Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of the Business

As of December 31, 2016, the Company owns and operates 101 manufactured home communities containing approximately 18,000 developed sites. These communities are located in New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Indiana and Michigan.

These manufactured home communities are listed by trade names as follows:

MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY	LOCATION
Allentown	Memphis, Tennessee
Arbor Estates	Doylestown, Pennsylvania
Auburn Estates	Orrville, Ohio
Birchwood Farms	Birch Run, Michigan
Broadmore Estates	Goshen, Indiana
Brookside Village	Berwick, Pennsylvania
Brookview Village	Greenfield Center, New York
Candlewick Court	Owosso, Michigan
Carsons	Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
Catalina	Middletown, Ohio
Cedarcrest	Vineland, New Jersey
Chambersburg I & II	Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
Chelsea	Sayre, Pennsylvania
City View	Lewistown, Pennsylvania
Clinton Mobile Home Resort	Tiffin, Ohio
Collingwood	Horseheads, New York
Colonial Heights	Wintersville, Ohio
Countryside Estates	Muncie, Indiana
Countryside Estates	Ravenna, Ohio
Countryside Village	Columbia, Tennessee
Cranberry Village	Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
Crestview	Sayre, Pennsylvania
Cross Keys Village	Duncansville, Pennsylvania
Dallas Mobile Home Community	Toronto, Ohio
Deer Meadows	New Springfield, Ohio
D & R Village	Clifton Park, New York
Evergreen Estates	Lodi, Ohio
Evergreen Manor	Bedford, Ohio
Evergreen Village	Mantua, Ohio

MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY	LOCATION
Fairview Manor	Millville, New Jersey
Forest Creek	Elkhart, Indiana
Forest Park Village	Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
Frieden Manor	Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania
Green Acres	Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
Gregory Courts	Honey Brook, Pennsylvania
Hayden Heights	Dublin, Ohio
Heather Highlands	Inkerman, Pennsylvania
Highland	Elkhart, Indiana
Highland Estates	Kutztown, Pennsylvania
Hillside Estates	Greensburg, Pennsylvania
Holiday Village	Nashville, Tennessee
Holiday Village	Elkhart, Indiana
Holly Acres Estates	Erie, Pennsylvania
Hudson Estates	Peninsula, Ohio
Huntingdon Pointe	Tarrs, Pennsylvania
Independence Park	Clinton, Pennsylvania
Kinnebrook	Monticello, New York
Lake Sherman Village	Navarre, Ohio
Lakeview Meadows	Lakeview, Ohio
Laurel Woods	Cresson, Pennsylvania
Little Chippewa	Orrville, Ohio
Maple Manor	Taylor, Pennsylvania
Meadowood	New Middletown, Ohio
Meadows	Nappanee, Indiana
Melrose Village	Wooster, Ohio
Melrose West	Wooster, Ohio
Memphis Blues	Memphis, Tennessee
Monroe Valley	Ephrata, Pennsylvania
Moosic Heights	Avoca, Pennsylvania
Mountaintop	Ephrata, Pennsylvania
Oak Ridge Estates	Elkhart, Indiana
Oakwood Lake Village	Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania
Olmsted Falls	Olmsted Falls, Ohio
Oxford Village	West Grove, Pennsylvania
Pine Ridge Village/Pine Manor	Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Pine Valley Estates	Apollo, Pennsylvania
Pleasant View Estates	Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania
Port Royal Village	Belle Vernon, Pennsylvania
River Valley Estates	Marion, Ohio
Rolling Hills Estates	Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Rostraver Estates	Belle Vernon, Pennsylvania
Sandy Valley Estates	Magnolia, Ohio
Shady Hills	Nashville, Tennessee
Somerset Estates/Whispering Pines	Somerset, Pennsylvania
Southern Terrace	Columbiana, Ohio
Southwind Village	Jackson, New Jersey
Spreading Oaks Village	Athens, Ohio
Springfield Meadows	Springfield, Ohio
Suburban Estates	Greensburg, Pennsylvania
Summit Estates	Ravenna, Ohio
Sunny Acres	Somerset, Pennsylvania
Sunnyside	Eagleville, Pennsylvania
Trailmont	Goodlettsville, Tennessee
Twin Oaks I & II	Olmsted Falls, Ohio

MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY	LOCATION
Twin Pines	Goshen, Indiana
Valley High	Ruffs Dale, Pennsylvania
Valley Hills	Ravenna, Ohio
Valley Stream	Mountaintop, Pennsylvania
Valley View I	Ephrata, Pennsylvania
Valley View II	Ephrata, Pennsylvania
Valley View Honeybrook	Honey Brook, Pennsylvania
Voyager Estates	West Newton, Pennsylvania
Waterfalls Village	Hamburg, New York
Wayside	Lakeview, Ohio
Weatherly Estates	Lebanon, Tennessee
Woodland Manor	West Monroe, New York
Woodlawn Village	Eatontown, New Jersey
Woods Edge	West Lafayette, Indiana
Wood Valley	Caledonia, Ohio
Worthington Arms	Lewis Center, Ohio
Youngstown Estates	Youngstown, New York

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The Company prepares its financial statements under the accrual basis of accounting, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company’s subsidiaries are all 100% wholly-owned. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include all of these subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company does not have a majority or minority interest in any other company, either consolidated or unconsolidated.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated balance sheets and revenue and expenses for the years then ended. These estimates and assumptions include the allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory, depreciation, valuation of securities, reserves and accruals, and stock compensation expense. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Investment Property and Equipment and Depreciation

Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation for Sites and Buildings is computed principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (ranging from 15 to 27.5 years). Depreciation of Improvements to Sites and Buildings, Rental Homes and Equipment and Vehicles is computed principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (ranging from 3 to 27.5 years). Land Development Costs are not depreciated until they are put in use, at which time they are capitalized as Site and Land Improvements. Interest Expense pertaining to Land Development Costs are capitalized. Maintenance and Repairs are charged to expense as incurred and improvements are capitalized. The costs and related accumulated depreciation of property sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the financial statements and any gain or loss is reflected in the current year’s results of operations.

The Company applies Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360-10, Property, Plant& Equipment (“ASC 360-10”) to measure impairment in real estate investments. Rental properties are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected future cash flows (on an undiscounted basis without interest) from a rental property is less than the carrying value under its historical net cost basis. These expected future cash flows consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Upon determination that a permanent impairment has occurred, rental properties are reduced to their fair value. For properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of the property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the property measured at the time there is a commitment to sell the property and/or it is actively being marketed for sale. A property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Subsequent to the date that a property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded.

The Company conducted a comprehensive review of all real estate asset classes in accordance with ASC 360-10-35-21. The process entailed the analysis of property for instances where the net book value exceeded the estimated fair value. The Company utilizes the experience and knowledge of its internal valuation team to derive certain assumptions used to determine an operating property’s cash flow. Such assumptions include lease-up rates, rental rates, rental growth rates, and capital expenditures. The Company reviewed its operating properties in light of the requirements of ASC 360-10 and determined that, as of December 31, 2016, the undiscounted cash flows over the expected holding period for these properties were in excess of their carrying values and, therefore, no impairment charges were required.

Acquisitions

The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). ASC 805 requires that transaction costs, such as broker fees, transfer taxes, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional and consulting fees, related to acquisitions be expensed as incurred.

Upon acquisition of a property, the Company allocates the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of land, site and land improvements, buildings and improvements and rental homes. The Company generally allocates the purchase price of an acquired property determined by internal evaluation as well as a third-party appraisal of the property obtained in conjunction with the purchase.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company maintains its cash in bank accounts in amounts that may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in these accounts in the past. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their current carrying amounts since all such items are short-term in nature.

Securities Available for Sale

Investments in securities available for sale primarily consist of marketable common and preferred stock securities of other REITs, which the Company generally limits to no more than approximately 20% of its undepreciated assets. These marketable securities are all publicly-traded and purchased on the open market, through private transactions or through dividend reinvestment plans. These securities may be classified among three categories: held-to-maturity, trading, and available-for-sale. The Company normally holds REIT securities on a long term basis and has the ability and intent to hold securities to recovery, therefore as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s securities are all classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value based upon quoted market prices in active markets. Gains or losses on the sale of securities are based on average cost and are accounted for on a trade date basis. Unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized. The change in the unrealized net holding gains (losses) is reflected in the Company’s Comprehensive Income (loss).

The Company individually reviews and evaluates our marketable securities for impairment on a quarterly basis or when events or circumstances occur. The Company considers, among other things, credit aspects of the issuer, amount of decline in fair value over cost and length of time in a continuous loss position. The Company has developed a general policy of evaluating whether an unrealized loss is other than temporary. On a quarterly basis, the Company makes an initial review of every individual security in its portfolio. If the security is impaired, the Company first determines our intent and ability to hold this investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Next, the Company determines the length of time and the extent of the impairment. Barring other factors, including the downgrading of the security or the cessation of dividends, if the fair value of the security is below cost by less than 20% for less than 6 months and the Company has the intent and ability to hold the security, the security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. Otherwise, the Company reviews additional information to determine whether the impairment is other than temporary. The Company discusses and analyzes any relevant information known about the security, such as:

a.	Whether the decline is attributable to adverse conditions related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or in a geographic area.
b.	Any downgrading of the security by a rating agency.
c.	Whether the financial condition of the issuer has deteriorated.
d.	Status of dividends – Whether dividends have been reduced or eliminated, or scheduled interest payments have not been made.
e.	Analysis of the underlying assets (including NAV analysis) using independent analysis or recent transactions.

The Company normally holds REIT securities long term and has the ability and intent to hold securities to recovery. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized in earnings and the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as the new cost basis.

Inventory of Manufactured Homes

Inventory of manufactured homes is valued at the lower of cost or market value and is determined by the specific identification method. All inventory is considered finished goods.

Accounts and Notes Receivables

The Company’s accounts, notes and other receivables are stated at their outstanding balance reduced by an allowance for uncollectible accounts. The Company evaluates the recoverability of its receivables whenever events occur or there are changes in circumstances such that management believes it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the notes receivable or lease agreements. The collectability of notes receivable is measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flow discounted at the notes receivable effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the notes receivable is collateral dependent. Total notes receivables at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $18,361,298 and $18,281,392, respectively. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the reserves for uncollectible accounts, notes and other receivables were $1,138,282 and $1,040,415, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the provisions for uncollectible notes and other receivables were $909,397, $1,123,926 and $1,020,655, respectively. Charge-offs and other adjustments related to repossessed homes for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $811,530, $1,151,976 and $1,049,577, respectively.

The Company’s notes receivable primarily consists of installment loans collateralized by manufactured homes with principal and interest payable monthly. The average interest rate on these loans is approximately 9.4% and the average maturity is approximately 10 years.

Unamortized Financing Costs

Costs incurred in connection with obtaining mortgages and other financings and refinancings are deferred and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related obligations, which is not materially different than the effective interest method. Unamortized costs are charged to expense upon prepayment of the obligation. Upon amendment of the line of credit or refinancing of mortgage debt, unamortized deferred financing fees are accounted for in accordance with ASC 470-50-40, Modifications and Extinguishments. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, accumulated amortization amounted to $3,085,952 and $2,455,392, respectively. The Company estimates that aggregate amortization expense will be approximately $588,000 for 2017, $482,000 for 2018, $475,000 for 2019, $439,000 for 2020 and $439,000 for 2021.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to financial market risks, including interest rate risk on our variable rate debt. We attempt to limit these risks by following established risk management policies, procedures and strategies, including the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company’s primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts is to minimize the variability that changes in interest rates could have on its future cash flows. The Company generally employs derivative instruments that effectively convert a portion of its variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company does enter into various interest rate swap agreements that have the effect of fixing interest rates relative to specific mortgage loans.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company has an interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of fixing interest rates relative to a specific mortgage loan as follows:

Mortgage	Due Date	Mortgage Interest Rate	Effective Fixed Rate			Balance 12/31/16
Various – 11 properties	8/1/2017	LIBOR + 3.00%		3.89	%	$	10,625,352

The Company’s interest rate swap agreement is based upon 30-day LIBOR. The re-pricing and scheduled maturity dates, payment dates, index and the notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreement coincides with those of the underlying mortgage. The interest rate swap agreement is net settled monthly. The Company has designated this derivative as a cash flow hedge and has recorded the fair value on the balance sheet in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (See Note 13 for information on the determination of fair value). The effective portion of the gain or loss on this hedge will be reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent that the hedging relationship is not effective or does not qualify as a cash flow hedge, the ineffective portion is recorded in interest expense. Hedges that received designated hedge accounting treatment are evaluated for effectiveness at the time that they are designated as well as through the hedging period. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has determined that this interest rate swap agreement is highly effective as a cash flow hedge. As a result, the fair value of this derivative of $(3,983) and $(1,700) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, was recorded as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), with the corresponding liability included in Accrued Liabilities and Deposits.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives its income primarily from the rental of manufactured home sites. The Company also owns approximately 4,700 rental units which are rented to residents. Rental and related income is recognized on the accrual basis over the term of the lease, which is typically one year or less.

Sale of manufactured homes is recognized on the full accrual basis when certain criteria are met. These criteria include the following: (a) initial and continuing payment by the buyer must be adequate: (b) the receivable, if any, is not subject to future subordination; (c) the benefits and risks of ownership are substantially transferred to the buyer; and (d) the Company does not have a substantial continued involvement with the home after the sale. Alternatively, when the foregoing criteria are not met, the Company recognizes gains by the installment method. Interest income on loans receivable is not accrued when, in the opinion of management, the collection of such interest appears doubtful.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period (27,808,895, 25,932,626 and 22,496,103 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively). Diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the weighted average number of net shares that would be issued upon exercise of stock options pursuant to the treasury stock method. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, employee stock options to purchase 1,760,000, 1,560,500 and 1,301,000, respectively, shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Stock Compensation Plan

The Company accounts for awards of stock options and restricted stock in accordance with ASC 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ASC 718-10 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and amortized over the service period (generally equal to the vesting period). The compensation cost for stock option grants is determined using option pricing models, intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date less estimated forfeitures. The compensation expense for restricted stock is recognized based on the fair value of the restricted stock awards less estimated forfeitures. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the grant date. Compensation costs, which is included in General and Administrative Expenses, of $1,064,678, $855,768 and $922,944 have been recognized in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, compensation costs included a one-time charge of $312,400, $102,000, and $98,000, respectively, for restricted stock and stock option grants awarded to one participant who is of retirement age and therefore the entire amount of measured compensation cost has been recognized at grant date. Included in Note 6 to these consolidated financial statements are the assumptions and methodology used to calculate the fair value of stock options and restricted stock awards.

Income Tax

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under such provisions, the Company will not be taxed on that portion of its income which is distributed to shareholders, provided it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income, has at least 75% of its assets in real estate investments and meets certain other requirements for qualification as a REIT. The Company has and intends to continue to distribute all of its income currently, and therefore no provision has been made for income or excise taxes. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. The Company is also subject to certain state and local income, excise or franchise taxes. In addition, the Company has a taxable REIT Subsidiaries (“TRS”) which is subject to federal and state income taxes at regular corporate tax rates (See Note 11).

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, that, among other things, defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Based on its evaluation, the Company determined that it has no uncertain tax positions and no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016. The Company records interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as interest expense. As of December 31, 2016, the tax years 2013 through and including 2016 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. There are currently no federal tax examinations in progress.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the change in unrealized gains or losses on securities available for sale and the change in the fair value of derivatives.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation for the current year.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments. The new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. In addition, separate presentation on the face of the income statement or disclosure in the notes is required regarding the portion of the adjustment recorded in the current period earnings, by line item, that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is to be applied prospectively for measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2016, and it did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements.” ASU 2015-15 expands guidance provided in ASU 2015-03 and states that presentation of costs associated with securing a revolving line of credit as an asset is permitted, regardless of whether a balance is outstanding. The Company adopted these standards effective January 1, 2016. This adoption resulted in the reclassification of deferred debt issuance costs of $3,711,591 from other assets ($3,587,294 to mortgages payable and $124,297 to loans payable) in our December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet and reclassification of amortization of financing costs of $829,017 and $522,250 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, to interest expense in our Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss).

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” ASU 2015-02 focuses to minimize situations under previously existing guidance in which a reporting entity was required to consolidate another legal entity in which that reporting entity did not have: (1) the ability through contractual rights to act primarily on its own behalf; (2) ownership of the majority of the legal entity’s voting rights; or (3) the exposure to a majority of the legal entity’s economic benefits. ASU 2015-02 affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2016, and it did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 seeks to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, intangible assets and consolidation. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The amendments should be applied prospectively on or after the effective dates. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-13 requires that entities use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation.” ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.”  ASU 2015-11 applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost. An entity should measure inventory within the scope of ASU 2015-11 at the lower of cost and net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonable predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation.  The amendments in ASU 2015-11 more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  ASU 2015-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". The objective of this amendment is to establish a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying this amendment, companies will perform a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. This amendment applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB ASC. An entity should apply the amendments using either the full retrospective approach or retrospectively with a cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized at the date of initial application. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.