XML 35 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.4
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Aircraft commitments
 
Alaska and Hawaiian have contractual commitments for aircraft with Boeing. Horizon has contractual commitments for aircraft with Embraer. The amounts disclosed below reflect commitments for firm aircraft orders. Option deliveries are excluded until exercise.

In 2025, Alaska executed an amendment to its purchase agreement with Boeing to purchase 53 incremental B737-10 aircraft scheduled for delivery between 2032 and 2035, and exercised 52 B737-10 option aircraft scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2032. Alaska also added 35 incremental B737-10 option aircraft to its purchase agreement. Additionally, Alaska entered into a supplemental agreement with Boeing to exercise five (5) B787 option aircraft scheduled for delivery between 2031 and 2032.

Boeing has communicated that certain B737 and B787 aircraft are expected to be delivered later than the contracted delivery timing. This includes certain B737-8 aircraft contracted for delivery in 2025 and 2026 that have moved into 2026 and 2027, and certain B787 aircraft contracted for delivery in 2025 that have moved into 2026. B737-10 aircraft contracted for delivery between 2027 and 2035 may be delayed pending certification of the aircraft type. Management expects that other Boeing aircraft deliveries could be delayed beyond the contractual delivery. The table below reflects Boeing's communications.
Details for contractual aircraft delivery commitments:
Firm OrdersOptions and Other Rights
Aircraft Type2026-20352028-2035
B73717471
B78712
E1753
   Total18971

Capacity purchase agreement commitments

Alaska has obligations associated with its CPA with SkyWest. The amounts disclosed below consider certain assumptions regarding the level of flying performed by the carrier on behalf of Alaska and exclude lease costs associated with the CPA.

A summary of aircraft and capacity purchase agreement commitments:
(in millions)
Aircraft
Capacity Purchase Agreements
2026$890 $207 
20271,570 213 
20281,687 219 
20291,179 224 
20301,043 150 
Thereafter4,253 133 
Total$10,622 $1,146 

Contingencies
 
The Company is a party to routine litigation matters incidental to its business and with respect to which no material liability is expected. Liabilities for litigation related contingencies are recorded when a loss is determined to be probable and estimable.

As part of the 2016 acquisition of Virgin America, Alaska assumed responsibility for the Virgin trademark license agreement with the Virgin Group. In 2019, pursuant to that agreement's venue provision, the Virgin Group sued Alaska in England, alleging that the agreement requires Alaska to pay $8 million per year as a minimum annual royalty through 2039, adjusted annually for inflation and irrespective of Alaska's actual use (or non-use) of the mark. Alaska stopped making royalty payments in 2019 after ending all use of the Virgin brand. On February 16, 2023, the commercial court issued a ruling adopting Virgin Group’s interpretation of the license agreement. The Company appealed the decision. On June 11, 2024, the appellate court issued a final decision affirming the lower court ruling in favor of the Virgin Group. Alaska also commenced a separate claim for breach of the agreement against the Virgin Group that may affect the Company’s total liability in the matter. In 2025, Alaska was ordered to pay Virgin Group $32 million, representing past due royalties through September 2022, when Alaska commenced its separate claim against Virgin Group. Alaska holds an accrual for $36 million in Other accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, representing the expenses associated with the trademark license agreement incurred through December 31, 2025, and management's current estimate of the amount due to the Virgin Group.

Credit card agreements
 
Alaska and Hawaiian have agreements with a number of credit card companies to process the sale of tickets and other services. Under these agreements, there are material adverse change clauses that, if triggered, could result in the credit card companies holding back a reserve of up to 100% of the credit card receivable balance associated with that processor, which would result in a restriction of cash. For example, certain agreements require Alaska to maintain a reserve if Air Group's credit rating is downgraded to or below a rating specified by the agreement or if its cash and marketable securities balance fell below $500 million. The Company is not currently required to maintain any reserve under these agreements. If Air Group were unable to obtain a waiver of, or otherwise mitigate the increase in the restriction of cash, it could have a material impact on the Company's operations, business or financial condition.