XML 23 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
4.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company accounts for certain financial assets at fair value, defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-level hierarchy is used to show the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair value measurements.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis included the following as of June 30, 2020 (in thousands):
 
 
  
Using
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices
 
 
Other
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
in Active
 
 
Observable
 
 
Unobservable
 
 
Total Fair
 
 
 
Markets
 
 
Inputs
 
 
Inputs
 
 
Value as of
 
 
  
(Level 1)
 
 
(Level 2)
 
 
(Level 3)
 
 
June 30, 2020
 
Cash equivalents:
           
Money market funds
   $ 9,674    $ —        $ —        $ 9,674
Long-term investments:
           
Failed Auction Security
     —          —          2,555      2,555
Liabilities:
           
Contingent consideration obligations
     —          —          (307      (307
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis included the following as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
 
 
  
Using
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices
 
 
Other
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
in Active
 
 
Observable
 
 
Unobservable
 
 
Total Fair
 
 
 
Markets
 
 
Inputs
 
 
Inputs
 
 
Value as of
 
 
 
(Level 1)
 
 
(Level 2)
 
 
(Level 3)
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
Cash equivalents:
           
Money market funds
   $ 9,630    $ —        $ —        $ 9,630
Long-term investments:
           
Failed Auction Security
     —          —          2,510      2,510
Liabilities:
           
Contingent consideration obligations
     —          —          (451      (451
As of June 30, 2020, there was insufficient observable auction rate security market information available to determine the fair value of the Failed Auction Security using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs. As such, the Company’s investment in the Failed Auction Security was deemed to require valuation using Level 3 inputs. Management, after consulting with advisors, valued the Failed Auction Security using analyses and pricing models similar to those used by market participants (i.e., buyers, sellers, and the broker-dealers responsible for execution of the Dutch auction pricing mechanism by which each issue’s interest rate was set). Management utilized a probability weighted discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model to determine the estimated fair value of this security as of June 30, 2020. The major assumptions used in preparing the DCF model were similar to those described in Note 5
Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s 2019 Form
10-K.
Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2020 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
Fai
r

Value
 
 
Valuation

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Technique
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unobservable

Input
 
Weighted

Average
 
Failed Auction Security
  
$
 
2,555
  
 
Discounted cash flow
  
Cumulative probability of earning the maximum rate until maturity
  
 
0.11
  
  
 
  
Cumulative probability of principal return prior to maturity
  
 
94.31
  
  
 
  
Cumulative probability of default
  
 
5.58
  
  
 
  
Liquidity risk premium
  
 
5.00
  
  
 
  
Recovery rate in default
  
 
40.00
The change in the estimated fair value calculated for the investment valued on a recurring basis utilizing Level 3 inputs (i.e., the Failed Auction Security) for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was as follows (in thousands):
 
Balance at the beginning of the period
   $ 2,510
Credit gain on
available-for-sale
security included in Other income (expense), net
     2
Gain included in Other comprehensive income
     43
  
 
 
 
Balance at the end of the period
   $ 2,555
  
 
 
 
The Company has classified its contingent consideration obligations as Level 3 because the fair value for these liabilities was determined using unobservable inputs. The liabilities were based on estimated sales of legacy products over the period of royalty payments at the royalty rate, discounted using the Company’s estimated cost of capital.
The change in the estimated fair value calculated for the liabilities valued on a recurring basis utilizing Level 3 inputs (i.e., the Contingent consideration obligations) for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was as follows (in thousands):
 
Balance at the beginning of the period
  
$
451
Payments
     (144
  
 
 
 
Balance at the end of the period
  
$
307
  
 
 
 
There were no
 t
ransfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2020.