XML 29 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Long-lived assets
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]  
Long-lived assets
Note 11 – Long-lived assets
The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of the asset group is less than the carrying value of the asset group.
There is no set interval or frequency for recoverability evaluation rather when to determine when, if at all, an asset (or asset group) is evaluated for recoverability is based on “events and circumstances.” The following factors are examples of events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount of an asset (asset group) may not be recoverable and thus is to be evaluated for recoverability.
 
 
 
A significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group);
 
 
 
A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition;
 
 
 
A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
 
 
 
An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group);
 
 
 
A current period operating, or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group).
The Company determined there were no triggering events in the quarter ended June 30, 2020.
If the carrying amount of an asset or asset group (in use or under development) is evaluated and found not to be fully recoverable (the carrying amount exceeds the estimated gross, undiscounted cash flows from use and disposition), then an impairment loss must be recognized. The impairment loss is measured as the excess of the carrying amount over the
fair value of the asset (or asset group). The Company determined the “Asset Group” of the Company to be the assets of the Cancer Therapy segment and the Cancer Detection segment, which the Company considers to be the lowest level for which the identifiable cash flows were largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.
A considerable amount of judgment and assumptions are required in performing the impairment tests, principally in determining the fair value of the asset group and the reporting unit. While the Company believes
 that
the judgments and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions could change the estimated fair values and, therefore additional impairment charges could be required. Significant negative industry or economic trends, disruptions to the Company’s business, loss of significant customers, inability to effectively integrate acquired businesses, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in use of the assets may adversely impact the assumptions used in the fair value estimates and ultimately result in future impairment charges.