Columbia Funds Series Trust I - Annual N-SAR report for the
period ending 4/30/09

Columbia Core Bond Fund
(the "Fund")


77B Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees and Shareholders of Columbia Funds Series Trust I

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of Columbia Core Bond Fund (a series of Columbia Funds Series Trust
 I and hereafter referred to as the "Fund") as of and for the year
ended April 30, 2009, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), we considered the
Fund's internal control over financial reporting, including controls
over safeguarding securities, as a basis for designing our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial
statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Fund's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal
control over financial reporting.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.  In
fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management
are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
controls.  A fund's internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.  A fund's internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
fund; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded
as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the fund are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and trustees of the fund; and (3)  provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of a fund's assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when
the design or operation of a control does not allow management or
employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions,
to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.  A material
weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of the Fund's annual or
interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis.

Our consideration of the Fund's internal control over financial
reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph and would not necessarily disclose all deficiencies in
internal control over financial reporting that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  However, we noted no
deficiencies in the Fund's internal control over financial reporting
and its operation, including controls over safeguarding securities,
that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
April 30, 2009.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and should not be
used by anyone other than these specified parties.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 19, 2009


Item 77E - Legal Proceedings Note:
Columbia Atlantic Funds					June 2009

Columbia Management Advisors, LLC and Columbia Management Distributors,
Inc. (collectively, the "Columbia Group") are subject to a settlement
agreement with the New York Attorney General ("NYAG") (the "NYAG
Settlement") and a settlement order with the SEC (the "SEC Order") on
matters relating to mutual fund trading, each dated February 9, 2005.
Under the terms of the SEC Order, the Columbia Group (or predecessor
entities) agreed, among other things, to: pay disgorgement and civil
money penalties collectively totaling $140 million; cease and desist
from violations of the antifraud provisions and certain other
provisions of the federal securities laws; maintain certain compliance
and ethics oversight structures; and retain an independent consultant
to review the Columbia Group's applicable supervisory, compliance,
control and other policies and procedures. The NYAG Settlement, among
other things, requires Columbia Management Advisors, LLC and its
affiliates to reduce management fees for certain funds in the Columbia
family of mutual funds in a projected total of $160 million over five
years through November 30, 2009 and to make certain disclosures to
investors relating to expenses.  In connection with the Columbia Group
providing services to the Columbia Funds, the Columbia Funds have
voluntarily undertaken to implement certain governance measures designed
to maintain the independence of their boards of trustees and certain
special consulting and compliance measures.

Pursuant to the SEC Order and related procedures, the $140 million in
settlement amounts described above has been substantially distributed in
accordance with a distribution plan that was developed by an independent
distribution consultant and approved by the SEC on April 6, 2007.

In connection with the events described above, various parties have filed
suit against certain funds, the Trustees of the Columbia Funds,
FleetBoston Financial Corporation and its affiliated entities and/or Bank
of America and its affiliated entities.

On February 20, 2004, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
transferred these cases and cases against other mutual fund companies
based on similar allegations to the United States District Court in
Maryland for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings (the
''MDL''). Subsequently, additional related cases were transferred to the
MDL. On September 29, 2004, the plaintiffs in the MDL filed amended and
consolidated complaints. One of these amended complaints is a putative
class action that includes claims under the federal securities laws and
state common law, and that names Columbia Management Advisors, Inc.
(which has since merged into Banc of America Capital Management, LLC
(now named Columbia Management Advisors, LLC))  ("Columbia"), Columbia
Funds Distributor, Inc. (now named Columbia Management Distributors,
Inc.) (the "Distributor"), the Trustees of the Columbia Funds, Bank of
America Corporation and others as defendants. Another of the amended
complaints is a derivative action purportedly on behalf of the Columbia
Funds that asserts claims under federal securities laws and state
common law.

On February 25, 2005, Columbia and other defendants filed motions to
dismiss the claims in the pending cases.  On March 1, 2006, for reasons
stated in the court's memoranda dated November 3, 2005, the United States
District Court for the District of Maryland granted in part and denied
in part the defendants' motions to dismiss.  The court dismissed all of
the class action claims pending against the Columbia Funds Trusts.  As
to Columbia and the Distributor, the claims under the Securities Act of
1933, the claims under Sections 34(b) and 36(a) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 ("ICA") and the state law claims were dismissed.  The claims
under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
claims under Section 36(b) of the ICA were not dismissed.

On March 21, 2005, a purported class action was filed in Massachusetts
state court alleging that certain conduct, including market timing,
entitled Class B shareholders in certain Columbia Funds to an exemption
from contingent deferred sales charges upon early redemption (the "CDSC
Lawsuit"). The CDSC Lawsuit was removed to federal court in Massachusetts
and transferred to the MDL.

On September 14, 2007, the plaintiffs and the Columbia defendants named
in the MDL, including the Columbia Funds, entered into a stipulation of
settlement with respect to all Columbia-related claims in the MDL
described above, including the CDSC Lawsuit.  The settlement is subject
to court approval.


Item 77I/77Q1(d) - Terms of new or amended securities:

On April 21, 2009, a Form Type 497, Accession No. 0001193125-09-083277,
a supplement to the registration statement of Columbia Funds Series
Trust I was filed with the SEC. This supplement discloses that, effective
June 22, 2009 (the "Closing Date"), Class B shares of the Fund will be
closed to purchase activity, with the exception of dividend reinvestment
and exchanges from existing investors in the Fund's Class B shares as
outlined below:

Effective on or about June 22, 2009 (the "Closing Date"), the Funds will
no longer accept investments in Class B shares from new or existing
investors, except from existing investors through Qualifying Transactions
(as defined below).  Shareholders with investments in Class B shares as
of the Closing Date may continue to hold such shares until they convert
to Class A shares.  All Class B share characteristics, including the
Rule 12b-1 distribution and service fees, contingent deferred sales
charge (CDSC) schedule and conversion feature, remain unchanged.

On and after the Closing Date, the Funds will only offer Class B shares
to existing investors and only through the following two types of
transactions (collectively, "Qualifying Transactions"):

1.	Dividends and/or capital gain distributions may continue to be
reinvested in Class B shares of the same Fund.

2.	Shareholders invested in Class B shares of a Fund may exchange
those shares for Class B shares of other Funds offering such shares.

Any initial purchase request for a Fund's Class B shares will be rejected
(other than through a Qualifying Transaction that is an exchange
transaction).

Except for Qualifying Transactions and as described in the following
paragraph, on and after the Closing Date, a Fund will treat any
additional purchase requests for the Fund's Class B shares by an existing
Class B shareholder, including those made through an active systematic
investment plan or payroll deduction plan, to be purchase requests for
Class A shares, without regard to the normal investment minimum for Class
A shares.  These investments will be subject to any applicable sales load
for Class A shares.  As described in a Fund's prospectus, for purposes of
determining the applicable sales load, the value of an investor's account
will be deemed to include the value of all applicable shares in eligible
accounts, including a Class B share account. See the section within a
Fund's prospectus entitled Choosing a Share Class - Class A Shares -
Front-end Sales Charge for additional information.  Investors should also
consult their financial advisors for more information regarding Class A
shares of the Fund.

Additional purchase requests for a Fund's Class B shares by an existing
Class B shareholder, submitted by such shareholder's financial
intermediary through the National Securities Clearing Corporation (the
"NSCC"), will be rejected due to operational limitations of the NSCC.
Investors should consult their financial advisor if they wish to invest
in a Fund by purchasing a share class of the Fund other than Class B
shares.