497 1 sit091439_497.htm FORM 497 Sit Mutual Funds Form 497

Sit Mutual Funds
Bond Funds Prospectus

Sit U.S. Government Securities Fund, Inc.
Sit Tax-Free Income Fund
Sit Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund

Supplement dated March 31, 2009 to the Bond Funds Prospectus dated August 1, 2008

On March 31, 2009, the Sit Money Market Fund, Inc. (“Money Market Fund”) was dissolved and liquidated pursuant to a Plan of Dissolution and Liquidation approved by the shareholders of the Fund at a special meeting of shareholders held on March 23, 2009.

All references to the Money Market Fund in the Prospectus dated August 1, 2008 should be deleted.







Part B
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

SIT U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES FUND, INC.
SIT MUTUAL FUNDS II, INC., comprised of:
SIT TAX-FREE INCOME FUND
SIT MINNESOTA TAX-FREE INCOME FUND

3300 IDS Center, 80 S. 8th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4130
612-334-5888
800-332-5580
www.sitfunds.com

This Statement of Additional Information is not a Prospectus. It should be read in conjunction with the Funds’ Prospectus. The financial statements included as part of the Funds’ Annual Report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 are incorporated by reference into this Statement of Additional Information. Copies of the Funds’ Prospectus and/or Annual Report may be obtained from the Funds without charge by contacting the Funds by telephone at (612) 334-5888 or (800) 332-5580 or by mail at 3300 IDS Center, 80 S. 8th Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4130, or by visiting the SEC website at www.sec.gov. This Statement of Additional Information is dated August 1, 2008, and supplemented on March 31, 2009 and is to be used with the Funds’ Prospectus dated August 1, 2008.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page

FUND BACKGROUND

2

 

ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

 

 

 

U.S. Government Securities Fund

3

 

 

Tax-Free Income Fund

3

 

 

Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund

4

 

ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT POLICIES & RISKS

 

 

 

Bank Obligations

5

 

 

Commercial Paper and other Corporate Debt Securities

6

 

 

Obligations of the U.S. Government

6

 

U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protection Securities

7

 

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations

7

 

Mortgage-Backed Securities

7

 

Manufactured Home Loans

9

 

Municipal Securities

9

 

Municipal Bonds

9

 

Municipal Notes

9

 

Municipal Commercial Paper

9

 

Municipal Leases

10

 

Housing Authority Bonds

10

 

Industrial Development Revenue Bonds

11

 

Health Care Facility Revenue Obligations

11

 

Minnesota Tax-Exempt Obligations

11

 

Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds

13

 

Futures Contracts, Options, Options on Futures Contracts, and Swap Agreements

13

 

Zero Coupon Securities

16

 

When Issued and Forward Commitment Securities

16

 

Repurchase Agreements

16

 

Illiquid Securities

17

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable and Floating Rate Notes

17

 

Ratings of Debt Securities

17

 

Risks of Investing in High Yield Securities

18

 

Diversification

19

 

Concentration Policy

19

 

Portfolio Turnover

19

 

Securities Lending

20

 

Duration

20

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT SELLING SHARES

21

 

Suspension of Selling Ability

21

 

Telephone Transactions

21

 

Redemption-In-Kind

21

 

COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE

21

 

MANAGEMENT

22

 

Portfolio Managers

25

 

Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Management Team

25

 

Compensation of Investment Professionals

25

 

Fund Shares Owned by Portfolio Management Team

26

 

Fund Shares Owned by Directors

26

 

Compensation of Directors

27

 

Code of Ethics

27

 

INVESTMENT ADVISER

28

 

DISTRIBUTOR

29

 

BROKERAGE

29

 

PROXY VOTING

31

 

DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

31

 

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

32

 

TAXES

33

 

CAPITALIZATION AND VOTING RIGHTS

35

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

36

 

OTHER INFORMATION

36

 

LIMITATION OF DIRECTOR LIABILITY

36

 

APPENDIX A - BOND AND COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS

38

 

APPENDIX B - MUNICIPAL BOND RATINGS

40

 


 

FUND BACKGROUND

Sit Mutual Funds are managed by Sit Investment Associates, Inc. (the “Adviser”). Sit Mutual Funds are comprised of twelve no-load funds. This Statement of Additional Information contains three bond funds, which are: U.S. Government Securities Fund, Tax-Free Income Fund, and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund, (collectively, the “Funds”). One bond fund, the Sit High Income Municipal Bond Fund, is described in a separate Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, and the eight stock funds within the Sit Mutual Fund family are described in a separate Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Each of the Funds (or the corporate issuer of their shares) is organized as a Minnesota corporation. The corporate issuer of the Tax-Free Income Fund, and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund (Sit Mutual Funds II, Inc.) was incorporated on May 18, 1984. The U.S. Government Securities Fund was incorporated on December 19, 1986.

 

ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

The investment objectives and investment strategies of the Funds are set forth in the Prospectus under “Fund Summaries.” Set forth below are the fundamental investment restrictions and policies applicable to the Funds, followed by the non-fundamental investment restrictions and policies. Those restrictions and policies designated as fundamental may not be

2


changed without shareholder approval. Shareholder approval, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, means the lesser of the vote of (a) 67% of the shares of a Fund at a meeting where more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are present in person or by proxy or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of a Fund. A percentage limitation must be met at the time of investment and a later deviation resulting from a change in values or net assets will not be a violation. Investment restrictions which prohibit the Funds from investing in real estate do not prohibit the Funds from owning real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or other actions taken with respect to real estate underlying securities held by the Funds.

 

U.S. Government Securities Fund

The Fund is subject to the following restrictions which are fundamental. The Fund will not:

 

 

1.

Purchase securities of any issuer except securities issued, guaranteed or insured by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities;

2.

Have any limitation with regard to concentration for the purchase of obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities;

3.

Invest in commodities, commodity contracts or interest rate future contracts; or purchase or sell real estate, although it may purchase and sell securities of companies which deal in real estate and may purchase and sell securities which are secured by interests in real estate;

4.

Make loans except by purchasing publicly distributed debt securities such as bonds, debentures and similar obligations;

5.

Purchase on margin or sell short except to obtain short-term credit as may be necessary for the clearance of transactions;

6.

Invest in repurchase agreements;

7.

Borrow money, except temporarily in emergency or extraordinary situations and then not for the purchase of investments and not in excess of 33 1/3% of the Fund’s total net assets;

8.

Underwrite the securities of other issuers;

9.

Invest in securities subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale or securities which are otherwise illiquid;

10.

Invest in exploration or development for oil, gas or other minerals;

11.

Issue senior securities as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940; or

12.

Invest in securities other than those issued, guaranteed or insured by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities.


The following investment restrictions of the Fund are not fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Directors of the Fund. The Fund will not:

 

 

1.

Pledge, mortgage, hypothecate or otherwise encumber the Fund’s assets except to the extent necessary to secure permitted borrowings;

2.

Invest more than 5% of the value of its total assets in the securities of any one investment company or more than 10% of the value of its total assets, in the aggregate, in the securities of two or more investment companies, or acquire more than 3% of the total outstanding voting securities of any one investment company, except a.) as part of a merger, consolidation, acquisition, or reorganization or b.) in a manner consistent with the requirements of an exemptive order issued to the Fund and/or the Adviser by the Securities and Exchange Commission; or

3.

Invest more than 5% of its net assets in put and call options on debt securities for the purpose of hedging.

 

Tax-Free Income Fund

The Tax-Free Income Fund is subject to the following restrictions which are fundamental. The Fund will not:

 

 

1.

Purchase on margin or sell short except to obtain short-term credit as may be necessary for the clearance of transactions and it may make margin deposits in connection with futures contracts;

2.

Invest in real estate, although it may invest in securities which are secured by or represent interests in real estate;

3.

Purchase or sell commodities or commodity contracts, provided that this restriction does not apply to index futures contracts, interest rate futures contracts or options on interest rate futures contracts for hedging;

4.

Make loans except by purchase of debt obligations (including repurchase agreements) in which it may invest consistent with its investment policies;

5.

Underwrite securities of other issuers except to the extent that, in connection with the disposition of its portfolio investments, it may be deemed to be an underwriter under federal securities laws;

6.

Write put or call options;

7.

Issue senior securities as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940;

8.

Invest in more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer;

3


 

 

9.

Invest more than 15% of its net assets collectively in all types of illiquid securities;

10.

Borrow money, except temporarily in emergency or extraordinary situations and then not for the purchase of investments and not in excess of 33 1/3% of the Fund’s total net assets,

11.

Invest less than 80% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in municipal securities that generate interest income exempt from both regular federal income tax and federal alternative minimum tax, during normal market conditions;

12.

Invest more than 20% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in municipal securities that generate interest income subject to regular federal income tax and federal alternative minimum tax (however, during periods of abnormal market conditions, the Fund may invest 100% of its assets in taxable obligations on a temporary basis for defensive purposes); or

13.

Invest more than 25% of its assets in the securities of issuers in any single industry, except that the Fund may invest without limitation in housing-related securities.

 

 

The following investment restrictions of the Fund are not fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Directors of the Fund. The Fund will not:

1.

Invest in oil, gas or other mineral leases, rights or royalty contracts, although it may invest in securities of companies investing in the foregoing;

2.

Invest more than 5% of the value of its total assets in the securities of any one investment company or more than 10% of the value of its total assets, in the aggregate, in the securities of two or more investment companies, or acquire more than 3% of the total outstanding voting securities of any one investment company, except a.) as part of a merger, consolidation, acquisition, or reorganization or b.) in a manner consistent with the requirements of an exemptive order issued to the Fund and/or the Adviser by the Securities and Exchange Commission;

3.

Invest for the purpose of exercising control or management;

4.

Invest more than 5% of its net assets in foreign securities, provided that the Fund may invest without limitation in tax-exempt securities issued by U.S. territorial possessions;

5.

Pledge, mortgage, hypothecate or otherwise encumber the Fund’s assets except to the extent necessary to secure permitted borrowings;

6.

Invest more than 25% of the Fund’s net assets in municipal securities rated below investment-grade (commonly referred to as junk bonds) at the time of purchase, or determined to be of comparable quality by the Fund’s investment adviser at the time of purchase; or

7.

Invest in securities rated lower than B3 by Moody’s Investors Service, or B- by Standard and Poor’s or Fitch Ratings or, if unrated, determined by the Fund’s investment adviser to be of comparable quality.

 

 

Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund

The Fund is subject to the following restrictions which are fundamental. The Fund will not:

1.

Invest in real estate, although it may invest in securities which are secured by or represent interests in real estate;

2.

Purchase or sell commodities or commodity contracts, provided that this restriction does not apply to index futures contracts, interest rate futures contracts or options on interest rate futures contracts for hedging;

3.

Make loans except by purchase of debt obligations (including repurchase agreements) in which it may invest consistent with its investment policies;

4.

Underwrite securities of other issuers except to the extent that, in connection with the disposition of its portfolio investments, it may be deemed to be an underwriter under federal securities laws;

5.

Borrow money, except temporarily in emergency or extraordinary situations and then not for the purchase of investments and not in excess of 33 1/3% of the Fund’s total net assets;

6.

Issue senior securities as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940;

7.

Invest more than 25% of its assets in the securities of issuers in any single industry, except that the Fund may invest without limitation in housing;.

8.

Invest less than 80% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in municipal securities that generate interest income exempt from regular federal income tax, federal alternative minimum tax, and Minnesota regular personal income tax, during normal market conditions; or

9.

Invest more than 20% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in municipal securities that generate interest income subject to regular federal income tax, federal alternative minimum tax or Minnesota regular personal income tax (however, during periods of abnormal market conditions, the Fund may invest 100% of its assets in taxable obligations on a temporary basis for defensive purposes).

4


 

 

The following investment restrictions of the Fund are not fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Directors of the Fund. The Fund will not:

1.

Purchase on margin or sell short, except to obtain short-term credit as may be necessary for the clearance of transactions and it may make margin deposits in connection with futures contracts;

2.

Invest more than 5% of the value of its total assets in the securities of any one investment company or more than 10% of the value of its total assets, in the aggregate, in the securities of two or more investment companies, or acquire more than 3% of the total outstanding voting securities of any one investment company, except a.) as part of a merger, consolidation, acquisition, or reorganization or b.) in a manner consistent with the requirements of an exemptive order issued to the Fund and/or the Adviser by the Securities and Exchange Commission;

3.

Write put options;

4.

Invest more than 5% of its net assets in foreign securities, provided that the Fund may invest without limitation in tax-exempt securities issued by U.S. territorial possessions;

5.

Invest more than 15% of its net assets collectively in all types of illiquid securities;

8.

Invest in oil, gas or other mineral leases, rights or royalty contracts, although it may invest in securities of companies investing in the foregoing;

9.

Pledge, mortgage, hypothecate or otherwise encumber the Fund’s assets except to the extent necessary to secure permitted borrowings;

10.

Invest more than 30% of the Fund’s net assets in municipal securities rated below investment-grade (commonly referred to as junk bonds) at the time of purchase or determined to be of comparable quality by the Fund’s investment adviser at the time of purchase; or

11.

Invest in securities rated lower than B3 by Moody’s Investors Service, or B- by Standard and Poor’s or Fitch Ratings or, if unrated, determined by the Fund’s investment adviser to be of comparable quality.


 

ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT POLICIES & RISKS

 

Bank Obligations

Each Fund may invest in bank obligations, either as a principal investment strategy or for temporary defensive purposes. These include certificates of deposit, including variable rate certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and time deposits. “Bank” includes commercial banks, savings banks and savings and loan associations.

Certificates of deposit are generally short-term, interest-bearing negotiable certificates issued by commercial banks or savings and loan associations against funds deposited in the issuing institution. The Funds may invest in Eurodollar certificates of deposit subject to the 25% limitation for concentration in any one industry. Eurodollar certificates of deposit are negotiable deposits denominated in U.S. dollars on deposit with foreign branches of U.S. banks which have a specified maturity.

Variable rate certificates of deposit are certificates of deposit on which the interest rate is periodically adjusted prior to their stated maturity, usually at 30, 90 or 180 day intervals (“coupon dates”), based upon a specified market rate, which is tied to the then prevailing certificate of deposit rate, with some premium paid because of the longer final maturity date of the variable rate certificate of deposit. As a result of these adjustments, the interest rate on these obligations may be increased or decreased periodically. Variable rate certificates of deposit normally carry a higher interest rate than fixed rate certificates of deposit with shorter maturities, because the bank issuing the variable rate certificate of deposit pays the investor a premium as the bank has the use of the investors’ money for a longer period of time. Variable rate certificates of deposit can be sold in the secondary market.

In addition, frequently banks or dealers sell variable rate certificates of deposit and simultaneously agree, either formally or informally, to repurchase such certificates, at the option of the purchaser of the certificate, at par on the coupon dates. In connection with a Fund’s purchase of variable rate certifies of deposit, it may enter into formal or informal agreements with banks or dealers allowing the Fund to resell the certificates to the bank or dealer, at the Fund’s option. If the agreement to repurchase is informal, there can be no assurance that the Fund would always be able to resell such certificates. Before entering into any such transactions governed by formal agreements, however, the Fund will comply with the provisions of SEC Release 10666 which generally provides that the repurchase agreement must be fully collateralized.

5


A banker’s acceptance is a time draft drawn on a commercial bank by a borrower usually in connection with an international commercial transaction (to finance the import, export, transfer or storage of goods). The borrower is liable for payment as well as the bank, which unconditionally guarantees to pay the draft at its face amount on the maturity date. Most acceptances have maturities of six months or less and are traded in secondary markets prior to maturity.

The Funds may invest in time deposits. Time deposits are deposits held in foreign branches of U.S. banks which have a specified term or maturity. Time deposits are similar to certificates of deposit, except they are not transferable, and are, therefore, illiquid prior to their maturity.

Both domestic banks and foreign branches of domestic banks are subject to extensive, but different, governmental regulations which may limit both the amount and types of loans which may be made and interest rates which may be charged. In addition, the profitability of the banking industry is largely dependent upon the availability and cost of funds for the purpose of financing lending operations under prevailing short-term debt conditions. General economic conditions, as well as exposure to credit losses arising from possible financial difficulties of borrowers, also play an important part in the operations of the banking industry.

The bank money market instruments in which the Funds invest may be issued by U.S. commercial banks, foreign branches of U.S. commercial banks, foreign banks and U.S. and foreign branches of foreign banks. As a result of federal and state laws and regulations, domestic banks are, among other things, generally required to maintain specified levels of reserves, limited in the amount which they can loan to a single borrower, and are subject to other regulations designed to promote financial soundness. Since the Funds’ portfolios may contain securities of foreign banks and foreign branches of domestic banks, the Funds may be subject to additional investment risks that are different in some respects from those incurred by a fund that invests only in debt obligations of domestic banks.

The Funds only purchase certificates of deposit from savings and loan institutions which are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank and are insured by the Savings Association Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Such savings and loan associations are subject to regulation and examination. Unlike most savings accounts, certificates of deposit held by the Funds do not benefit materially from insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Certificates of deposit of foreign branches of domestic banks are not covered by such insurance and certificates of deposit of domestic banks purchased by the Funds are generally in denominations far in excess of the dollar limitations on insurance coverage.

 

Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Corporate Debt Securities

The Funds may, for temporary defensive purposes, purchase short-term corporate debt instruments that consist of commercial paper (including variable amount master demand notes), which refers to short-term, unsecured promissory notes issued by corporations to finance short-term credit needs. Commercial paper is usually sold on a discount basis and has a maturity at the time of issuance not exceeding nine months. Variable amount master demand notes are demand obligations that permit the investment of fluctuating amounts at varying market rates of interest pursuant to arrangements between the issuer and a commercial bank acting as agent for the payees of such notes, whereby both parties have the right to vary the amount of the outstanding indebtedness of the notes.

Other short-term corporate debt obligations may include fixed interest rate non-convertible corporate debt securities (i.e., bonds and debentures) with no more than 397 days remaining to maturity at date of settlement.

 

Obligations of, or Guaranteed by, the United States Government, its Agencies or Instrumentalities

Each Fund may invest in obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities. Securities issued or guaranteed by the United States include a variety of Treasury securities, which differ only in their interest rates, maturities and dates of issuance. Treasury bills have a maturity of one year or less. Treasury notes have maturities of one to ten years and Treasury bonds generally have maturities of greater than ten years at the date of issuance.

The Prospectus also refers to securities that are issued or guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government and various instrumentalities which have been established or sponsored by the U.S. government. These U.S. government obligations, even those which are guaranteed by federal agencies or instrumentalities, may or may not be backed by the “full faith and credit” of the United States. In the case of securities not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, the investor

6


must look principally to the agency issuing or guaranteeing the obligation for ultimate repayment and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself in the event the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitment.

Some of the government agencies which issue or guarantee securities which the Funds may purchase include the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Government National Mortgage Association, the Farmers Home Administration, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Defense and the Department of Commerce. Instrumentalities which issue or guarantee securities include the Export-Import Bank, the Federal Farm Credit System, Federal Land Banks, the Federal Intermediate Credit Bank, the Bank for Cooperatives, Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Student Loan Marketing Association. The U.S. Treasury is not obligated by law to provide support to all U.S. government instrumentalities and agencies, and the Funds will invest in securities which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury issued by such instrumentalities and agencies only when the Funds’ Adviser determines that the credit risk with respect to the instrumentality or agency issuing such securities does not make its securities unsuitable investments for the Funds.

The Funds may purchase securities that are insured but not issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities. An example of such a security is a housing revenue bond (the interest on which is subject to federal taxation) issued by a state and insured by an FHA mortgage loan.

U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protection Securities. One type of U.S. government obligations is U.S. Treasury inflation-protection securities. The U.S. Government Securities Fund may invest in U.S. Treasury inflation-protection securities which are marketable book-entry securities issued by the United States Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) with a nominal return linked to the inflation rate in consumer prices. The index used to measure inflation is the non-seasonably adjusted U.S. City Average All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.

The principal value of an inflation-protection security is adjusted for inflation, and every six months the security pays interest, which is an amount equal to a fixed percentage of the inflation-adjusted value of the principal. The final payment of principal of the security will not be less than the original par amount of the security at issuance. Some inflation-protection securities may be stripped into principal and interest components.

 

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs)

The U.S. Government Securities Fund may invest in CMOs. CMOs are hybrid instruments with characteristics of both mortgage-backed bonds and mortgage pass-through securities. CMOs are commonly referred to as derivative securities. Similar to a bond, interest and prepaid principal on a CMO is paid, in most cases, semiannually. CMOs may be collateralized by whole mortgage loans, but are more typically collateralized by portfolios of mortgage pass-through securities guaranteed by GNMA, FHLMC, or FNMA. CMOs are structured into multiple classes, each bearing a different stated maturity. Monthly payments of principal, including prepayments, are first returned to investors holding the shortest maturity class; investors holding the longer maturity classes receive principal only after the first class has been retired. CMOs that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or by any of its agencies or instrumentalities will be considered U.S. Government securities by the Funds, while other CMOs, even if collateralized by U.S. Government securities, will have the same status as other privately issued securities for purposes of applying each Fund’s diversification tests.

In a typical CMO transaction, a corporation (“issuer”) issues multiple series (“A, B, C, Z”) of CMO bonds (“Bonds”). Proceeds of the Bond offering are used to purchase mortgage instruments or mortgage pass-through certificates (“Collateral”). The Collateral is pledged to a third party trustee as security for the Bonds. Principal and interest payments from the Collateral are used to pay principal on the bonds in the order A, B, C, Z. The Series A, B, and C Bonds all bear current interest. Interest on the Series Z Bond is accrued and added to principal and a like amount is paid as principal on the Series A, B, or C Bond currently being paid off. When the Series A, B, and C Bonds are paid in full, interest and principal on the Series Z Bond begin to be paid currently. With some CMOs, the issuer serves as a conduit to allow loan originators (primarily builders or savings and loan associations) to borrow against their loan portfolios.

 

Mortgage-Backed Securities

The mortgage-backed securities in which the U.S. Government Securities Fund invest provide funds for mortgage loans made to residential home buyers. These include securities which represent interests in pools of mortgage loans made by

7


lenders such as savings and loan institutions, mortgage banks, commercial banks and insurance companies. Pools of mortgage loans are assembled for sale to investors such as the Funds by various private, governmental and government-related organizations.

Interests in pools of mortgage-backed securities differ from other forms of debt securities, which normally provide for periodic payment of interest in fixed amounts with principal payments at maturity or specified call dates. Mortgage-backed securities provide monthly payments which consist of both interest and principal payments to the investor. In effect, these payments are a “pass-through” of the monthly payments made by the individual borrowers on their residential mortgage loans, net of any fees paid to the issuer or guarantor of such securities. Additional payments are caused by repayments of principal resulting from the sale of the underlying residential property, refinancing or foreclosure, net of fees or costs which may be incurred. Some mortgage-backed securities, i.e., GNMA’s, are described as “modified pass-through.” These securities entitle the holders to receive all interest and principal payments owed on the mortgages in the pool, net of certain fees, regardless of whether or not the mortgagors actually make the payments.

The principal government guarantor of mortgage-backed securities is the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”). GNMA is a wholly-owned U.S. government corporation within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. GNMA is authorized to guarantee, with the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, the timely payment of principal and interest on securities issued by approved institutions and backed by pools of FHA-insured or VA-guaranteed mortgages.

Residential mortgage loans are pooled by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”). FHLMC is a corporate instrumentality of the U.S. government and was created by Congress in 1970 for the purpose of increasing the availability of mortgage credit for residential housing. Its stock is owned by the twelve Federal Home Loan Banks. FHLMC issues Participation Certificates (“PC’s”) which represent interest in mortgages from FHLMC’s national portfolio. FHLMC guarantees the timely payment of interest and ultimate collection of principal; however, PC’s are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

The Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) is a government sponsored corporation owned entirely by private stockholders. It is subject to general regulation by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. FNMA purchases residential mortgages from a list of approved seller/servicers which include state and federally-chartered savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, commercial banks and credit unions and mortgage banks. Pass-through securities issued by FNMA are guaranteed as to timely payment of principal and interest by FNMA, but are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

The Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) was established by Congress in 1934 under the National Housing Act. A major purpose of the Act was to encourage the flow of private capital into residential financing on a protected basis. FHA is authorized to insure mortgage loans, primarily those related to residential housing. FHA does not make loans and does not plan or build housing. FHA Project Pools are pass-through securities representing undivided interests in pools of FHA-insured multi-family project mortgage loans.

The Funds may purchase securities which are insured but not issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities. An example of such a security is a housing revenue bond (the interest on which is subject to federal taxation) issued by a state and insured by an FHA mortgage loan. This type of mortgage is insured by FHA pursuant to the provisions of Section 221(d)(4) of the National Housing Act of 1934, as amended. After a mortgagee files a claim for insurance benefits, FHA will pay insurance benefits up to 100% of the unpaid principal amount of the mortgage (generally 70% of the amount is paid within six months of the claim and the remainder within the next six months). The risks associated with this type of security are the same as other mortgage securities -- prepayment and/or redemption prior to maturity, loss of premium (if paid) if the security is redeemed prior to maturity and fluctuation in principal value due to an increase or decrease in interest rates.

The average life of pass-through pools varies with the maturities of the underlying mortgage instruments. In addition, the pool’s term may be shortened by unscheduled or early payments of principal and interest on the underlying mortgages. The occurrence of mortgage prepayment is affected by factors including the level of interest rates, general economic conditions, the location and age of the mortgage and other social and demographic conditions.

8


As prepayment rates of individual pools vary widely, it is not possible to accurately predict the average life of a particular pool. Mortgage pass-through securities which receive regular principal payments have an average life less than their maturity. The average life of mortgage pass-through investments will typically vary from 1 to 18 years.

Yields on pass-through mortgage-backed securities are typically quoted based on the maturity of the underlying instruments and the associated average life assumption. Actual prepayment experience may cause the yield to differ from the assumed average life yield. The compounding effect from reinvestments of monthly payments received by the Fund will increase the yield to shareholders.

 

Manufactured Home Loans

The U.S. Government Securities Fund invests in GNMA manufactured home loan pass-through securities. Manufactured home loans are fixed-rate loans secured by a manufactured home unit. In certain instances the loan may be collateralized by a combination of a manufactured home unit and a developed lot of land upon which the unit can be placed. Manufactured home loans are generally not mortgages; however, because of the structural and operational similarities with mortgage backed pass-through securities and the role of GNMA, industry practice often groups the securities within the spectrum of GNMA mortgage backed pass-through securities for listing purposes. Manufactured home loans have key characteristics different from mortgage-backed securities including different prepayment rates. Prepayment rates tend to fluctuate with interest rates and other economic variables. Manufactured home loan prepayment rates generally tend to be less volatile than the prepayment rates experienced by mortgage-backed securities. See the above discussion regarding mortgage-backed securities.

 

Municipal Securities

The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund invest in the municipal securities described below. To a limited extent, the U.S. Government Securities Fund also may invest in such securities. The yields on municipal securities are dependent on a variety of factors, including the general level of interest rates, the financial condition of the issuer, general conditions of the tax-exempt securities market, the size of the issue, the maturity of the obligation and the rating of the issue. Ratings are general, and not absolute, standards of quality. Consequently, securities of the same maturity, interest rate and rating may have different yields, while securities of the same maturity and interest rate with different ratings may have the same yield.

Certain types of municipal bonds are issued to obtain funding for privately operated facilities (“private activity” bonds). Under current tax law, interest income earned by the Funds from certain private activity bonds is an item of “tax preference” which is subject to the alternative minimum tax when received by a shareholder in a tax year during which the shareholder is subject to the alternative minimum tax.

Municipal securities in which the Funds invest include securities that are issued by a state or its agencies, instrumentalities, municipalities and political subdivisions, or by territories or possessions of the United States. Tax-exempt municipal securities include municipal bonds, municipal notes, municipal commercial paper, and municipal leases.

Municipal Bonds. The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest in municipal bonds. Municipal bonds generally have maturities at the time of issuance ranging from one to thirty years, or more. Municipal bonds are issued to raise money for various public purposes. The two principal types of municipal bonds are general obligation bonds and revenue bonds. The Funds may invest in both in any proportion. General obligation bonds are secured by the full faith, credit and taxing power of the issuing municipality and not from any particular fund or revenue source. Revenue bonds are backed only from the revenues derived from a facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise or other specific revenue source and not from the general taxing power.

Municipal Notes. The Minnesota Tax-Free Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest in municipal notes. Municipal notes generally mature in three months to three years.

Municipal Commercial Paper. The Minnesota Tax-Free Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest in municipal commercial paper. Municipal commercial paper generally matures in one year or less.

9


Municipal Leases. The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest up to 25% of their net assets in municipal lease obligations. Municipal lease obligations are issued by state and local governments or authorities to finance the acquisition of equipment and facilities. Municipal leases may take the form of a lease, an installment purchase contract, a conditional sales contract or a participation certificate in any of the above. In determining leases in which the Funds will invest, the Adviser will carefully evaluate the outstanding credit rating of the issuer (and the probable secondary market acceptance of such credit rating). Additionally, the Adviser may require that certain municipal lease obligations be issued or backed by a letter of credit or put arrangement with an independent financial institution.

Municipal leases frequently have special risks not normally associated with general obligation or revenue bonds. The constitutions and statutes of all states contain requirements that the state or a municipality must meet to incur debt. These often include voter referendum, interest rate limits and public sale requirements. Leases and installment purchase or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title to the leased asset to pass eventually to the governmental issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. The debt-issuance limitations are deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion in many leases or contracts of “nonappropriation” clauses that provide that the governmental issuer has no obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purpose by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis.

In addition to the “nonappropriation” risk, municipal leases have additional risk aspects because they represent a relatively new type of financing that has not yet developed the depth of marketability associated with conventional bonds; moreover, although the obligations will be secured by the leased equipment, the disposition of the equipment in the event of non-appropriation or foreclosure might, in some cases, prove difficult. In addition, in certain instances the tax-exempt status of the obligations will not be subject to the legal opinion of a nationally recognized “bond counsel,” as is customarily required in larger issues of municipal securities.

Municipal lease obligations, except in certain circumstances, are considered illiquid by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Municipal lease obligations held by a Fund will be treated as illiquid unless they are determined to be liquid pursuant to guidelines established by the Fund’s Board of Directors. Under these guidelines, the Adviser will consider factors including, but not limited to 1) whether the lease can be canceled, 2) what assurance there is that the assets represented by the lease can be sold, 3) the issuer’s general credit strength (e.g. its debt, administrative, economic and financial characteristics), 4) the likelihood that the municipality will discontinue appropriating funding for the leased property because the property is no longer deemed essential to the operations of the municipality (e.g. the potential for an “event of non-appropriation”), and 5) the legal recourse in the event of failure to appropriate.

Housing Authority Bonds. The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest without limitation in obligations of municipal housing authorities which include both single-family and multifamily mortgage revenue bonds. Weaknesses in federal housing subsidy programs and their administration may result in a decrease of subsidies available for payment of principal and interest on multifamily housing authority bonds. Economic developments, including fluctuations in interest rates and increasing construction and operating costs, may also adversely impact revenues of housing authorities. In the case of some housing authorities, inability to obtain additional financing could also reduce revenues available to pay existing obligations. Mortgage revenue bonds are subject to extraordinary mandatory redemption at par in whole or in part from the proceeds derived from prepayments of underlying mortgage loans and also from the unused proceeds of the issue within a stated period of time.

The exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes of certain housing authority bonds depends on qualification under relevant provisions of the Code and on other provisions of federal law. These provisions of federal law contain certain ongoing requirements relating to the cost and location of the residences financed with the proceeds of the single family mortgage bonds and the income levels of occupants of the housing units financed with the proceeds of the single and multifamily housing bonds. While the issuers of the bonds, and other parties, including the originators and servicers of the single family mortgages and the owners of the rental projects financed with the multifamily housing bonds, covenant to meet these ongoing requirements and generally agree to institute procedures designed to insure that these requirements are met, there can be no assurance that these ongoing requirements will be consistently met. The failure to meet these requirements could cause the interest on the bonds to become taxable, possibly retroactively from

10


the date of issuance, thereby reducing the value of the bonds, subjecting shareholders to unanticipated tax liabilities and possibly requiring the Fund to sell the bonds at the reduced value. Furthermore, any failure to meet these ongoing requirements might not constitute an event of default under the applicable mortgage which might otherwise permit the holder to accelerate payment of the bond or require the issuer to redeem the bond. In any event, where the mortgage is insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), the consent of the FHA may be required before insurance proceeds would become payable to redeem the mortgage subsidy bonds.

Industrial Development Revenue Bonds. The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest up to 25% of their net assets in industrial development revenue bonds, however, the Adviser does not currently intend to invest more than 15% of each Fund’s net assts in industrial development revenue bonds. Industrial development revenue bonds (“revenue bonds”) are usually payable only out of a specific revenue source rather than from general revenues of the governmental entity. In addition, revenue bonds ordinarily are not backed by the faith, credit or general taxing power of the issuing governmental entity. Instead, the principal and interest on revenue bonds for private facilities are typically paid out of rents or other specified payments made to the issuing governmental entity by a private company which uses or operates the facilities. Revenue bonds which are not backed by the credit of the issuing governmental entity frequently provide a higher rate of return than other municipal obligations, but they entail greater risk than obligations which are guaranteed by a governmental unit with taxing power. The credit quality of industrial development bonds is usually directly related to the credit standing of the user of the facilities or the credit standing of a third-party guarantor or other credit enhancement participant, if any.

Health Care Facility Revenue Obligations. The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest up to 25% of its assets in health care facility bonds which include obligations of issuers whose revenues are derived from services provided by hospitals or other health care facilities, including nursing homes. Ratings of bonds issued for health care facilities are sometimes based on feasibility studies that contain projections of occupancy levels, revenues and expenses. A facility’s gross receipts and net income available for debt service may be affected by future events and conditions including, among other things, demand for services, the ability of the facility to provide the services required, an increasing shortage of qualified nurses or a dramatic rise in nursing salaries, physicians’ confidence in the facility, management capabilities, economic developments in the service area, competition from other similar providers, efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates, legislation establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, government regulation, the cost and possible unavailability of malpractice insurance, and the termination or restriction of governmental financial assistance, including that associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third-party payor programs. Medicare reimbursements are currently calculated on a prospective basis and are not based on a provider’s actual costs. Such method of reimbursement may adversely affect reimbursements to hospitals and other facilities for services provided under the Medicare program and thereby may have an adverse effect on the ability of such institutions to satisfy debt service requirements. In the event of a default upon a bond secured by hospital facilities, the limited alternative uses for such facilities may result in the recovery upon such collateral not providing sufficient funds to fully repay the bonds. Certain hospital bonds provide for redemption at par upon the damage, destruction or condemnation of the hospital facilities or in other special circumstances.

Minnesota Tax-Exempt Obligations. The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund, except during temporary defensive periods, will invest primarily in Minnesota tax-exempt obligations, which include obligations of the State of Minnesota or a political subdivision, municipality, agency or instrumentality of the State of Minnesota. This Fund therefore is susceptible to political, economic and regulatory factors affecting issuers of Minnesota tax-exempt obligations. The following information provides only a brief summary of the complex factors affecting the financial situation in Minnesota. The information is based primarily upon one or more publicly available offering statements relating to debt offerings of the State of Minnesota and releases issued by the Minnesota Department of Finance; the information has not been updated, however, from that provided by the State, and it will not be updated during the year. The Fund has not independently verified the information. It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local Minnesota issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the State of Minnesota, and that there is no obligation on the part of Minnesota to make payment on such local obligations in the event of default.

Minnesota’s constitutionally prescribed fiscal period is a biennium, and Minnesota operates on a biennial budget basis. Legislative appropriations for each biennium are prepared and adopted during the final legislative session of the immediately preceding biennium. Prior to each fiscal year of a biennium, Minnesota’s Department of Finance allots a portion of the

11


applicable biennial appropriation to each agency or other entity for which an appropriation has been made. An agency or other entity may not expend moneys in excess of its allotment. If revenues are insufficient to balance total available resources and expenditures, Minnesota’s Commissioner of Finance, with the approval of the Governor, is required to reduce allotments to the extent necessary to balance expenditures and forecasted available resources for the then current biennium. The Governor may prefer legislative action when a large reduction in expenditures appears necessary, and if Minnesota’s legislature is not in session the Governor is empowered to convene a special session.

Diversity and a significant natural resource base are two important characteristics of the Minnesota economy. Generally, the structure of the State’s economy parallels the structure of the United States economy as a whole. There are, however, employment concentrations in the manufacturing categories of fabricated metals, machinery, computers and electronics, and food. Historically, the State’s unemployment rate had consistently been less than the national unemployment rate, but since the beginning of January 2007 Minnesota’s unemployment rate has been greater than or equal to the U.S. average in about half of the months. Since 1980, Minnesota per capita income generally has remained above the national average. In 2007, Minnesota per capita personal income was 106.3 percent of its U.S. counterpart.

The State relies heavily on a progressive individual income tax and a retail sales tax for revenue, which results in a fiscal system that is sensitive to economic conditions. During the first half of 2003, the State addressed substantial projected budget deficits by substantially reducing projected spending, including aid to local government and higher education, transferring funds from other accounts, deferring certain expenditures and transfers, in some cases by borrowing funds, deferring certain sales tax refunds, and raising fees. On February 27, 2004, the Minnesota Department of Finance released an Economic Forecast projecting, under then current laws, a general fund deficit of $160 million for the biennium ending June 30, 2005. A forecasted deficit is not automatically reduced by the budget reserve, because gubernatorial or legislative action is required to access the reserve. Minnesota’s Constitution prohibits borrowing for operating purposes beyond the end of a biennium, but the Commissioner of Finance, with the approval of the Governor, has statutory authority in the event of a projected deficit to release reserve funds and reduce unexpended allotments of prior transfers and appropriations. The State legislature adjourned its 2004 regular session without substantially reducing the projected deficit, but the Governor exercised his statutory powers to eliminate the projected deficit, primarily through reductions in spending. On February 28, 2005, the Department of Finance released an updated Economic Forecast projecting, under then current laws, a general fund balance of $175 million for the biennium ending June 30, 2005, but, after reflecting legislatively mandated allocations of this surplus to restoring the State’s budget reserve to $653 million and reversing some shifts in the timing of school aid payments, the projected balance was reduced to zero. The Department also forecast a $466 million General Fund shortfall for the biennium ending June 30, 2007, after allowing for a $350 million cash flow account and a $653 million budget reserve, based on projected expenditures of $30.2 billion. The State enacted legislation to eliminate the shortfall, largely relying on a new cigarette fee and a variety of tax increases.

The General Fund had a substantial unrestricted surplus of $1.1 billion at the end of the last biennium, June 30, 2007. The Department of Finance February 2008 Forecast, however, projected a $935 million (2.7%) General Fund deficit for June 30, 2009, after reducing the projected $68 million unreserved balance by the statutorily mandated $653 million budget reserve and $350 million cash flow account. Legislation was enacted to increase revenues by $206 million, reduce overall spending by $125 million, transfer $110 million of funds from certain non-general funds, and reduce the budget reserve by $500 million to $153 million. As a result, end of session estimates projected a $6 million unrestricted General Fund balance for June 30, 2009, based on expenditures of $34.593 billion, after reducing the projected $509 unreserved balance by the $153 million budget reserve and the $350 million cash flow account. Planning estimates for the next biennium ending June 30, 2011, reflecting the legislation, indicated that projected revenues would fall short of projected expenditures by $946 million, not taking into account any balances carried forward from the current biennium. While wage and price inflation is included in revenue planning estimates, State law prohibits using a general inflation adjustment to project expenditures. A general inflation adjustment of 1.9% each fiscal year would add $1.041 billion to expenditures for the next biennium. In its subsequent July 2008 Economic Update, the Department of Finance reported that revenues for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 were substantially greater than previously forecast, but also stated that economic forecasts for the current fiscal year are more pessimistic than those previously used. The Minnesota Council of Economic Advisors has, for some time, urged the State to increase its budget reserve substantially to 5 percent of biennial spending.

12


The State is a party to a variety of civil actions that could adversely affect the State’s General Fund. In addition, substantial portions of State and local revenues are derived from federal expenditures, and reductions in federal aid to the State and its political subdivisions and other federal spending cuts may have substantial adverse effects on the economic and fiscal condition of the State and its local governmental units. Risks are inherent in making revenue and expenditure forecasts. Economic or fiscal conditions less favorable than those reflected in State budget forecasts may create additional budgetary pressures.

State grants and aids represent a large percentage of the total revenues of cities, towns, counties and school districts in Minnesota, so State budgetary difficulties may have substantial adverse effects on such local government units. Generally, the State has no obligation to make payments on local obligations in the event of a default. Accordingly, factors in addition to the State’s financial and economic condition will affect the creditworthiness of Minnesota tax-exempt obligations that are not backed by the full faith and credit of the State. Even with respect to revenue obligations, no assurance can be given that economic or other fiscal difficulties and the resultant impact on State and local government finances will not adversely affect the ability of the respective obligors to make timely payment of the principal of and interest on Minnesota tax-exempt obligations that are held by the Fund or the value or marketability of such obligations.

Certain Minnesota tax legislation (see TAXES, Minnesota Income Taxation – Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund) and possible future changes in federal and State income tax laws, including rate reductions, could adversely affect the value and marketability of Minnesota tax-exempt obligations that are held by the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund.

 

Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds

Each Fund, except U.S. Government Securities Fund, may invest in tobacco settlement asset backed bonds. The master settlement agreement of 1998 between the four major tobacco companies and 46 U.S. States, the District of Columbia, and several U.S. territories provides that the tobacco companies will pay more than $200 billion to the governmental entities over 25 years. Several governmental entities have securitized the future flow of these payments by selling bonds pursuant to indentures through distinct entities created by the governmental entity for such purpose. The bonds are backed by the future revenue flow that is used for principal and interest payments on the bonds. Payment on the Bonds, and thus risk to the Funds, is dependent on the receipt of future settlement payments to the governmental entities. The actual amount of future settlement payments is dependent on many factors, including but not limited to, cigarette consumption and the financial capability of participating tobacco companies.

 

Futures Contracts, Options, Options on Futures Contracts, and Swap Agreements

The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund and the Tax-Free Income Fund may invest in interest rate futures contracts, index futures contracts and may buy options on such contracts for the purpose of hedging its portfolio of fixed income securities (and not for speculative purposes) against the adverse effects of anticipated movements in interest rates. The U.S. Government Securities Fund may buy and sell options on interest rate futures contracts and index futures contracts for the purpose of hedging. As a result of entering into futures contracts, no more than 10% of any Fund’s (5% for Tax-Free Income Fund’s) total assets may be committed to margin.

An interest rate futures contract is an agreement to purchase or deliver an agreed amount of debt securities in the future for a stated price on a certain date. The Funds may use interest rate futures solely as a defense or hedge against anticipated interest rate changes and not for speculation. A Fund presently could accomplish a similar result to that which it hopes to achieve through the use of futures contracts by selling debt securities with long maturities and investing in debt securities with short maturities when interest rates are expected to increase, or conversely, selling short-term debt securities and investing in long-term debt securities when interest rates are expected to decline. However, because of the liquidity that is often available in the futures market, such protection is more likely to be achieved, perhaps at a lower cost and without changing the rate of interest being earned by the Fund, through using futures contracts.

Each Fund may purchase and sell exchange traded put and call options on debt securities of an amount up to 5% of its net assets (10% for Bond Fund) for the purpose of hedging. The Funds may, from time to time, write exchange-traded call options on debt securities, but the Funds will not write put options. A put option (sometimes called a standby commitment) gives the purchaser of the option, in return for a premium paid, the right to sell the underlying security at a specified price during the term of the option. The writer of the put option receives the premium and has the obligation to buy the underlying securities upon exercise at the exercise price during the option period. A call option (sometimes called a reverse standby

13


commitment) gives the purchaser of the option, in return for a premium, the right to buy the security underlying the option at a specified exercise price at any time during the term of the option. The writer of the call option receives the premium and has the obligation at the exercise of the option, to deliver the underlying security against payment of the exercise price during the option period. A principal risk of standby commitments is that the writer of a commitment may default on its obligation to repurchase or deliver the securities.

Description of Futures Contracts. A futures contract sale creates an obligation by the Fund, as seller, to deliver the type of financial instrument called for in the contract at a specified future time for a stated price. A futures contract purchase creates an obligation by the Fund, as purchaser, to take delivery of the underlying financial instrument at a specified future time for a stated price. The specific securities delivered or taken, respectively, at settlement date, are not determined until at or near that date. The determination is made in accordance with the rules of the exchange on which the futures contract sale or purchase was made.

Although futures contracts by their terms call for actual delivery or acceptance of securities, in most cases the contracts are closed out before the settlement date without the making or taking of delivery. Closing out a futures contract sale is effected by purchasing a futures contract for the same aggregate amount of the specific type of financial instrument and the same delivery date. If the price of the initial sale of the futures contract exceeds the price of the offsetting purchase, the Fund is paid the difference and realizes a gain. If the price of the offsetting purchase exceeds the price of the initial sale, the Fund pays the difference and realizes a loss. Similarly, the closing out of a futures contract purchase is effected by the Fund entering into a futures contract sale. If the offsetting sale price exceeds the purchase price, the Fund realizes a gain, and if the purchase price exceeds the offsetting sale price, the Fund realizes a loss.

The Funds are required to maintain margin deposits with brokerage firms through which they enter into futures contracts. Margin balances will be adjusted at least weekly to reflect unrealized gains and losses on open contracts. In addition, the Funds will pay a commission on each contract, including offsetting transactions.

Futures contracts are traded only on commodity exchanges--known as “contract markets”--approved for such trading by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and must be executed through a futures commission merchant or brokerage firm which is a member of the relevant contract market. The CFTC regulates trading activity on the exchanges pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act. The principal exchanges are the Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the New York Futures Exchange. Each exchange guarantees performance under contract provisions through a clearing corporation, a nonprofit organization managed by the exchange membership. The CFTC has adopted Rule 4.5, which provides an exclusion from the definition of commodity pool operator for any registered investment company which files a notice of eligibility.

Risks in Futures Contracts. One risk in employing futures contracts to protect against cash market price volatility is the prospect that futures prices will correlate imperfectly with the behavior of cash prices. The ordinary spreads between prices in the cash and futures markets, due to differences in the natures of those markets, are subject to distortions. First, all participants in the futures market are subject to margin deposit and maintenance requirements. Rather than meeting additional margin deposit requirements, investors may close futures contracts through offsetting transactions which could distort the normal relationship between the cash and futures markets. Second, the liquidity of the futures market depends on participants entering into offsetting transactions rather than making or taking delivery. To the extent participants decide to make or take delivery, liquidity in the futures market could be reduced, thus producing distortion. Third, from the point of view of speculators the deposit requirements in the futures market are less onerous than margin requirements in the securities market. Therefore, increased participation by speculators in the futures market may cause temporary price distortions. Due to the possibility of distortion, a correct forecast of general interest trends by the Adviser may still not result in a successful transaction.

Another risk is that the Adviser would be incorrect in its expectation as to the extent of various interest rate movements or the time span within which the movements take place. Closing out a futures contract purchase at a loss because of higher interest rates will generally have one or two consequences depending on whether, at the time of closing out, the “yield curve” is normal (long-term rates exceeding short-term). If the yield curve is normal, it is possible that the Fund will still be engaged in a program of buying long-term securities. Thus, closing out the futures contract purchase at a loss will reduce the benefit of the reduced price of the securities purchased. If the yield curve is inverted, it is possible that the Fund will retain

14


its investments in short-term securities earmarked for purchase of longer-term securities. Thus, closing out of a loss will reduce the benefit of the incremental income that the Fund will experience by virtue of the high short-term rates.

Risks of Options. The use of options and options on interest rate futures contracts also involves additional risk. Compared to the purchase or sale of futures contracts, the purchase of call or put options and options on futures contracts involves less potential risk to a Fund because the maximum amount at risk is the premium paid for the options (plus transaction costs).

The effective use of options strategies is dependent, among other things, upon the Fund’s ability to terminate options positions at a time when the Adviser deems it desirable to do so. Although the Fund will enter into an option position only if the Adviser believes that a liquid secondary market exists for such option, there is no assurance that the Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at any particular time or at an acceptable price. The Funds’ transactions involving options on futures contracts will be conducted only on recognized exchanges.

The Funds’ purchase or sale of put or call options and options on futures contracts will be based upon predictions as to anticipated interest rates by the Adviser, which could prove to be inaccurate. Even if the expectations of the Adviser are correct, there may be an imperfect correlation between the change in the value of the options and of the Funds’ portfolio securities.

The Funds may purchase and sell put and call options and options on interest rate futures contracts which are traded on a United States exchange or board of trade as a hedge against changes in interest rates, and will enter into closing transactions with respect to such options to terminate existing positions. An interest rate futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and the purchase by the other party of a certain amount of a specific financial instrument (debt security) at a specified price, date, time and place. An option on an interest rate futures contract, as contrasted with the direct investment in such a contract, gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in an interest rate futures contract at a specified exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option. Options on interest rate futures contracts are similar to options on securities, which give the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to purchase or sell securities.

A call option gives the purchaser of such option the right to buy, and obliges its writer to sell, a specified underlying futures contract at a stated exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option. A purchaser of a put option has the right to sell, and the writer has the obligation to buy, such contract at the exercise price during the option period. Upon exercise of an option, the delivery of the futures position by the writer of the option to the holder of the option will be accompanied by delivery of the accumulated balance in the writer’s futures margin account, which represents the amount by which the market price of the futures contract exceeds, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option on the futures contract. If an option is exercised on the last trading day prior to the expiration date of the option, the settlement will be made entirely in cash equal to the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing price of the interest rate futures contract on the expiration date. The potential loss related to the purchase of an option on interest rate futures contracts is limited to the premium paid for the option (plus transaction costs). Because the value of the option is fixed at the point of sale, there are no daily cash payments to reflect changes in the value of the underlying contract; however, the value of the option does change daily and that change would be reflected in the net asset values of the Fund.

Purchase of Put Options on Futures Contracts. The Funds may purchase put options on futures contracts if the Adviser anticipates a rise in interest rates. Because the value of an interest rate or municipal bond index futures contract moves inversely in relation to changes in interest rates, a put option on such a contract becomes more valuable as interest rates rise. By purchasing put options on futures contracts at a time when the Adviser expects interest rates to rise, the Funds will seek to realize a profit to offset the loss in value of its portfolio securities.

Purchase of Call Options on Futures Contracts. The Funds may purchase call options on futures contracts if the Adviser anticipates a decline in interest rates. The purchase of a call option on an interest rate or index futures contract represents a means of obtaining temporary exposure to market appreciation at limited risk. Because the value of an interest rate or index futures contract moves inversely in relation to changes to interest rates, a call option on such a contract becomes more valuable as interest rates decline. The Funds will purchase a call option on a futures contract to hedge against a decline in interest rates in a market advance when the Funds are holding cash. The Funds can take advantage of the anticipated rise in

15


the value of long-term securities without actually buying them until the market is stabilized. At that time, the options can be liquidated and the Funds’ cash can be used to buy long-term securities.

The Funds expect that new types of futures contracts, options thereon, and put and call options on securities and indexes may be developed in the future. As new types of instruments are developed and offered to investors, the Adviser will be permitted to invest in them provided that the Adviser believes their quality is equivalent to the Funds’ quality standards.

Swap Agreements. Swap agreements are two party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors in which two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differential rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or instruments.

The Funds may enter into swap agreements for purposes of attempting to obtain a particular investment return at a lower cost to the Funds than if the Funds had invested directly in an instrument that provided that desired return. Each Fund bears the risk of default by its swap counterpart and may not be able to terminate its obligations under the agreement when it is most advantageous to do so. In addition, certain tax aspects of swap agreements are not entirely clear and their use, therefore, may be limited by the requirements relating to the qualification of a Fund as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

 

Zero Coupon Securities

Each Fund is permitted to invest in zero coupon securities. Such securities are debt obligations that do not entitle the holder to periodic interest payments prior to maturity and are issued and traded at a discount from their face amounts. The discount varies depending on the time remaining until maturity, prevailing interest rates, liquidity of the security and the perceived credit quality of the issuer. The discount, in the absence of financial difficulties of the issuer, decreases as the final maturity of the security approaches and this accretion (adjusted for amortization) is recognized as interest income. The market prices of zero coupon securities are more volatile than the market prices of securities of comparable quality and similar maturity that pay interest periodically and may respond to a greater degree to fluctuations in interest rates than do such non-zero coupon securities.

 

When-Issued and Forward Commitment Securities

Each Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis and may purchase or sell securities on a “forward commitment” basis. When such transactions are negotiated, the price is fixed at the time the commitment is made, but delivery and payment for the securities take place at a later date, which can be a month or more after the date of the transaction. The Funds will not accrue income in respect of a security purchased on a forward commitment basis prior to its stated delivery date. At the time the Funds make the commitment to purchase securities on a when-issued or forward commitment basis, they will record the transaction and thereafter reflect the value of such securities in determining their net asset value. At the time the Funds enter into a transaction on a when-issued or forward commitment basis, a segregated account consisting of cash and liquid high grade debt obligations equal to the value of the when-issued or forward commitment securities will be established and maintained with the custodian and will be marked to the market daily. On the delivery date, the Funds will meet their obligations from securities that are then maturing or sales of the securities held in the segregated asset account and/or from then available cash flow. If a Fund disposes of the right to acquire a when-issued security prior to its acquisition or disposes of its right to deliver or receive against a forward commitment, it can incur a gain or loss due to market fluctuation.

There is always a risk that the securities may not be delivered and that the Funds may incur a loss or will have lost the opportunity to invest the amount set aside for such transaction in the segregated asset account. Settlements in the ordinary course of business, which may take substantially more than five business days for non-U.S. securities, are not treated by the Funds as when-issued or forward commitment transactions and, accordingly, are not subject to the foregoing limitations even though some of the risks described above may be present in such transactions.

 

Repurchase Agreements

Each Fund, except U.S. Government Securities Fund, is permitted to invest in repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement is a contract by which a Fund acquires the security (“collateral”) subject to the obligation of the seller to repurchase the security at a fixed price and date (within seven days). A repurchase agreement may be construed as a loan pursuant to the 1940 Act. The Funds may enter into repurchase agreements with respect to any securities which they may

16


acquire consistent with their investment policies and restrictions. The Funds’ custodian will hold the securities underlying any repurchase agreement in a segregated account. In investing in repurchase agreements, the Funds’ risk is limited to the ability of the seller to pay the agreed-upon price at the maturity of the repurchase agreement. In the opinion of the Adviser, such risk is not material, since in the event of default, barring extraordinary circumstances, the Funds would be entitled to sell the underlying securities or otherwise receive adequate protection under federal bankruptcy laws for their interest in such securities. However, to the extent that proceeds from any sale upon a default are less than the repurchase price, the Funds could suffer a loss. In addition, the Funds may incur certain delays in obtaining direct ownership of the collateral. The Adviser will continually monitor the value of the underlying securities to ensure that their value always equals or exceeds the repurchase price. The Adviser will submit a list of recommended issuers of repurchase agreements and other short-term securities that it has reviewed for credit worthiness to the Funds’ directors at least quarterly for their approval.

 

Illiquid Securities

The Tax-Free Income Fund and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund may invest up to 15% of its net assets in all forms of “illiquid securities.” As a fundamental policy, the U.S. Government Securities Fund is prohibited from investing any of its assets in any form of restricted or illiquid securities.

An investment is generally deemed to be “illiquid” if it cannot be disposed of within seven days in the ordinary course of business at approximately the amount at which the investment is valued by the Fund. Restricted securities are securities which were originally sold in private placements and which have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”). Such securities generally have been considered illiquid by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), since such securities may be resold only subject to statutory restrictions and delays or if registered under the 1933 Act. However, the SEC has acknowledged that a market exists for certain restricted securities (for example, securities qualifying for resale to certain “qualified institutional buyers” pursuant to Rule 144A under the 1933 Act). Additionally, a similar market exists for commercial paper issued pursuant to the private placement exemption of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. The Funds may invest without limitation in these forms of restricted securities if such securities are determined by the Adviser to be liquid in accordance with standards established by the Funds’ Board of Directors. Under these standards, the Adviser must consider (a) the frequency of trades and quotes for the security, (b) the number of dealers willing to purchase or sell the security and the number of other potential purchasers, (c) dealer undertakings to make a market in the security, and (d) the nature of the security and the nature of the marketplace trades (for example, the time needed to dispose of the security, the method of soliciting offers and the mechanics of transfer).

At the present time, it is not possible to predict with accuracy how the markets for certain restricted securities will develop. Investing in restricted securities could have the effect of increasing the level of a Fund’s illiquidity to the extent that qualified institutional buyers become, for a time, uninterested in purchasing these securities.

 

Variable and Floating Rate Notes

Each Fund may purchase floating and variable rate notes. The interest rate is adjusted either at predesignated periodic intervals (variable rate) or when there is a change in the index rate on which the interest rate on the obligation is based (floating rate). These notes normally have a demand feature which permits the holder to demand payment of principal plus accrued interest upon a specified number of days’ notice. The issuer of floating and variable rate demand notes normally has a corresponding right, after a given period, to prepay at its discretion the outstanding principal amount of the note plus accrued interest upon a specified number of days’ notice to the noteholders.

 

Ratings of Debt Securities

Investment grade debt securities are rated AAA, AA, A or BBB by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”), and Fitch, Ratings (“Fitch”); or Aaa, Aa, A or Baa by Moody’s Investors Services (“Moody’s”). Investment grade municipal notes are rated MIG 1, MIG 2, MIG 3 or MIG 4 (VMIG 1, VMIG 2, VMIG 3 or VMIG 4 for notes with a demand feature) by Moody’s or SP-1 or SP-2 by S&P. Securities rated Baa, MIG 4, VMIG 4 or BBB are medium grade, involve some speculative elements and are the lowest investment grade available. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to make principal and interest payments than is the case with higher grade bonds. These securities generally have less certain protection of principal and interest payments than higher rated securities. Securities rated Ba or BB are judged to have some speculative elements with regard to capacity to

17


pay interest and repay principal. Securities rated B by Moody’s are considered to generally lack characteristics of a desirable investment and the assurance of interest and principal payments over any long period of time may be small. S&P considers securities rated B to have greater vulnerability to default than other speculative grade securities. Adverse economic conditions will likely impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and principal. Debt securities rated below investment grade are commonly known as junk bonds. See Appendix A and B for further information about ratings.

The commercial paper purchased by the Funds will consist only of obligations which, at the time of purchase, are (a) rated at least Prime-1 by Moody’s, A-1 by S&P, or F-1 by Fitch, or (b) if not rated, issued by companies having an outstanding unsecured debt issue which at the time of purchase is rated Aa or higher by Moody’s or AA or higher by S&P.

Subsequent to their purchase, particular securities or other investments may cease to be rated or their ratings may be reduced below the minimum rating required for purchase by the Fund. Neither event will require the elimination of an investment from a Fund’s portfolio, but the Adviser will consider such an event in its determination of whether the Fund should continue to hold the security.

 

Risks of Investing in High Yield Securities

The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund may invest up to 30% of its assets in securities rated below investment-grade. The Tax-Free Income Fund may invest up to 25% of its assets in securities rated below investment-grade. Securities rated below investment-grade are referred to as high yield securities or “junk bonds.” Junk bonds are regarded as being predominantly speculative as to the issuer’s ability to make payments of principal and interest. Investment in such securities involves substantial risk. Issuers of junk bonds may be highly leveraged and may not have available to them more traditional methods of financing. Therefore, the risks associated with acquiring the securities of such issuers generally are greater than is the case with higher rated securities. For example, during an economic downturn or a sustained period of rising interest rates, issuers of junk bonds may be more likely to experience financial stress, especially if such issuers are highly leveraged. In addition, the market for junk bonds is relatively new and has not weathered a major economic recession, and it is unknown what effects such a recession might have on such securities. During such periods, such issuers may not have sufficient cash flows to meet their interest payment obligations. The issuer’s ability to service its debt obligations also may be adversely affected by specific issuer developments, or the issuer’s inability to meet specific projected business forecasts, or the unavailability of additional financing. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for the holders of junk bonds because such securities may be unsecured and may be subordinated to the creditors of the issuer. While most of the junk bonds in which the Funds may invest do not include securities which, at the time of investment, are in default or the issuers of which are in bankruptcy, there can be no assurance that such events will not occur after a Fund purchases a particular security, in which case the Fund may experience losses and incur costs. Junk bonds frequently have call or redemption features that would permit an issuer to repurchase the security from the Fund. If a call were exercised by the issuer during a period of declining interest rates, the Fund likely would have to replace such called security with a lower yielding security, thus decreasing the net investment income to the Fund and dividends to shareholders.

Junk bonds tend to be more volatile than higher-rated fixed income securities, so that adverse economic events may have a greater impact on the prices of junk bonds than on higher-rated fixed income securities. Factors adversely affecting the market value of such securities are likely to affect adversely the Fund’s net asset value. Like higher-rated fixed income securities, junk bonds generally are purchased and sold through dealers who make a market in such securities for their own accounts. However, there are fewer dealers in the junk bond market, which may be less liquid than the market for higher-rated fixed income securities, even under normal economic conditions. Also there may be significant disparities in the prices quoted for junk bonds by various dealers. Adverse economic conditions and investor perceptions thereof (whether or not based on economic fundamentals) may impair the liquidity of this market and may cause the prices the Fund receives for its junk bonds to be reduced. In addition, the Fund may experience difficulty in liquidating a portion of its portfolio when necessary to meet the Fund’s liquidity needs or in response to a specific economic event such as a deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuer. Under such conditions, judgment may play a greater role in valuing certain of the Fund’s portfolio securities than in the case of securities trading in a more liquid market. In addition, the Fund may incur additional expenses to the extent that it is required to seek recovery upon a default on a portfolio holding or to participate in the restructuring of the obligation.

18


 

Diversification

As a fundamental policy, each Fund (except the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund) intends to operate as a “diversified” management investment company, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. A “diversified” investment company means a company which meets the following requirements: At least 75% of the value of the company’s total assets is represented by cash and cash items (including receivables), “Government Securities”, securities of other investment companies, and other securities for the purposes of this calculation limited in respect of any one issuer to an amount not greater in value than 5% of the value of the total assets of such management company and to not more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer. “Government Securities” means securities issued or guaranteed as to principal or interest by the United States, or by a person controlled or supervised by and acting as an instrumentality of the Government of the United States pursuant to authority granted by the Congress of the United States; or certificates of deposit for any of the foregoing. Additionally, each of the Funds has adopted certain restrictions that are more restrictive than the policies set forth in this paragraph.

The Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund is a nondiversified investment company as defined in the 1940 Act which means that the Fund is not restricted by the provisions of the 1940 Act with respect to diversification of its investments. However, the Fund intends to comply with the diversification requirements contained in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Accordingly, at the end of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year (a) at least 50% of the market value of the Fund’s assets must be invested in cash, U.S. Government securities, the securities of other regulated investment companies and other securities, with such other securities of any one issuer limited for the purposes of this calculation to an amount not greater than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and not more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer, and (b) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets can be invested in the securities of any one issuer (other than U.S. Government securities). Since a relatively high percentage of the Fund’s assets may be invested in the obligations of a limited number of issuers, some of which may be within the same economic sector, the Fund’s portfolio securities may be more susceptible to any single economic, political or regulatory occurrence than the portfolio securities of diversified investment companies.

For purposes of such diversification, the identification of the issuer of tax-exempt securities depends on the terms and conditions of the security. If a State or a political subdivision thereof pledges its full faith and credit to payment of a security, the State or the political subdivision, respectively, is deemed the sole issuer of the security. If the assets and revenues of an agency, authority or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision thereof are separate from those of the State or political subdivision and the security is backed only by the assets and revenues of the agency, authority or instrumentality, such agency, authority or instrumentality is deemed to be the sole issuer. Moreover, if the security is backed only by revenues of an enterprise or specific projects of the state, a political subdivision or agency, authority or instrumentality, such as utility revenue bonds, and the full faith and credit of the governmental unit is not pledged to the payment thereof, such enterprise or specific project is deemed the sole issuer. If, however, in any of the above cases, a state, political subdivision or some other entity guarantees a security and the value of all securities issued or guaranteed by the guarantor and owned by the Fund exceeds 10% of the value of the Fund’s total assets, the guarantee is considered a separate security and is treated as an issue of the guarantor.

 

Concentration Policy

As a fundamental policy, neither Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund nor the Tax-Free Income Fund will invest more than 25% of its assets in revenue bonds payable only from revenues derived from facilities or projects within a single industry; however, because other appropriate available investments may be in limited supply, the industry limitation does not apply to housing authority obligations or securities issued by governments or political subdivisions of governments. Appropriate available investments may be in limited supply from time to time in the opinion of the Adviser due to the Funds’ investment policy of investing primarily in “investment grade” securities. The Tax-Free Income Fund does not intend to invest more than 25% of its net assets in securities of governmental units or issuers located in the same state, territory or possession of the U.S.

 

Portfolio Turnover

To attain the investment objectives of the Funds, the Adviser will usually hold securities for the long-term. However, if circumstances warrant, securities may be sold without regard to length of time held. Debt securities may be sold in anticipation of a market decline (a rise in interest rates) or purchased in anticipation of a market rise (a decline in interest rates) and later sold.

19


Increased turnover results in increased brokerage costs and higher transaction costs for the Funds and may affect the taxes shareholders pay. If a security that has been held for less than the holding period set by law is sold, any resulting gains will be taxed in the same manner as ordinary income as opposed to long-term capital gain. Each Fund’s turnover rate may vary from year to year. For additional information, refer to “Taxes” and “Brokerage” below. The portfolio turnover rates for each of the Funds are contained in the Financial Highlights tables in the prospectus.

 

Securities Lending

Each of the Funds may lend portfolio securities to brokers, dealers and other financial institutions needing to borrow securities to complete certain transactions. Such loans may not exceed 33-1/3% of the value of a Fund’s total assets. To date, the Funds have not loaned securities, and neither the Funds nor the Adviser intend to lend securities in the immediate future.

The lending of portfolio securities may increase the average annual return to shareholders. Lending of portfolio securities also involves certain risks to the Funds. As with other extensions of credit, there are risks of delay in recovery of loaned securities, or even loss of rights in collateral pledged by the borrower, should the borrower fail financially. However, the Funds will only enter into loan agreements with broker-dealers, banks, and other institutions that the Adviser has determined are creditworthy. A Fund may also experience a loss if, upon the failure of a borrower to return loaned securities, the collateral is not sufficient in value or liquidity to cover the value of such loaned securities (including accrued interest thereon). However, the borrower will be required to pledge collateral that the custodian for the Fund’s portfolio securities will take into possession before any securities are loaned. Additionally, the borrower may pledge only cash, securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies and instrumentalities, certificates of deposit or other high-grade, short-term obligations or interest-bearing cash equivalents as collateral. There will be a daily procedure to ensure that the pledged collateral is equal in value to at least 100% of the value of the securities loaned. Under such procedure, the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower as of any particular business day will be determined on the next succeeding business day. If such value is less than 100% of the value of the securities loaned, the borrower will be required to pledge additional collateral. The risks of borrower default (and the resultant risk of loss to a Fund) also are reduced by lending only securities for which a ready market exists. This will reduce the risk that the borrower will not be able to return such securities due to its inability to cover its obligation by purchasing such securities on the open market.

To the extent that collateral is comprised of cash, a Fund will be able to invest such collateral only in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies and instrumentalities and in certificates of deposit or other high-grade, short-term obligations or interest-bearing cash equivalents. If a Fund invests cash collateral in such securities, the Fund could experience a loss if the value of such securities declines below the value of the cash collateral pledged to secure the loaned securities. The amount of such loss would be the difference between the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower and the value of the securities in which the pledged collateral was invested.

 

Duration

Duration is a measure of the expected life of a fixed income security on a present value basis. Duration incorporates a bond’s yield, coupon interest payments, final principal at maturity and call features into one measure. It measures the expected price sensitivity of a fixed income security (or portfolio) for a given change in interest rates. For example, if interest rates rise by one percent, the market value of a security (or portfolio) having a duration of two years generally will fall by approximately two percent. The Adviser uses several methods to compute various duration estimates appropriate for particular securities held in portfolios.

Duration incorporates payments prior to maturity and therefore it is considered a more precise measure of interest rate risk than “term to maturity.” “Term to maturity” measures only the time until a debt security provides its final payment, and does not account for pre-maturity payments. Most debt securities provide coupon interest payments in addition to a final (“par”) payment at maturity, and some securities have call provisions which allow the issuer to repay the instrument in part or in full before the maturity date. Each of these may affect the security’s price sensitivity to interest rate changes.

For bonds that are not subject to calls prior to their maturity, duration is an effective measure of price sensitivity to changing interest rates. However, it does not properly reflect certain types of interest rate risk as bonds may be subject to optional or special mandatory redemption provisions that affect the timing of principal repayment and thus, the duration of the debt security. These provisions include refunding calls, sinking fund calls and prepayment calls. For example,

20


while the stated final maturity of mortgage “pass-through” securities is generally 30 years, expected prepayment rates are more important in determining duration. Municipal bonds may also be subject to special redemption from unexpended proceeds, excess revenues, sale proceeds or other sources of funds, and municipal bonds may be advance refunded. Floating and variable rate debt securities may have final maturities of ten or more years, yet their interest rate risk corresponds to the frequency and benchmark index of the coupon reset. In such situations, the Adviser uses more sophisticated analytical techniques that incorporate these additional variables to arrive at a modified, effective, implied or average life duration to reflect interest rate risk. These techniques may involve the portfolio manager’s expectations of future economic conditions, and these assumptions may vary from actual future conditions. The various methods used to compute appropriate duration estimates for certain bond issues, particularly those that are traded infrequently and that have a low amount of outstanding debt such as municipal bonds, may require greater reliance on the use of such assumptions by the Adviser. Therefore, for those issues, the effective or implied duration may be a less accurate estimate of interest rate risk than it is for other types of bond issues.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT SELLING SHARES


 

Suspension of Selling Ability

Each Fund may suspend selling privileges or postpone the date of payment:

 

 

-

During any period that the NYSE is closed other than customary weekend or holiday closings, or when trading is restricted, as determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”);

-

During any period when an emergency exists, as determined by the SEC, as a result of which it is not reasonably practical for the Fund to dispose of securities owned by it or to fairly determine the value of its assets;

-

For such other periods as the SEC may permit.


 

Telephone Transactions

Once you place a telephone transaction request to Sit Mutual Funds, it cannot be canceled or modified. The Funds use reasonable procedures to confirm that telephone instructions are genuine, including requiring that payments be made only to the shareholder’s address of record or the bank account designated on the application and requiring certain means of telephone identification. If the Fund fails to employ such procedures, it may be liable for any losses suffered by Fund shareholders as a result of unauthorized or fraudulent instructions. During times of chaotic economic or market circumstances, a shareholder may have difficulty reaching the Funds by telephone. Consequently, a redemption or exchange by telephone may be difficult to implement at those times.

 

Redemption-In-Kind

If the Adviser determines that existing conditions make cash payments undesirable, redemption payments may be made in whole or in part in securities or other financial assets, valued for this purpose as they are valued in computing the NAV for a Fund’s shares. Shareholders receiving securities or other financial assets on redemption may realize a gain or loss for tax purposes and will incur any costs of sale, as well as the associated inconveniences.

 

COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE

Net asset value is determined as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange on each day that the exchange is open for business. The customary national business holidays observed by the New York Stock Exchange and on which the Funds are closed are: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, President’s Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, July Fourth, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The net asset value per share will not be determined on these national holidays. The net asset value is calculated by dividing the total value of a Fund’s investments and other assets (including accrued income), less any liabilities, by the number of shares outstanding. The net asset value per share of each Fund will fluctuate.

Debt securities may be valued on the basis of prices furnished by one or more pricing services when the Adviser believes such prices accurately reflect the fair market value of such securities. Such pricing services utilize electronic data processing techniques to determine prices for normal institutional-size trading units of debt securities without regard to sale or bid prices. When prices are not readily available from a pricing service, or if the Adviser believes they are unreliable, securities may be valued at fair value using methods selected in good faith by the Boards of Directors. The types of securities for which such fair value pricing might be required include, but are not limited to: securities, including securities traded in foreign markets, where an event occurs after the close of the market in which such security principally

21


trades, but before NAV is determined, that will materially affect net asset value, or the closing value is otherwise deemed unreliable; securities whose trading has been halted or suspended; debt securities that have gone into default and for which there is no current market value quotation; and securities with limited liquidity, including certain high-yield securities or securities that are restricted as to transfer or resale. Short-term investments in debt securities with maturities of less than 60 days when acquired, or which subsequently are within 60 days of maturity, are valued by using the amortized cost method of valuation.

Securities which are traded on an exchange or on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market are valued at the last quoted sale price of the day. Lacking a last sale price, a security is generally valued at its last bid price. All other securities for which over-the-counter market quotations are readily available are valued at their last bid price. When market quotations are not readily available, or when restricted securities are being valued, such securities are valued at fair value using methods selected in good faith by the Boards of Directors.

On March 31, 2008, the net asset value and public offering price per share for each Fund was calculated as follows:

           (net assets / shares outstanding) = net asset value (NAV) per share = public offering price per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fund

 

 

net assets

 

shares outstanding

 

NAV and public offering price

 

U.S. Government Securities Fund

 

254,677,056

 

23,315,544

 

10.92

 

Tax-Free Income Fund

 

322,590,287

 

35,205,736

 

9.16

 

Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund

 

307,737,778

 

31,516,338

 

9.76

 


 

MANAGEMENT

The Sit Mutual Funds are a family of 12 no-load mutual funds. Three Bond Funds are described in this Statement of Additional Information: The Sit U.S. Government Securities Fund, Sit Tax-Free Income Fund, and the Sit Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund (the “Funds” or individually, a “Fund”). One bond fund, the Sit High Income Municipal Bond Fund, is described in a separate Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. The eight stock funds within the Sit Mutual Fund family are described in a separate Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

The U.S. Government Securities Fund, the corporate issuer of the Tax-Free Income Fund, and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund; have corporate officers and Boards of Directors, The Boards of Directors are responsible for the management of the Funds and the establishment of the Funds’ policies. The officers of the Funds manage the day-to-day operation of the Funds.

The Boards of Directors have established an Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is composed entirely of directors who are not interested persons of the Fund (except in their capacities as directors) as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. A member of an Audit Committee may not accept any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the Fund other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors, or any other Board committee. The function of the Audit Committees is oversight. The primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is to oversee the Fund’s accounting and financial reporting policies and practices; its internal controls over financial reporting, and the internal controls of the Fund’s accounting, transfer agency and custody service providers; to oversee the Fund’s financial reporting and the independent audit of the Fund’s financial statements; and to oversee, or, as appropriate, assist the full Boards’ oversight of, the Fund’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that relate to the Fund’s accounting and financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and independent audits; to act as a liaison between the Fund’s independent auditors and the full Boards of Directors. There were two meetings of the Audit Committee during the Funds’ last fiscal year. The members of the Audit Committee include: Melvin C. Bahle, John P. Fagan, Sidney L. Jones, Bruce C. Lueck and Donald W. Phillips.

Information pertaining to the directors and officers of the Funds is set forth on the following page. Except as noted, the business address of each officer and director is the same as that of the Adviser - 3300 IDS Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

22


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name,
Address and
Age

 

Position
Held with
the Funds

 

Term of
Office(1)
and Length of
Time Served

 

Principal
Occupations During
Past Five Years

 

# of Funds
in Fund
Complex
Overseen

by Director

 

Other
Directorships Held by
Director(3)

Interested Director:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William E. Frenzel (2)
Age: 80

 

Director

 

Director since 1991 or the Fund’s inception if later.

 

Guest Scholar at The Brookings Institution and member of several government policy committees, foundations and organizations; Director of Sit Investment Associates, Inc. (the “Adviser”); Director of Sit/Kim International Investment Associates, II, LLC (“Sit/Kim”); Director of Sit Investment Fixed Income Advisors, Inc. (“SF”).

 

12

 

None.

Independent Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Melvin C. Bahle
Age: 89

 

Director

 

Director since 2005; Director Emeritus from 1995 to 2005, and Director from 1984 to 1995, or the Fund’s inception if later.

 

Director and/or officer of several foundations and charitable organizations.

 

12

 

None.

John P. Fagan
Age: 78

 

Director

 

Director since 2006.

 

Honorary member on Board of St. Joseph’s College in Rensselaer, Indiana

 

12

 

None.

Sidney L. Jones
Age: 74

 

Director

 

Director from 1988 to 1989 and from 1993 or the Fund’s inception if later.

 

Lecturer, Washington Campus Consortium of 17 Universities; Senior Advisor to Lawrence and Company (investment management), Toronto, Canada.

 

12

 

None.

Bruce C. Lueck
Age: 67

 

Director

 

Director since 2004 or the Fund’s inception, if later.

 

Consultant for Zephyr Management, L.P. (investment management) and committee member of several investment funds and foundations. President & Chief Investment Officer, Okabena Investment Services, Inc. from 1985 to 2003; Board Member, Okabena Company from 1985 to 2003.

 

12

 

None.

Donald W. Phillips
Age: 60

 

Director

 

Director of the International Fund since 1993, and since 1990 or the Fund’s inception if later for all other Funds.

 

Chairman and CEO of WP Global Partners Inc., 7/05 to present; CEO and CIO of WestLB Asset Management (USA) LLC, 4/00 to 4/05.

 

12

 

None.

Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Roger J. Sit (2)
Age: 46

 

Chairman and President

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 1998.

 

President, CEO and Global CIO of the Adviser; Director, President, CEO and Global CIO of Sit/Kim; Chairman and CEO of SF; Chairman of SIA Securities Corp. (the “Distributor”).

 

N/A

 

N/A

Michael C. Brilley
Age: 63

 

Senior Vice President

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 1985.

 

Senior Vice President and Senior Fixed Income Officer of the Adviser; Director and President and Chief Fixed Income Officer of SF.

 

N/A

 

N/A

23


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name,
Address and
Age

 

Position
Held with
the Funds

 

Term of
Office(1)
and Length of
Time Served

 

Principal
Occupations During
Past Five Years

 

# of Funds
in Fund
Complex Overseen
by Director

 

Other
Directorships Held by
Director(3)

Officers (continued):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debra A. Sit
Age: 47

 

Vice President - Investments

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 1994.

 

Vice President – Bond Investments of the Adviser; Senior Vice President, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of SF; Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Sit/Kim.

 

N/A

 

N/A

Mark H. Book
Age: 45

 

Vice President - Investments of U.S. Govt Fund only.

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 2002.

 

Vice President and Portfolio Manager of SF.

 

N/A

 

N/A

Bryce A. Doty
Age: 41

 

Vice President - Investments of U.S. Govt. Fund only.

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 1996.

 

Vice President and Portfolio Manager of SF.

 

N/A

 

N/A

Paul J. Junquist
Age: 46

 

Vice President – Investments of Tax-Free, MN Tax- Free & High Income Muni Funds only.

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 1996.

 

Vice President and Portfolio Manager of SF.

 

N/A

 

N/A

Paul E. Rasmussen
Age: 47

 

Vice President, Treasurer & Chief Compliance Officer

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 1994.

 

Vice President, Secretary, Controller and Chief Compliance Officer of the Adviser; Vice President, Secretary, and Chief Compliance Officer of Sit/Kim and SF; President of the Distributor.

 

N/A

 

N/A

Michael J. Radmer
Suite 1500
50 South Sixth St.
Minneapolis, MN
55402
Age: 63

 

Secretary

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 1984.

 

Partner of the Funds’ general counsel, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP

 

N/A

 

N/A

Carla J. Rose
Age: 42

 

Vice President, Assistant Secretary & Assistant Treasurer

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 2000.

 

Vice President, Administration & Deputy Controller of the Adviser; Vice President, Administration and Controller of Sit/Kim; Controller and Treasurer of SF; Vice President and Assistant Secretary of the Distributor.

 

N/A

 

N/A

Kelly K. Boston
Age: 39

 

Assistant Secretary & Assistant Treasurer

 

Re-Elected by the Boards annually; Officer since 2000.

 

Staff Attorney of the Adviser; Secretary of the Distributor.

 

N/A

 

N/A


 

 

1)

Each Director serves until their resignation, removal or the next meeting of the shareholders at which election of directors is an agenda item and until his successor is duly elected and shall qualify.

2)

Director who is deemed to be an “interested person” of the Funds as that term is defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940. Mr. Frenzel is deemed to be an interested person because he is an advisory director and shareholder of the Fund’s investment adviser.

3)

Includes only directorships of companies required to report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i.e. public companies) or other investment companies registered under the 1940 Act.

24


 

Portfolio Managers

The Funds’ investment decisions are made by a team of portfolio mangers and analysts who are jointly responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds. The portfolio management team is led by Michael C. Brilley, Senior Vice President of the Adviser; Debra A. Sit, Vice President of the Adviser; and Bryce A. Doty, Vice President – Investments of the U.S. Government Securities Fund.

Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Management Team, as of March 31, 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type of account

 

Total
number of
accounts

 

Total assets

 

Number of
accounts included
in total with
performance based
advisory fee

 

Assets of accounts
included in total
with performance
based advisory fee

 

Michael C. Brilley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registered investment companies

 

 

6

 

 

1,305,079,281

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

Other pooled investment vehicles

 

 

13

 

 

182,751,468

 

 

6

 

 

144,453,909

 

Other accounts

 

 

164

 

 

3,714,630,622

 

 

14

 

 

255,192,639

 

Total

 

 

183

 

 

5,202,461,370

 

 

20

 

 

399,646,548

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debra A. Sit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registered investment companies

 

 

2

 

 

623,307,129

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

Other pooled investment vehicles

 

 

1

 

 

5,961,233

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

Other accounts

 

 

33

 

 

272,663,064

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

Total

 

 

36

 

 

901,931,426

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark H. Book

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registered investment companies

 

 

3

 

 

330,621,497

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

Other pooled investment vehicles

 

 

8

 

 

158,032,625

 

 

5

 

 

134,933,707

 

Other accounts

 

 

81

 

 

1,986,710,274

 

 

13

 

 

253,652,534

 

Total

 

 

92

 

 

2,475,364,396

 

 

18

 

 

388,586,241

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bryce A. Doty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registered investment companies

 

 

2

 

 

258,824,520

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

Other pooled investment vehicles

 

 

8

 

 

158,032,625

 

 

5

 

 

134,933,707

 

Other accounts

 

 

84

 

 

2,046,201,309

 

 

13

 

 

253,652,534

 

Total

 

 

94

 

 

2,463,058,454

 

 

18

 

 

388,586,241

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paul J. Jungquist

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registered investment companies

 

 

4

 

 

979,278,244

 

 

None

 

 

0

 

Other pooled investment vehicles

 

 

5

 

 

32,778,831

 

 

2

 

 

20,019,065

 

Other accounts

 

 

38

 

 

1,003,241,823

 

 

1

 

 

1,540,105

 

Total

 

 

47

 

 

2,015,298,898

 

 

3

 

 

21,559,170

 

The Adviser and its affiliates provide investment management and other services to clients who may or may not have investment policies, objectives and investments similar to those of the Fund. Sit may give advice and take actions on behalf of such clients which differ from advice given or actions taken in respect to the Fund. The Adviser and its affiliates do not manage accounts that have investment strategies that materially conflict with the investment strategy of the Funds.

Compensation of Investment Professionals. The Funds do not pay any salary, bonus, deferred compensation, pension or retirement plan on behalf of the portfolio managers or any other employees of the Adviser. The portfolio managers of the Funds receive compensation from the Adviser. The compensation of the portfolio managers and analysts is comprised of a fixed base salary, an annual bonus, and periodic deferred compensation bonuses which may include phantom stock plans. Portfolio managers and analysts also participate in the profit sharing 401(k) plan of the Adviser. Competitive pay in the marketplace is considered in determining total compensation. The bonus awards are based on the attainment of personal and company goals which are comprised of a number of factors, including: the annual composite investment performance of the Adviser’s accounts (which may include one or more of the Funds) relative to the investment accounts’

25


benchmark index (including the primary benchmark of a Fund included in the composite, if any); the Adviser’s growth in assets under management from new assets (which may include assets of a Fund); profitability of the Adviser; and the quality of investment research efforts. Contributions made to the Adviser’s profit sharing 401(k) plan are subject to the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code and Regulations.

Fund Shares Owned by Portfolio Management Team. The table below indicates the dollar range of Fund ownership in each of the Funds by each member of the portfolio management team, as of March 31, 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name of
Portfolio Manager

 

U.S.
Government
Securities
Fund

 

Tax-Free
Income
Fund

 

MN
Tax-Free
Income
Fund

Michael C. Brilley

 

$50,001-
$100,000

 

None

 

$10,001 -
$50,000

Debra A. Sit

 

$10,001 -
$50,000

 

$100,001-
$500,000

 

$50,001 -
$100,000

Mark H. Book

 

$10,001 -
$50,000

 

None

 

None

Bryce A. Doty

 

$10,001 -
$50,000

 

None

 

None

Paul J. Jungquist

 

$10,001 -
$50,000

 

None

 

$50,001 -
$100,000


 

Fund Shares Owned by Directors

The table below indicates the dollar range of each Board member’s ownership of Fund shares and shares of other funds in the Sit Family of Funds for which he is a Board member, in each case as of December 31, 2007.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name of Director

 

U.S.
Government
Securities
Fund

 

Tax-
Free
Income
Fund

 

MN Tax-
Free
Income
Fund

 

Aggregate Dollar
Range of Equity
Securities in the
12 Sit Mutual
Funds (2)

Melvin C. Bahle

 

$10,000–
$50,000

 

Over
$100,000

 

None

 

Over
$100,000

John P. Fagan

 

None

 

None

 

None

 

Over
$100,000

William E. Frenzel (1)

 

None

 

Over
$100,000

 

None

 

Over
$100,000

Sidney L. Jones

 

Over
$100,000

 

None

 

None

 

Over
$100,000

Bruce C. Lueck

 

None

 

None

 

None

 

Over
$100,000

Donald W. Phillips

 

None

 

None

 

None

 

$10,000–
$50,000


 

 

1)

Director who is deemed to be an “interested person” of the Funds as that term is defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 

 

2)

As of December 31, 2007, Sit Mutual Funds consisted of 12 no-load mutual funds; three Bond Funds which are described in this Statement of Additional Information, Sit Money Market Fund which was liquidated and dissolved on March 31, 2009, Sit High Income Municipal Bond Fund, which is described in a separate Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, and seven stock funds which are described in a separate Stock Funds Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

26


The table below indicates the amount of securities owned beneficially, or of record, by each independent Director, and their immediate family members, in (i) an investment advisor or principal underwriter of the Fund and (ii) a person (other than a registered investment company) directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with an investment advisor or principal underwriter of the Funds. Information provided is as of December 31, 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name of Director

 

Name of Owners and
Relationships to Director

 

Company

 

Title of
Class

 

Value of
Securities

 

Percent of
Class

 

Melvin C. Bahle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sidney L. Jones

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John P. Fagan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bruce C. Lueck

 

Bruce C. Lueck

 

Sit Capital Fund, L.P. (1)

 

 

L.P. (2)

 

$

262,729

 

 

0.7

%

Donald W. Phillips

 

National Financial Services FBO Donald W. Phillips (IRA)

 

Sit Pacific Basin Fund, LLC (3)

 

 

LLC (4)

 

$

264,612

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

National Financial Services FBO Donald W. Phillips (Profit Sharing Plan)

 

Sit Pacific Basin Fund, LLC (3)

 

 

LLC (4)

 

$

43,067

 

 

0.4

%


 

 

1)

Sit Investment Associates, Inc. is the general partner and a limited partner.

 

 

2)

Membership interest in Limited Partnership

 

 

3)

Sit/Kim International Investment Associates II, LLC, an affiliate of Sit Investment Associates, Inc., holds Class A and Class B Membership Interests in the Fund.

 

 

4)

Membership interest in Limited Liability Company


 

Compensation of Directors

The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation received by each Director from each Fund and from all twelve of the Sit Mutual Funds for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (including Sit Money Market Fund which was liquidated and dissolved on March 31, 2008). The Sit Funds as a group paid each Director, who is not also an officer, an annual fee of $30,000, $2,500 for each meeting attended, and provided reimbursement for travel and other expenses. Each Director that is a member of the Sit Funds’ Audit Committee was paid $1,000 for each Audit Committee meeting attended. The Audit Committee Chairman is paid a $2,500 chairman fee, and the Lead Independent Director is paid a $2,500 lead director fee. Audit Committee meetings are held at least twice a year. Mr. Jones serves as the Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Audit Committee and Mr. Bahle, Mr. Fagan, Mr. Lueck and Mr. Phillips are Audit Committee members. Pursuant to each Fund’s investment management agreement with the Adviser, the Adviser is obligated to pay the Funds’ expenses, including fees paid to the Directors. (See discussion under “Investment Adviser” below.) Directors who are officers of the Adviser or any of its affiliates did not receive any such compensation and are not included in the table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name of Director

 

Aggregate
Compensation
For Each
Fund

 

Pension or
Retirement
Benefits Accrued
as Part of Fund
Expenses

 

Estimated
Annual
Benefits
Upon
Retirement

 

Total
Compensation
From
Fund Complex

 

Melvin C. Bahle

 

$

3,500

 

None

 

None

 

$

42,000

 

John P. Fagan

 

$

3,500

 

None

 

None

 

$

42,000

 

Sidney L. Jones

 

$

3,917

 

None

 

None

 

$

47,000

 

Bruce C. Lueck

 

$

3,500

 

None

 

None

 

$

42,000

 

Donald W. Phillips

 

$

3,500

 

None

 

None

 

$

42,000

 

William E. Frenzel

 

$

3,333

 

None

 

None

 

$

40,000

 


 

Code of Ethics

The Funds and their investment adviser and principal underwriter have adopted a code of ethics under rule 17j-1 of the Investment Company Act which permits personnel subject to the code to invest in securities, including securities that may be purchased or held by the Funds.

27


 

INVESTMENT ADVISER

Sit Investment Associates, Inc. (the “Adviser”) was incorporated in Minnesota on July 14, 1981 and has served as the Funds’ investment adviser since the inception of each Fund pursuant to Investment Management Agreements.

 

Terms Common to All Funds’ Investment Management Agreements

Each Fund’s Investment Management Agreement provides that the Adviser will manage the investment of the Fund’s assets, subject to the applicable provisions of the Fund’s articles of incorporation, bylaws and current registration statement (including, but not limited to, the investment objective, policies and restrictions delineated in the Fund’s current prospectus and Statement of Additional Information), as interpreted from time to time by the Fund’s Board of Directors. Under each Agreement, the Adviser has the sole and exclusive responsibility for the management of the Fund’s investment portfolio and for making and executing all investment decisions for the Fund. The Adviser is obligated under each Agreement to report to the Fund’s Board of Directors regularly at such times and in such detail as the Board may from time to time determine appropriate, in order to permit the Board to determine the adherence of the Adviser to the Fund’s investment policies. Each Agreement also provides that the Adviser shall not be liable for any loss suffered by the Fund in connection with the matters to which the Agreement relates, except losses resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the Adviser in the performance of its obligations and duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the Agreement.

Each Agreement provides that the Adviser shall, at its own expense, furnish all office facilities, equipment and personnel necessary to discharge its responsibilities and duties under the Agreement and that the Adviser will arrange, if requested by the Fund, for officers or employees of the Adviser to serve without compensation from the Fund as directors, officers or employees of the Fund if duly elected to such positions by the shareholders or directors of the Fund.

Each Agreement provides that it will continue in effect from year to year only as long as such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the applicable Fund’s Board of Directors or shareholders and by a majority of the Board of Directors who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Adviser or the Fund. The Agreement is terminable upon 60 days’ written notice by the Adviser or the Fund and will terminate automatically in the event of its “assignment” (as defined in the 1940 Act).

 

Compensation and Allocation of Expenses

Under the Investment Management Agreements of Tax-Free Income Fund and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund, each Fund is obligated to pay the Adviser a flat monthly fee, which is equal on an annual basis to .80% of the average daily net assets of the Fund. Under the Investment Management Agreement for U.S. Government Securities Fund, the Fund is obligated to pay the Adviser a flat monthly fee equal on an annual basis to 1.00% of the first $50 million of average daily net assets and .80% of average daily net assets in excess of $50 million. However, under each such Fund’s Agreement, the Adviser has agreed to bear all of the Fund’s expenses, except for extraordinary expenses (as designated by a majority of the Fund’s disinterested directors), interest, brokerage commissions and other transaction charges relating to the investing activities of the Fund.

For the period October 1, 1993 through December 31, 2009 the Adviser has voluntarily agreed to limit the management fee (and, thereby, all Fund expenses, except those not payable by the Adviser as set forth above) of U.S. Government Securities Fund to .80% of average daily net assets per yearand of Tax-Free Income Fund to .70% of the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $250 million and .60% of the Funds’ daily net assets in excess of $500 million. After December 31, 2009, this voluntary fee waiver may be discontinued by the Adviser in its sole discretion.

Set forth below are the investment management fees paid by each Fund, during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, and other fees and expenses paid by the Funds during such years and fees and expenses of the Funds waived or paid by the Adviser during such years:

28


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Govt.
Securities
Fund

 

Tax-Free
Income
Fund

 

MN Tax-Free
Income
Fund

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Advisory Fees

 

$

1,789,364

 

$

2,988,244

 

$

2,435,192

 

Fees Waived

 

 

(99,726

)

 

(122,234

)

 

 

Net Fund Expense

 

 

1,689,638

 

 

2,866,010

 

 

2,435,192

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Advisory Fees

 

 

1,799,020

 

 

2,935,165

 

 

2,192,609

 

Fees Waived

 

 

(99,726

)

 

(117,581

)

 

 

Net Fund Expense

 

 

1,699,294

 

 

2,817,584

 

 

2,192,609

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Advisory Fees

 

 

2,156,246

 

 

2,841,985

 

 

1,981,777

 

Fees Waived

 

 

(100,000

)

 

(105,248

)

 

 

Net Fund Expense

 

 

2,056,246

 

 

2,736,737

 

 

1,981,777

 


 

Re-Approval of Investment Management Agreements

At their joint meeting held on October 22, 2007 the Boards of Directors of the Sit Mutual Funds unanimously approved the continuation for another one year period the investment management agreements entered into by and between Sit Investment Associates, Inc. and Sit Mutual Funds II, Inc. dated November 1, 1992; and Sit U.S. Government Securities Fund, Inc. dated November 1, 1992.

 

DISTRIBUTOR

Sit Mutual Funds II, Inc., on behalf of the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund, and the Tax-Free Income Fund, and the U.S. Government Securities Fund, have entered into an Underwriting and Distribution Agreement with SIA Securities Corp. (“Securities”), an affiliate of the Adviser, pursuant to which Securities acts as each Fund’s principal underwriter. Securities markets each Fund’s shares only to certain institutional investors and all other sales of each Fund’s shares are made by each Fund. The Adviser pays all expenses of Securities in connection with such services and Securities is otherwise not entitled to any other compensation under the Underwriting and Distribution Agreement. Each Fund will incur no additional fees in connection with the Underwriting and Distribution Agreement.

Pursuant to the Underwriting and Distribution Agreement, Securities has agreed to act as the principal underwriter for each Fund in the sale and distribution to the public of shares of each Fund, either through dealers or otherwise. Securities has agreed to offer such shares for sale at all times when such shares are available for sale and may lawfully be offered for sale and sold. The Underwriting and Distribution Agreement is renewable from year to year if the Fund’s directors approve such agreement. The Fund or Securities can terminate the Underwriting and Distribution Agreement at any time without penalty on 60 days’ notice written notice to the other party. The Underwriting and Distribution Agreement terminates automatically upon its assignment. In the Underwriting and Distribution Agreement, Securities agrees to indemnify each Fund against all costs of litigation and other legal proceedings and against any liability incurred by or imposed on the Fund in any way arising out of or in connection with the sale or distribution of each Fund’s shares, except to the extent that such liability is the result of information which was obtainable by Securities only from persons affiliated with the Fund but not Securities.

Securities or the Adviser may enter into agreements with various brokerage or other firms pursuant to which such firms provide certain administrative services with respect to customers who are beneficial owners of shares of the Fund. The Adviser or Securities may compensate such firms for the services provided, which compensation is based on the aggregate assets of customers that are invested in the Funds.

 

BROKERAGE

Transactions on a stock exchange in equity securities will be executed primarily through brokers that will receive a commission paid by the applicable Fund. Fixed income securities, as well as equity securities traded in the over-the-counter market, are generally traded on a “net” basis with dealers acting as principals for their own accounts without a stated commission, although the price of the security usually includes a profit to the dealer. In underwritten fixed income and equity offerings, securities are purchased at a fixed price that includes an amount of compensation to the underwriter,

29


generally referred to as the underwriter’s selling concession or discount. Certain of these securities may also be purchased directly from the issuer, in which case neither commissions nor discounts are paid.

The Adviser selects and, where applicable, negotiates commissions with the broker-dealers who execute the transactions for one or more of the Funds. The primary criterion for the selection of a broker-dealer is the ability of the broker-dealer, in the opinion of the Adviser, to secure prompt execution of the transactions on favorable terms, including the best price of the security, the reasonableness of the commission and considering the state of the market at the time. When consistent with these objectives, business may be placed with broker-dealers who furnish investment research or services to the Adviser. Such research or services include advice, both directly and in writing, as to the value of securities, the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities, and the availability of securities, or purchasers or sellers of securities. Such services also may include analyses and reports concerning issues, industries, securities, economic factors and trends, portfolio strategy, and the performance of accounts. This allows the Adviser to supplement its own investment research activities and enables the Adviser to obtain the views and information of individuals and research staffs of many different securities firms prior to making investment decisions for the Funds. To the extent portfolio transactions are effected with broker-dealers who furnish research services to the Adviser, the Adviser receives a benefit, not capable of valuation in dollar amounts, without providing any direct monetary benefit to the applicable Funds from these transactions. The Adviser believes that most research services they receive generally benefit several or all of the investment companies and private accounts which they manage, as opposed to solely benefiting one specific managed fund or account. Normally, research services obtained through managed funds or accounts investing in common stocks would primarily benefit the managed funds or accounts which invest in common stock; similarly, services obtained from transactions in fixed income securities would normally be of greater benefit to the managed funds or accounts which invest in debt securities.

The Adviser maintains an informal list of broker-dealers, which is used from time to time as a general guide in the placement of Fund business, in order to encourage certain broker-dealers to provide the Adviser with research services which the Adviser anticipates will be useful to it in managing the Funds. Because the list is merely a general guide, which is to be used only after the primary criterion for the selection of broker-dealers (discussed above) has been met, substantial deviations from the list are permissible and may be expected to occur. The Adviser will authorize a Fund to pay an amount of commission for effecting a securities transaction in excess of the amount of commission another broker-dealer would have charged only if the Adviser determines in good faith that such amount of commission is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such broker-dealer, viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or the Adviser’s overall responsibilities with respect to the accounts as to which it exercises investment discretion. Generally, a Fund pays commissions higher than the lowest commission rates available.

Fund management does not currently anticipate that a Fund will affect brokerage transactions in its portfolio securities with any broker-dealer affiliated directly or indirectly with the Funds or the Adviser.

The Adviser has entered into agreements with Capital Institutional Services, Inc. (“CIS”), and Autranet, Inc. (“AI”), unaffiliated registered broker-dealers. All transactions placed with CIS and AI are subject to the above criteria. CIS and AI provide the Adviser with a wide variety of economic, performance, analytical and investment research information, resources from Egan-Jones Rating Company, Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service Inc., Municipal Market Data, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, Bloomberg, L.P., Institutional Investor, Pattern Recognition Research Inc., and Stone & McCarthy Research Associates.

Investment decisions for each Fund are made independently of those for other clients of the Adviser, including the other Funds. When the Funds or clients simultaneously engage in the purchase or sale of the same securities, the price of the transactions is averaged and the amount allocated in accordance with a formula deemed equitable to each Fund and client. In some cases, this system may adversely affect the price paid or received by the Fund or the size of the position obtainable. All trades will be transacted through U.S. based brokerage firms and commercial banks.

Brokerage commissions paid by the Funds for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

U.S. Government Securities Fund

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

Tax-Free Income Fund

 

$

31,731

 

$

9,166

 

$

18,155

 

Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund

 

$

9,865

 

$

1,248

 

 

0

 

30


The amount of commissions paid by the Tax-Free Income Fund and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund fluctuate from year to year due to the amount of the Fund’s transactions in securities issued by certain closed-end funds during the period.

 

PROXY VOTING

 

The Funds, or the corporate issuer of their shares, on behalf of the Funds, has delegated the voting of portfolio securities to the Adviser. The Adviser has adopted proxy voting policies and procedures (the “Proxy Voting Policy”) for the voting of proxies on behalf of client accounts for which the Adviser has voting discretion, including the Fund. Under the Proxy Voting Policy, shares are to be voted in the best interests of the Fund.

A Proxy Committee comprised of senior management is responsible for the development and implementation of the Proxy Voting Policy, and oversees and manages the day-to-day operations of the Adviser’s Proxy Voting Policies.

Generally, the Adviser exercises proxy voting discretion on proxy proposals in accordance with guidelines (the “Proxy Guidelines”) set forth in the Proxy Voting Policy. The Proxy Guidelines address issues which are frequently included in proxy proposals. Such issues include, for example, proposals seeking shareholder approval of equity-based compensation plans, changes in corporate control or shareholder rights, poison pills, corporate restructuring, and significant transactions. Proxy proposals which contain novel issues, include unique circumstances, or otherwise are not addressed in the Proxy Guidelines are reviewed by the Proxy Committee or it’s designates(s). The Proxy Committee or its designee(s) review each non-routine issue and determine the Adviser’s vote. The Proxy Committee considers the facts and circumstances of a proposal and retains the flexibility to exercise its discretion and apply the Proxy Guidelines in the best interests of the Fund.

The Adviser has retained an independent third party (the “Service Firm”) to provide the Adviser with proxy analysis, vote execution, record keeping, and reporting services.

It is possible, but unlikely, that the Adviser may be subject to conflicts of interest in the voting of proxies due to business or personal relationships with persons having an interest in the outcome of certain votes. For example, the Adviser may provide investment management services to accounts owned or controlled by companies whose management is soliciting proxies, or the Adviser may have business or personal relationships with other proponents of proxy proposals, participants in proxy contests, corporate directors or candidates for directorships. The Proxy Committee shall take steps to ensure a decision to vote the proxy was based on the Fund’s best interest and was not the product of the material conflict. To resolve a material conflict of interest, the Proxy Committee may (but is not limited to) base its vote on pre-determined guidelines or polices which requires little discretion of Adviser’s personnel; disclose the conflict to the Fund’s board of directors and obtain their consent prior to voting; or base its vote on the analysis and recommendation of an independent third party.

 

DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

The Funds’ Boards of Directors has adopted procedures and policies regarding the disclosure of portfolio holdings in order to assist the Funds in preventing the misuse of material nonpublic information and to ensure that shareholders and other interested parties continue to receive portfolio information on a uniform basis. The Chief Compliance Officer oversees application of the policies and provides the Boards with periodic reports regarding the Funds’ compliance with the policies.

Complete portfolio holdings are included in the Funds’ annual and semi-annual reports. The annual and semi-annual reports are mailed to all shareholders, and are filed with the SEC. Copies of the Funds’ reports are available on the Funds’ website. The Funds file their complete portfolio holdings with the SEC within 60 days after the end of their first and third quarters on Form N-Q. Copies of the Funds’ reports and Forms N-Q are available free on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-202-942-8090. Copies are available for a fee from the SEC by calling the SEC at 1-202-942-8090, by making an e-mail request at publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, D.C. 20549-01102.

31


A complete portfolio holdings report as of the end of each calendar quarter is available to all shareholders, prospective shareholders, intermediaries that distribute the Funds’ shares, third-party service providers, rating and ranking organizations and affiliated persons of the Funds. A copy of the report may be obtained by contacting an Investor Service Representative.

The Funds’ Chairman and the Global Chief Investment Officer of Sit Investment Associates, Inc. (“SIA”) (the Funds’ investment adviser) may authorize disclosure of portfolio holdings at a time or times other than the calendar quarter end provided that a.) the chief investment officer determines that the disclosure of the portfolio information is for a legitimate business reason and in the best interest of the Funds; b.) the recipients are subject to a duty of confidentiality (and non-use) if appropriate; and c.) the Funds provide a report of the disclosure to the Boards of Directors at the Boards’ next regularly scheduled meetings. The prohibition against the disclosure of non-public portfolio holdings information to an unaffiliated third party does not apply to information sharing with the Funds’ service providers, including the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, the Funds’ auditor, counsel, accountant, transfer agent, proxy voting service provider or custodian, who require access to such information in order to fulfill their contractual duties to the Funds.

Information regarding the Funds’ aggregate portfolio characteristics may be disclosed at any time. Disclosure of the ownership of a particular portfolio holding may be made at any time provided the security has been included in a Fund’s quarterly portfolio holdings report.

The Funds, SIA or any affiliate may not receive compensation or other consideration in connection with the disclosure of information about portfolio securities.

 

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

The following persons owned of record or beneficially 5% or more of the respective Fund’s outstanding shares as of July 8, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Person

 

 

Record
Only

 

Beneficially
Only

 

Of Record &
Beneficially

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charles Schwab & Company, Inc., Special Custody Account for Benefit Cust, 101 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA

 

51%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Financial Services Corporation for Benefit Cust, P.O. Box 3908, New York, NY

 

18%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TAX-FREE INCOME FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charles Schwab & Company, Inc., Special Custody Account for Benefit Cust, 101 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA

 

11%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Financial Services Corporation for benefit of cust., P.O. Box 3908, New York, NY

 

37%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prudential Investment Mgmt Services for benefit of Mutual Fund Clients, 100 Mulberry Street, Newark, NJ 07102

 

9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MINNESOTA TAX-FREE INCOME FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charles Schwab & Company, Inc., Special Custody Account for Benefit Cust, 101 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA

 

21%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Financial Services Corporation for Benefit Cust, P.O. Box 3908, New York, NY

 

7%

 

 

 

 

32


As of July 8, 2008, the officers and directors of the Funds, as a group, owned less than 1% of the U.S. Government Securities Fund, Tax-Free Income Fund, and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund.

 

TAXES

Each Fund intends to fulfill the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as a regulated investment company. If so qualified, each Fund will not be liable for federal income taxes to the extent it distributes its taxable income to its shareholders.

To qualify under Subchapter M for tax treatment as a regulated investment company, each Fund must, among other things: (1) distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (as that term is defined in the Code; determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid) and 90% of its net tax-exempt income; (2) derive at least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities, or other income derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities, or currency, and (3) diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each fiscal quarter of the Fund, (a) at least 50% of the market value of the Fund’s assets is represented by cash, cash items, United States Government securities and securities of other regulated investment companies, and other securities, with these other securities limited, with respect to any one issuer, to an amount no greater than 5% of the Fund’s total assets and no greater than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (b) not more than 25% of the market value of the Fund’s total assets is invested in the securities of any one issuer (other than United States Government securities or securities of other regulated investment companies).

Each Fund is subject to a non-deductible excise tax equal to 4% of the excess, if any, of the amount required to be distributed for each calendar year over the amount actually distributed. In order to avoid the imposition of this excise tax, each Fund must declare and pay dividends representing 98% of its net investment income for that calendar year and 98% of its capital gains (both long-term and short-term) for the twelve-month period ending October 31 of the calendar year.

Each Fund intends to distribute to shareholders any excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss (“net capital gain”) for each taxable year. Such gain is distributed as a capital gain dividend and is taxable to shareholders as long-term capital gain, regardless of the length of time the shareholder has held the shares, whether such gain was recognized by the Fund prior to the date on which a shareholder acquired shares of the Fund and whether the distribution was paid in cash or reinvested in shares.

When shares of a Fund are sold or otherwise disposed of, the Fund shareholder will realize a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the purchase price and the sale price of the shares disposed of, if, as is usually the case, the Fund shares are a capital asset in the hands of the Fund shareholder. In addition, pursuant to a special provision in the Code, if Fund shares with respect to which a long-term capital gain distribution has been made are held for six months or less, any loss on the sale or other disposition of such shares will be a long-term capital loss to the extent of such long-term capital gain distribution. Any loss on the sale or exchange of shares of the Tax-Free Income Fund or the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund held for six months or less (although regulations may reduce this time period to 31 days) will be disallowed for federal income tax purposes to the extent of the amount of any exempt-interest dividend received with respect to such shares. Certain deductions otherwise allowable to financial institutions and property and casualty insurance companies will be eliminated or reduced by reason of the receipt of certain exempt-interest dividends.

Any loss on the sale or exchange of shares of a Fund generally will be disallowed to the extent that a shareholder acquires or contracts to acquire shares of the same Fund within 30 days before or after such sale or exchange.

Under the Code, interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry shares of an investment company paying exempt-interest dividends, such as the Tax-Free Income Fund, or the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund, will not be deductible by a shareholder in proportion to the ratio of exempt-interest dividends to all dividends other than those treated as long-term capital gains. Indebtedness may be allocated to shares of the Tax-Free Income Fund or the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund, even though not directly traceable to the purchase of such shares. Federal law also restricts the deductibility of other expenses allocable to shares of such Fund.

33


The Tax-Free Income Fund and the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund intend to take all actions required under the Code to ensure that each Fund may pay “exempt-interest dividends.” Distributions of net interest income from tax-exempt obligations that are designated by the Funds as exempt-interest dividends are excludable from the gross income of the Funds’ shareholders. The Funds’ present policy is to designate exempt-interest dividends annually. The Funds will calculate exempt-interest dividends based on the average annual method and the percentage of income designated as tax-exempt for any particular distribution may be substantially different from the percentage of income that was tax-exempt during the period covered by the distribution. Shareholders are required for information purposes to report exempt-interest dividends and other tax-exempt interest on their tax return. Distributions paid from other taxable interest income and from any net realized short-term capital gains will be taxable to shareholders as ordinary income, whether received in cash or in additional shares.

For federal income tax purposes, an alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) is imposed on taxpayers to the extent that such tax exceeds a taxpayer’s regular income tax liability (with certain adjustments). Exempt-interest dividends attributable to interest income on certain tax-exempt obligations issued after August 7, 1986 to finance certain private activities are treated as an item of tax preference that is included in alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of computing the federal AMT for all taxpayers. The Tax-Free Income Fund and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund may each invest up to 20% of its net assets in securities that generate interest that is treated as an item of tax preference. In addition, a portion of all other tax-exempt interest received by a corporation, including exempt-interest dividends, will be included in adjusted current earnings and in earnings and profits for purposes of determining the federal corporate AMT and the branch profits tax imposed on foreign corporations under Section 884 of the Code.

Because liability for the AMT depends upon the regular tax liability and tax preference items of a specific taxpayer, the extent, if any, to which any tax preference items resulting from investment in the Tax-Free Income Fund or the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund will be subject to the tax will depend upon each shareholder’s individual situation. For shareholders with substantial tax preferences, the AMT could reduce the after-tax economic benefits of an investment in the Tax-Free Income Fund or the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund. Each shareholder is advised to consult his or her tax adviser with respect to the possible effects of such tax preference items.

In addition, shareholders who are or may become recipients of Social Security benefits should be aware that exempt-interest dividends are includable in computing “modified adjusted gross income” for purposes of determining the amount of Social Security benefits, if any, that is required to be included in gross income. The maximum amount of Social Security benefits includable in gross income is 85%.

The Code imposes requirements on certain tax-exempt bonds which, if not satisfied, could result in loss of tax exemption for interest on such bonds, even retroactively to the date of issuance of the bonds. Proposals may be introduced before Congress in the future, the purpose of which will be to further restrict or eliminate the federal income tax exemption for tax-exempt securities. The Tax-Free Income Fund and the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund cannot predict what additional legislation may be enacted that may affect shareholders. The Funds will avoid investment in tax-exempt securities which, in the opinion of the investment adviser, pose a material risk of the loss of tax exemption. Further, if a tax-exempt security in a Fund’s portfolio loses its exempt status, the Fund will make every effort to dispose of such investment on terms that are not detrimental to the Fund.

If the Funds invest in zero coupon obligations upon their issuance, such obligations will have original issue discount in the hands of the Fund. Generally, the original issue discount equals the difference between the “stated redemption price at maturity” of the obligation and its “issue price” as those terms are defined in the Code. If a Fund acquires an already issued zero coupon bond from another holder, the bond will have original issue discount in the Fund’s hands, equal to the difference between the “adjusted issue price” of the bond at the time a Fund acquires it (that is, the original issue price of the bond plus the amount of original issue discount accrued to date) and its stated redemption price at maturity. In each case, except with respect to tax-exempt securities, a Fund is required to accrue as ordinary interest income a portion of such original issue discount even though it receives no cash currently as interest payment on the obligation. Furthermore, if a Fund invests in U.S. Treasury inflation-protection securities, it will be required to treat as original issue discount any increase in the principal amount of the securities that occurs during the course of its taxable year. If a Fund purchases such inflation-protection securities that are issued in stripped form either as stripped bonds or coupons, it will be treated as if it had purchased a newly issued debt instrument having original issue discount.

34


Because each Fund is required to distribute substantially all of its net investment income (including accrued original issue discount), a Fund investing in either zero coupon bonds or U.S. Treasury inflation protection securities may be required to distribute to shareholders an amount greater than the total cash income it actually receives. Accordingly, in order to make the required distributions, the Fund may be required to borrow or to liquidate securities.

The foregoing relates only to federal income taxation and is a general summary of the federal tax law in effect as of the date of this Statement of Additional Information. Shareholders should consult their own tax advisers regarding their particular tax circumstance.

 

Minnesota Income Taxation - Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund

Minnesota taxable net income is based generally on federal taxable income. The portion of exempt-interest dividends paid by the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund that is derived from interest on Minnesota tax exempt obligations is excluded from the Minnesota taxable net income of individuals, estates and trusts, provided that the portion of the exempt-interest dividends from such Minnesota sources paid to all shareholders represents 95% or more of the exempt-interest dividends paid by the Fund. The remaining portion of such dividends, and dividends that are not exempt-interest dividends or capital gain dividends, are included in the Minnesota taxable net income of individuals, estates and trusts, except for dividends directly attributable to interest on obligations of the U.S. government, its territories and possessions. Exempt-interest dividends are not excluded from the Minnesota taxable income of corporations and financial institutions. Dividends qualifying for federal income tax purposes as capital gain dividends are to be treated by shareholders as long-term capital gains. Minnesota has repealed the favorable treatment of long-term capital gains, while retaining restrictions on the deductibility of capital losses. Exempt-interest dividends attributable to interest on certain private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986 will be included in Minnesota alternative minimum taxable income of individuals, estates and trusts for purposes of computing Minnesota’s alternative minimum tax. Dividends generally will not qualify for the dividends-received deduction for corporations and financial institutions.

In 1995, the Minnesota legislature enacted a statement of intent that interest on obligations of Minnesota and its political subdivisions and Indian tribes be included in the net income of individuals, estates and trusts for Minnesota income tax purposes if a court determines that Minnesota’s exemption of such interest unlawfully discriminates against interstate commerce. This provision applies to taxable years that begin during or after the calendar year in which the court’s decision becomes final.

On May 19, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case of Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, in which a taxpayer had challenged Kentucky’s scheme of taxation under which it exempted from taxation interest on the bonds of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and its political subdivisions while subjecting to tax interest on the bonds of other states and their political subdivisions. The Supreme Court held that Kentucky’s taxing scheme did not violate the Commerce Clause. The Court, however, dealt with bonds of the state and its political subdivisions that financed governmental projects, and noted that the case did not present the question of the treatment of private activity bonds that are used to finance projects for private entities. (The Court’s opinion also did not address the issue of discriminatory treatment of Indian tribal bonds.) The Court’s opinion left open the possibility that another party could challenge a state’s discriminatory treatment of the interest on private activity bonds as violating the Commerce Clause. The management of the Funds is not aware that any such case has been brought. Nevertheless, a court in the future could hold that a state’s discriminatory treatment of private activity bonds of issuers located within or outside the state violates the Commerce Clause, and in that case the 1995 Minnesota legislative provision could take effect and interest on certain Minnesota obligations held by the Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund would become taxable in Minnesota.

 

CAPITALIZATION AND VOTING RIGHTS

 

Each of the Funds or the corporate issuer of their shares is organized as a Minnesota corporation. Each of the Funds (or its corporate issuer) has only one class of shares — common shares. The U.S. Government Securities Fund has one series of common shares consisting of ten billion shares with a par value of one-tenth of one cent per share. The corporate issuer of Tax-Free Income Fund, and Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund (Sit Mutual Funds II, Inc.) is organized as a series fund with one trillion shares of common stock authorized and a par value of one tenth of one cent per share. Ten billion of these shares have been designated by the Board of Directors for each series: Series A Common Shares, which represent shares of Tax-Free Income Fund; Series B Common Shares,

35


 

which represent shares of Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund. The Board of Directors of Sit Mutual Funds II, Inc. is empowered to issue other series of common stock without shareholder approval.

The shares of each Fund are nonassessable, can be redeemed or transferred and have no preemptive or conversion rights. All shares have equal, noncumulative voting rights which means that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of Directors can elect all of the Directors if they choose to do so. A shareholder is entitled to one vote for each full share (and a fractional vote for each fractional share) then registered in his/her name on the books of each Fund. The shares of each Fund are of equal value and each share is entitled to a pro rata portion of the income dividends and any capital gain distributions.

The Funds are not required under Minnesota law to hold annual or periodically scheduled meetings of shareholders. Minnesota corporation law provides for the Board of Directors to convene shareholder meetings when it deems appropriate. In addition, if a regular meeting of shareholders has not been held during the immediately preceding fifteen months, Minnesota law allows a shareholder or shareholders holding three percent or more of the voting shares of the Funds to demand a regular meeting of shareholders by written notice of demand given to the chief executive officer or the chief financial officer of the Funds. Ninety days after receipt of the demand, a regular meeting of shareholders must be held at the expense of the Funds. Additionally, the Investment Company Act of 1940 requires shareholder votes for all amendments to fundamental investment policies and restrictions and for all amendments to investment advisory contracts.

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The financial statements included in the Funds’ annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 are incorporated by reference in this Statement of Additional Information.

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

Custodian; Counsel; Accountants

PFPC Trust Company, 8800 Tinicum Boulevard, Third Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19153, acts as custodian of the Funds’ assets and portfolio securities; Dorsey & Whitney LLP, 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, is the independent General Counsel for the Funds; and KPMG LLP, 4200 Wells Fargo Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, acts as the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm.

 

LIMITATION OF DIRECTOR LIABILITY

 

The Directors of the Funds are governed by Minnesota law. Under Minnesota law, each director of the Funds owes certain fiduciary duties to the Funds and to their shareholders. Minnesota law provides that a director “shall discharge the duties of the position of director in good faith, in a manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interest of the corporation, and with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances.” Fiduciary duties of a director of a Minnesota corporation include, therefore, both a duty of “loyalty” (to act in good faith and act in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation) and a duty of “care” (to act with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances). Minnesota law authorizes corporations to eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of the fiduciary duty of “care”. Minnesota law does not, however, permit a corporation to eliminate or limit the liability of a director (i) for any breach of the directors’ duty of “loyalty” to the corporation or its shareholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) for authorizing a dividend, stock repurchase or redemption or other distribution in violation of Minnesota law or for violation of certain provisions of Minnesota securities laws or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. The Articles of Incorporation of the Company limit the liability of directors to the fullest extent permitted by Minnesota statutes, except to the extent that such liability cannot be limited as provided in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (which Act prohibits any provisions which purport to limit the liability of directors arising from such directors’ willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of their role as directors).

36


Minnesota law does not eliminate the duty of “care” imposed upon a director. It only authorizes a corporation to eliminate monetary liability for violations of that duty. Minnesota law, further, does not permit elimination or limitation of liability of “officers” to the corporation for breach of their duties as officers (including the liability of directors who serve as officers for breach of their duties as officers). Minnesota law does not permit elimination or limitation of the availability of equitable relief, such as injunctive or rescissionary relief. Further, Minnesota law does not permit elimination or limitation of a director’s liability under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and it is uncertain whether and to what extent the elimination of monetary liability would extend to violations of duties imposed on directors by the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules and regulations adopted under such Act.







37


APPENDIX A
BOND AND COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS

 

 

 

 

 

 

BOND RATINGS

 

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

Aaa

 

Judged to be the best quality, carry the smallest degree of investment risk.

 

 

Aa

 

Judged to be of high quality by all standards.

 

 

A

 

Possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as higher medium grade obligations

 

 

Baa

 

Medium grade obligations. Lack outstanding investment characteristics.

 

 

Ba

 

Judged to have speculative elements. Protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate.

 

 

B

 

Generally lack characteristics of a desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal payments over any long period of time may be small.

 

 

Moody’s also applies numerical indicators, 1, 2, and 3, to rating categories Aa through Ba. The modifier 1 indicates that the security is in the higher end of the rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and 3 indicates a ranking toward the lower end of the category.

 

Standard & Poor’s

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

AAA

 

Highest grade obligations and possess the ultimate degree of protection as to principal and interest.

 

 

AA

 

Also qualify as high grade obligations, and in the majority of instances differ from AAA issues only in small degree.

 

 

A

 

Regarded as upper medium grade, have considerable investment strength but are not entirely free from adverse effects of changes in economic and trade conditions, interest and principal are regarded as safe.

 

 

BBB

 

Considered investment grade with adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal.

 

 

BB

 

Judged to be speculative with some inadequacy to meet timely interest and principal payments.

 

 

B

 

Has greater vulnerability to default than other speculative grade securities. Adverse economic conditions will likely impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and principal.

 

 

Standard & Poor’s applies indicators “+”, no character, and “-” to the above rating categories AA through B. The indicators show relative standing within the major rating categories.

 

Fitch Ratings

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

AAA

 

Highest credit quality with exceptional ability to pay interest and repay principal.

 

 

AA

 

Investment grade and very high credit quality ability to pay interest and repay principal is very strong, although not quite as strong as AAA.

 

 

A

 

Investment grade with high credit quality. Ability to pay interest and repay principal is strong.

 

 

BBB

 

Investment grade and has satisfactory credit quality. Adequate ability to pay interest and repay principal.

 

 

BB

 

Considered speculative. Ability to pay interest and repay principal may be affected over time by adverse economic changes.

 

 

B

 

Considered highly speculative. Currently meeting interest and principal obligations, but probability of continued payment reflects limited margin of safety.

 

 

+ and - indicators indicate the relative position within the rating category, but are not used in AAA category.

38


 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS

Moody’s

 

Commercial paper rated “Prime” carries the smallest degree of investment risk. The modifiers 1, 2, and 3 are used to denote relative strength within this highest classification.

Standard & Poor’s

 

The rating A-1 is the highest commercial paper rating assigned by Standard & Poor’s Corporation. The modifier “+” indicates that the security is in the higher end of this rating category.

Fitch Ratings

 

 

F-1+

 

Exceptionally strong credit quality.

 

F-1

 

Strong credit quality.







39


APPENDIX B
MUNICIPAL BOND, MUNICIPAL NOTE AND TAX-EXEMPT COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal Bond Ratings

 

Standard & Poor’s:

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

AAA

 

Highest rating; extremely strong security.

 

 

AA

 

Very strong security; differs from AAA in only a small degree.

 

 

A

 

Strong capacity but more susceptible to adverse economic effects than two above categories.

 

 

BBB

 

Adequate capacity but adverse economic conditions more likely to weaken capacity.

 

 

BB

 

Judged to be speculative with some inadequacy to meet timely interest and principal payments.

 

 

B

 

Has greater vulnerability to default than other speculative grade securities. Adverse economic conditions will likely impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and principal.

 

 

Standard & Poor’s applies indicators “+”, no character, and “-” to the above rating categories AA through B. The indicators show relative standing within the major rating categories.

 

Moody’s Investors Services, Inc.:

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

Aaa

 

Best quality; carry the smallest degree of investment risk.

 

 

Aa

 

High quality; margins of protection not quite as large as the Aaa bonds.

 

 

A

 

Upper medium grade; security adequate but could be susceptible to impairment.

 

 

Baa

 

Medium grade; neither highly protected nor poorly secured--lack outstanding investment characteristics and sensitive to changes in economic circumstances.

 

 

Ba

 

Judged to have speculative elements. Protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate.

 

 

B

 

Generally lack characteristics of a desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal payments over any long period of time may be small.

 

 

Moody’s also applies numerical indicators, 1, 2, and 3, to rating categories Aa through Ba. The modifier 1 indicates that the security is in the higher end of the rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and 3 indicates a ranking toward the lower end of the category.

 

Fitch Ratings:

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

AAA

 

Highest credit quality with exceptional ability to pay interest and repay principal.

 

 

AA

 

Investment grade and very high credit quality ability to pay interest and repay principal is very strong, although not quite as strong as AAA.

 

 

A

 

Investment grade with high credit quality. Ability to pay interest and repay principal is strong.

 

 

BBB

 

Investment grade and has satisfactory credit quality. Adequate ability to pay interest and repay principal.

 

 

BB

 

Considered speculative. Ability to pay interest and repay principal may be affected over time by adverse economic changes.

 

 

B

 

Considered highly speculative. Currently meeting interest and principal obligations, but probability of continued payment reflects limited margin of safety.

 

 

+ and - indicators indicate the relative position within the rating category, but are not used in AAA category.

Municipal Note Ratings

 

 

Standard & Poor’s:

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

SP-1

 

Very strong or strong capacity to pay principal and interest. Those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics will be given a plus (+) designation.

 

 

SP-2

 

Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest.

 

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.:

 

 

Rating*

 

Definition

 

 

 

MIG 1

 

Best quality.

 

 

MIG 2

 

High quality.

 

 

MIG 3

 

Favorable quality.

 

 

MIG 4

 

Adequate quality.

40


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  

A short-term issue having a demand feature, i.e., payment relying on external liquidity and usually payable upon demand rather than fixed maturity dates, is differentiated by Moody’s with the use of the symbols VMIG1 through VMIG4.

 

Tax-Exempt Commercial Paper Ratings

 

Standard & Poor’s:

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

A-1+

 

Highest degree of safety.

 

 

A-1

 

Very strong degree of safety.

 

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.:

 

 

Rating

 

Definition

 

 

 

Prime 1(P-1)

 

Superior capacity for repayment.







41