35
The allocation of the
allowance
for loan losses begins with
a process of estimating the
probable
losses inherent for these
types of loans.
The estimates for these loans
are established
by
category and based
on the Company’s
internal system of
credit risk ratings
and historical loss data.
The estimated loan
loss allocation rate for the Company’s
internal system of
credit risk grades
is based on
its experience with
similarly graded
loans. For loan
segments where
the Company
believes it
does not have
sufficient historical loss data,
the Company may
make adjustments based,
in part, on loss rates of peer
bank
groups. At September
30, 2022 and
December 31, 2021, and
for the periods then
ended, the Company
adjusted its historical
loss rates for the commercial
real estate portfolio
segment based,
in part, on
loss rates of peer bank
groups.
The estimated loan
loss allocation for all
five
loan portfolio segments is then
adjusted
for management’s estimate of
probable
losses for several “qualitative
and environmental”
factors.
The
allocation for qualitative
and environmental
factors is particularly
subjective and
does not lend
itself to exact mathematical
calculation.
This amount
represents
estimated probable
inherent credit losses
which
exist, but have
not yet been identified, as
of the balance
sheet date, and
are
based upon quarterly
trend assessments in
delinquent
and nonaccrual
loans, credit concentration
changes,
prevailing
economic conditions, changes
in lending
personnel experience, changes
in lending
policies or procedures and
other
influencing
factors.
These
qualitative
and environmental
factors are considered for each
of the five
loan segments and
the
allowance allocation,
as determined
by the
processes noted above,
is increased or decreased
based
on the incremental
assessment of these factors.
The Company
regularly re-evaluates
its practices in determining
the allowance
for loan losses. The
Company’s look-back
period each
quarter incorporates the effects
of at
least one economic downturn
in its loss history. The
Company believes
this look-back period
is appropriate
due to the risks inherent
in the loan
portfolio. Absent
this look-back period,
the early
cycle periods in
which the
Company experienced significant
losses would
be excluded
from the determination
of the
allowance for loan
losses and its
balance would
decrease. For the
quarter ended
September 30, 2022, the
Company
increased its look-back period
to 54 quarters
to continue to
include losses
incurred
by the
Company beginning
with the first
quarter of
2009. The Company
will likely continue
to increase its look-back period
to incorporate
the effects of
at least
one
economic downturn
in its loss history.
During
the quarter ended
June 30, 2021, the Company
adjusted certain qualitative
and economic factors,
previously
downgraded
as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic,
to reflect improvements in
economic
conditions in our
primary market
area.
Further adjustments
may be
made from time to time
in the
future as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic
and other economic changes.
Assessment for Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment of
Securities
On a quarterly
basis, management
makes an assessment to determine
whether there
have
been events
or economic
circumstances to indicate that
a
security on which
there is an
unrealized loss is other-than-temporarily
impaired.
For debt securities with
an unrealized
loss, an other-than-temporary
impairment write-down
is triggered when
(1) the
Company has
the intent to sell a
debt security, (2) it is more likely
than
not that the Company
will be required
to sell the
debt security before recovery
of its amortized cost basis,
or (3) the Company
does not expect to recover
the entire amortized
cost basis of the
debt security.
If the Company
has the intent
to sell a debt security
or if it
is more likely
than not
that it will
be required to sell the
debt security before recovery,
the other-than-temporary
write-down
is equal to
the entire difference
between the
debt security’s amortized cost and
its fair value.
If the Company
does not intend
to sell the security or it is not
more likely than
not that it will
be required to sell the
security before recovery, the
other-than-temporary
impairment write-
down is separated
into the
amount that
is credit related (credit loss component)
and
the amount due
to all other factors.
The
credit loss component is
recognized
in earnings
and is the difference between
the security’s amortized cost
basis and
the
present value of
its expected future
cash flows.
The remaining
difference between the
security’s fair value
and the present
value of future
expected cash
flows is due to
factors that are
not credit related and
is recognized in
other comprehensive
income, net of
applicable taxes.
The Company
is required to
own certain stock as
a condition of
membership, such
as the FHLB
of Atlanta
and Federal
Reserve Bank
of Atlanta
(“FRB”).
These non-marketable
equity securities are accounted
for at cost which
equals
par or
redemption value.
These securities do not
have a
readily determinable fair
value
as their ownership
is restricted and
there is
no market
for these securities.
The
Company records these
non-marketable equity
securities as
a
component of other
assets, which
are periodically evaluated
for impairment.
Management
considers these non-marketable
equity
securities to
be long-term investments.
Accordingly, when
evaluating
these securities for impairment,
management
considers the
ultimate recoverability of
the par
value rather than by
recognizing temporary
declines in value.