XML 36 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
Following the sale of Oakland Commons, including the related ground lease thereon, the Company is a lessee under one ground lease agreement at December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, the Company's remaining lease term is approximately 46.4 years, and the discount rate used to calculate the Company's lease liability is approximately 8.6%. Rent expense under the Company's ground lease and executive office lease agreements was approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million for 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The following table represents a reconciliation of the Company's undiscounted future minimum lease payments for its ground lease agreement applicable to lease liabilities as of December 31, 2024:
2025$177,000 
2026177,000 
2027177,000 
2028177,000 
2029177,000 
Thereafter7,314,000 
Total undiscounted future minimum lease payments8,199,000 
Future minimum lease payments, discount(6,175,000)
Lease liabilities$2,024,000 
Insurance
The Company carries comprehensive liability, property, fire, flood, wind, extended coverage, business interruption and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in its portfolio under an insurance policy, in addition to other coverages, such as trademark and pollution coverage that may be appropriate for certain of its properties. Additionally, the Company carries a directors', officers', entity and employment practices liability insurance policy that covers such claims made against the Company and its directors and officers. The Company believes the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate for its properties and the other covered items given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage, requirements from any and all lenders and general industry practice; however, its insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover losses.
Regulatory and Environmental
As the owner of the buildings on our properties, the Company could face liability for the presence of hazardous materials (e.g., asbestos or lead) or other adverse conditions (e.g., poor indoor air quality) in its buildings. Environmental laws govern the presence, maintenance, and removal of hazardous materials in buildings, and if the Company does not comply with such laws, it could face fines for such noncompliance. Also, the Company could be liable to third parties (e.g., occupants of the buildings) for damages related to exposure to hazardous materials or adverse conditions in its buildings, and the Company could incur material expenses with respect to abatement or remediation of hazardous materials or other adverse conditions in its buildings. In addition, some of the Company's tenants routinely handle and use hazardous or regulated substances and wastes as part of their operations at our properties, which are subject to regulation. Such environmental and health and safety laws and regulations could subject the Company or its tenants to liability resulting from these activities. Environmental liabilities could affect a tenant's ability to make rental payments to the Company, and changes in laws could increase the potential liability for noncompliance. This may result in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise materially and adversely affect the Company's operations. The Company is not aware of any material contingent liabilities, regulatory matters or environmental matters that may exist.
Litigation
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its business, including, but not limited to commercial disputes. The Company believes that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on its financial position or its results of operations. The Company records a liability when it considers the loss probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
On September 4, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the District of Maryland's order dismissing the consolidated complaints in the Sydney, et al. v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., et al., (Case No. C-15-CV-22-001527) and Kim v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 22-cv-01103 lawsuits, and the matters are now concluded.