XML 35 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Recurring

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
December 31:
20182017
(In thousands)TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets
Derivative assets$— $— $— $— $930 $— $930 $— 
Liabilities
Contingent consideration$7,302 $— $— $7,302 $12,545 $— $— $12,545 
Derivative liabilities 1,108 — 1,108 — — — — — 

Derivative Instruments

The Company’s objectives in using commodity derivatives are to add stability to expense and to manage its exposure to certain commodity price movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company uses commodity swaps as part of its commodity risk management strategy. Commodity swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve fixing the price on a fixed volume of a commodity on specified dates. The commodity swaps are typically cash settled for their fair value at or close to their settlement dates.

At December 31, 2018, the Company had five commodity swap derivative instruments for a total of 34.4 million pounds of steel used to hedge its commodity price risk on a portion of the exposure to movements associated with steel costs. These derivatives expire at various dates through February 2020, at an average steel price of $0.39 per pound. These derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges of commodity price risk; therefore, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified in the period during which the hedged transactions affects earnings within the same income statement line item as the earnings effect of the hedged transaction. These derivative instruments were valued at fair value using a market approach based on the quoted market prices of similar instruments at the end of the reporting period. At December 31, 2018, the $1.1 million corresponding liability was recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities ($0.9 million) and other long-term liabilities ($0.2 million) as reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had derivative instruments for 12.0 million pounds of steel in order to manage a portion of the exposure to movements associated with steel costs. These derivative instruments expired in December 2018, at an average steel price of $0.25 per pound. While these derivative instruments were considered to be economic hedges of the underlying movement in the price of steel, they were not designated or accounted for as a hedge. These derivative instruments were valued at fair value using a market approach based on the quoted market prices of similar instruments at the end of each reporting period, and the resulting net gain or loss was recorded in cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Income. At December 31, 2017, the $0.9 million corresponding asset was recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets as reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contingent Consideration Related to Acquisitions

Liabilities for contingent consideration related to acquisitions were estimated at fair value using management’s projections for long-term sales forecasts, including assumptions regarding market share gains and future industry-specific economic and market conditions, and a market participant’s weighted average cost of capital. Over the next six years, the Company’s long-term sales growth forecasts for products subject to contingent consideration arrangements average approximately 13 percent per year. For further information on the inputs used in determining the fair value, and a roll-forward of the contingent consideration liability, see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Changes in either of the inputs in isolation would result in a change in the fair value measurement. A change in the assumptions used for sales forecasts would result in a directionally similar change in the fair value liability, while a change in the weighted average cost of capital would result in a directionally opposite change in the fair value liability. If there is an increase in the fair value liability, the Company would record a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses, and if
there is a decrease in the fair value liability, the Company would record a benefit in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Non-recurring

The following table presents the carrying value at December 31 of any assets and liabilities which were measured at fair value and recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, on a non-recurring basis, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), and the corresponding non-recurring losses or gains recognized during the years ended December 31:
201820172016
(In thousands)Carrying
Value
Non-Recurring
Losses/(Gains)
Carrying
Value
Non-Recurring
Losses/(Gains)
Carrying
Value
Non-Recurring
Losses/(Gains)
Assets
Net assets of acquired businesses$128,725 $— $35,224 $— $41,808 $— 

Net Assets of Acquired Businesses

The Company valued the assets and liabilities associated with the acquisitions of businesses on the respective acquisition dates. Depending upon the type of asset or liability acquired, the Company used different valuation techniques in determining the fair value. Those techniques included comparable market prices, long-term sales, profitability and cash flow forecasts, assumptions regarding future industry-specific economic and market conditions, a market participant’s weighted average cost of capital, as well as other techniques as circumstances required. For further information on acquired assets and liabilities, see Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.