New Accounting Pronouncements	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Accounting Changes And Error Corrections [Abstract]
New Accounting Pronouncements	13. New Accounting Pronouncements In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that applies to companies that have unrecognized tax benefits when net operating loss (NOL) or similar tax loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards exist at the reporting date. Under the updated guidance, an entity should present its unrecognized tax benefits net against the deferred tax assets for all same jurisdiction NOL or similar tax loss carryforwards, or tax credit carryforwards that are available to and would be used by the entity to settle additional income taxes resulting from disallowance of the uncertain tax position. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In July 2013, the FASB issued an ASU to allow entities to use the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. Previously, only the interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the United States and the London Interbank Offered Rate swap rate were considered benchmark rates. The amendment also removed the restriction requiring entities to use the same benchmark rate for similar hedges. This ASU is effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In February 2013, the FASB issued an ASU to improve the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The updated guidance requires an entity to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity must cross-reference to other required disclosures that provide additional details about those amounts. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Because this updated guidance impacts only disclosures in financial statements and does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements, its implementation did not impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In October 2012, the FASB issued an ASU for entities that recognize an indemnification asset as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. When there is a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnification asset as a result of a change in cash flows expected to be collected on the assets subject to indemnification, the reporting entity should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (that is, the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement and the remaining life of the indemnified assets). The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The updated guidance is applied prospectively to any new indemnification assets acquired after the date of adoption and to indemnification assets existing as of the date of adoption arising from a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. The Company’s current accounting policy complies with the guidance in this update. In July 2012, FASB issued an ASU that specifies that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount. Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The guidance in this ASU was effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In December 2011, the FASB issued an ASU to address the differences between international financial reporting standards (IFRS) and U.S. GAAP regarding the offsetting of assets and liabilities. Instead of proposing new criteria for netting assets and liabilities the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) jointly issued common disclosure requirements related to offsetting arrangements that call for the disclosure of both net and gross information for these assets and liabilities, irrespective of whether they are offset on the statement of financial position. In January 2013, the FASB clarified that these disclosure requirements apply only to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with existing accounting guidance or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. An entity is required to provide the new disclosures for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This guidance impacts only the disclosures in financial statements and did not impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

13. New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that applies to companies that have unrecognized tax benefits when net operating loss (NOL) or similar tax loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards exist at the reporting date. Under the updated guidance, an entity should present its unrecognized tax benefits net against the deferred tax assets for all same jurisdiction NOL or similar tax loss carryforwards, or tax credit carryforwards that are available to and would be used by the entity to settle additional income taxes resulting from disallowance of the uncertain tax position. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In July 2013, the FASB issued an ASU to allow entities to use the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. Previously, only the interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the United States and the London Interbank Offered Rate swap rate were considered benchmark rates. The amendment also removed the restriction requiring entities to use the same benchmark rate for similar hedges. This ASU is effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In February 2013, the FASB issued an ASU to improve the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The updated guidance requires an entity to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity must cross-reference to other required disclosures that provide additional details about those amounts. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Because this updated guidance impacts only disclosures in financial statements and does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements, its implementation did not impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In October 2012, the FASB issued an ASU for entities that recognize an indemnification asset as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. When there is a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnification asset as a result of a change in cash flows expected to be collected on the assets subject to indemnification, the reporting entity should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (that is, the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement and the remaining life of the indemnified assets). The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The updated guidance is applied prospectively to any new indemnification assets acquired after the date of adoption and to indemnification assets existing as of the date of adoption arising from a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. The Company’s current accounting policy complies with the guidance in this update.

In July 2012, FASB issued an ASU that specifies that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount. Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The guidance in this ASU was effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued an ASU to address the differences between international financial reporting standards (IFRS) and U.S. GAAP regarding the offsetting of assets and liabilities. Instead of proposing new criteria for netting assets and liabilities the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) jointly issued common disclosure requirements related to offsetting arrangements that call for the disclosure of both net and gross information for these assets and liabilities, irrespective of whether they are offset on the statement of financial position. In January 2013, the FASB clarified that these disclosure requirements apply only to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with existing accounting guidance or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. An entity is required to provide the new disclosures for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This guidance impacts only the disclosures in financial statements and did not impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.