0000897101-15-000737.txt : 20150529 0000897101-15-000737.hdr.sgml : 20150529 20150529065906 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000897101-15-000737 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: SD PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 13p-1 1.01 20141231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20150529 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20150529 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CYBEROPTICS CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000768411 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS & LENSES [3827] IRS NUMBER: 411472057 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MN FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SD SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-16577 FILM NUMBER: 15897136 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5900 GOLDEN HILLS DR CITY: GOLDEN VALLEY STATE: MN ZIP: 55416 BUSINESS PHONE: 763-542-5000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5900 GOLDEN HILLS DR CITY: GOLDEN VALLEY STATE: MN ZIP: 55416 SD 1 cyber151935_sd.htm FORM SD

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM SD

Specialized Disclosure Report

 

 

CyberOptics Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Minnesota
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)
0-16577
(Commission File Number)
41-1472057
(IRS Employer Identification No.)

 

5900 Golden Hill Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota
(Address of principal executive offices)
55416
(Zip Code)

 

 

Jeffrey Bertelsen (763) 542-5000

(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the
person to contact in connection with this report.)

  

 

 

Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:

  

 

Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2014.

 

 

 

 
 

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT

 

Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure

 

Items 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report

 

Conflict Minerals Disclosure

 

This Form SD of CyberOptics Corporation (the “Company”) is filed pursuant to Rule 13p-1 (the “Rule”) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the reporting period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.

 

A copy of the Company’s Conflict Minerals Report is provided as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD, and is publicly available at www.cyberoptics.com

 

Item 1.02 Exhibit

 

As specified in Item 1.01 of this Form SD, the Company is hereby filing its Conflict Minerals Report as Exhibit 1.01 to this report.

 

Section 2 — Exhibits

 

Item 2.01 Exhibits

 

The following exhibit is filed as part of this report.

 

Exhibit No. Description
   
1.01 Conflict Minerals Report of CyberOptics Corporation

 

 

 

 
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.

 

 

CyberOptics Corporation

 

/s/ Jeffrey Bertelsen   May 29, 2015
By Jeffrey Bertelsen, Chief Financial Officer   (Date)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EX-1.01 2 cyber151935_ex1-01.htm CONFLICT MINERALS REPORT

Exhibit 1.01

 

CyberOptics Corporation

 

Conflict Minerals Report

 

For the reporting period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

 

This Conflict Minerals Report (the “Report”) of CyberOptics Corporation (the “Company”) has been prepared pursuant to Rule 13p-1 and Form SD (the “Rule”) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the reporting period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.

 

The rule requires disclosure of certain information when a company manufactures or contracts to manufacture products and the minerals specified in the Rule are necessary to the functionality or production of those products. The specified minerals, which we collectively refer to in this Report as the “Conflict Minerals,” are gold, columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite and wolframite, including their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin and tungsten. The “Covered Countries” for purposes of the Rule and this Report are the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, Zambia and Angola. As described in this Report, certain of the Company’s operations manufacture, or contract to manufacture, products, and the Conflict Minerals are necessary to the functionality of those products.

 

If a registrant can establish that the Conflict Minerals originated from sources other than the Covered Countries, or from recycled and scrap sources, or if it has no reason to believe that its Conflict Minerals may have originated in the Covered Countries, or if based on its reasonable country of origin inquiry the registrant reasonably believes that its Conflict Minerals did come from recycled or scrap sources, they must submit a Form SD which describes the Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry completed. However, if a registrant has reason to believe that any of the Conflict Minerals in their supply chain may have originated in the Covered Countries, or if they are unable to determine the country of origin of those Conflict Minerals, then the issuer must exercise due diligence on the Conflict Minerals source and chain of custody. The registrant must annually submit a report, Conflict Minerals Report (CMR), to the SEC that includes a description of those due diligence measures.

 

Pursuant to SEC guidance, this Report is not audited and is not required to be audited as none of the Company’s products have been found to be “DRC conflict free”.

 

Description of The Company’s Products Covered by this Report

 

We develop, manufacture and sell intelligent, non-contact sensors and systems for process control and inspection. Our products are used primarily in the Surface Mount Technology (SMT) electronic circuit board assembly and semiconductor fabrication industries and enable manufacturers to increase operating efficiencies, product yields and quality. In addition to proprietary hardware designs that combine precision optics, various light sources and multiple detectors, our products incorporate software that controls the hardware and filters and converts raw data into application specific information. Our product offerings are sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and end-user customers who use our SMT sensors, inspection systems and WaferSense® products for process and quality control in the circuit board manufacturing and semiconductor fabrication processes.

 

Three main types of products are covered by this Report.

 

a)Surface Mount Technology (SMT) Electronic Assembly Alignment Sensors

 

These are a family of alignment sensors that are customized and incorporated into the equipment manufactured by our customers for use in SMT circuit board assembly.

 

b)Surface Mount Technology (SMT) Inspection Systems

 

 
 

These are solder paste inspection (SPI) and automated optical inspection (AOI) inspection system products used in the SMT electronic assembly industry for process control and inspection. These systems are sold directly to end-user manufacturing customers that use them in a production line or along-side a production line to maintain process and quality control.

 

c)Semiconductor Products

 

Our principal semiconductor products include the WaferSense® family of products, which are a series of wireless sensors that provide measurements of critical factors in the semiconductor fabrication process. Other semiconductor products include sensors that inspect the presence and orientation of semiconductor wafers in cassettes and Front Opening Unified Pods (FOUPS) during the fabrication process, and frame grabber and machine vision subsystems.

 

Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry

 

The Company has conducted a good faith reasonable country of origin inquiry regarding the Conflict Minerals. This was done using a survey of our suppliers. This good faith inquiry was designed to determine, to the extent reasonably possible, whether any Conflict Minerals in our products originated in the Covered Countries and whether any of the Conflict Minerals may be from recycled or scrap sources.

 

Due Diligence

 

1.1Due Diligence Design

 

We exercised due diligence on the source and chain of custody of Conflict Minerals in our products. Our due diligence measures have been designed to conform, in all material respects, with the framework in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition and the related Supplements for gold and for tin, tantalum and tungsten.

 

1.2Supply Chain

 

We do not purchase Conflict Minerals directly from mines, smelters or refiners and do not have any direct relationship with them. Our supply chain with respect to our products is complex and there are many parties in the supply chain between the manufacture of our products and the original source of Conflict Minerals.

 

1.3Controls Systems

 

We have established a Conflict Minerals Steering Committee, which consists of the Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer, the Vice President of Worldwide Operations, and the Corporate Counsel. The team is responsible for implementing our Conflict Minerals compliance strategy. Senior management is briefed about the results of our due diligence efforts on a regular basis.

 

Other controls include, but are not limited to, our Conflict Minerals Policy which is available at: http://www.cyberoptics.com/pdf/Support/QF74_013.pdf. The Conflict Minerals Policy is part of our supplier terms in our standard terms and conditions of purchase.

 

1.4Supplier Information

 

We have identified 35 top tier suppliers of products that likely contain Conflict Minerals.

 

Supplier Survey

 

We conducted a survey of those suppliers described above using a questionnaire designed to determine the presence of Conflict Minerals in the products supplied to us as well as information regarding the source of the Conflict Minerals, if known. It includes questions regarding a supplier’s conflict-free policy and its engagement with its direct suppliers.

 

 
 

Survey Responses

 

We received responses from all suppliers surveyed. We reviewed the responses against criteria developed to determine which required further engagement with our suppliers. These criteria included untimely or incomplete responses as well as inconsistencies within the data reported in the template.

 

Two suppliers were able to specify all the smelters or refiners used in components or products supplied to their customers. For Tin, we know the identified smelter or refiner listed below from one of these suppliers must have been used in the components or products supplied to us. For Gold, they were not able to specify which of these smelters or refiners were specifically used in the components or products supplied us. As such, we know that one or more of the following Gold smelters or refiners were used in some or all of the components or products supplied to us by these suppliers. We checked each of these smelters against the Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI) list and all of them have been certified as conflict free.

 

Mineral Smelter Name Location of Smelter
Gold Western Australian Mint trading as The Perth Mint Australia
Gold Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co. Ltd China
Gold Zijin Mining Group Co. Ltd China
Gold Heraeus Ltd. Hong Kong Hong Kong
Gold Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation China
Tin Yunnan Tin Company Limited China

 

Some suppliers were able to specify some, but not all of the smelters or refiners that are used in their components and products. However, these suppliers were not able to determine if such smelters or refiners were used in the components and products supplied to us. The majority our suppliers were not able to specify the smelters or refiners used for components or products supplied to us.

 

We are therefore able to determine or to identify some of the smelters or refiners in our supply chain, but not all.

 

1.5 Risk Mitigation & Future Due Diligence Measures

 

In response to this risk assessment, we have approved a risk management plan, through which the Conflict Minerals program is implemented, managed and monitored. Updates to this risk assessment are provided regularly to senior management.

 

We intend to take the following steps to improve the due diligence conducted to further mitigate any risk that the necessary Conflict Minerals in our products could benefit armed groups in the DRC or adjoining countries:

 

Engage with suppliers and direct them to training resources to attempt to increase the response rate and improve the content of the supplier survey responses.

 

Engage any of our suppliers whom we have reason to believe are supplying us with Conflict Minerals from sources that may support conflict in the DRC or any adjoining country to establish an alternative source of Conflict Minerals that does not support such conflict, as provided in the OECD guidance.

 

Continue to check smelters against known lists for conflict free smelters.

 

Begin using the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) reporting template as the basis of surveying our suppliers as this template has become the standard in industry and will assist our suppliers in providing their information to us.

 

 
 

Conclusion

 

After exercising the due diligence described above, the Company was unable to determine whether or not its products contain conflict minerals: (1) from recycled or scrap sources as defined in the Conflict Minerals Rule, (2) that did not originate in the Covered Countries, or (3) that did not directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups, as defined in the Conflict Minerals Rule, in the Covered Countries.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Conflict Minerals Report contains forward-looking statements, which are based on our current expectations and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that may cause these forward-looking statements to be inaccurate. These statements include statements regarding our goals for future improvements to our due diligence process and to mitigate the risk about the sourcing of our conflict minerals. All forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty. Risks that may cause these forward-looking statements to be inaccurate include: failure to carry out these plans in a timely manner or at all; lack of cooperation or progress by our suppliers, their respective suppliers and smelters; or lack of progress by smelter or refiner validation programs for conflict minerals (including the possibility of inaccurate information, fraud and other irregularities).  In addition, you should also consider the important factors described in reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC, including the factors described under the sections titled “Risk Factors” in our most recently submitted Annual and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, respectively. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to update information contained in these forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.