EX-99.77B ACCT LTTR

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Trustees and Shareholders of Columbia Funds Series Trust I

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of Columbia
High Yield Municipal Fund and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (each a series of
Columbia Funds Series Trust I and hereafter collectively referred to as the
"Funds") as of and for the year ended June 30, 2011, in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), we
considered the Funds' internal control over financial reporting, including
controls over safeguarding securities, as a basis for designing our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements
and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds' internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Funds' internal control over financial reporting.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting. In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls. A fund's internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A fund's internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of
records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the fund; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the fund are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and trustees of the fund; and
(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of a fund's assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design
or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect
misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the
Funds' annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis.

Our consideration of the Funds' internal control over financial reporting was
for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph and would not
necessarily disclose all deficiencies in internal control over financial
reporting that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). However, we noted no
deficiencies in the Funds' internal control over financial reporting and its
operation, including controls over safeguarding securities, that we consider to
be material weaknesses as defined above as of June 30, 2011.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management and the
Board of Trustees of the Funds and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
August 22, 2011

EX-99.77C VOTES

                                                                     Exhibit 77C
ITEM 77C - MATTERS SUBMITTED TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS:

COLUMBIA HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND

At a Joint Special Meeting of Shareholders held on February 15, 2011,
shareholders of the Fund considered a proposal to approve a proposed amendment
to the Investment Management Services Agreement with Columbia Management
Investment Advisers, LLC. The proposal was approved as follows:



VOTES FOR                       VOTES AGAINST                ABSTENTIONS                  BROKER NON-VOTES
---------                       -------------                -----------                  ----------------
                                                                                 
597,744,180                     8,967,254                    3,793,846                    0

EX-99.77E LEGAL

                                                                     EXHIBIT 77E

ITEM 77E - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express
Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc. was filed in the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege
that they are investors in several American Express Company mutual funds
(branded as Columbia or RiverSource) and they purport to bring the action
derivatively on behalf of those funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The plaintiffs allege that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds
for investment advisory and administrative services are excessive. The
plaintiffs seek remedies including restitution and rescission of investment
advisory and distribution agreements. The plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to
transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of
Minnesota (the District Court). In response to defendants' motion to dismiss the
complaint, the District Court dismissed one of plaintiffs' four claims and
granted plaintiffs limited discovery. Defendants moved for summary judgment in
April 2007. Summary judgment was granted in the defendants' favor on July 9,
2007. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of
Appeals (the Eighth Circuit) on August 8, 2007. On April 8, 2009, the Eighth
Circuit reversed summary judgment and remanded to the District Court for further
proceedings. On August 6, 2009, defendants filed a writ of certiorari with the
U.S. Supreme Court (the Supreme Court), asking the Supreme Court to stay the
District Court proceedings while the Supreme Court considers and rules in a case
captioned Jones v. Harris Associates, which involves issues of law similar to
those presented in the Gallus case. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued
its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme
Court vacated the Eighth Circuit's decision in the Gallus case and remanded the
case to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme
Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On June 4, 2010, the Eighth
Circuit remanded the Gallus case to the District Court for further consideration
in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On
December 9, 2010, the District Court reinstated its July 9, 2007 summary
judgment order in favor of the defendants. On January 10, 2011, plaintiffs filed
a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit. In response to the plaintiffs'
opening appellate brief filed on March 18, 2011, the defendants filed a response
brief on May 4, 2011 with the Eighth Circuit. The plaintiffs filed a reply brief
on May 26, 2011.

In December 2005, without admitting or denying the allegations, American Express
Financial Corporation (AEFC, which is now known as Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
(Ameriprise Financial)), entered into settlement agreements with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Minnesota Department of Commerce (MDOC)
related to market timing activities. As a result, AEFC was censured and ordered
to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of certain
provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of
1940, and various Minnesota laws. AEFC agreed to pay disgorgement of $10 million
and civil money penalties of $7 million. AEFC also agreed to retain an
independent distribution consultant to assist in developing a plan for
distribution of all disgorgement and civil penalties ordered by the SEC in
accordance with various undertakings detailed at www.sec.gov/
litigation/admin/ia-2451.pdf. Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have
cooperated with the SEC and the MDOC in these legal proceedings, and have made
regular reports to the funds' Boards of Directors/Trustees.

Ameriprise Financial and certain of its affiliates have historically been
involved in a number of legal, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including
routine litigation, class actions, and governmental actions, concerning matters
arising in connection with the conduct of their business activities. Ameriprise
Financial believes that the Funds are not currently the subject of, and that
neither Ameriprise Financial nor any of its affiliates are the subject of, any
pending legal, arbitration or regulatory proceedings that are likely to have a
material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or
its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds. Ameriprise
Financial is required to make 10-Q, 10-K and, as necessary, 8-K filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on legal and regulatory matters that relate
to Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. Copies of these filings may be
obtained by accessing the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

There can be no assurance that these matters, or the adverse publicity
associated with them, will not result in increased fund redemptions, reduced
sale of fund shares or other adverse consequences to the Funds. Further,
although we believe proceedings are not likely to have a material adverse effect
on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform
under their contracts with the Funds, these proceedings are subject to
uncertainties and, as such, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range
of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings
could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief
that could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
condition or results of operations of Ameriprise Financial.

EX-99.77M MERGERS

                                                                     EXHIBIT 77M

ITEM 77M/77Q1(g) - MERGERS:

Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (the "Acquiring Fund") became the surviving
entity in a reorganization with RiverSource Disciplined Small Cap Value Fund, a
series of RiverSource Dimensions Series, Inc. (the "Acquired Fund").

In September 2010, the Board of Trustees of Columbia Funds Series Trust I and
the Board of Directors of RiverSource Dimensions Series, Inc. each approved an
agreement and plan of reorganization (the "Agreement and Plan") providing for
the sale of all of the assets of the Acquired Fund to, and the assumption of all
of the liabilities and obligations of the Acquired Fund by, the Acquiring Fund,
in complete liquidation of the Acquired Fund. At a meeting of shareholders held
on February 15, 2011, shareholders of the Acquired Fund approved the Agreement
and Plan with respect to the applicable Reorganization.

Effective on June 3, 2011, the Acquiring Fund acquired all the assets of, and
assumed all the liabilities and obligations of, the Acquired Fund, in complete
liquidation of the Acquired Fund. Shareholders of each class of shares of the
Acquired Fund received shares of the corresponding share class of the Acquiring
Fund in accordance with the Agreement and Plan.

The registration statement of Columbia Funds Series Trust I on Form N-14, which
was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2011
(accession no. 0001193125-11-194672), is incorporated by reference, including
without limitation the Agreement and Plan filed as Exhibit (4) to the
registration statement and the applicable prospectus/proxy statement describing
the applicable Reorganization, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 28, 2010 (accession no. 0001193125-10-289274).