10-Q 1 l94447ae10-q.htm RES-CARE, INC. 10-Q/QUARTER ENDED 3-31-2002 Res-Care, Inc. 10-Q/Quarter Ended 3-31-2002
Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

     
(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002
 
    or
 
[   ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission File Number: 0-20372


RES-CARE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     
KENTUCKY   61-0875371
(State or other jurisdiction of   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    
     
10140 Linn Station Road   40223-3813
Louisville, Kentucky   (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)    

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (502) 394-2100

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes    X   No        .

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, no par value, as of April 30, 2002, was 24,414,686.



 


INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Unaudited Financial Statements
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
Exhibit 10.1-Employment Agreement Dated 2-6-2001
Exhibit 10.2-Employment Agreement


Table of Contents

INDEX

RES-CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

         
        PAGE
PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION   NUMBER
 
Item 1.   Unaudited Financial Statements    
 
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2002
     and December 31, 2001
    2
 
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income –
     Three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001
    3
 
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows –
     Three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001
    4
 
    Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements –
     March 31, 2002
    5
 
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
     Results of Operations
  10
 
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk   19
 
PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION    
 
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings   20
 
Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K   22
 
SIGNATURES        

1


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Unaudited Financial Statements

RES-CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

                     
        March 31   December 31
        2002   2001
       
 
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 58,844     $ 58,997  
 
Accounts and notes receivable, net
    139,268       132,181  
 
Refundable income taxes
          698  
 
Deferred income taxes
    22,583       22,583  
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    14,989       12,459  
 
   
     
 
   
Total current assets
    235,684       226,918  
 
   
     
 
Property and equipment, net
    59,171       58,779  
Excess of acquisition cost over net assets acquired, net
    213,208       209,413  
Other assets
    31,581       39,826  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 539,644     $ 534,936  
 
   
     
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
 
Trade accounts payable
  $ 23,708     $ 31,731  
 
Current portion of long-term debt
    2,199       1,697  
 
Accrued expenses
    60,716       50,613  
 
Accrued income taxes
    539        
 
   
     
 
   
Total current liabilities
    87,162       84,041  
 
   
     
 
Long-term liabilities
    7,133       7,481  
Long-term debt
    267,417       268,014  
Deferred income taxes
    1,271       1,271  
 
   
     
 
   
Total liabilities
    362,983       360,807  
 
   
     
 
Commitments and contingencies
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
 
Preferred shares
           
 
Common stock
    47,882       47,870  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    29,355       29,280  
 
Retained earnings
    99,424       96,979  
 
   
     
 
   
Total shareholders’ equity
    176,661       174,129  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 539,644     $ 534,936  
 
   
     
 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

RES-CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

                     
        Three Months Ended
        March 31
       
        2002   2001
       
 
Revenues
  $ 226,410     $ 219,723  
Facility and program expenses
    204,438       199,303  
 
   
     
 
Facility and program contribution
    21,972       20,420  
Operating expenses (income):
               
 
Corporate general and administrative
    8,924       7,615  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    3,173       5,417  
 
Special charges
          1,729  
 
Other (income) expense
    (74 )     5  
 
   
     
 
   
Total operating expenses
    12,023       14,766  
 
   
     
 
Operating income
    9,949       5,654  
Interest expense, net
    6,037       4,979  
 
   
     
 
Income before income taxes
    3,912       675  
Income tax expense
    1,467       311  
 
   
     
 
Net income
  $ 2,445     $ 364  
 
   
     
 
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01  
 
   
     
 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01  
 
   
     
 
Weighted average number of common shares:
               
 
Basic
    24,389       24,334  
 
Diluted
    24,731       24,384  

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

RES-CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

                     
        Three Months Ended
        March 31
       
        2002   2001
       
 
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ 3,014     $ (5,434 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
 
Purchases of property and equipment
    (2,839 )     (1,779 )
 
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
    (100 )      
 
Proceeds from sales of assets
    62        
 
   
     
 
   
Cash used in investing activities
    (2,877 )     (1,779 )
 
   
     
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
 
Net repayments under credit facility with banks
          (14,619 )
 
Repayments of long-term debt
    (377 )     (1,519 )
 
Proceeds received from exercise of stock options
    87       239  
 
   
     
 
   
Cash used in financing activities
    (290 )     (15,899 )
 
   
     
 
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (153 )   $ (23,112 )
 
   
     
 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

Res-Care, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2002
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. Basis of Presentation

     Res-Care, Inc. is primarily engaged in the delivery of residential, training, educational and support services to various populations with special needs, including persons with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities and at-risk and troubled youth. All references in these financial statements to “ResCare,” “we,” “us,” or “our” mean Res-Care, Inc. and unless the context otherwise requires, its consolidated subsidiaries.

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of ResCare have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods have been included. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002.

     For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

NOTE 2. Long-term Debt

     Long-term debt consists of the following:

                   
      March 31   December 31
      2002   2001
     
 
      (In thousands)
10.625% senior notes due 2008
  $ 150,000     $ 150,000  
6% convertible subordinated notes due 2004, net of unamortized discount of $1,109 and $1,213 in 2002 and 2001
    96,251       96,147  
5.9% convertible subordinated notes due 2005
    15,613       15,613  
Obligations under capital leases
    4,323       4,501  
Notes payable and other
    3,429       3,450  
 
   
     
 
 
    269,616       269,711  
 
Less current portion
    2,199       1,697  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 267,417     $ 268,014  
 
   
     
 

5


Table of Contents

     On March 22, 2002, we completed an amendment to our $80 million credit facility with a group of banks. The amendment takes into account certain fourth quarter 2001 charges in calculating the financial covenants and includes other changes in determining the borrowing base and the definition of eligible accounts receivable for that determination. Interest rates on borrowings under the facility and the standby letters of credit remain unchanged as a result of this amendment. As a result of the amendment, we are in compliance with our debt covenants as of March 31, 2002.

NOTE 3. Earnings Per Share

     The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

                   
      Three Months Ended
      March 31
     
      2002   2001
     
 
      (In thousands,
except per share data)
Income attributable to shareholders for basic and diluted earnings per share
  $ 2,445     $ 364  
 
   
     
 
Weighted average number of common shares used in basic earnings per share
    24,389       24,334  
Effect of dilutive securities:
               
 
Stock options
    342       50  
 
   
     
 
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares in diluted earnings per share
    24,731       24,384  
 
   
     
 
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01  
 
   
     
 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01  
 
   
     
 

     The average shares listed below were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented:

                 
    Three Months Ended
    March 31
   
    2002   2001
   
 
    (In thousands)
Convertible subordinated notes
    5,781       6,574  
Stock options
    1,895       1,670  

6


Table of Contents

NOTE 4. Segment Information

     The following table sets forth information about our reportable segments. During 2001, we disclosed information for two reportable operating segments, comprised of disabilities services and youth services. Effective January 1, 2002, in connection with changes in our management structure, the youth services division was split into two segments: (i) training services (consisting of the Job Corps operations) and (ii) youth services (consisting of all other youth services programs), which were brought under the direction of individual presidents. The information for prior periods presented has been restated to reflect this change.

                                         
    Disabilities   Training   Youth   All   Consolidated
    Services   Services   Services   Other   Totals
   
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended March 31:   (In thousands)
 
2002
                                       
Revenues
  $ 177,841     $ 35,075     $ 13,494     $     $ 226,410  
Segment profit(1)
    15,156       3,711       792       (9,710 )     9,949  
 
2001
                                       
Revenues
  $ 171,132     $ 33,466     $ 15,125     $     $ 219,723  
Segment profit(1)(2)
    10,052       3,520       550       (8,468 )     5,654  


(1)   All Other segment profit is comprised of corporate general and administrative expenses and corporate depreciation and amortization.
 
(2)   Disabilities services segment profit for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 includes a special charge of approximately $1.6 million related to the cessation of certain operations in Tennessee.

Note 5. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

     In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 141, Business Combinations, and Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Statement 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 as well as all purchase method business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. Statement 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of Statement 142. We adopted the provisions of Statement 141 upon its issuance in July 2001 and the provisions of Statement 142 effective January 1, 2002.

     As of January 1, 2002, we had unamortized goodwill in the amount of approximately $209 million, which will be subject to the transition provisions of Statements 141 and 142. We will test goodwill for impairment using the two-step process prescribed in Statement 142. The first step is a screen for potential impairment, while the second step measures the amount of the impairment, if any. We expect to perform the required impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as of January 1, 2002 in the second quarter of 2002. Any impairment charge resulting from these transitional impairment tests will be reflected as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the second quarter of 2002. We have not yet determined what the effect of these tests will be on our earnings and financial position.

7


Table of Contents

     A reconciliation of net income and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2001, as if we had ceased amortizing goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets according to Statement 142 effective January 1, 2001, follows:

                 
            Diluted
    Net   Earnings
    Income   per Share
   
 
(In thousands, except per share data)
               
As reported
  $ 364     $ 0.01  
Goodwill amortization, net of tax
    1,316       0.05  
 
   
     
 
As adjusted
  $ 1,680     $ 0.06  
 
   
     
 

     In October 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While Statement 144 supersedes Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of the previous Statement. Statement 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, it retains the requirements in Opinion No. 30 to report separately discontinued operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. We adopted Statement 144 effective January 1, 2002. The adoption of Statement 144 did not have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

NOTE 6. Contingencies

     In July 2000, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, or AISL, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. In the Complaint, AISL sought a declaration of what insurance coverage was available to ResCare in Cause No. 299291-401; In re: Estate of Trenia Wright, Deceased, et al. v. Res-Care, Inc., et al., which was filed in Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County, Texas (the Lawsuit). After the filing, we entered into an agreement with AISL whereby the claims in the Lawsuit were covered under the insurance policies issued by AISL. AISL thereafter settled the Lawsuit for $9 million. It is our position that the Lawsuit initiated coverage under policies of insurance in more than one policy year, thus affording adequate coverage to settle the Lawsuit within coverage and policy limits and that AISL waived any applicable exclusions for punitive damages. On November 23, 2001, a summary judgment was granted in favor of AISL, which was reduced to a final judgment on February 26, 2002. On March 8, 2002, we filed a motion for new trial and to alter judgment which is pending before the trial judge. In our opinion, after consulting with outside trial counsel and special counsel engaged to review the decision, substantial grounds exist for a successful appeal. We have not made any provision in our consolidated financial statements for any potential liability that may result from final adjudication of this matter. We do not believe it is probable that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

     In October 2000, ResCare and one of our subsidiaries, Res-Care Florida, Inc., f/k/a Normal Life Florida, Inc., entered into an agreement with AISL to resolve through binding arbitration a dispute as to the amount of coverage available to settle a lawsuit that had previously been filed in Pinellas County Circuit Court, Florida and subsequently settled after we entered into the agreement. AISL contends that a portion of the settlement reached was comprised of punitive damages and, therefore, not the responsibility

8


Table of Contents

of AISL. It is our position that the settlement was an amount that a reasonable and prudent insurer would pay for the actual damages alleged and that AISL had opportunities to settle all claims within available coverage limits. Binding arbitration was held on January 15 and 16, 2002, and on February 14, 2002, a decision was entered in our favor stating that the underlying settlement was within the coverage limits of our policy and also awarding us attorney fees and costs.

     On September 2, 2001, in a case styled Nellie Lake, Individually as an Heir-at-Law of Christina Zellner, deceased; and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christina Zellner v. Res-Care, Inc., et al., in the U.S. District Court of the District of Kansas at Wichita, a jury awarded noneconomic damages to Ms. Lake in the amount of $100,000, the statutory maximum, as well as $5,000 for economic loss. In addition, the jury awarded the Estate of Christina Zellner $5,000 of noneconomic damages and issued an advisory opinion recommending an award of $2.5 million in punitive damages. The judge, however, was not required to award the amount of punitive damages recommended by the jury and on February 4, 2002, entered a punitive damage judgment in the amount of $1 million. Based on the advice of counsel, we appealed the award of punitive damages, based on numerous appealable errors at trial. Based on the advice of counsel, we believe any damages resulting from this matter are covered by insurance and, accordingly, we have not made any provision in our consolidated financial statements for any potential liability that may result from final adjudication of this matter. We do not believe it is probable that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

     In September 1997, a lawsuit, styled Cause No. 98-00740, Nancy Chesser v. Normal Life of Texas, Inc., and Normal Life, Inc. District Court of Travis County, Texas was filed against a Texas facility operated by the former owners of Normal Life, Inc. and Normal Life of North Texas, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, asserting causes of action for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and retaliation regarding the discharge of residents of the facility. In May 2000, a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff awarding the plaintiff damages, prejudgment interest and attorneys’ fees totaling $4.8 million. In October 2000, ResCare and AISL entered into an agreement whereby any settlement reached in Chesser and a related lawsuit also filed in the District Court of Travis County, Texas would not be dispositive of whether the claims in those suits were covered under the policies issued by AISL. AISL thereafter settled the suits and filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Normal Life of North Texas, Inc. and Normal Life, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. In the Complaint, AISL seeks a declaration of what insurance coverage is available to ResCare in the lawsuits. It is our position that the lawsuits initiated coverage under the primary policies of insurance, thus affording adequate coverage to settle the lawsuits within coverage and policy limits. The trial of this declaratory judgment action previously scheduled for trial in March 2002 has been postponed with no new trial date set. We do not believe it is probable that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

     In addition, we are a party to various other legal and/or administrative proceedings arising out of the operation of our facilities and programs and arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, generally, these claims are without merit. Further, many of such claims may be covered by insurance. We do not believe the results of these proceedings or claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

9


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations

Overview

     Res-Care, Inc. receives revenues primarily from the delivery of residential, training, educational and support services to populations with special needs. All references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “ResCare,” “we,” “our,” or “us” mean Res-Care, Inc. and, unless the context otherwise requires, its consolidated subsidiaries. We have three reportable operating segments: (i) disabilities services, (ii) youth services and (iii) training services. Further information regarding each of these segments, including the disclosure of required segment financial information, is included in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Effective in the first quarter of 2002, with a restructuring within the youth services division and the appointment of a separate president for the Job Corps unit and one for the other youth services business unit, we split the youth services reporting segment into two segments: (i) training services (consisting of Job Corps operations) and (ii) youth services (consisting of other youth services operations). Accordingly, beginning in 2002, we have three reportable segments.

Significant Developments in 2002

     On March 22, 2002, we completed an amendment to our credit facility with a group of banks. The amendment takes into account certain fourth quarter 2001 charges in calculating the financial covenants and includes other changes in determining the borrowing base and the definition of eligible accounts receivable for that determination. Interest rates on borrowings under the facility and the standby letters of credit remain unchanged as a result of this amendment. As a result of the amendment, we are in compliance with our debt covenants as of March 31, 2002.

10


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

                   
      Three Months Ended
      March 31
     
      2002   2001
     
 
      (In thousands)
Revenues
               
 
Disabilities Services
  $ 177,841     $ 171,132  
 
Training Services
    35,075       33,466  
 
Youth Services
    13,494       15,125  
 
   
     
 
 
Consolidated
  $ 226,410     $ 219,723  
 
   
     
 
Segment Profit as % of Revenue:
               
 
Disabilities Services
    8.5 %     5.9 %
 
Training Services
    10.6 %     10.5 %
 
Youth Services
    5.9 %     3.6 %
 
Labor Cost as % of Revenue:
               
 
Disabilities Services
    62.8 %     63.1 %
 
Training Services
    52.0 %     48.6 %
 
Youth Services
    57.5 %     58.8 %
 
Consolidated
    62.9 %     62.5 %
 
EBITDA(1):
               
 
Disabilities Services
  $ 17,223     $ 14,322  
 
Training Services
    3,711       3,593  
 
Youth Services
    1,113       961  
 
Corporate and Other
    (8,925 )     (7,805 )
 
   
     
 
 
Consolidated
  $ 13,122     $ 11,071  
 
   
     
 
EBITDAR(1):
               
 
Disabilities Services
  $ 23,909     $ 20,495  
 
Training Services
    3,773       3,638  
 
Youth Services
    1,828       1,653  
 
Corporate and Other
    (8,614 )     (7,493 )
 
   
     
 
 
Consolidated
  $ 20,896     $ 18,293  
 
   
     
 


(1)   EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDAR is defined as EBITDA before facility rent. EBITDA and EBITDAR are commonly used as analytical indicators within the health care industry, and also serve as measures of leverage capacity and debt service ability. EBITDA and EBITDAR should not be considered as measures of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the items excluded from EBITDA and EBITDAR are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. EBITDA and EBITDAR should not be considered in isolation or as alternatives to net income, cash flows generated by operating, investing or financing activities or other financial statement data presented in the consolidated financial statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. Because EBITDA and EBITDAR are not measurements determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and are thus susceptible to varying calculations, EBITDA and EBITDAR as presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

11


Table of Contents

     Consolidated revenues increased 3% for the first quarter of 2002 compared to 2001, due primarily to rate increases in various states coupled with a growth in census and increased services in our periodic services business unit. Revenues for 2001 include approximately $2.2 million related to certain operations in Tennessee which we exited in March 2001.

     Our operating results for the first quarter of 2002 as compared to the same period of 2001 were negatively impacted by increased insurance costs. Consolidated labor costs for the first quarter are up slightly from the year-earlier period due principally to increased costs in our training services division. However, our initiative to deploy the time and attendance system is showing preliminary positive results. Although consolidated labor costs increased, labor costs within the disabilities division improved quarter over quarter due to improved management of worked hours.

     The consolidated results for the first three months of 2001 were negatively impacted by certain special charges. Operating income for the first three months of 2001 included a charge of $1.6 million related to the write-off of certain assets and costs associated with the cessation of certain operations in Tennessee, and the write-off of $134,000 in deferred debt issuance costs resulting from a previous credit agreement.

     As a percentage of total revenues, corporate general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2002 were 3.9% compared to 3.5% in 2001. This relative increase was due primarily to expanding the management infrastructure at the end of the first quarter of 2001 and increased legal expenses. The change in management structure includes the addition of positions within the division for persons with disabilities and president of the division for youth services.

     Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 142 and are no longer amortizing goodwill. Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2001 includes goodwill amortization of $2.0 million, ($1.3 million, net of tax, or $0.05 per share).

     Net interest expense increased to $6.0 million in the first quarter of 2002 compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2001. This increase resulted primarily from the issuance of the $150 million senior notes in November 2001, which was used in part to reduce borrowings under our previous credit facility, combined with a higher average interest rate in 2002 (9.0%) compared with 2001 (7.5%).

     Our effective income tax rates were 37.5% and 46.1% for the first quarter of 2002 and 2001, respectively. The lower estimated annual rate of 37.5% in 2002 is primarily a result of the elimination of nondeductible goodwill amortization.

     Disabilities Services

     Results for the disabilities services segment for the first quarter of 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001 were impacted by the revenue growth and favorable labor trends described above. Revenues increased by 4% for the first quarter of 2002 compared to the same period in 2001, due primarily to rate adjustments and the expansion of existing programs. Segment profit, EBITDA and EBITDAR for the quarter were positively impacted by improved labor costs as a percent of revenue and other controllable expenses.

     During the first quarter of 2002, we completed a transaction to acquire certain operations we had previously operated under a management contract. Consideration for the acquisition totaled approximately $10 million, including $9.9 million of debt forgiven and $100,000 in cash. As a result of the transaction,

12


Table of Contents

we recorded trade accounts receivable with a fair value of approximately $4.7 million and goodwill of approximately $3.8 million, as well as other assets and liabilities.

     Training Services

     Training services revenues increased by 5% for the first quarter of 2002 compared to the same period in 2001, primarily from improved census at many of our centers. This also resulted in increases in segment profit, EBITDA and EBITDAR for the first quarter of 2002 compared to 2001.

     Youth Services

     Youth services revenues decreased 11% for the first quarter of 2002 compared to the same period in 2001, primarily from reduced census at certain operations and the closure of an operation in Puerto Rico. This decrease in revenues, offset somewhat by operating efficiencies, resulted in declined EBITDA and EBITDAR, while segment profit as a percent of revenue increased.

Financial Condition

     Total assets remained stable over the quarter, with variances in several accounts. Net accounts receivable and goodwill increased approximately $7.1 million, and $3.8 million, respectively, principally as a result of the amounts recorded in the acquisition during the quarter. Additionally, other assets decreased as a result of the forgiveness of long-term receivables in connection with the acquisition.

     Accrued expenses increased due primarily to the timing of interest payments on the senior notes and convertible notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     For the quarter ended March 31, 2002, cash provided by operating activities was $3.0 million compared to cash used of $5.4 million for the same period of 2001. This increase was primarily related to higher profitability and increased accruals for interest and insurance reserves in 2002 as compared to 2001. Additionally, the higher operating cash flow is a result of an increase in accounts receivable during the first quarter of 2002 that was approximately $4 million less than the increase during the same period in 2001. The cash flow increase was offset to some extent by a decrease in accounts payable in 2002 which was higher than that of 2001 principally due to timing of payments.

     For the quarter ended March 31, 2002, cash used in investing activities was $2.9 million compared to $1.8 million in the same period of 2001, due principally to increased maintenance capital expenditures.

     For the quarter ended March 31, 2002, cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million compared to $15.9 million in the same period of 2001. The first quarter of 2001 included the use of proceeds from sale and leaseback transactions to pay down our revolving credit facility.

     Days revenue in accounts receivable were 55 days at March 31, 2002, compared to 53 days at December 31, 2001. Accounts receivable were $139.3 million and $132.2 million at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. Approximately $4.7 million of the increase in the balance is attributable to the first quarter 2002 acquisition described previously. We continue to expand implementation of a comprehensive accounts receivable/billing system, which is expected to facilitate improvements in collections. Approximately 96% of our disabilities services operations are currently utilizing the new system with the remainder of the targeted operations expected to be completed by June 30, 2002.

13


Table of Contents

     Our capital requirements relate primarily to the working capital needed for general corporate purposes and our plans to expand through the development of new facilities and programs. We have historically satisfied our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and scheduled debt payments from our operating cash flow and utilization of our credit facility. Cash requirements for the acquisition of new business operations have generally been funded through a combination of these sources, as well as the issuance of long-term obligations and common stock.

     On November 15, 2001, we completed the issuance of $150 million of 10.625% senior notes due November 2008. The senior notes contain certain covenants restricting our ability to incur additional indebtedness (including the maintenance of a specified leverage ratio), pay dividends, enter into certain mergers, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and sell or otherwise dispose of assets. Additionally, the agreement places limits on the allowable amount of judgments or orders for the payment of money by a court of law or administrative agency.

     In November 2001, we entered into an $80 million secured credit facility with a bank group. As of March 31, 2002, we had no borrowings under the facility. There are outstanding letters-of-credit of approximately $29.7 million. Therefore, as of March 31, 2002, in addition to cash and cash equivalents of $58.8 million, we had approximately $50.3 million available under the credit facility. The credit facility expires in September 2004. The facility also contains various financial covenants relating to indebtedness, capital expenditures, acquisitions and dividends and requires us to maintain specified ratios with respect to fixed charge coverage, leverage, cash flow from operations and net worth. Additionally, the agreement places limits on the allowable amount of judgments or orders for the payment of money by a court of law. Our ability to achieve the thresholds provided for in the financial covenants is largely dependent upon the maintenance of continued profitability and/or reductions of amounts borrowed under the facility.

     We believe cash generated from operations and amounts remaining available under our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital, planned capital expenditure and scheduled debt repayment requirements for the next twelve months.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

     Information concerning our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of March 31, 2002 follows (in thousands):

                                         
Contractual Obligations Payments due by Period


            Less than 1                   After 5
    Total   year   1 – 3 years   4 – 5 years   years
   
 
 
 
 
Long-Term Debt
  $ 265,293     $ 1,065     $ 114,111     $ 34     $ 150,083  
Capital Lease Obligations
    4,323       1,134       1,077       568       1,544  
Operating Leases
    154,055       19,280       40,584       28,626       65,565  
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
  $ 423,671     $ 21,479     $ 155,772     $ 29,228     $ 217,192  
                                         
Other Commercial
Commitments
Amount of Commitments Expiration Per Period


    Total Amounts   Less than 1                   After 5
    Committed   year   1 – 3 years   4 – 5 years   years
   
 
 
 
 
Standby Letters of Credit
  $ 29,707     $ 29,707                    
 
   
     
     
     
     
 

14


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

     Refer to Page 27 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 for a description of our critical accounting policies.

Certain Risk Factors

     As part of our strategy to achieve higher internal growth in 2002, we enhanced our management structure during 2001 and are implementing other administrative initiatives. Our historical growth in revenues and earnings per share has been directly related to increases in the number of individuals served in each of our operating segments. This growth has depended largely on acquisitions of other businesses or facilities, the acquisition of management contract rights to operate facilities, the award of contracts to open new facilities or start new operations or to assume management of facilities previously operated by governmental agencies or other organizations, and the extension or renewal of contracts previously awarded to us. Our future revenues will depend primarily upon our ability to maintain, expand and renew existing service contracts and existing leases, and to a lesser extent upon our ability to obtain additional contracts to provide services to the special needs populations we serve, whether through awards in response to requests for proposals for new programs, in connection with facilities being privatized by governmental agencies, or by acquisitions that meet our criteria. Changes in the market for services and contracts, including increasing competition, transition costs or costs to implement awarded contracts, could adversely affect the timing and/or viability of future development activities. Additionally, many of our contracts are subject to state or federal government procurement rules and procedures; changes in procurement policies that may be adopted by one or more of these agencies could also adversely affect our ability to obtain and retain these contracts.

     Our revenues and operating profitability depend on our ability to maintain our existing reimbursement levels, to obtain periodic increases in reimbursement rates to meet higher costs and demands for more services, and to receive timely payment from applicable government agencies. If we do not receive or cannot negotiate increases in reimbursement rates at approximately the same time as our costs of providing services increase, our revenues and profitability could be adversely affected. Changes in how federal and state government agencies operate programs can also affect our operating results and financial condition. Government reimbursement, group home credentialing, developmental disabilities client Medicaid eligibility and service authorization procedures are often complicated and burdensome. Delays in timely payment can result from inability or problems in securing necessary eligibility documentation or in delivering service authorization paperwork between agencies. These reimbursement and procedural issues occasionally cause us to have to resubmit claims several times before payment is remitted and are primarily responsible for our aged receivables. Changes in the manner in which state agencies set reimbursement rates, interpret program policies and procedures, and review and audit billings and costs could also affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to meet obligations under our indebtedness.

     Our cost structure and ultimate operating profitability are directly related to our labor costs. Labor costs may be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including limited availability of qualified personnel in each geographic area, local competitive forces, the effective utilization of our labor force, changes in minimum wages or other direct personnel costs, strikes or work stoppages by employees represented by labor unions, and changes in client services models, such as the trends toward supported living and managed care. The difficulty experienced in hiring direct service staff in certain markets from time to time has resulted in higher labor costs in some of our operating units. These include costs associated with increased overtime, recruitment and retention, training programs, and use of temporary staffing personnel and outside clinical consultants.

15


Table of Contents

     Additionally, the maintenance and expansion of our operations depend on the continuation of trends toward downsizing, privatization and consolidation and our ability to tailor our services to meet the specific needs of the populations we serve. Our success in a changing operational environment is subject to a variety of political, economic, social and legal pressures. Such pressures include a desire of governmental agencies to reduce costs and increase levels of services; federal, state and local budgetary constraints; and actions brought by advocacy groups and the courts to change existing service delivery systems. Material changes resulting from these trends and pressures could adversely affect the demand for and reimbursement of our services, our operating flexibility and ultimately our revenues and profitability. Media coverage of the health care industry, including operators of facilities and programs for persons with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities, has from time to time included reports critical of the current trend toward privatization and of the operation of certain of these facilities and programs. Adverse media coverage about providers of these services could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny in some areas, and could adversely affect our revenues and profitability by, among other things, adversely affecting our ability to obtain or retain contracts, discouraging government agencies from privatizing facilities and programs; increasing regulation and resulting compliance costs; or discouraging clients from using our services.

     In recent years, changes in the market for insurance, particularly for professional and general liability coverage, have made it more difficult to obtain insurance coverage at reasonable rates. As a result, our insurance program for 2002 and 2001 provides for higher deductibles, lower claims limits and higher self-insurance retention levels than in previous years. The professional and general liability coverage provides for a $250,000 deductible per occurrence, and claims limits of $4.8 million per occurrence up to a $6 million annual aggregate limit. Our previous program generally provided coverage after a deductible of $10,000 per occurrence and claims limits of $1 million per occurrence up to a $3 million annual aggregate limit, plus varying amounts of excess coverage. Our workers’ compensation coverage provides for a $500,000 deductible per occurrence, and claims up to statutory limits, as compared to a $250,000 deductible per occurrence under the previous policy. We utilize historical data to estimate our reserves for our insurance programs. If losses on asserted claims exceed the current insurance coverage and accrued reserves, our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to meet obligations under our indebtedness could be adversely affected.

     The collection of accounts receivable is among our most significant management challenges and requires continual focus and involvement by members of our senior management team. Many of our accounts receivable controls have previously been managed through manual procedures, so we have expended significant effort and resources to implement a new accounts receivable/billing system. The limitations of state information systems and procedures, such as the inability to receive documentation or disperse funds electronically, may limit the benefits we derive from our new systems. We must maintain or improve our controls and procedures for managing our accounts receivable billing and collection activities if we are to collect our accounts receivable on a timely basis. An inability to do so could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness.

     Our financial results depend on timely billing of payor agencies, effectively managing collections, and efficiently utilizing our personnel to manage labor costs. We have almost completed a new comprehensive billing and collections system and an automated time and attendance system that we believe will improve our management of these functions, improve our collections experience, and reduce our operating expenses. Our financial results and condition may be adversely affected if we do not realize the anticipated benefits from our investment in these new systems or if we encounter delays or errors during implementation.

16


Table of Contents

     Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled payments on our debt obligations and maintain compliance with various financial covenants contained in our debt arrangements will depend on our future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of our control. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our debt obligations and maintain covenant compliance, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. We can provide no assurance that any refinancing would be possible, that any assets could be sold, or, if sold, of the timing of the sales and the amount of proceeds realized from those sales, or that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations, maintain covenant compliance or refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as on our ability to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness.

     We must comply with comprehensive government regulation of our business, including statutes, regulations and policies governing the licensing of our facilities, the quality of our service, the revenues we receive for our services, and reimbursement for the cost of our services. If we fail to comply with these laws, we can lose contracts and revenues, thereby harming our financial results. State and federal regulatory agencies have broad discretionary powers over the administration and enforcement of laws and regulations that govern our operations. A material violation of a law or regulation could subject us to fines and penalties and in some circumstances could disqualify some or all of the facilities and programs under our control from future participation in Medicaid or other government programs. Furthermore, future regulation or legislation affecting our programs may require us to change our operations significantly or incur increased costs.

     Our success in obtaining new contracts and renewals of our existing contracts depends upon maintaining our reputation as a quality service provider among governmental authorities, advocacy groups for persons with developmental disabilities and their families, and the public. We also rely on government entities to refer clients to our facilities and programs. Negative publicity, changes in public perception, the actions of consumers under our care or investigations with respect to our industry, operations or policies could increase government scrutiny, increase compliance costs, hinder our ability to obtain or retain contracts, reduce referrals, discourage privatization of facilities and programs, and discourage clients from using our services. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and condition.

     Our management of residential, training, educational and support programs for our clients exposes us to potential claims or litigation by our clients or other persons for wrongful death, personal injury or other damages resulting from contact with our facilities, programs, personnel or other clients. Regulatory agencies may initiate administrative proceedings alleging violations of statutes and regulations arising from our programs and facilities and seeking to impose monetary penalties on us. We could be required to pay substantial amounts of money in damages or penalties arising from these legal proceedings and some awards of damages or penalties may not be covered by any insurance. If our third-party insurance coverage and self-insurance reserves are not adequate to cover these claims, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness.

17


Table of Contents

     We derive virtually all of our revenues from federal, state and local government agencies, including state Medicaid programs. Our revenues, therefore, are determined by the size of the governmental appropriations for the services we provide. Budgetary pressures, as well as economic, industry, political and other factors, could influence governments not to increase (and possibly to decrease) appropriations for these services, which could reduce our margins materially. Future federal or state initiatives could institute managed care programs for persons we serve or otherwise make material changes to the Medicaid program as it now exists. Federal, state and local government agencies generally condition their contracts with us upon a sufficient budgetary appropriation. If a government agency does not receive an appropriation sufficient to cover their contractual obligations with us, they may terminate a contract or defer or reduce our reimbursement. The loss or reduction of reimbursement under our contracts in states where we have significant operations could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

     In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. Statement 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, we are required to capitalize the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Statement 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, and we will adopt it effective January 1, 2003. We have not yet determined the impact Statement 143 will have on our results of operations or financial condition.

     Refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of recently adopted accounting pronouncements.

Forward-Looking Statements

     Statements in this report that are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. In addition, we expect to make such forward-looking statements in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by us or with our approval. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (1) projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, capital structure and other financial items; (2) statements of plans and objectives of ResCare or our management or Board of Directors; (3) statements of future actions or economic performance, including development activities; and (4) statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “targeted,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.

     Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. Some of the events or circumstances that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements are discussed in the “Certain Risk Factors” section above. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date on which such statement is made.

18


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

     While we are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our outstanding variable rate debt, we do not currently utilize any derivative financial instruments related to our interest rate exposure. At March 31, 2002, we had variable rate debt outstanding of approximately $2.1 million as compared to $2.4 million outstanding at December 31, 2001. Accordingly, we do not presently believe we have material exposure to market risk. Our exposure to market risk may change as we utilize our credit facility in 2002.

19


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     In July 2000, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, or AISL, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. In the Complaint, AISL sought a declaration of what insurance coverage was available to ResCare in Cause No. 299291-401; In re: Estate of Trenia Wright, Deceased, et al. v. Res-Care, Inc., et al., which was filed in Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County, Texas (the Lawsuit). After the filing, we entered into an agreement with AISL whereby the claims in the Lawsuit were covered under the insurance policies issued by AISL. AISL thereafter settled the Lawsuit for $9 million. It is our position that the Lawsuit initiated coverage under policies of insurance in more than one policy year, thus affording adequate coverage to settle the Lawsuit within coverage and policy limits and that AISL waived any applicable exclusions for punitive damages. On November 23, 2001, a summary judgment was granted in favor of AISL, which was reduced to a final judgment on February 26, 2002. On March 8, 2002, we filed a motion for new trial and to alter judgment which is pending before the trial judge. In our opinion, after consulting with outside trial counsel and special counsel engaged to review the decision, substantial grounds exist for a successful appeal. We have not made any provision in our consolidated financial statements for any potential liability that may result from final adjudication of this matter. We do not believe it is probable that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

     In October 2000, ResCare and one of our subsidiaries, Res-Care Florida, Inc., f/k/a Normal Life Florida, Inc., entered into an agreement with AISL to resolve through binding arbitration a dispute as to the amount of coverage available to settle a lawsuit that had previously been filed in Pinellas County Circuit Court, Florida and subsequently settled after we entered into the agreement. AISL contends that a portion of the settlement reached was comprised of punitive damages and, therefore, not the responsibility of AISL. It is our position that the settlement was an amount that a reasonable and prudent insurer would pay for the actual damages alleged and that AISL had opportunities to settle all claims within available coverage limits. Binding arbitration was held on January 15 and 16, 2002, and on February 14, 2002, a decision was entered in our favor stating that the underlying settlement was within the coverage limits of our policy and also awarding us attorney fees and costs.

     On September 2, 2001, in a case styled Nellie Lake, Individually as an Heir-at-Law of Christina Zellner, deceased; and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christina Zellner v. Res-Care, Inc., et al., in the U.S. District Court of the District of Kansas at Wichita, a jury awarded noneconomic damages to Ms. Lake in the amount of $100,000, the statutory maximum, as well as $5,000 for economic loss. In addition, the jury awarded the Estate of Christina Zellner $5,000 of noneconomic damages and issued an advisory opinion recommending an award of $2.5 million in punitive damages. The judge, however, was not required to award the amount of punitive damages recommended by the jury and on February 4, 2002, entered a punitive damage judgment in the amount of $1 million. Based on the advice of counsel, we appealed the award of punitive damages, based on numerous appealable errors at trial. Based on the advice of counsel, we believe any damages resulting from this matter are covered by insurance and, accordingly, we have not made any provision in our consolidated financial statements for any potential liability that may result from final adjudication of this matter. We do not believe it is probable that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

20


Table of Contents

     In September 1997, a lawsuit, styled Cause No. 98-00740, Nancy Chesser v. Normal Life of Texas, Inc., and Normal Life, Inc. District Court of Travis County, Texas was filed against a Texas facility operated by the former owners of Normal Life, Inc. and Normal Life of North Texas, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, asserting causes of action for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and retaliation regarding the discharge of residents of the facility. In May 2000, a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff awarding the plaintiff damages, prejudgment interest and attorneys’ fees totaling $4.8 million. In October 2000, ResCare and AISL entered into an agreement whereby any settlement reached in Chesser and a related lawsuit also filed in the District Court of Travis County, Texas would not be dispositive of whether the claims in those suits were covered under the policies issued by AISL. AISL thereafter settled the suits and filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Normal Life of North Texas, Inc. and Normal Life, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. In the Complaint, AISL seeks a declaration of what insurance coverage is available to ResCare in the lawsuits. It is our position that the lawsuits initiated coverage under the primary policies of insurance, thus affording adequate coverage to settle the lawsuits within coverage and policy limits. The trial of this declaratory judgment action previously scheduled for trial in March 2002 has been postponed with no new trial date set. We do not believe it is probable that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

     In addition, we are a party to various other legal and/or administrative proceedings arising out of the operation of our facilities and programs and arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, generally, these claims are without merit. Further, many of such claims may be covered by insurance. We do not believe the results of these proceedings or claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

21


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

         
(a) Exhibits
 
  10.1 Letter Agreement dated March 8, 2002 terminating Jeffrey M. Cross’ Employment Agreement.
 
  10.2 Employment Agreement between Res-Care, Inc. and William J Ballard dated January 13, 2002.
         
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
 
              On March 6, 2002, we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K announcing our financial results for the fourth quarter and the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
              On May 3, 2002, we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K announcing our financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2002.

22


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

         
 
RES-CARE, INC.
Registrant
       
 
 
 
Date:     May 15, 2002

  By: /s/   Ronald G. Geary

Ronald G. Geary
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
Date:     May 15, 2002

  By: /s/   L. Bryan Shaul

L. Bryan Shaul
Executive Vice President of Finance &
Administration and Chief Financial Officer

23