0000076321-19-000051.txt : 20190529 0000076321-19-000051.hdr.sgml : 20190529 20190529170945 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000076321-19-000051 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: SD PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 13p-1 1.01 20181231 1.02 20181231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20190529 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20190529 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PARKER DRILLING CO /DE/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000076321 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: DRILLING OIL & GAS WELLS [1381] IRS NUMBER: 730618660 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SD SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-07573 FILM NUMBER: 19863037 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5 GREENWAY PLAZA STREET 2: SUITE 100 CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77046 BUSINESS PHONE: 281-406-2000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5 GREENWAY PLAZA STREET 2: SUITE 100 CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77046 SD 1 pkd2019formsd.htm SD Document



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
________________________


FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report


PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

________________________

Delaware
1-7573
73-0618660
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(Commission File Number)
I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)


5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77046
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)


Jennifer Simons (281) 406-2000
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person
to contact in connection with this report)



Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:

[X]
Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2018.




Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure

Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report

Disclosure Requirement

This Disclosure for the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”)”is presented to comply with Rule 13p-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Rule”). The Rule was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to “Conflict Minerals” as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ( “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Rule imposes certain reporting obligations on SEC registrants whose manufactured products contain Conflict Minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of their products. Conflict Minerals are defined therein as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, wolframite, and their derivatives, which are limited to tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold.
 
In 2018, Parker Drilling Company (“Company”), to a limited extent, manufactured products for which Conflict Minerals are necessary to the functionality or production (collectively, the “Products”). As required by Form SD, the Company has conducted, in good faith, a reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) regarding the Conflict Minerals included in the Products during the Reporting Period, to determine whether any such Conflict Minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (together, the “Covered Countries”), and whether any of the Conflict Minerals were from recycled or scrap sources. Where applicable, the Company has conducted additional due diligence regarding the sources of the Conflict Minerals. The results of the Company’s RCOI regarding such Conflict Minerals, as well as its additional due diligence regarding the sources of the Conflict Minerals, are contained in the Company’s Conflict Minerals Report, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD, and is publicly available on our website, www.parkerdrilling.com.

Item 1.02 Exhibit

As an Exhibit to this Form SD, we provide the Conflict Minerals Report as required by Item 1.01.

Section 2 – Exhibits

Item 2.01 Exhibits

Exhibit 1.01 – Conflict Minerals Report, for the reporting period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form.





SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date:     May 29, 2019    PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
By:
/s/ Jennifer F. Simons    
Jennifer F. Simons
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary




EX-1.01 2 sdexhibit101.htm EXHIBIT 1.01 Exhibit

Exhibit 1.01

Conflict Minerals Report

This Conflict Minerals Report of Parker Drilling Company for the calendar year of 2018 was prepared in accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This Conflict Minerals Report contains one or more forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws.  These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors including, among other things, our customers’ requirements to use certain suppliers, our suppliers’ responsiveness and cooperation with our due diligence efforts, our ability to implement improvements in our conflict minerals program, changes to the sourcing status of smelters and refiners in our supply chain, and our ability to identify and mitigate related risks in our supply chain.  We undertake no obligation to review or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after filing this Conflict Minerals Report with the SEC, except as required by law.

Business Overview

The Company is an international provider of contract drilling and drilling-related services and rental tools and services. We report our Rental Tools Services as one reportable segment (“Rental Tools”) and report our Drilling Services as two reportable segments: (1) United States (“U.S.”) (Lower 48) Drilling and (2) International & Alaska Drilling.

In our Drilling Services business, we drill oil, natural gas and geothermal wells for customers in both the U.S. and international markets. We provide this service with both Company-owned rigs and customer-owned rigs. We refer to the provision of drilling services with customer-owned rigs as our operations and management (“O&M”) service in which operators own their own drilling rigs but choose Parker Drilling to operate and manage the rigs for them. The nature and scope of activities involved in drilling an oil and natural gas well are similar whether the well is drilled with a Company-owned rig (as part of a traditional drilling contract) or a customer-owned rig (as part of an O&M contract). In addition, we provide project-related services, such as engineering, procurement, project management and commissioning of customer-owned drilling facility projects. We have extensive experience and expertise in drilling geologically difficult wells and in managing the logistical and technological challenges of operating in remote, harsh and ecologically sensitive areas.

In our Rental Tools business, we provide premium rental equipment and services to exploration and production (“E&P”) companies, drilling contractors and service companies on land and offshore in the U.S. and international markets. Tools we provide include standard and heavy-weight drill pipes, all of which are available with standard or high-torque connections, tubing, drill collars, pressure control equipment, including blow-out preventers (“BOPs”), and more. We also provide well construction services, which include tubular running services and downhole tool rentals, and well intervention services, which include whipstocks, fishing and related services, as well as inspection and machine shop support. Rental tools are used during drilling and/or workover programs and are requested by the customer when they are needed, which requires us to keep a broad inventory of rental tools in stock. Rental tools are usually rented on a daily or monthly basis.





Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry

We conducted an analysis of our business and determined that even though we do not operate a specific manufacturing segment, we do, on occasion and as part of the services offered to our customers, manufacture products for sale and for use by our customers. As part of our analysis, all manufactured products were assessed in order to identify Conflict Minerals scope and risk. Our analysis did not identify any Conflict Mineral or Conflict Mineral derivative other than tungsten that is contained as a necessary element to the functionality or production of any product manufactured for sale by the Company.

Based on this, the Company identified products for which tungsten was used as a necessary element to their functionality or production. Identified products containing tungsten as a necessary element to their functionality or production are:

Whipstocks;
Mills;
Watermelon Mills;
Top-Tek Casing Running Tools (“CRT”).

After performing this analysis, we conducted a reasonable country of origin inquiry to determine whether any of the tungsten used in our Products originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country, or whether such tungsten came from recycled or scrap sources. Based on the limited scope of the Company’s product manufacturing, we contacted each of our tungsten suppliers. We received responses from all tungsten suppliers.

For the Company’s suppliers, all provided their Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”). Based on the responses to our RCOI, we know or have reason to believe that a small portion of the Conflict Minerals in our Products from one supplier may have originated from the Covered Countries and may not be solely from recycled or scrap sources. 

Due Diligence

We undertook due diligence on the sources of the Conflict Minerals we use. Our due diligence measures are designed to conform with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. We conducted our due diligence using tools and relying on information provided by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (“RMI”) (formerly Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (“CFSI”)).  In addition to reviewing the CMRT, which facilitates the collection of information on the source of Conflict Minerals, we also relied on information from the Responsible Mineral Assurance Process (“RMAP”), a voluntary initiative managed by the RMI in which an independent third party audits the procurement activities of a smelter or refiner to determine, with reasonable confidence, that the minerals it processes originated from conflict-free sources. Upon completion of a successful audit, the smelter or refiner is designated by the RMI as “Conformant.”





Results of Due Diligence

For the calendar year of 2018, the Company determined that a single supplier stated that one of its suppliers identified smelters sourcing from a Covered Country (smelters listed by this supplier included below in Table 1). These suppliers and others of our suppliers may not have received accurate and complete information from their respective suppliers. In summary, we were not able to establish chain of custody or determine whether any of the Conflict Minerals used in our Products originated from Covered Countries. We were also unable to determine the facilities used to process Conflict Minerals necessary to the functionality or production of our Products or the countries of origin of those Conflict Minerals. Accordingly, we were unable to undertake any efforts beyond the RCOI and the due diligence described above to determine the mine or location of origin of Conflict Minerals used in our Products.

Please note, we do not have access to audit reports or detailed findings of third-party audits conducted as part of the RMAP or any equivalent audit programs accepted by the RMI. Audits conducted as part of the RMAP or any other equivalent programs and the information received from respondents may yield inaccurate or incomplete conclusions.

Table 1: Smelter/Refiner List
Smelter/Refiner Name
RMAP Status
Sourced from Covered Country?
A.L.M.T. TUNGSTEN Corp.
Conformant
No
Asia Tungsten Products Vietnam Ltd.
Conformant
Yes
Chenzhou Diamond Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Fujian Jinxin Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Ganzhou Haichuang Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Ganzhou Jiangwu Ferrotungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Global Tungsten & Powders Corp.
Conformant
No
Guangdong Xianglu Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co. KG
Conformant
No
H.C. Starck Tungsten GmbH
Conformant
No
Hunan Chenzhou Mining Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Hunan Chuangda Vanadium Tungsten Co., Ltd. Wuji
Conformant
No
Hunan Chunchang Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Hydrometallurg, JSC
Conformant
No
Jiangwu H.C. Starck Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Jiangxi Gan Bei Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Jiangxi Tonggu Non-ferrous Metallurgical & Chemical Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Jiangxi Tungsten Co Ltd
Not Enrolled
No
Jiangxi Xinsheng Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Jiangxi Xiushui Xianggan Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
Not Enrolled
No
Jiangxi Yaosheng Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Kennametal Fallon
Conformant
No
Kennametal Huntsville
Conformant
No



Smelter/Refiner Name
RMAP Status
Sourced from Covered Country?
Malipo Haiyu Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Nui Phao H.C. Starck Tungsten Chemicals Manufacturing LLC
Not Enrolled
No
Tejing (Vietnam) Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
No
Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG
Conformant
No
Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd.
Conformant
Yes
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
Yes
Xinhai Rendan Shaoguan Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Conformant
Yes

Countries of Origin

The countries of origin for the smelters and refiners in Table 1 are believed to be those listed below. The list is based on publicly available information, our RCOI, and due diligence. However, for the reasons described herein, these possible countries of origin cannot necessarily be linked to materials used in our Products.
Austria
China
Germany
Japan
Russian Federation
Vietnam
United States

Plans to review and determine if additional due diligence efforts are warranted.

The Company plans to continue to review its supply chain, continue dialogue with suppliers, and determine additional steps that may be appropriate to continue conforming our due diligence and supply chain to an internationally recognized due diligence framework. The Company is committed to ensuring that the Company’s suppliers comply with its expectations with regard to responsible supply chain management of minerals.