Note 8 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Corporation complies with the guidance of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. The Corporation also follows the guidance on matters relating to all financial instruments found in ASC Subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments – Overall.

Fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants as of the measurement date. Fair value is best determined by values quoted through active trading markets. Active trading markets are characterized by numerous transactions of similar financial instruments between willing buyers and willing sellers. Because no active trading market exists for various types of financial instruments, many of the fair values disclosed were derived using present value discounted cash flows or other valuation techniques described below. As a result, the Corporation’s ability to actually realize these derived values cannot be assumed.

The Corporation measures fair values based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Paragraph 820-10-35-37. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value under the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities. This level is the most reliable source of valuation.

Level 2: Quoted prices that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (for example, interest rates and yield curves at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates). It also includes inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs). Several sources are utilized for valuing these assets, including a contracted valuation service, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) evaluations and pricing services, and other valuation matrices.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the valuation assumptions and not readily observable in the market (i.e. supported with little or no market activity). Level 3 instruments are valued based on the best available data, some of which is internally developed, and consider risk premiums that a market participant would require.

The level established within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Corporation believes that its valuation techniques are appropriate and consistent with the techniques used by other market participants. However, the use of different methodologies and assumptions could result in a different estimate of fair values at the reporting date. The valuation techniques used by the Corporation to measure, on a recurring and non-recurring basis, the fair value of assets as of March 31, 2013 are discussed in the paragraphs that follow.

Investments – The investment portfolio is classified and accounted for based on the guidance of ASC Topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities.

The fair value of investments available-for-sale is determined using a market approach. As of March 31, 2013, the U.S. Government agencies, residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, and municipal bonds segments are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. Their fair values were determined based upon market-corroborated inputs and valuation matrices, which were obtained through third party data service providers or securities brokers through which the Corporation has historically transacted both purchases and sales of investment securities.

The CDO segment, which consists of pooled trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts and insurance companies, is classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. At March 31, 2013, the Corporation owned 18 pooled trust preferred securities with an amortized cost of $36.9 million and a fair value of $13.8 million. The market for these securities at March 31, 2013 is not active and markets for similar securities are also not active. The inactivity was evidenced first by a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets in which these securities trade and then by a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels. The new issue market is also inactive, as few CDOs have been issued since 2007. There are currently very few market participants who are willing to effect transactions in these securities. The market values for these securities or any securities other than those issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) are depressed relative to historical levels. Therefore, in the current market, a low market price for a particular bond may only provide evidence of stress in the credit markets in general rather than being an indicator of credit problems with a particular issue. Given the conditions in the current debt markets and the absence of observable transactions in the secondary and new issue markets, management has determined that (a) the few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are not reliable for the purpose of obtaining fair value at March 31, 2013, (b) an income valuation approach technique (i.e. present value) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs will be equally or more representative of fair value than a market approach, and (c) the CDO segment is appropriately classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because management determined that significant adjustments were required to determine fair value at the measurement date.

Management utilizes an independent third party to prepare both the evaluations of other-than-temporary impairment as well as the fair value determinations for its CDO portfolio. Management does not believe that there were any material differences in the impairment evaluations and pricing between March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The approach of the third party to determine fair value involves several steps, including detailed credit and structural evaluation of each piece of collateral in each bond, default, recovery and prepayment/amortization probabilities for each piece of collateral in the bond, and discounted cash flow modeling. The discount rate methodology used by the third party combines a baseline current market yield for comparable corporate and structured credit products with adjustments based on evaluations of the differences found in structure and risks associated with actual and projected credit performance of each CDO being valued. Currently, the only active and liquid trading market that exists is for stand-alone trust preferred securities. Therefore, adjustments to the baseline discount rate are also made to reflect the additional leverage found in structured instruments.

Derivative financial instruments (Cash flow hedge) – The Corporation’s open derivative positions are interest rate swaps that are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. Open derivative positions are valued using externally developed pricing models based on observable market inputs provided by a third party and validated by management. The Corporation has considered counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets.

Impaired loans – Loans included in the table below are those that are considered impaired with a specific allocation or with a partial charge-off, based upon the guidance of the loan impairment subsection of the Receivables Topic, ASC Section 310-10-35, under which the Corporation has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value consists of the loan balance less its valuation allowance and is generally determined based on independent third-party appraisals of the collateral or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

Other real estate owned – Other real estate owned included in the table below are considered impaired with specific write-downs. Fair value of other real estate owned is based on independent third-party appraisals of the properties. These values were determined based on the sales prices of similar properties in the approximate geographic area. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2013, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:



		Fair Value at March 31, 2013	Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Significant Unobservable Input Value
Recurring:

Investment Securities – available for sale	$	13,798	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate	Swap+19%; Range of Libor+ 9% to 20%

Cash Flow Hedge	$	(748)	Discounted Cash Flow	Reuters Third Party Market Quote	99.9% (weighted avg 99.9%)

Non-recurring:

Impaired Loans	$	14,763	Market Comparable Properties	Marketability Discount	10% (1) (weighted avg 10%)

OREO	$	38	Market Comparable Properties	Marketability Discount	10% (1) (weighted avg 10%)

(1)	Range would include discounts taken since appraisal and estimated values

For assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:


			Fair Value Measurements at
			March 31, 2013 Using
			(In Thousands)
		Assets Measured at Fair Value	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
Description		3/31/2013	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Recurring:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	47,228		$	47,228
Residential mortgage-backed agencies	$	81,418		$	81,418
Commercial mortgage-backed agencies	$	15,026		$	15,026
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	23,279		$	23,279
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	58,691		$	58,691
Collateralized debt obligations	$	13,798				$	13,798
Financial Derivative	$	(748)				$	(748)
Non-recurring:
Impaired loans	$	14,763				$	14,763
Other real estate owned	$	38				$	38



			Fair Value Measurements at
			December 31, 2012 Using
			(In Thousands)
		Assets Measured at Fair Value	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
Description		12/31/2012	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Recurring:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	40,320		$	40,320
Residential mortgage-backed agencies	$	44,108		$	44,108
Commercial mortgage-backed agencies	$	37,618		$	37,618
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	31,731		$	31,731
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	58,054		$	58,054
Collateralized debt obligations	$	11,442				$	11,442
Financial Derivative	$	(849)				$	(849)
Non-recurring:
Impaired loans	$	13,560				$	13,560
Other real estate owned	$	3,165				$	3,165

There were no transfers of assets between any of the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended March 31, 2013 or March 31, 2012.

The following tables show a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair valued assets measured on a recurring basis using Level 3 significant unobservable inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:



		Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
		Unobservable Inputs
		(Level 3)
		(In Thousands)


		Investment Securities		Cash Flow
		Available for Sale		Hedge
Beginning balance January 1, 2013	$	11,442	$	(849)
Total gains realized/unrealized:
Included in other comprehensive income		2,356		101
Ending balance March 31, 2013	$	13,798	$	(748)

The amount of total gains or losses for the period
included in earnings attributable to the change in
realized/unrealized gains or losses related to assets
still held at the reporting date	$	0	$	0


		Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
		Unobservable Inputs
		(Level 3)
		(In Thousands)

		Investment Securities		Cash Flow
		Available for Sale		Hedge
Beginning balance January 1, 2012	$	9,447	$	(1,034)
Total gains realized/unrealized:
Included in other comprehensive income		507		46
Ending balance March 31, 2012	$	9,954	$	(988)

The amount of total gains or losses for the period
included in earnings attributable to the change in
realized/unrealized gains or losses related to assets
still held at the reporting date	$	0	$	0

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the periods above are reported in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in Other Operating Income.

The fair values disclosed may vary significantly between institutions based on the estimates and assumptions used in the various valuation methodologies. The derived fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and significant judgment. Therefore, they cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the assumptions could significantly impact the derived estimates of fair value. Disclosure of non-financial assets such as buildings as well as certain financial instruments such as leases is not required. Accordingly, the aggregate fair values presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation to estimate its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Cash and due from banks: The carrying amounts as reported in the statement of financial condition for cash and due from banks approximate their fair values.

Interest bearing deposits in banks: The carrying amount of interest bearing deposits approximates their fair values.

Securities held to maturity: Investments in debt securities classified as held to maturity are measured subsequently at amortized cost in the statement of financial position. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

Restricted Investment in Bank stock: The carrying value of stock issued by the FHLB of Atlanta, ACBB and CBB approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the stock.

Loans (excluding impaired loans with specific loss allowances): For variable-rate loans that re-price frequently or “in one year or less”, and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed-rate loans that do not re-price frequently are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current market interest rates being offered on the various loan products.

Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, savings, and certain types of money market accounts, etc.) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on the various certificates of deposit to the cash flow stream.

Borrowed funds: The fair value of the Bank’s FHLB borrowings and junior subordinated debt is calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, using rates currently existing for borrowings with similar remaining maturities. The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase approximate their fair values.

Accrued Interest: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and payable approximates their fair values.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments: In the normal course of business, the Bank makes commitments to extend credit and issues standby letters of credit. The Bank expects most of these commitments to expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Due to the uncertainty of cash flows and difficulty in the predicting the timing of such cash flows, fair values were not estimated for these instruments.

The following tables present fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The actual carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments that are included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition are as follows:



	March 31, 2013					Fair Value Measurements
	Carrying		Fair		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(in thousands)	Amount		Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	71,592	$	71,592	$	71,592
Interest bearing deposits in banks		13,236		13,236		13,236
Investment securities - AFS		239,440		239,440			$	225,642	$	13,798
Investment securities - HTM		4,040		4,318						4,318
Restricted Bank stock		7,853		7,853				7,853
Loans, net		843,644		849,518						849,518
Accrued interest receivable		4,059		4,059				4,059

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits – non-maturity		611,585		574,093				574,093
Deposits – time deposits		364,215		372,857				372,857
Short-term borrowed funds		38,633		38,633				38,633
Long-term borrowed funds		182,720		190,311				190,311
Accrued interest payable		5,881		5,881				5,881
Financial derivative		748		748						748
Off balance sheet financial instruments		0		0		0



	December 31, 2012					Fair Value Measurements
	Carrying		Fair		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(in thousands)	Amount		Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	71,290	$	71,290	$	71,290
Interest bearing deposits in banks		11,778		11,778		11,778
Investment securities - AFS		223,273		223,273			$	211,831	$	11,442
Investment securities - HTM		4,040		4,347						4,347
Restricted Bank stock		8,349		8,349				8,349
Loans, net		858,782		865,405						865,405
Accrued interest receivable		4,494		4,494				4,494

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits- non-maturity		593,224		593,224				593,224
Deposits- time deposits		383,660		392,155				392,155
Short-term borrowed funds		39,257		39,257				39,257
Long-term borrowed funds		182,735		190,531				190,531
Accrued interest payable		5,415		5,415				5,415
Financial derivative		849		849						849
Off balance sheet financial instruments		0		0		0

Loans are measured using a discounted cash flow method. The significant unobservable inputs used in the Level 3 fair value measurements of the Corporation’s loans included in the tables above are calculated based on the Corporation’s internal new volume rate.