Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Dec. 20, 2022	Mar. 19, 2022	Feb. 15, 2021
Maiden Biosciences Inc [Member]
Collaborative Arrangement and Arrangement Other than Collaborative [Line Items]
Loss contingency allegations			This lawsuit relates to two promissory notes executed by RBC in the 4th quarter of 2019 in favor of Decentralized and HWH, totaling approximately $1,000,000. Maiden, a 2020 default judgment creditor of RBC, in the principal amount of $4,329,000, now complains about those notes, the funding of those notes, the subsequent default of those notes by RBC, and HWH and Decentralized’s subsequent Article 9 foreclosure or deed-in-lieu debt conveyances. In the instant lawsuit, Maiden first asserted claims against Defendants for unjust enrichment, fraudulent transfer under the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“TUFTA”), and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). Maiden also sought a judgment from the court declaring: “(1) Defendants lacked a valid security interest in RBC and RBC Subsidiaries’ assets and therefore lacked the authority to sell the assets during the public foreclosure sale; (2) Defendant Heuszel’s low bid at the public foreclosure sale was invalid and void; (3) the public foreclosure sale was conducted in a commercially unreasonable manner; and (4) Defendants do not have the legal authority to transfer RBC and RBC’s Subsidiaries assets to Heuszel and HWH.” Maiden sought to recover from Defendants: (1) treble damages or, alternatively, damages in the amount of their underlying judgment plus the other creditors’ claims or the value of the assets transferred, whichever is less, plus punitive or exemplary damages; (2) pre- and post-judgment interest; and (3) attorneys’ fees and cost
License Agreement [Member]
Collaborative Arrangement and Arrangement Other than Collaborative [Line Items]
Sale of royalty percentage		5.50%
Development cost, percent		50.00%
Development costs		$ 1,250,000
License Agreement [Member] | Bio Medical [Member]
Collaborative Arrangement and Arrangement Other than Collaborative [Line Items]
Loss contingency allegations	(1) the evidence does not support Maiden’s claim against the Company; (2) recovery of exemplary damages under TUFTA is unsupported; and (3) the evidence established that the DSS Defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor on their affirmative defenses. After the DSS Defendants filed their post-judgment motions, the case was settled for $8.75 million, the Court’s December 20, 2022 judgment was vacated, and the case was dismissed with prejudice	In exchange, the Licensee shall pay the Company a royalty of 5.5% of net sales. Under the terms of the Equivir Agreement, the Company shall reimburse the Licensee for 50% of the development costs provided that the development costs shall not exceed $1,250,000. As of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, $200,000 and $0, respectively, has been accrued for in relation to the Equivir License as development of the Equivir technology.