XML 66 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Authoritative guidance on fair value measurements provides a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value, giving the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs).
The Company uses valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. In measuring the fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, market data or assumptions are used that the Company believes market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk when appropriate. The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant  Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
At December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
61,272

 
$
61,272

 
$

 
$

At December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
74,421

 
$
74,421

 
$

 
$

Investment in stock options related to equity securities
262

 

 
262

 


The Company had no transfers of assets between any of the above levels during the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.
Cash equivalents include treasury bills and money market funds that invest in United States government obligations and a Canadian dollar investment account, all with original maturities of three months or less. The original costs of these assets approximate fair value due to their short-term maturity.
Investment in stock options related to equity securities are measured at fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on observable market inputs such as stock prices, interest rates and expected volatility assumptions. Based on these inputs, these assets are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company sold a portion of its investment in stock options for proceeds totaling $0.2 million. The remaining stock options expired unexercised in May 2012.
Other Financial Instruments:
Based upon the rates available to the Company, the fair value of the 9.75% Senior Notes and the note payable to a former executive approximated $274.6 million as of December 31, 2012, compared to the book value of $275.0 million. The quoted market price of the 9.75% Senior Notes was $274.6 million at December 31, 2012. The fair value of the 9.75% Senior Notes and the note payable to a former executive approximated $273.0 million as of December 31, 2011, compared to the book value of $275.1 million. The quoted market price of the 9.75% Senior Notes was $272.9 million at December 31, 2011. The fair value for the Company's most significant debt balance, the 9.75% Senior Notes, was estimated using Level 1 inputs whereas the estimate of fair value for the note payable to a former executive was calculated using Level 2 inputs.