XML 21 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates by their nature are based on judgments and available information. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant assumptions and estimates involved in preparing the financial statements include those related to useful lives of property and equipment, the useful lives of intangible assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, fair values assigned to intangibles, interest rate swaps, and stock-based awards, and the valuation of goodwill.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition are classified as cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where we become aware of a specific customer's inability to meet our financial obligations, we record a specific reserve to reduce the amounts recorded to what we believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debt based on historical experience of bad debts, adjusted for relative improvements or deteriorations in the agings and changes in current economic conditions if necessary. Expected credit losses are recorded as an allowance for doubtful accounts. Receivables are written off when management believes they are uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is approximately $238 and $175 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We provide for depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives. We do not depreciate land. Estimated useful lives are as follows:
Radio, network and communications equipment
 
3 to 10 years
Office computers, equipment and software
 
3 to 7 years
Leasehold improvements and building
 
Shorter of useful life or lease term and 35 years, respectively

We capitalize external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing and obtaining internal use computer software, and the payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time to, developing the internal use computer software. Our management’s judgment is required in determining the point at which various projects enter the stages at which costs may be capitalized, in assessing the ongoing value of the capitalized costs, and in determining the estimated useful lives over which the costs are amortized. We expect to continue to invest in internally-developed software.

The cost and accumulated depreciation applicable to assets retired or sold are removed from the respective accounts, and gains or losses thereon are included in the consolidated statements of operations. Repairs and maintenance costs that do not extend the useful lives of the assets are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

We operate as one reporting unit. Goodwill represents the excess portion of the purchase price that could not be attributed to specific tangible or identified intangible assets recorded in connection with purchase accounting. Acquired intangibles are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill is not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or when changes in circumstances indicate an impairment event may have occurred. Impairment is determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. Our business is largely homogeneous and, as a result, all of the goodwill is associated with one reporting unit. We perform our annual impairment testing in our fiscal fourth quarter. Based on the results of our reviews, no goodwill impairment loss is recognized in the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Subsequent to this review, there have been no events or circumstances that indicate any potential impairment of our goodwill balance.

Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of advertiser and producer relationships, affiliate service agreements, trade names, customer relationships, technology, beneficial lease interest, non-compete agreements acquired, and insertion orders. The intangible asset values assigned are determined based upon the expected discounted aggregate cash flows to be derived over the life of the assets.

We amortize the value assigned to intangibles as follows:
Advertiser and producer relationships
 
15 years
Affiliate service agreements
 
10 years
Trade names
 
4 to 5 years
Customer relationships
 
4 years
Technology
 
8 years
Beneficial lease interest
 
7 years
Non-compete agreements
 
4 years
Insertion orders
 
1 year

Intangible assets that have definite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indicators are present, we would test for recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the asset. If those net undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying amount (i.e., the asset is not recoverable), we would perform the next step, which is to determine the fair value of the asset, and record an impairment, if any. We re-evaluate the useful life determinations for these intangible assets each year to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision in their remaining useful lives. We have determined that there were no indicators of impairment of definite-lived intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Restricted Investment

Our sole restricted investment consists of a certificate of deposit that is collateral for a lease deposit in connection with a New York office lease and is reported in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. This investment is categorized as a held-to-maturity security (see Note 10 — Fair Value Measurements). As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the balance in this restricted investment was $538. The certificate of deposit matures in May 2012.

Investments

Investments in which we have significant influence, but less than a controlling voting interest, are accounted for using the equity method. Significant influence is generally presumed to exist when we own an interest of approximately 20% to 50%, and exercise significant influence. Under the equity method of accounting, we include our investment in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The consolidated statements of operations include our share of the investee's earnings (losses), and the consolidated statements of cash flows include all cash received from or paid to the investee. Investments in which we have no significant influence (generally less than a 20% ownership interest), or do not exert significant influence, are designated as available-for-sale investments if readily determinable market values are available. If an investment’s fair value is not readily determinable, we account for our investment at cost.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are amortized under the interest method over the term of the debt. Amortization expense was $3,171 and $1,427 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included in interest expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2011, deferred financing costs of $1,759 were expensed in the fourth quarter related to Verge's early repayment of its long-term debt at the Merger Date. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, deferred financing costs were $11,557 and $2,683, respectively, and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

Deferred Rent

We recognize rent expense on leases containing scheduled rent increases by amortizing the aggregate minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are primarily comprised of network radio advertising. Radio advertising revenues are recognized, net of agency fees and producer fees, when the advertising has aired. Revenue generated from charging fees to radio stations and networks for music libraries, audio production elements, and jingle production services are recognized upon delivery, or on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract, depending on the terms of the respective contracts.

In those instances where we function as the principal in the transaction, the revenue and associated operating costs are presented on a gross basis. In those instances where we function as an agent or sales representative, our effective commission is presented within revenue.

Stock-Based Compensation

Under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting periods. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires significant judgment, including estimating the expected term over which the stock awards will be outstanding before they are exercised, the expected volatility of our stock and the number of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. In order to determine the estimated period of time that we expect employees to hold their share-based options, we have used data on the historical exercise pattern of employees. We use the historical volatility of our common stock in order to estimate future share price trends. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. The risk free interest rate that we use in the option valuation model is based on U.S. treasury zero-coupon bonds with a remaining term similar to the expected term of the options. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. If the actual forfeiture rate differs significantly from our estimates, our stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of accounts receivable.

Our revenues are generated primarily from companies located in the United States. We perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and, in certain instances, require payment in advance. Accounts receivable are due principally from large U.S. companies under stated contract terms. We provide for estimated credit losses, as required.

For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, one customer accounted for approximately 19% of gross revenues. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately 9% and 28%, respectively, of accounts receivable is due from this customer.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs totaled $425 and $303 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized for the temporary differences between our financial statement and our tax basis of the assets and liabilities. We calculate the deferred income taxes using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to the taxable income for each year in which the deferred tax liability or asset is expected to be settled or realized. In 2011, we recognized a non-cash benefit of approximately $2,600 related to a reduction of our deferred tax valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2011.

We adopted the applicable sections of FASB ASC Topic 740-10 that were included in the pre-Codification FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty of Income Taxes. This authoritative guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with this interpretation is a two-step process. The first step is recognition, in which the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The second step is measurement. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of the liability to recognize in the financial statements.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

From time to time we enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage the risks associated with our variable rate debt. These interest rate swaps are not designated as hedges. Accordingly, interest rate swap agreements are recorded at fair value, and included in assets or liabilities, as appropriate. Changes in fair value at each balance sheet date, and upon maturity, are included in interest expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations. We were not a party to any interest rate swap agreements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. All of our prior swaps expired during 2010. There was $1,100 interest expense related to the interest rate swaps on the 2010 consolidated statement of operations. In January 2012, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage the risks associated with our variable rate debt as required by our New Credit Agreements. These swaps fix the interest rate at 3.0% on a notional amount of $122,500 of the outstanding debt, are not designated as hedges and expire on March 31, 2015.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The three-tier hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, which prioritizes the inputs used in the methodologies of measuring fair value for assets and liabilities, is as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
Level 3 — No observable pricing inputs in the market

Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurements requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the assets and liabilities being measured, and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, when measuring fair value.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share excludes the effect of common stock equivalents and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Shares issued during the period and shares re-acquired during the period are weighted for the portion of the period that they are outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could result if securities or other contracts to issue common stock are exercised or converted into common stock. Common stock equivalents are excluded in periods in which they are anti-dilutive and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the effect of common stock equivalents of 67,824 and 0 were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the effect was anti-dilutive. Basic and dilutive shares outstanding include the Class A common stock and Class B common stock combined after the adjustment for the conversion of the Class B common stock in connection with the Merger

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in previously issued financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income. Due to the impact of the Merger, we reconsidered the classification of the following items:

reclassification in the consolidated balance sheets of capitalized software of $942 from other assets to property and equipment, net;
reclassification in the consolidated statements of operations of $3,072 from other operating costs to compensation costs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The adoption of the following accounting standards and updates during 2011 did not result in a significant impact to the consolidated financial statements:

Effective January 1, 2011, we adopted new guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements and certain arrangements that include software elements. The new guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements requires entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement within the scope of the guidance using estimated selling prices based on a selling price hierarchy. It also eliminates the residual method of revenue allocation and requires revenue to be allocated using the relative selling price method. Application of the new guidance did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance to clarify and revise the requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. We will adopt this guidance prospectively beginning in fiscal 2012. We do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance which improves the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increases the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income ("OCI") by eliminating the option to present components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The amendments in this standard require that all non-owner changes in stockholders equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Subsequently in December 2011, the FASB issued additional guidance which indefinitely defers the requirement to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from OCI to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of OCI are presented. The amendments in these standards do not change the items that must be reported in OCI, when an item of OCI must be reclassified to net income, or change the option for an entity to present components of OCI gross or net of the effect of income taxes. All amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment.  This update simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment.  It provides an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Given this option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The updates are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of 2011.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities ("ASU 2011-11"). The ASU 2011-11 amendments require companies to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. ASU 2011-11 is required to be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented and is effective for annual periods for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual fiscal years. We do not expect adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.