XML 70 R53.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Other (Income)/Deductions - Net - Intangible Assets (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Millions
3 Months Ended 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Oct. 01, 2017
Sep. 30, 2018
Oct. 01, 2017
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]        
Impairment [1] $ (1) $ 130 $ 40 $ 143
Developed Technology Right [Member]        
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]        
Intangible assets at fair value [2],[3] 35   35  
Impairment [2]     31  
Level 1 [Member] | Developed Technology Right [Member]        
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]        
Intangible assets at fair value [2],[3] 0   0  
Level 2 [Member] | Developed Technology Right [Member]        
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]        
Intangible assets at fair value [2],[3] 0   0  
Level 3 [Member] | Developed Technology Right [Member]        
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]        
Intangible assets at fair value [2],[3] $ 35   $ 35  
[1] In the first nine months of 2018, primarily includes a $31 million intangible asset impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 2018 related to an IH finite-lived developed technology right, acquired in connection with our acquisition of Anacor, for the treatment for toenail fungus marketed in the U.S. market only. The impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 2018 related to IH reflects, among other things, updated commercial forecasts. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, primarily includes an intangible asset impairment charge of $127 million related to developed technology rights, acquired in connection with our acquisition of Hospira, for a generic sterile injectable product for the treatment of edema associated with certain conditions. The intangible asset impairment charge for the third quarter and first nine months of 2017 is associated with EH and reflects, among other things, updated commercial forecasts and an increased competitive environment.
[2] Reflects an intangible asset written down to fair value in the first nine months of 2018. Fair value was determined using the income approach, specifically the multi-period excess earnings method, also known as the discounted cash flow method. We started with a forecast of all the expected net cash flows associated with the asset and then applied an asset-specific discount rate to arrive at a net present value amount. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in this approach include: the amount and timing of the projected net cash flows, which includes the expected impact of competitive, legal and/or regulatory forces on the product; the discount rate, which seeks to reflect the various risks inherent in the projected cash flows; and the tax rate, which seeks to incorporate the geographic diversity of the projected cash flows.
[3] The fair value amount is presented as of the date of impairment, as these assets are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.