SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There were no material changes to the summary of significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Fair Value Measurements — The Company considers warrants that are not indexed to the Company’s own stock to be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not grant any warrants not indexed to the Company’s own stock.

The following table presents the change in Level 3 liabilities at:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,717		$	61,808
Fair value adjustment		(477	)		(24,006	)
Balance at end of period	$	1,240		$	37,802

The fair value of these warrants was derived using the Black-Scholes pricing model.  The most significant input to the model is the Company’s stock price, which was $0.60 and $1.25 at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt. The Company classifies its outstanding debt as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and estimated that its carrying value approximated fair value as of March 31, 2014. This estimate is based on acceptable valuation methodologies which use market data of similarly sized and situated debt issuers.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards—In the normal course of business, the Company evaluates all new accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, Securities and Exchange Commission, Emerging Issues Task Force, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and other authoritative accounting bodies to determine the potential impact they may have on the Company’s financial statements. Based upon this review, management does not expect any of the recently issued accounting standards to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements — The Company considers warrants that are not indexed to the Company’s own stock to be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not grant any warrants not indexed to the Company’s own stock.

The following table presents the change in Level 3 liabilities at:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,717		$	61,808
Fair value adjustment		(477	)		(24,006	)
Balance at end of period	$	1,240		$	37,802

The fair value of these warrants was derived using the Black-Scholes pricing model.  The most significant input to the model is the Company’s stock price, which was $0.60 and $1.25 at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt. The Company classifies its outstanding debt as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and estimated that its carrying value approximated fair value as of March 31, 2014. This estimate is based on acceptable valuation methodologies which use market data of similarly sized and situated debt issuers.