10-Q

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to _____

Commission file number 1-8974

Honeywell International Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	22-2640650
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
101 Columbia Road Morris Township, New Jersey	07962
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(973) 455-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-Accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

There were 780,568,568 shares of Common Stock outstanding at June 30, 2012.

Honeywell International Inc.
Index

			Page No.
Part I.		Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements:
		Consolidated Statement of Operations (unaudited) – Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	3
		Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) – Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	4
		Consolidated Balance Sheet (unaudited) – June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	5
		Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	6
		Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	31
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	45
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	45
Part II.		Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	45
	Item 6.	Exhibits	46
Signatures			47

Cautionary Statement about Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are those that address activities, events or developments that we or our management intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future. They are based on management’s assumptions and assessments in the light of past experience and trends, current economic and industry conditions, expected future developments and other relevant factors. They are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those envisaged by our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are also subject to risks and uncertainties, which can affect our performance in both the near- and long-term. These forward-looking statements should be considered in the light of the information included in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the Risk Factors, as well as the description of trends and other factors in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The financial information as of June 30, 2012 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contained in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Honeywell International Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Product sales	$	7,475		$	7,146		$	14,852		$	13,959
Service sales		1,960			1,940			3,890			3,799
Net sales		9,435			9,086			18,742			17,758
Costs, expenses and other
Cost of products sold		5,582			5,425			11,153			10,619
Cost of services sold		1,340			1,239			2,649			2,469
		6,922			6,664			13,802			13,088
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1,226			1,248			2,457			2,480
Other (income) expense		(23	)		(22	)		(38	)		(51	)
Interest and other financial charges		87			96			176			195
		8,212			7,986			16,397			15,712
Income from continuing operations before taxes		1,223			1,100			2,345			2,046
Tax expense		318			304			615			560
Income from continuing operations after taxes		905			796			1,730			1,486
Income from discontinued operations after taxes		—			14			—			32
Net income		905			810			1,730			1,518
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		3			—			5			3
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	902		$	810		$	1,725		$	1,515
Amounts attributable to Honeywell:
Income from continuing operations less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		902			796			1,725			1,483
Income from discontinued operations		—			14			—			32
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	902		$	810		$	1,725		$	1,515
Earnings per share of common stock - basic:
Income from continuing operations		1.15			1.01			2.21			1.89
Income from discontinuing operations		—			0.02			—			0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.15		$	1.03		$	2.21		$	1.93
Earnings per share of common stock - assuming dilution:
Income from continuing operations		1.14			1.00			2.19			1.86
Income from discontinuing operations		—			0.02			—			0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.14		$	1.02		$	2.19		$	1.90
Cash dividends per share of common stock	$	0.3725		$	0.3325		$	0.7450		$	0.6650

The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.

3

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)

	Three months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(Dollars in millions)						(Dollars in millions)
Net income	$	905		$	810		$	1,730		$	1,518
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign exchange translation adjustment		(420	)		116			(231	)		507
Actuarial gains		5			25			5			25
Prior service credit		—			10			—			10
Prior service credit (cost) recognized during the year		1			(1	)		3			(4	)
Actuarial losses recognized during year		3			4			10			10
Settlements and curtailments		(4	)		(35	)		(2	)		(35	)
Foreign exchange translation and other		1			1			1			1
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments		6			4			17			7
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period		(5	)		28			38			8
Changes in fair value of available for sale investments		(5	)		28			38			8
Effective portion of cash flow hedges recognized in OCI		(48	)		7			(23	)		15
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income		(12	)		4			(6	)		6
Changes in fair value of effective cash flow hedges		(36	)		3			(17	)		9
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(455	)		151			(193	)		531
Comprehensive income		450			961			1,537			2,049
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1	)		—			3			3
Comprehensive income attributable to Honeywell	$	451		$	961		$	1,534		$	2,046

The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.

4

Honeywell International Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(Dollars in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,221		$	3,698
Accounts, notes and other receivables		7,250			7,228
Inventories		4,342			4,264
Deferred income taxes		269			460
Investments and other current assets		562			484
Total current assets		16,644			16,134
Investments and long-term receivables		566			494
Property, plant and equipment - net		4,735			4,804
Goodwill		11,837			11,858
Other intangible assets - net		2,325			2,477
Insurance recoveries for asbestos related liabilities		672			709
Deferred income taxes		2,164			2,132
Other assets		1,231			1,200
Total assets	$	40,174		$	39,808
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,547		$	4,738
Short-term borrowings		65			60
Commercial paper		948			599
Current maturities of long-term debt		620			15
Accrued liabilities		6,632			6,863
Total current liabilities		12,812			12,275
Long-term debt		6,342			6,881
Deferred income taxes		681			676
Postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions		1,365			1,417
Asbestos related liabilities		1,522			1,499
Other liabilities		5,369			6,158
SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY
Capital - common stock issued		958			958
- additional paid-in capital		4,201			4,157
Common stock held in treasury, at cost		(8,751	)		(8,948	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,637	)		(1,444	)
Retained earnings		17,222			16,083
Total Honeywell shareowners’ equity		11,993			10,806
Noncontrolling interest		90			96
Total shareowners’ equity		12,083			10,902
Total liabilities and shareowners’ equity	$	40,174		$	39,808

The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.

5

Honeywell International Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
	(Dollars in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1,725		$	1,515
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to Honeywell to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		455			478
Loss/(gain) on sale of non-strategic businesses and assets		1			(46	)
Repositioning and other charges		256			227
Net payments for repositioning and other charges		(226	)		(207	)
Pension and other postretirement expense		54			32
Pension and other postretirement benefit payments		(597	)		(1,082	)
Stock compensation expense		91			91
Deferred income taxes		189			158
Excess tax benefits from share based payment arrangements		(16	)		(30	)
Other		(104	)		140
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
Accounts, notes and other receivables		(20	)		(537	)
Inventories		(78	)		(389	)
Other current assets		(15	)		(23	)
Accounts payable		(191	)		260
Accrued liabilities		(355	)		108
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,169			695
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(352	)		(289	)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment		1			3
Increase in investments		(245	)		(229	)
Decrease in investments		158			176
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(64	)		(8	)
Proceeds from sales of businesses, net of fees paid		18			215
Other		(59	)		58
Net cash used for investing activities		(543	)		(74	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in commercial paper		349			51
Net increase/(decrease) in short-term borrowings		11			(2	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		116			200
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		42			1,384
Payments of long-term debt		—			(439	)
Excess tax benefits from share based payment arrangements		16			30
Repurchases of common stock		—			(504	)
Cash dividends paid		(582	)		(530	)
Net cash (used for)/provided by financing activities		(48	)		190
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(55	)		87
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		523			898
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,698			2,650
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	4,221		$	3,548

The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.

6

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

          In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of Honeywell International Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries at June 30, 2012 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 should not necessarily be taken as indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the entire year. We have evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of our consolidated financial statements.

          We report our quarterly financial information using a calendar convention; that is, the first, second and third quarters are consistently reported as ending on March 31, June 30 and September 30, respectively. It has been our practice to establish actual quarterly closing dates using a predetermined “fiscal” calendar, which requires our businesses to close their books on a Saturday in order to minimize the potentially disruptive effects of quarterly closing on our business processes. The effects of this practice are generally not significant to reported results for any quarter and only exist within a reporting year. In the event that differences in actual closing dates are material to year-over-year comparisons of quarterly or year-to-date results, we provide appropriate disclosures. Our actual closing dates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, respectively.

          The financial information as of June 30, 2012 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contained in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

          Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

          The Consumer Products Group (CPG) automotive aftermarket business (divested in July 2011) had historically been part of the Transportation Systems reportable segment. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, CPG results are excluded from continuing operations and are presented as discontinued operations in all periods presented. See Note 3 Divestitures for further details.

Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

          Changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of accounting standards updates (ASU’s) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification.

          The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASU’s. ASU’s not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

          In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to disclosure requirements for common fair value measurement. These amendments, effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), result in common definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Consequently, the amendments change some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The implementation of the amended accounting guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

          In June 2011, the FASB issued amendments to disclosure requirements for presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance, effective retrospectively for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted), requires presentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the

7

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

FASB issued an amendment to defer the presentation on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements. The implementation of the amended accounting guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

          In September 2011, the FASB issued amendments to the goodwill impairment guidance which provides an option for companies to use a qualitative approach to test goodwill for impairment if certain conditions are met. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted). The implementation of the amended accounting guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 3. Divestitures

          In July 2011, the Company sold its Consumer Products Group business (CPG) to Rank Group Limited. The sale was completed for approximately $955 million in cash proceeds, resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $301 million and approximately $178 million net of tax. The gain was recorded in net income from discontinued operations after taxes in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. The net income attributable to the non-controlling interest for the discontinued operations was insignificant. The sale of CPG, which had been part of the Transportation Systems segment, is consistent with the Company’s strategic focus on its portfolio of differentiated global technologies.

Note 4. Repositioning and Other Charges

     A summary of repositioning and other charges follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Severance	$	37		$	16		$	52		$	43
Asset impairments		2			—			11			10
Exit costs		8			1			16			12
Adjustments		(23	)		(10	)		(30	)		(14	)
Total net repositioning charge		24			7			49			51
Asbestos related litigation charges, net of insurance		43			40			79			78
Probable and reasonably estimable environmental liabilities		67			50			128			101
Other		—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Total net repositioning and other charges	$	134		$	94		$	256		$	227

8

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

     The following table summarizes the pretax distribution of total net repositioning and other charges by income statement classification:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of products and services sold	$	132	$	84	$	251	$	202
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2		10		5		25
	$	134	$	94	$	256	$	227

     The following table summarizes the pretax impact of total net repositioning and other charges by segment:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
Aerospace	$	—	$	(6	)	$	1	$	(6	)
Automation and Control Solutions		10		12			9		45
Performance Materials and Technologies		—		—			14		13
Transportation Systems		60		40			112		76
Corporate		64		48			120		99
	$	134	$	94		$	256	$	227

          In the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we recognized repositioning charges totaling $47 million including severance costs of $37 million (related to workforce reductions of 559 manufacturing and administrative positions) in our Automation and Control Solutions, Transportation Systems and Aerospace segments. The workforce reductions were primarily related to cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives. The repositioning charge also included exit costs of $8 million mainly related to closure obligations associated with the planned shutdown of a Transportation Systems manufacturing facility. Also, $23 million of previously established accruals for severance in our Automation and Control Solutions and Aerospace segments were returned to income in the second quarter of 2012 due primarily to fewer employee severance actions caused by higher attrition than originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

          In the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we recognized repositioning charges totaling $17 million primarily for severance costs related to workforce reductions of 360 manufacturing and administrative positions in our Automation and Control Solutions and Aerospace segments. The workforce reductions were related to cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives and the consolidation of U.S. repair facilities in our Aerospace segment. Also, $10 million of previously established accruals for severance at our Aerospace segment were returned to income in the second quarter of 2011 due to fewer employee separations than originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

          In the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized repositioning charges totaling $79 million including severance costs of $52 million related to workforce reductions of 1,177 manufacturing and administrative positions across all of our segments. The workforce reductions were primarily related to the planned shutdown of a manufacturing facility in our Transportation Systems segment, the exit from a product line in our Performance Materials and Technologies segment, and cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives. The repositioning charge also included asset impairments of $11 million principally related to manufacturing plant and equipment associated with the exit of a product line in our Performance Materials and Technologies segment. The repositioning charge also included exit costs of $16 million principally related to closure obligations associated with the planned shutdown of manufacturing facilities and exit of a product line. Also, $30 million of previously established accruals for severance at our Automation and Control Solutions and Aerospace segments were returned to income in the first

9

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

six months of 2012 due primarily to fewer employee severance actions caused by higher attrition than originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

          In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized repositioning charges totaling $65 million including severance costs of $43 million related to workforce reductions of 946 manufacturing and administrative positions in our Automation and Control Solutions, Aerospace and Performance Materials and Technologies segments. The workforce reductions were primarily related to cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives, factory transitions in connection with acquisition-related synergies in our Automation and Control Solutions segment, the exit from and/or rationalization of certain product lines and markets in our Performance Materials and Technologies and Automation and Control Solutions segments, the consolidation of U.S. repair facilities in our Aerospace segment, and an organizational realignment of a business in our Automation and Control Solutions segment. The repositioning charge also included asset impairments of $10 million principally related to manufacturing plant and equipment associated with the exit of a product line and a factory transition as discussed above. The repositioning charge also included exit costs of $12 million principally for costs to terminate contracts, including an operating lease, related to the exit of a market and a factory transition as discussed above. Also, $14 million of previously established accruals, primarily for severance at our Aerospace and Automation and Control Solutions segments, were returned to income in the first six months of 2011 due principally to fewer employee separations than originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

     The following table summarizes the status of our total repositioning reserves:

	Severance Costs			Asset Impairments			Exit Costs			Total
December 31, 2011	$	353		$	—		$	59		$	412
Charges		52			11			16			79
Usage - cash		(58	)		—			(15	)		(73	)
Usage - noncash		—			(11	)		—			(11	)
Foreign currency translation		(13	)		—			—			(13	)
Adjustments		(30	)		—			—			(30	)
June 30, 2012	$	304		$	—		$	60		$	364

          Certain repositioning projects in our Aerospace, Automation and Control Solutions and Transportation Systems segments included exit or disposal activities, the costs related to which will be recognized in future periods when the actual liability is incurred. The nature of these exit or disposal costs includes asset set-up and moving, product recertification and requalification, and employee retention, training and travel. The following tables summarize by segment, expected, incurred and remaining exit and disposal costs related to 2011 and 2010 repositioning actions which we were not able to recognize at the time the actions were initiated. The exit and disposal costs related to the repositioning actions in 2012 which we were not able to recognize at the time the actions were initiated were not significant.

2011 Repositioning Actions	Aerospace			Automation and Control Solutions			Transportation Systems		Total
Expected exit and disposal costs	$	15		$	15		$	7	$	37
Costs incurred during:
Year ended December 31, 2011		(1	)		—			—		(1	)
Current year-to-date		—			(3	)		—		(3	)
Remaining exit and disposal costs at June 30, 2012	$	14		$	12		$	7	$	33

10

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

2010 Repositioning Actions	Aerospace			Automation and Control Solutions			Transportation Systems			Total
Expected exit and disposal costs	$	11		$	10		$	2		$	23
Costs incurred during:
Year ended December 31, 2010		—			—			—			—
Year ended December 31, 2011		(2	)		(3	)		(1	)		(6	)
Current year-to-date		—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Remaining exit and disposal costs at June 30, 2012	$	9		$	7		$	—		$	16

          In the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we recognized a charge of $67 million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the quarter. We also recognized a charge of $43 million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2012, net of probable insurance recoveries. Environmental and Asbestos matters are discussed in detail in Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies.

          In the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a charge of $50 million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the quarter. We also recognized a charge of $40 million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2011, net of probable insurance recoveries.

          In the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized a charge of $128 million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the period. We also recognized a charge of $79 million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2012, net of probable insurance recoveries.

          In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a charge of $101 million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the period. We also recognized a charge of $78 million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2011, net of probable insurance recoveries.

Note 5. Other (Income) Expense

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Equity (income)/loss of affiliated companies	$	(14	)	$	(14	)	$	(24	)	$	(23	)
Loss/(gain) on sale of non-strategic businesses and assets		1			(2	)		1			(46	)
Interest income		(14	)		(14	)		(28	)		(27	)
Foreign exchange		3			10			13			18
Other, net		1			(2	)		—			27
	$	(23	)	$	(22	)	$	(38	)	$	(51	)

11

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          Gain on sale of non-strategic businesses and assets in the six months ended June 30, 2011 includes a $41 million pre-tax gain, $25 million net of tax, related to the divestiture of the automotive on-board sensor products business within our Automation and Control Solutions segment.

          Other, net in the six months ended June 30, 2011 includes a loss of $29 million resulting from early redemption of debt.

Note 6. Earnings Per Share

          The details of the earnings per share calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Basic
Income from continuing operations less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	902	$	796	$	1,725	$	1,483
Income from discontinued operations		—		14		—		32
Net income attributable to Honeywell		902		810		1,725		1,515
Weighted average shares outstanding		781.4		785.0		779.3		785.2
Earnings per share of common stock
Income from continuing operations		1.15		1.01		2.21		1.89
Income from discontinued operations		—		0.02		—		0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.15	$	1.03	$	2.21	$	1.93
	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Assuming Dilution
Income from continuing operations less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	902	$	796	$	1,725	$	1,483
Income from discontinued operations		—		14		—		32
Net income attributable to Honeywell		902		810		1,725		1,515
Average Shares
Weighted average shares outstanding		781.4		785.0		779.3		785.2
Dilutive securities issuable - stock plans		9.1		12.3		10.0		12.3
Total weighted average shares outstanding		790.5		797.3		789.3		797.5
Earnings per share of common stock
Income from continuing operations		1.14		1.00		2.19		1.86
Income from discontinued operations		—		0.02		—		0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.14	$	1.02	$	2.19	$	1.90

          The diluted earnings per share calculations exclude the effect of stock options when the options’ assumed proceeds exceed the average market price of the common shares during the period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the weighted average number of stock options excluded from the computations were 16.6 and 13.1 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the weighted

12

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

average number of stock options excluded from the computations were 7.9 and 7.5 million, respectively. These stock options were outstanding at the end of each of the respective periods.

Note 7. Accounts, Notes and Other Receivables

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Trade	$	6,946	$	6,926
Other		529		555
		7,475		7,481
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts		225		253
	$	7,250	$	7,228

          Trade Receivables includes $1,538 and $1,404 million of unbilled balances under long-term contracts as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These amounts are billed in accordance with the terms of customer contracts to which they relate.

Note 8. Inventories

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Raw materials	$	1,222		$	1,222
Work in process		887			958
Finished products		2,432			2,253
		4,541			4,433
Reduction to LIFO cost basis		(199	)		(169	)
	$	4,342		$	4,264

Note 9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - Net

          The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2012 by segment is as follows:

	December 31, 2011		Acquisitions		Divestitures			Currency Translation Adjustment			June 30, 2012
Aerospace	$	2,095	$	2	$	(3	)	$	(2	)	$	2,092
Automation and Control Solutions		8,260		45		—			(58	)		8,247
Performance Materials and Technologies		1,306		—		—			(5	)		1,301
Transportation Systems		197		—		—			—			197
	$	11,858	$	47	$	(3	)	$	(65	)	$	11,837

13

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

	June 30, 2012							December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Determinable life intangibles:
Patents and technology	$	1,134	$	(796	)	$	338	$	1,151	$	(761	)	$	390
Customer relationships		1,707		(552	)		1,155		1,718		(493	)		1,225
Trademarks		156		(92	)		64		155		(84	)		71
Other		189		(136	)		53		211		(145	)		66
		3,186		(1,576	)		1,610		3,235		(1,483	)		1,752
Indefinite life intangibles:
Trademarks		715		—			715		725		—			725
	$	3,901	$	(1,576	)	$	2,325	$	3,960	$	(1,483	)	$	2,477

          Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $126 and $125 million, respectively.

          We completed our annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles as of March 31, 2012 and determined that there was no impairment as of that date. No matters have arisen subsequent to that date which have resulted in a change to this assessment.

Note 10. Long-term Debt and Credit Agreements

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
4.25% notes due 2013	$	600	$	600
3.875% notes due 2014		600		600
5.40% notes due 2016		400		400
5.30% notes due 2017		400		400
5.30% notes due 2018		900		900
5.00% notes due 2019		900		900
4.25% notes due 2021		800		800
5.375% notes due 2041		600		600
Industrial development bond obligations, floating rate maturing at various dates through 2037		37		37
6.625% debentures due 2028		216		216
9.065% debentures due 2033		51		51
5.70% notes due 2036		550		550
5.70% notes due 2037		600		600
Other (including capitalized leases), 0.6%-9.5% maturing at various dates through 2023		308		242
		6,962		6,896
Less: Current portion		620		15
	$	6,342	$	6,881

14

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          The schedule of principal payments on long term debt is as follows:

	June 30, 2012
2012	$	15
2013		637
2014		627
2015		4
2016		455
Thereafter		5,224
		6,962
Less: Current portion		620
	$	6,342

          On April 2, 2012, the Company entered into a $3,000 million Amended and Restated Five Year Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. Commitments under the Credit Agreement can be increased pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement to an aggregate amount not to exceed $3,500 million. The Credit Agreement contains a $700 million sub-limit for the issuance of letters of credit. The Credit Agreement is maintained for general corporate purposes and amends and restates the previous $2,800 million five year credit agreement dated March 31, 2011 (“Prior Agreement”). There have been no borrowings under the Credit Agreement or the Prior Agreement.

          The Credit Agreement does not restrict our ability to pay dividends and contains no financial covenants. The failure to comply with customary conditions or the occurrence of customary events of default contained in the credit agreement would prevent any further borrowings and would generally require the repayment of any outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement. Such events of default include: (a) non-payment of credit agreement debt, interest or fees; (b) non-compliance with the terms of the credit agreement covenants; (c) cross-default to other debt in certain circumstances; (d) bankruptcy or insolvency; and (e) defaults upon obligations under Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Additionally, each of the banks has the right to terminate its commitment to lend additional funds or issue letters of credit under the agreement if any person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 30 percent or more of our voting stock, or, during any 12-month period, individuals who were directors of Honeywell at the beginning of the period cease to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors.

          The Credit Agreement has substantially the same material terms and conditions as the Prior Agreement with an improvement in pricing and an extension of maturity. Loans under the Credit Agreement are required to be repaid no later than April 2, 2017, unless such date is extended pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement. We have agreed to pay a facility fee of 0.08 percent per annum on the aggregate commitment.

          Revolving credit borrowings under the Credit Agreement would bear interest, at Honeywell’s option, (A) (1) at a rate equal to the highest of (a) the floating base rate publicly announced by Citibank, N.A., (b) 0.5% above the Federal funds rate or (c) Libor plus 1.00%, plus (2) a margin based on Honeywell’s credit default swap mid-rate spread and subject to a floor and a cap as set forth in the Credit Agreement (the “Applicable Margin”) minus 1.00%, provided such margin shall not be less than zero; or (B) at a rate equal to Libor plus the Applicable Margin; or (C) by a competitive bidding procedure.

          The facility fee and the letter of credit issuance fee are subject to change, based upon a grid determined by our long term debt ratings. The Credit Agreement is not subject to termination based upon a decrease in our debt ratings or a material adverse change.

          As a source of liquidity, we sell interests in designated pools of trade accounts receivables to third parties. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 none of the receivables in the designated pools had been sold to third parties. When we sell receivables, they are over-collateralized and we retain a subordinated interest in the pool of receivables representing that over-collateralization as well as an undivided interest in the balance of the receivables pools. The terms of the trade accounts receivable program permit the repurchase of receivables from the third parties at our discretion, providing us with an additional source of revolving credit. As a result, program

15

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

receivables remain on the Company’s balance sheet with a corresponding amount recorded as either Short-term borrowings or Long-term debt.

Note 11. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures

          Credit and Market Risk—Financial instruments, including derivatives, expose us to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and to market risk related to changes in interest and currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We manage our exposure to counterparty credit risk through specific minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties, and procedures to monitor concentrations of credit risk. Our counterparties in derivative transactions are substantial investment and commercial banks with significant experience using such derivative instruments. We monitor the impact of market risk on the fair value and cash flows of our derivative and other financial instruments considering reasonably possible changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates and commodity prices and restrict the use of derivative financial instruments to hedging activities.

          We continually monitor the creditworthiness of our customers to which we grant credit terms in the normal course of business. The terms and conditions of our credit sales are designed to mitigate or eliminate concentrations of credit risk with any single customer. Our sales are not materially dependent on a single customer or a small group of customers.

          Foreign Currency Risk Management—We conduct our business on a multinational basis in a wide variety of foreign currencies. Our exposure to market risk for changes in foreign currency exchange rates arises from international financing activities between subsidiaries, foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and transactions arising from international trade. Our objective is to preserve the economic value of nonfunctional currency denominated cash flows. We attempt to hedge transaction exposures with natural offsets to the fullest extent possible and, once these opportunities have been exhausted, through foreign currency exchange forward and option contracts with third parties.

          We hedge monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies. Prior to conversion into U.S. dollars, these assets and liabilities are remeasured at spot exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet date. The effects of changes in spot rates are recognized in earnings and included in Other (Income) Expense. We partially hedge forecasted sales and purchases, which predominantly occur in the next twelve months and are denominated in non-functional currencies, with currency forward contracts. Changes in the forecasted nonfunctional currency cash flows due to movements in exchange rates are substantially offset by changes in the fair value of the currency forward contracts designated as hedges. Market value gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized. Open foreign currency exchange forward contracts mature predominantly in the next twelve months. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had contracts with notional amounts of $5,870 million and $7,108 million respectively, to exchange foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar, Euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, Indian rupee, Mexican peso, Chinese renminbi, Hong Kong dollar, Czech koruna, Swiss franc, Singapore dollar, Romanian leu, Korean won, Swedish krona and Thai baht.

          Commodity Price Risk Management—Our exposure to market risk for commodity prices can result in changes in our cost of production. We primarily mitigate our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of long-term, fixed-price contracts with our suppliers and formula price agreements with suppliers and customers. We also enter into forward commodity contracts with third parties designated as hedges of anticipated purchases of several commodities. Forward commodity contracts are marked-to-market, with the resulting gains and losses recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had contracts with notional amounts of $32 million and $59 million, respectively, related to forward commodity agreements, principally base metals and natural gas.

          Interest Rate Risk Management—We use a combination of financial instruments, including long-term, medium-term and short-term financing, variable-rate commercial paper, and interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate mix of our total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges effectively changed $1,400 million of

16

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

fixed rate debt at an average rate of 4.09 percent to LIBOR based floating rate debt. Our interest rate swaps mature at various dates through 2021.

          Fair Value of Financial Instruments— The FASB’s accounting guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The FASB’s guidance classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or
	Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or
	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
Level 3	Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability

          The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets:
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	28	$	26
Available for sale investments		434		359
Interest rate swap agreements		149		134
Forward commodity contracts		1		1
Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	75	$	52
Forward commodity contracts		6		10

          The foreign currency exchange contracts, interest rate swap agreements, and forward commodity contracts are valued using broker quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within level 2. The Company holds investments in marketable equity securities that are designated as available for sale and are valued using quoted market prices. As such, these investments are classified within level 1. The Company also holds investments in commercial paper, certificates of deposits, and time deposits that are designated as available for sale and are valued using market transactions in over-the-counter markets. As such, these investments are classified within level 2.

          The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts and notes receivables, payables, commercial paper and short-term borrowings contained in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximates fair value. The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were not carried at fair value:

17

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	CarryingValue		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Assets
Long-term receivables	$	161	$	159	$	132	$	132
Liabilities
Long-term debt and related current maturities	$	6,962	$	8,107	$	6,896	$	7,896

          The Company determined the fair value of the long term receivables by discounting based upon the terms of the receivable and counterparty details including credit quality. As such, the fair value of these receivables is considered level 2. The Company determined the fair value of the long term debt and related current maturities utilizing transactions in the listed markets for identical or similar liabilities. As such, the fair value of the long-term debt and related current maturities is considered level 2 as well.

          At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had nonfinancial assets, specifically property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, with a net book value of $18 million and $262 million, respectively, which were accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets were tested for impairment and based on the fair value of these assets the Company recognized losses of $7 million and $18 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily in connection with our repositioning actions (see Note 4 Repositioning and Other Charges). The Company has determined that the fair value measurements of these nonfinancial assets are level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The Company utilizes the market, income or cost approaches or a combination of these valuation techniques for its non-recurring level 3 fair value measures. Inputs to such measures include observable market data obtained from independent sources such as broker quotes and recent market transactions for similar assets. It is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs in the measurement of fair value or non-recurring level 3 measurements. To the extent observable inputs are not available the Company utilizes unobservable inputs based upon the assumptions market participants would use in valuing the asset. Examples of utilized unobservable inputs are future cash flows, long term growth rates and applicable discount rates. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had nonfinancial assets, specifically property, plant and equipment, with a net book value of $15 million and $32 million, respectively, that were accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Based on the fair value of these assets the Company recognized losses of $2 million and $12 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company has determined that the fair value measurements of these nonfinancial assets are level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

          The derivatives utilized for risk management purposes as detailed above are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and impacted the Statement of Operations as follows:

18

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

Fair value of derivatives classified as assets consist of the following:

Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables	$	27	$	18
Interest rate swap agreements	Other assets		149		134
Commodity contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables		1		1
Not Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables	$	1	$	8
Fair value of derivatives classified as liabilities consist of the following:
Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accrued liabilities	$	69	$	50
Commodity contracts	Accrued liabilities		6		10
Not Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accrued liabilities	$	6	$	2

Gains (losses) recognized in OCI (effective portions) consist of the following:
	Three Months Ended June, 30						Six Months Ended June, 30
Designated Cash Flow Hedge	2012			2011			2012			2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	(50	)	$	8		$	(11	)	$	16
Commodity contracts		—			(1	)		(9	)		2

Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to income consist of the following:
Designated		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Hedge	Income Statement Location	2012			2011			2012			2011
	Product sales	$	(9	)	$	10		$	(6	)	$	16
Foreign currency	Cost of products sold		7			(11	)		10			(16	)
exchange contracts	Sales & general administrative		(3	)		4			3			6
Commodity contracts	Cost of products sold	$	(7	)	$	1		$	(13	)	$	—

19

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          Ineffective portions of commodity derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedge relationships were insignificant in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and are classified within cost of products sold. Foreign currency exchange contracts in cash flow hedge relationships qualify as critical matched terms hedge relationships and as a result have no ineffectiveness.

          Interest rate swap agreements are designated as hedge relationships with gains or losses on the derivative recognized in Interest and other financial charges offsetting the gains and losses on the underlying debt being hedged. Gains on interest rate swap agreements recognized in earnings were $29 and $15 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. Gains on interest rate swap agreements recognized in earnings were $24 million and $33 million in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Gains and losses are fully offset by losses and gains on the underlying debt being hedged.

          We also economically hedge our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates principally with forward contracts. These contracts are marked-to-market with the resulting gains and losses recognized in earnings offsetting the gains and losses on the non-functional currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities being hedged. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $61 million and $51 million of expense, respectively, in Other (Income) Expense. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $27 million and $50 million of income, respectively, in Other (Income) Expense.

Note 12. Noncontrolling Interest

Changes in noncontrolling interest consist of the following:
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Balance beginning of period, December 31	$	96			121
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		3			3
Acquisitions		—			(1	)
Dividends paid		(7	)		(10	)
Other owner changes		(2	)		(1	)
Balance end of period, June 30	$	90			112

          In the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, there were no increases or decreases to Honeywell additional paid in capital for purchases or sales of existing noncontrolling interests.

20

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

Note 13. Segment Financial Data

          Honeywell’s senior management evaluates segment performance based on segment profit. Segment profit is measured as business unit income (loss) before taxes excluding general corporate unallocated expense, other income (expense), interest and other financial charges, pension and other postretirement benefits (expense), stock compensation expense, repositioning and other charges and accounting changes.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net Sales
Aerospace
Products	$	1,750		$	1,559		$	3,455		$	3,025
Services		1,277			1,251			2,522			2,481
Total		3,027			2,810			5,977			5,506
Automation and Control Solutions
Products		3,407			3,331			6,658			6,467
Services		555			549			1,092			1,069
Total		3,962			3,880			7,750			7,536
Performance Materials and Technologies
Products		1,418			1,266			2,885			2,512
Services		128			140			276			249
Total		1,546			1,406			3,161			2,761
Transportation Systems
Products		900			990			1,854			1,955
Services		—			—			—			—
Total		900			990			1,854			1,955
Corporate
Products		—			—			—			—
Services		—			—			—			—
Total		—			—			—			—
	$	9,435		$	9,086		$	18,742		$	17,758
Segment Profit
Aerospace	$	562		$	451		$	1,096		$	918
Automation and Control Solutions		525			496			1,016			955
Performance Materials and Technologies		350			281			669			565
Transportation Systems		114			129			234			247
Corporate		(58	)		(56	)		(107	)		(124	)
Total Segment Profit		1,493			1,301			2,908			2,561
Other income(a)		9			8			14			28
Interest and other financial charges		(87	)		(96	)		(176	)		(195	)
Stock compensation expense(b)		(40	)		(42	)		(91	)		(91	)
Pension ongoing expense(b)		(9	)		(22	)		(22	)		(57	)
Other postretirement income/(expense)(b)		(9	)		45			(32	)		27
Repositioning and other charges (b)		(134	)		(94	)		(256	)		(227	)
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	1,223		$	1,100		$	2,345		$	2,046

(a) Equity income/(loss) of affiliated companies is included in Segment Profit.

(b) Amounts included in cost of products and services sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

21

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

Note 14. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

          Net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs for our significant defined benefit plans include the following components:

Pension Benefits
	U.S. Plans
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Service cost	$	64		$	53		$	128		$	116
Interest cost		185			191			369			381
Expected return on plan assets		(255	)		(254	)		(510	)		(507	)
Amortization of prior service cost		7			9			14			17
Settlements and curtailments		—			9			—			24
	$	1		$	8		$	1		$	31
	Non-U.S. Plans
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Service cost	$	12		$	15		$	24		$	30
Interest cost		55			60			110			120
Expected return on plan assets		(73	)		(72	)		(145	)		(143	)
Amortization of transition obligation		1			1			1			1
Amortization of prior service (credit)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)
Settlements and curtailments		—			1			2			1
	$	(6	)	$	4		$	(9	)	$	8
Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Service cost	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1
Interest cost		13			17			27			35
Amortization of prior service (credit)		(4	)		(9	)		(7	)		(22	)
Recognition of actuarial losses		5			6			16			18
Settlements and curtailments		(6	)		(61	)		(6	)		(61	)
	$	8		$	(47	)	$	30		$	(29	)

          Honeywell made cash contributions of $256 million and $267 million to our pension plans in the first and second quarter of 2012, respectively.

          If required, a mark to market adjustment will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 in accordance with our pension accounting method as described in Note 1 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contained in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

22

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental Matters

          We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign government requirements relating to the protection of the environment. We believe that, as a general matter, our policies, practices and procedures are properly designed to prevent unreasonable risk of environmental damage and personal injury and that our handling, manufacture, use and disposal of hazardous substances are in accordance with environmental and safety laws and regulations. However, mainly because of past operations and operations of predecessor companies, we, like other companies engaged in similar businesses, have incurred remedial response and voluntary cleanup costs for site contamination and are a party to lawsuits and claims associated with environmental and safety matters, including past production of products containing hazardous substances. Additional lawsuits, claims and costs involving environmental matters are likely to continue to arise in the future.

          With respect to environmental matters involving site contamination, we continually conduct studies, individually or jointly with other potentially responsible parties, to determine the feasibility of various remedial techniques. It is our policy to record appropriate liabilities for environmental matters when remedial efforts or damage claim payments are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are based on our best estimate of the undiscounted future costs required to complete the remedial work. The recorded liabilities are adjusted periodically as remediation efforts progress or as additional technical, regulatory or legal information becomes available. Given the uncertainties regarding the status of laws, regulations, enforcement policies, the impact of other potentially responsible parties, technology and information related to individual sites, we do not believe it is possible to develop an estimate of the range of reasonably possible environmental loss in excess of our recorded liabilities. We expect to fund expenditures for these matters from operating cash flow. The timing of cash expenditures depends on a number of factors, including the timing of remedial investigations and feasibility studies, the timing of litigation and settlements of remediation liability, personal injury and property damage claims, regulatory approval of cleanup projects, remedial techniques to be utilized and agreements with other parties.

          The following table summarizes information concerning our recorded liabilities for environmental costs:

December 31, 2011	$	723
Accruals for environmental matters deemed probable and reasonably estimable		128
Environmental liability payments		(136	)
June 30, 2012	$	715

          Environmental liabilities are included in the following balance sheet accounts:

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Accrued liabilities	$	302	$	303
Other liabilities		413		420
	$	715	$	723

          Although we do not currently possess sufficient information to reasonably estimate the amounts of liabilities to be recorded upon future completion of studies, litigation or settlements, and neither the timing nor the amount of the ultimate costs associated with environmental matters can be determined, they could be material to our consolidated results of operations or operating cash flows in the periods recognized or paid. However, considering our past experience and existing reserves, we do not expect that these environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.

23

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          New Jersey Chrome Sites—The excavation and offsite disposal of approximately one million tons of chromium residue present at a predecessor Honeywell site located in Jersey City, New Jersey, known as Study Area 7, was completed in January 2010. We are also implementing related groundwater remedial actions, and have received the appropriate permits from state and federal agencies for related river sediment work approved by the federal court. Provisions have been made in our financial statements for the estimated cost of these remedies.

          The above-referenced site is the most significant of the 21 sites located in Hudson County, New Jersey that are the subject of an Administrative Consent Order (ACO) entered into with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) in 1993 (the “Honeywell ACO Sites”). Remedial investigations and activities consistent with the ACO and other applicable settlement orders have been conducted and are underway at the other Honeywell ACO Sites. In addition, a settlement order was entered by the New Jersey State Superior Court in the third quarter of 2011 resolving litigation brought by the NJDEP against Honeywell and two other companies regarding the investigation and remediation of the remaining sites in the area that allegedly have chromium contamination (known as the Publicly Funded Sites). Under the settlement, Honeywell has accepted responsibility to remediate 24 of the 53 Publicly Funded Sites and will also bear 50 percent of the costs at another 10 Publicly Funded Sites. Honeywell is developing a schedule for the investigation and remediation of these Publicly Funded Sites. We have recorded reserves for the Honeywell ACO Sites and the applicable Publicly Funded Sites where appropriate under the accounting policy described above.

          Dundalk Marine Terminal, Baltimore, MD—Chrome residue from legacy chrome plant operations in Baltimore was deposited as fill at the Dundalk Marine Terminal (“DMT”), which is owned and operated by the Maryland Port Administration (“MPA”). Honeywell and the MPA have been sharing costs to investigate and mitigate related environmental issues, and have entered into a cost sharing agreement under which Honeywell will bear 77 percent of the costs of developing and implementing permanent remedies for the DMT facility. In January 2011, the MPA and Honeywell submitted to the Maryland Department of the Environment (“MDE”) a Corrective Measures Alternatives Analysis (“CMAA”) of certain potential remedies for DMT to assist MDE in selection of a final remedy, which has not yet occurred. We expect the MDE to select the final remedy in July 2012. Provision has been made in our financial statements for the CMAA consistent with the accounting policy described above. We have negotiated a Consent Decree with the MPA and MDE with respect to the investigation and remediation of the DMT facility. The Consent Decree is being challenged in federal court by BUILD, a Baltimore community group, together with a local church and two individuals (collectively “BUILD”). In October 2007, the Court dismissed with prejudice BUILD’s state law claims and dismissed without prejudice BUILD’s RCRA claims regarding neighborhoods near the DMT facility. In August 2008, the Court held a hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss BUILD’s remaining claims on the grounds that MDE is diligently prosecuting the investigation and remediation of the DMT. We are awaiting the Court’s decision. We do not believe that this matter will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position or operating cash flows. Given the scope and complexity of this project, it is possible that the cost of remediation, when determinable, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations in the periods recognized.

          Onondaga Lake, Syracuse, NY—We are implementing a combined dredging/capping remedy of Onondaga Lake pursuant to a consent decree approved by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in January 2007. We have accrued for our estimated cost of remediating Onondaga Lake based on currently available information and analysis performed by our engineering consultants. Honeywell is also conducting remedial investigations and activities at other sites in Syracuse. We have recorded reserves for these investigations and activities where appropriate under the accounting policy described above.

          Honeywell has entered into a cooperative agreement with potential natural resource trustees to assess alleged natural resource damages relating to this site. It is not possible to predict the outcome or duration of this assessment, or the amounts of, or responsibility for, any damages.

Asbestos Matters

          Like many other industrial companies, Honeywell is a defendant in personal injury actions related to asbestos. We did not mine or produce asbestos, nor did we make or sell insulation products or other construction materials that have been identified as the primary cause of asbestos related disease in the vast majority of claimants.

24

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          Honeywell’s predecessors owned North American Refractories Company (NARCO) from 1979 to 1986. NARCO produced refractory products (bricks and cement used in high temperature applications). We sold the NARCO business in 1986 and agreed to indemnify NARCO with respect to personal injury claims for products that had been discontinued prior to the sale (as defined in the sale agreement). NARCO retained all liability for all other claims. NARCO and/or Honeywell are defendants in asbestos personal injury cases asserting claims based upon alleged exposure to NARCO asbestos-containing products. Claimants consist largely of individuals who allege exposure to NARCO asbestos-containing refractory products in an occupational setting. These claims, and the filing of subsequent claims, have been stayed continuously since January 4, 2002, the date on which NARCO sought bankruptcy protection (see discussion below).

          Honeywell’s Bendix friction materials (Bendix) business manufactured automotive brake parts that contained chrysotile asbestos in an encapsulated form. Claimants consist largely of individuals who allege exposure to asbestos from brakes from either performing or being in the vicinity of individuals who performed brake replacements.

          The following tables summarize information concerning NARCO and Bendix asbestos related balances:

Asbestos Related Liabilities
	Bendix			NARCO			Total
December 31, 2011	$	613		$	1,123		$	1,736
Accrual for update to estimated liability		103			(1	)		102
Asbestos related liability payments		(76	)		(1	)		(77	)
June 30, 2012	$	640		$	1,121		$	1,761

Insurance Recoveries for Asbestos Related Liabilities
	Bendix			NARCO			Total
December 31, 2011	$	162		$	618		$	780
Probable insurance recoveries related to estimated liability		10			—			10
Insurance receivables settlements		5			8			13
Insurance receipts for asbestos related liabilities		(24	)		(36	)		(60	)
June 30, 2012	$	153		$	590		$	743

25

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          NARCO and Bendix asbestos related balances are included in the following balance sheet accounts:

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Other current assets	$	71	$	71
Insurance recoveries for asbestos related liabilities		672		709
	$	743	$	780
Accrued liabilities	$	239	$	237
Asbestos related liabilities		1,522		1,499
	$	1,761	$	1,736

          NARCO Products – On January 4, 2002, NARCO filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In connection with the filing of NARCO’s petition in 2002, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (“the Bankruptcy Court”) issued an injunction staying the prosecution of NARCO-related asbestos claims against the Company, which stay has continuously remained in place. In November 2007, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed NARCO’s Third Amended Plan of Reorganization (NARCO Plan of Reorganization). All challenges to the NARCO Plan of Reorganization were fully resolved in the third quarter of 2010. The NARCO Plan of Reorganization cannot become effective, however, until the Plan of Reorganization of certain NARCO affiliates, which is pending in Bankruptcy Court, is confirmed and then affirmed by the District Court. It is not possible to predict the timing or outcome of the Bankruptcy and District Court proceedings in the affiliates’ case. We expect that the stay enjoining litigation against NARCO and Honeywell will remain in effect until the effective date of the NARCO Plan of Reorganization.

          In connection with NARCO’s bankruptcy filing, we agreed to certain obligations which will be triggered upon the effective date of the NARCO Plan of Reorganization. Honeywell will provide NARCO with $20 million in financing and simultaneously forgive such indebtedness. We will also pay $40 million to NARCO’s former parent company and $16 million to certain asbestos claimants whose claims were resolved during the pendency of the NARCO bankruptcy proceedings. These amounts have been classified as Accrued Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2012.

          When the NARCO Plan of Reorganization becomes effective, in connection with its implementation, a federally authorized 524(g) trust (“NARCO Trust”) will be established for the evaluation and resolution of all existing and future NARCO asbestos claims. When the NARCO Trust is established, both Honeywell and NARCO will be entitled to a permanent channeling injunction barring all present and future individual actions in state or federal courts and requiring all asbestos related claims based on exposure to NARCO products to be made against the Trust. The NARCO Trust will review submitted claims and determine award amounts in accordance with established Trust Distribution Procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court which set forth all criteria claimants must meet to qualify for compensation including, among other things, exposure and medical criteria that determine the award amount.

          Once the NARCO Trust is established and operational, Honeywell will be obligated to fund NARCO asbestos claims submitted to the trust which qualify for payment under the Trust Distribution Procedures, subject to annual caps up to $150 million in any year, provided, however, that the first $100 million of claims processed through the NARCO Trust (the “Initial Claims Amount”) will not count against the first year annual cap and any unused portion of the Initial Claims Amount will roll over to subsequent years until fully utilized.

          Once the NARCO Trust is established and operational, Honeywell will also be responsible for the following funding obligations which are not subject to the annual cap described above: a) previously approved payments due to claimants pursuant to settlement agreements reached during the pendency of the NARCO

26

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

bankruptcy proceedings which provide that a portion of these settlements is to be paid by the NARCO Trust, which amounts are estimated at $130 million and are expected to be paid during the first year of trust operations and, b) payments due to claimants pursuant to settlement agreements reached during the pendency of the NARCO bankruptcy proceedings that provide for the right to submit claims to the NARCO Trust subject to qualification under the terms of the settlement agreements and Trust Distribution Procedures criteria, which amounts are estimated at $150 million and are expected to be paid during the first two years of trust operations.

          Our consolidated financial statements reflect an estimated liability for the amounts discussed above, unsettled claims pending as of the time NARCO filed for bankruptcy protection and for the estimated value of future NARCO asbestos claims expected to be asserted against the NARCO Trust through 2018. In light of the uncertainties inherent in making long-term projections and in connection with the initial operation of a 524(g) trust, as well as the stay of all NARCO asbestos claims since January 2002, we do not believe that we have a reasonable basis for estimating NARCO asbestos claims beyond 2018. In the absence of actual trust experience on which to base the estimate, Honeywell projected the probable value, including trust claim handling costs, of asbestos related future liabilities based on Company specific and general asbestos claims filing rates, expected rates of disease and anticipated claim values. Specifically, the valuation methodology included an analysis of the population likely to have been exposed to asbestos containing products, epidemiological studies estimating the number of people likely to develop asbestos related diseases, NARCO asbestos claims filing history, general asbestos claims filing rates in the tort system and in certain operating asbestos trusts, and the claims experience in those forums, the pending inventory of NARCO asbestos claims, disease criteria and payment values contained in the Trust Distribution Procedures and an estimated approval rate of claims submitted to the NARCO Trust. This methodology used to estimate the liability for future claims has been commonly accepted by numerous bankruptcy courts addressing 524(g) trusts and resulted in a range of estimated liability for future claims of $743 to $961 million. We believe that no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount and accordingly, we have recorded the minimum amount in the range.

          Our insurance receivable corresponding to the estimated liability for pending and future NARCO asbestos claims reflects coverage which reimburses Honeywell for portions of NARCO-related indemnity and defense costs and is provided by a large number of insurance policies written by dozens of insurance companies in both the domestic insurance market and the London excess market. At June 30, 2012, a significant portion of this coverage is with insurance companies with whom we have agreements to pay full policy limits. We conduct analyses to determine the amount of insurance that we estimate is probable of recovery in relation to payment of current and estimated future claims. While the substantial majority of our insurance carriers are solvent, some of our individual carriers are insolvent, which has been considered in our analysis of probable recoveries. We made judgments concerning insurance coverage that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our historical dealings with our insurers, our knowledge of any pertinent solvency issues surrounding insurers and various judicial determinations relevant to our insurance programs.

          In 2006, Travelers Casualty and Insurance Company (“Travelers”) filed a declaratory judgment action in the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York against Honeywell and other insurance carriers that provide coverage for NARCO asbestos claims, seeking a declaration regarding coverage obligations for NARCO asbestos claims under high excess insurance coverage issued by Travelers and the other insurance carriers. The other insurance carriers asserted cross claims against Honeywell seeking declarations regarding their coverage obligations for NARCO asbestos claims under high excess insurance coverage issued by them. Since then, the Company has entered into settlement agreements resolving all NARCO-related asbestos coverage issues with certain of these insurance carriers, including Travelers. Approximately $48 million of remaining unsettled coverage is included in our NARCO-related insurance receivable at June 30, 2012. Honeywell believes it is entitled to the coverage at issue and expects to prevail in this matter. In 2007, Honeywell prevailed on a critical choice of law issue concerning the appropriate method of allocating NARCO-related asbestos liabilities to triggered policies. The plaintiffs appealed and the trial court’s ruling was upheld by the intermediate appellate court in 2009. Plaintiffs’ further appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in New York, was denied in October 2009. A related New Jersey action brought by Honeywell has been dismissed, but all coverage claims against plaintiffs have been preserved in the New York action. Based upon (i) our understanding of relevant facts and applicable law, (ii) the terms of insurance policies at issue, (iii) our experience on matters of this nature, and (iv) the advice of counsel, we believe that the amount due from the remaining insurance carriers is probable of recovery. While Honeywell expects to prevail in this matter, an adverse outcome could have a

27

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

material impact on our results of operations in the period recognized but would not be material to our consolidated financial position or operating cash flows.

          Projecting future events is subject to many uncertainties that could cause the NARCO related asbestos liabilities or assets to be higher or lower than those projected and recorded. There is no assurance that the plan of reorganization will become final, that insurance recoveries will be timely or whether there will be any NARCO related asbestos claims beyond 2018. Given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future events, we review our estimates periodically, and update them based on our experience and other relevant factors. Similarly, we will reevaluate our projections concerning our probable insurance recoveries in light of any changes to the projected liability or other developments that may impact insurance recoveries.

          Friction Products—The following tables present information regarding Bendix related asbestos claims activity:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012			Year Ended December 31,
Claims Activity				2011			2010
Claims Unresolved at the beginning of period		22,571			22,480			19,940
Claims Filed during the period (a)		1,731			3,592			4,302
Claims Resolved during the period(b)		(1,433	)		(3,501	)		(1,762	)
Claims Unresolved at the end of period		22,869			22,571			22,480

(a) The number of claims filed in 2010 includes approximately 1,541 non-malignant claims (with an accrued liability of approximately $575 thousand in the aggregate), a majority of which had previously been dismissed in Mississippi and re-filed in Arkansas.

(b) The number of claims resolved in 2011 includes approximately 351 claims previously classified as inactive (82% non-malignant and accrued liability of approximately $1.7 million) which were activated during 2011. The number of claims resolved in 2010 includes approximately 1,300 claims previously classified as inactive (95% non-malignant and accrued liability of approximately $2.0 million) which were activated during 2010.

	June 30,		December 31,
Disease Distribution of Unresolved Claims	2012		2011		2010
Mesothelioma and Other Cancer Claims		5,334		4,943		4,856
Nonmalignant Claims		17,535		17,628		17,624
Total Claims		22,869		22,571		22,480

          Honeywell has experienced average resolution values per claim excluding legal costs as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
	(in whole dollars)
Malignant claims	$	48,000	$	54,000	$	50,000	$	65,000	$	33,000
Nonmalignant claims	$	1,000	$	1,300	$	200	$	1,500	$	500

          It is not possible to predict whether resolution values for Bendix related asbestos claims will increase, decrease or stabilize in the future.

28

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          Our consolidated financial statements reflect an estimated liability for resolution of pending (claims actually filed as of the financial statement date) and future Bendix related asbestos claims. We have valued Bendix pending and future claims using average resolution values for the previous five years. We update the resolution values used to estimate the cost of Bendix pending and future claims during the fourth quarter each year.

          The liability for future claims represents the estimated value of future asbestos related bodily injury claims expected to be asserted against Bendix over the next five years. Such estimated cost of future Bendix related asbestos claims is based on historic claims filing experience and dismissal rates, disease classifications, and resolution values in the tort system for the previous five years. In light of the uncertainties inherent in making long-term projections, as well as certain factors unique to friction product asbestos claims, we do not believe that we have a reasonable basis for estimating asbestos claims beyond the next five years. The methodology used to estimate the liability for future claims is similar to that used to estimate the future NARCO related asbestos claims liability.

          Our insurance receivable corresponding to the liability for settlement of pending and future Bendix asbestos claims reflects coverage which is provided by a large number of insurance policies written by dozens of insurance companies in both the domestic insurance market and the London excess market. Based on our ongoing analysis of the probable insurance recovery, insurance receivables are recorded in the financial statements simultaneous with the recording of the estimated liability for the underlying asbestos claims. This determination is based on our analysis of the underlying insurance policies, our historical experience with our insurers, our ongoing review of the solvency of our insurers, our interpretation of judicial determinations relevant to our insurance programs, and our consideration of the impacts of any settlements reached with our insurers. Insurance receivables are also recorded when structured insurance settlements provide for future fixed payment streams that are not contingent upon future claims or other events. Such amounts are recorded at the net present value of the fixed payment stream.

          On a cumulative historical basis, Honeywell has recorded insurance receivables equal to approximately 40 percent of the value of the underlying asbestos claims recorded. However, because there are gaps in our coverage due to insurance company insolvencies, certain uninsured periods, and insurance settlements, this rate is expected to decline for any future Bendix related asbestos liabilities that may be recorded. Future recoverability rates may also be impacted by numerous other factors, such as future insurance settlements, insolvencies and judicial determinations relevant to our coverage program, which are difficult to predict. Assuming continued defense and indemnity spending at current levels, we estimate that the cumulative recoverability rate could decline over the next five years to approximately 33 percent.

          Honeywell believes it has sufficient insurance coverage and reserves to cover all pending Bendix related asbestos claims and Bendix related asbestos claims estimated to be filed within the next five years. Although it is impossible to predict the outcome of either pending or future Bendix related asbestos claims, we do not believe that such claims would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position in light of our insurance coverage and our prior experience in resolving such claims. If the rate and types of claims filed, the average resolution value of such claims and the period of time over which claim settlements are paid (collectively, the “Variable Claims Factors”) do not substantially change, Honeywell would not expect future Bendix related asbestos claims to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or operating cash flows in any fiscal year. No assurances can be given, however, that the Variable Claims Factors will not change.

Other Matters

          We are subject to a number of other lawsuits, investigations and disputes (some of which involve substantial amounts claimed) arising out of the conduct of our business, including matters relating to commercial transactions, government contracts, product liability, prior acquisitions and divestitures, employee benefit plans, intellectual property, and environmental, health and safety matters. We recognize a liability for any contingency that is probable of occurrence and reasonably estimable. We continually assess the likelihood of adverse judgments of outcomes in these matters, as well as potential ranges of possible losses (taking into consideration any insurance recoveries), based on a careful analysis of each matter with the assistance of outside legal counsel and, if applicable, other experts. Included in these other matters are the following:

29

Honeywell International Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

          Allen, et al. v. Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan—Pursuant to a settlement approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona in February 2008, 18 of 21 claims alleged by plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit were dismissed with prejudice in exchange for approximately $35 million (paid from the Company’s pension plan) and the maximum aggregate liability for the remaining three claims (alleging that Honeywell impermissibly reduced the pension benefits of certain employees of a predecessor entity when the plan was amended in 1983 and failed to calculate benefits in accordance with the terms of the plan) was capped at $500 million. In October 2009, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan with respect to the claim regarding the calculation of benefits. In May 2011, the parties engaged in mediation and reached an agreement in principle to settle the three remaining claims for $23.8 million (also to be paid from the Company’s pension plan). Settlement documents have been submitted to the court for classwide approval. A preliminary settlement order has been approved by the court and a fairness hearing on the settlement is scheduled for July 20, 2012. Upon court approval of the settlement, all claims in this matter will be fully resolved.

          Quick Lube—On March 31, 2008, S&E Quick Lube, a filter distributor, filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging that twelve filter manufacturers, including Honeywell, engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices, rig bids and allocate U.S. customers for aftermarket automotive filters. This suit is a purported class action on behalf of direct purchasers of filters from the defendants. Parallel purported class actions, including on behalf of indirect purchasers of filters, have been filed by other plaintiffs in a variety of jurisdictions in the United States and Canada. The U.S cases have been consolidated into a single multi-district litigation in the Northern District of Illinois. In June 2011, plaintiff’s principal witness pled guilty to a felony count of having made false statements to federal investigators. On March 8, 2012, Honeywell entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the multi-district litigation class action as to all plaintiffs, subject to approval by the court. The settlement did not and will not have a material impact on our results of operations or operating cash flows in the periods recognized or paid. As previously reported, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice notified Honeywell in January 2010 that it had officially closed its investigation into possible collusion in the replacement auto filters industry.

          Honeywell v. United Auto Workers (“UAW”) et. al—In July 2011, Honeywell filed an action in federal court (District of New Jersey) against the UAW and all former employees who retired under a series of Master Collective Bargaining Agreements (“MCBAs”) between Honeywell and the UAW. The Company is seeking a declaratory judgment that certain express limitations on its obligation to contribute toward the healthcare coverage of such retirees (the “CAPS”) set forth in the MCBAs may be implemented, effective January 1, 2012. In September 2011, the UAW and certain retiree defendants filed a motion to dismiss the New Jersey action and filed suit in the Eastern District of Michigan alleging that the MCBAs do not provide for CAPS on the Company’s liability for healthcare coverage. The UAW and retiree plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion for class certification and a motion for partial summary judgment in the Michigan action, seeking a ruling that retirees who retired prior to the initial inclusion of the CAPS in the 2003 MCBA are not covered by the CAPS as a matter of law. In December 2011, the New Jersey action was dismissed on forum grounds. Honeywell has appealed the New Jersey court’s dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In the meantime, Honeywell has answered the UAW’s complaint in Michigan and has asserted a counterclaim for fraudulent inducement. Honeywell is confident that the CAPS will be upheld and that its liability for healthcare coverage premiums with respect to the putative class will be limited as negotiated and expressly set forth in the applicable MCBAs. In the event of an adverse ruling, however, Honeywell’s other postretirement benefits for pre-2003 retirees would increase by approximately $150 million, reflecting the estimated value of these CAPS.

          Given the uncertainty inherent in litigation and investigations (including the specific matters referenced above), we do not believe it is possible to develop estimates of reasonably possible loss in excess of current accruals for these matters (other than as specifically set forth above). Considering our past experience and existing accruals, we do not expect the outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position. Because most contingencies are resolved over long periods of time, potential liabilities are subject to change due to new developments, changes in settlement strategy or the impact of evidentiary requirements, which could cause us to pay damage awards or settlements (or become subject to equitable remedies) that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or operating cash flows in the periods recognized or paid.

30

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareowners
of Honeywell International Inc.:

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Honeywell International Inc. and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of shareowners’ equity, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 17, 2012, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2011, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey

July 18, 2012

The “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” included above is not a “report” or “part of a Registration Statement” prepared or certified by an independent accountant within the meanings of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, and the accountants’ Section 11 liability does not extend to such report.

31

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
	(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

The following MD&A is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and financial condition of Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The financial information as of June 30, 2012 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contained in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

The Consumer Products Group business had historically been part of the Transportation Systems reportable segment. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for the disposal of long-lived assets, the results of our Consumer Products Group business are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations and from segment results for all periods presented. See Note 3 Acquisitions and Divestitures for further details.

A. Results of Operations – three and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the three and six months ended June 30, 2011

Net Sales
	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011		2012			2011
Net sales	$	9,435		$	9,086	$	18,742		$	17,758
% change compared with prior period		4	%				6	%

The change in net sales compared to the prior year period is attributable to the following:

	Three Months			Year to Date
Volume		3	%		4	%
Price		—			1	%
Foreign Exchange		(3	)%		(2	)%
Acquisitions/Divestitures		3	%		3	%
Other		1	%		—
		4	%		6	%

A discussion of net sales by segment can be found in the Review of Business Segments section of this MD&A.

Cost of Products and Services Sold
	Three Months Ended June, 30						Six Months Ended June, 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Cost of products and services sold	$	6,922		$	6,664		$	13,802		$	13,088
% change compared with prior period		4	%					5	%
Gross Margin percentage		26.6	%		26.7	%		26.4	%		26.3	%

          Cost of products and services sold increased by $258 million or 4 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 principally due to an estimated increase in direct material costs of approximately $220 million driven substantially by a 4 percent increase in sales as a result of the factors (excluding price) discussed above and in the Review of Business Segments section of this MD&A, an increase in repositioning and other charges of approximately $50 million and an increase in other postretirement expense of approximately $45 million.

          Cost of products and services sold increased by $714 million or 5 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 principally due to an estimated increase in direct

32

material costs of approximately $720 million driven substantially by a 6 percent increase in sales as a result of the factors (excluding price) discussed above and in the Review of Business Segments section of this MD&A, an increase in other postretirement expense of approximately $50 million and an increase in repositioning and other charges of approximately $45 million.

          Gross margin percentage decreased by 0.1 percentage point in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to higher repositioning and other charges (approximately 0.5 percentage point impact), higher other postretirement expense (approximately 0.4 percentage point impact) and lower segment gross margin in our Automation and Control Solutions and Transportation Systems segments (approximately 0.4 percentage point impact collectively) partially offset by higher segment margin in our Aerospace and Performance Materials and Technologies segments (approximately 1.2 percentage point impact collectively).

          Gross margin percentage increased by 0.1 percentage point in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to higher segment gross margin in our Aerospace and Performance Materials and Technologies segments (approximately 0.7 percentage point impact collectively) partially offset by higher repositioning and other charges (approximately 0.3 percentage point impact) lower segment gross margin in our Automation and Control Solutions and Transportation Systems segments (approximately 0.2 percentage point impact collectively) and higher other postretirement expense (approximately 0.1 percentage point impact).

          For further discussion of segment results see “Review of Business Segments”.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	1,226		$	1,248		$	2,457		$	2,480
Percent of sales		13.0	%		13.7	%		13.1	%		14.0	%

          Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) decreased as a percentage of sales by 0.7 percentage points in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2011 driven by the impact of higher sales volumes as a result of the factors discussed in the Review of Business Segments section of this MD&A and foreign exchange, partially offset by the impact of an estimated $50 million increase in costs resulting from acquisitions and merit increases.

          SG&A decreased as a percentage of sales by 0.9 percentage points in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 driven by the impact of higher sales volumes as a result of the factors discussed in the Review of Business Segments section of this MD&A and foreign exchange, partially offset by an estimated $90 million in costs resulting from acquisitions and merit increases.

33

Other (Income) Expense

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Equity (income)/loss of affiliated companies	$	(14	)	$	(14	)	$	(24	)	$	(23	)
Loss/(gain) on sale of non-strategic businesses and assets		1			(2	)		1			(46	)
Interest income		(14	)		(14	)		(28	)		(27	)
Foreign exchange		3			10			13			18
Other, net		1			(2	)		—			27
	$	(23	)	$	(22	)	$	(38	)	$	(51	)

          Other income of $38 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased compared to other income of $51 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 due primarily to a $41 million pre-tax gain related to the divestiture of the automotive on-board sensor products business within our Automation and Control Solutions segment in the first quarter of 2011, partially offset by a loss of $29 million resulting from early redemption of debt in 2011.

Interest and Other Financial Charges

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011		2012			2011
Interest and other financial charges	$	87		$	96	$	176		$	195
% change compared with prior period		(9	)%				(10	)%

          Interest and other financial charges decreased by $9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and by $19 million in the six months ended 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to lower borrowing costs, partially offset by higher debt balances.

Tax Expense

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Tax expense	$	318		$	304		$	615		$	560
Effective tax rate		26.0	%		27.6	%		26.2	%		27.4	%

          The effective tax rate decreased by 1.6 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and 1.2 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to lower tax expense related to divestitures, tax reserves and changes in tax legislation.

          The effective tax rate for the periods ending in 2012 was lower than the statutory rate of 35 percent due, in part, to foreign earnings taxed at lower tax rates and benefits from the domestic manufacturing deduction.

          The effective tax rate for the periods ending in 2011 was lower than the statutory rate of 35 percent due, in part, to foreign earnings taxed at lower tax rates and benefits from domestic manufacturing deduction and U.S. tax credits.

34

Net Income Attributable to Honeywell

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income attributable to Honeywell
Income from continuing operations less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	902	$	796	$	1,725	$	1,483
Income from discontinued operations		—		14		—		32
Net income attributable to Honeywell		902		810		1,725		1,515
Earnings per share of common stock – assuming dilution
Income from continuing operations		1.14		1.00		2.19		1.86
Income from discontinued operations		—		0.02		—		0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.14	$	1.02	$	2.19	$	1.90

          Earnings per share of common stock – assuming dilution increased by $0.12 per share in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to increased segment profit in our Aerospace, Performance Materials and Technologies, and Automation and Control Solutions segments and lower pension expense, partially offset by higher other postretirement expense and repositioning and other charges, and decreased income from discontinued operations.

          Earnings per share of common stock – assuming dilution increased by $0.29 per share in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to increased segment profit in our Aerospace, Performance Materials and Technologies, and Automation and Control Solutions segments and lower pension expense, partially offset by higher other postretirement expense and repositioning and other charges, and decreased income from discontinued operations.

35

Review of Business Segments

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net Sales
Aerospace
Products	$	1,750		$	1,559		$	3,455		$	3,025
Services		1,277			1,251			2,522			2,481
Total		3,027			2,810			5,977			5,506
Automation and Control Solutions
Products		3,407			3,331			6,658			6,467
Services		555			549			1,092			1,069
Total		3,962			3,880			7,750			7,536
Performance Materials and Technologies
Products		1,418			1,266			2,885			2,512
Services		128			140			276			249
Total		1,546			1,406			3,161			2,761
Transportation Systems
Products		900			990			1,854			1,955
Services		—			—			—			—
Total		900			990			1,854			1,955
Corporate
Products		—			—			—			—
Services		—			—			—			—
Total		—			—			—			—
	$	9,435		$	9,086		$	18,742		$	17,758
Segment Profit
Aerospace	$	562		$	451		$	1,096		$	918
Automation and Control Solutions		525			496			1,016			955
Performance Materials and Technologies		350			281			669			565
Transportation Systems		114			129			234			247
Corporate		(58	)		(56	)		(107	)		(124	)
Total Segment Profit		1,493			1,301			2,908			2,561
Other income(a)		9			8			14			28
Interest and other financial charges		(87	)		(96	)		(176	)		(195	)
Stock compensation expense(b)		(40	)		(42	)		(91	)		(91	)
Pension ongoing expense(b)		(9	)		(22	)		(22	)		(57	)
Other postretirement income/(expense)(b)		(9	)		45			(32	)		27
Repositioning and other charges (b)		(134	)		(94	)		(256	)		(227	)
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	1,223		$	1,100		$	2,345		$	2,046

(a)	Equity income/(loss) of affiliated companies is included in Segment Profit.
(b)	Amounts included in cost of products and services sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

36

	Three Months Ended June 30,				% change			Six Months Ended June 30,				% change
	2012		2011					2012		2011
Aerospace Sales
Commercial:
Original Equipment
Air transport and regional	$	407	$	363		12	%	$	822	$	732		12	%
Business and general aviation		236		102		131	%		492		283		74	%
Aftermarket
Air transport and regional		725		694		4	%		1,453		1,352		7	%
Business and general aviation		356		299		19	%		703		565		24	%
Defense and Space		1,303		1,352		(4	)%		2,507		2,574		(3	)%
Total Aerospace Sales		3,027		2,810					5,977		5,506
Automation and Control Solutions Sales
Energy Safety & Security		2,022		1,982		2	%		3,994		3,921		2	%
Process Solutions		768		753		2	%		1,490		1,423		5	%
Building Solutions & Distribution		1,172		1,145		2	%		2,266		2,192		3	%
Total Automation and Control Solution Sales		3,962		3,880					7,750		7,536
Performance Materials and Technologies
UOP		508		460		10	%		1,087		874		24	%
Advanced Materials		1,038		946		10	%		2,074		1,887		10	%
Total Performance Materials and Technologies Sales		1,546		1,406					3,161		2,761
Transportation Systems Sales
Transportation Systems		900		990		(9	)%		1,854		1,955		(5	)%
Total Transportation Systems Sales		900		990					1,854		1,955
Net Sales	$	9,435	$	9,086				$	18,742	$	17,758

Aerospace

	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change			2012		2011		% Change
Net sales	$	3,027	$	2,810		8	%	$	5,977	$	5,506		9	%
Cost of products and services sold		2,266		2,170					4,481		4,204
Selling, general and administrative expenses		153		138					313		282
Other		46		51					87		102
Segment profit	$	562	$	451		25	%	$	1,096	$	918		19	%

37

	2012 vs. 2011
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Factors Contributing to Year-Over-Year Change	Sales			Segment Profit			Sales			Segment Profit
Organic growth/ Operational segment profit		4	%		7	%		6	%		10	%
Acquisitions and divestitures, net		1	%		1	%		2	%		1	%
Other		3	%		17	%		1	%		8	%
Total % Change		8	%		25	%		9	%		19	%

Aerospace sales by major customer end-markets were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	% of Aerospace						% Increase/ (Decrease) in Sales			% of Aerospace						% Increase/ (Decrease) in Sales
	Sales									Sales
Customer End-Markets	2012			2011						2012			2011
Commercial original equipment
Air transport and regional		13	%		13	%		12	%		14	%		13	%		12	%
Business and general aviation		8	%		4	%		131	%		8	%		5	%		74	%
Commercial original equipment		21	%		17	%		38	%		22	%		18	%		29	%
Commercial aftermarket
Air transport and regional		24	%		24	%		4	%		24	%		25	%		7	%
Business and general aviation		12	%		11	%		19	%		12	%		10	%		24	%
Commercial aftermarket		36	%		35	%		9	%		36	%		35	%		12	%
Defense and Space		43	%		48	%		(4	)%		42	%		47	%		(3	)%
Total		100	%		100	%		8	%		100	%		100	%		9	%

          Aerospace sales increased by 8 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 due to a 4 percent increase in organic growth primarily due to increased commercial original equipment (OE) and aftermarket sales, and a 3 percent increase in revenue related to a $75 million reduction in payments to business and general aviation OE manufacturers to partially offset their pre-production costs associated with new aircraft platforms (OEM payments), and a 1 percent growth from acquisitions, net of divestitures.

          Aerospace sales increased by 9 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 due principally to a 6 percent increase in organic growth due to increased commercial sales volume, a 2 percent growth from acquisitions, net of divestitures, and a 1 percent increase in revenue as a result of a reduction in OEM payments, discussed above.

          Details regarding the changes in sales by customer end-markets are as follows:

Commercial OE sales increased by 38 percent (16 percent organic) and increased by 29 percent (17 percent organic) in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively, due to the following:
•	Air transport and regional OE sales increased by 12 percent (11 percent organic) in both the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, driven by higher sales to our OE customers, consistent with higher production rates, and a favorable platform mix.
•	Business and general aviation OE sales increased by 131 percent (25 percent organic) in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and increased by 74 percent (29 percent organic) in the six months ended June

38

	30, 2012 driven by the favorable 73 percent and 26 percent impact of the OEM payments discussed above, for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2012, respectively, in addition to strong demand in the business jet end-market, favorable platform mix, and growth from acquisitions.
Commercial aftermarket sales increased by 9 percent and 12 percent in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively, due to the following:
•	Air transport and regional aftermarket sales increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 by 4 and 7 percent respectively, primarily as a result of (i) increased sales of spare parts and higher maintenance activity driven by an approximate 2 percent and 3 percent increase in global flying hours for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively, (ii) increased sales of avionics upgrades, and (iii) changes in customer buying patterns relating to maintenance activity. We expect sales growth rates to moderate in the second half of 2012 as sales begin to recouple with flying hours growth.
•	Business and general aviation aftermarket sales increased by 19 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and 24 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to increased sales of spare parts and revenue associated with maintenance service agreements and a higher penetration in retrofit, modifications, and upgrades.
Defense and space sales decreased by 4 percent (negative 5 percent organic) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 and decreased by 3 percent (negative 4 percent organic) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to anticipated program ramp downs, partially offset by international aftermarket sales and growth from acquisitions, net of divestitures.

          Aerospace segment profit increased by 25 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with quarter ended June 30, 2011 due to a 17 percent favorable impact from lower OEM payments, discussed above, a 7 percent increase in operational segment profit, and a 1 percent increase from acquisitions, net of divestitures. The increase in operational segment profit is driven by the favorable impact from higher commercial demand, price and productivity, net of inflation, partially offset by increased research, development and engineering investments. Cost of goods sold totaled $2.3 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $96 million primarily due to the factors discussed above.

          Aerospace segment profit increased by 19 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to an increase in operational segment profit comprised of an approximate 10 percent favorable impact from higher sales volume, a 8 percent positive impact from the OEM payments, discussed above, and a 1 percent increase from acquisitions, net of divestitures. The increase in operational segment profit is due to higher commercial demand, higher price and productivity, net of inflation, partially offset by increased research, development and engineering investments. Cost of goods sold totaled $4.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of approximately $277 million primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Automation and Control Solutions

	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change			2012		2011		% Change
Net sales	$	3,962	$	3,880		2	%	$	7,750	$	7,536		3	%
Cost of products and services sold		2,701		2,612					5,244		5,070
Selling, general and administrative expenses		680		723					1,396		1,411
Other		56		49					94		100
Segment profit	$	525	$	496		6	%	$	1,016	$	955		6	%

39

	2012 vs. 2011
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Factors Contributing to Year-Over-Year Change	Sales			Segment Profit			Sales			Segment Profit
Organic growth/ Operational segment profit		4	%		7	%		3	%		7	%
Foreign exchange		(4	)%		(4	)%		(2	)%		(3	)%
Acquisitions and divestitures, net		2	%		3	%		2	%		2	%
Total % Change		2	%		6	%		3	%		6	%

          Automation and Control Solutions (“ACS”) sales increased by 2 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to a 4 percent increase in organic revenue driven by increased sales volume and 2 percent growth from acquisitions, net of divestitures partially offset by the negative impact of foreign exchange.

          ACS sales increased by 3 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to a 3 percent increase in organic revenue driven by increased sales volume and 2 percent growth from acquisitions, net of divestitures, partially offset by the negative impact of foreign exchange.

• Sales in our Energy, Safety & Security businesses increased by 2 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2012 (1 percent organic) and 2 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 (flat organic) principally due to (i) the positive impact of acquisitions (most significantly EMS and Kings), net of divestitures, (ii) higher sales volumes due to improving U.S. residential market conditions and new product introductions in the security business and (iii) higher sales volumes due to contract wins and new product introductions in the scanning and mobility business, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange, lower sales volumes in Europe, decreases in sales volumes of our environmental and combustion controls products in the first quarter (primarily the result of residential HVAC softness due to the mild winter) and decreases in sales volumes of our personal protective equipment in the second quarter (primarily the result of European economic conditions).

• Sales in our Process Solutions business increased by 2 percent (8 percent organic) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 5 percent (8 percent organic) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 principally due to increased volume reflecting conversion to sales from backlog, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange.

• Sales in our Building Solutions & Distribution businesses increased by 2 percent (6 percent organic) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 3 percent (5 percent organic) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 principally due to increased sales volume in our Americas Distribution business and volume growth in our Building Solutions business reflecting conversion to sales from backlog, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange.

          ACS segment profit increased by 6 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 due to a 7 percent increase in operational segment profit, and a 3 percent increase from acquisitions net of divestitures partially offset by a 4 percent negative impact of foreign exchange. The increase in operational segment profit is primarily the result of positive impact from productivity, net of inflation. Cost of goods sold totaled $2.7 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $89 million which is primarily due to higher sales volumes, acquisitions, net of divestitures and inflation, partially offset by positive impact from foreign exchange and productivity.

          ACS segment profit increased by 6 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to a 7 percent increase in operational segment profit, 2 percent increase from acquisitions net of divestitures partially offset by a 3 percent negative impact of foreign exchange. The increase in operational segment profit is primarily the result of positive impact from productivity, net of inflation. Cost of goods sold totaled $5.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $174 million which is

40

primarily due to higher sales volumes, acquisitions, net of divestitures and inflation, partially offset by positive impact from foreign exchange and productivity.

Performance Materials and Technologies

	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		Change			2012		2011		Change
Net sales	$	1,546	$	1,406		10	%	$	3,161	$	2,761		14	%
Cost of products and services sold		1,079		1,014					2,256		1,974
Selling, general and administrative expenses		101		101					213		198
Other		16		10					23		24
Segment profit	$	350	$	281		25	%	$	669	$	565		18	%

	2012 vs. 2011
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Factors Contributing to Year-Over-Year Change	Sales			Segment Profit			Sales			Segment Profit
Organic growth/ Operational segment profit		4	%		22	%		8	%		16	%
Foreign exchange		(1	)%		(1	)%		(1	)%		(1	)%
Acquisitions and divestitures, net		7	%		4	%		7	%		3	%
Total % Change		10	%		25	%		14	%		18	%

          Performance Materials and Technologies sales increased by 10 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 due to a 4 percent increase in organic growth driven primarily by increased sales volumes and 7 percent growth from acquisitions, partially offset by a 1 percent unfavorable impact from foreign exchange. Performance Materials and Technologies sales increased by 14 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to an 8 percent increase in organic growth driven primarily by increased sales volumes and 7 percent growth from acquisitions, partially offset by a 1 percent unfavorable impact from foreign exchange.

•	UOP sales increased by 10 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 driven primarily by increased licensing, equipment, and service revenues, reflecting continued strength in the refining and petrochemical industries, partially offset by decreased catalyst volumes primarily due to timing of deliveries.
•	UOP sales increased by 24 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 driven primarily by higher volume of petrochemical and refining catalysts, increased licensing, equipment, and service revenues, reflecting continued strength in the refining and petrochemical industries. UOP sales growth is expected to moderate through the second half of 2012 compared to the second half of 2011 due to timing of project completion and higher than typical volumes of refining catalysts in the second half of 2011.
•	Advanced Materials sales increased by 10 percent (flat organic) in both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012, compared with the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011 driven by a 44 percent and 43 percent increase in Resins and Chemicals sales for the three and six month periods, respectively, primarily due to the phenol plant acquisition and increased sales volumes, partially offset by lower sales in Fluorine Products primarily due to unfavorable pricing reflecting more challenging global end market conditions and in Specialty Products primarily due to slowing end market demand.
	In July 2012, the Company announced that it is evaluating a series of upgrades to its Metropolis Works nuclear conversion facility, a Fluorine Products facility, following a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

41

(NRC) inspection that focused on preparedness for extreme natural disasters such as strong earthquakes and tornados. The NRC inspection was part of a comprehensive assessment of all U.S. nuclear-related facilities following the Fukushima, Japan earthquake in 2011. Production at the Metropolis facility (which has been undergoing planned annual maintenance) will not be restarted until agreement is reached with the NRC on the necessary upgrade projects and timing. Completion of the upgrades to the facility could take approximately 12 to 15 months. The timeline for the restarting of operations at the facility and the timing and nature of the upgrades has not been determined and will be addressed in discussions with the NRC. The continued suspension of operations and the cost of the plant upgrades are not expected to have a material negative impact on Performance Materials and Technologies 2012 results of operations.

          Performance Materials and Technologies segment profit increased by 25 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 due to a 22 percent increase in operational segment profit, and a 4 percent increase from acquisitions, partially offset by an unfavorable impact of 1 percent in foreign exchange. The increase in operational segment profit is primarily due to higher licensing and service revenues in UOP, increased volume in Resins and Chemicals, and productivity, partially offset by continued investment to support growth and unfavorable pricing in Fluorine Products primarily due to more challenging global end market conditions. Cost of products and services sold totaled $1.1 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $65 million which is primarily due to the phenol plant acquisition, higher volume and continued investment in growth initiatives, partially offset by productivity and lower material costs.

          Segment profit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 18 percent compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to increased operational segment profit of 16 percent and a 3 percent increase from acquisitions, partially offset by an unfavorable impact of 1 percent in foreign exchange. The increase in operational segment profit is primarily due to increased volume in Resins and Chemicals, and higher licensing and service revenues in UOP and productivity (net of continued investment in growth initiatives) partially offset by unfavorable price to raw materials spread. Cost of goods sold totaled $2.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $282 million which is primarily due to the phenol plant acquisition, higher volume, and continued investment in growth initiatives.

Transportation Systems

	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		Change			2012		2011		Change
Net sales	$	900	$	990		(9	)%	$	1,854	$	1,955		(5	)%
Cost of products and services sold		737		807					1,536		1,608
Selling, general and administrative expenses		41		44					77		83
Other		8		10					7		17
Segment profit	$	114	$	129		(12	)%	$	234	$	247		(5	)%

	2012 vs. 2011
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Factors Contributing to Year-Over-Year Change	Sales			Segment Profit			Sales			Segment Profit
Organic growth/ Operational segment profit		(1	)%		(1	)%		0	%		2	%
Foreign exchange		(8	)%		(11	)%		(5	)%		(7	)%
Total % Change		(9	%)		(12	%)		(5	%)		(5	%)

42

          Transportation Systems sales decreased by 9 percent and 5 percent, respectively, in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to prior periods primarily due to the negative impact of foreign exchange. For each period, decreased light vehicle production in Europe and lower aftermarket sales were substantially offset by new platform launches (including higher turbo gas penetration in North America).

          Transportation Systems segment profit decreased by 12 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2011 due to an 11 percent negative impact from foreign exchange and 1 percent decrease in operational segment profit. The decrease in operational segment profit is primarily due to the negative impact from price and inflation, partially offset by productivity (net of the impact of ongoing projects to drive operational improvement in the Friction Materials business). Cost of goods sold totaled $737 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $70 million primarily due to foreign exchange and productivity.

          Transportation Systems segment profit decreased by 5 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to a 7 percent negative impact from foreign exchange and 2 percent increase in operational segment profit. The increase in operational segment profit is primarily due to the positive impact of productivity (net of the impact of ongoing projects to drive operational improvement in the Friction Materials business) partially offset by price and inflation. Cost of goods sold totaled $1.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $72 million primarily due to foreign exchange and productivity.

Repositioning and Other Charges

          See Note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements for a discussion of repositioning and other charges incurred in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Our repositioning actions are expected to generate incremental pretax savings of approximately $150 million in 2012 compared with 2011 principally from planned workforce reductions. Cash expenditures for severance and other exit costs necessary to execute these actions were $73 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and were funded through operating cash flows. Cash expenditures for severance and other exit costs necessary to execute the remaining actions will approximate a total of $150 million in 2012 and will be funded through operating cash flows.

B. Liquidity and capital resources

Cash flow summary

          Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, are summarized as follows:

	2012			2011
Cash provided by (used for):
Operating activities	$	1,169		$	695
Investing activities		(543	)		(74	)
Financing activities		(48	)		190
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(55	)		87
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	523		$	898

          Cash provided by operating activities increased by $474 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to (i) reduced cash contributions to our pension plans of $512 million, (ii) a $377 million favorable impact from working capital (driven by improved receivables and inventory performance, partially offset by decreased accounts payable) and (iii) increased net income of $210 million, partially offset by decreased accrued expenses of $463 million (primarily due to decreased customer advances and higher payments related to labor costs in the first quarter of 2012) and higher cash tax payments of approximately $100 million.

          Cash used for investing activities increased by $469 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to (i) a decrease in proceeds from sales of businesses of $197 million (most significantly the divestiture of the automotive on-board sensor products business

43

within our Automation and Control Solutions segment in 2011), (ii) an increase of approximately $120 million in settlement payments of foreign currency exchange contracts which are economic hedges on certain nonfunctional currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, (iii) an increase in expenditures for property, plant and equipment of $63 million, and (iv) an increase in cash paid for acquisitions of $56 million.

          Cash used for financing activities increased by $238 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in the net proceeds from debt issuances of $592 million, partially offset by a decrease in net repurchases of common stock of $420 million.

Liquidity

          The Company continues to manage its businesses to maximize operating cash flows as the primary source of liquidity. In addition to our available cash and operating cash flows, additional sources of liquidity include committed credit lines, short-term debt from the commercial paper market, long-term borrowings, access to the public debt and equity markets as well as the ability to sell trade accounts receivables. We continue to balance our cash and financing uses through investment in our existing core businesses, debt reduction, acquisition activity, share repurchases and dividends.

          We continuously assess the relative strength of each business in our portfolio as to strategic fit, market position, profit and cash flow contribution in order to upgrade our combined portfolio and identify business units that will most benefit from increased investment. We identify acquisition candidates that will further our strategic plan and strengthen our existing core businesses. We also identify business units that do not fit into our long-term strategic plan based on their market position, relative profitability or growth potential. These businesses are considered for potential divestiture, restructuring or other repositioning actions subject to regulatory constraints.

          In the first six months of 2012, Honeywell made cash contributions of $523 million to our pension plans. We plan to make up to an additional $500 million of cash contributions to our pension plans over the remainder of 2012 to improve the funded status of our plans. The timing and amount of contributions may be impacted by a number of factors, including the funded status of the plans.

          Under the Company’s previously reported $3 billion share repurchase program, $1.9 billion remained available as of June 30, 2012 for additional share repurchases. Honeywell may repurchase outstanding shares from time to time during 2012 to offset the dilutive impact of employee stock based compensation plans, including future option exercises, restricted unit vesting and matching contributions under our savings plans. The amount and timing of future repurchases may vary depending on market conditions and the level of operating, financing and other investing activities.

44

C. Other Matters

Litigation

          We are subject to a number of lawsuits, investigations and claims (some of which involve substantial amounts) arising out of the conduct of our business. See a discussion of environmental, asbestos and other litigation matters in Note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

          The financial information as of June 30, 2012 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contained in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

          For a discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

          See Note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

          See our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Item 7A). As of June 30, 2012, there has been no material change in this information.

Item 4. Control and Procedures

          Honeywell management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure information required to be disclosed in the reports that Honeywell files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO, our CFO, and our Controller, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There have been no changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Honeywell’s internal control over financial reporting that have occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

          General Legal Matters

          We are subject to a number of lawsuits, investigations and claims (some of which involve substantial amounts) arising out of the conduct of our business. See a discussion of environmental, asbestos and other litigation matters in Note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements.

          Environmental Matters Involving Potential Monetary Sanctions in Excess of $100,000

          Although the outcome of the matter discussed below cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that it will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or operating cash flows.

          The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Department of Justice are investigating whether the Company’s manufacturing facility in Hopewell, Virginia is in compliance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act and the facility’s air operating permit. Based on these investigations, the federal authorities have issued notices of violation with respect to the facility’s benzene waste operations, leak

45

detection and repair program, emissions of nitrogen oxides and emissions of particulate matter. The Company has entered into negotiations with federal authorities to resolve the alleged violations.

Item 6. EXHIBITS

            (a)          Exhibits. See the Exhibit Index on page 48 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

46

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Honeywell International Inc.
Date: July 18, 2012	By:	/s/ Kathleen A. Winters
		Kathleen A. Winters
		Vice President and Controller
		(on behalf of the Registrant
		and as the Registrant’s
		Principal Accounting Officer)

47

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description
	10.1*	Amendment to Supplemental Non-Qualified Savings Plan for Highly Compensated Employees of Honeywell International Inc. and its Subsidiaries, as amended and restated (filed herewith)
	10.2*	2011 Stock Incentive Plan of Honeywell International Inc. and its Affiliates—Form of Restricted Unit Agreement (filed herewith)
	10.3*	2011 Stock Incentive Plan of Honeywell International Inc. and its Affiliates—Form of Restricted Unit Agreement, Form 2 (filed herewith)
	11	Computation of Per Share Earnings (1)
	12	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith)
	15	Independent Accountants’ Acknowledgment Letter as to the incorporation of their report relating to unaudited interim financial statements (filed herewith)
	31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
	31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
	32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
	32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document (filed herewith)
	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema (filed herewith)
	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (filed herewith)
	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase (filed herewith)
	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase (filed herewith)
	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase (filed herewith)

* The Exhibits identified above with an asterisk (*) are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

(1) Data required is provided in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in this report.

48

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT
TO THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NON-QUALIFIED SAVINGS PLAN FOR

HIGHLY COMPENSATED EMPLOYEES OF

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

(as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009)

The Supplemental Non-Qualified Savings Plan for Highly Compensated Employees of Honeywell International Inc. and Its Subsidiaries (the “Plan”) shall be, and hereby is, amended to provide an increased rate of employer matching contributions posted on and after July 1, 2012.

1. The following paragraph shall be added to the end of Section 5(b) of the Plan:

“Effective for Participant Deferred Contributions posted to a Participant’s Account on or after July 1, 2012, there shall be credited to the Participant’s Account Plan Employer Contributions in an aggregate amount equal to (i) minus (ii), where (i) is 37.5% (for Participants entitled to a 37.5% Employer Contribution in the Qualified Savings Plans) or 75% (for Participants entitled to a 75% Employer Contribution in the Qualified Savings Plans) of the lesser of (x) 8% of the Participant’s Base Annual Salary without regard to any limitations that may apply under the Code, or (y) the sum the Participant contributes as Before-Tax Contributions and/or After-Tax Contributions to the Qualified Savings Plans and as Participant Deferred Contributions, and (ii) is the total amount of Employer Contributions contributed to the Participant’s account under the Qualified Savings Plans; provided, however, that in no event shall the combined Plan Employer Contributions and Savings Plan Employer Contributions exceed 8% of the Participant’s Base Annual Salary without regard to any limitations that may apply under the Code, and provided, further, that Plan Employer Contributions shall not be made with respect to a Participant during any period of suspension of Employer Contributions with respect to such Participant under the terms of the Qualified Savings Plans, whether or not such Participant continues to make Participant Contributions under the Qualified Savings Plans during the period of such suspension.”

2. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain the same.

.

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

2011 Stock Incentive Plan
of Honeywell International Inc. and its Affiliates

Restricted Unit Agreement

          RESTRICTED UNIT AGREEMENT made in Morris Township, New Jersey, as of the [DAY] day of [MONTH, YEAR] (the “Award Date”) between Honeywell International Inc. (the “Company”) and [EMPLOYEE NAME] (the “Employee”).

1.	Grant of Award. The Company has granted you [NUMBER] Restricted Units, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan of Honeywell International Inc. and its Affiliates (the “Plan”). The Company will hold the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units (as defined in Section 2)] in a bookkeeping account on your behalf until they become payable or are forfeited or cancelled.
2.	[FOLLOWING INCLUDED AT COMMITTEE’S DISCRETION: Dividend Equivalents. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, you will earn Dividend Equivalents in an amount equal to the value of any cash or stock dividends paid by the Company upon one Share of Common Stock for each unvested Restricted Unit or Additional Restricted Unit (as defined below) credited to your bookkeeping account on a dividend record date. In the case of cash dividends, the Company shall credit to your bookkeeping account, on each dividend payment date, an additional number of Restricted Units (“Additional Restricted Units”) equal to (a) divided by (b), where (a) equals the total number of unvested Restricted Units and Additional Restricted Units, if any, subject to this Agreement on such date multiplied by the dollar amount of the cash dividend paid per Share of Common Stock on such date, and (b) equals the Fair Market Value of a Share on such date. If a dividend is paid to holders of Common Stock in Shares, the Company shall credit to you, on each dividend payment date, Additional Restricted Units equal to the total number of unvested Restricted Units and Additional Restricted Units subject to this Agreement on such date multiplied by the Share dividend paid per Share of Common Stock on such date. Additional Restricted Units are subject to the same restrictions, including but not limited to vesting, transferability and payment restrictions, that apply to the Restricted Units to which they relate.]
3.	Payment Amount. Each Restricted Unit [and Additional Restricted Unit] represents one (1) Share of Common Stock.
4.	Vesting. Except in the event of your Termination of Employment due to death[ or Full Retirement], the incurrence of a Disability, or the occurrence of a Change in Control, the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will vest as follows: [VESTING PROVISIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN].

5.	Form and Timing of Payment. Vested Restricted Units will be redeemed solely for Shares. [FOLLOWING INCLUDED AT COMMITTEE’S DISCRETION: Except as otherwise determined by the Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”), in its sole discretion, vested Additional Restricted Units will be redeemed solely for Shares.] [Subject to a deferral election made pursuant to Section 12, and] except as otherwise provided in Section 7(b) below, payment of vested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be made as soon as practicable following the applicable vesting date but in no event later than two and one-half (2-1/2) months following the end of the calendar year in which the vesting date occurs. As determined by the Company in its sole discretion prior to the vesting date, any fractional Shares may be paid in cash or rounded up or down to the nearest whole Share.
6.	Termination of Employment. Except as otherwise provided in Sections 7(a) and 8 of this Agreement, any Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that have not vested as of your Termination of Employment will immediately be forfeited, and your rights with respect to these Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will end.
7.	Full Retirement, Death or Disability.
	a.	Vesting. If your Termination of Employment occurs due to death or you incur a Disability before the last vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement, all of your unvested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will vest as of your Termination of Employment or Disability, as applicable. If you are deceased, the Company will make a payment to your estate only after the Committee has determined that the payee is the duly appointed executor or administrator of your estate, subject to Section 7.14 of the Plan.
		[INCLUDE AS APPLICABLE: If your Termination of Employment due to Full Retirement occurs before the last vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement, you will be vested in an additional number of Restricted Units [and related Additional Restricted Units] equal to the product of (a) times (b), minus (c), where (a) equals the total number of Restricted Units specified in Section 1 of this Agreement [plus the total number of Additional Restricted Units (both vested and unvested) credited to you as of your Termination of Employment], (b) equals the ratio of your complete years of service as an employee of the Company or its Affiliates between the Award Date and your Termination of Employment, and the number of complete years of service required under this Agreement to be fully vested in all Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units], and (c) equals the number of Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that vested before your Termination of Employment.
		OR For the avoidance of doubt, if your Termination of Employment due to Full Retirement occurs before the last vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement, you will not vest in any Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units] as a result of your termination.
		OR If your Termination of Employment due to Full Retirement occurs before the last vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement, you will be vested in an

		additional number of Restricted Units [and related Additional Restricted Units] equal to [INSERT VESTING PROVISION ON FULL RETIREMENT].]
	b.	Payment. [Subject to a deferral election made pursuant to Section 12,] if your Termination of Employment occurs due to death[ or Full Retirement,] or you incur a Disability, before the last vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement, payment for vested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be made as soon as practicable following your Termination of Employment or Disability, as applicable, but in no event later than the last day of the calendar year in which such Termination of Employment or Disability occurs. [INCLUDE AS APPLICABLE: Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if you are a “specified employee” under Section 409A of the Code as of the date of your Termination of Employment occurs due to Full Retirement, payment for vested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be made on the first business day of the first calendar month that begins after the six-month anniversary of your Termination of Employment, or, if earlier, your death.
		[Subject to a deferral election made pursuant to Section 12,] if (i) you are eligible for Full Retirement on the Award Date or you become eligible for Full Retirement before the last vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement and (ii) your Termination of Employment does not occur before the last vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement, payment for vested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be made as soon as practicable following the applicable vesting date described in Section 4 of this Agreement but in no event later than the last day of the calendar year in which each such vesting date occurs.]
8.	Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that have not vested or terminated as of the date of Change in Control will immediately vest. No later than the earlier of 90 days after the date of Change in Control or two and one-half months after the end of the calendar year in which the Change in Control occurs, you will receive for the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] a single payment in cash equal to the product of the number of outstanding Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] as of the date of the Change in Control (including any Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that vest pursuant to this Section 8) and a multiplication factor, as set forth in the Plan.
9.	Withholdings. The Company or your local employer shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require you to remit to the Company or to your local employer, prior to any issuance or delivery of Shares on Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units], an amount sufficient to satisfy taxes imposed under the laws of any country, state, province, city or other jurisdiction, including but not limited to income taxes, capital gain taxes, transfer taxes, and social security contributions, and National Insurance Contributions, that are required by law to be withheld as determined by the Company or your local employer.
10.	Transfer of Award. You may not transfer the Restricted Units, [Additional Restricted Units] or any interest in such Units except by will or the laws of descent and distribution

	or except as otherwise permitted by the Committee and as specified in the Plan. Any other attempt to dispose of your interest will be null and void.
11.	Requirements for and Forfeiture of Award.
	a.	General. The Award is expressly contingent upon you complying with the terms, conditions and definitions contained in this Section 11 and in any other agreement (including but not limited to Section 11 of the Stock Option Award Agreement for the Option granted on February 25, 2011, if applicable) that governs your noncompetition with Honeywell, your nonsolicitation of Honeywell’s employees, customers, suppliers, business partners and vendors, and/or your conduct with respect to Honeywell’s trade secrets and proprietary and confidential information.
	b.	Remedies.

1.	You expressly agree and acknowledge that the forfeiture provisions of subsection 11.b.3. of this Agreement shall apply if, from the Award Date until the date that is twenty-four (24) months after your Termination of Employment for any reason, you enter into an employment, consultation or similar agreement or arrangement (including any arrangement for service as an agent, partner, stockholder, consultant, officer or director) with any entity or person engaged in a business in which Honeywell is engaged if the business is competitive (in the sole judgment of the Committee) with Honeywell and the Committee has not approved the agreement or arrangement in writing.
2.	In addition to the relief described in subsection 11.b.3 of this Agreement and any other agreement that governs your noncompetition with Honeywell, your nonsolicitation of Honeywell’s employees, customers, suppliers, business partners and vendors, and/or your conduct with respect to Honeywell’s trade secrets and proprietary and confidential information, if the Committee determines, in its sole judgment, that you have violated the terms of any such agreement, (i) any Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that have not vested under this Agreement shall immediately be cancelled, and you shall forfeit any rights you have with respect to such Units as of the date of the Committee’s determination, and (ii) you shall immediately deliver to the Company Shares equal in value to the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] you received prior to the date of the Committee’s determination.
3.	If the Committee determines, in its sole judgment, that you have engaged in an act that violates subsection 11.b.1. of this Agreement, (i) any Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that have not vested under this Agreement shall immediately be cancelled, and you shall forfeit any rights you have with respect to such Units as of the date of the Committee’s determination, and (ii) you shall immediately deliver to the Company Shares equal in value to the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] you received during the period beginning six (6) months prior to your

	Termination of Employment and ending on the date of the Committee’s determination.
4.	Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or this Agreement to the contrary, you acknowledge that the Company may be entitled or required by law, Company policy or the requirements of an exchange on which the Shares are listed for trading, to recoup compensation paid to you pursuant to the Plan, and you agree to comply with any Company request or demand for recoupment.

12.	[FOLLOWING INCLUDED AT COMMITTEE’S DISCRETION: Deferral of Payment. If you would like to defer payment on the Restricted Units and related Additional Restricted Units, you may do so in writing on the deferral form provided with this grant setting forth your desired payment schedule. The deferral will not be permitted if, within the determination of the Company, such deferral would result in a violation of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder. If the deferral is not permitted, then payment will be made as provided in Section 5 or 7(b), as applicable. All Additional Restricted Units will be subject to the same deferral restrictions as the Restricted Units to which they relate. Except as otherwise determined by the Company, Dividend Equivalents credited on deferred Restricted Units and deferred Additional Restricted Units will be paid in cash as soon as practicable following the date such Dividend Equivalents are credited but in no event later than 2-1/2 months following the end of the year in which the Dividend Equivalents vest.]
13.	Restrictions on Payment of Shares. Payment of Shares for your Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] is subject to the conditions that, to the extent required at the time of exercise, (i) the Shares underlying the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be duly listed, upon official notice of redemption, upon the New York Stock Exchange, and (ii) a Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the Shares will be effective. The Company will not be required to deliver any Common Stock until all applicable federal and state laws and regulations have been complied with and all legal matters in connection with the issuance and delivery of the Shares have been approved by counsel for the Company.
14.	Adjustments. Any adjustments to the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be governed by Section 5.3 of the Plan.
15.	Disposition of Securities. By accepting the Award, you acknowledge that you have read and understand the Company’s policy, and are aware of and understand your obligations under applicable securities laws in respect of trading in the Company’s securities. The Company will have the right to recover, or receive reimbursement for, any compensation or profit you realize on the disposition of Shares received for Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units] to the extent that the Company has a right of recovery or reimbursement under applicable securities laws.
16.	Plan Terms Govern. The vesting and redemption of Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units], the disposition of any Shares received for Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units], the treatment of gain on the disposition of these Shares,

	[and the treatment of Dividend Equivalents] are subject to the provisions of the Plan and any rules that the Committee may prescribe. The Plan document, as may be amended from time to time, is incorporated into this Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Agreement have the meaning set forth in the Plan, unless otherwise stated in this Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Plan and the terms of this Agreement, the Plan will control. By accepting the Award, you acknowledge that the Plan and the Plan prospectus, as in effect on the date of this Agreement, have been made available to you for your review.
17.	Personal Data.
	a.	By entering into this Agreement, and as a condition of the grant of the Restricted Units, you expressly consent to the collection, use, and transfer of personal data as described in this Section to the full extent permitted by and in full compliance with applicable law.
	b.	You understand that your local employer holds, by means of an automated data file, certain personal information about you, including, but not limited to, name, home address and telephone number, date of birth, social insurance number, salary, nationality, job title, any shares or directorships held in the Company, details of all restricted units or other entitlement to shares awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested, or outstanding in your favor, for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan (“Data”).
	c.	You further understand that part or all of your Data may be also held by the Company or its Affiliates, pursuant to a transfer made in the past with your consent, in respect of any previous grant of restricted units or awards, which was made for the same purposes of managing and administering of previous award/incentive plans, or for other purposes.
	d.	You further understand that your local employer will transfer Data to the Company or its Affiliates among themselves as necessary for the purposes of implementation, administration, and management of your participation in the Plan, and that the Company or its Affiliates may transfer data among themselves, and/or each, in turn, further transfer Data to any third parties assisting the Company in the implementation, administration, and management of the Plan (“Data Recipients”).
	e.	You understand that the Company or its Affiliates, as well as the Data Recipients, are or may be located in your country of residence or elsewhere, such as the United States. You authorize the Company or its Affiliates, as well as the Data Recipients, to receive, possess, use, retain, and transfer Data in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering, and managing your participation in the Plan, including any transfer of such Data, as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent holding of Shares on your behalf, to a broker or third party with whom the Shares may be deposited.
	f.	You understand that you may show your opposition to the processing and transfer of your Data, and, may at any time, review the Data, request that any necessary

		amendments be made to it, or withdraw your consent herein in writing by contacting the Company. You further understand that withdrawing consent may affect your ability to participate in the Plan.
18.	Discretionary Nature and Acceptance of Award. By accepting this Award, you agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement and acknowledge that:
	a.	The Company (and not your local employer) is granting your Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units]. Furthermore, this Agreement is not derived from any preexisting labor relationship between you and the Company, but rather from a mercantile relationship.
	b.	The Company may administer the Plan from outside your country of residence and United States law will govern all Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] granted under the Plan.
	c.	Benefits and rights provided under the Plan are wholly discretionary and, although provided by the Company, do not constitute regular or periodic payments.
	d.	The benefits and rights provided under the Plan are not to be considered part of your salary or compensation under your employment with your local employer for purposes of calculating any severance, resignation, redundancy or other end of service payments, vacation, bonuses, long-term service awards, indemnification, pension or retirement benefits, or any other payments, benefits or rights of any kind. You waive any and all rights to compensation or damages as a result of the termination of employment with your local employer for any reason whatsoever insofar as those rights result, or may result, from the loss or diminution in value of such rights under the Plan or your ceasing to have any rights under, or ceasing to be entitled to any rights under, the Plan as a result of such termination.
	e.	The grant of Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] hereunder, and any future grant of Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units] under the Plan, is entirely voluntary, and at the complete discretion of the Company. Neither the grant of the Restricted Units, [the Additional Restricted Units] nor any future grant by the Company will be deemed to create any obligation to make any future grants, whether or not such a reservation is explicitly stated at the time of such a grant. The Company has the right, at any time and/or on an annual basis, to amend, suspend or terminate the Plan; provided, however, that no such amendment, suspension, or termination will adversely affect your rights hereunder.
	f.	The Plan will not be deemed to constitute, and will not be construed by you to constitute, part of the terms and conditions of employment. Neither the Company nor your local employer will incur any liability of any kind to you as a result of any change or amendment, or any cancellation, of the Plan at any time.
	g.	Participation in the Plan will not be deemed to constitute, and will not be deemed by you to constitute, an employment or labor relationship of any kind with the Company.

19.	Limitations. Nothing in this Agreement or the Plan gives you any right to continue in the employ of the Company or any of its Affiliates or to interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate your employment at any time. Payment of your Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] is not secured by a trust, insurance contract or other funding medium, and you do not have any interest in any fund or specific asset of the Company by reason of this Award or the account established on your behalf. You have no rights as a shareowner of the Company pursuant to the Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units] until Shares are actually delivered to you.
20.	Incorporation of Other Agreements. This Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding the Restricted Units. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreements, commitments or negotiations concerning the Restricted Units [and the Additional Restricted Units].
21.	Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement will not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions of the Agreement, which will remain in full force and effect. Moreover, if any provision is found to be excessively broad in duration, scope or covered activity, the provision will be construed so as to be enforceable to the maximum extent compatible with applicable law.
22.	Governing Law. The Plan, this Agreement, and all determinations made and actions taken under the Plan or this Agreement shall be governed by the internal substantive laws, and not the choice of law rules, of the State of Delaware and construed accordingly, to the extent not superseded by applicable federal law.
23.	Agreement Changes. The Company reserves the right to change the terms of this Agreement and the Plan without your consent to the extent necessary or desirable to comply with the requirements of Code section 409A, the Treasury regulations and other guidance thereunder.
24.	Acknowledgements. By accepting this Agreement, you agree to the following: (i) you have carefully read, fully understand and agree to all of the terms and conditions described in this Agreement, the Plan, the Plan’s prospectus and all accompanying documentation; and (ii) you understand and agree that this Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding the Restricted Units, and that any prior agreements, commitments or negotiations concerning the Restricted Units are replaced and superseded.
25.	Award Acceptance. To retain this Award, you must accept it by signing the Agreement below and, by signing this Agreement, you will be deemed to consent to the application of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan. If you do not wish to accept this Award, you must contact Honeywell International Inc., Executive Compensation/AB-1D, 101 Columbia Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07962 in writing within thirty (30) days of the Award Date.

I Accept:

Signature Date   

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

2011 Stock Incentive Plan

of Honeywell International Inc. and its Affiliates

RESTRICTED UNIT AGREEMENT, FORM 2

This RESTRICTED UNIT AGREEMENT made in Morris Township, New Jersey, as of the [DAY] day of [MONTH, YEAR] (the “Award Date”) between Honeywell International Inc. (the “Company”) and [EMPLOYEE NAME] (the “Employee”).

1. Grant of Award. The Company has granted you [NUMBER] Restricted Units, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan of Honeywell International Inc. and its Affiliates (the “Plan”). The Company will hold the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units (as defined in Section 4)] in a bookkeeping account on your behalf until they become payable or are forfeited or cancelled.

2. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions apply:

a. “Actual Award” means the product of (i) the Plan Payout Percentage (as determined under Section 3), and (ii) your Target Award.

b. “Compensation Peer Group” means [INSERT COMPANY NAMES]. If there is any change in the corporate capitalization of a company in the Compensation Peer Group during a Measurement Period (such as a stock split, corporate transaction or any partial or complete liquidation), the Committee, in its sole discretion, may take such change into account in determining the Total Shareholder Return of that company. If any company included in the Compensation Peer Group ceases to exist or to be publicly traded during the Measurement Period, or undergoes any other similar change, the Committee shall determine the consequences of such event for purposes of this Agreement, including without limitation, the replacement of such company in the Compensation Peer Group.

c. “Measurement Period” means [DESCRIBE MEASUREMENT PERIOD].

d. “Performance Cycle” means the period beginning on [DATE] and ending on [DATE].

e. “Target Award” means the number of Restricted Units awarded to you for the Performance Cycle under Section 1 of this Agreement.

f. “Total Shareholder Return” means the ratio of (A) a company’s share price as of the last trading day of a Measurement Period (determined using the average closing share price over the 30 preceding trading days) plus earned dividends per share during the Measurement Period, over (B) the company’s share price as of the first trading day of a Measurement Period (determined using the average closing share price over the 30 preceding trading days). Dividends are assumed earned and reinvested on the ex-dividend date.

g. [INSERT ADDITIONAL BUSINESS-RELATED DEFINITIONS AS APPLICABLE]

3. Performance Measures. For each Measurement Period, the Company’s Total Shareholder Return will be compared to the Total Shareholder Return of each company in the Compensation Peer Group, and the Total Shareholder Return of the Compensation Peer Group and the Company shall be ranked. [DESCRIBE OTHER BUSINESS-RELATED PERFORMANCE MEASURES, AS APPLICABLE]

The Plan Payout Percentage shall be determined based on the following for the Performance Cycle: [DESCRIBE HOW PLAN PAYOUT PERCENTAGE IS DETERMINED].

4. [FOLLOWING INCLUDED AT COMMITTEE’S DISCRETION: Dividend Equivalents. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, you will earn Dividend Equivalents in an amount equal to the value of any cash or stock dividends paid by the Company upon one Share of Common Stock for each unvested Restricted Unit or Additional Restricted Unit (as defined below) credited to your bookkeeping account on a dividend record date. At the vesting date specified in Section 6, such Dividend Equivalents shall be adjusted up or down based on your Actual Award. In the case of cash dividends, the Company shall credit to your bookkeeping account, on each dividend payment date, an additional number of Restricted Units (“Additional Restricted Units”) equal to (a) divided by (b), where (a) equals the total number of unvested Restricted Units and Additional Restricted Units, if any, subject to this Agreement on such date multiplied by the dollar amount of the cash dividend paid per Share of Common Stock on such date, and (b) equals the Fair Market Value of a Share on such date. If a dividend is paid to holders of Common Stock in Shares, the Company shall credit to you, on each dividend payment date, Additional Restricted Units equal to the total number of unvested Restricted Units and Additional Restricted Units subject to this Agreement on such date multiplied by the Share dividend paid per Share of Common Stock on such date. Additional Restricted Units are subject to the same restrictions, including but not limited to vesting, transferability and payment restrictions, that apply to the Restricted Units to which they relate with any fractional Shares rounded up to the nearest whole Share You will continue to earn Additional Restricted Units on unpaid Restricted Units and Additional Restricted Units that are held in your bookkeeping account until the vested shares are paid to you.]

5. Payment Amount. Each Restricted Unit [and Additional Restricted Unit] represents one (1) Share of Common Stock.

6. Vesting. Except as otherwise provided in Sections 8, 9 and 10 and a deferral election, the vesting and payment of Restricted Units [and related Additional Restricted Units] is contingent upon you remaining actively employed by the Company on the applicable vesting date(s) specified below: [DESCRIBE VESTING DATE(S)].

Except as otherwise provided in Sections 8, 9 and 10 and a deferral election, payment will be made as soon as practicable following the vesting date, but in no event later than 2-1/2 months after the end of the calendar year in which vesting occurs.

The Actual Award [and related Additional Restricted Units] will be paid solely in Shares.

7. Termination of Employment. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, if your Termination of Employment occurs for any reason before the vesting date(s) specified above, any unvested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be forfeited and your rights with respect to any award under this Agreement will terminate.

8. Death or Disability. If your Termination of Employment occurs because of your death or you incur a Disability before the last day of the Performance Cycle, you or your estate will receive

your Target Award as your Actual Award for the Performance Cycle. [No Additional Restricted Units will be paid in this case. OR Additional Restricted Units will be calculated as provided in Section 4.]

If your Termination of Employment occurs because of your death or you incur a Disability after the last day of the Performance Cycle but before the Actual Award is fully paid, you or your estate will receive the remainder of your unpaid Actual Award for the Performance Cycle. [No Additional Restricted Units will be paid in this case. OR Additional Restricted Units will be calculated as provided in Section 4.]

9. Full Retirement. [INCLUDE AS APPLICABLE: For the avoidance of doubt, if your Termination of Employment occurs solely because of your Full Retirement before the last day of the Performance Cycle, all Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be forfeited and your rights with respect to any award under this Agreement will terminate.

OR

If your Termination of Employment occurs solely because of your Full Retirement before the last day of the Performance Cycle, you will receive a pro-rata payment of your Target Award as your Actual Award equal to the product of (a) times (b), minus (c), where (a) equals the total number of Restricted Units set forth in Section 1 above [plus the total number of Additional Restricted Units credited to you as of your Termination of Employment], (b) equals the ratio of your complete years of service as an employee of the Company or its Affiliates between the Award Date and your Termination of Employment, and the number of complete years of service required under this Agreement to be fully vested in all Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units], and (c) equals the number of Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that vested before your Termination of Employment.

OR

If your Termination of Employment occurs solely because of your Full Retirement before the last day of the Performance Cycle, you will be vested in an additional number of Restricted Units [and related Additional Restricted Units] equal to [INSERT VESTING PROVISION ON FULL RETIREMENT].]

[INCLUDE AS APPLICABLE: If your Termination of Employment occurs solely because of your Full Retirement after the last day of the Performance Cycle but before the Actual Award is fully paid, you will receive the remainder of your unpaid Actual Award for the Performance Cycle.

OR

If your Termination of Employment occurs solely because of your Full Retirement after the last day of the Performance Cycle but before the Actual Award is fully paid, any unpaid Actual Award will be forfeited and your rights with respect to any such Actual Award under this Agreement will terminate.

OR

If your Termination of Employment occurs solely because of your Full Retirement after the last day of the Performance Cycle but before the Actual Award is fully paid, any unpaid Actual Award will be paid as follows: [INSERT VESTING PROVISION ON FULL RETIREMENT].]

[No Additional Restricted Units will be paid in this case. OR Additional Restricted Units will be calculated as provided in Section 4.]

[INCLUDE AS APPLICABLE: Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if you are a “specified employee” under Section 409A of the Code as of the date your Termination of Employment occurs due to Full Retirement, payment for vested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be made on the first business day of the first calendar month that begins after the six-month anniversary of your Termination of Employment, or, if earlier, your death.

Subject to a deferral election, if (i) you are eligible for Full Retirement on the Award Date or you become eligible for Full Retirement before the last vesting date described in Section 6 of this Agreement and (ii) your Termination of Employment does not occur before the last vesting date described in Section 6 of this Agreement, payment for vested Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be made as soon as practicable following the applicable vesting date described in Section 6 of this Agreement but in no event later than the last day of the calendar year in which each such vesting date occurs.]

10. Change in Control. If a Change in Control of the Company occurs before the last day of the Performance Cycle, you will be deemed to have earned your Target Award [and Additional Restricted Units] as your Actual Award. If a Change in Control of the Company occurs after the last day of the Performance Cycle but before the Actual Award is fully paid, you will receive the unpaid remainder of your Actual Award [and Additional Restricted Units] for the Performance Cycle.

[Subject to the terms of a deferral election,] you will receive the award due in a single sum payment no later than the earlier of 90 days after the date of the Change in Control or two and one-half months after the end of the calendar year in which the Change in Control occurs. Such single sum payment will be in cash or Shares, as determined by the Committee.

11. [FOLLOWING INCLUDED AT COMMITTEE’S DISCRETION: Deferral of Payment. If you would like to defer payment on the Restricted Units and related Additional Restricted Units, you may do so in writing on the deferral form provided with this grant setting forth your desired payment schedule. The deferral shall not be permitted if, within the determination of the Company, such deferral would result in a violation of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder. If the deferral is not permitted, then payment shall be made as provided in this Agreement. All Additional Restricted Units shall be subject to the same deferral restrictions as the Restricted Units to which they relate.]

12. Transfer of Awards. You may not transfer the Restricted Units, [Additional Restricted Units] or any interest in such Units except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or except as otherwise permitted by the Committee and as specified in the Plan. Any other attempt to dispose of your interest shall be null and void.

13. Withholdings. The Company or your local employer shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require you to remit to the Company or to your local employer, prior to any issuance or delivery of Shares on Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units], an amount sufficient to satisfy taxes imposed under the laws of any country, state, province, city or other jurisdiction, including but not limited to income taxes, capital gain taxes, transfer taxes, and social security contributions, and National Insurance Contributions, that are required by law to be withheld as determined by the Company or your local employer.

14. Requirements for and Forfeiture of Award.

a. General. The Award is expressly contingent upon you complying with the terms, conditions and definitions contained in this Section 14 and in any other agreement (including but not limited to Section 11 of the Stock Option Award Agreement for the Option granted on February 25, 2011, if applicable) that governs your noncompetition with Honeywell, your nonsolicitation of Honeywell’s employees, customers, suppliers, business partners and vendors, and/or your conduct with respect to Honeywell’s trade secrets and proprietary and confidential information.

b. Remedies.

1. You expressly agree and acknowledge that the forfeiture provisions of subsection 14.b.3. of this Agreement shall apply if, from the Award Date until the date that is twenty-four (24) months after your Termination of Employment for any reason, you enter into an employment, consultation or similar agreement or arrangement (including any arrangement for service as an agent, partner, stockholder, consultant, officer or director) with any entity or person engaged in a business in which Honeywell is engaged if the business is competitive (in the sole judgment of the Committee) with Honeywell and the Committee has not approved the agreement or arrangement in writing.

2. In addition to the relief described in subsection 14.b.3 of this Agreement and any other agreement that governs your noncompetition with Honeywell, your nonsolicitation of Honeywell’s employees, customers, suppliers, business partners and vendors, and/or your conduct with respect to Honeywell’s trade secrets and proprietary and confidential information, if the Committee determines, in its sole judgment, that you have violated the terms of any such agreement, (i) any Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that have not vested under this Agreement shall immediately be cancelled, and you shall forfeit any rights you have with respect to such Units as of the date of the Committee’s determination, and (ii) you shall immediately deliver to the Company Shares equal in value to the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] you received prior to the date of the Committee’s determination.

3. If the Committee determines, in its sole judgment, that you have engaged in an act that violates subsection 14.b.1. of this Agreement, (i) any Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] that have not vested under this Agreement shall immediately be cancelled, and you shall forfeit any rights you have with respect to such Units as of the date of the Committee’s determination, and (ii) you shall immediately deliver to the Company Shares equal in value to the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] you received during the period beginning six (6) months prior to your Termination of Employment and ending on the date of the Committee’s determination.

4. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or this Agreement to the contrary, you acknowledge that the Company may be entitled or required by law, Company policy or the requirements of an exchange on which the Shares are listed for trading, to recoup compensation paid to you pursuant to the Plan, and you agree to comply with any Company request or demand for recoupment.

15. Restrictions on Payment of Shares. Payment of Shares for your Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] is subject to the conditions that, to the extent required at the time of

exercise, (i) the Shares underlying the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] shall be duly listed, upon official notice of redemption, upon the New York Stock Exchange, and (ii) a Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the Shares shall be effective. The Company shall not be required to deliver any Common Stock until all applicable federal and state laws and regulations have been complied with and all legal matters in connection with the issuance and delivery of the Shares have been approved by counsel for the Company.

16. Adjustments. Any adjustments to the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] will be governed by Section 5.3 of the Plan.

17. Disposition of Securities. By accepting the Award, you acknowledge that you have read and understand (i) the Company’s policy, and are aware of and understand your obligations under applicable securities laws in respect of trading in the Company’s securities and (ii) the Company’s stock ownership guidelines as they apply to this Award. The Company shall have the right to recover, or receive reimbursement for, any compensation or profit you realize on the disposition of Shares received for Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units] to the extent that the Company has a right of recovery or reimbursement under applicable securities laws.

18. Plan Terms Govern. The vesting and redemption of Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units], the disposition of any Shares received for Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units], the treatment of gain on the disposition of these Shares, and the treatment of Dividend Equivalents are subject to the provisions of the Plan and any rules that the Committee may prescribe. The Plan document, as may be amended from time to time, is incorporated into this Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Agreement have the meaning set forth in the Plan, unless otherwise stated in this Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Plan and the terms of this Agreement, the Plan shall control. By accepting the Award, you acknowledge that the Plan and the Plan prospectus, as in effect on the date of this Agreement, have been made available to you for your review. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, you agree that all determinations made by the Committee of Total Shareholder Return and the Company’s ranking within the Compensation Peer Group shall be final, binding and conclusive on you in accordance with Article III of the Plan.

19. Personal Data.

a. By entering into this Agreement, and as a condition of the grant of the Restricted Units, you expressly consent to the collection, use, and transfer of personal data as described in this Section to the full extent permitted by and in full compliance with applicable law.

b. You understand that your local employer holds, by means of an automated data file, certain personal information about you, including, but not limited to, name, home address and telephone number, date of birth, social insurance number, salary, nationality, job title, any shares or directorships held in the Company, details of all restricted units or other entitlement to shares awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested, or outstanding in your favor, for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan (“Data”).

c. You further understand that part or all of your Data may be also held by the Company or its Affiliates, pursuant to a transfer made in the past with your consent, in respect of any previous grant of restricted units or awards, which was made for the same purposes of managing and administering of previous award/incentive plans, or for other purposes.

d. You further understand that your local employer will transfer Data to the Company or its Affiliates among themselves as necessary for the purposes of implementation, administration, and management of your participation in the Plan, and that the Company or its Affiliates may transfer data among themselves, and/or each, in turn, further transfer Data to any third parties assisting the Company in the implementation, administration, and management of the Plan (“Data Recipients”).

e. You understand that the Company or its Affiliates, as well as the Data Recipients, are or may be located in your country of residence or elsewhere, such as the United States. You authorize the Company or its Affiliates, as well as the Data Recipients, to receive, possess, use, retain, and transfer Data in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering, and managing your participation in the Plan, including any transfer of such Data, as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent holding of Shares on your behalf, to a broker or third party with whom the Shares may be deposited.

f. You understand that you may show your opposition to the processing and transfer of your Data, and, may at any time, review the Data, request that any necessary amendments be made to it, or withdraw your consent herein in writing by contacting the Company. You further understand that withdrawing consent may affect your ability to participate in the Plan.

20. Discretionary Nature and Acceptance of Award. By accepting this Award, you agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement and acknowledge that:

a. The Company (and not your local employer) is granting your Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units]. Furthermore, this Agreement is not derived from any preexisting labor relationship between you and the Company, but rather from a mercantile relationship.

b. The Company may administer the Plan from outside your country of residence and United States law will govern all Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] granted under the Plan.

c. Benefits and rights provided under the Plan are wholly discretionary and, although provided by the Company, do not constitute regular or periodic payments.

d. The benefits and rights provided under the Plan are not to be considered part of your salary or compensation under your employment with your local employer for purposes of calculating any severance, resignation, redundancy or other end of service payments, vacation, bonuses, long-term service awards, indemnification, pension or retirement benefits, or any other payments, benefits or rights of any kind. You waive any and all rights to compensation or damages as a result of the termination of employment with your local employer for any reason whatsoever insofar as those rights result, or may result, from the loss or diminution in value of such rights under the Plan or your ceasing to have any rights under, or ceasing to be entitled to any rights under, the Plan as a result of such termination.

e. The grant of Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] hereunder, and any future grant of Restricted Units [or Additional Restricted Units] under the Plan, is entirely voluntary, and at the complete discretion of the Company. Neither the grant of the Restricted Units [, Additional Restricted Units] nor any future grant by the Company

will be deemed to create any obligation to make any future grants, whether or not such a reservation is explicitly stated at the time of such a grant. The Company has the right, at any time and/or on an annual basis, to amend, suspend or terminate the Plan; provided, however, that no such amendment, suspension, or termination will adversely affect your rights hereunder.

f. The Plan will not be deemed to constitute, and will not be construed by you to constitute, part of the terms and conditions of employment. Neither the Company nor your local employer will incur any liability of any kind to you as a result of any change or amendment, or any cancellation, of the Plan at any time.

g. Participation in the Plan will not be deemed to constitute, and will not be deemed by you to constitute, an employment or labor relationship of any kind with the Company.

21. Limitations. Nothing in this Agreement or the Plan gives you any right to continue in the employ of the Company or any of its Affiliates or to interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate your employment at any time. Payment of your Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] is not secured by a trust, insurance contract or other funding medium, and you do not have any interest in any fund or specific asset of the Company by reason of this Award or the account established on your behalf. You have no rights as a shareowner of the Company pursuant to the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units] until Shares are actually delivered to you.

22. Incorporation of Other Agreements. This Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding the Restricted Units. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreements, commitments or negotiations concerning the Restricted Units [and Additional Restricted Units].

23. Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions of the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. Moreover, if any provision is found to be excessively broad in duration, scope or covered activity, the provision shall be construed so as to be enforceable to the maximum extent compatible with applicable law.

24. Governing Law. The Plan, this Agreement, and all determinations made and actions taken under the Plan or this Agreement shall be governed by the internal substantive laws, and not the choice of law rules, of the State of Delaware and construed accordingly, to the extent not superseded by applicable federal law.

25. Agreement Changes. The Company reserves the right to change the terms of this Agreement and the Plan without your consent to the extent necessary or desirable to comply with the requirements of Code section 409A, the Treasury regulations and other guidance thereunder.

26. Acknowledgements. By accepting this Agreement, you agree to the following: (i) you have carefully read, fully understand and agree to all of the terms and conditions described in this Agreement, the Plan, the Plan’s prospectus and all accompanying documentation; and (ii) you understand and agree that this Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding the Restricted Units, and that any prior agreements, commitments or negotiations concerning the Restricted Units are replaced and superseded.

27. Award Acceptance. To retain this Award, you must accept it by signing the Agreement below and, by signing this Agreement, you shall be deemed to consent to the application of the terms

and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan. If you do not wish to accept this Award, you must contact Honeywell International Inc., Executive Compensation/AB-1D, 101 Columbia Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07962 in writing within thirty (30) days of the Award Date.

I Accept:

____________________________________

Signature Date

EX-12

EXHIBIT 12

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)

Determination of Earnings:
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	2,345
Add (Deduct):
Amortization of capitalized interest		10
Fixed charges		204
Equity income, net of distributions		(24	)
Total earnings, as defined	$	2,535
Fixed Charges:
Rents(a)	$	28
Interest and other financial charges		176
		204
Capitalized interest		9
Total fixed charges	$	213
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges		11.90

(a) Denotes the equivalent of an appropriate portion of rentals representative of the interest factor on all rentals other than for capitalized leases.

EX-15

EXHIBIT 15

July 18, 2012

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated July 18, 2012 on our review of interim financial information of Honeywell International Inc. (the “Company”) for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.033-55425, 333-22355, 333-101455 and 333-165036), Form S-8 (No. 033-51455, 033-58347, 333-57515, 333-57517, 333-57519, 333-83511, 333-49280, 333-57868, 333-105065, 333-108461, 333-136083, 333-136086, 333-146932, 333-148995, and 333-175260) and Form S-4 (No. 333-82049).

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Cote, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Honeywell International Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 18, 2012	By:	/s/ David M. Cote
		David M. Cote
		Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Honeywell International Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
		b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
		c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
		d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
		a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
		b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 18, 2012	By:	/s/ David J. Anderson
		David J. Anderson
		Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Honeywell International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Cote, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:	/s/ David M. Cote
	David M. Cote
	Chief Executive Officer
	July 18, 2012

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Honeywell International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:	/s/ David J. Anderson
	David J. Anderson
	Chief Financial Officer
	July 18, 2012

XML

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (Details) (USD $) Share data in Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Earnings Per Share, Basic [Abstract]
Income from continuing operations less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$ 902,000,000	$ 796,000,000	$ 1,725,000,000	$ 1,483,000,000
Income from discontinued operations	0	14,000,000	0	32,000,000
Net income attributable to Honeywell	902,000,000	810,000,000	1,725,000,000	1,515,000,000
Weighted average shares outstanding	781.4	785.0	779.3	785.2
Earnings per share continuing operations - basic:	$ 1.15	$ 1.01	$ 2.21	$ 1.89
Earnings per share discontinued operations - basic:	$ 0	$ 0.02	$ 0	$ 0.04
Earnings per share: Basic	$ 1.15	$ 1.03	$ 2.21	$ 1.93
Assuming dilution
Income from continuing operations less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	902,000,000	796,000,000	1,725,000,000	1,483,000,000
Income from discontinued operations	0	14,000,000	0	32,000,000
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$ 902,000,000	$ 810,000,000	$ 1,725,000,000	$ 1,515,000,000
Average shares
Weighted average shares outstanding	781.4	785.0	779.3	785.2
Dilutive securities issuable - stock plans	9.1	12.3	10.0	12.3
Total weighted average diluted shares outstanding	790.5	797.3	789.3	797.5
Earnings per share continuing operations - assuming dilution:	$ 1.14	$ 1.00	$ 2.19	$ 1.86
Earnings per share discontinued operations - assuming dilution:	$ 0	$ 0.02	$ 0	$ 0.04
Earnings per share - Assuming dilution	$ 1.14	$ 1.02	$ 2.19	$ 1.90
Earnings Per Share Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Stock options excluded from diluted computations	16.6	7.9	13.1	7.5

XML

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES 5 (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member] | Accounts, Notes and Other Receivables [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivatives Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Asset	$ 27	$ 18
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member] | Accounts, Notes and Other Receivables [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivatives Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Asset	1	8
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member] | Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivatives Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Liability	69	50
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member] | Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivatives Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Liability	6	2
Interest Rate Swap Agreements [Member] | Other Assets [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivatives Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Asset	149	134
Commodity Contracts [Member] | Accounts, Notes and Other Receivables [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivatives Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Asset	1	1
Commodity Contracts [Member] | Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivatives Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Liability	$ 6	$ 10

XML

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES 3 (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Asset	$ 28	$ 26
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Liability	75	52
Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Interest Rate Swap Agreements [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Asset	149	134
Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Commodity Contracts [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Asset	1	1
Derivative Fair Value Of Derivative Liability	6	10
Level 1 and Level 2 inputs | Available-for-sale Securities [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available for sale investments	$ 434	$ 359

XML

DIVESTITURES (Details) (Consumer Products Group [Member], USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011
Consumer Products Group [Member]
Divestitures Paragraph Details [Line Items]
Sale price	$ 955
Pre-tax gain on sale	301
Gain on sale, net of tax	$ 178

XML

INVENTORIES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Inventories [Abstract]

Inventories

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Raw materials	$	1,222	$	1,222
Work in process		887		958
Finished products		2,432		2,253
		4,541		4,433
Reduction to LIFO cost basis		(199)		(169)
	$	4,342	$	4,264

XML

SEGMENT FINANCIAL REPORTING (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Product sales	$ 7,475,000,000	$ 7,146,000,000	$ 14,852,000,000	$ 13,959,000,000
Service sales	1,960,000,000	1,940,000,000	3,890,000,000	3,799,000,000
Revenues	9,435,000,000	9,086,000,000	18,742,000,000	17,758,000,000
Total segment profit	1,493,000,000	1,301,000,000	2,908,000,000	2,561,000,000
Other income	9,000,000	8,000,000	14,000,000	28,000,000
Interest and other financial charges	(87,000,000)	(96,000,000)	(176,000,000)	(195,000,000)
Stock compensation expense	(40,000,000)	(42,000,000)	(91,000,000)	(91,000,000)
Pension ongoing expense	(9,000,000)	(22,000,000)	(22,000,000)	(57,000,000)
Other postretirement income/(expense)	(9,000,000)	45,000,000	(32,000,000)	27,000,000
Repositioning and other charges	(134,000,000)	(94,000,000)	(256,000,000)	(227,000,000)
Income from continuing operations before taxes	1,223,000,000	1,100,000,000	2,345,000,000	2,046,000,000
Aerospace [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Product sales	1,750,000,000	1,559,000,000	3,455,000,000	3,025,000,000
Service sales	1,277,000,000	1,251,000,000	2,522,000,000	2,481,000,000
Revenues	3,027,000,000	2,810,000,000	5,977,000,000	5,506,000,000
Total segment profit	562,000,000	451,000,000	1,096,000,000	918,000,000
Repositioning and other charges	0	6,000,000	(1,000,000)	6,000,000
Automation and Control Solutions [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Product sales	3,407,000,000	3,331,000,000	6,658,000,000	6,467,000,000
Service sales	555,000,000	549,000,000	1,092,000,000	1,069,000,000
Revenues	3,962,000,000	3,880,000,000	7,750,000,000	7,536,000,000
Total segment profit	525,000,000	496,000,000	1,016,000,000	955,000,000
Repositioning and other charges	(10,000,000)	(12,000,000)	(9,000,000)	(45,000,000)
Performance Materials And Technologies [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Product sales	1,418,000,000	1,266,000,000	2,885,000,000	2,512,000,000
Service sales	128,000,000	140,000,000	276,000,000	249,000,000
Revenues	1,546,000,000	1,406,000,000	3,161,000,000	2,761,000,000
Total segment profit	350,000,000	281,000,000	669,000,000	565,000,000
Repositioning and other charges	0	0	(14,000,000)	(13,000,000)
Transportation Systems [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Product sales	900,000,000	990,000,000	1,854,000,000	1,955,000,000
Service sales	0	0	0	0
Revenues	900,000,000	990,000,000	1,854,000,000	1,955,000,000
Total segment profit	114,000,000	129,000,000	234,000,000	247,000,000
Repositioning and other charges	(60,000,000)	(40,000,000)	(112,000,000)	(76,000,000)
Corporate [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Product sales	0	0	0	0
Service sales	0	0	0	0
Revenues	0	0	0	0
Total segment profit	(58,000,000)	(56,000,000)	(107,000,000)	(124,000,000)
Repositioning and other charges	$ (64,000,000)	$ (48,000,000)	$ (120,000,000)	$ (99,000,000)

XML

GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES-NET (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Finite And Indefinite Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Trademarks with indefinite lives	$ 715,000,000		$ 725,000,000
Gross Carrying Amount	3,901,000,000		3,960,000,000
Accumulated Amortization	(1,576,000,000)		(1,483,000,000)
Net carrying amount	2,325,000,000		2,477,000,000
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Amortization of intangible assets	126,000,000	125,000,000
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Amount	3,186,000,000		3,235,000,000
Accumulated Amortization	(1,576,000,000)		(1,483,000,000)
Net Carrying Amount	1,610,000,000		1,752,000,000
Goodwill [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period,	11,858,000,000
Acquisitions	47,000,000
Divestitures	(3,000,000)
Currency Translation Adjustment	(65,000,000)
Balance at end of period,	11,837,000,000
Aerospace [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period,	2,095,000,000
Acquisitions	2,000,000
Divestitures	(3,000,000)
Currency Translation Adjustment	(2,000,000)
Balance at end of period,	2,092,000,000
Automation and Control Solutions [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period,	8,260,000,000
Acquisitions	45,000,000
Divestitures	0
Currency Translation Adjustment	(58,000,000)
Balance at end of period,	8,247,000,000
Performance Materials And Technologies [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period,	1,306,000,000
Acquisitions	0
Divestitures	0
Currency Translation Adjustment	(5,000,000)
Balance at end of period,	1,301,000,000
Transportation Systems [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period,	197,000,000
Acquisitions	0
Divestitures	0
Currency Translation Adjustment	0
Balance at end of period,	197,000,000
Patents and Technology [Member]
Finite And Indefinite Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Accumulated Amortization	(796,000,000)		(761,000,000)
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Amount	1,134,000,000		1,151,000,000
Accumulated Amortization	(796,000,000)		(761,000,000)
Net Carrying Amount	338,000,000		390,000,000
Customer Relationships [Member]
Finite And Indefinite Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Accumulated Amortization	(552,000,000)		(493,000,000)
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Amount	1,707,000,000		1,718,000,000
Accumulated Amortization	(552,000,000)		(493,000,000)
Net Carrying Amount	1,155,000,000		1,225,000,000
Trademarks [Member]
Finite And Indefinite Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Accumulated Amortization	(92,000,000)		(84,000,000)
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Amount	156,000,000		155,000,000
Accumulated Amortization	(92,000,000)		(84,000,000)
Net Carrying Amount	64,000,000		71,000,000
Other Intangible Assets [Member]
Finite And Indefinite Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Accumulated Amortization	(136,000,000)		(145,000,000)
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Amount	189,000,000		211,000,000
Accumulated Amortization	(136,000,000)		(145,000,000)
Net Carrying Amount	$ 53,000,000		$ 66,000,000

XML

REPOSITIONING AND OTHER CHARGES 4 (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Pretax Impact Of Total Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Segment [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charges	$ 134,000,000	$ 94,000,000	$ 256,000,000	$ 227,000,000
Aerospace [Member]
Pretax Impact Of Total Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Segment [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charges	0	(6,000,000)	1,000,000	(6,000,000)
Automation and Control Solutions [Member]
Pretax Impact Of Total Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Segment [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charges	10,000,000	12,000,000	9,000,000	45,000,000
Performance Materials And Technologies [Member]
Pretax Impact Of Total Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Segment [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charges	0	0	14,000,000	13,000,000
Transportation Systems [Member]
Pretax Impact Of Total Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Segment [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charges	60,000,000	40,000,000	112,000,000	76,000,000
Corporate [Member]
Pretax Impact Of Total Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Segment [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charges	$ 64,000,000	$ 48,000,000	$ 120,000,000	$ 99,000,000

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended					1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012 claims	Dec. 31, 2011 claims	Dec. 31, 2010 claims	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2007	Jan. 31, 2010 New Jersey Chrome Sites [Member] T	Jun. 30, 2012 New Jersey Chrome Sites [Member] sites	Jun. 30, 2012 Dundalk Marine Terminal [Member]
Asbestos Related Liabilities Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Insurance receivable as value of asbestos claim historical, percent	40.00%
Insurance receivable as value of asbestos claim projected, percent	33.00%
Environmental Matters [Abstract]
Beginning of period	$ 723,000,000
Accruals for environmental matters deemed probable and reasonably estimable	128,000,000
Environmental liability payments	(136,000,000)
End of period	715,000,000	723,000,000
Loss Contingency Classification of Accrual [Abstract]
Accrued liabilities	302,000,000	303,000,000
Other liabilities	413,000,000	420,000,000
Total environmental liabilities	715,000,000	723,000,000
Loss Contingency, Disease Distribution of Unresolved Claims [Abstract]
Mesothelioma and Other Cancer Claims	5,334	4,943	4,856
Nonmalignant claims	17,535	17,628	17,624
Claims unresolved at the end of period	22,869	22,571	22,480
Loss Contingency, Narco and Bendix Asbestos Related Balances by Balance Sheet Caption [Abstract]
Other current assets	71,000,000	71,000,000
Insurance recoveries for asbestos related liabilities	672,000,000	709,000,000
Total assets	743,000,000	780,000,000
Accrued liabilities	239,000,000	237,000,000
Asbestos Related Liabilities	1,522,000,000	1,499,000,000
Total liabilities	1,761,000,000	1,736,000,000
Resolution Values Per Claim [Abstract]
Malignant Claims		48,000	54,000	50,000	65,000	33,000
Nonmalignant Claims		$ 1,000	$ 1,300	$ 200	$ 1,500	$ 500
Site Contingency [Line Items]
Study area 7 chromium residue							The excavation and offsite disposal of approximately one million tons of chromium residue present at a predecessor Honeywell site located in Jersey City, New Jersey, known as Study Area 7, was completed in January 2010.
Approximate amount of chromium residue in Study Area 7 (tons)							1,000,000
Site Contingency Number Of Aco Sites								21
Publicly funded sites, fully responsible								24
Publicly funded sites, total								53
Partially responsible sites, percent								50.00%
Number of sites, partially responsible								10
Cost of developing and implementing permanent remedy percent									77.00%

XML

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES 4 (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member]
Cash Flow Hedge Income Statement Location [Line Items]
Cash flow hedge gain (loss) reclassified to revenue, net	$ (9,000,000)	$ 10,000,000	$ (6,000,000)	$ 16,000,000
Cash flow hedge gain (loss) reclassified to costs of products sold	7,000,000	(11,000,000)	10,000,000	(16,000,000)
Cash flow hedge gain (loss) reclassified to selling and general administrative costs	(3,000,000)	4,000,000	3,000,000	6,000,000
Commodity Contracts [Member]
Cash Flow Hedge Income Statement Location [Line Items]
Cash flow hedge gain (loss) reclassified to costs of products sold	$ (7,000,000)	$ 1,000,000	$ (13,000,000)	$ 0

XML

REPOSITIONING AND OTHER CHARGES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Repositioning And Other Charges [Abstract]

REPOSITIONING AND OTHER CHARGES

Note 4. Repositioning and Other Charges

	A summary of repositioning and other charges follows:
			Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
			June 30,				June 30,
			2012		2011		2012		2011
Severance		$	37	$	16	$	52	$	43
Asset impairments			2		-		11		10
Exit costs			8		1		16		12
Adjustments			(23)		(10)		(30)		(14)
Total net repositioning charge			24		7		49		51
Asbestos related litigation charges,
net of insurance			43		40		79		78
Probable and reasonably estimable
environmental liabilities			67		50		128		101
Other			0		(3)		0		(3)
Total net repositioning and other charges		$	134	$	94	$	256	$	227

The following table summarizes the pretax distribution of total net repositioning and other charges by income statement classification:
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of products and services sold	$	132	$	84	$	251	$	202
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2		10		5		25
	$	134	$	94	$	256	$	227

The following table summarizes the pretax impact of total net repositioning and other charges by segment:
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Aerospace	$	-	$	(6)	$	1	$	(6)
Automation and Control Solutions		10		12		9		45
Performance Materials and Technologies		-		-		14		13
Transportation Systems		60		40		112		76
Corporate		64		48		120		99
	$	134	$	94	$	256	$	227

In the quarterended June 30, 2012, we recognized repositioning charges totaling $47 million including severance costs of $37 million (related to workforce reductions of 559 manufacturing and administrative positions)in our Automation and Control Solutions, Transportation Systems and Aerospace segments. The workforce reductions were primarily related to cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives. The repositioning charge also included exit costs of$8 million mainly related to closure obligations associated with the planned shutdown of a Transportation Systems manufacturing facility. Also, $23 million of previously established accruals for severance in our Automation and Control Solutions and Aerospace segments were returned to income in the second quarter of 2012 due primarily to fewer employee severance actionscaused by higher attrition than originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

In the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we recognized repositioning charges totaling $17 million primarily for severance costs related to workforce reductions of 360 manufacturing and administrative positions in our Automation and Control Solutions and Aerospace segments. The workforce reductions were related to cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives and the consolidation of U.S.repair facilities in our Aerospace segment. Also, $10 million of previously established accruals for severance at our Aerospace segment were returned to income in the second quarter of 2011 due to fewer employee separationsthan originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized repositioning charges totaling $79 million including severance costs of $52million related to workforce reductions of 1,177 manufacturing and administrative positionsacross all of oursegments. The workforce reductions were primarily related tothe planned shutdown of a manufacturing facility in our Transportation Systems segment, the exit from a product line in our Performance Materials and Technologies segment, and cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives.The repositioning charge also included asset impairments of $11million principally related to manufacturing plant and equipment associated with the exit of a product line in our Performance Materials and Technologies segment.The repositioning charge also included exit costs of $16 million principally related to closure obligations associated with the planned shutdown of manufacturing facilities and exit of a product line. Also, $30 million of previously established accruals for severance at our Automation and Control Solutions and Aerospace segments were returned to income in the first six months of 2012 due primarilyto fewer employee severance actionscaused by higher attrition than originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized repositioning charges totaling$65 million including severance costs of $43million related to workforce reductions of 946manufacturing and administrative positions in our Automation and Control Solutions, Aerospace and Performance Materials and Technologies segments. The workforce reductions were primarily related to cost savings actions taken in connection with our ongoing functional transformation and productivity initiatives, factory transitions in connection with acquisition-related synergies in our Automation and Control Solutions segment, the exit from and/or rationalization of certain product lines and markets in our Performance Materials and Technologies and Automation and Control Solutions segments, the consolidation of U.S. repair facilities in our Aerospace segment,and an organizational realignment of a business in our Automation and Control Solutions segment. The repositioning charge also included asset impairments of $10 million principally related to manufacturing plant and equipment associated with the exit of a product line and a factory transition as discussed above. The repositioning charge also included exit costs of $12 million principally for costs to terminate contracts, including an operating lease, related to the exit of a market and a factory transition as discussed above. Also, $14 million of previously established accruals, primarily for severance at our Aerospace and Automation and Control Solutions segments, were returned to income in the first six months of 2011 due principally to fewer employee separations than originally planned associated with prior severance programs.

The following table summarizes the status of our total repositioning reserves:
		Severance		Asset		Exit
		Costs		Impairments		Costs		Total
December 31, 2011	$	353	$	-	$	59	$	412
Charges		52		11		16		79
Usage - cash		(58)		-		(15)		(73)
Usage - noncash		-		(11)		-		(11)
Foreign currency translation		(13)		-		-		(13)
Adjustments		(30)		-		-		(30)
June 30, 2012	$	304	$	-	$	60	$	364

Certain repositioning projects in our Aerospace, Automation and Control Solutions and Transportation Systems segments included exit or disposal activities, the costs related to which will be recognized in future periods when the actual liability is incurred. The nature of these exit or disposal costs includes asset set-up and moving, product recertification and requalification, and employee retention, training and travel. The following tables summarize by segment, expected, incurred and remaining exit and disposal costs related to 2011 and 2010 repositioning actions which we were not able to recognize at the time the actions were initiated. The exit and disposal costs related to the repositioning actions in 2012 which we were not able to recognize at the time the actions were initiated were not significant.

					Automation
					and Control		Transportation
2011 Repositioning Actions			Aerospace		Solutions		Systems		Total
Expected exit and disposal costs		$	15	$	15	$	7	$	37
Costs incurred during:
	Year ended December 31, 2011		(1)		-		-		(1)
	Current year-to-date		-		(3)		-		(3)
Remaining exit and disposal costs at
	June 30, 2012	$	14	$	12	$	7	$	33

					Automation
					and Control		Transportation
2010 Repositioning Actions			Aerospace		Solutions		Systems		Total
Expected exit and disposal costs		$	11	$	10	$	2	$	23
Costs incurred during:
	Year ended December 31, 2010		-		-		-		-
	Year ended December 31, 2011		(2)		(3)		(1)		(6)
	Current year-to-date		-		-		(1)		(1)
Remaining exit and disposal costs at
	June 30, 2012	$	9	$	7	$	-	$	16

In the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we recognized a charge of $67million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the quarter. We also recognized a charge of $43million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2012, net of probable insurance recoveries. Environmental and Asbestos matters are discussed in detail in Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies.

In the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a charge of $50 million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the quarter. We also recognized a charge of $40 million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2011, net of probable insurance recoveries.

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized a charge of $128 million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the period. We also recognized a charge of $79 million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2012, net of probable insurance recoveries.

In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a charge of $101 million for environmental liabilities deemed probable and reasonably estimable in the period. We also recognized a charge of $78 million primarily representing an update to our estimated liability for the resolution of Bendix related asbestos claims as of June 30, 2011, net of probable insurance recoveries.

XML

LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified			1 Months Ended																												6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Apr. 30, 2012 Syndicate Of Banks [Member] Revolving Credit Facility [Member]	Mar. 31, 2011 Syndicate Of Banks [Member] Revolving Credit Facility [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 4.25% due 2013 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 4.25% due 2013 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 3.875% due 2014 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 3.875% due 2014 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 5.40% due 2016 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 5.40% due 2016 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 5.30% due 2017 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 5.30% due 2017 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 5.30% due 2018 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 5.30% due 2018 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 5.00% due 2019 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 5.00% due 2019 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Industrial development bond obligations, floating rate maturing at various dates through 2037 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Industrial development bond obligations, floating rate maturing at various dates through 2037 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Debentures 6.625% due 2028 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Debentures 6.625% due 2028 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Debentures 9.065% due 2033 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Debentures 9.065% due 2033 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 5.70% due 2036 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 5.70% due 2036 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 5.70% due 2037 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 5.70% due 2037 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 4.25% due 2021 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 4.25% due 2021 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes 5.375% due 2041 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Notes 5.375% due 2041 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Other including capitalized leases, .6% to 9.5% maturing at various dates through 2023 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Other including capitalized leases, .6% to 9.5% maturing at various dates through 2023 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior Notes					$ 600	$ 600	$ 600	$ 600	$ 400	$ 400	$ 400	$ 400	$ 900	$ 900	$ 900	$ 900							$ 550	$ 550	$ 600	$ 600	$ 800	$ 800	$ 600	$ 600
Industrial development bond																	37	37
Debentures																			216	216	51	51
Other long term debt																															308	242
Total long-term debt, including current portion	6,962	6,896
Less: Current portion	620	15
Long-term debt	6,342	6,881
Various interest rates					4.25%		3.875%		5.40%		5.30%		5.30%		5.00%				6.625%		9.065%		5.70%		5.70%		4.25%		5.375%
Interest rate range minimum																															0.60%
Interest rate range maximum																															9.50%
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Borrowing Capacity Description			The Credit Agreement is maintained for general corporate purposes and amends and restates the previous $2,800 million five year credit agreement dated March 31, 2011 (“Prior Agreement”). There have been no borrowings under the Credit Agreement or the Prior Agreement.
Maximum Borrowing Capacity			3,500	2,800
Sub-Limit for Letters of Credit			700
Line of credit facility, covenant terms			The Credit Agreement does not restrict our ability to pay dividends and contains no financial covenants. The failure to comply with customary conditions or the occurrence of customary events of default contained in the credit agreement would prevent any further borrowings and would generally require the repayment of any outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement. Such events of default include: (a) non-payment of credit agreement debt, interest or fees; (b) non-compliance with the terms of the credit agreement covenants; (c) cross-default to other debt in certain circumstances; (d) bankruptcy or insolvency; and (e) defaults upon obligations under Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Additionally, each of the banks has the right to terminate its commitment to lend additional funds or issue letters of credit under the agreement if any person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 30 percent or more of our voting stock, or, during any 12-month period, individuals who were directors of Honeywell at the beginning of the period cease to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors. The Credit Agreement has substantially the same material terms and conditions as the Prior Agreement with an improvement in pricing and an extension of maturity. Loans under the Credit Agreement are required to be repaid no later than April 2, 2017, unless such date is extended pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement. We have agreed to pay a facility fee of 0.08 percent per annum on the aggregate commitment.
Facility expiration date			2017-04-02
Facility fee percent			0.08%
Line of credit facility, current borrowing capacity			3,000
Interest rates applied to borrowings			Revolving credit borrowings under the Credit Agreement would bear interest, at Honeywell’s option, (A) (1) at a rate equal to the highest of (a) the floating base rate publicly announced by Citibank, N.A., (b) 0.5% above the Federal funds rate or (c) Libor plus 1.00%, plus (2) a margin based on Honeywell’s credit default swap mid-rate spread and subject to a floor and a cap as set forth in the Credit Agreement (the “Applicable Margin”) minus 1.00%, provided such margin shall not be less than zero; or (B) at a rate equal to Libor plus the Applicable Margin; or (C) by a competitive bidding procedure
Facility initiation date			Apr. 02, 2012
Minimum ownership percentage to trigger termination option			30.00%
Long Term Debt By Maturity Abstract
2012	15
2013	637
2014	627
2015	4
2016	455
Thereafter	5,224
Total long-term debt, including current portion	6,962	6,896
Less: Current portion	620	15
Total Long-term portion	$ 6,342	$ 6,881

XML

NONCONTROLLING INTEREST (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Noncontrolling Interest [Abstract]

Noncontrolling Interest Disclosure Table [Text Block]

Changes in noncontrolling interest consist of the following:
		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2012	2011
Balance beginning of period, December 31	$	96	121
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		3	3
Acquisitions		-	(1)
Dividends paid		(7)	(10)
Other owner changes		(2)	(1)
Balance end of period, June 30	$	90	112

XML

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Financial Instruments And Fair Value Measures [Abstract]

Schedule Of Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring Basis Table Text Block

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Assets:
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	28	$	26
Available for sale investments		434		359
Interest rate swap agreements		149		134
Forward commodity contracts		1		1
Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	75	$	52
Forward commodity contracts		6		10

Financial assets and liabilities that were not carried at fair value

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Assets
Long-term receivables	$	161	$	159	$	132	$	132
Liabilities
Long-term debt and related current maturities	$	6,962	$	8,107	$	6,896	$	7,896

Asset and Liability Derivatives Both Designated and Not Designated as Hedging Instruments at Fair Value

Fair value of derivatives classified as assets consist of the following:
			June 30,		December 31,
Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables	$	27	$	18
Interest rate swap agreements	Other assets		149		134
Commodity contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables		1		1
			June 30,		December 31,
Not Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables	$	1	$	8
Fair value of derivatives classified as liabilities consist of the following:
			June 30,		December 31,
Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accrued liabilities	$	69	$	50
Commodity contracts	Accrued liabilities		6		10
			June 30,		December 31,
Not Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accrued liabilities	$	6	$	2

Gains (losses) recognized in OCI and reclassified from AOCI to income

Gains (losses) recognized in OCI (effective portions) consist of the following:
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June, 30				June, 30
Designated Cash Flow Hedge		2012		2011		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	(50)	$	8	$	(11)	$	16
Commodity contracts		0		(1)		(9)		2

Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to income consist of the following:
			Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
Designated			June 30,				June 30,
Cash Flow Hedge	Income Statement Location		2012		2011		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Product sales	$	(9)	$	10	$	(6)	$	16
	Cost of products sold		7		(11)		10		(16)
	Sales & general administrative		(3)		4		3		6
Commodity contracts	Cost of products sold	$	(7)	$	1	$	(13)	$	0

XML

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Derivative [Line Items]
Fixed Rate Debt Percent changed to LIBOR	4.09%	4.09%
Amount of fixed rate debt	$ 1,400	$ 1,400
Carrying (Reported) Amount, Fair Value Disclosure [Member]
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Long-term receivables	161	132
Long-term debt and related current maturities	6,962	6,896
Estimate of Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member]
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Long-term receivables	159	132
Long-term debt and related current maturities	8,107	7,896
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative, Notional Amount	5,870	7,108
Commodity Contracts [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative, Notional Amount	$ 32	$ 59

XML

SEGMENT FINANCIAL DATA (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Segment Financial Data [Abstract]

Segment Financial Data

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Net Sales
Aerospace
Products	$	1,750	$	1,559	$	3,455	$	3,025
Services		1,277		1,251		2,522		2,481
Total		3,027		2,810		5,977		5,506
Automation and Control Solutions
Products		3,407		3,331		6,658		6,467
Services		555		549		1,092		1,069
Total		3,962		3,880		7,750		7,536
Performance Materials and Technologies
Products		1,418		1,266		2,885		2,512
Services		128		140		276		249
Total		1,546		1,406		3,161		2,761
Transportation Systems
Products		900		990		1,854		1,955
Services		-		-		-		-
Total		900		990		1,854		1,955
Corporate
Products		-		-		-		-
Services		-		-		-		-
Total		-		-		-		-
	$	9,435	$	9,086	$	18,742	$	17,758
Segment Profit
Aerospace	$	562	$	451	$	1,096	$	918
Automation and Control Solutions		525		496		1,016		955
Performance Materials and Technologies		350		281		669		565
Transportation Systems		114		129		234		247
Corporate		(58)		(56)		(107)		(124)
Total Segment Profit		1,493		1,301		2,908		2,561
Other income(a)		9		8		14		28
Interest and other financial charges		(87)		(96)		(176)		(195)
Stock compensation expense(b)		(40)		(42)		(91)		(91)
Pension ongoing expense(b)		(9)		(22)		(22)		(57)
Other postretirement income/(expense)(b)		(9)		45		(32)		27
Repositioning and other charges (b)		(134)		(94)		(256)		(227)
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	1,223	$	1,100	$	2,345	$	2,046
(a) Equity income/(loss) of affiliated companies is included in Segment Profit.
(b) Amounts included in cost of products and services sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

XML

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Pension and Other Post Retirements Disclosure Paragraph Details [Abstract]

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Pension Benefits
		U.S. Plans
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Service cost	$	64	$	53	$	128	$	116
Interest cost		185		191		369		381
Expected return on plan assets		(255)		(254)		(510)		(507)
Amortization of prior service cost		7		9		14		17
Settlements and curtailments		-		9		-		24
	$	1	$	8	$	1	$	31
		Non-U.S. Plans
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Service cost	$	12	$	15	$	24	$	30
Interest cost		55		60		110		120
Expected return on plan assets		(73)		(72)		(145)		(143)
Amortization of transition obligation		1		1		1		1
Amortization of prior service (credit)		(1)		(1)		(1)		(1)
Settlements and curtailments		-		1		2		1
	$	(6)	$	4	$	(9)	$	8
Other Postretirement Benefits
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Service cost	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1
Interest cost		13		17		27		35
Amortization of prior service (credit)		(4)		(9)		(7)		(22)
Recognition of actuarial losses		5		6		16		18
Settlements and curtailments		(6)		(61)		(6)		(61)
	$	8	$	(47)	$	30	$	(29)

XML

DIVESTITURES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Acquisitions And Divestitures [Abstract]

DIVESTITURES

Note 3. Divestitures

In July 2011, the Company sold its Consumer Products Group business (CPG) to Rank Group Limited. The sale was completed for approximately $955 million in cash proceeds, resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $301 million and approximately $178 million net of tax. The gain was recorded in net income from discontinued operations after taxes in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.The net income attributable to the non-controlling interest for the discontinued operations was insignificant. The sale of CPG, which had been part of the Transportation Systems segment, is consistent with the Company's strategic focus on its portfolio of differentiated global technologies.

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]

Loss Contingency

December 31, 2011	$	723
Accruals for environmental matters deemed
probable and reasonably estimable		128
Environmental liability payments		(136)
June 30, 2012	$	715

Environmental liabilities are included in the following balance sheet accounts:

Environmental liabilities are included in the following balance sheet accounts:
			June 30,		December 31,
			2012		2011
	Accrued liabilities	$	302	$	303
	Other liabilities		413		420
		$	715	$	723

Asbestos liabilities roll forward

Asbestos Related Liabilities
		Bendix		NARCO		Total
December 31, 2011	$	613	$	1,123	$	1,736
Accrual for update to estimated liability		103		(1)		102
Asbestos related liability payments		(76)		(1)		(77)
June 30, 2012	$	640	$	1,121	$	1,761

Insurance recoveries roll forward

Insurance Recoveries for Asbestos Related Liabilities
		Bendix		NARCO		Total
December 31, 2011	$	162	$	618	$	780
Probable insurance recoveries related to
estimated liability		10		-		10
Insurance receivables settlements		5		8		13
Insurance receipts for asbestos related liabilities		(24)		(36)		(60)
June 30, 2012	$	153	$	590	$	743

NARCO and Bendix asbestos related asset and liability balances

NARCO and Bendix asbestos related balances are included in the following balance sheet accounts:
		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Other current assets	$	71	$	71
Insurance recoveries for asbestos related liabilities		672		709
	$	743	$	780
Accrued liabilities	$	239	$	237
Asbestos related liabilities		1,522		1,499
	$	1,761	$	1,736

Bendix related asbestos claims activity

	Six Months Ended		Year Ended
		June 30,	December 31,
Claims Activity		2012	2011	2010
Claims Unresolved at the beginning of period		22,571	22,480	19,940
Claims Filed during the period (a)		1,731	3,592	4,302
Claims Resolved during the period(b)		(1,433)	(3,501)	(1,762)
Claims Unresolved at the end of period		22,869	22,571	22,480
(a) The number of claims filed in 2010 includes approximately 1,541 non-malignant claims (with an accrued liability of approximately $575 thousand in the aggregate), a majority of which had previously been dismissed in Mississippi and re-filed in Arkansas.
(b) The number of claims resolved in 2011 includes approximately 351 claims previously classified as inactive (82% non-malignant and accrued liability of approximately $1.7 million) which were activated during 2011. The number of claims resolved in 2010 includes approximately 1,300 claims previously classified as inactive (95% non-malignant and accrued liability of approximately $2.0 million) which were activated during 2010.

Disease distribution of claims

Disease Distribution of Unresolved Claims	June 30,	December 31,
	2012	2011	2010
Mesothelioma and Other Cancer Claims	5,334	4,943	4,856
Nonmalignant Claims	17,535	17,628	17,624
Total Claims	22,869	22,571	22,480

Average resolution values per asbestos claim

	Honeywell has experienced average resolution values per claim excluding legal costs as follows:
			Year Ended December 31,
			2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
			(in whole dollars)
Malignant claims		$	48,000	$	54,000	$	50,000	$	65,000	$	33,000
Nonmalignant claims		$	1,000	$	1,300	$	200	$	1,500	$	500

XML

ACCOUNTS, NOTES AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Accounts Receivable, Net Current [Abstract]
Trade	$ 6,946	$ 6,926
Other	529	555
Accounts receivable, gross	7,475	7,481
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts	225	253
Accounts receivable, net	7,250	7,228
Accounts Notes, And Other Receivables Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Unbilled contract receivable	$ 1,538	$ 1,404

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 2 (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012 claims	Dec. 31, 2010 claims	Jun. 30, 2012 Bendix Asbestos Loss Contingency Liability [Member] claims	Dec. 31, 2011 Bendix Asbestos Loss Contingency Liability [Member] claims	Dec. 31, 2010 Bendix Asbestos Loss Contingency Liability [Member] claims	Jun. 30, 2012 Narco Asbestos Loss Contingency Liability [Member]	Dec. 31, 2008 Allen Matter [Member] claims	May 31, 2011 Allen Matter [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 UAW [Member]
Loss Contingency By Nature Of Contingency [Line Items]
Agreed upon financing related to third party bankruptcy filing						$ 20,000,000
Future payment to asbestos claimants						16,000,000
Payment to third party parent company upon reorganization						40,000,000
Future liabilities range low						743,000,000
Future liabilities range high						961,000,000	500,000,000
Insurance coverage remaining						48,000,000
Annual cap on Trust						150,000,000
Exceptions To Cap [Abstract]
Amount not included in cap						100,000,000
Estimated value of approved claims						130,000,000
Estimated value of settlement agreements						150,000,000
Loss Contingency Claims [Abstract]
Claims unresolved at the beginning of period	22,571	22,480	22,571	22,480	19,940		21
Claims filed during the period			1,731	3,592	4,302
Claims resolved during the period			(1,433)	(3,501)	(1,762)		(18)
Claims unresolved at the end of period	22,869	22,480	22,869	22,571	22,480		3
Asbestos Related Liabilities Disclosure [Abstract]
Asbestos related liabilities, beginning of period	1,736,000,000		613,000,000			1,123,000,000
Accrual for update to estimated liability	102,000,000		103,000,000			(1,000,000)
Asbestos related liability payments	(77,000,000)		(76,000,000)			(1,000,000)
Asbestos related liabilities, end of period	1,761,000,000		640,000,000	613,000,000		1,121,000,000
Asbestos Related Liabilities Insurance Recoveries [Abstract]
Insurance Recoveries, beginning of period	780,000,000		162,000,000			618,000,000
Probable insurance recoveries related to estimated liability	10,000,000		10,000,000			0
Insurance receivables settlements	13,000,000		5,000,000			8,000,000
Insurance receipts for asbestos related liabilities	(60,000,000)		(24,000,000)			(36,000,000)
Insurance Recoveries, end of period	743,000,000		153,000,000	162,000,000		590,000,000
Loss Contingency Claims Footnote [Abstract]
Previously classified as inactive, claims				351	1,300
Previously classified as inactive, non-malignant, Percent				82.00%	95.00%
Previously classified as inactive, liability				1,700,000	2,000,000
Number of non-malignant claims re-filed					1,541
Non-malignant claims re-filed, liability					575,000
Other Matters [Abstract]
Allen settlement amount							35,000,000
Future liabilities range high						961,000,000	500,000,000
Litigation settlement to be paid for remaining claims								23,800,000
Potential OPEB increase due to adverse ruling									$ 150,000,000

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Product sales	$ 7,475,000,000	$ 7,146,000,000	$ 14,852,000,000	$ 13,959,000,000
Service sales	1,960,000,000	1,940,000,000	3,890,000,000	3,799,000,000
Net sales	9,435,000,000	9,086,000,000	18,742,000,000	17,758,000,000
Costs, expenses and other
Cost of products sold	5,582,000,000	5,425,000,000	11,153,000,000	10,619,000,000
Cost of services sold	1,340,000,000	1,239,000,000	2,649,000,000	2,469,000,000
Cost of products and services sold	6,922,000,000	6,664,000,000	13,802,000,000	13,088,000,000
Selling, general and administrative expenses	1,226,000,000	1,248,000,000	2,457,000,000	2,480,000,000
Other (income) expense	(23,000,000)	(22,000,000)	(38,000,000)	(51,000,000)
Interest and other financial charges	87,000,000	96,000,000	176,000,000	195,000,000
Total operating and non-operating expenses	8,212,000,000	7,986,000,000	16,397,000,000	15,712,000,000
Income from continuing operations before taxes	1,223,000,000	1,100,000,000	2,345,000,000	2,046,000,000
Tax expense	318,000,000	304,000,000	615,000,000	560,000,000
Income from continuing operations after taxes	905,000,000	796,000,000	1,730,000,000	1,486,000,000
Income from discontinued operations after taxes	0	14,000,000	0	32,000,000
Net income	905,000,000	810,000,000	1,730,000,000	1,518,000,000
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	3,000,000	0	5,000,000	3,000,000
Net income attributable to Honeywell	902,000,000	810,000,000	1,725,000,000	1,515,000,000
Amounts attributable to Honeywell
Income from continuing operations less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	902,000,000	796,000,000	1,725,000,000	1,483,000,000
Income from discontinued operations	0	14,000,000	0	32,000,000
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$ 902,000,000	$ 810,000,000	$ 1,725,000,000	$ 1,515,000,000
Earnings per share continuing operations - basic:	$ 1.15	$ 1.01	$ 2.21	$ 1.89
Earnings per share discontinued operations - basic:	$ 0	$ 0.02	$ 0	$ 0.04
Earnings per share: Basic	$ 1.15	$ 1.03	$ 2.21	$ 1.93
Earnings per share continuing operations - assuming dilution:	$ 1.14	$ 1.00	$ 2.19	$ 1.86
Earnings per share discontinued operations - assuming dilution:	$ 0	$ 0.02	$ 0	$ 0.04
Earnings per share - Assuming dilution	$ 1.14	$ 1.02	$ 2.19	$ 1.90
Cash dividends per share of common stock	$ 0.3725	$ 0.3325	$ 0.7450	$ 0.6650

XML

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES 2 (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Cash Flow Hedge Gain (Loss) Reclassified to Income Statement Locations Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Gain (loss) on interest rate swap agreements	$ 29,000,000	$ 24,000,000	$ 15,000,000	$ 33,000,000
Foreign exchange mark to market expense (income)	61,000,000	(27,000,000)	51,000,000	(50,000,000)
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts [Member]
Gains Losses Recognized In Oci [Line Items]
Gains (losses) recognized in OCI (effective portions)	(50,000,000)	8,000,000	(11,000,000)	16,000,000
Commodity Contracts [Member]
Gains Losses Recognized In Oci [Line Items]
Gains (losses) recognized in OCI (effective portions)	0	(1,000,000)	(9,000,000)	2,000,000
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Fair Value By Balance Sheet Grouping Paragraph Details [Line Items]
Non-Financial assets	18,000,000	15,000,000	18,000,000	15,000,000	262,000,000	32,000,000
Asset impairment	$ 7,000,000	$ 2,000,000	$ 18,000,000	$ 12,000,000

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

Note1. Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of Honeywell International Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries at June 30, 2012 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and cash flows for the six months endedJune 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 should not necessarily be taken as indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the entire year.We have evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of our consolidated financial statements.

       We report our quarterly financial information using a calendar convention; that is, the first, second and third quarters are consistently reported as ending on March 31, June 30 and September 30, respectively. It has been our practice to establish actual quarterly closing dates using a predetermined “fiscal” calendar, which requires our businesses to close their books on a Saturday in order to minimize the potentially disruptive effects of quarterly closing on our business processes. The effects of this practice are generally not significant to reported results for any quarter and only exist within a reporting year. In the event that differences in actual closing dates are material to year-over-year comparisons of quarterly or year-to-date results, we provide appropriate disclosures. Our actual closing dates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were June30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, respectively.

       The financial information as of June 30, 2012 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contained in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

       Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

The Consumer Products Group (CPG) automotive aftermarket business (divested in July 2011) had historically been part of the Transportation Systems reportable segment. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, CPG results are excluded from continuing operations and are presented as discontinued operations in all periods presented. See Note 3 Divestitures for further details.

XML

REPOSITIONING AND OTHER CHARGES 2 (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Income Statement Classification [Line Items]
Cost of products and services sold	$ 6,922,000,000	$ 6,664,000,000	$ 13,802,000,000	$ 13,088,000,000
Selling, general and administrative expenses	1,226,000,000	1,248,000,000	2,457,000,000	2,480,000,000
Total net repositioning and other charges	134,000,000	94,000,000	256,000,000	227,000,000
Restructuring Charges [Member]
Net Repositioning And Other Charges By Income Statement Classification [Line Items]
Cost of products and services sold	132,000,000	84,000,000	251,000,000	202,000,000
Selling, general and administrative expenses	2,000,000	10,000,000	5,000,000	25,000,000
Total net repositioning and other charges	$ 134,000,000	$ 94,000,000	$ 256,000,000	$ 227,000,000

XML

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Other Income Expense [Abstract]

Other (income) expense

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Equity (income)/loss of affiliated companies	$	(14)	$	(14)	$	(24)	$	(23)
Loss/(gain) on sale of non-strategic businesses
and assets		1		(2)		1		(46)
Interest income		(14)		(14)		(28)		(27)
Foreign exchange		3		10		13		18
Other, net		1		(2)		-		27
	$	(23)	$	(22)	$	(38)	$	(51)

XML

REPOSITIONING AND OTHER CHARGES 3 (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended			12 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012 Severance Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Severance Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Severance Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Severance Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Asset Impairments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Asset Impairments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Asset Impairments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Asset Impairments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Exit Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Exit Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Exit Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Exit Costs [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Restructuring Reserve Accrual Adjustments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Restructuring Reserve Accrual Adjustments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Restructuring Reserve Accrual Adjustments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Restructuring Reserve Accrual Adjustments [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Aerospace [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Aerospace [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Aerospace [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Aerospace [Member] Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Aerospace [Member] Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Automation and Control Solutions [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Automation and Control Solutions [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Automation and Control Solutions [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Automation and Control Solutions [Member] Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Automation and Control Solutions [Member] Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Transportation Systems [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Transportation Systems [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Transportation Systems [Member] Repositioning Actions 2010 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Transportation Systems [Member] Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Transportation Systems [Member] Repositioning Actions 2011 [Member]
Restructuring And Related Activities Environmental Matters Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Probable and reasonably estimable environmental liabilities	$ 67,000,000	$ 50,000,000	$ 128,000,000	$ 101,000,000
Asbestos related litigation charges, net of insurance	43,000,000	40,000,000	79,000,000	78,000,000
Restructuring And Related Activities Reportable Segment [Line Items]
Expected exit and disposal costs																					23,000,000		0	37,000,000		11,000,000		0	15,000,000		10,000,000		0	15,000,000		2,000,000		0	7,000,000
Cost incurred year-to-date	24,000,000	7,000,000	49,000,000	51,000,000	37,000,000	16,000,000	52,000,000	43,000,000	2,000,000	0	11,000,000	10,000,000	8,000,000	1,000,000	16,000,000	12,000,000	(23,000,000)	(10,000,000)	(30,000,000)	(14,000,000)	(1,000,000)	(6,000,000)		(3,000,000)	(1,000,000)	0	(2,000,000)		0	(1,000,000)	0	(3,000,000)		(3,000,000)	0	(1,000,000)	(1,000,000)		0	0
Remaining exit and disposal costs at end of period																					16,000,000			33,000,000		9,000,000			14,000,000		7,000,000			12,000,000		0			7,000,000
Restructuring Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period,			412,000,000				353,000,000				0				59,000,000
Charges			79,000,000				52,000,000				11,000,000				16,000,000
Usage - cash			(73,000,000)				(58,000,000)				0				(15,000,000)
Usage - noncash			(11,000,000)				0				(11,000,000)				0
Foreign currency translation adjustment			(13,000,000)				(13,000,000)				0				0
Adjustments			(30,000,000)				(30,000,000)				0				0
Balance at end of period,	$ 364,000,000		$ 364,000,000		$ 304,000,000		$ 304,000,000		$ 0		$ 0		$ 60,000,000		$ 60,000,000

XML

ACCOUNTS, NOTES AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Accounts, Notes And Other Receivables [Abstract]

Schedule or trade, notes, and other receivables

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Trade	$	6,946	$	6,926
Other		529		555
		7,475		7,481
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts		225		253
	$	7,250	$	7,228

XML

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]

New Accounting Pronouncements And Changes In Accounting Principles [Text Block]

Note2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of accounting standards updates (ASU's) to theFASB's Accounting Standards Codification.

The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASU's. ASU's not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to disclosure requirements for common fair value measurement. These amendments, effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), result in common definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Consequently, the amendments change some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The implementation of the amended accounting guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued amendments to disclosure requirements for presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance, effective retrospectively for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted), requirespresentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to defer the presentation on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements. The implementation of the amended accounting guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued amendments to the goodwill impairment guidance which provides an option for companies to use a qualitative approach to test goodwill for impairment if certain conditions are met. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted). The implementation of the amended accounting guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net income	$ 905,000,000	$ 810,000,000	$ 1,730,000,000	$ 1,518,000,000
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign exchange translation adjustment	(420,000,000)	116,000,000	(231,000,000)	507,000,000
Actuarial gains	5,000,000	25,000,000	5,000,000	25,000,000
Prior service credit	0	10,000,000	0	10,000,000
Prior service credit (cost) recognized during year	1,000,000	(1,000,000)	3,000,000	(4,000,000)
Actuarial losses recognized during the year	3,000,000	4,000,000	10,000,000	10,000,000
Settlements and curtailments	(4,000,000)	(35,000,000)	(2,000,000)	(35,000,000)
Foreign exchange translation and other	1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000
Pension and other postretirement benefit adjustments	6,000,000	4,000,000	17,000,000	7,000,000
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period	(5,000,000)	28,000,000	38,000,000	8,000,000
Changes in fair value of available for sale investments	(5,000,000)	28,000,000	38,000,000	8,000,000
Effective portion of cash flow hedges recognized in OCI	(48,000,000)	7,000,000	(23,000,000)	15,000,000
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income	(12,000,000)	4,000,000	(6,000,000)	6,000,000
Changes in fair value of effective cash flow hedges	(36,000,000)	3,000,000	(17,000,000)	9,000,000
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(455,000,000)	151,000,000	(193,000,000)	531,000,000
Comprehensive income	450,000,000	961,000,000	1,537,000,000	2,049,000,000
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non controlling interest	(1,000,000)	0	3,000,000	3,000,000
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Honeywell	$ 451,000,000	$ 961,000,000	$ 1,534,000,000	$ 2,046,000,000

XML

NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Noncontrolling Interest [Abstract]

Noncontrolling Interest Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 12. Noncontrolling Interest

Changes in noncontrolling interest consist of the following:
		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2012	2011
Balance beginning of period, December 31	$	96	121
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		3	3
Acquisitions		-	(1)
Dividends paid		(7)	(10)
Other owner changes		(2)	(1)
Balance end of period, June 30	$	90	112

In the six months ended June 30, 2012and June 30, 2011,there were no increases or decreases to Honeywell additional paid in capital for purchases or sales of existing noncontrolling interests.

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document type	10-Q
Document period end date	Jun. 30, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Amendment flag	false
Entity registrant name	Honeywell International Inc
Entity central index key	0000773840
Entity current reporting status	Yes
Entity voluntary filers	No
Current fiscal year end date	--12-31
Entity filer category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity well known seasoned issuer	Yes
Entity common stock shares outstanding	780,568,568

XML

SEGMENT FINANCIAL DATA

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Segment Financial Data [Abstract]

SEGMENT FINANCIAL DATA

Note13. Segment Financial Data

Honeywell's senior management evaluates segment performance based on segment profit. Segment profit is measured as business unit income (loss) before taxes excluding general corporate unallocated expense, other income (expense), interest and other financial charges, pension and other postretirement benefits (expense), stock compensation expense, repositioning and other charges and accounting changes.

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Net Sales
Aerospace
Products	$	1,750	$	1,559	$	3,455	$	3,025
Services		1,277		1,251		2,522		2,481
Total		3,027		2,810		5,977		5,506
Automation and Control Solutions
Products		3,407		3,331		6,658		6,467
Services		555		549		1,092		1,069
Total		3,962		3,880		7,750		7,536
Performance Materials and Technologies
Products		1,418		1,266		2,885		2,512
Services		128		140		276		249
Total		1,546		1,406		3,161		2,761
Transportation Systems
Products		900		990		1,854		1,955
Services		-		-		-		-
Total		900		990		1,854		1,955
Corporate
Products		-		-		-		-
Services		-		-		-		-
Total		-		-		-		-
	$	9,435	$	9,086	$	18,742	$	17,758
Segment Profit
Aerospace	$	562	$	451	$	1,096	$	918
Automation and Control Solutions		525		496		1,016		955
Performance Materials and Technologies		350		281		669		565
Transportation Systems		114		129		234		247
Corporate		(58)		(56)		(107)		(124)
Total Segment Profit		1,493		1,301		2,908		2,561
Other income(a)		9		8		14		28
Interest and other financial charges		(87)		(96)		(176)		(195)
Stock compensation expense(b)		(40)		(42)		(91)		(91)
Pension ongoing expense(b)		(9)		(22)		(22)		(57)
Other postretirement income/(expense)(b)		(9)		45		(32)		27
Repositioning and other charges (b)		(134)		(94)		(256)		(227)
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	1,223	$	1,100	$	2,345	$	2,046
(a) Equity income/(loss) of affiliated companies is included in Segment Profit.
(b) Amounts included in cost of products and services sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 4,221	$ 3,698
Accounts, notes and other receivables	7,250	7,228
Inventories	4,342	4,264
Deferred income taxes	269	460
Investments and other current assets	562	484
Total current assets	16,644	16,134
Investments and long-term receivables	566	494
Property, plant and equipment - net	4,735	4,804
Goodwill	11,837	11,858
Other intangible assets - net	2,325	2,477
Insurance recoveries for asbestos related liabilities	672	709
Deferred income taxes	2,164	2,132
Other assets	1,231	1,200
Total assets	40,174	39,808
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	4,547	4,738
Short-term borrowings	65	60
Commercial paper	948	599
Current maturities of long-term debt	620	15
Accrued liabilities	6,632	6,863
Total current liabilities	12,812	12,275
Long-term debt	6,342	6,881
Deferred income taxes	681	676
Postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions	1,365	1,417
Asbestos related liabilities	1,522	1,499
Other liabilities	5,369	6,158
SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY
Capital - common stock issued	958	958
Capital - additional paid in capital	4,201	4,157
Common stock held in treasury, at cost	(8,751)	(8,948)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,637)	(1,444)
Retained earnings	17,222	16,083
Total Honeywell shareowners' equity	11,993	10,806
Noncontrolling interest	90	96
Total shareowners' equity	12,083	10,902
Total liabilities and shareowners' equity	$ 40,174	$ 39,808

XML

ACCOUNTS, NOTES AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Accounts, Notes And Other Receivables [Abstract]

Accounts, Notes and Other Receivables

Note 7. Accounts, Notes and Other Receivables

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Trade	$	6,946	$	6,926
Other		529		555
		7,475		7,481
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts		225		253
	$	7,250	$	7,228

Trade Receivables includes $1,538 and $1,404 million of unbilled balances under long-term contracts as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These amounts are billed in accordance with the terms of customer contracts to which they relate.

XML

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Note6. Earnings Per Share

       The details of the earnings per share calculations for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30				June 30
Basic		2012		2011		2012		2011
Income from continuing operations less net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	902	$	796	$	1,725	$	1,483
Income from discontinued operations		-		14		-		32
Net income attributable to Honeywell		902		810		1,725		1,515
Weighted average shares outstanding		781.4		785.0		779.3		785.2
Earnings per share of common stock
Income from continuing operations		1.15		1.01		2.21		1.89
Income from discontinued operations		-		0.02		-		0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.15	$	1.03	$	2.21	$	1.93

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30				June 30
Assuming Dilution		2012		2011		2012		2011
Income from continuing operations less net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	902	$	796	$	1,725	$	1,483
Income from discontinued operations		-		14		-		32
Net income attributable to Honeywell		902		810		1,725		1,515
Average Shares
Weighted average shares outstanding		781.4		785.0		779.3		785.2
Dilutive securities issuable - stock plans		9.1		12.3		10.0		12.3
Total weighted average shares outstanding		790.5		797.3		789.3		797.5
Earnings per share of common stock
Income from continuing operations		1.14		1.00		2.19		1.86
Income from discontinued operations		-		0.02		-		0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.14	$	1.02	$	2.19	$	1.90

The diluted earnings per share calculations exclude the effect of stock options when the options' assumed proceeds exceed the average market price of the common shares during the period. For the three and six months endedJune 30, 2012, the weighted average number of stock options excluded from the computations were 16.6 and 13.1million, respectively. For thethree and six months endedJune 30, 2011, the weighted average number of stock options excluded from the computations were 7.9 and 7.5 million, respectively. These stock options were outstanding at the end of each of the respective periods.

XML

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Earnings Per Share (Tables) [Abstract]

Earnings per share basic

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30				June 30
Basic		2012		2011		2012		2011
Income from continuing operations less net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	902	$	796	$	1,725	$	1,483
Income from discontinued operations		-		14		-		32
Net income attributable to Honeywell		902		810		1,725		1,515
Weighted average shares outstanding		781.4		785.0		779.3		785.2
Earnings per share of common stock
Income from continuing operations		1.15		1.01		2.21		1.89
Income from discontinued operations		-		0.02		-		0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.15	$	1.03	$	2.21	$	1.93

Earnings per share diluted

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30				June 30
Assuming Dilution		2012		2011		2012		2011
Income from continuing operations less net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	902	$	796	$	1,725	$	1,483
Income from discontinued operations		-		14		-		32
Net income attributable to Honeywell		902		810		1,725		1,515
Average Shares
Weighted average shares outstanding		781.4		785.0		779.3		785.2
Dilutive securities issuable - stock plans		9.1		12.3		10.0		12.3
Total weighted average shares outstanding		790.5		797.3		789.3		797.5
Earnings per share of common stock
Income from continuing operations		1.14		1.00		2.19		1.86
Income from discontinued operations		-		0.02		-		0.04
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$	1.14	$	1.02	$	2.19	$	1.90

XML

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Pension and Other Post Retirements Disclosure Paragraph Details [Abstract]

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

Note14. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

       Net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs for our significant defined benefit plans include the following components:

Pension Benefits
		U.S. Plans
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Service cost	$	64	$	53	$	128	$	116
Interest cost		185		191		369		381
Expected return on plan assets		(255)		(254)		(510)		(507)
Amortization of prior service cost		7		9		14		17
Settlements and curtailments		-		9		-		24
	$	1	$	8	$	1	$	31
		Non-U.S. Plans
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Service cost	$	12	$	15	$	24	$	30
Interest cost		55		60		110		120
Expected return on plan assets		(73)		(72)		(145)		(143)
Amortization of transition obligation		1		1		1		1
Amortization of prior service (credit)		(1)		(1)		(1)		(1)
Settlements and curtailments		-		1		2		1
	$	(6)	$	4	$	(9)	$	8
Other Postretirement Benefits
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Service cost	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1
Interest cost		13		17		27		35
Amortization of prior service (credit)		(4)		(9)		(7)		(22)
Recognition of actuarial losses		5		6		16		18
Settlements and curtailments		(6)		(61)		(6)		(61)
	$	8	$	(47)	$	30	$	(29)

Honeywell made cash contributions of $256 millionand $267 million to our pension plans in the first and second quarter of 2012, respectively.

If required, a mark to market adjustment will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 in accordance with our pension accounting method as described in Note 1 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 contained in our Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2012.

XML

LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Long Term Debt And Credit Agreements [Abstract]

Long-term Debt and Credit Agreements

Note 10. Long-term Debt and Credit Agreements

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
4.25% notes due 2013	$	600	$	600
3.875% notes due 2014		600		600
5.40% notes due 2016		400		400
5.30% notes due 2017		400		400
5.30% notes due 2018		900		900
5.00% notes due 2019		900		900
4.25% notes due 2021		800		800
5.375% notes due 2041		600		600
Industrial development bond obligations, floating
rate maturing at various dates through 2037		37		37
6.625% debentures due 2028		216		216
9.065% debentures due 2033		51		51
5.70% notes due 2036		550		550
5.70% notes due 2037		600		600
Other (including capitalized leases), 0.6%-9.5%
maturing at various dates through 2023		308		242
		6,962		6,896
Less: Current portion		620		15
	$	6,342	$	6,881

The schedule of principal payments on long term debt is as follows:
		June 30, 2012
2012	$	15
2013		637
2014		627
2015		4
2016		455
Thereafter		5,224
		6,962
Less: Current portion		620
	$	6,342

On April 2, 2012, the Company entered into a $3,000 million Amended and Restated Five Year Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. Commitments under the Credit Agreement can be increased pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement to an aggregate amount not to exceed $3,500 million. The Credit Agreement contains a $700 million sub-limit for the issuance of letters of credit. The Credit Agreement is maintained for general corporate purposes and amends and restates the previous $2,800 million five year credit agreement dated March 31, 2011 (“Prior Agreement”). There have been no borrowings under the Credit Agreement or the Prior Agreement.

The Credit Agreement does not restrict our ability to pay dividends and contains no financial covenants. The failure to comply with customary conditions or the occurrence of customary events of default contained in the credit agreement would prevent any further borrowings and would generally require the repayment of any outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement. Such events of default include: (a) non-payment of credit agreement debt, interest or fees; (b) non-compliance with the terms of the credit agreement covenants; (c) cross-default to other debt in certain circumstances; (d) bankruptcy or insolvency; and (e) defaults upon obligations under Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Additionally, each of the banks has the right to terminate its commitment to lend additional funds or issue letters of credit under the agreement if any person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 30 percent or more of our voting stock, or, during any 12-month period, individuals who were directors of Honeywell at the beginning of the period cease to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors.

The Credit Agreement has substantially the same material terms and conditions as the Prior Agreement with an improvement in pricing and an extension of maturity. Loans under the Credit Agreement are required to be repaid no later than April 2, 2017, unless such date is extended pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement. We have agreed to pay a facility fee of 0.08 percent per annum on the aggregate commitment.

Revolving credit borrowings under the Credit Agreement would bear interest, at Honeywell's option, (A) (1) at a rate equal to the highest of (a) the floating base rate publicly announced by Citibank, N.A., (b) 0.5% above the Federal funds rate or (c) Libor plus 1.00%, plus (2) a margin based on Honeywell's credit default swap mid-rate spread and subject to a floor and a cap as set forth in the Credit Agreement (the “Applicable Margin”) minus 1.00%, provided such margin shall not be less than zero; or (B) at a rate equal to Libor plus the Applicable Margin; or (C) by a competitive bidding procedure.

The facility fee and the letter of credit issuance fee are subject to change, based upon a grid determined by our long term debt ratings. The Credit Agreement is not subject to termination based upon a decrease in our debt ratings or a material adverse change.

As a source of liquidity, we sell interests in designated pools of trade accounts receivables to third parties. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 none of the receivables in the designated pools had been sold to third parties. When we sell receivables, they are over-collateralized and we retain a subordinated interest in the pool of receivables representing that over-collateralization as well as an undivided interest in the balance of the receivables pools. The terms of the trade accounts receivable program permit the repurchase of receivables from the third parties at our discretion, providing us with an additional source of revolving credit. As a result, program receivables remain on the Company's balance sheet with a corresponding amount recorded as either Short-term borrowings or Long-term debt.

XML

INVENTORIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Inventories [Abstract]

Inventories

Note 8. Inventories

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Raw materials	$	1,222	$	1,222
Work in process		887		958
Finished products		2,432		2,253
		4,541		4,433
Reduction to LIFO cost basis		(199)		(169)
	$	4,342	$	4,264

XML

GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES-NET

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets Net [Abstract]

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net

Note9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - Net

       The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months endedJune 30, 2012 by segment is as follows:

								Currency
		December 31,						Translation		June 30,
		2011		Acquisitions		Divestitures		Adjustment		2012
Aerospace	$	2,095	$	2	$	(3)	$	(2)	$	2,092
Automation and Control
Solutions		8,260		45		-		(58)		8,247
Performance Materials
and Technologies		1,306		-		-		(5)		1,301
Transportation Systems		197		-		-		-		197
	$	11,858	$	47	$	(3)	$	(65)	$	11,837

		June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
		Gross				Net		Gross				Net
		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
		Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amount		Amortization		Amount
Determinable life intangibles:
Patents and technology	$	1,134	$	(796)	$	338	$	1,151	$	(761)	$	390
Customer relationships		1,707		(552)		1,155		1,718		(493)		1,225
Trademarks		156		(92)		64		155		(84)		71
Other		189		(136)		53		211		(145)		66
		3,186		(1,576)		1,610		3,235		(1,483)		1,752
Indefinite life intangibles:
Trademarks		715		-		715		725		-		725
	$	3,901	$	(1,576)	$	2,325	$	3,960	$	(1,483)	$	2,477

Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the six months endedJune 30, 2012 and 2011 was $126and $125 million, respectively.

       We completed our annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles as of March 31, 2012 and determined that there was no impairment as of that date. No matters have arisen subsequent to that date which have resulted in a change to this assessment.

XML

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Financial Instruments And Fair Value Measures [Abstract]

Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures

Note11. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures

Credit and Market Risk—Financial instruments, including derivatives, expose us to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and to market risk related to changes in interest and currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We manage our exposure to counterparty credit risk through specific minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties, and procedures to monitor concentrations of credit risk. Our counterparties in derivative transactions are substantial investment and commercial banks with significant experience using such derivative instruments. We monitor the impact of market risk on the fair value and cash flows of our derivative and other financial instruments considering reasonably possible changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates and commodity prices and restrict the use of derivative financial instruments to hedging activities.

We continually monitor the creditworthiness of our customers to which we grant credit terms in the normal course of business. The terms and conditions of our credit sales are designed to mitigate or eliminate concentrations of credit risk with any single customer. Our sales are not materially dependent on a single customer or a small group of customers.

Foreign Currency Risk Management—We conduct our business on a multinational basis in a wide variety of foreign currencies. Our exposure to market risk for changes in foreign currency exchange rates arises from international financing activities between subsidiaries, foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and transactions arising from international trade. Our objective is to preserve the economic value of non-functional currency denominated cash flows. We attempt to hedge transaction exposures with natural offsets to the fullest extent possible and, once these opportunities have been exhausted, through foreign currency exchange forward and option contracts with third parties.

We hedge monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies. Prior to conversion into U.S. dollars, these assets and liabilities are remeasured at spot exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet date. The effects of changes in spot rates are recognized in earnings and included in Other (Income) Expense. We partially hedge forecasted sales and purchases, which predominantlyoccur in the next twelve months and are denominated in non-functional currencies, with currency forward contracts. Changes in the forecasted non-functional currency cash flows due to movements in exchange rates are substantially offset by changes in the fair value of the currency forward contracts designated as hedges. Market value gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized. Open foreign currency exchange forward contracts mature predominantlyin the next twelve months. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had contracts with notional amounts of $5,870 million and $7,108 million respectively, to exchange foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar, Euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, Indian rupee,Mexican peso, Chinese renminbi,Hong Kong dollar,Czech koruna, Swiss franc, Singapore dollar, Romanian leu, Korean won, Swedish kronaandThai baht.

Commodity Price Risk Management—Our exposure to market risk for commodity prices can result in changes in our cost of production. We primarily mitigate our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of long-term, fixed-price contracts with our suppliers and formula price agreements with suppliers and customers. We also enter into forward commodity contracts with third parties designated as hedges of anticipated purchases of several commodities. Forward commodity contracts are marked-to-market, with the resulting gains and losses recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized.At June 30, 2012and December 31, 2011, we had contracts with notional amounts of $32 millionand $59 million, respectively, related to forward commodity agreements, principally base metals and natural gas.

Interest Rate Risk Management—We use a combination of financial instruments, including long-term, medium-term and short-term financing, variable-rate commercial paper, and interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate mix of our total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing. At June 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011, interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges effectively changed $1,400million of fixed rate debt at an average rate of 4.09 percent to LIBOR based floating rate debt. Our interest rate swaps mature at various dates through 2021.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments— The FASB's accounting guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The FASB's guidance classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or
	Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets
	that are not active, or
	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
Level 3	Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability

The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table sets forth the Company's financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as ofJune 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Assets:
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	28	$	26
Available for sale investments		434		359
Interest rate swap agreements		149		134
Forward commodity contracts		1		1
Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	75	$	52
Forward commodity contracts		6		10

The foreign currency exchange contracts, interest rate swap agreements, and forward commodity contracts are valued using broker quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within level 2. The Company holds investments in marketable equity securities that are designated as available for sale and are valued using quoted market prices. As such, these investments are classified within level 1. The Company also holds investments in commercial paper, certificates of deposits, and time deposits that are designated as available for sale and are valued using market transactions in over-the-counter markets. As such, these investments are classified within level 2.

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts and notes receivables, payables, commercial paper and short-term borrowings contained in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximates fair value. The following table sets forth the Company's financial assets and liabilities that were not carried at fair value:

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Assets
Long-term receivables	$	161	$	159	$	132	$	132
Liabilities
Long-term debt and related current maturities	$	6,962	$	8,107	$	6,896	$	7,896

The Company determined the fair value of the long term receivables by discounting based upon the terms of the receivable and counterparty details including credit quality. As such, the fair value of these receivables is considered level 2. The Company determined the fair value of the long term debt and related current maturities utilizing transactions in the listed markets for identical or similar liabilities. As such, the fair value of the long-term debt and related current maturities is considered level 2 as well.

AtJune 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had nonfinancial assets, specifically property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, with a net book value of $18 million and $262 million, respectively, which were accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets were tested for impairment and based on the fair value of these assets the Company recognized losses of $7 million and $18 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, primarilyin connection with our repositioning actions (see Note 4 Repositioning and Other Charges). The Company has determined that the fair value measurements of these nonfinancial assets are level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The Company utilizes the market, income or cost approaches or a combination of these valuation techniques for its non-recurring level 3 fair value measures. Inputs to such measures include observable market data obtained from independent sources such as broker quotes and recent market transactions for similar assets. It is the Company's policy to maximize the use of observable inputs in the measurement of fair value or non-recurring level 3 measurements. To the extent observable inputs are not available the Company utilizes unobservable inputs based upon the assumptions market participants would use in valuing the asset. Examples of utilized unobservable inputs are future cash flows, long term growth rates and applicable discount rates. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had nonfinancial assets, specifically property, plant and equipment, with a net book value of $15 million and $32 million, respectively, that were accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Based on the fair value of these assets the Company recognized losses of $2 million and $12 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company has determined that the fair value measurements of these nonfinancial assets are level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

The derivatives utilized for risk management purposes as detailed above are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and impacted the Statement of Operations as follows:

Fair value of derivatives classified as assets consist of the following:
			June 30,		December 31,
Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables	$	27	$	18
Interest rate swap agreements	Other assets		149		134
Commodity contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables		1		1
			June 30,		December 31,
Not Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accounts, notes, and other receivables	$	1	$	8
Fair value of derivatives classified as liabilities consist of the following:
			June 30,		December 31,
Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accrued liabilities	$	69	$	50
Commodity contracts	Accrued liabilities		6		10
			June 30,		December 31,
Not Designated as a Hedge	Balance Sheet Classification		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Accrued liabilities	$	6	$	2

Gains (losses) recognized in OCI (effective portions) consist of the following:
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June, 30				June, 30
Designated Cash Flow Hedge		2012		2011		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	(50)	$	8	$	(11)	$	16
Commodity contracts		0		(1)		(9)		2

Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to income consist of the following:
			Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
Designated			June 30,				June 30,
Cash Flow Hedge	Income Statement Location		2012		2011		2012		2011
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Product sales	$	(9)	$	10	$	(6)	$	16
	Cost of products sold		7		(11)		10		(16)
	Sales & general administrative		(3)		4		3		6
Commodity contracts	Cost of products sold	$	(7)	$	1	$	(13)	$	0

Ineffective portions of commodity derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedge relationships were insignificant in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012and 2011and are classifiedwithin cost of products sold.Foreign currency exchange contracts in cash flow hedge relationships qualify as critical matched terms hedge relationships and as a result have no ineffectiveness.

Interest rate swap agreements are designated as hedge relationships with gains or losses on the derivative recognized in Interest and other financial charges offsetting the gains and losses on the underlying debt being hedged. Gains on interest rate swap agreements recognized in earnings were $29and $15 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. Gains on interest rate swap agreements recognized in earnings were $24 million and $33 million in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Gains and losses are fully offset by losses and gains on the underlying debt being hedged.

We also economically hedge our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates principally with forward contracts. These contracts are marked-to-market with the resulting gains and losses recognized in earnings offsetting the gains and losses on the non-functional currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities being hedged. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $61 million and $51 million of expense, respectively, in Other (Income) Expense. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $27 millionand $50 million of income, respectively, in Other (Income) Expense.

XML

REPOSITIONING AND OTHER CHARGES (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012 Employees	Jun. 30, 2011 Employees	Jun. 30, 2012 Employees	Jun. 30, 2011 Employees
Net repositioning and other charges Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Gross repositioning charge	$ 47,000,000	$ 17,000,000	$ 79,000,000	$ 65,000,000
Number of employees severed	559	360	1,177	946
Component Of Operating Other Cost And Expense [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charge	24,000,000	7,000,000	49,000,000	51,000,000
Asbestos related litigation charges, net of insurance	43,000,000	40,000,000	79,000,000	78,000,000
Probable and reasonably estimable environmental liabilities	67,000,000	50,000,000	128,000,000	101,000,000
Other Restructuring Costs	0	(3,000,000)	0	(3,000,000)
Total net repositioning and other charges	134,000,000	94,000,000	256,000,000	227,000,000
Severance Costs [Member]
Component Of Operating Other Cost And Expense [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charge	37,000,000	16,000,000	52,000,000	43,000,000
Asset Impairments [Member]
Component Of Operating Other Cost And Expense [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charge	2,000,000	0	11,000,000	10,000,000
Exit Costs [Member]
Component Of Operating Other Cost And Expense [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charge	8,000,000	1,000,000	16,000,000	12,000,000
Restructuring Reserve Accrual Adjustments [Member]
Component Of Operating Other Cost And Expense [Line Items]
Total net repositioning charge	$ (23,000,000)	$ (10,000,000)	$ (30,000,000)	$ (14,000,000)

XML

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012 United States, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 United States, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 United States, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 United States, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Foreign Pension Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Foreign Pension Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Foreign Pension Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Foreign Pension Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]	Jun. 30, 2011 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]
Defined Benefit Plans Disclosure [Line Items]
Service cost			$ 64,000,000	$ 53,000,000	$ 128,000,000	$ 116,000,000	$ 12,000,000	$ 15,000,000	$ 24,000,000	$ 30,000,000	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 1,000,000
Interest cost			185,000,000	191,000,000	369,000,000	381,000,000	55,000,000	60,000,000	110,000,000	120,000,000	13,000,000	17,000,000	27,000,000	35,000,000
Expected return on plan assets			(255,000,000)	(254,000,000)	(510,000,000)	(507,000,000)	(73,000,000)	(72,000,000)	(145,000,000)	(143,000,000)
Amortization of transition obligation			0	0	0	0	1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)			7,000,000	9,000,000	14,000,000	17,000,000	(1,000,000)	(1,000,000)	(1,000,000)	(1,000,000)	(4,000,000)	(9,000,000)	(7,000,000)	(22,000,000)
Recognition of actuarial losses			0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5,000,000	6,000,000	16,000,000	18,000,000
Settlements and curtailments			0	9,000,000	0	24,000,000	0	1,000,000	2,000,000	1,000,000	(6,000,000)	(61,000,000)	(6,000,000)	(61,000,000)
Net periodic benefit cost			1,000,000	8,000,000	1,000,000	31,000,000	(6,000,000)	4,000,000	(9,000,000)	8,000,000	8,000,000	(47,000,000)	30,000,000	(29,000,000)
Pension And Other Postretirement Disclosure Paragraph Details [Abstract]
Cash contribution to pension plans	$ 267,000,000	$ 256,000,000

XML

REPOSITIONING AND OTHER CHARGES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Repositioning And Other Charges [Abstract]

Repositioning and other charges text block

	A summary of repositioning and other charges follows:
			Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
			June 30,				June 30,
			2012		2011		2012		2011
Severance		$	37	$	16	$	52	$	43
Asset impairments			2		-		11		10
Exit costs			8		1		16		12
Adjustments			(23)		(10)		(30)		(14)
Total net repositioning charge			24		7		49		51
Asbestos related litigation charges,
net of insurance			43		40		79		78
Probable and reasonably estimable
environmental liabilities			67		50		128		101
Other			0		(3)		0		(3)
Total net repositioning and other charges		$	134	$	94	$	256	$	227

Pretax distribution of total net repositioning and other charges by income statement classification

The following table summarizes the pretax distribution of total net repositioning and other charges by income statement classification:
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of products and services sold	$	132	$	84	$	251	$	202
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2		10		5		25
	$	134	$	94	$	256	$	227

Pretax Impact of Total Net Repositioning and Other Charges by Segment

The following table summarizes the pretax impact of total net repositioning and other charges by segment:
		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Aerospace	$	-	$	(6)	$	1	$	(6)
Automation and Control Solutions		10		12		9		45
Performance Materials and Technologies		-		-		14		13
Transportation Systems		60		40		112		76
Corporate		64		48		120		99
	$	134	$	94	$	256	$	227

Total Repositioning Reserves

The following table summarizes the status of our total repositioning reserves:
		Severance		Asset		Exit
		Costs		Impairments		Costs		Total
December 31, 2011	$	353	$	-	$	59	$	412
Charges		52		11		16		79
Usage - cash		(58)		-		(15)		(73)
Usage - noncash		-		(11)		-		(11)
Foreign currency translation		(13)		-		-		(13)
Adjustments		(30)		-		-		(30)
June 30, 2012	$	304	$	-	$	60	$	364

Restructuring and Related Activities, Reportable Segment

					Automation
					and Control		Transportation
2011 Repositioning Actions			Aerospace		Solutions		Systems		Total
Expected exit and disposal costs		$	15	$	15	$	7	$	37
Costs incurred during:
	Year ended December 31, 2011		(1)		-		-		(1)
	Current year-to-date		-		(3)		-		(3)
Remaining exit and disposal costs at
	June 30, 2012	$	14	$	12	$	7	$	33

					Automation
					and Control		Transportation
2010 Repositioning Actions			Aerospace		Solutions		Systems		Total
Expected exit and disposal costs		$	11	$	10	$	2	$	23
Costs incurred during:
	Year ended December 31, 2010		-		-		-		-
	Year ended December 31, 2011		(2)		(3)		(1)		(6)
	Current year-to-date		-		-		(1)		(1)
Remaining exit and disposal costs at
	June 30, 2012	$	9	$	7	$	-	$	16

XML

GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES-NET (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets, Net (Tables) [Abstract]

Carrying amount of goodwill

								Currency
		December 31,						Translation		June 30,
		2011		Acquisitions		Divestitures		Adjustment		2012
Aerospace	$	2,095	$	2	$	(3)	$	(2)	$	2,092
Automation and Control
Solutions		8,260		45		-		(58)		8,247
Performance Materials
and Technologies		1,306		-		-		(5)		1,301
Transportation Systems		197		-		-		-		197
	$	11,858	$	47	$	(3)	$	(65)	$	11,837

Finite lived and Indefinite lived intangible assets

		June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
		Gross				Net		Gross				Net
		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
		Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amount		Amortization		Amount
Determinable life intangibles:
Patents and technology	$	1,134	$	(796)	$	338	$	1,151	$	(761)	$	390
Customer relationships		1,707		(552)		1,155		1,718		(493)		1,225
Trademarks		156		(92)		64		155		(84)		71
Other		189		(136)		53		211		(145)		66
		3,186		(1,576)		1,610		3,235		(1,483)		1,752
Indefinite life intangibles:
Trademarks		715		-		715		725		-		725
	$	3,901	$	(1,576)	$	2,325	$	3,960	$	(1,483)	$	2,477

XML

NONCONTROLLING INTEREST (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Noncontrolling Interest [Abstract]
Balance beginning of period, December 31	$ 96,000,000	$ 121,000,000
Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest	3,000,000	3,000,000
Acquisitions	0	(1,000,000)
Dividends paid	(7,000,000)	(10,000,000)
Other owner changes	(2,000,000)	(1,000,000)
Balance end of period	$ 90,000,000	$ 112,000,000

XML

INVENTORIES (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Inventory Combining Work In Process And Raw Materials Alternative Gross Abstract
Raw materials	$ 1,222	$ 1,222
Work in process	887	958
Finished products	2,432	2,253
Inventory, Gross	4,541	4,433
Reduction to LIFO cost basis	(199)	(169)
Inventories	$ 4,342	$ 4,264

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income attributable to Honeywell	$ 1,725,000,000	$ 1,515,000,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to Honeywell to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	455,000,000	478,000,000
Loss (gain) on sale of nonstrategic businesses and assets	1,000,000	(46,000,000)
Repositioning and other charges	256,000,000	227,000,000
Net payments for repositioning and other charges	(226,000,000)	(207,000,000)
Pension and other postretirement expense	54,000,000	32,000,000
Pension and other postretirement benefit payments	(597,000,000)	(1,082,000,000)
Stock compensation expense	91,000,000	91,000,000
Deferred income taxes	189,000,000	158,000,000
Excess tax benefits from share based payment arrangements	(16,000,000)	(30,000,000)
Other	(104,000,000)	140,000,000
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
Accounts, notes and other receivables	(20,000,000)	(537,000,000)
Inventories	(78,000,000)	(389,000,000)
Other current assets	(15,000,000)	(23,000,000)
Accounts payable	(191,000,000)	260,000,000
Accrued liabilities	(355,000,000)	108,000,000
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,169,000,000	695,000,000
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(352,000,000)	(289,000,000)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment	1,000,000	3,000,000
Increase in investments	(245,000,000)	(229,000,000)
Decrease in investments	158,000,000	176,000,000
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(64,000,000)	(8,000,000)
Proceeds from sales of businesses, net of fees paid	18,000,000	215,000,000
Other	(59,000,000)	58,000,000
Net cash used for investing activities	(543,000,000)	(74,000,000)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in commercial paper	349,000,000	51,000,000
Net increase/(decrease) in short-term borrowings	11,000,000	(2,000,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	116,000,000	200,000,000
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	42,000,000	1,384,000,000
Payments of long-term debt	0	(439,000,000)
Excess tax benefits from share based payment arrangements	16,000,000	30,000,000
Repurchases of common stock	0	(504,000,000)
Cash dividends paid	(582,000,000)	(530,000,000)
Net cash (used for)/provided by financing activities	(48,000,000)	190,000,000
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(55,000,000)	87,000,000
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	523,000,000	898,000,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	3,698,000,000	2,650,000,000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 4,221,000,000	$ 3,548,000,000

XML

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Other Income Expense [Abstract]

Other (income) expense Text Block

Note 5. Other (Income) Expense

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Equity (income)/loss of affiliated companies	$	(14)	$	(14)	$	(24)	$	(23)
Loss/(gain) on sale of non-strategic businesses
and assets		1		(2)		1		(46)
Interest income		(14)		(14)		(28)		(27)
Foreign exchange		3		10		13		18
Other, net		1		(2)		-		27
	$	(23)	$	(22)	$	(38)	$	(51)

Gain on sale of non-strategic businesses and assets in the six months ended June 30, 2011 includes a $41 million pre-tax gain, $25 million net of tax, related to the divestiture of the automotive on-board sensor products business within our Automation and Control Solutions segment.

Other, net in the six months ended June 30, 2011 includes a loss of $29 million resulting from early redemption of debt.

XML

LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Long Term Debt And Credit Agreements Tables [Abstract]

Long-Term Debt and Credit Agreements

		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
4.25% notes due 2013	$	600	$	600
3.875% notes due 2014		600		600
5.40% notes due 2016		400		400
5.30% notes due 2017		400		400
5.30% notes due 2018		900		900
5.00% notes due 2019		900		900
4.25% notes due 2021		800		800
5.375% notes due 2041		600		600
Industrial development bond obligations, floating
rate maturing at various dates through 2037		37		37
6.625% debentures due 2028		216		216
9.065% debentures due 2033		51		51
5.70% notes due 2036		550		550
5.70% notes due 2037		600		600
Other (including capitalized leases), 0.6%-9.5%
maturing at various dates through 2023		308		242
		6,962		6,896
Less: Current portion		620		15
	$	6,342	$	6,881

Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt

The schedule of principal payments on long term debt is as follows:
		June 30, 2012
2012	$	15
2013		637
2014		627
2015		4
2016		455
Thereafter		5,224
		6,962
Less: Current portion		620
	$	6,342

XML

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Other Income Disclosure Nonoperating Abstract
Equity (income)/loss of affiliated companies	$ (14,000,000)	$ (14,000,000)	$ (24,000,000)	$ (23,000,000)
Loss (gain) on sale of non-strategic business and assets	1,000,000	(2,000,000)	1,000,000	(46,000,000)
Interest Income	(14,000,000)	(14,000,000)	(28,000,000)	(27,000,000)
Foreign exchange	3,000,000	10,000,000	13,000,000	18,000,000
Other, Net	1,000,000	(2,000,000)	0	27,000,000
Other (Income) Expense, Total	(23,000,000)	(22,000,000)	(38,000,000)	(51,000,000)
Other Income Paragraph Details [Line Items]
Payments of debt extinguishment costs				(29,000,000)
Automotive Onboard Sensor Products [Member]
Other Income Paragraph Details [Line Items]
Pretax gain on sale of non strategic businesses and assets				41,000,000
Gain on sale of non strategic businesses and assets, Net of tax				$ 25,000,000

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Note15. Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental Matters

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign government requirements relating to the protection of the environment. We believe that, as a general matter, our policies, practices and procedures are properly designed to prevent unreasonable risk of environmental damage and personal injury and that our handling, manufacture, use and disposal of hazardous substances are in accordance with environmental and safety laws and regulations. However, mainly because of past operations and operations of predecessor companies, we, like other companies engaged in similar businesses, have incurred remedial response and voluntary cleanup costs for site contamination and are a party to lawsuits and claims associated with environmental and safety matters, including past production of products containing hazardous substances. Additional lawsuits, claims and costs involving environmental matters are likely to continue to arise in the future.

       With respect to environmental matters involving site contamination, we continually conduct studies, individually or jointly with other potentially responsible parties, to determine the feasibility of various remedial techniques. It is our policy to record appropriate liabilities for environmental matters when remedial efforts or damage claim payments are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are based on our best estimate of the undiscounted future costs required to complete the remedial work. The recorded liabilities are adjusted periodically as remediation efforts progress or as additional technical, regulatory or legal information becomes available. Given the uncertainties regarding the status of laws, regulations, enforcement policies, the impact of other potentially responsible parties, technology and information related to individual sites, we do not believe it is possible to develop an estimate of the range of reasonably possible environmental loss in excess of our recorded liabilities. We expect to fund expenditures for these matters from operating cash flow. The timing of cash expenditures depends on a number of factors, including the timing of remedial investigations and feasibility studies, the timing of litigation and settlements of remediation liability, personal injury and property damage claims, regulatory approval of cleanup projects, remedial techniques to be utilized and agreements with other parties.

The following table summarizes information concerning our recorded liabilities for environmental costs:

December 31, 2011	$	723
Accruals for environmental matters deemed
probable and reasonably estimable		128
Environmental liability payments		(136)
June 30, 2012	$	715

Environmental liabilities are included in the following balance sheet accounts:
			June 30,		December 31,
			2012		2011
	Accrued liabilities	$	302	$	303
	Other liabilities		413		420
		$	715	$	723

Although we do not currently possess sufficient information to reasonably estimate the amounts of liabilities to be recorded upon future completion of studies, litigation or settlements, and neither the timing nor the amount of the ultimate costs associated with environmental matters can be determined, they could be material to our consolidated results of operations or operating cash flows in the periods recognized or paid. However, considering our past experience and existing reserves, we do not expect that these environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.

New Jersey Chrome Sites—The excavation and offsite disposal of approximately one million tons of chromium residue present at a predecessor Honeywell site located in Jersey City, New Jersey, known as Study Area 7, was completed in January 2010. We are also implementing related groundwater remedial actions, and have received the appropriate permits from state and federal agencies for related river sediment work approved by the federal court. Provisions have been made in our financial statements for the estimated cost of these remedies.

The above-referenced site is the most significant of the 21 sites located in Hudson County, New Jersey that are the subject of an Administrative Consent Order (ACO) entered into with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) in 1993 (the “Honeywell ACO Sites”). Remedial investigations and activities consistent with the ACO and other applicable settlement orders have been conducted and are underway at the other Honeywell ACO Sites. In addition, a settlement order was entered by the New Jersey State Superior Court in the third quarter of 2011 resolving litigation brought by the NJDEP against Honeywell and two other companies regarding the investigation and remediation of the remaining sites in the area that allegedly have chromium contamination (known as the Publicly Funded Sites). Under the settlement, Honeywell has accepted responsibility to remediate 24 of the 53 Publicly Funded Sites and will also bear 50 percent of the costs at another 10 Publicly Funded Sites. Honeywell is developing a schedule for the investigation and remediation of these Publicly Funded Sites. We have recorded reserves for the Honeywell ACO Sites and the applicable Publicly Funded Sites where appropriate under the accounting policy described above.

Dundalk Marine Terminal, Baltimore, MD—Chrome residue from legacy chrome plant operations in Baltimore was deposited as fill at the Dundalk Marine Terminal (“DMT”), which is owned and operated by the Maryland Port Administration (“MPA”). Honeywell and the MPA have been sharing costs to investigate and mitigate related environmental issues, and have entered into a cost sharing agreement under which Honeywell will bear 77 percent of the costs of developing and implementing permanent remedies for the DMT facility. In January 2011, the MPA and Honeywell submitted to the Maryland Department of the Environment (“MDE”) a Corrective Measures Alternatives Analysis (“CMAA”) of certain potential remedies for DMT to assist MDE in selection of a final remedy, which has not yet occurred. We expect the MDE to select the final remedy in July 2012. Provision has been made in our financial statements for the CMAA consistent with the accounting policy described above. We have negotiated a Consent Decree with the MPA and MDE with respect to the investigation and remediation of the DMT facility. The Consent Decree is being challenged in federal court by BUILD, a Baltimore community group, together with a local church and two individuals (collectively “BUILD”). In October 2007, the Court dismissed with prejudice BUILD's state law claims and dismissed without prejudice BUILD's RCRA claims regarding neighborhoods near the DMT facility. In August 2008, the Court held a hearing on the Company's motion to dismiss BUILD's remaining claims on the grounds that MDE is diligently prosecuting the investigation and remediation of the DMT. We are awaiting the Court's decision. We do not believe that this matter will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position or operating cash flows. Given the scope and complexity of this project, it is possible that the cost of remediation, when determinable, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations in the periods recognized.

Onondaga Lake, Syracuse, NY—We are implementing a combined dredging/capping remedy of OnondagaLake pursuant to a consent decree approved by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in January 2007. We have accrued for our estimated cost of remediating OnondagaLake based on currently available information and analysis performed by our engineering consultants. Honeywell is also conducting remedial investigations and activities at other sites in Syracuse. We have recorded reserves for these investigations and activities where appropriate under the accounting policy described above.

Honeywell has entered into a cooperative agreement with potential natural resource trustees to assess alleged natural resource damages relating to this site. It is not possible to predict the outcome or duration of this assessment, or the amounts of, or responsibility for, any damages.

Asbestos Matters

Like many other industrial companies, Honeywell is a defendant in personal injury actions related to asbestos. We did not mine or produce asbestos, nor did we make or sell insulation products or other construction materials that have been identified as the primary cause of asbestos related disease in the vast majority of claimants.

Honeywell's predecessors owned North American Refractories Company (NARCO) from 1979 to 1986. NARCO produced refractory products (bricks and cement used in high temperature applications). We sold the NARCO business in 1986 and agreed to indemnify NARCO with respect to personal injury claims for products that had been discontinued prior to the sale (as defined in the sale agreement). NARCO retained all liability for all other claims. NARCO and/or Honeywell are defendants in asbestos personal injury cases asserting claims based upon alleged exposure to NARCO asbestos-containing products. Claimants consist largely of individuals who allege exposure to NARCO asbestos-containing refractory products in an occupational setting. These claims, and the filing of subsequent claims, have been stayed continuously since January 4, 2002, the date on which NARCO sought bankruptcy protection (see discussion below).

Honeywell's Bendix friction materials (Bendix) business manufactured automotive brake parts that contained chrysotile asbestos in an encapsulated form. Claimants consist largely of individuals who allege exposure to asbestos from brakes from either performing or being in the vicinity of individuals who performed brake replacements.

The following tables summarize information concerning NARCO and Bendix asbestos related balances:

Asbestos Related Liabilities
		Bendix		NARCO		Total
December 31, 2011	$	613	$	1,123	$	1,736
Accrual for update to estimated liability		103		(1)		102
Asbestos related liability payments		(76)		(1)		(77)
June 30, 2012	$	640	$	1,121	$	1,761

Insurance Recoveries for Asbestos Related Liabilities
		Bendix		NARCO		Total
December 31, 2011	$	162	$	618	$	780
Probable insurance recoveries related to
estimated liability		10		-		10
Insurance receivables settlements		5		8		13
Insurance receipts for asbestos related liabilities		(24)		(36)		(60)
June 30, 2012	$	153	$	590	$	743

NARCO and Bendix asbestos related balances are included in the following balance sheet accounts:
		June 30,		December 31,
		2012		2011
Other current assets	$	71	$	71
Insurance recoveries for asbestos related liabilities		672		709
	$	743	$	780
Accrued liabilities	$	239	$	237
Asbestos related liabilities		1,522		1,499
	$	1,761	$	1,736

NARCO Products – On January 4, 2002, NARCO filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In connection with the filing of NARCO's petition in 2002, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (“the Bankruptcy Court”) issued an injunction staying the prosecution of NARCO-related asbestos claims against the Company, which stay has continuously remained in place. In November 2007, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed NARCO's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization (NARCO Plan of Reorganization). All challenges to the NARCO Plan of Reorganization were fully resolved in the third quarter of 2010. The NARCO Plan of Reorganization cannot become effective, however, until the Plan of Reorganization of certain NARCO affiliates, which is pending in Bankruptcy Court, is confirmed and then affirmed by the District Court. It is not possible to predict the timing or outcome of the Bankruptcy and District Court proceedings in the affiliates' case. We expect that the stay enjoining litigation against NARCO and Honeywell will remain in effect until the effective date of the NARCO Plan of Reorganization.

In connection with NARCO's bankruptcy filing, we agreed to certain obligations which will be triggered upon the effective date of the NARCO Plan of Reorganization. Honeywell will provide NARCO with $20 million in financing and simultaneously forgive such indebtedness. We will also pay $40 million to NARCO's former parent company and $16 million to certain asbestos claimants whose claims were resolved during the pendency of the NARCO bankruptcy proceedings. These amounts have been classified as Accrued Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2012.

When the NARCO Plan of Reorganization becomes effective, in connection with its implementation, a federally authorized 524(g) trust (“NARCO Trust”) will be established for the evaluation and resolution of all existing and future NARCO asbestos claims. When the NARCO Trust is established, both Honeywell and NARCO will be entitled to a permanent channeling injunction barring all present and future individual actions in state or federal courts and requiring all asbestos related claims based on exposure to NARCO products to be made against the Trust. The NARCO Trust will review submitted claims and determine award amounts in accordance with established Trust Distribution Procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court which set forth all criteria claimants must meet to qualify for compensation including, among other things, exposure and medical criteria that determine the award amount.

Once the NARCO Trust is established and operational, Honeywell will be obligated to fund NARCO asbestos claims submitted to the trust which qualify for payment under the Trust Distribution Procedures, subject to annual caps up to $150 million in any year, provided, however, that the first $100 million of claims processed through the NARCO Trust (the “Initial Claims Amount”) will not count against the first year annual cap and any unused portion of the Initial Claims Amount will roll over to subsequent years until fully utilized.

Once the NARCO Trust is established and operational, Honeywell will also be responsible for the following funding obligations which are not subject to the annual cap described above: a) previously approved payments due to claimants pursuant to settlement agreements reached during the pendency of the NARCO bankruptcy proceedings which provide that a portion of these settlements is to be paid by the NARCO Trust, which amounts are estimated at $130 million and are expected to be paid during the first year of trust operations and, b) payments due to claimants pursuant to settlement agreements reached during the pendency of the NARCO bankruptcy proceedings that provide for the right to submit claims to the NARCO Trust subject to qualification under the terms of the settlement agreements and Trust Distribution Procedures criteria, which amounts are estimated at $150 million and are expected to be paid during the first two years of trust operations.

Our consolidated financial statements reflect an estimated liability for the amounts discussed above, unsettled claims pending as of the time NARCO filed for bankruptcy protection and for the estimated value of future NARCO asbestos claims expected to be asserted against the NARCO Trust through 2018. In light of the uncertainties inherent in making long-term projections and in connection with the initial operation of a 524(g) trust, as well as the stay of all NARCO asbestos claims since January 2002, we do not believe that we have a reasonable basis for estimating NARCO asbestos claims beyond 2018. In the absence of actual trust experience on which to base the estimate, Honeywell projected the probable value, including trust claim handling costs, of asbestos related future liabilities based on Company specific and general asbestos claims filing rates, expected rates of disease and anticipated claim values. Specifically, the valuation methodology included an analysis of the population likely to have been exposed to asbestos containing products, epidemiological studies estimating the number of people likely to develop asbestos related diseases, NARCO asbestos claims filing history, general asbestos claims filing rates in the tort system and in certain operating asbestos trusts, and the claims experience in those forums, the pending inventory of NARCO asbestos claims, disease criteria and payment values contained in the Trust Distribution Procedures and an estimated approval rate of claims submitted to the NARCO Trust. This methodology used to estimate the liability for future claims has been commonly accepted by numerous bankruptcy courts addressing 524(g) trusts and resulted in a range of estimated liability for future claims of $743 to $961 million. We believe that no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount and accordingly, we have recorded the minimum amount in the range.

Our insurance receivable corresponding to the estimated liability for pending and future NARCO asbestos claims reflects coverage which reimburses Honeywell for portions of NARCO-related indemnity and defense costs and is provided by a large number of insurance policies written by dozens of insurance companies in both the domestic insurance market and the London excess market. At June 30, 2012, a significant portion of this coverage is with insurance companies with whom we have agreements to pay full policy limits. We conduct analyses to determine the amount of insurance that we estimate is probable of recovery in relation to payment of current and estimated future claims. While the substantial majority of our insurance carriers are solvent, some of our individual carriers are insolvent, which has been considered in our analysis of probable recoveries. We made judgments concerning insurance coverage that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our historical dealings with our insurers, our knowledge of any pertinent solvency issues surrounding insurers and various judicial determinations relevant to our insurance programs.

In 2006, Travelers Casualty and Insurance Company (“Travelers”) filed a declaratory judgment action in the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York against Honeywell and other insurance carriers that provide coverage for NARCO asbestos claims, seeking a declaration regarding coverage obligations for NARCO asbestos claims under high excess insurance coverage issued by Travelers and the other insurance carriers. The other insurance carriers asserted cross claims against Honeywell seeking declarations regarding their coverage obligations for NARCO asbestos claims under high excess insurance coverage issued by them. Since then, the Company has entered into settlement agreements resolving all NARCO-related asbestos coverage issues with certain of these insurance carriers, including Travelers. Approximately $48 million of remaining unsettled coverage is included in our NARCO-related insurance receivable at June 30, 2012. Honeywell believes it is entitled to the coverage at issue and expects to prevail in this matter. In 2007, Honeywell prevailed on a critical choice of law issue concerning the appropriate method of allocating NARCO-related asbestos liabilities to triggered policies. The plaintiffs appealed and the trial court's ruling was upheld by the intermediate appellate court in 2009. Plaintiffs' further appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in New York, was denied in October 2009. A related New Jersey action brought by Honeywell has been dismissed, but all coverage claims against plaintiffs have been preserved in the New York action. Based upon (i) our understanding of relevant facts and applicable law, (ii) the terms of insurance policies at issue, (iii) our experience on matters of this nature, and (iv) the advice of counsel, we believe that the amount due from the remaining insurance carriers is probable of recovery. While Honeywell expects to prevail in this matter, an adverse outcome could have a material impact on our results of operations in the period recognized but would not be material to our consolidated financial position or operating cash flows.

Projecting future events is subject to many uncertainties that could cause the NARCO related asbestos liabilities or assets to be higher or lower than those projected and recorded. There is no assurance that the plan of reorganization will become final, that insurance recoveries will be timely or whether there will be any NARCO related asbestos claims beyond 2018. Given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future events, we review our estimates periodically, and update them based on our experience and other relevant factors. Similarly, we will reevaluate our projections concerning our probable insurance recoveries in light of any changes to the projected liability or other developments that may impact insurance recoveries.

Friction Products—The following tables present information regarding Bendix related asbestos claims activity:

	Six Months Ended		Year Ended
		June 30,	December 31,
Claims Activity		2012	2011	2010
Claims Unresolved at the beginning of period		22,571	22,480	19,940
Claims Filed during the period (a)		1,731	3,592	4,302
Claims Resolved during the period(b)		(1,433)	(3,501)	(1,762)
Claims Unresolved at the end of period		22,869	22,571	22,480
(a) The number of claims filed in 2010 includes approximately 1,541 non-malignant claims (with an accrued liability of approximately $575 thousand in the aggregate), a majority of which had previously been dismissed in Mississippi and re-filed in Arkansas.
(b) The number of claims resolved in 2011 includes approximately 351 claims previously classified as inactive (82% non-malignant and accrued liability of approximately $1.7 million) which were activated during 2011. The number of claims resolved in 2010 includes approximately 1,300 claims previously classified as inactive (95% non-malignant and accrued liability of approximately $2.0 million) which were activated during 2010.

Disease Distribution of Unresolved Claims	June 30,	December 31,
	2012	2011	2010
Mesothelioma and Other Cancer Claims	5,334	4,943	4,856
Nonmalignant Claims	17,535	17,628	17,624
Total Claims	22,869	22,571	22,480

	Honeywell has experienced average resolution values per claim excluding legal costs as follows:
			Year Ended December 31,
			2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
			(in whole dollars)
Malignant claims		$	48,000	$	54,000	$	50,000	$	65,000	$	33,000
Nonmalignant claims		$	1,000	$	1,300	$	200	$	1,500	$	500

It is not possible to predict whether resolution values for Bendix related asbestos claims will increase, decrease or stabilize in the future.

Our consolidated financial statements reflect an estimated liability for resolution of pending (claims actually filed as of the financial statement date) and future Bendix related asbestos claims. We have valued Bendix pending and future claims using average resolution values for the previous five years. We update the resolution values used to estimate the cost of Bendix pending and future claims during the fourth quarter each year.

The liability for future claims represents the estimated value of future asbestos related bodily injury claims expected to be asserted against Bendix over the next five years. Such estimated cost of future Bendix related asbestos claims is based on historic claims filing experience and dismissal rates, disease classifications, and resolution values in the tort system for the previous five years. In light of the uncertainties inherent in making long-term projections, as well as certain factors unique to friction product asbestos claims, we do not believe that we have a reasonable basis for estimating asbestos claims beyond the next five years. The methodology used to estimate the liability for future claims is similar to that used to estimate the future NARCO related asbestos claims liability.

Our insurance receivable corresponding to the liability for settlement of pending and future Bendix asbestos claims reflects coverage which is provided by a large number of insurance policies written by dozens of insurance companies in both the domestic insurance market and the London excess market. Based on our ongoing analysis of the probable insurance recovery, insurance receivables are recorded in the financial statements simultaneous with the recording of the estimated liability for the underlying asbestos claims. This determination is based on our analysis of the underlying insurance policies, our historical experience with our insurers, our ongoing review of the solvency of our insurers, our interpretation of judicial determinations relevant to our insurance programs, and our consideration of the impacts of any settlements reached with our insurers. Insurance receivables are also recorded when structured insurance settlements provide for future fixed payment streams that are not contingent upon future claims or other events. Such amounts are recorded at the net present value of the fixed payment stream.

On a cumulative historical basis, Honeywell has recorded insurance receivables equal to approximately 40 percent of the value of the underlying asbestos claims recorded. However, because there are gaps in our coverage due to insurance company insolvencies, certain uninsured periods, and insurance settlements, this rate is expected to decline for any future Bendix related asbestos liabilities that may be recorded. Future recoverability rates may also be impacted by numerous other factors, such as future insurance settlements, insolvencies and judicial determinations relevant to our coverage program, which are difficult to predict. Assuming continued defense and indemnity spending at current levels, we estimate that the cumulative recoverability rate could decline over the next five years to approximately 33 percent.

Honeywell believes it has sufficient insurance coverage and reserves to cover all pending Bendix related asbestos claims and Bendix related asbestos claims estimated to be filed within the next five years. Although it is impossible to predict the outcome of either pending or future Bendix related asbestos claims, we do not believe that such claims would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position in light of our insurance coverage and our prior experience in resolving such claims. If the rate and types of claims filed, the average resolution value of such claims and the period of time over which claim settlements are paid (collectively, the “Variable Claims Factors”) do not substantially change, Honeywell would not expect future Bendix related asbestos claims to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or operating cash flows in any fiscal year. No assurances can be given, however, that the Variable Claims Factors will not change.

Other Matters

We are subject to a number of other lawsuits, investigations and disputes (some of which involve substantial amounts claimed) arising out of the conduct of our business, including matters relating to commercial transactions, government contracts, product liability, prior acquisitions and divestitures, employee benefit plans, intellectual property, and environmental, health and safety matters. We recognize a liability for any contingency that is probable of occurrence and reasonably estimable. We continually assess the likelihood of adverse judgments of outcomes in these matters, as well as potential ranges of possible losses (taking into consideration any insurance recoveries), based on a careful analysis of each matter with the assistance of outside legal counsel and, if applicable, other experts. Included in these other matters are the following:

Allen, et al. v. Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan—Pursuant to a settlement approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona in February 2008, 18 of 21 claims alleged by plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit were dismissed with prejudice in exchange for approximately $35 million (paid from the Company's pension plan) and the maximum aggregate liability for the remaining three claims (alleging that Honeywell impermissibly reduced the pension benefits of certain employees of a predecessor entity when the plan was amended in 1983 and failed to calculate benefits in accordance with the terms of the plan) was capped at $500 million. In October 2009, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan with respect to the claim regarding the calculation of benefits. In May 2011, the parties engaged in mediation and reached an agreement in principle to settle the three remaining claims for $23.8 million (also to be paid from the Company's pension plan). Settlement documents have been submitted to the court for classwide approval. A preliminary settlement order has been approved by the court and a fairness hearing on the settlement is scheduled for July 20, 2012. Upon court approval of the settlement, all claims in this matter will be fully resolved.

Quick Lube—On March 31, 2008, S&E Quick Lube, a filter distributor, filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging that twelve filter manufacturers, including Honeywell, engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices, rig bids and allocate U.S. customers for aftermarket automotive filters. This suit is a purported class action on behalf of direct purchasers of filters from the defendants. Parallel purported class actions, including on behalf of indirect purchasers of filters, have been filed by other plaintiffs in a variety of jurisdictions in the United States and Canada. The U.S cases have been consolidated into a single multi-district litigation in the Northern District of Illinois. In June 2011, plaintiff's principal witness pled guilty to a felony count of having made false statements to federal investigators. On March 8, 2012, Honeywell entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the multi-district litigation class action as to all plaintiffs, subject to approval by the court. The settlement did not and will not have a material impact on our results of operations or operating cash flows in the periods recognized or paid. As previously reported, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice notified Honeywell in January 2010 that it had officially closed its investigation into possible collusion in the replacement auto filters industry.

Honeywell v. United Auto Workers (“UAW”) et. al—In July 2011, Honeywell filed an action in federal court (District of New Jersey) against the UAW and all former employees who retired under a series of Master Collective Bargaining Agreements (“MCBAs”) between Honeywell and the UAW.  The Company is seeking a declaratory judgment that certain express limitations on its obligation to contribute toward the healthcare coverage of such retirees (the “CAPS”) set forth in the MCBAs may be implemented, effective January 1, 2012.  In September 2011, the UAW and certain retiree defendants filed a motion to dismiss the New Jersey action and filed suit in the Eastern District of Michigan alleging that the MCBAs do not provide for CAPS on the Company's liability for healthcare coverage.  The UAW and retiree plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion for class certification and a motion for partial summary judgment in the Michigan action, seeking a ruling that retirees who retired prior to the initial inclusion of the CAPS in the 2003 MCBA are not covered by the CAPS as a matter of law.  In December 2011, the New Jersey action was dismissed on forum grounds.  Honeywell has appealed the New Jersey court's dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In the meantime, Honeywell has answered the UAW's complaint in Michigan and has asserted a counterclaim for fraudulent inducement. Honeywell is confident that the CAPS will be upheld and that its liability for healthcare coverage premiums with respect to the putative class will be limited as negotiated and expressly set forth in the applicable MCBAs.  In the event of an adverse ruling, however, Honeywell's other postretirement benefits for pre-2003 retirees would increase by approximately $150 million, reflecting the estimated value of these CAPS.

Given the uncertainty inherent in litigation and investigations (including the specific matters referenced above), we do not believe it is possible to develop estimates of reasonably possible loss in excess of current accruals for these matters (other than as specifically set forth above). Considering our past experience and existing accruals, we do not expect the outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position. Because most contingencies are resolved over long periods of time, potential liabilities are subject to change due to new developments, changes in settlement strategy or the impact of evidentiary requirements, which could cause us to pay damage awards or settlements (or become subject to equitable remedies) that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or operating cash flows in the periods recognized or paid.