XML 81 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Variable Interest Entities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]  
Variable Interest Entities

1.

Variable Interest Entities

As noted in Note 13, First United Corporation created the Trusts for the purposes of raising regulatory capital through the sale of mandatorily redeemable preferred capital securities to third party investors and common equity interests to First United Corporation.  The Trusts are considered VIEs, but are not consolidated because First United Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of the Trusts.  At December 31, 2012, the Corporation reported all of the $41.7 million of TPS Debentures issued in connection with these offerings as long-term borrowings (along with the $5.0 million of stand-alone junior subordinated debentures), and it reported its $1.3 million equity interest in the Trusts as “Other Assets”. 

 

            In November 2009, the Bank became a 99.99% limited partner in Liberty Mews Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), a Maryland limited partnership formed for the purpose of acquiring, developing and operating low-income housing units in Garrett County, Maryland.  The Partnership was financed with a total of $10.6 million of funding, including a $6.1 million equity contribution from the Bank as the limited partner. The Partnership used the proceeds from these sources to purchase the land and construct a 36-unit low income housing rental complex at a total cost of $10.6 million.  The total assets of the Partnership were  $10.0 million at December 31, 2012 and $10.9 million at December 31, 2011.

 

            Through December 31, 2012, the Bank had made contributions to the Partnership totaling $6.1 million.  The project was completed in June 2011, and the Bank is entitled to $8.4 million in federal investment tax credits over a 10-year period as long as certain qualifying hurdles are maintained.  The Bank will also receive the benefit of tax operating losses from the Partnership to the extent of its capital contribution. The investment in the Partnership assists the Bank in achieving its community reinvestment initiatives.

 

            Because the Partnership is considered to be a VIE, management performed an analysis to determine whether its involvement with the Partnership would lead it to determine that it must consolidate the Partnership.  In performing its analysis, management evaluated the risks creating the variability in the Partnership and identified which activities most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance.  Finally, it examined each of the variable interest holders to determine which, if any, of the holders was the primary beneficiary based on their power to direct the most significant activities and their obligation to absorb potentially significant losses of the Partnership. 

 

            The Bank, as a limited partner, generally has no voting rights. The Bank is not in any way involved in the daily management of the Partnership and has no other rights that provide it with the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Partnership’s economic performance, which are to develop and operate the housing project in such a manner that complies with specific tax credit guidelines.  As a limited partner, there is no recourse to the Bank by the creditors of the Partnership.  The tax credits that result from the Bank’s investment in the Partnership are generally subject to recapture should the partnership fail to comply with the applicable government regulations.  The Bank has not provided any financial or other support to the Partnership beyond its required capital contributions and does not anticipate providing such support in the future. Management currently believes that no material losses are probable as a result of the Bank’s investment in the Partnership.

On the basis of management’s analysis, the general partner is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the Partnership. Because the Bank is not the primary beneficiary, the Partnership has not been included in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

 

At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Corporation included its total investment in the Partnership in “Other Assets” in its Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.  As of December 31, 2012, the Corporation’s commitment in the Partnership is fully funded.  The following table presents details of the Bank’s involvement with the Partnership at the dates indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

(In thousands)

2012

2011

Investment in LIHTC Partnership

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount on Balance Sheet of:

 

 

 

 

  Investment (Other Assets)

$

5,498 

$

5,980 

Maximum exposure to loss

 

5,498 

 

5,980