XML 99 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Nov. 03, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets

Goodwill
The Company's annual measurement date for its goodwill impairment test is the first day of its fourth quarter. The Company also tests for impairment if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. As discussed in Note 1, the Company reorganized its reportable segments in the third quarter of 2012. This realignment had no impact on the classification of goodwill at the reporting unit level.

The assumptions, inputs and judgments used in performing the valuation analysis are inherently subjective and reflect estimates based on known facts and circumstances at the time the Company performs the valuation. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to, the discount rate, terminal growth rate, EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) and capital expenditure forecasts. The use of different assumptions, inputs and judgments or changes in circumstances could materially affect the results of the valuation. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual results could differ from the Company's estimates. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies the Company used to derive and test the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting units:

Income approach: To determine fair value, the Company discounted the expected cash flows of the reporting units. The Company calculated expected cash flows using forecasted annual revenue growth rates between approximately 3% - 14% for each reporting unit over the next five years. The Company used discount rates between approximately 13% - 14%, which represent the estimated weighted average cost of capital and reflect the overall level of inherent risk involved in the respective operations and the rate of return expected by market participants. To estimate cash flows beyond the final year of the forecast of five years, the Company used terminal growth rates of between approximately 2% - 3% and incorporated the present value of the resulting terminal value into its estimate of fair value.

Guideline public company multiples: The Company used the guideline public company method to select reasonably similar/guideline publicly traded companies for each of the Company's reporting units. Using the guideline public company method, the Company calculated EBITDA multiples for each of the public companies using both historical and forecasted EBITDA figures. By applying these multiples to the appropriate historical and forecasted EBITDA figures for each reporting unit, fair value estimates were calculated.

The Company weighted the discounted cash flow method by 100% in the valuation of each reporting unit and relied upon fair value estimates for each reporting unit using the public company and transaction multiples to test the reasonableness of the fair value estimates under the discounted cash flow method.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company concluded that the fair value of its Packaging Technologies reporting unit requires no impairment. Packaging Technologies has a goodwill balance of $47,466 and is the only reporting unit with a goodwill balance as of fiscal year-end 2012. Packaging Technologies fair value exceeded its carrying amount of total assets by approximately 12%. The fair value is based on growth assumptions and certain market conditions which may differ from actual results and potentially have a negative effect on the fair value estimate. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company concluded that the fair value of its Custom Sheet and Rollstock reporting unit was significantly below its carrying amount and that all of this reporting unit's goodwill was impaired.  The $40,455 impairment was caused by a lower aggregate market capitalization as well as lower 2011 earnings for this business. The Company's estimated goodwill fair value of zero for this business was based upon third-party valuations and internal estimates of discounted cash flows.  In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company concluded that the fair value of goodwill in its Packaging Technologies and Color and Specialty Compounds reporting units were significantly below their carrying amounts and recorded goodwill impairments of $44,800 and $11,349, respectively.  The impairments were caused by lower earnings in these businesses and a difference between the Company's enterprise value and book value.   The Company measured the impairments based upon a third-party valuations and internal estimates of discounted cash flows.  Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended November 3, 2012 and October 29, 2011 are as follows:

 
Custom Sheet and
Rollstock
 
Packaging
Technologies
 
Color and Specialty
Compounds
 
Total
Goodwill balance as of October 30, 2010
$
40,455

 
$
47,466

 
$

 
$
87,921

Impairment
(40,455
)
 

 

 
(40,455
)
Goodwill balance as of October 29, 2011

 
47,466

 

 
47,466

Impairment

 

 

 

Goodwill balance as of November 3, 2012
$

 
$
47,466

 
$

 
$
47,466


Identifiable Intangible Assets
As of November 3, 2012 and October 29, 2011, the Company had amortizable intangible assets as follows:

 
2012
 
2011
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying
Amount
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
 
Net Carrying
Amount
Customer contracts / relationships
$
5,460

 
$
(3,395
)
 
$
2,065

 
$
5,460

 
$
(2,975
)
 
 
$
2,485

Product formulations / trademarks
19,943

 
(10,826
)
 
9,117

 
19,943

 
(9,556
)
 
 
10,387

 
$
25,403

 
$
(14,221
)
 
$
11,182

 
$
25,403

 
$
(12,531
)
 
 
$
12,872



Amortization expense for intangible assets totaled $1,689, $1,689 and $3,774 in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets over the next five years is estimated to be:

Year Ended
 
Intangible
Amortization
2013
 
$
1,689

2014
 
1,677

2015
 
1,546

2016
 
1,546

2017
 
1,239

Thereafter
 
3,485

 
 
$
11,182



The Company performs annual impairment analyses pursuant to ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, for certain other intangible assets that had indications that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on the Company's impairment analyses using the expected present value of future cash flows, the Company determined that certain intangible assets were either fully or partially impaired in 2010. Accordingly, the Company recorded $10,013 of impairments to write down these intangible assets to fair value in 2010. Intangible asset impairments of $204, $7,020, and $2,789 were recorded in the Custom Sheet and Rollstock, Packaging Technologies, and Color and Specialty Compounds segments, respectively.