XML 129 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Income Taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Income Taxes [Abstract]  
Income Taxes

13.  INCOME TAXES:

We recorded income tax expense of $74,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2013, reflecting an effective tax rate of a negative 2%, compared to an income tax benefit of $86,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012, reflecting an effective tax rate of a negative 58%.  In the fourth quarter of 2012, we recorded a valuation allowance against substantially all of our United States and Singapore based deferred tax assets.  Our income tax expense and effective tax rate in the six months ended June 30, 2013, reflects minimal state income tax expense and foreign income tax expense associated with our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and China.

We currently have significant deferred tax assets as a result of temporary differences between taxable income on our tax returns and U.S. GAAP income, research and development tax credit carry forwards and federal, state and foreign net operating loss carry forwards.  A deferred tax asset generally represents future tax benefits to be received when temporary differences previously reported in our financial statements become deductible for income tax purposes, when net operating loss carry forwards are applied against future taxable income, or when tax credit carry forwards are utilized on our tax returns. We assess the realizability of our deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance based on the guidance provided in current financial accounting standards.

 

Significant judgment is required in determining the realizability of our deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether valuation allowances are required considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of any current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry forward periods, our experience with loss carry forwards not expiring unused and tax planning alternatives.

At December 31, 2012, we concluded that a valuation allowance was needed for substantially all of our United States and Singapore based deferred tax assets due to the decline in our level of profitability and near term financial outlook.  In analyzing the need for a valuation allowance, we first considered our history of operating results for income tax purposes over the past three years in each of the tax jurisdictions where we operate, our financial performance in recent quarters, statutory carry forward periods and tax planning alternatives.  Finally, we considered both our near and long-term financial outlook and timing regarding when we might return to profitability.  After considering all available evidence, both positive and negative, we concluded that a valuation allowance with respect to substantially all of our U.S. and Singapore based deferred tax assets, was required at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Deferred tax assets at June 30, 2013 include net operating loss carry forwards incurred in the UK by CyberOptics Ltd., which was acquired in 1999. The utilization of these net operating loss carry forwards is dependent on CyberOptics Ltd.’s ability to generate sufficient UK taxable income during the carry forward period.