XML 55 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Regulatory Rate Filings
 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Regulated Operations [Abstract]  
Regulatory Rate Filings
Regulatory Rate Filings
California Regulatory Affairs
On June 19, 2019, the CPUC issued its final decision resolving the remaining issues in San Jose Water Company’s General Rate Case Application No. 18-01-004 (“GRC”). Decision 19-06-010 denied the establishment of a Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism and Sales reconciliation Mechanism and authorized the recovery of the Hydro Generation Research, Development and Demonstration Memorandum Account balance of $1,243. San Jose Water Company filed Advice Letter No. 534 on August 1, 2019, to recover this amount via a surcharge over a three-year period. The CPUC rejected the advice letter on October 10, 2019, citing an error and recommended a correction and a new filing for recovery. San Jose Water Company anticipates correcting the record and filing a new advice letter for recovery in the fourth quarter of 2019.
On July 20, 2018, the CPUC issued an Order Instituting Investigation (“OII”) No. 18-07-007 concerning SJW Group’s merger with CTWS. A Scoping Memorandum was issued on September 7, 2018, which identified the issues to be considered in the proceeding as to whether the proposed merger is subject to CPUC approval and to evaluate the merger’s likely impacts within California. On September 14, 2018, SJW Group and San Jose Water Company submitted joint comments in response to the issues identified in accordance with the Scoping Memorandum’s adopted schedule, and reply comments were submitted on October 19, 2018. A Public Participation Hearing was held on January 31, 2019. On March 4, 2019, the CPUC suspended this proceeding due to SJW Group’s announcement of its intention to file a new merger approval application with the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (“PURA”). On April 3, 2019, SJW Group and CTWS jointly filed a new merger application with PURA. After securing the required approvals from both PURA and Maine Public Utilities Commission, SJW Group announced the close of the merger on October 9, 2019, and notified the CPUC accordingly.
In January 2017, a San Jose Water Company customer inquired about the company’s billing practice as it related to the proration of service charges in billing cycles where a rate change occurred. On June 22, 2017, San Jose Water Company was served with Complaint 17-06-009 regarding its billing practice for service charge rate changes. The billing issue was made a part of San Jose Water Company’s GRC proceeding and a settlement agreement was reached with the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (now the Public Advocates Office) on May 23, 2018, limiting the duration from which to calculate customer refunds from June 1, 2011, through December 31, 2016. Accordingly, San Jose Water Company provided an additional reserve to cover the remaining period covered by the settlement. In accordance with Decision 18-11-025 for the GRC, San Jose Water Company filed Advice Letter No. 530 proposing total refunds of $2,020 for the period from June 1, 2011 through December 31, 2016. This advice letter became effective February 8, 2019, and refunds were completed by mid-May 2019. On April 22, 2019, the CPUC dismissed Complaint 17-07-009 citing the relief provided in Advice Letter No. 530 and the current OII on this matter (see below for further discussion). The Complainant filed an appeal with the CPUC to dispute the dismissal. This appeal was rejected and the Complaint was dismissed via CPUC Decision No. 19-09-040 on September 24, 2019.
On September 14, 2018, the CPUC issued OII No. 18-09-003 to which San Jose Water Company was named as Respondent. The OII will determine whether the company unlawfully overcharged customers over a 30-year period by failing to pro-rate service charges when increases occurred during a billing period, and whether the company double-billed service charges during one billing period when allegedly switching from billing such charges in advance to billing in arrears.  The OII resulted from a report by the CPUC’s Consumer Protection and Enforcement Division (“CPED”), dated August 16, 2018, recommending an investigation into San Jose Water Company’s billing practice.  CPED calculated a refund obligation of approximately $2,061 for the years 2014 to 2016 that had been the subject of San Jose Water Company’s Advice Letter No. 510.  CPED calculated a further refund obligation of approximately $1,990 for the years 1987 to 2013.  CPED also asserted that the company double-billed its customers during a billing period when it allegedly converted from billing in advance to billing in arrears, assumed that such double-billing occurred in January 2011, and calculated a refund obligation of approximately $4,935.  The OII notes these estimates and identifies the proper refund amount as an issue in the proceeding.  The OII also identifies the CPUC’s authority to consider imposing penalties on San Jose Water Company in amounts ranging from five hundred dollars to fifty thousand dollars per offense, per day. On July 24, 2019, San Jose Water Company and CPED jointly filed a motion for CPUC approval of a Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) over San Jose Water Company’s past customer billing practices. The
Agreement requires the company to pay approximately $2,100 in customer credits, consisting of $1,757 for refunds during the period from 1987 to 2011 and an additional $350 in customer credits to low income water customers, and invest $5,000 in utility plant that is not allowed an investment return or rate recovery. San Jose Water Company has recorded the $2,100 customer credit expense as an offset to revenues in the accompanying June 30, 2019, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The $5,000 commitment to invest in utility plant will be recognized as plant in service on the company’s financial statements once invested. The Agreement is subject to final approval by the CPUC which is expected in the fourth quarter of 2019.
On March 29, 2019, San Jose Water Company filed Advice Letter No. 532 with the CPUC requesting authorization to recover the $9,020 balance in its WCMA for the period of January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. This advice letter is pending before the CPUC.
On August 30, 2019, San Jose Water Company filed Advice Letter No. 535 with the CPUC requesting authorization to increase the total 2019 authorized revenue requirements by $655 or 0.17% for plant additions related to the Montevina Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Project in 2018. This advice letter became effective September 29, 2019.
San Jose Water Company filed Advice Letter No. 537 with the CPUC requesting authorization to refund the balance in its 2018 Tax Accounting Memorandum Account as required by the GRC decision on October 18, 2019.  For a typical residential customer with a 3/4-inch meter, the refund will be $1.74 per month for 12 months or until the balance is amortized.  This advice letter is pending before the CPUC and is expected to have an effective date of January 1, 2020.
Texas Regulatory Affairs
The Public Utilities Commission of Texas (“PUCT”) directed CLWSC (as well as other Class A water utilities in Texas) to quantify all of the impacts of the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) (“Tax Act”) on December 22, 2017 and make rate adjustments reflecting such impacts on a prospective basis. PUCT Order 47945-36 as amended by Order 47945-41 requires the water utilities to record a regulatory liability that reflects (1) the difference between the revenues collected under existing rates and the revenues that would have been collected had the existing rates been set using the recently approved federal income tax rates; and (2) the balance of excess accumulated deferred federal income taxes that now exists because of the decrease in the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%. A rate proposal reflecting these tax changes was submitted for PUCT’s review on April 19, 2018.