consisted of other work equipment.

For more information on these properties, see Note 9 – Property and Equipment to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

These properties are located in areas where our subscribers are being served. In our opinion, these properties are in good condition, except for ordinary wear and tear, and are adequately insured.

The majority of our connecting lines are above or under public streets and properties owned by others. For example, for many years, the PLDT Group has been using the power pole network of Meralco in Metropolitan Manila for PLDT’s fixed line aerial cables in this area pursuant to short-term lease agreements with Meralco with typically five-year and more recently one-year terms.

The PLDT Group has various lease contracts for periods ranging from one to ten years covering certain offices, warehouses, cell sites, telecommunications equipment locations and various office equipment. For more information on the obligations relating to these properties and long-term obligations, see Note 21 – Interest-Bearing Financial Liabilities and Note 28 – Financial Assets and Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

 

41


Table of Contents

In 2017, we expect that cash from operations should enable us to increase the level of our capital expenditures for the continued expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure. We expect to make additional investments in our core facilities to leverage existing technologies and increase capacity. Our 2017 estimated consolidated capital expenditures is approximately Php46 billion, of which approximately Php29 billion is estimated to be spent by our wireless segment and approximately Php17 billion is estimated to be spent by our fixed line segment. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Plans” for further discussion on our capital expenditures.

 

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements (and the related notes) as at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and our future financial performance. These statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of particular factors such as those set forth under “Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 3. “Key Information – Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. Our consolidated financial statements, and the financial information discussed below, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. For convenience, certain Philippine peso financial information in the following discussions has been converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at December 31, 2016 of Php49.77 to US$1.00, as quoted through the Philippine Dealing System.

Overview

We are the largest and most diversified telecommunications company delivering data and multimedia services in the Philippines. We have organized our business into business units based on our products and services and have three reportable operating segments which serve as bases for management’s decision to allocate resources and evaluate operating performance: wireless, fixed line and others. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for further information on each of these segments.

Key performance indicators and drivers that our management uses to monitor and direct the operation of our businesses include, among others, the general economic conditions in the Philippines; market trends such as customer demands, behavior and satisfaction parameters; technological developments; network performance (in terms of speed, coverage and capacity); market share and profitability.

In addition, our results of operations and financial position are increasingly affected by fluctuations of the Philippine peso against the U.S. dollar.

Management’s Financial Review

As discussed in Item 3. “Key Information – Performance Indicators”, we use our Adjusted EBITDA and core income to assess our operating performance; a reconciliation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and our consolidated core income to our consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is set forth below.

The following table shows the reconciliation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to our consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

     December 31,  
     2016      2015      2014  
     (in million pesos)  

Adjusted EBITDA

   Php 61,161      Php 70,218      Php 76,750  

Add (deduct) adjustments:

        

Equity share in net earnings of associates and joint ventures

     1,181        3,241        3,841  

Interest income

     1,046        799        752  

Gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments – net

     996        420        (101

Amortization of intangible assets

     (929      (1,076      (1,149

Asset impairment

     (1,074      (5,788      (3,844

Provision for income tax

     (1,909      (4,563      (10,058

Foreign exchange losses – net

     (2,785      (3,036      (382

Impairment of investments

     (5,515      (5,166      —    

Financing costs – net

     (7,354      (6,259      (5,320

Depreciation and amortization

     (34,455      (31,519      (31,379

Other income – net

     9,799        4,804        4,980  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total adjustments

     (40,999      (48,143      (42,660
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Php 20,162      Php 22,075      Php 34,090  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

42


Table of Contents

The following table shows the reconciliation of our consolidated core income to our consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

     December 31,  
     2016      2015      2014(1)  
     (in million pesos)  

Consolidated core income

   Php 27,857      Php 35,212      Php 37,410  

Add (deduct) adjustments:

        

Gains on derivative financial instruments – net, excluding hedge costs

     1,539        762        208  

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     156        10        (1

Net tax effect of aforementioned adjustments

     79        260        778  

Core income adjustment on equity share in net losses of associates and joint ventures

     (95      (179      (79

Asset impairment

     (1,074      (5,788      (3,844

Foreign exchange losses – net

     (2,785      (3,036      (382

Impairment of investments

     (5,515      (5,166      —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total adjustments

     (7,695      (13,137      (3,320
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Php 20,162      Php 22,075      Php 34,090  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table shows the reconciliation of our consolidated basic and diluted core earnings per shares, or EPS, to our consolidated basic and diluted EPS attributable to common equity holders of PLDT for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

     2016     2015     2014  
     Basic     Diluted     Basic     Diluted     Diluted     Diluted  

Consolidated core EPS

   Php 128.68     Php 128.68     Php 162.70     Php 162.70     Php 172.88     Php 172.88  

Add (deduct) adjustments:

            

Gains on derivative financial instruments – net, excluding hedge costs

     4.98       4.98       2.47       2.47       0.55       0.55  

Core income adjustment on equity share in net losses of associates and joint ventures

     (0.45     (0.45     (0.83     (0.83     (0.37     (0.37

Foreign exchange losses – net

     (10.40     (10.40     (11.85     (11.85     (1.40     (1.40

Asset impairment

     (30.48     (30.48     (50.64     (50.64     (14.15     (14.15
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

     (36.35     (36.35     (60.85     (60.85     (15.37     (15.37
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EPS from continuing operations attributable to common equity holders of PLDT

     92.33       92.33       101.85       101.85       157.51       157.51  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated EPS attributable to common equity holders of PLDT

   Php 92.33     Php 92.33     Php 101.85     Php 101.85     Php 157.51     Php 157.51  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the end of each reporting period. The uncertainties inherent in these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the assets or liabilities affected in the future years.

Judgments

In the process of applying the PLDT Group’s accounting policies, management has made the following judgments, apart from those including estimations and assumptions, which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in our consolidated financial statements.

 

43


Table of Contents

Determination of functional currency

The functional currencies of the entities under the PLDT Group are the currency of the primary economic environment in which each entity operates. It is the currency that mainly influences the revenue from and cost of rendering products and services.

The presentation currency of the PLDT Group is the Philippine peso. Based on the economic substance of the underlying circumstances relevant to the PLDT Group, the functional currency of all entities under PLDT Group is the Philippine peso, except for (a) SMHC, FECL Group, PLDT Global and certain of its subsidiaries, DCPL, PGNL and certain of its subsidiaries, Chikka and certain of its subsidiaries and PGIC, which use the U.S. dollar; (b) eInnovations, Takatack Holdings, Takatack Technologies, iCommerce, Fintech Ventures, ePay, 3rd Brand, CPL and AGSPL, which use the Singapore dollar; (c) CCCBL, which uses the Chinese renminbi; (d) AGS Malaysia and Takatack Malaysia, which uses the Malaysian ringgit; and (e) AGS Indonesia, which uses the Indonesian rupiah.

Leases

As a lessee, we have various lease agreements in respect of certain equipment and properties. We evaluate whether significant risks and rewards of ownership of the leased properties are transferred to us (finance lease) or retained by the lessor (operating lease) based on IAS 17, Leases. Total lease expense amounted to Php6,912 million, Php6,376 million and Php6,692 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Total finance lease obligations amounted to nil and Php1 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 21 – Interest-bearing Financial Liabilities – Obligations under Finance Leases and Note 28 – Financial Assets and Liabilities – Liquidity Risk to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Accounting for investments in MediaQuest Holdings, Inc., or MediaQuest, through Philippine Depositary Receipts, or PDRs

ePLDT made various investments in PDRs issued by MediaQuest in relation to its direct interest in Satventures, Inc., or Satventures, and Hastings Holdings, Inc., or Hastings, and indirect interest in Cignal TV, Inc., or Cignal TV.

A summary of the PDRs issued by MediaQuest to ePLDT is set forth in the table below:

 

PDRs

   Date of issuance    Number of PDRs
issued
     Investment
cost
     Direct Economic
interest
   

Effective economic

interest

Cignal TV PDRs

   September 27, 2013      416,667      Php 6 billion        40   64%, which includes an indirect 24% interest through Satventures (reflecting Satventures’ 60% interest in Cignal TV multiplied by 40%)

Satventures PDRs

   September 27, 2013      333,333      Php  3.6 billion        40   40%

Hastings PDRs

   May 30, 2015      91,000      Php 3.25 billion        70   70%

Based on our judgment, at the PLDT Group level, ePLDT’s investments in PDRs gives ePLDT a significant influence over Satventures, Hastings and Cignal TV as evidenced by provision of essential technical information and material transactions among PLDT, Smart, Satventures, Hastings and Cignal TV, and thus are accounted for as investments in associates using the equity method.

The carrying value of our investments in PDRs issued by MediaQuest amounted to Php12,647 million and Php12,749 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See related discussion on Note 10 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Associates – Investment in MediaQuest PDRs to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Accounting for investments in Phunware and AppCard

In 2015, PLDT Capital subscribed to preferred shares of Phunware and AppCard. See Note 10 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”. The investments in Phunware and AppCard allow PLDT Capital to designate one director to the five-seat board of each of Phunware and AppCard for as long as PLDT Capital beneficially owns a specified percentage of Phunware or AppCard shares, as applicable.

Based on our judgment, at the PLDT Group Level, PLDT Capital’s investments in preferred shares give PLDT a significant influence over Phunware and AppCard as evidenced by the board seats assigned to us. This gives us the authority to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of Phunware and AppCard but neither control nor joint control of those policies. Hence, the investments are accounted for as investment in associates.

 

44


Table of Contents

Accounting for investments in VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare

On May 30, 2016, PLDT acquired a 50% equity interest in each of VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare. See related discussion on Note 10 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investments in Joint Ventures to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”. PLDT and Globe each have the right to appoint half the members of the Board of Directors of each of VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare, as well as the (i) co-Chairman of the Board; (ii) co-Chief Executive Officer and President; and (iii) co-Controller where any matter requiring their approval shall be deemed passed or approved if the consents of both co-officers holding the same position are obtained. All decisions of each such Board of Directors may only be approved if at least one director nominated by each of PLDT and Globe votes in favor of it.

Based on these rights, PLDT and Globe have joint control over VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare, which is defined in IFRS 11 as a contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement and exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Further, PLDT and Globe classified the joint arrangement as a joint venture in accordance with IFRS 11 given that PLDT and Globe each have the right to 50% of the net assets of VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare and their respective subsidiaries.

Accordingly, PLDT accounted for the investment in VTI, Bow Arken and Brightshare using the equity method of accounting in accordance with IAS 28, Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is initially recognized at cost and adjusted thereafter for the post-acquisition change in the investor’s share of the investee’s net assets.

Impairment of available-for-sale equity investments

For available-for-sale financial investments, we assess at each reporting date whether there is objective evidence that an investment or a group of investments is impaired.

In the case of equity investments classified as available-for-sale financial investments, objective evidence would include a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the investment below its cost. The determination of what is “significant” or “prolonged” requires judgment. We treat “significant” generally as decline of 20% or more below the original cost of investment, and “prolonged” as greater than 12 months assessed against the period in which the fair value has been below its original cost.

Based on our judgment, the decline in fair value of our investment in Rocket to Php14,587 million as at December 31, 2015 is considered significant as the cumulative net losses from changes in fair value amounting to Php5,124 million represents 26% decline in value below cost. As a result, we recognized in our consolidated income statement an impairment of our investment in Rocket amounting to Php5,124 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. We recognized additional impairment loss of Php5,381 million as the fair value of Rocket further declined to Php9,206 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. We recognized an unrealized gain of Php852 million in the “Net gains (losses) on available-for-sale financial investments” account in our consolidated other comprehensive income for the six months ended December 31, 2016 due to slight recovery of Rocket’s fair value to Php10,058 million as at December 31, 2016. See related discussion on Note 5 – Income and Expenses and Note 11 – Available-for-Sale Financial Investments – Investment of PLDT Online in Rocket to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Estimates and Assumptions

The key estimates and assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognized in our consolidated financial statements within the next financial year are discussed below. We based our estimates and assumptions on parameters available when the consolidated financial statements were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising beyond our control. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.

Impairment of non-financial assets

IFRS requires that an impairment review be performed when certain impairment indicators are present. In the case of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful life, at a minimum, such assets are subject to an impairment test annually and whenever there is an indication that such assets may be impaired. This requires an estimation of the value in use of the cash-generating units, or CGUs, to which these assets are allocated. The value in use calculation requires us to make an estimate of the expected future cash flows from the CGU and to choose a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value of those cash flows. See Note 15 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Impairment Testing of Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Indefinite Useful Life to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”for the key assumptions used to determine the value in use of the relevant CGUs.

Determining the recoverable amount of property and equipment, investments in associates and joint ventures, intangible assets, prepayments and other noncurrent assets, requires us to make estimates and assumptions in the determination of future cash flows expected to be generated from the continued use and ultimate disposition of such assets. Future events could cause us to conclude that property and equipment, investments in associates and joint ventures, intangible assets and other noncurrent assets associated with an acquired business are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and financial performance.

 

45


Table of Contents

The preparation of estimated future cash flows involves significant estimations and assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate and reasonable, significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our assessment of recoverable values and may lead to future impairment charges under IFRS.

Total asset impairment on noncurrent assets amounted to Php1,074 million, Php5,788 million and Php3,844 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information, Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Asset Impairment and Note 9 – Property and Equipment – Impairment of Certain Wireless Network Equipment and Facilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

The carrying values of our property and equipment, investments in associates, joint ventures and deposits, goodwill and intangible assets, and prepayments are separately disclosed in Notes 9, 10, 15 and 19, respectively.

Estimating useful lives of property and equipment

We estimate the useful lives of each item of our property and equipment based on the periods over which our assets are expected to be available for use. Our estimate of the useful lives of our property and equipment is based on our collective assessment of industry practice, internal technical evaluation and experience with similar assets. The estimated useful lives of our property and equipment are reviewed every year-end and are updated if expectations differ from previous estimates due to physical wear and tear, technical or commercial obsolescence and legal or other limitations on the use of our assets. It is possible, however, that future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in our estimates brought about by changes in the factors mentioned above. The amounts and timing of recorded expenses for any period would be affected by changes in these factors and circumstances. A reduction in the estimated useful lives of our property and equipment would increase our recorded depreciation and amortization and decrease our property and equipment.

The total depreciation and amortization of property and equipment amounted to Php34,455 million, Php31,519 million and Php31,379 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Total carrying values of property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, amounted to Php203,188 million and Php195,782 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 4 – Operating Segment Information and Note 9 – Property and Equipment to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Estimating useful lives of intangible assets with finite lives

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their expected useful lives using the straight-line method of amortization. At a minimum, the amortization period and the amortization method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at each financial year-end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are accounted for by changing the amortization period or method, as appropriate, and treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortization expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognized in our consolidated income statement.

The total amortization of intangible assets with finite lives amounted to Php929 million, Php1,076 million and Php1,149 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Total carrying values of intangible assets with finite lives amounted to Php4,396 million and Php5,219 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 4 – Operating Segment Information and Note 15 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Business combinations

Our consolidated financial statements and financial performance reflect acquired businesses after the completion of the respective acquisition. We account for the acquired businesses using the acquisition method, which requires extensive use of accounting judgments and estimates to allocate the purchase price to the fair market values of the acquiree’s identifiable assets and liabilities and contingent liabilities, if any, at the acquisition date. Any excess in the purchase price over the estimated fair market values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill in our consolidated statement of financial position. Thus, the numerous judgments made in estimating the fair market value to be assigned to the acquiree’s assets and liabilities can materially affect our financial performance and position. See Note 14 – Business Combination to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Recognition of deferred income tax assets

We review the carrying amounts of deferred income tax assets at the end of each reporting period and reduce these to the extent that these are no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax assets to be utilized. Our assessment on the recognition of deferred income tax assets on deductible temporary differences is based on the level and timing of forecasted taxable income of the subsequent reporting periods. This forecast is based on our past results and future expectations on revenues and expenses as well as future tax planning strategies. Based on this, management expects that we will generate sufficient taxable income to allow all or part of our deferred income tax assets to be utilized.

 

46


Table of Contents

Based on the above assessment, our consolidated unrecognized deferred income tax assets amounted to Php5,829 million and Php10,759 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Total consolidated benefit from deferred income tax amounted to Php4,134 million, Php4,710 million and Php1,024 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Total consolidated recognized deferred income tax assets amounted to Php27,348 million and Php21,941 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 4 – Operating Segment Information and Note 7 – Income Taxes to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Estimating allowance for doubtful accounts

If we assessed that there was objective evidence that an impairment loss was incurred in our trade and other receivables, we estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts related to our trade and other receivables that are specifically identified as doubtful of collection. The amount of allowance is evaluated by management on the basis of factors that affect the collectability of the accounts. In these cases, we use judgment based on all available facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, the length of our relationship with the customer and the customer’s credit status based on third party credit reports and known market factors, to record specific reserves for customers against amounts due in order to reduce our receivables to amounts that we expect to collect. These specific reserves are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional information received affects the amounts estimated.

In addition to specific allowance against individually significant receivables, we also assess a collective impairment allowance against credit exposures of our customer which were grouped based on common credit characteristics, which, although not specifically identified as requiring a specific allowance, have a greater risk of default than when the receivables were originally granted to customers. This collective allowance is based on historical loss experience using various factors, such as historical performance of the customers within the collective group, deterioration in the markets in which the customers operate, and identified structural weaknesses or deterioration in the cash flows of customers.

Total provision for doubtful accounts for trade and other receivables recognized in our consolidated income statements amounted to Php8,027 million, Php3,391 million and Php2,023 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Trade and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, amounted to Php24,436 million and Php24,898 million as at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. See Note 4 – Operating Segment Information, Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Asset Impairment, Note 17 – Trade and Other Receivables and Note 28 – Financial Assets and Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Estimating pension benefit costs and other employee benefits

The cost of defined benefit and present value of the pension obligation are determined using the projected unit credit method. An actuarial valuation includes making various assumptions which consists, among other things, discount rates, rates of compensation increases and mortality rates. Further, our accrued benefit cost is affected by the fair value of the plan assets. Key assumptions used to estimate fair value of the unlisted equity investments included in the plan assets consist of revenue growth, operating margin, capital expenditures, discount rates and terminal growth rates. See Note 26 – Employee Benefits to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”. Due to complexity of valuation, the underlying assumptions and its long-term nature, a defined benefit obligation is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable and appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our cost for pension and other retirement obligations. All assumptions are reviewed every year-end.

Net consolidated pension benefit costs amounted to Php1,775 million, Php1,895 million and Php1,702 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The prepaid benefit costs amounted to Php261 million and Php306 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The accrued benefit costs amounted to Php11,206 million and Php10,197 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 5 – Income and Expenses – Compensation and Employee Benefits, Note 19 – Prepayments and Note 26 – Employee Benefits – Defined Benefit Pension Plans to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Provision for asset retirement obligations

Provision for asset retirement obligations are recognized in the period in which these are incurred if a reasonable estimate can be made. This requires an estimation of the cost to restore/dismantle on a per square meter basis, depending on the location, and is based on the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the future restoration/dismantlement date, discounted using a pre-tax rate that reflects the current market assessment of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risk specific to the liability. Total provision for asset retirement obligations amounted to Php1,582 million and Php1,437 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 22 – Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

Provision for legal contingencies and tax assessments

We are currently involved in various legal proceedings and tax assessments. Our estimates of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims have been developed in consultation with our counsel handling the defense in these matters and are based upon our analysis of potential results. We currently do not believe these proceedings could materially reduce our revenues and profitability. It is possible, however, that future financial position and performance could be materially affected by changes in our estimates or effectiveness of our strategies relating to these proceedings and assessments. See Note 27 – Provisions and Contingencies to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

 

47


Table of Contents

Based on management’s assessment, appropriate provisions were made; however, management has decided not to disclose further details of these provisions as they may prejudice our position in certain legal proceedings.

Revenue recognition

Our revenue recognition policies require us to make use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of our revenues and receivables.

Our agreements with domestic and foreign carriers for inbound and outbound traffic subject to settlements require traffic reconciliations before actual settlement is done, which may not be the actual volume of traffic as measured by us. Initial recognition of revenues is based on our observed traffic adjusted by our normal experience adjustments, which historically are not material to our consolidated financial statements. Differences between the amounts initially recognized and the actual settlements are taken up in the accounts upon reconciliation.

Revenues earned from multiple element arrangements offered by our fixed line and wireless businesses are split into separately identifiable components based on their relative fair value in order to reflect the substance of the transaction. Where fair value is not directly observable, the total consideration is allocated using an appropriate allocation method. We account for mobile contracts in accordance with IAS 18, Revenue Recognition, and have concluded that the handset and the mobile services may be accounted for as separate identifiable components. The handset (with activation) is delivered first, followed by the mobile service (which is provided over the contract/lock-in period, generally one or two years). Because some amount of the arrangement consideration that may be allocated to the handset generally is contingent on providing the mobile service, the amount that is allocated to the handset is limited to the cash received (i.e., the amount paid for the handset) at the time of the handset delivery.

Under certain arrangements with our knowledge processing solutions services, if there is uncertainty regarding the outcome of the transaction for which service was rendered, revenue is recognized only to the extent of expenses incurred for rendering the service and only to such amount as determined to be recoverable.

We recognize our revenues from installation and activation related fees and the corresponding costs over the expected average periods of customer relationship for fixed line and cellular services. We estimate the expected average period of customer relationship based on our most recent churn rate analysis.

Determination of fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities

Where the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in our consolidated statement of financial position cannot be derived from active markets, they are determined using valuation techniques including the discounted cash flows model. The inputs to these models are taken from observable markets where possible, but where this is not feasible, a degree of judgment is required in establishing fair values. The judgments include considerations of inputs such as liquidity risk, credit risk and volatility. Changes in assumptions about these factors could affect the reported fair value of financial instruments.

Other than those whose carrying amounts are reasonable approximations of fair values, total fair values of noncurrent financial assets and noncurrent financial liabilities as at December 31, 2016 amounted to Php8,120 million and Php160,990 million, respectively, while the total fair values of noncurrent financial assets and noncurrent financial liabilities as at December 31, 2015 amounted to Php3,277 million and Php165,572 million, respectively. See Note 28 – Financial Assets and Liabilities to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements”.

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations to Existing Standards Effective Subsequent to December 31, 2016

See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. “Financial Statements” for the discussion of new accounting standards that will become effective subsequent to December 31, 2016 and their anticipated impact on our consolidated financial statements for the current and future periods.

Results of Operations

The table below shows the contribution by each of our business segments to our consolidated revenues, expenses, other income (expense), income (loss) before income tax, net income (loss), Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin and core income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. In each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, a majority of our revenues are derived from our operations within the Philippines. Our revenues derived from outside the Philippines consist primarily of revenues from incoming international calls to the Philippines.

In 2016, we changed the classification of our revenue mix to provide for a more direct comparison to the current industry presentation in the Philippines by combining or separating certain line items from our service lines, and moving line items from one service line to another. Additionally, we reclassified our impairment on investments not directly affecting operations (most significantly, the impairment of our investment in Rocket), from operating expenses to other expenses. Accordingly, we reclassified prior years’ financial information to conform with the current year’s presentation in order to provide a clear comparison.

 

48


Table of Contents
     Wireless     Fixed Line     Others     Inter-segment
Transactions
    Consolidated  
           (in millions)        

For the year ended December 31, 2016

          

Revenues

     Php104,914       Php72,728       Php20       (Php12,400     Php165,262  

Expenses

     93,204       61,285       42       (13,972     140,559  

Other income (expenses)

     (3,517     (291     2,748       (1,572     (2,632

Income before income tax

     8,193       11,152       2,726       —         22,071  

Provision for (Benefit from) income tax

     (1,270     3,018       161       —         1,909  

Net income/Segment profit

     9,463       8,134       2,565       —         20,162  

Adjusted EBITDA

     32,661       26,950       (22     1,572       61,161  

Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)

     32     39     —         —         39

Core income

     11,402       7,746       8,709       —         27,857  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015

          

Revenues

     115,513       68,865       —         (13,275     171,103  

Expenses

     95,358       58,417       59       (14,566     139,268  

Other income (expenses)

     (1,958     (2,599     651       (1,291     (5,197

Income before income tax

     18,197       7,849       592       —         26,638  

Provision for income tax

     2,763       1,656       144       —         4,563  

Net income/Segment profit

     15,434       6,193       448       —         22,075  

Adjusted EBITDA

     44,237       24,749       (59     1,291       70,218  

Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)

     40     38     —         —         43

Core income

     22,512       6,539       6,161       —         35,212  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

          

Revenues

     118,879       66,178       —         (14,222     170,835  

Expenses

     89,102       56,855       56       (15,556     130,457  

Other income (expenses)

     (724     217       5,611       (1,334     3,770  

Income before income tax

     29,053       9,540       5,555       —         44,148  

Provision for income tax

     7,158       2,818       82       —         10,058  

Net income/Segment profit

     21,895       6,722       5,473       —         34,090  

Adjusted EBITDA

     50,917       24,555       (56     1,334       76,750  

Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)

     44     38     —         —         47

Core income

     25,176       6,691       5,543       —         37,410  

 

(1) 

Adjusted EBITDA margin for the year is measured as Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations divided by service revenues.

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

On a Consolidated Basis

Revenues

We reported consolidated revenues of Php165,262 million in 2016, a decrease of Php5,841 million, or 3%, as compared with Php171,103 million in 2015, primarily due to lower revenues from mobile, and digital platforms and mobile financial services from our wireless business, and lower revenues from fixed line voice services, partially offset by higher corporate data and leased lines, miscellaneous and non-service revenues from our fixed line business, as well as higher home broadband revenues.

 

49


Table of Contents

The following table shows the breakdown of our consolidated revenues by services for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

     Wireless      Fixed Line      Others      Inter-segment
Transactions
    Consolidated  
            (in millions)        

For the year ended December 31, 2016

             

Service Revenues

             

Wireless

   Php 100,582            (Php 1,467   Php 99,115  

Mobile

     96,497              (1,431     95,066  

Home Broadband

     2,772              (14     2,758  

Digital platforms and mobile financial services

     728              (19     709  

MVNO and others

     585              (3     582  

Fixed Line

      Php 69,006           (10,920     58,086  

Voice

        29,630           (4,128     25,502  

Data

        37,711           (5,984     31,727  

Home broadband

        14,896           (167     14,729  

Corporate data and leased lines

        19,980           (5,025     14,955  

Data Center and IT

        2,835           (792     2,043  

Miscellaneous

        1,665           (808     857  

Others

         Php 20        (11     9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Service Revenues

     100,582        69,006        20        (12,398     157,210  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-Service Revenues

             

Sale of computers, mobile handsets and SIM-packs

     4,332        2,909        —          (2     7,239  

Point-product sales

     —          813        —          —         813  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Non-Service Revenues

     4,332        3,722        —          (2     8,052  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Revenues

     104,914        72,728        20        (12,400     165,262  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015

             

Service Revenues

             

Wireless

     110,716              (1,528     109,188  

Mobile

     105,655              (1,480     104,175  

Home Broadband

     3,040              (24     3,016  

Digital platforms and mobile financial services

     1,051              (3     1,048  

MVNO and others

     970              (21     949  

Fixed Line

        65,475           (11,733     53,742  

Voice

        30,253           (4,454     25,799  

Data

        33,748           (6,578     27,170  

Home broadband

        12,338           (10     12,328  

Corporate data and leased lines

        18,806           (5,863     12,943  

Data Center and IT

        2,604           (705     1,899  

Miscellaneous

        1,474           (701     773  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Service Revenues

     110,716        65,475        —          (13,261     162,930  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-Service Revenues

             

Sale of computers, mobile handsets and SIM-packs

     4,797        2,692        —          (2     7,487  

Point-product sales

     —          698        —          (12     686  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Non-Service Revenues

     4,797        3,390        —          (14     8,173  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Revenues

   Php 115,513      Php 68,865        Php—        (Php 13,275   Php 171,103  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table shows the breakdown of our consolidated revenues by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

                             Change  
     2016     %     2015     %     Amount     %  
     (in millions)  

Wireless

     Php104,914       64       Php115,513       68       (Php10,599)       (9

Fixed line

     72,728       44       68,865       40       3,863       6  

Others

     20       —         —         —         20       100  

Inter-segment transactions

     (12,400     (8     (13,275     (8     875       (7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated

     Php165,262       100       Php171,103       100       (Php5,841)       (3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expenses

Consolidated expenses increased by Php1,291 million, or 1%, to Php140,559 million in 2016 from Php139,268 million in 2015, as a result of higher expenses related to depreciation and amortization, asset impairment, cost of sales, and operating expenses related to professional and other contracted services, rent, and repairs and maintenance, partially offset by lower expenses related to selling and promotions, compensation and employee benefits, taxes and licenses, communication, training and travel, and other operating expenses, as well as lower interconnection costs.

 

50


Table of Contents

The following table shows the breakdown of our consolidated expenses by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

                            Change  
     2016     %     2015    %     Amount     %  
     (in millions)  

Wireless

   Php 93,204       66     Php 95,358      68     (Php 2,154     (2

Fixed line

     61,285       44     58,417      42       2,868       5  

Others

     42       —       59      —         (17     (29

Inter-segment transactions

     (13,972     (10   (14,566)      (10     594       (4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated

   Php 140,559       100     Php139,268      100     Php 1,291       1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Expenses

Consolidated other expenses amounted to Php2,632 million in 2016, a decrease of Php2,565 million, or 49%, from Php5,197 million in 2015, primarily due to the combined effects of the following: (i) other income of Php4,284 million in 2016 as against other expenses of Php362 million in 2015 due to higher gain on sale of Beacon shares by PCEV in 2016 compared to gain on sale of Beacon’s Meralco shares in 2015 and a higher gain on sale of property, partly offset by higher impairment resulting from the fair value decline of our investment in Rocket; (ii) higher net gain on derivative financial instruments by Php576 million on account of mark-to-market gains on foreign exchange derivatives due to the higher level of depreciation of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar, partly offset by narrower dollar and peso interest rate differentials in 2016; (iii) lower foreign exchange losses by Php251 million due to lower net foreign currency-denominated liabilities, partly offset by higher level of depreciation of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar to Php49.77 as at December 31, 2016 from Php47.12 as at December 31, 2015 and Php44.74 as at December 31, 2014; (iv) higher interest income by Php247 million due to an increase in principal amount of temporary cash investments and the higher weighted average rate of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar in 2016, partly offset by lower weighted average interest rates; (v) higher net financing costs by Php1,095 million due to higher outstanding loan balance, higher weighted average interest rate, higher financing charges and higher weighted average rate of the Philippine peso relative to the U.S. dollar in 2016, partly offset by higher capitalized interest; and (vi) a decrease in equity share in net earnings of associates by Php2,060 million due to lower share in net earnings of Beacon, equity share in the net losses of VTI, Philippines Internet Holding S.à.r.l., or PHIH, and ECommerce Pay, and higher share in net losses of Cignal TV and AF Payments, Inc., or AFPI, for the year ended December 31, 2016, partly offset by higher share in net earnings of Beta due to the sale of its SPi CRM business, and Hastings.

The following table shows the breakdown of our consolidated other income (expenses) by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

                   Change  
     2016      2015      Amount      %  
     (in millions)  

Wireless

   (Php 3,517    (Php 1,958    (Php 1,559      80  

Fixed line

     (291      (2,599      2,308        (89

Others

     2,748        651        2,097        322  

Inter-segment transactions

     (1,572      (1,291      (281      22  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated

   (Php 2,632    (Php 5,197    Php 2,565        (49
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Income

Consolidated net income decreased by Php1,913 million, or 9%, to Php20,162 million in 2016, from Php22,075 million in 2015. The decrease was mainly due to the combined effects of the following: (i) lower consolidated revenues by Php5,841 million; (ii) higher consolidated expenses by Php1,291 million; (iii) a decrease in consolidated other expenses – net by Php2,565 million; and (iv) a decrease in consolidated provision for income tax by Php2,654 million. Our consolidated basic and diluted EPS decreased to Php92.33 in 2016 from consolidated basic and diluted EPS of Php101.85 in 2015. Our weighted average number of outstanding common shares was approximately 216.06 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

The following table shows the breakdown of our consolidated net income by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

                                 Change  
     2016      %      2015      %      Amount     %  
     (in millions)  

Wireless

   Php 9,463        47      Php 15,434        70      (Php 5,971     (39

Fixed line

     8,134        40        6,193        28        1,941       31  

Others

     2,565        13        448        2        2,117       473  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated

   Php 20,162        100      Php 22,075        100      (Php 1,913     (9
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

Our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA amounted to Php61,161 million in 2016, a decrease of Php9,057 million, or 13%, as compared with Php70,218 million in 2015, primarily due to lower consolidated revenues, higher provisions for doubtful accounts and inventory obsolescence, as well as an increase in cost of sales, partially offset by lower consolidated cash operating expenses mainly driven by selling and promotions, compensation and employee benefits, taxes and licenses, and interconnection costs.

 

51


Table of Contents

The following table shows the breakdown of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

                               Change  
     2016     %      2015     %      Amount     %  
     (in millions)  

Wireless

   Php 32,661       53      Php 44,237       63      (Php 11,576     (26

Fixed line

     26,950       44        24,749       35        2,201       9  

Others

     (22     —          (59     —          37       (63

Inter-segment transactions

     1,572       3        1,291       2        281       22  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated

   Php 61,161       100      Php 70,218       100      (Php 9,057     (13
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Core Income

Our consolidated core income amounted to Php27,857 million in 2016, a decrease of Php7,355 million, or 21%, as compared with Php35,212 million in 2015 primarily due to lower consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and higher depreciation, partially offset by a decrease in other expenses and lower provision for income tax. Our consolidated basic and diluted core EPS, decreased to Php128.68 in 2016 from Php162.70 in 2015.

The following table shows the breakdown of our consolidated core income by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: